DOCSLIB.ORG

Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit Center Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit Center Study METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD TRANSIT CENTER STUDY Final Report August 2015 Achnowledgements TBD Final Report Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit Center Study i Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background and Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................1 Public Outreach .................................................................................................................................................................1 Suitable Transit Center Site Locations ...............................................................................................................................2 Market Study Assessment .................................................................................................................................................4 Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................................................5 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Planning Process ...............................................................................................................................................................7 Document Overview ..........................................................................................................................................................9 Metropolitan Bakersfield .................................................................................................................................................11 3. Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Kern Council of Governments .........................................................................................................................................12 Bicycle Plans ..................................................................................................................................................................14 Rail Plans .........................................................................................................................................................................15 Other Applicable Documents ...........................................................................................................................................17 Public Workshop .............................................................................................................................................................19 4. Public Outreach ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Primary Site Locations .....................................................................................................................................................23 5. Suitable Transit Center Locations ..................................................................................................................... 23 Secondary Site Locations ................................................................................................................................................35 Zoning Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................37 6. TOD Market Study Assessment ......................................................................................................................... 37 TOD Market Feasibility ....................................................................................................................................................38 Projected Market Demand ...............................................................................................................................................39 Cumulative Assessment of Station Site TOD Potential....................................................................................................41 Evaluation Criteria ...........................................................................................................................................................43 7. Transit Center and TOD Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 43 Evaluation Results ...........................................................................................................................................................45 8. Conclusion and Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 47 ii Final Report Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit Center Study List of Figures Figure 1 Proposed Site Locations ....................................................................................................................................................3 Figure 2 Secondary Site Locations ..................................................................................................................................................3 Figure 3 Sustainable Communities Strategy Transit Priority Areas ................................................................................................14 Figure 4 Public Workshop 2 Results ..............................................................................................................................................22 Figure 5 Proposed Site Locations ..................................................................................................................................................25 Figure 6 Low-Income Population by TAZ .......................................................................................................................................28 Figure 7 Projected 2040 Population by TAZ ...................................................................................................................................29 Figure 8 Projected Employment by TAZ ........................................................................................................................................30 Figure 9 Existing Transit ................................................................................................................................................................31 Figure 10 Secondary Site Locations ..............................................................................................................................................36 Figure 11 Zoning Distribution .........................................................................................................................................................38 Figure 12 Transit Center Site Evaluation Matrix .............................................................................................................................46 List of Tables Table 1 Zoning Potential for TOD ....................................................................................................................................................4 Table 2 Evaluation Criteria Matrix ....................................................................................................................................................5 Table 3 Summary of RTP Projects .................................................................................................................................................13 Table 4 Kern Transit Bus Operations ..............................................................................................................................................16 Table 5 Existing Demographics .....................................................................................................................................................26 Table 6 Projected Demographics ...................................................................................................................................................27 Table 7 TOD Market Feasibility Criteria .........................................................................................................................................39 Table 8 TOD Market Feasibility Results .........................................................................................................................................39 Table 9 Projected Market Demand (Half-Mile) ...............................................................................................................................40 Table 10 Zoning Potential for TOD ................................................................................................................................................41 Table 11 Evaluation Criteria Matrix .................................................................................................................................................45 List of Appendices Appendix A Fact Sheets Appendix B Existing Planning Documents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Short Range Transit Plan (PDF)
    Short Range Transit Plan FY 2020/21 - 2024/25 Golden Empire Transit District Adopted September 2020 Golden Empire Transit District Board of Directors Cindy Parra Jim Baldwin Chair Vice Chair City of Bakersfield County of Kern Carlos Bello Leasa Engel Rueben Pascual Director Director Director City of Bakersfield At-Large County of Kern A five-member Board of Directors governs Golden Empire Transit District. Two members are appointed by the Bakersfield City Council, two members are appointed by the Kern County Board of Supervisors, and one member is appointed at-large by the four other Board members. GET coordinates with City of Bakersfield, the County of Kern, and the Kern Council of Governments. Karen King Chief Executive Officer Short Range Transit Plan FY 20/21 – 24/25 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ......................................................1 CHAPTER 2 SERVICE & PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ......................... 28 CHAPTER 3 SERVICE ANALYSIS .......................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4 PREVIOUS SERVICE REVISIONS ........................................ 77 CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDED SERVICE PLAN ...................................... 81 CHAPTER 6 FINANCIAL PLAN ............................................................ 93 CHAPTER 7 GLOSSARY ...................................................................... 98 REFERENCE MAPS .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient
    CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth plans of action for the region to pursue and meet identified transportation needs and issues. Planned investments are consistent with the goals and policies of the plan, the Sustainable Community Strategy element (see chapter 4) and must be financially constrained. These projects are listed in the Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) and are modeled in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes Forecast modeling methods in this Regional Transportation a more efficient transportation Plan primarily use the “market-based approach” based on demographic data and economic trends (see chapter 3). The system that calls for fully forecast modeling was used to analyze the strategic funding alternative investments in the combined action elements found in this transportation modes, while chapter.. emphasizing transportation demand and transporation Alternative scenarios are not addressed in this document; they are, however, addressed and analyzed for their system management feasibility and impacts in the Environmental Impact Report approaches for new highway prepared for the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, as capacity. required by the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(f) and 15126.6(a)). From this point, the alternatives have been predetermined and projects that would deliver the most benefit were selected. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a more efficient transportation system that calls for fully funding alternative transportation modes, while emphasizing transportation demand and transporation system management approaches for new highway capacity. The Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) includes projects that move the region toward a financially constrained and balanced system.
