arXiv:cond-mat/0106646 29 Jun 2001 t T i s m t ca bo n I ‘ W e ce r m t e G ca

q t e p m e F s m t w l L m f c l bo t **

ndu h h h e a h s e o h n o i p x n v n l o u r a a h g h i k d a ti a a a ec e e e r e e d l o F er l l ll ec h ac c e e † n a D T bb r un un n e e n c e ss e gn gn gn e t i r r a o o a t S l n r ay n a e e h pp d e n m ; t hu u b o n r h o i r i g n r m d i n tl t i q t d ce p i i a i e d d f s b . a t f l ea r t a u s c e e e y n ca s a i od , i N u a y i i . m y s a u r a i a y o u o n s n m c ti ti ti m h L a a ca y ng po d t i p t t o o r rr r l T ’ d c s r a i d n e n l g o li e ca a e s c c h . – a e c y y s y o c e e f a b o e e it d ll n m gn h y d n v o b r L d s n B n s , ‘ r ca s r mm l f ea h n b o a ce y n p d e e e ugh r e s e p a s t e . ec i t ca B a f t t t o ce i o n o u u o a e n f w , l s d e h a a e m m n h o b s h u ec t s s ti nd e w ti ti d l s r l a o u g e o e s m o e z a c I e a e m k l r d l b ce un ng i t a h o o s s n e c . c h e l a ’ s h e n e h s c i e o u g it ec oppo i ti m n s ss

f b u f d er n s r l m v ce a t o e ze c ca ere r f s c p t T e s Su i o – d w N s h c ca l u ee n a h e a t m a ca l u o o a u t ti t a p ’ e a d p n a V m o h w a r l l i i r r e c u n o t . rr n n ti a r k r c e s t b ti l e t w o i m d i w r h n ti ‡ g s ( a k a a op a h s a s t o s s o ti n ilit o e e o n s s , e c r o m e I r w i a n r n . ce , e a o a i e h u m - t i d o o n ti it n o e i n r n p s n ea s re f on m e c n b y n d f b n e lti T b a ec n y m ) a t n ca m e d e L a er r s h y . ag s l d s r ’ o a , u y c it w t n m t hu e r l s n i e 2 ti tit i e u , i ee t p r a a i h n ti a a t i y a T a , l: n . w l a c t o a t n i n m t h n r it r e l n l t s o t i a s m c t b y o h l t l i f n t s y m s k h i m e t s s u o r a s e u e L e e n h i n h e l ace g b o d u a e o d , n s i m o s r a , C o a e w 1930 s r q a i ill t u t i t ec e i g m n i l i i r ti w t b w r n n e D gn h c s i f t e gn e a c ti # u s e up a m o e m s r e o a o t L l a s a e R u a u l –bo t i f e h gn i s a o ng o n m e h a . n f h r t t l o n s li l p o e ti t s i ugg r a i n , i a pp a n h p ’ ec a h a s h n a - a nh a f t T tt ti t nd h f ll m f , s c t n bo nd @ e a e re y ll a r r l ace c t m r i c t e m ec s h a h op un t y s i ti m s n t d t li r s r t e ag P c m o ( ss i b c m h h e o ere o d i t e o e e i a t a i f t un d B e c h e a o m s e a s s e o d ss p h a t r s e l s s gn a f d f e g e c t h d s i r a u d v a m V , n t ti m t u a up h t o ng it r d o y r a o p n h r e d e u r s a t m h t e k n ss ca t lt o n a r e q o r a h i g e ) o s n ti n m l r s i a l o e y d b e a R a y . e t s n n t ec u e e n h ti e e nd e b e s i r s a i m u r w t t m u f n , i B t a bo t xh l o t c y c a v w o g e d p w r t h c e l qu a e e r h a f r lt gn d h t ac s o o n , f e e s o . f a . e i , c m a s a o y r h e † d i w t a b o ss un n t i f n , d m gn b o a r o . p a t i ea h , s i r g u b i a s i y r t e i D **, O d u r ec t s ag c a un i L c e r h b k n e m S n ss l e a i u e eac , o m it e n ti s tit ti e i d a a r s c h c e i o t ce ov n u s a c a , r e g . ac ti s k t c m a c h i y d a h l o ti n i li n o ce f c r ti m p u s nd u u n r ce o i h t gn o S c e s r a e tt n re e b r e f c h a k h 1 ) a A e h eac f t a s y m v l n a h n r t a un t . s p e t r e i c e e ca ti e e s a c l e e ac e q e ec e a i i c i gn i n s i p n a ti r o m s d i W I ng r s o ng ng n r a ti l i l u v w u m n e r e d n o m ti a ll m - un h d n b s a t n it t i e r n h o o a g s ca e ( , a e a e r n n t r f h h e ss o e . s , ilit , ss s a m m i t n l ti n a m i ti u l a r r t l c a d b n a tit e ce n r v e n d t i T s t p ll ti ce u a i c d c a s o t i t i o ag ze i u a l h e t v t t t i ca M i y i i m l ng n r y e e re h h h i v h h h t n o c o o r a n m l a e u e e i s f- l 3 y ov d d d y e e e a e e e e e I a s s s s s - f f f - t l t l l . . , , t nd , . Jaya i re qu e o nu B M w i n , f t d s i h l a e B e u a a o t t o o q l a r n ca

