DOCSLIB.ORG

California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation California High-Speed Rail Authority California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation German Peer Review Report Phase I submitted by DE-Consult Deutsche Eisenbahn-Consulting GmbH Frankfurt am Main, Germany December 2000 C010333 German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor EvaluationJ Table of Contents Chapter No. Chapter Title Pa.qe 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Objective 1-1 1.2 Reports and Data Used for the Review 1-1 1.3 Structure of the Peer Review Process 1-1 1.4 Structure of the Report 1-3 1.5 Comments Received from Parsons Brinckerhoff 1-3 2. ALIGNMENT AND PERMANENT WAY DESIGN CRITERIA 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Alignment Design Parameters 2-1 2.2.1 Design Speed 2-1 2.2.2 Horizontal Alignment 2-2 2.2.3 Vertical Alignment 2-4 2.2.4 Summary of Alignment Design Parameters 2-5 2.3 Gauges and Clearances 2-7 2.3.1 Kinematic Envelope 2-7 2.3.2 Structure Clearances 2-7 2.3.3 Overhead Catenary System 2-7 2.3.4 Track Centerline Spacing 2-7 2.3.5 Cross Sections 2-8 2.3.6 Permanent Way 2-9 2.3.7 Ballast versus Slab Track 2-9 2.4 Summary 2-10 3. ROLLING STOCK ISSUES 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Current ICE Train Types in Operation 3-1 3.2.1 ICE 1 3-1 3.2.2 ICE 2 3-1 3.2.3 ICE 3 3-3 Phase 1 Report C010334Page German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation J 3.2.4 ICE-T 3-5 3.3 Future ICE Developments 3-5 3.3.1 Future Maximum Speeds in Germany 3-5 3.3.2 ICE 4 3-6 3.3.3 HTE 3-6 3.3.4 DPT 400 3-6 3.4 Comparison of CPT-type ICE 2 with DPT-type ICE 3 3-7 3.4.1 Technical Comparison 3-7 3.4.2 Life Cycle Cost Comparison 3-9 3.4.3 Summary of Relevant Technical Characteristics of ICE Trainsets 3-9 3.5 Acceleration Rates 3-10 3.6 High-Speed Freight Rolling Stock 3-10 3.6.1 Locomotives 3-10 3.6.2 Wagons 3-11 3.7 Summary 3-11 4. OPERATIONS ISSUES 4-1 4.1 General 4-1 4.2 Track Layout 4-2 4.3 Train Running Times 4-3 4.4 Operations Aspects 4-6 4.4.1 Timetable 4-6 4.4.2 Rolling Stock Requirements 4-7 4.4.3 Comparison with German High Speed Operations 4-8 4.5 Commuter Traffic 4-10 4.6 Freight Services 4-10 4.6.1 Freight Services in Europe 4-10 4.6.2 Freight Services on the California HSR System 4-11 4.6.3 Freight Compatibility Issues 4-12 4.7 O & M Cost Estimates 4-13 4.7.1 Energy Costs 4-13 4.7.2 Other O & M Costs 4-14 4.8 Summary 4-15 [ Phase 1 Report C010335Page ii German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation J 5. CONSTRUCTION UNIT COSTS AND SCHEDULES 5-1 5.1 Unit Costs 5-1 5,1.1 Track and Guideway Items 5-1 5,1.2 Earthwork and Related Items 5-2 5.1.3 Structures, Tunnels and Walls 5-3 5,1.4 Grade Separations 5-4 5.1.5 Building Items 5-5 5.1.6 Rail and Utility Relocation 5-6 5,1.7 Right-of-Way 5-7 5.1,8 Environmental Impact Mitigation 5-7 5.1.9 Signaling and Communications 5-8 5.1.10 Electrification 5-8 5.2 Completeness of Cost Items 5-8 5,3 Comparison of Percentage Breakdown of Costs 5-10 5.4 Comparison of Typical Cross-Sections 5-10 5,5 Schedules 5-11 5,6 Summary 5-13 6. CONCLUSIONS 6-1 Phase 1 Report C010336Page iii } German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor EvaluationJ List of Tables Table No. Table Title Pa.qe 1-1 List of Basic Questions to be Answered by the Peer Review 1-4 2-1 Summary of Alignment Design Parameters 2-6 3-1 Summary of Technical Performance Characteristics of ICE Trainsets 3-10 3-2 Acceleration Rates of High-Speed Trainsets 3-10 4-1 Comparison of Running Times Los Angeles - Bakersfield, Option A 4-6 4-2 Train Numbers by Type of Train on the German High Speed Line Hanover - WQrzburg 1996 / 1997 4-9 4-3 Approximate Running Time of Non-Stop Freight Trains, San Diego - San Francisco, Option B (6% Schedule Recovery Time Included) 4-12 5-1 Alignment Unit Costs 5-13* 5-2 Comparison of Percentage Breakdown of Construction Costs 5-13* 5-3 Comparison of Line Profiles 5-13* 5-4 Percentage Cost Distribution of Authority Option A by Line Section 5-13" * Follows th~s page [ Phase 1 Report C010337Page iv German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor EvaluationJ List of Figures Fi,qure No. Fi.qure Title Pa.qe 2-1 Structure Clearance GC for r greater 250 m 2-11 2-2 Cross Section at Grade Ballasted Track (German Railway DS 800.0130) 2-12 2-3 Cross Section at Grade Slab Track (German Railway DS 800.0130) 2-13 2-4 Trench Section Slab Track (German Railway DS 800.0130) 2-14 2-5 Provisions for Right of Way (German Railway DS 800.0130) 2-15 2-6 Typical Cross-Section of Slab Track System Rheda 2-16 3-1 Configuration of an ICE 2 385-m Version 3-2 3-2 ICE 2 Trainset on the