DOCSLIB.ORG

NORDEFCO Annual Report 2018 3 Foreword NORDEFCO in a Nutshell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NORDEFCO Annual Report 2018 3 Foreword NORDEFCO in a Nutshell www.nordefco.org Content 4 Foreword 5 NORDEFCO in a Nutshell Capabilities – COPA CAPA Armaments – COPA ARMA Human Resources and Education – COPA HR&E Training and Exercises – COPA TEX Operations – COPA OPS 7 Norwegian Chairmanship Priorities and Results 9 NORDEFCO Meetings and Events in 2018 10 2018: Results and Activities Air Surveillance Easy Access Human Resources Cross Border Training and Artic Challenge Exercise Nordic Combat Uniform System 12 Nordic Defence Activities, Exercises and Operations From the Ministerial Meeting in Bergen, Norway, 10-11 April 2018 14 Joint Nordic Op-Ed on Trident Juncture We will improve our defence capability and cooperation in peace, crisis and conflict. 17 Nordic Defence Cooperation Vision 2025 We ensure a close Nordic political and military dialogue on security and defence. Acknowledging our different security affiliations, we pursue an agenda based on joint security perspectives, efficient and cost-effective cooperation to strengthen our national defences and the ability to act together. Editors: Kåre Emil Brændeland and Paul André Narvestad, Norwegian Ministry of Defence From the new NORDEFCO Vision 2025, signed by the Nordic Design & illustrations: Tobias Syvertsen, Norwegian Armed Forces Media Centre Project Managers: Claus Andreas Østby and Tove R. Fjeld, Norwegian Armed Forces Media Centre (ref:1555) Ministers of Defence in Oslo on 13 November 2018. Photos: Swedish Armed Forces, Norwegian Armed Forces, Danish Armed Forces, Finnish Defence Forces Print & Circulation: 240g and 120g, Munken Polar Published by the Norwegian chairmanship of NORDEFCO February 2019 2 NORDEFCO Annual Report 2018 3 Foreword NORDEFCO in a Nutshell As the decennial anniversary of the NORDEFCO approach- to draw special attention to our es, it is worth recalling the substantial progress the Nordic new NORDEFCO Vision 2025. I Ministers of Defence defence cooperation has made in recent years. We have am particularly satisfied that ambitiously strengthened our cooperation, but remained the vision clearly states that realistic. There is strong political support for more Nordic we will improve our defence Policy Steering Committe (PSC) defence cooperation. External developments, such as a capability and cooperation Policy Operations Capabilities Armaments more militarily assertive Russia, also underline the need in peace, crisis and conflict. for joint eort. We all agree that a serious security de- This is an important guide go- PSC Secretariat (PSC(S)) velopment in the northernmost corner of Europe would ing forward, supplemented by aect all Nordic countries. This is a powerful reminder of concrete targets concerning our Military Coordination Committee (MCC) Chiefs of Defence (CHODS) the importance of our cooperation. There are dierences future cooperation related to interna- among the NORDEFCO members when it comes to de- tional operations, training and exercises, logistics and de- Coordination staff (CS) fence and security policies and capability development fence procurement and capability development. We also processes. However, despite these divergences, the Nor- emphasize the importance of the transatlantic relation- Cooperation Areas (COPAs) dic countries have cooperated and found pragmatic and ship and continued consultations with our Baltic neigh- flexible solutions, while at the same time respecting each bours. I believe this new vision is appropriate to our region and is a response to the changing security environment in country’s models and standards. Through Nordic and Nor- Human Resources Traning and dic-Baltic cooperation, Norway derives increased insight which we find ourselves. When comparing the previous vi- Capabilities Armaments Operations and understanding as a third country in EU security and sion to this one, I believe it is clear that the Nordic defence and Education Exercises defence aairs. This contributes to NORDEFCO’s role as cooperation has come a long way. The Nordic countries an important aspect of Norway’s broader defence coop- have in 2018 demonstrated their ability to cooperate be- eration. To strengthen the Nordic defence cooperation, yond the NORDEFCO structure. In October and Novem- the Norwegian 2018 chairmanship has actively sought ber, NATO conducted its largest exercise in years. Exercise Cooperation Areas to introduce new plans and objectives, while continuing Trident Juncture brought together more than 50,000 important ongoing projects. We pursued a new Vision for personnel from 31 NATO and partner