    [Show full text]
  • Agendas, Meetings and Other Opportunities to Participate, As Appropriate
    KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEETING OF REGIONAL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION MODELING COMMITTEE KERN COG BOARD ROOM WEDNESDAY 1401 19TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR January 2, 2019 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1:30 P.M. Dial +1 (312) 878-3080 https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/586617702 Access Code: 586-617-702 I. ROLL CALL: II. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the Committee on any matter not on this agenda but under the jurisdiction of the Committee. Committee members may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed. They may ask a question for clarification; make a referral to staff for factual information or request staff to report back to the Committee at a later meeting. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PRIOR TO MAKING A PRESENTATION. Disabled individuals who need special assistance to attend or participate in a meeting of the Regional Planning Advisory Committee may request assistance at 1401 19th Street, Suite 300; Bakersfield CA 93301 or by calling (661) 635-2910. Every effort will be made to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities by making meeting material available in alternative formats. Requests for assistance should be made at least three (3) working days in advance whenever possible. III. APPROVAL OF DISCUSSION SUMMARY • RPAC Meeting of August 1, 2018 • RPAC Meeting of October 3, 2018 IV. FEDERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT (PM1) “TOWARD ZERO” 2019 TARGET UPDATE (Flickinger) Comment: Required federal process to annually monitor transportation safety performance measure progress, including encouragement of member agencies to improve safety on our streets with their transportation expenditures.
    [Show full text]
  • For Lease the Shops on Calloway
    FOR LEASE THE SHOPS ON CALLOWAY 2816 CALLOWAY DRIVE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA NORTHWEST BAKERSFIELD ONLY 1,200SF REMAINING PROPERTY FEATURES • Newer construction with co-tenants Whiskey Barrel, Unity Salon, Salon Centric, Circle K and Self Serve Pet SITE Salon • Surrounded by one of the most dynamic tenant mixes in Bakersfield including Kohl’s, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Walmart, Target, Best Buy, Michael’s, World Market, Babies R Us, Ross Dress for Less, Famous Footwear, Home Depot • Located off of Calloway Drive, one of the primary North/South arterials connecting Northwest and Southwest Bakersfield For more information, please contact: JOSH SHERLEY KARI STURGEON PACIFIC COMMERCIAL REALTY ADVISORS Associate Director Sales Associate Lic. #01919464 (661) 633 3840 (661) 633 3820 5060 California Avenue, Suite 1000 [email protected] [email protected] Bakersfield, CA 93309 Lic. #01876855 Lic. #01463739 wwwpaccra.com The depiction in the included photograph of any person, entity, sign, logo or property, other than Cushman & Wakefield’s (C&W) client and the property offered by C&W, is incidental only, and is not intended to connote any affiliation, connection, association, sponsorship or approval by or between that which is incidentally depicted and C&W or its client. This listing shall not be deemed an offer to lease, sublease or sell such property; and, in the event of any transaction for such property, no commission shall be earned by or payable to any cooperating broker except if otherwise provided pursuant to the express terms, rates and conditions of C&W’s agreement with its principal, if, as and when such commission (if any) is actually received from such principal.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal
    Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal October 2017 City of Bakersfield Community CONTACT: Development Department Jacquelyn R. Kitchen 1715 Chester Avenue, Community Development Director 661-326-3754 | [email protected] Bakersfield, CA 93301 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Amazon HQ2 Location Proposal Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Understanding of Amazon Headquarters Project ........................................................... 1 1.2 Why Bakersfield? ......................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2.0 DYNAMIC CITY IN THE IDEAL LOCATION ................................................ 3 2.1 Engaged Elected Officials and City Staff ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Growing Metropolitan Area ........................................................................................... 3 2.3 Personal Travel Times ................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 3.0 COMMUNITY AND FAMILY ........................................................................ 5 3.1 Quality of Life .............................................................................................................. 5 Affordability .................................................................................................................... 5 Comfortable Commute ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation & Parks