New High Speed Line Berlin - Hanover 3-2 3-3 ICE 3 Trainset 3-4 3-4 Tractive Effort Curve and Resistances in Gradients 3-4 3-5 Configuration of ICE 3 400-m Trainset 3-5 3-6 Distributed Power Concept of the iCE 3 3-7 3-7 Train Speed Decreases on 3.5% Sustained Gradient 3-8 3-8 Train Speed Decreases on 5.0% Sustained Gradient 3-9 3-9 Class 101 Locomotive 3-11 4-1 Standard Track Layouts for Intermediate Stations 4-3 4.2 Schematic Diagram of the Cologne - Frankfurt / Main High-Speed Line 4-3 4-3 Typical Acceleration-Versus-Speed Diagram 4-4 4-4 Maximum Speed Profile Los Angeles - Bakersfield, Option A 4-5 C010338 Phase 1 Report Page v j German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor EvaluationI List of Annexes Annex No. Annex Title Pa_qe 4-1 ICE - Services (1998 / 1999) 4-16 4-2 Speed-Versus-Distance Diagrams Los Angeles - Bakersfield, Option A 4-17 4-3 Comparison of Speed-versus-Distance Diagrams Los Angeles - Bakersfield, Option A 4-18 4-4 Speed Profile San Diego- San Francisco, Option B 4-19 4-5 Approximate Longitudinal Profile San Diego - San Francisco, Option B 4-19 4-6 Page 1 Simulation Results for the Direction San Diego - San Francisco, Option B (12 Hours) 4-20 4-6 Page 2 4-21 4-7 Page 1 Timetable Graph for the Simulation from 4 a.m. to 8 a.m. 4-22 4-7 Page 2 Timetable Graph for the Simulation from 8 a.m. to 12 noon 4-23 4-7 Page 3 Timetable Graph for the Simulation from 12 noon to 4 p.m. 4-24 4-8 Page 1 Trainset Roster according to the Timetable shown in Exhibit 5-4 and Appendix C (Option B) 4-25 4-8 Page 2 4-26 4-9 Running Performance of the Trains, Option B 4-27 4-10 Maximum Speed of Freight Trains in Gradients, Initial Speed 200 km/h 4-28 4-11 Approximate Calculation of Energy Consumption 4-29 I Phase 1 Report C010339Page vi J German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation J 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objective The objective of this Phase I peer review is focused on a critical assessment of the current assumptions and parameters for planning, design and operation of a statewide high-speed rail system in California. As one of three peer review groups, the German experts have furthermore been requested to contribute to this review the special ICE experience with "mixed-use" operations. More specifically, the Authority has provided the Consultant with a list of 14 basic questions (as presented in Table 1-1 ) the answers to which constitute the bulk of this assessment. 1.2 Reports and Data Used for the Review The basis of this evaluation are the following documents and data compilations: ¯ Final Report, California High-Speed Corridor Evaluation, prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff, December 30,1999 ¯ Draft Business Plan "Building a High-Speed Train System for California", prepared by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, January 2000 ¯ Maps of the alignment alternatives, and cost, travel time and alignment data supplied by Parsons Brinckerhoff In addition, specific data and information as requested by the Consultant during this assignment were utilized. 1.3 Structure of the Peer Review Process In order to facilitate a structured review process, the wide range of issues and specific questions were assigned to four task groups as shown below: "Alignment and Permanent Way Design Criteria ¯ Design speed/horizontal curve radii ¯ Superelevation (equilibrium and unbalanced) ¯ Vertical curves ¯ Transition curves ¯ Minimum tangent length ¯ Maximum gradients (3.5% and 5.0%) ¯ Dynamic clearance envelope ¯ Minimum clearances to fixed objects (horizontal and vertical) ¯ Track centerline spacing Phase 1 Report C010340Page 1 - 1 German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor EvaluationI ¯ Minimum right-of-way requirements ¯ Special requirements for sub-standard curve radii ¯ Permanent way dimensions (ballasted and direct fixation trackways) ¯ German experience with ballasted versus direct fixation trackways ¯ Overhead catenary system Rolling Stock Issues ¯ Future ICE generations and operational speeds ¯ Maximum sustained gradients for ICE ¯ ICE acceleration and deceleration rates ¯ ICE clearance and right-of-way requirements ¯ Weight of ICE trainsets, axle loads ¯ Comparison of ICE 1/2 (locomotive-hauled type) with ICE 3 (EMU type) trainsets ¯ High-speed freight rolling stock (locomotives and wagons) ¯ Rolling stock unit costs Operations Issues ¯ Review of train running times and running time calculations for the section LA (Union Station) - Fresno (including energy consumption per train run) ¯ Review of operations and comparison with similar operations in Germany (including dwell times and schedule recovery