countries to train NORDEFCO towards 2025 and explored the possibility of in Norway. A significant portion of the participants was ORDEFCO activities and projects are diverse and numerous, covering a wide spectrum of areas and func- cooperating on autonomous unmanned systems and the from the Nordic countries, totalling more than 13,000 tions necessary for national defences. To make sure the nations are directly engaged and involved with their space domain. In international operations, the Nordic de- soldiers. The Nordic countries have dierent alliance com- Nnational expertise, NORDEFCO projects and activities are primarily managed through five cooperation areas fence cooperation is present in Mali by supplying trans- mitments. While Denmark, Iceland and Norway are NATO (COPAs) where nations participate with relevant experts with national mandates. When the NORDEFCO processes port aircras to MINUSMA within a rotational scheme members, Finland and Sweden are close partners through are completed, projects are handed over to the same national line organisations for implementation and use. Lead- and several Nordic countries, with Sweden as the lead the Enhanced Opportunity Partners programme. Through ership of the COPAs rotate between Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, normally every second year. nation, have pledged a contribution to Mobile Training the inclusion of Sweden and Finland in NATO exercises we Teams. Ongoing projects such as the exchange of radar are able to improve our ability to act together in a conflict Cooperation area (COPA) 2017-2018 2019-2020 data (NORECAS), were taken forward this year when the situation if ever needed. I would like to thank all the Nordic Capabilities (CAPA) Denmark Finland Nordic Air Chiefs signed a technical arrangement late in countries for contributing to the NATO exercise. The exer- 2018 to implement the Memorandum of Understanding cise was a major success and demonstrated the geopolit- Armaments (ARMA) Denmark Sweden from 2017. A secure communication VTC – system includ- ical importance of Europe’s northern flank. I hope you will Human Resources and Education (HR&E) ing all five Nordic countries became fully operational. This find this annual report on the Nordic defence cooperation Norway Sweden informative. I will also take this opportunity to thank my enables confidential communication on short notice. The Training and Exercises (TEX) Finland Denmark joint acquisition of Nordic combat uniforms, where we Nordic colleagues for contributing to the achievements aim to procure a common uniform system diering only attained this year. I look forward to the coming year under Operations (OPS) Sweden Norway in camouflage pattern, is progressing according to plan. In the Swedish chairmanship of NORDEFCO. addition, the work on Easy Access has simplified military movement between our countries for training and exer- Capabilities - COPA CAPA cises. Underpinning this work is our regular dialogue on se- curity policy to promote awareness and exchange of views The operational ability of national defences depends on its capabilities, the organisations and systems that com- between the Nordic countries. Looking forward, I want Frank Bakke-Jensen bine personnel and their knowledge and abilities with equipment, material and infrastructure. COPA CAPA looks Minister of Defence, Norway for opportunities to improve national defences by developing and improving existing capabilities, and creating new ones. 4 NORDEFCO Annual Report 2018 5 NORDEFCO Meetings and Events in 2018 Nordic-Baltic Chiefs of Defence 31 January Copenhagen Chiefs of Defence- Military 7-8 March Coordination Committee Oslo Policy Steering Committee 20-21 March Oslo 10-11 April Ministerial Meeting Bergen Nordic Defence Industry Seminar 22-24 May NorSat-1 was launched in July 2014, and uses an Automatic Identification System (AIS) receiver to track maritime trac. Stockholm State- and Permanent 12 June Secretary Meeting Oslo 4) Explore the issue of Autonomous Unmanned Systems(AUS) IFS/NUPI Seminar on Nordic Defence Cooperation in a New The development of Autonomous Unmanned Systems is in demand, and is already in use in some military capabil- Security Environment. ities. Norway led a study to research the various domestic policies on AUS as well as possibilities for cooperation. 26 June The exploratory study on AUS, which was presented at the ministerial meeting in November, provided increased Oslo awareness and an overview of Nordic countries’ ambitions, plans and policies in regards to AUS and provided a Chiefs of Defence and National platform for increased cooperation in the coming years. One of the findings in this study is that the Nordic coun- 24 August Armaments Directors Meeting tries have no overarching policies or strategies concerning Autonomous Unmanned Systems. There have been Bergen identified opportunities for cooperation in dierent areas, including education/courses as well as training and exercises. Chairman of the Military Coordination Committee addressed the OSCE FSC on 5) Explore possibilities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Selection Process for the Bulgarian Special Forces