e o s a do f t ( a p li o w e t a t o b a do b P t ti d i n h s e

s h h y h u h h r a i t l u r s x pp pp r c e n r u cc a f u r r e m e b c a . a a t e s t e s e c e e m e e l t i a g e r h t ti t ti m t T W e a r e m i a y ilit t u k n i ti m t ng i m o h o e o e n e o it . nn d q u n w a s , n s r ea bo c p o . u c m n f o ea r o g o c r r r i r a d o . ti a e s r u a e d t un o J u v n e B o r e e e l r i p s t d h t n y i n u r I m s e a ac m w t r s s e o n h – i h N D e d un n ll o m o m ti s n nn r a e o w ava a i s m a ss d h t l hub s li i e n s ff c d e ca t ng o 6 o b l s m t i y p r ca h t r s o t a t h ng r ti o h . u . t e , qu e r l a i i h o y d h e m i t r e . l i w e i a t ec a a B a a d e r a p r m o r o n e ng n k r c T u r a S e l a o t T e e l t e c ss t rr y e a a f a o m n i e V t d r r r s li e e h T i a h r e t f s r s e w t ec a o a e n , hu t s ti s a y n d w ec , p i e o d s e ‡ J i ti d b e er e i o 560 m e n , h r t s f ng n R t ll c ( n d v o m a p h a s t c a w o r g m a i c ng t i i h t a t s h o w t u t e it e y ee t e y n r r y u n ece f i ea . s t a o i h t o e h a h , o e ze e o , k e o l a s nd f h

a lt , n s a s h u s s d w r i a r s l e a a e r . t o e rr s r s t n 6 y d f a d s r i ng nn r w e e c ilt y

a c w a B cr o s t h : c u o n t y s e ce e k r li 080, s s a i i i o h ss r L h , i t III d r e ca d s r a e n v lt s n r t a f e e s ( a r - i e f t e a e o e d it a e o e m 4 N o a m m o t i a n a i h s y s i i a t s d r a r r t d . r v d e g x ng l ss q m ss c n t i o l l ng u s w i ) un u r o e ca m i , a e g a n , h s e w e m a a n i , a m p ti u , il . r r t 751 lt f c a ss s n L s t i a ov t e n a d a S gn r a e t p p p e li i w o re o e p i s e F h y o u a , i o d m – a ti r pp I s i n ss i k a l d n o r r t i r a v i r c n t a p a r a f e a ss o a v i nd r p f h K o ca c i op t er n e e e e a

l f v t n m it ti i ea t o , lt n nd t s r h r s u u e – h il c o b o i ti b , n ti n r d , gn i e

i u e h e ti o r n d v e a r s r o u e l o

p e v e 005, r e n / w m a e c o m s s i d q r t m a e e t r ee L it c e F r o s ac l w m a t a e e m d e u r h , f w und e r g d i u i d a b do h e e it a cc o d t y i o ti y a m a f n o a ’ i e ca p ti w ti s e n ti y a i r m a e d x i e i nn a t s h q s ) ti m kk r ea t r t o u s ca s k n t . v i r c . a n m w ti a a n o h p i s a m e h u n a t c i o n t ss o K o c e l e li a t r s t B ng e c n s li s n e a s a p r a i u y m a e l tt e I o , n t k T o a r n i p gn c i e s a , m r n c h b l r n nd i i c a s r n s eca , ss o , u i o a e n - b c . h p s o t n hu er o a g – l t i a y a i n e it t r m K t e ze u , b r n it t y n w u t s v h a a u e a f d i m m o l P i q , s i e a r ng l y bo e n t e l i s g t ti i ss ti b ng m ag q t ti s o t i it u i e u x l r h a a d o o a i u e e s o d b ng av o o g t a r nd d u u a s o o t e m s ti t ili t l h a e i w u f i l n d o o r i h ea r un n m u , , . b e a k s n a it s a n p ng r k n e o e odd t f e a e t c e re s o n t m f w t b i ca 5 h e N a # e e t , o s k a n h h e n t - q l w y k ? d o t t r t e t ec n d o h r u d n t bo h f w d i a o u e i t d e u o a h w i i a n e i a i n ng a s h e c w T e e u c i gn e m i s n ss s m s it w e r s a c h s f L w o n t w e e l p q e m n u y b h u t u a 700 s e ca o h a w r r m e f a , i h a