times) ¯ Use of ICE trains by commuters; need for specialized commuter trains ¯ Description and critical assessment of freight services on ICE lines ¯ Assessment of freight compatibility of the California HSR system ¯ Assessment of O&M cost estimates Construction Unit Costs and Schedules ¯ Review of capital cost assumptions and comparison with ICE lines ¯ Review of unit cost assumptions for appropriateness and completeness in view of ICE experience ¯ Planning and construction times for ICE lines in different terrain ¯ Critical assessment of planning and construction times assumed for the California HSR system C010341 Phase 1 Report Page 1 - 2 J German Peer Review California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation J 1.4 Structure of the Report Following this introduction, the findings of our peer review are presented in four chapters covering the above subjects.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mezinárodní Komparace Vysokorychlostních Tratí
    Masarykova univerzita Ekonomicko-správní fakulta Studijní obor: Hospodářská politika MEZINÁRODNÍ KOMPARACE VYSOKORYCHLOSTNÍCH TRATÍ International comparison of high-speed rails Diplomová práce Vedoucí diplomové práce: Autor: doc. Ing. Martin Kvizda, Ph.D. Bc. Barbora KUKLOVÁ Brno, 2018 MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Ekonomicko-správní fakulta ZADÁNÍ DIPLOMOVÉ PRÁCE Akademický rok: 2017/2018 Studentka: Bc. Barbora Kuklová Obor: Hospodářská politika Název práce: Mezinárodní komparace vysokorychlostích tratí Název práce anglicky: International comparison of high-speed rails Cíl práce, postup a použité metody: Cíl práce: Cílem práce je komparace systémů vysokorychlostní železniční dopravy ve vybra- ných zemích, následné určení, který z modelů se nejvíce blíží zamýšlené vysoko- rychlostní dopravě v České republice, a ze srovnání plynoucí soupis doporučení pro ČR. Pracovní postup: Předmětem práce bude vymezení, kategorizace a rozčlenění vysokorychlostních tratí dle jednotlivých zemí, ze kterých budou dle zadaných kritérií vybrány ty státy, kde model vysokorychlostních tratí alespoň částečně odpovídá zamýšlenému sys- tému v ČR. Následovat bude vlastní komparace vysokorychlostních tratí v těchto vybraných státech a aplikace na český dopravní systém. Struktura práce: 1. Úvod 2. Kategorizace a členění vysokorychlostních tratí a stanovení hodnotících kritérií 3. Výběr relevantních zemí 4. Komparace systémů ve vybraných zemích 5. Vyhodnocení výsledků a aplikace na Českou republiku 6. Závěr Rozsah grafických prací: Podle pokynů vedoucího práce Rozsah práce bez příloh: 60 – 80 stran Literatura: A handbook of transport economics / edited by André de Palma ... [et al.]. Edited by André De Palma. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011. xviii, 904. ISBN 9781847202031. Analytical studies in transport economics. Edited by Andrew F. Daughety. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. ix, 253. ISBN 9780521268103.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheduling of Ticket Inspectors in Deutsche Bahn Inter-City Express Trains∗
    Scheduling of Ticket Inspectors in Deutsche Bahn Inter-City Express Trains∗ Nathan May1, Hai Nguyen2, and Ruby Abrams3 1Department of Mathematics, Washington State University, U.S.A. 2School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, U.K. 3Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, U.S.A. August 15, 2019 We study the underdeveloped Inspector Scheduling Problem. The Deutsche Bahn want to to maximise the number of passenger tickets inspected given already set train schedules with their limited resources, the passenger ticket inspectors. We formulate this problem as a network flow and implement this as a Mixed Integer Programme. We account for lack of data by estimating Origin-Destination Matrices and discuss complexity of the problem. We obtain empirical results of run time of the algorithm as a function of number of inspectors and conjecture that this problem is NP-hard. We also propose heuristic methods to solve this problem. Abstract Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Motivations . .2 1.2 Related Work . .3 1.3 Our Contributions . .4 1.4 Outline of Paper . .5 ∗This work was done when the three authors joined the G-RIPS 2019 Team at Zuse Institute Berlin, working on the mobile ticket inspection project sponsored in part by the Deutsche Bahn Railway Company. All authors contributed equally to this project. 1 2 Preliminaries 5 2.1 Problem Definition . .6 2.2 Dataset . .6 2.3 Assumptions and Simplifications . .7 3 Mathematical model 8 3.1 Notation . .8 3.2 Graph Representation . .8 3.3 Origin-Destination Matrix . .9 3.4 The Mixed Integer Program . 12 3.4.1 Probability of passenger inspection .