    City of Bakersfield Fall 2021 Recreation & Parks Community Events, activites & Parks Information Pickleball Clinics 2021 www.bakersfieldparks.us Content Customer Service Locations Aquatics No transactions will be taken 30 minutes prior to closing Lap Swimming ..............................8 City Hall North Fitness ...........................................8 Administration Offices Community Centers Monday - Friday ● 8:00am - 5:00pm Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. ........6-7 1600 Truxtun Ave. Silver Creek ..................................4 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Facility Rentals (661) 326-FUNN (3866) Community Centers ..................4, 6 Fax: (661) 852-2140 Park Picnic Areas ........................15 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Saunders Recreational Facility .....5 Community Center Sports Fields................................15 Monday - Friday ● 8:00am - 4:50pm General Information 1000 So. Owens St., Bakersfield, CA 93307 (661) 322-9874 ● Fax: (661) 852-2179 Activity Registration Form .........12 Locations Map ............................17 McMurtrey Aquatic Center Park Addresses ............................16 Monday - Friday ● 8:00am - 5:00pm Park Amenities ............................18 1325 Q St. Suite 200, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (661) 852-7430 ● Fax: (661) 852-7434 Park Information & Policies ..13-14 Program Information & Policies 13-14 Silver Creek Community Center Programs & Classes Monday - Friday ● 11:00am - 4:00pm After-School Youth .......................7 7011 Harris Rd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 Fitness ......................................4
    [Show full text]
  • BAKERSFIELD.COM Trump Visits Bakersfi Eld
    THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2020 • BAKERSFIELD.COM Trump visits Bakersfi eld ALEX HORVATH / THE CALIFORNIAN House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy and President Donald Trump react to farmer Larry Starrh’s praise of the president’s efforts on behalf of farmers. The president visited Bakersfield to sign his administration’s reworking of environmental regulations that will direct more of the state’s water to farmers and other agriculture interests in the Central Valley. See more photos from the event at Bakersfield.com. President signs declaration for delivering more Northern Calif. water to Central Valley farmers BY JOHN COX [email protected] ON BAKERSFIELD.COM President Donald Trump, • More photos of Trump’s speaking to a cheering crowd appearance in Bakersfield next to Meadows Field Airport, moved forward Wednesday with • Video of Air Force One touch- a controversial plan intended to ing down give Central Valley farmers more • Vote in a poll on what you’d water from the environmentally like to talk about with Presi- sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin dent Trump River Delta east of San Francisco. Trump signed a presidential memorandum that, along with fi- the action, adding that “California nalization Wednesday of a federal won’t allow the Trump Adminis- “record of decision,” is intended to tration to destroy and deplete our bring new flexibility to the opera- natural resources.” tion of two main conduits bring- Farming groups and Central ing water south from Northern Valley politicians have hailed the California, the Central Valley Proj- Trump administration’s proposal ect and the State Water Project. as a breakthrough that would California Attorney General provide water badly needed by Xavier Becerra immediately re- California’s agricultural industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Lease Opportunity
    GROUND LEASE OPPORTUNITY SEQ ROSEDALE HWY & CALLOWAY DRIVE PREMIER INTERSECTION - NORTHWEST BAKERSFIELD BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Up to 25,100sf* Available for Ground Lease $85,000.00/annual rent *25,100sf to be left after widening of Calloway Drive JOSH SHERLEY KARI STURGEON PACIFIC COMMERCIAL REALTY ADVISORS Director Sales Associate Lic. #01919464 (661) 633 3840 (661) 633 3820 5060 California Avenue, Suite 1000 [email protected] [email protected] Bakersfield, CA 93309 Lic. #01876855 Lic. #01463739 wwwpaccra.com The depiction in the included photograph of any person, entity, sign, logo or property, other than Cushman & Wakefield’s (C&W) client and the property offered by C&W, is incidental only, and is not intended to connote any affiliation, connection, association, sponsorship or approval by or between that which is incidentally depicted and C&W or its client. This listing shall not be deemed an offer to lease, sublease or sell such property; and, in the event of any transaction for such property, no commission shall be earned by or payable to any cooperating broker except if otherwise provided pursuant to the express terms, rates and conditions of C&W’s agreement with its principal, if, as and when such commission (if any) is actually received from such principal. (A copy of the rates and conditions referred to above with respect to this property is available upon request.) GROUND LEASE GROUND LEASE OPPORTUNITY OPPORTUNITY SEQ Rosedale Highway & Calloway Drive PROPERTY FEATURES Ground lease opportunity just south of one
    [Show full text]
  • Kern County Region