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2019-12 ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE BULGARIAN SPECIAL FORCES Vlahov, Petar Georgiev Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/64090 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE BULGARIAN SPECIAL FORCES by Petar Georgiev Vlahov December 2019 Thesis Advisor: Kalev I. Sepp Second Reader: Michael Richardson Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Form Approved OMB REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED (Leave blank) December 2019 Master’s thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE BULGARIAN SPECIAL FORCES 6. AUTHOR(S) Petar Georgiev Vlahov 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Training and Simulation
    Food for thought 05-2021 Training and Simulation Written by AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY the Research team of Finabel European Army Interoperability Center This study was written under the guidance of the Swedish presidency, headed by MG Engelbrektson, Commander of the Swedish Army. Special thanks go out to all ex- perts providing their insights on the topic, including but not limited too: MAJ Ulrik Hansson-Mild, Mr Henrik Reimer, SSG Joel Gustafsson, Mr Per Hagman, Robert Wilsson, MAJ Björn Lahger and SGM Anders Jakobsson.This study was drawn up by the Research team of Finabel over the course of a few months, including: Cholpon Abdyraeva, Paolo d'Alesio, Florinda Artese, Yasmine Benchekroun, Antoine Decq, Luca Dilda, Enzo Falsanisi, Vlad Melnic, Oliver Noyan, Milan Storms, Nadine Azi- hane, Dermot Nolan under the guidance of Mr Mario Blokken, Director of the Per- manent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. All our studies are available on www.finabel.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Data Utilisation, the Need for Standardisation and Obstacles 33 Cultural Interoperability 4 Introduction 33 Introduction 4 9. What is Data? 34 1. Exercises as Means to 10. Political Aspects: National Deter Opposition 5 Interests vs. Interoperability 34 2. Current Trends in SBT 13 11. Data Interoperability 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Strategies of the Smaller NATO States – a Comparative Study Obranné Strategie Malých Států NATO – Komparativní Studie
    Vojenské rozhledy č. 4/2020 DOI: 10.3849/2336-2995.29.2020.04.023-045 Peer-reviewed Defence strategies of the smaller NATO states – a comparative study Obranné strategie malých států NATO – komparativní studie Lukáš Dyčka, Taivo Rõkk, Zdzisław Śliwa Abstract: Defence strategies of smaller NATO states represent interesting source of information about defence policies of this pool of countries. Definition of what constitutes “small state” is discussed in first step. In second step, this study compares 10 selected NATO countries Defence Strategies in terms of identified risks and threats, future military capabilities to counter threats, processes of drafting defence papers, level of details and approving authorities. Outlining these indicators and characteristics provide useful overview for future draft of National defence strategies within countries of similar size. Abstrakt: Obranné strategie malých států NATO představují důležitý zdroj infor- mací o obranné politice. Definice “malého státu” je však nejasná a její zpřesnění představuje první část článku. Ve druhé části pak text srov- nává Obranné strategie deseti vybraných malých států NATO z pohledu hrozeb, budoucích vojenských schopností, procesu tvorby dokumentů, úrovně detailu a úrovně, na které je dokument schvalován. Přehledné se- řazení těchto poznatků pak potenciálně může sloužit jako vhodný základ a inspirace při tvorbě obranných strategií menších států. Key words: Defence; strategy; strategic documents; small states; military capabilities; NATO. Klíčová slova: Obranná strategie; koncepční dokumenty; malý stat; vojenské schopnos- ti; NATO. 23 Vojenské rozhledy č. 4/2020 Defence strategies of the smaller NATO states INTRODUCTION The re-emergence of the use of military power in the Eastern Europe after annexation of Crimea has again created a dilemma of making choices within defence policy of small states.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway: Defence 2008