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States
    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Investigation on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of High-Speed Train Under Turbulent Crosswind
    J. Mod. Transport. (2014) 22(4):225–234 DOI 10.1007/s40534-014-0058-7 Numerical investigation on the aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train under turbulent crosswind Mulugeta Biadgo Asress • Jelena Svorcan Received: 4 March 2014 / Revised: 12 July 2014 / Accepted: 15 July 2014 / Published online: 12 August 2014 Ó The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Increasing velocity combined with decreasing model were in good agreement with the wind tunnel data. mass of modern high-speed trains poses a question about Both the side force coefficient and rolling moment coeffi- the influence of strong crosswinds on its aerodynamics. cients increase steadily with yaw angle till about 50° before Strong crosswinds may affect the running stability of high- starting to exhibit an asymptotic behavior. Contours of speed trains via the amplified aerodynamic forces and velocity magnitude were also computed at different cross- moments. In this study, a simulation of turbulent crosswind sections of the train along its length for different yaw flows over the leading and end cars of ICE-2 high-speed angles. The result showed that magnitude of rotating vortex train was performed at different yaw angles in static and in the lee ward side increased with increasing yaw angle, moving ground case scenarios. Since the train aerodynamic which leads to the creation of a low-pressure region in the problems are closely associated with the flows occurring lee ward side of the train causing high side force and roll around train, the flow around the train was considered as moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicable Directivity Description of Railway Noise Sources
    THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Applicable Directivity Description of Railway Noise Sources XUETAO ZHANG Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division of Applied Acoustics, Vibroacoustic Group CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2010 Applicable Directivity Description of Railway Noise Sources XUETAO ZHANG ISBN 978-91-7385-416-0 © Xuetao Zhang, 2010 Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola Ny serie nr 3097 ISSN 0346-718X Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division of Applied Acoustics Chalmers University of Technology SE – 412 96 Göteborg Sweden Tel: +46 (0) 31-772 2200 Fax: +46 (0) 31-772 2212 Cover: 3D directivity pattern of a perpendicular dipole pair, viewed along the axis of the red dipole component which is 4 dB weaker than the blue one. Printed by Chalmers Reproservice Göteborg, Sweden, 2010 ii Applicable Directivity Description of Railway Noise Sources XUETAO ZHANG Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division of Applied Acoustics Chalmers University of Technology Abstract For a sound source, directivity is an important parameter to specify. This parameter also reflects the physical feature of the sound generation mechanism. For example, turbulence sound is of quadrupole directivity while fluid-structure interaction often produces a sound of dipole characteristic. Therefore, to reach a proper directivity description is in fact a process of understanding the sound source in a better way. However, in practice, this is often not a simple procedure. As for railway noise engineering, several noise types of different directivity characters are often mixed together, such as wheel and rail radiation, engine and cooling fan noise, scattered fluid sound around bogies and turbulent boundary layer noise along train side surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Velaro D – New ICE 3 (Series 407)
    Fact sheet: Velaro D – New ICE 3 (Series 407) Velaro D profile . The Velaro D is the fourth generation of high-speed trains that Siemens has developed on the basis of the Velaro platform. Deutsche Bahn AG (DB) classifies the train as the new Series 407 ICE 3 (predecessors: Series 403 and Series 406 ICE 3). While the Series 403 and 406 ICE 3 were built by a consortium with Bombardier, the Velaro D was fully developed by Siemens. For the first time, the manufacturer is in charge of the official approval process for the trains. In December 2013, Germany’s Federal Railway Authority (EBA) approved the trains’ operation – also in multiple-unit or so-called double-traction mode – on the Deutsche Bahn rail network. Passenger operation started on