DOCSLIB.ORG

Usługi Biznesowe W Warszawie Raport Przygotowany Dla Urzędu M.St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Usługi Biznesowe W Warszawie Raport Przygotowany Dla Urzędu M.St Usługi biznesowe w Warszawie Raport przygotowany dla Urzędu m.st. Warszawy przez Związek Liderów Sektora Usług Biznesowych (ABSL) we współpracy z JLL, Randstad i Randstad Sourceright. Koordynator projektu: Janusz Górecki, Head of Sector Research & Analytics, ABSL [email protected] www.absl.pl W przypadku zainteresowania współpracą z ABSL prosimy o kontakt: Paweł Panczyj, Chief Development Officer, ABSL [email protected] Obsługa Inwestorów w Warszawie: URZĄD M.ST. WARSZAWY Biuro Rozwoju Gospodarczego, ul. Smolna 4, 00-375 Warszawa +48 22 44 32 220 [email protected] www.um.warszawa.pl Projekt graficzny i skład: www.ponad.pl Spis treści 1 Dlaczego Warszawa? 4 2 Centra usług dla biznesu w Warszawie 10 3 Inwestorzy o sobie: historie sukcesu 30 4 Rynek pracy 34 5 Rynek biurowy 48 6 Dostępność czasowa warszawskich centrów usług 56 7 Jakość życia i zaplecze biznesowe 60 8 Wsparcie inwestorów 64 1 Dlaczego Warszawa? Warszawa to główny ośrodek gospodarczy i biznesowy kraju. Stolica Polski jest również jedną z najważniejszych i największych metropolii w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, charakteryzując się bardzo dużym potencjałem inwestycyjnym. Nowoczesną gospodarkę miasta wyróżnia znaczny udział usług opartych na wiedzy, do czego przyczynia się działalność centrów outsourcingu procesów biznesowych (BPO), centrów usług wspólnych (SSC), centrów IT oraz centrów badawczo-rozwojowych (R&D). W niniejszym raporcie zaprezentowano najważniejsze informacje charakteryzujące sektor nowoczesnych usług biznesowych w Warszawie. Omówiono również wybrane aspekty lokalnego rynku pracy, rynku nieruchomości biurowych, dostępności czasowej, jakości życia i zaplecza biznesowego oraz wsparcia dla inwestorów ze strony władz lokalnych. Źródło: Shutterstock Usługi biznesowe w Warszawie 5 Dlaczego Warszawa? RYCINA 1 KLUCZOWE CECHY WARSZAWY JAKO ATRAKCYJNEGO OŚRODKA USŁUG DLA BIZNESU Największy ośrodek gospodarczy, Wysoka jakość szkolnictwa akademicki i kulturalny w Polsce. wyższego. W rankingu QS EECA University Rankings 2018 Uniwersytet Warszawski (największy uniwersytet Jeden z trzech największych w Polsce) zajął 6. miejsce wśród 200 najlepszych uczelni ośrodków usług biznesowych w regionie „Europy Wschodzącej” i Azji Centralnej w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej (Emerging Europe and Central Asia). Uniwersytet Warszawski znajduje się na czele Rankingu – charakteryzujący się dojrzało- Szkół Wyższych Perspektywy 2018 klasyfikującym ścią i trwałym rozwojem sektora. najlepsze szkoły wyższe w Polsce (ex aequo z Uniwersytetem Jagiellońskim w Krakowie). Trzecie miejsce wśród uczelni publicznych zajmu- Największy ośrodek biurowy je Politechnika Warszawska. Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie zajmuje najwyższe w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej. miejsce w grupie uczelni niepublicznych w kraju. Najlepiej skomunikowana metropolia w Polsce. III miejsce w Europie Pozycja Warszawy w rankingu Jeden z trzech ośrodków w Polsce „Europejskie miasta i regiony przy- najlepiej ocenianych pod wzglę- szłości 2018/19” (fDi Intelligence, dem ogólnej satysfakcji centrów Financial Times) w kategorii usług dla biznesu z miejsca europejskich miast przyjaznych dla biznesu (Business Friendliness) prowadzenia działalności – za Londynem i Dublinem. (ranking ABSL). W głównym zestawieniu miast Konkurencyjne koszty operacyjne przyszłości miasto zajęło 11. oraz zatrudnienia w porównaniu pozycję w Europie (II miejsce w „Europie Wschodniej”). Warszawa do największych metropolii zajęła również I miejsce w rankingu w Europie Zachodniej i Północnej. „Polskie miasta przyszłości 2017/18” (fDi Intelligence). Warszawa NOWY JORK londyn tokio 12:14:38 06:14:38 11:14:38 19:14:38 Źródło: opracowanie własne ABSL 6 Usługi biznesowe w Warszawie Dlaczego Warszawa? S7 61 S8 Trójmiasto RYCINA 2 POŁOŻENIE WARSZAWY A1 Białołęka Szczecin Białystok Bydgoszcz Bielany