    Norwegian Defence 2008 Norwegian Defence 2008 2 CONTENT NORWEGIAN SECURITY And DEFEncE POLICY 4 1. Security Policy Objectives 5 Defence Policy Objectives 5 2. Defence Tasks 6 3. Areas of Government Focus 7 4. International Cooperation 8 UN 8 NATO 9 EU 10 Nordic cooperation 11 5. National Cooperation 12 DEFEncE STRUCTURE And AcTIVITIES 14 1. Constitutional Division of Responsibility in Norway 15 2. The Strategic Leadership of the Armed Forces 15 The Ministry Of Defence 16 3. The Defence Agencies 17 The Norwegian Armed Forces 17 4. The Norwegian Armed Forces 18 5. The Service Branches 19 The Norwegian Army 19 The Royal Norwegian Navy 20 Royal Norwegian Air Force 21 Home Guard 22 6. Personnel Policy 23 7. National Service 23 8. Materiel and Investments 24 Overview of Forces Engaged in International Operations 25 SUppLEMENt – THE FACTS 26 1. The Defence Budget 27 2. International Operations 27 3. Ranks and Insignia 28 4. Non-Governmental Organisations 29 5. Addresses 32 Norwegian Security and Defence Policy 4 1. SECURITY POLICY OBJECTIVES The principal objective of Norwegian security policy is to safeguard and promote national security policy interests. This is best achieved by contributing to peace, security and stability both in areas adjacent to Norway and in the wider world. Nationally Norway must be in a position to uphold its sovereignty and sove- reign rights and to exercise authority in order to safeguard our interests. At the same time, the progress of globalisation means that geo- graphical distance is no longer a determining factor for potential threats to our security.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Defence Forces International Centre the Many Faces of Military
    Finnish Defence Forces International Finnish Defence Forces Centre 2 The Many Faces of Military Crisis Management Lessons from the Field Edited by Mikaeli Langinvainio Finnish Defence Forces FINCENT Publication Series International Centre 1:2011 1 FINNISH DEFENCE FORCES INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FINCENT PUBLICATION SERIES 1:2011 The Many Faces of Military Crisis Management Lessons from the Field EDITED BY MIKAELI LANGINVAINIO FINNISH DEFENCE FORCES INTERNATIONAL CENTRE TUUSULA 2011 2 Mikaeli Langinvainio (ed.): The Many Faces of Military Crisis Management Lessons from the Field Finnish Defence Forces International Centre FINCENT Publication Series 1:2011 Cover design: Harri Larinen Layout: Heidi Paananen/TKKK Copyright: Puolustusvoimat, Puolustusvoimien Kansainvälinen Keskus ISBN 978–951–25–2257–6 ISBN 978–951–25–2258–3 (PDF) ISSN 1797–8629 Printed in Finland Juvenens Print Oy Tampere 2011 3 Contents Jukka Tuononen Preface .............................................................................................5 Mikaeli Langinvainio Introduction .....................................................................................8 Mikko Laakkonen Military Crisis Management in the Next Decade (2020–2030) ..............................................................12 Antti Häikiö New Military and Civilian Training - What can they learn from each other? What should they learn together? And what must both learn? .....................................................................................20 Petteri Kurkinen Concept for the PfP Training
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC FORUM National Defense University
    January 2020 STRATEGIC FORUM National Defense University About the Authors Håkon Lunde Saxi, Ph.D., is an As- Baltics Left of Bang: Nordic sociate Professor at the Norwegian Defence University College. Bengt Total Defense and Implications Sundelius is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the Swedish Defense University. Brett Swaney is an for the Baltic Sea Region Assistant Research Fellow in the Center for Strategic Research, Institute for Na- tional Strategic Studies, at the National by Håkon Lunde Saxi, Bengt Sundelius, and Brett Defense University. Swaney Key Points ponsored by the U.S. National Defense University (NDU) and the Swed- ish National Defense University, this paper is the second in a series of ◆◆ Nordic states (Norway, Sweden, and Finland) efforts to enhance Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Forums dedicated to societal resilience through unique the multinational exploration of the strategic and defense challenges faced by “total defense” and “comprehen- S sive security” initiatives are unlikely the Baltic states. The December 2017 U.S. National Security Strategy described to change the near-term strategic Russia as “using subversive measures to weaken the credibility of America’s com- calculus of Russia. Over time, how- ever, a concerted application of to- mitment to Europe, undermine transatlantic unity, and weaken European insti- tal defense in harmony with Article tutions and governments.”1 The U.S. and European authors of this paper, along 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty will with many others, came together in late 2017 to explore possible responses to aid in the resilience to, and deter- rence of, Russian hostile measures the security challenges facing the Baltic Sea Region (BSR).