December 21, 2013. Authorization for operation with uncoupled trains in France was obtained on April 1st, 2015. Open access was permitted on April 14, 2015. Since June 2015 the trains have been travelling to Paris in regular passenger operation. In addition to Germany and France, the Velaro D is also intended for cross-border operation in Belgium. The approval process in this country is still in progress. Technical data of the Velaro D (per train) Maximum operating speed 320 kilometers per hour (alternating current) Length 200 meters Number of cars per train 8 Seating (excl. 16 bistro seats) 444 / 111 / 333 (total / 1st class / 2nd class) Curb weight 454 tons Operating temperature range -25 °C to +45 °C Traction power 8,000 kilowatts (11,000 hp) Velaro platform . Since 2007, trains based on the Velaro platform have operated with high reliability for more than one billion kilometers in China, Russia, Spain and Turkey – equal to roughly 25,000 times around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry
    Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry Michael Renner and Gary Gardner Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry Michael Renner and Gary Gardner September 2010 2 GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS IN THE RAIL AND TRANSIT INDUSTRY © 2010 Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C. Printed on paper that is 50 percent recycled, 30 percent post-consumer waste, process chlorine free. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Worldwatch Institute; of its directors, officers, or staff; or of its funding organizations. Editor: Lisa Mastny Designer: Lyle Rosbotham Table of Contents 3 Table of Contents Summary . 7 U.S. Rail and Transit in Context . 9 The Global Rail Market . 11 Selected National Experiences: Europe and East Asia . 16 Implications for the United States . 27 Endnotes . 30 Figures and Tables Figure 1. National Investment in Rail Infrastructure, Selected Countries, 2008 . 11 Figure 2. Leading Global Rail Equipment Manufacturers, Share of World Market, 2001 . 15 Figure 3. Leading Global Rail Equipment Manufacturers, by Sales, 2009 . 15 Table 1. Global Passenger and Freight Rail Market, by Region and Major Industry Segment, 2005–2007 Average . 12 Table 2. Annual Rolling Stock Markets by Region, Current and Projections to 2016 . 13 Table 3. Profiles of Major Rail Vehicle Manufacturers . 14 Table 4. Employment at Leading Rail Vehicle Manufacturing Companies . 15 Table 5. Estimate of Needed European Urban Rail Investments over a 20-Year Period . 17 Table 6. German Rail Manufacturing Industry Sales, 2006–2009 . 18 Table 7. Germany’s Annual Investments in Urban Mass Transit, 2009 . 19 Table 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Experiences with Onboard Diagnosis System for High Speed Trains
    Operational Experiences with Onboard Diagnosis System for High Speed Trains R. Sunder, A. Kolbasseff, K. Kieninger, A. Röhm, J. Walter Institute for Safety Technology (ISTec) GmbH Forschungsgelände, 85748 Garching, Federal Republic of Germany 1. INTRODUCTION The primary objective of the project “Onboard diagnosis system for high-speed trains” is to guarantee the high availability of InterCity-Express (ICE) trains during the whole lifetime using condition based maintenance procedures. This ensures also a significant improvement of operational safety of railway vehicles. The detailed specification of an InterCity-Express onboard diagnosis system requires therefore the establishment of broad basis of data and knowledge to determine appropriate sensor positions, measuring principles, assessment algorithms and failure-specific features. Condition monitoring algorithms were tested by failure simulations with ICE trailers on the track. A prototype onboard diagnosis system was specified, realised and installed – operational experiences and lessons learned will be presented. 2. SCOPE OF ICE ONBOARD DIAGNOSIS As a subcontractor of Deutsche Bahn AG, ISTec started in 1999 with generic investigations on incipient failure detection methods for high speed trains. One issue of this contract was a certain know-how transfer from diagnosis systems developed for pump and turbines in nuclear technology to InterCity Express vehicles. From the early beginning it was evident, that there were basic differences between pumps and trains concerning the excitation functions: Stationary operating machines normally are forced by random and steady-state excitations, trains in operation are affected by a mixture of non-linear excitations and transient effects like impacts from the track. Furthermore, trains are running with different speeds on different roadways.