Targówek Żoliborz Berlin Praga Pn. Rembertów Bemowo A2 Poznań A2 Praga Pd. Wesoła Wola Śródmieście Warszawa Łódź 92 Ochota A2 Ursus Wawer Mokotów A4 Lublin A1 Drezno Wrocław S2 Włochy A2 Wilanów Katowice 17 Kraków Ursynów Praga A4 Rzeszów Ostrawa Lwów Brno S8 S7 79 Źródło: opracowanie własne ABSL Koszyce TABELA 1 Wiedeń Bratysława ODLEGŁOŚĆ I SZACOWANY CZAS PODRÓŻY DO WYBRANYCH MIAST Warszawa jest liderem w finansowaniu transportu Czas podróży Odległość publicznego w Polsce. (km) Samochód Pociąg Samolot Miasto wydaje na ten cel największą część budżetu Berlin 520 5h 30min 6h 20min 1h 30min w porównaniu z innymi * Frankfurt nad Menem 890 10h 00min 10h 45min 1h 45min dużymi polskimi miastami. Amsterdam 1 100 11h 30min 13h 00min* 2h 00min W przeliczeniu na mieszkań- ca przeznacza na transport Moskwa 1 150 14h 30min 19h 00min 2h 00min publiczny o 80% więcej niż ** Paryż 1 370 15h 00min 14h 45min 2h 30min drugie miasto w rankingu. Londyn 1 450 17h 00min 21h 00min*** 2h 30min * Każda gwiazdka oznacza konieczność jednej przesiadki Źródła: Deutsche Bahn, Goeuro, Google Flights, Google Maps, PKP PLK Źródło: www.transport-publiczny.pl Usługi biznesowe w Warszawie 7 Dlaczego Warszawa? S7 61 S8 RYCINA 3 DOSTĘPNOŚĆ ZEWNĘTRZNA MIASTA Białołęka Bielany Targówek Żoliborz Praga Pn. Rembertów Bemowo Praga Pd. Wesoła Wola Śródmieście 92 Ochota A2 Ursus Wawer Mokotów S2 Włochy A2 Wilanów 17 Ursynów S8 S7 79 Dostępność zewnętrzna miasta północnymi i południowymi granicami Polski. Warszawa położona jest w centrum Polski na W Warszawie znajduje się Lotnisko Chopina skrzyżowaniu najważniejszych europejskich szlaków (WAW) zapewniające dostęp do najważniejszych drogowych (E 30, E 67 – Via Baltica, E 77, E 372) światowych centrów przesiadkowych (m. in. Londyn i kolejowych (E 20, E 65, E 75 – Rail Baltica). Dobrą Heathrow, Frankfurt nad Menem, Chicago-O’Hare, dostępność w transporcie drogowym zapewniają Paryż Charles de Gaulle, Pekin, Madryt, Amsterdam, autostrada A2 oraz drogi ekspresowe S7, S8 i S17. Dubaj, Hamad) oraz 51 państw świata. Jest to Warszawa jest również dużym węzłem kolejowym, największy port lotniczy w Polsce. W odległości skąd prowadzą bezpośrednie linie kolejowe: nr 1 33 km od centrum Warszawy znajduje się kolejny (do Katowic), nr 2 (do granicy z Białorusią), nr 3 port lotniczy – Warszawa-Modlin (WMI), skąd (do granicy z Niemcami), nr 6 (do granicy z Białorusią), realizowane są połączenia do 10 europejskich stolic. nr 7 (do granicy z Ukrainą), nr 8 (do Krakowa), nr 9 Obecnie prowadzone są liczne inwestycje, dzięki (do Gdańska). Krzyżują się tu linie kolejowe biegnące którym systematycznie zwiększa się dostępność pomiędzy zachodnimi i wschodnimi oraz transportowa miasta. 8 Usługi biznesowe w Warszawie Dlaczego Warszawa? Reykjavík Lotnisko Chopina Warszawa-Modlin (WAW) (Wmi) Bergen Odległość i czas dojazdu z centrum miasta Helsinki 7 km / 20 min 33 km / 45 min Oslo Petersburg Tallinn Sztokholm Liczba obsługiwanych krajów Moskwa Glasgow Belfast Edynburg Göteborg 51 13 Tokio Ryga Newcastle Billund Seul Liczba kierunków lotów Dublin Malmö Liverpool Leeds Pekin Shannon Kopenhaga Połąga Wilno Toronto Manchester Doncaster-Sheffi eld Singapur Kaliningrad 121 48 Kowno Mińsk Los Angeles East Midlands Gdańsk Astana Birmingham Hamburg Chicago Szczecin Dubaj Całkowity ruch pasażerski Bristol Hannower Londyn Amsterdam Nowy Jork Berlin Doha Eindhoven Poznań Modlin 15,75 mln (2017) 2,9 mln (2017) Newark Kolonia / Bonn Tel Aviv Zielona Góra Warszawa Gran Canaria Bruksela Düsseldorf Szarm el-Szejk Wrocław Lublin * * Kijów Frankfurt nad Menem Charków 18 mln (2018 ) 3,1 mln (2018 ) Teneryfa Katowice Hurghada Luksemburg Praga Rzeszów * prognoza * prognoza Agadir Norymberga Kraków Marsa Alam Paryż Stuttgart Lwów Liczba linii lotniczych Kutaisi Koszyce Monachium Zaporoże Bratysława Tbilisi Bazylea Wiedeń Kiszyniów 31 1 Erywań Budapeszt Genewa Zurych Odessa Bordeaux Przykładowe linie lotnicze obsługujące połączenia regularne Lyon Kluż-Napoka Santander Lublana Mediolan Wenecja Zagrzeb PLL LOT, Wizz Air, Ryanair, Bergamo Pula Belgrad Porto Bukareszt Lufthansa, Emirates, Air France, Ryanair