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of the Operational Level of War in Norway Halvor Johansen Operations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by FHS Brage DEFENCE AND SECURITY STUDIES STUDIES SECURITY AND DEFENCE DEFENCE AND SECURITY STUDIES DEFENCE AND SECURITY STUDIES 2 2009 The rise and decline of the Operational Level of War in Halvor Johansen Norway The rise and decline of Once the hub of Norwegian defence have been addressed mainly by using planning, the Norwegian opera- technological or political science tional level plays a less signifi cant approaches. By adding social theory 2009 2 the Operational Level of role today. e operational level is to the perspectives this book also the link between the strategic and highlights the importance of civil- War in Norway tactical levels, adapting political and military relations and popular politi- strategic ends to feasible plans and cal support as a base of legitimacy Johansen Halvor Norway in War of Level Operational the of decline and rise The operations. is book looks at vari- for building and main taining mili- ous questions regarding the develop- tary institutions. Although the book ment of the operational level. How looks specifi cally at a development were the key institutions built up? specifi c to Norway, it also describes an And which events made them less sig- international trend experienced by a nifi cant? T raditionally, these questions number of military organisations. Lieutenant Colonel Halvor Johansen holds an MA in military studies from the Norwegian Defence University College (2007). He gradu- ated from the Norwegian Army Military Academy in 1993 and has had a variety of command and staff assignments.
    [Show full text]
  • Conscription in the European Union Armed Forces: National Trends, Benefits and EU Modernised Service
    Food for thought 07-2019 Conscription in the European Union Armed Forces: National Trends, Benefits and EU Modernised Service Written by AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY European Army Interoperability Center Joeri Rongé and Giulia Abrate This paper was drawn up by Joeri Rongé and Giulia Abrate, under the supervision and guidance of the Director of the Permanent Secretariat, Mr. Mario Blokken. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states, but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Part one: The concept of conscription and the EU’ situation 4 Part two: The relevance of universal conscription 10 Promoting equality between genders and social-economic statuses 11 Economic results 12 The efficiency of armies 13 Part three: Conscription in the changing nature of war 15 Part four: The way forward, the European Union Service 20 The “European Security and Defence Studies” 21 The “EU Military Service” 22 The European Voluntary Service 25 Conclusion 27 Bibliography 28 Conscription in the European Union Armed Forces: National Trends, Benefits and EU Modernised Service 2 INTRODUCTION During the 19th and 20th centuries, most Secondly, the paper will delineate the argu- countries, whether authoritarian or not, en- ments in favour and against conscription. visaged conscription in order to involve the Having a global vision of the advantages and citizenry in their armies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges and Dynamics of Alliance Policies: Norway, NATO and the High North Wrenn Yennie Lindgren & Nina Græger
    7 The Challenges and Dynamics of Alliance Policies: Norway, NATO and the High North Wrenn Yennie Lindgren & Nina Græger This chapter sets out to discuss two major framework conditions for Norwegian foreign, security and defence policy: North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the High North.1 Having to address increasingly heterogeneous security concerns and agendas, how do alliances shape their members’ foreign, security and defence policies? And how do the specific challenges related to the High North, such as Russia and other states’ policy agendas, form Norwegian responses and policies? In answering these questions, we aim to explore the framework conditions in a contemporary and historical context. Apart from contributing to the literature on Norway and NATO, we endeavour to add value to the general understanding of small states’ foreign and security policy enablers and constraints.2 1 The term ‘High North’ (nordområdene) often appears in Norwegian Government documents and is used interchangeably with ‘Arctic’. It does not refer solely to Norwegian territory, but is rather a broad concept that attempts to capture developments in the wider circumpolar area. See Jonas Gahr Støre, ‘The High North and the Arctic: The Norwegian Perspective’, Arctic Herald, Moskva, no. 2, Jun. 2012, www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/nord_arktis/id685072/. 