    [Show full text]
  • The ICE 4 the New Flagship of the DB AG in the Exact Scale 1:87
    PIKO vehicle information 1:87 booklet 6/2019 The ICE 4 The new flagship of the DB AG in the exact scale 1:87 Also available as sound versions for direct and alternating current Electric multiple unit Class 412 / 812, ICE 4 Picture: M. Fröhlich In 2011, the Deutsche Bahn AG assigned Siemens Mobility with the construction of up to 300 new high-speed trains the use in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The new Class 412/812 trains, which are being jointly developed by Siemens and Bombardier, will be powered by several power cars. The train configuration provides for various modular units ranging from five-car to 14-car trains. This concept allows the train to be easily adapted to the individual requirements of the transport companies for the desired acceleration, speed and number of seats. To date, the DB has ordered 85 twelve-car and 45 seven-car multiple units in the basic configuration, consisting of tractionless end and control cars, powered seating cars and on-board bistro as well as non-driven seating, dining and service cars. The seven-car multiple unit train has three powered cars and offers 456 seats over a length of 200 meters. A twelve-car multiple unit has six powered cars and 830 seats over a length of 346 metres. The maximum speed is 250 km/h. The external shape was based on the existing ICE fleet and further developed. Since December 2017, the first 12-car trains have been in regular service on the Hamburg-Würzburg, Stuttgart-Munich and Hamburg-Berlin-Munich lines.
    [Show full text]
  • A MTAK Kiadványai 47. Budapest, 1966
    A MAGYAR TUDOMÁNYOS AKADÉMIA KÖNYVTARÁNAK KÖZLEMÉNYEI PUBLICATIONES BIBLIOTHECAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE 47. INDEX ÀCRONYMORUM SELECTORUM Institute* communicationis BUDAPEST, 1966 VOCABULARIUM ABBREVIATURARUM BIBLIOTHECARII III Index acronymorum selectorum 7. Instituta communicationis A MAGYAR TUDOMÁNYOS AKADÉMIA KÖNYVTARÁNAK KÖZLEMÉNYEI PUBLICATIONES BIBLIOTHECAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE 47. VOCABULARIUM ABBREVIATURARUM BIBLIOTHECARII Index acronymorum selectorum 7. Instituta communicationis BUDAPEST, 196 6 A MAGYAR TUDOMÁNYOS AKADÉMIA KÖNYVTARÁNAK KÖZLEMÉNYEI PUBLICATIONES BIBLIOTHECAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE 47. INDEX ACRONYMORUM SELECTORUM 7 Instituta communications. BUDAPEST, 1966 INDEX ACRONYMORUM SELECTORUM Pars. 7. Instituta communicationis. Adiuvantibus EDIT BODNÁ R-BERN ÁT H et MAGDA TULOK collegit et edidit dr. phil. ENDRE MORAVEK Lectores: Gyula Tárkányi Sámuel Papp © 1966 MTA Köynvtára F. к.: Rózsa György — Kiadja a MTA Könyvtára — Példányszám: 750 Alak A/4. - Terjedelem 47'/* A/5 ív 65395 - M.T.A. KESz sokszorosító v ELŐSZÓ "Vocabularium abbreviaturarum bibliothecarii" cimü munkánk ez ujabb füzete az "Index acronymorum selectorum" kötet részeként, a köz- lekedési és hírközlési intézmények /ilyen jellegű állami szervek, vasu- tak, légiközlekedési vállalatok, távirati irodák, sajtóügynökségek stb/ névröviditéseit tartalmazza. Az idevágó felsőbb fokú állami intézmények /pl. minisztériumok stb./ nevének acronymáit, amelyeket az "Instituta rerum publicarum" c. kötetben közöltünk, technikai okokból nem
    [Show full text]
  • Fernfahrplan 2012 Langfassung