Tuluza Bolonia Nicea British Airways, KLM Rimini Zadar Piza Split TABELA 2 Madryt S o fi a Barcelona Burgas LICZBA BEZPOŚREDNICH LOTÓW TYGODNIOWO Lizbona Rzym Dubrownik DO WYBRANYCH MIAST I CZAS PRZELOTU Podgorica Skopje Stambuł Walencja Bari Faro Alghero Frankfurt nad Menem 50 1h45min-1h55min Bruksela Charleroi 10 2h05min Palma Neapol Saloniki Sevilla Amsterdam 43 2h05min-2h15min Paryż Beauvais 4 2h20min Alicante Cagliari Paryż Charles de Gaulle 47 2h25min-2h35min Londyn Stansted 23 2h30min Malaga Korfu Londyn Heathrow 40 2h40min-2h50min Madryt Barajas 4 3h35min Lamezia Terme Londyn City* 12 2h45min Ateny * Od 7 stycznia 2019 r. Katania Źródło: www.lotnisko-chopina.pl, www.modlinairport.pl, Google Flights Warszawa-Modlin (WMI) Lotnisko Chopina (WAW) Malta Larnaka Usługi biznesowe w Warszawie 9 Dlaczego Warszawa? Reykjavík RYCINA 4 KOMUNIKACJA LOTNICZA Bergen Helsinki Oslo Petersburg Tallinn Sztokholm Moskwa Glasgow Belfast Edynburg Göteborg Tokio Ryga Newcastle Billund Seul Dublin Malmö Liverpool Leeds Pekin Shannon Kopenhaga Połąga Wilno Toronto Manchester Doncaster-Sheffi eld Singapur Kaliningrad Kowno Mińsk Los Angeles East Midlands Gdańsk Astana Birmingham Hamburg Chicago Szczecin Dubaj Bristol Hannower Londyn Amsterdam Nowy Jork Berlin Doha Eindhoven Poznań Modlin Newark Kolonia / Bonn Tel Aviv Zielona Góra Warszawa Gran Canaria Bruksela Düsseldorf Szarm el-Szejk Wrocław Lublin Kijów Frankfurt nad Menem Charków Teneryfa Katowice Hurghada Luksemburg Praga Agadir Norymberga Kraków Rzeszów Marsa Alam Paryż Stuttgart Lwów Kutaisi Koszyce Monachium Zaporoże Bratysława Tbilisi Bazylea Wiedeń Kiszyniów
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report
    Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report 30 April 2017 x Date Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Version ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Terms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 EY work context ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Context of the CBA ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Key constraints and considerations of the analysis ................................................................ 6 3. Background and information about the project ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Project background and timeline ......................................................................................... 8 3.2 Brief description of the project ........................................................................................... 9 4. Methodology ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Model of the Passenger Flow on Rail Baltica
    Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference M. Rabe, A.A. Juan, N. Mustafee, A. Skoogh, S. Jain, and B. Johansson, eds. DYNAMIC MODEL OF THE PASSENGER FLOW ON RAIL BALTICA Juri Tolujew Tobias Reggelin Irina Yatskiv Ilya Jackson Department of Mathematical Methods and Department of Logistics and Material Handling Modelling Systems Transport and Telecommunication Institute Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Lomonosova Str. 1 Universitätsplatz 2 LV-1019 Riga, LATVIA 39106 Magdeburg, GERMANY ABSTRACT This paper describes the design and application of a model simulating the passenger flows on the high- speed rail line Rail Baltica. The proposed model allows one to define passenger flow service indicators, according to data on the behavior of potential passengers that take the train in different localities along Rail Baltica. If corresponding baseline data is provided and the duration of the longest trip will not exceed one day, the model can be used to study processes on other railways with a similar structure. The developed model simulates movements and accumulation of passengers at stations and in trains on four sections connecting five cities along Rail Baltica. Besides that, the model allows for studying particular scenarios related to large sports or other events that will take place near one or several cities through which the railway passes. 1 INTRODUCTION Rail Baltica is a project to construct a high-speed railway that will link up the Baltic states Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia with Central European countries. As the result of the “Rail Baltica I” stage, a standard-gauge railway with a track gauge of 1,435 mm will be built.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEEDLINES, HSIPR Committee, Issue