o e e u t t e e t h m s v h e t i lt: s va a p e m t i u h n h w x n i r s p n e u r t r a u ti x h n d a it e i o e l ti ss b n s ea e a i e e er e t o r v d c ti e t t od r t e t i it a i n c c n i , h f h n r a o ac s n w t r ss p e o u n m s i q e e u s p o

s i a y i ac u d e t i t e i n ce e t t i 098, ng a t r n d l n t ss s o , s u m ss u t h p r y a n e z ) a i k h lt w t i a h i e –d h u op t e p n m r a a r e s s o b n w r -f s l t ti i l e q n e e b e p u a e ea n a . s e s n e e n e , n m , a ss e n , a n u n o o ce g e h a t e r e i l t d d a s s t ti a d e t v m t j B ss B , t t op ti o i a n a t u r t n u e t a n i t w l u t r h h e o o ng . e h c h ce s o a p u g n t i n i u a i t m e a i a V V t- s i n o d o a o o n n n h n n y e e e e e c s - - - - - f - - : t t l t l the subtle role of boundary electrons, a key point, as Another significant point concerning eq. (1), which mentioned before, in the whole business of orbital mag- provided one of the motivations for us to write this note, netism; (b) the effect of dissipation on Landau diamagne- is the explicit presence of the friction coefficient r in an tism, an equilibrium property; (c) quantum–classical equilibrium function M. Recall that r had its origin in the crossover as the system transits from the Landau to the coupling constant, characterizing the interaction between Bohr–Van Leeuwen regimes as a function of damping; the gas of electrons and the bath. Normally, such a con- and (d) the combined effect of dissipation and confine- stant disappears from equilibrium answers, which are ment on extracted from irreversible statistical mechanical methods, Landau diamagnetism, the latter arising from coherent wherein the system–bath interaction is treated as a ‘weak cyclotron motion of the electrons. The item (d) is par- coupling’. What is crucial for dissipative diamagnetism ticularly relevant in the context of intrinsic decoherence in is that the system–bath interaction has to be treated mesoscopic structures in view of heat bath-induced influ- exactly – there is no clear-cut separation between what is ence7. Further, items (b)–(d), put together, had prompted a system and what is a bath – both are inexorably linked us to ask question on not whether the BV theorem sur- into one many-body system! vives dissipation, but whether the Landau diamagnetism A related point is that the same coefficient r determines itself survives dissipation? what is however a transport property, viz. the Drude re- The central result for the diamagnetic moment M per sistivity: particle of a non-degenerate gas of free electrons, in con- mr tact with an Ohmic bath, derived in Dattagupta and Singh6 v = , (5) 2 can be written as ρe ρ being the change carrier number density. Eliminating r 2KT ∞ 1 M = − ω 2 ∑ , (1) in favour or v and introducing the ‘Hall resistivity’ R as c 2 2 B n=1 (ν + r) + ω B n c R = , (6) ρec where eq. (1) can be suggestively rewritten as 2π ν = ∞ n KTn, (2) mc 1 1 ! − M = ∑ , (7) ! ν + µ + 2 e n=11 ( n v) and where ω = eB c , (3) !ω mc ν = c , (8) 2KT B being the magnetic field. We would like to remind the v reader, in the context of the point (a) in the paragraph v = , R above, that the result, eq. (1), was extracted from the so- lution of the appropriate quantum Langevin equations, by and taking the t → ∞ limit first and then letting the boundary πn of the system go to infinity. The complete expressions, µ = . (9) n ν including the time-dependence and the dependence on the parameters of the confining boundary, from which eq. (1) Equation (7) is a novel result: transport characterized has been deduced, are available in the literature6. It is also by the resistivity v determining an equilibrium property evident that in the limit of zero damping (r = 0), eq. (1) of orbital moment M in an efficient manner, because re- reduces to the Landau answer: sistance, in some sense, incorporates all relevant material properties. From another point of view, and especially in e! 2KT  !ω  Mo =  − coth  c  . (4) the context of contemporary relevant mesoscopic struc- !ω 2mc  c  2KT  tures, larger the resistance, higher is the level of incohe- rence. Thus, while Landau diamagnetism in eq. (4) is a It may be recalled that eq. (4) is usually derived from result of coherent property of a quantum system, dissipa- the partition function of a gas of free electrons in the tive diamagnetism, captured by eq. (7), is an expression of presence of a magnetic field2, whereas eq. (1) is extracted 6 intrinsic incoherence in a macroscopic quantum system. from a non-equilibrium method . The calculation itself To illustrate this point, we plot in Figure 1, the magnetic demonstrates inter alia that the path to equilibrium from a moment versus the resistivity: the increase in resistivity non-equilibrium state is not unique – it is important as to with the concomitant enhancement of incoherence leads to whether the system is ‘allowed to equilibrate’ in the pres- a vanishing magnitude of the orbital moment, as though ence of a boundary or in free space! Bohr and Van Leeuwen are resurrected! We may remark in passing that the Drude formula for gas. Now, in examining the issue of quantum–classical resistivity, eq. (5), is robust, almost oblivious to whether r crossover, it is interesting to introspect on what gets originates from scattering with phonons or defects or classicalized by environment-induced decoherence first: other electrons8. Thus eq. (5) remains valid in general, the phase space factor or the quantum statistics? Inasmuch except that the interpretation and calculation of r become as, in the calculation enumerated above, the electron gas an increasingly complex task, when the effects of disorder was treated as non-degenerate, i.e. the thermal de Broglie and electron correlations are to be considered. Therefore, wavelength of the electron was taken to be much less than our relation between a thermal equilibrium property, viz. the mean electron–electron spacing, the quantum statistics M and a transport property, viz. v, though appears facile, was already rendered ineffective (or classical). It was, as it is based on perhaps the simplest of models, subsumes therefore, only the phase space factor that got obfuscated a deep connection between orbital magnetism and dissi- by the increasing decoherence effects. On the other hand, pation – it transcends detailed issues of disorder and con- it would be extremely interesting to look for another