    Jürgen Lorenz 17. November 2011 Vorschau auf den Fernfahrplan 2012 Auch das Fahrplanjahr 2012 ist durch Auswirkungen aus Bautätigkeiten geprägt. Für längerfristige Gleiserneuerungen und –umbauten werden Baukorridore (Bk) eingerichtet. Sie führen zu vielen zeitlich befristeten Ersatzmaßnahmen, oftmals mit deutlichen Fahrzeitverlängerungen. Abweichungen sind im Ansatz erwähnt. Die Streckenhöchstgeschwindigkeit von 230 km/h auf dem viergleisigen Abschnitt Olching – Augsburg wird ab dem Fahrplan 2012 genutzt. Zwischen Stelle und Ashausen stehen vier Gleise zur Verfügung. Ab dem 10. Juni 2012 wird auch der Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg International an den Schienenfernverkehr angeschlossen. ICE-Linie 1 Sprinter Köln – Hamburg ICE-Linie 3 Sprinter Berlin – Frankfurt (Main) Auf diesen Linien gibt es keine Veränderungen im Angebot. ICE-Linie 4 Sprinter Hamburg – Darmstadt Die im letzten Fahrplanjahr eingeführte Verlängerung des ICE 1097 an Fr über Darmstadt hinaus bis Saarbrücken wird zurückgenommen. ICE-Linie 10 Bonn – Berlin ICE 841 begann bisher am Mo in Bielefeld. Der Zug wird ab dem Fahrplanwechsel Mo ab Oldenburg (Oldb) Hbf und Di-Fr ab Bremen Hbf gefahren. ICE 557 Sa/ICE 855 Mo-Fr sowie ICE 858 So-Fr entfallen zwischen Trier und Köln Hbf bzw. Koblenz und Trier. Die Verkehrstage bei ICE 947 zwischen Köln und Düsseldorf werden auf Mo-Sa erweitert, bei ICE 957 jedoch auf So reduziert. Bis zum 31. März werden im Rahmen des Winterprogramms mehrere ICE 2- Leistungen durch ICE 1 bzw. ICE-T ersetzt. Dabei handelt es sich um ICE 951/941 Fr+So sowie ICE 944/954, die durch die Baureihe 401 als ICE 1041 Mo-Do+Sa/ICE 1044 von/nach Köln Hbf ergänzt werden.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We Were Able to Increase Our Transport Performance in Passenger and Freight Transport Significantly in 2000
    Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We were able to increase our transport performance in passenger and freight transport significantly in 2000. Positive Income Development Our operating income after interest improved by € 286 million. Modernization of Deutsche Bahn AG A comprehensive fitness program and the expansion of our capital expenditures will pave the way to our becoming an even more effective railway. Key figures Change in € million 2000 1999 in % Revenues 15,465 15,630 – 1.1 Revenues (comparable) 15,465 14,725 + 5.0 Income before taxes 37 91 – 59.3 Income after taxes 85 87 – 2.3 EBITDA 2,502 2,036 + 22.9 EBIT 450 71 + 533.8 Operating income after net interest 199 – 87 + 328.7 Return on capital employed in % 1.6 0.3 – Fixed assets 34,671 33,495 + 3.5 Total assets 39,467 37,198 + 6.1 Equity 8,788 8,701 + 1.0 Cash flow (before taxes) 2,113 2,107 + 0.3 Gross capital expenditures 6,892 8,372 – 17.7 Net capital expenditures 1) 3,250 3,229 + 0.7 Employees (as of Dec 31) 222,656 241,638 – 7.9 Performance figures Change Passenger Transport 2000 1999 in % Passengers DB Reise&Touristik million 144.8 146.5 – 1.2 DB Regio million 1,567.7 1,533.6 + 2.2 Total million 1,712.5 1,680.1 + 1.9 Passenger kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million pkm 2) 36,226 34,897 + 3.8 DB Regio million pkm 2) 38,162 37,949 + 0.6 Total million pkm 2) 74,388 72,846 + 2.1 Train kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million train-path km 175.9 177.5 – 0.9 DB Regio million train-path km 563.9 552.4 + 2.1 Total million train-path km 739.8 729.9 + 1.4 Freight Transport
    [Show full text]