2 Christine Ingebritsen, ‘Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s Role in World Politics’, in Christine Ingebritsen, Iver Neumann & Sieglinde Gstohl (eds), Small States in International Relations, Reykjavik: University of Iceland Press, 2006, pp. 273–85; Anders Wivel, Clive Archer & Alyson JK Bailes, ‘Setting the Scene: Small States in International Security’, in Clive Archer, Alyson JK Bailes & Anders Wivel (eds), Small States and International Security: Europe and Beyond, London: Routledge, 2014, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectoral Qualifications Framework for the Military Officer Profession 
    Sectoral Qualifications Framework for the Military Officer Profession SQF-MILOF VOL 01 We inspire, we train, we challenge! This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the European Security and Defence College (ESDC) and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Edited by Col (RO A) Alin BODESCU, PhD, ESDC Training Manager Reviewed by: Dr Sylvain PAILE-CALVO: Senior Researcher in European Studies, University of Liège, Belgium Mrs. Joana CALDEIRA: Higher Education Expert, Ministry of Defence, Portugal Mr. Nelson Davide SILVA REIS: Higher Education Expert, Ministry of Defence, Portugal Col (IT A) Gianluca CARRIERO: Joint Education Coordination Officer, Centre for Defence Higher How to use this publication? Studies, Italy The Sectoral Qualifications Framework for the Military Officer Profession - SQF-MILOF package is published in two volumes. Volume 1 describes the SQF-MILOF rationale and context and the development, validation and roadmaps for implementation. It has both historical and documentary value. Volume 2 is more technical, where interested practitioners can find useful information such as the Competence Profile or the taxonomy of learning outcomes in the tabular format of the SQF-MILOF and MILOF-CORE. Neither the European Security and Defence College nor any person acting on behalf of the European Security and Defence College is responsible for the use that might be made of the following information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021 © European Security and Defence College, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Policy and the Armed Forces During the Pandemic Herunterladen
    1 2 3 2020, Toms Rostoks and Guna Gavrilko In cooperation with the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung With articles by: Thierry Tardy, Michael Jonsson, Dominic Vogel, Elisabeth Braw, Piotr Szyman- ski, Robin Allers, Paal Sigurd Hilde, Jeppe Trautner, Henri Vanhanen and Kalev Stoicesku Language editing: Uldis Brūns Cover design and layout: Ieva Stūre Printed by Jelgavas tipogrāfija Cover photo: Armīns Janiks All rights reserved © Toms Rostoks and Guna Gavrilko © Authors of the articles © Armīns Janiks © Ieva Stūre © Uldis Brūns ISBN 978-9984-9161-8-7 4 Contents Introduction 7 NATO 34 United Kingdom 49 Denmark 62 Germany 80 Poland 95 Latvia 112 Estonia 130 Finland 144 Sweden 160 Norway 173 5 Toms Rostoks is a senior researcher at the Centre for Security and Strategic Research at the National Defence Academy of Latvia. He is also associate professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Univer- sity of Latvia. 6 Introduction Toms Rostoks Defence spending was already on the increase in most NATO and EU member states by early 2020, when the coronavirus epi- demic arrived. Most European countries imposed harsh physical distancing measures to save lives, and an economic downturn then ensued. As the countries of Europe and North America were cau- tiously trying to open up their economies in May 2020, there were questions about the short-term and long-term impact of the coro- navirus pandemic, the most important being whether the spread of the virus would intensify after the summer. With the number of Covid-19 cases rapidly increasing in September and October and with no vaccine available yet, governments in Europe began to impose stricter regulations to slow the spread of the virus.
    [Show full text]