    April 25, 2017 Mary Nichols, Chair California Air Resource Board 1001 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: SB 375 Greenhouse Emission Reduction Target for the Kern County Region Dear Chair Nichols, We would like to thank you and your staff for working closely with us on development of the SB375 Target recommendation for Kern. As pointed out in the valley-wide letter to ARB dated December 30, 2016, Kern has achieved and exceeded targets set in 2010 and since the adoption of our first SCS in 2014, we are expanding our efforts to reduce passenger vehicle emissions by better coordinating land use and transportation planning. Based on the modeling results to date, Kern COG’s Regional Planning Advisory Committee and governing Board unanimously recommend the following targets. Table 1 – Kern COG Recommended Targets for the Kern Region Preliminary Per Capita GHG Reduction 2020 2035 Current Targets (2011) -5% -10% Recommended Targets -9%* -13%* *Preliminary recommendation subject to change as improved modeling warrants. The latest modeling for target setting expands on the strategies and assumptions in the 2014 RTP as well as incorporates the improved methods recommended in ARB’s evaluation of the 2014 RTP/SCS. Attachment A provides an overview of the assumptions used in the target modeling. The target setting report in Attachment B spends considerable time discussing the latest technical improvements and challenges for target setting created by the improved methods. It demonstrates Kern’s continued commitment and good faith effort by opening up the modeling black box and helping better inform decision makers and the public on target setting for SB 375.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Environmental Analysis
    METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4.1 LAND USE This Section describes the existing land use designations, plans, and policies within the City of Bakersfield and the Metropolitan Bakersfield area. Additionally, this Section describes the impacts, goals, policies, standards and mitigation measures associated with revisions to land use and the General Plan Update. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS The Metropolitan Bakersfield Planning area encompasses an area of approximately 408 square miles. This is the boundary for which all goals, policies, and programs in the General Plan are applicable. The City’s sphere of influence boundary, defined as a plan for the probable physical boundary and service area of the City, is illustrated in Exhibit 3-3, Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update. Portions of the Planning area fall outside the Sphere of Influence boundary, and are included in the General Plan Update based on the relationship that this area bears on the planning and land use concerns of the City of Bakersfield and the County of Kern. In recognition of this relationship, the General Plan Update will serve to assist LAFCO to . “carry out its purposes and responsibilities for planning and shaping the logical and orderly development and coordination of local government agencies so as to advantageously provide for the present and future needs of the County and its communities . .”. (Government Code 56425(a)) The Planning area can be generally characterized as containing a predominance of rural uses including agriculture/open space, mineral/petroleum, and public recreation uses. These rural uses are generally located at the periphery while existing urban uses are located at it’s core.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern Council of Governments (Kern Cog) 2014 P Reliminary R Egional T Ransportation P Lan (Rtp)
    KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 P RELIMINARY R EGIONAL T RANSPORTATION P LAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 K ERN C OUNCIL OF G OVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 2014 PRELIMINARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) Prepared for: KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (KERN COG) 1401 19TH STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 Prepared by: PMC 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 DECEMBER 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Regional Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Federal Surface Transportation Act (SAFETEA-LU and Its Successor) ................................................... 1-2 Overview of State Requirements ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .......................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Transportation Planning in the Kern Region .............................................................................................. 1-4 CHAPTER 2 Transportation Planning Policies ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Each Child That Receives a Gown Is Dressed in Love'
    SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2019 • BAKERSFIELD.COM Parent’s post on alleged bullying captures notice from community BY EMA SASIC described, there were [email protected] initial instances with chil- When one parent felt dren calling him “gay” and frustrated with administra- “pushing him around,” tors in the Panama-Buena but most concerning was Vista Union School District an alleged instance on the who she felt were not do- playground. ing enough to stop alleged After more instances of instances of bullying in- alleged bullying took place, volving her son, she took to Buchanan decided she had social media. enough. She met with Ger- Kami Buchanan’s post rie Kincaid, assistant super- which describes bullying, intendent of educational name calling, inaction from services, to discuss transfer the district and her son’s options. DARLA A. BAKER / TEHACHAPI NEWS recent hospitalization has “I heard good things David’s Cradle founder Patti Browne works on one of the garments. captured the attention of about (Leo B. Hart Elemen- the community and has tary School), and I heard been shared by more than good things about how the 4,200 people as of Friday. principal dealt with bully- From it all, she is looking ing,” Buchanan said. for a silver lining. Since the transfer, how- ‘Each child that “All I want is for every- ever, Buchanan says “it’s one to be safe and that the been chaos.” school goes through the “It seems like weekly I necessary steps to inform am hearing of something parents (of bullying),” Bu- that’s happened,” she said.
    [Show full text]