Figure 1. Scaled diamagnetic moment Y = − ( mc / e ! )M plotted against scaled resistivity X = v , for different values of the scaled cyclotron frequency v. comitant localization effects, as well as strong Coulomb quantum phenomenon, which is intrinsically due to correlations between electrons. statistics, such as the Bose–Einstein condensation, to Our final remark is in the context of quantum–classical enquire what dissipation does to it! It may well be that it crossover due to environment-induced decoherence, is the phase-breaking length rather than the de Broglie epitomized by the expression given in eq. (7). Remember length that must exceed the inter-particle spacing as a pre- that there are two distinct quantum effects which, in the condition for the quantum statistics to be effective. model of an electron gas, can be described thus: (1) one is Summarizing, diamagnetism seems to be a unique due to the fact that the position and momentum of an material property which does not exist in classical electron cannot be determined simultaneously, which is mechanics, but lives only in the quantum domain. Since why a continuum of states splits into discrete Landau quantum mechanics has to do with the phase of the wave- levels; we call this the phase space factor, and (2) the function, diamagnetism can be viewed to arise from other is due to the quantum statistics of indistinguishable quantum coherence. On the other hand, all materials are particles, in this case the Fermi–Dirac one. As long as the inherently dissipative due to scattering of electrons off de Broglie wavelength is smaller than the average inter- phonons, impurities, other electrons, etc. Because dissi- electron distance, the effect of statistics or the Pauli pation leads to incoherence, making a quantal system look exclusion principle can be neglected, which is indeed seemingly classical, it is interesting to study the influence what was done in deriving eq. (4) for a non-degenerate of dissipation on diamagnetism. Such an analysis, summa- rized in this article, elucidates many subtle issues of con- temporary condensed matter physics.

1. Bohr, N., Dissertation, Copenhagen, 1911; Van Leeuwen, J. H., J. Phys. (Paris), 1921, 2, 361. 2. Van Vleck, J. H., The Theory of Electrical and Magnetic Suscepti- bilities, Oxford University Press, London, 1932. 3. Landau, L., Z. Phys., 1930, 64, 629. 4. Peierls, R., Surprises in Theoretical Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1979. 5. Jayannavar, A. and Kumar, N., J. Phys. A., 1981, 14, 1399. 6. Dattagupta, S. and Singh, J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, 79, 961. 7. Mohanty, P., Jariwala, E. M. Q. and Webb, R. A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, 78, 3366. 8. Ashcroft, N. and Mermin, D., Solid State Physics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. We thank Kamal Saha for help in genera- ting Figure 1.