    High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail SPEEDLINES JULY 2017 ISSUE #21 2 CONTENTS SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 HSIPR COMMITTEE CHAIR LETTER 5 APTA’S HS&IPR ROI STUDY Planes, trains, and automobiles may have carried us through the 7 VIRGINIA VIEW 20th century, but these days, the future buzz is magnetic levitation, autonomous vehicles, skytran, jet- 10 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES packs, and zip lines that fit in a backpack. 15 MAGLEV » p.15 18 HYPERLOOP On the front cover: Futuristic visions of transport systems are unlikely to 20 SPOTLIGHT solve our current challenges, it’s always good to dream. Technology promises cleaner transportation systems for busy metropolitan cities where residents don’t have 21 CASCADE CORRIDOR much time to spend in traffic jams. 23 USDOT FUNDING TO CALTRAINS CHAIR: ANNA BARRY VICE CHAIR: AL ENGEL SECRETARY: JENNIFER BERGENER OFFICER AT LARGE: DAVID CAMERON 25 APTA’S 2017 HSIPR CONFERENCE IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR: PETER GERTLER EDITOR: WENDY WENNER PUBLISHER: AL ENGEL 29 LEGISLATIVE OUTLOOK ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: KENNETH SISLAK ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: ERIC PETERSON LAYOUT DESIGNER: WENDY WENNER 31 NY PENN STATION RENEWAL © 2011-2017 APTA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPEEDLINES is published in cooperation with: 32 GATEWAY PROGRAM AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION 1300 I Street NW, Suite 1200 East Washington, DC 20005 35 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS “The purpose of SPEEDLINES is to keep our members and friends apprised of the high performance passenger rail envi- ronment by covering project and technology developments domestically and globally, along with policy/financing break- throughs. Opinions expressed represent the views of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of APTA nor its High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Committee.” 4 Dear HS&IPR Committee & Friends : I am pleased to continue to the newest issue of our Committee publication, the acclaimed SPEEDLINES.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #30, March 2021
    High-Speed Intercity Passenger SPEEDLINESMarch 2021 ISSUE #30 Moynihan is a spectacular APTA’S CONFERENCE SCHEDULE » p. 8 train hall for Amtrak, providing additional access to Long Island Railroad platforms. Occupying the GLOBAL RAIL PROJECTS » p. 12 entirety of the superblock between Eighth and Ninth Avenues and 31st » p. 26 and 33rd Streets. FRICTIONLESS, HIGH-SPEED TRANSPORTATION » p. 5 APTA’S PHASE 2 ROI STUDY » p. 39 CONTENTS 2 SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER On the front cover: Greetings from our Chair, Joe Giulietti INVESTING IN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS WILL CREATE HIGHLY SKILLED JOBS IN THE TRANS- PORTATION INDUSTRY, REVITALIZE DOMESTIC 4 APTA’S CONFERENCE INDUSTRIES SUPPLYING TRANSPORTATION PROD- UCTS AND SERVICES, REDUCE THE NATION’S DEPEN- DENCY ON FOREIGN OIL, MITIGATE CONGESTION, FEATURE ARTICLE: AND PROVIDE TRAVEL CHOICES. 5 MOYNIHAN TRAIN HALL 8 2021 CONFERENCE SCHEDULE 9 SHARED USE - IS IT THE ANSWER? 12 GLOBAL RAIL PROJECTS 24 SNIPPETS - IN THE NEWS... ABOVE: For decades, Penn Station has been the visible symbol of official disdain for public transit and 26 FRICTIONLESS HIGH-SPEED TRANS intercity rail travel, and the people who depend on them. The blight that is Penn Station, the new Moynihan Train Hall helps knit together Midtown South with the 31 THAILAND’S FIRST PHASE OF HSR business district expanding out from Hudson Yards. 32 AMTRAK’S BIKE PROGRAM CHAIR: JOE GIULIETTI VICE CHAIR: CHRIS BRADY SECRETARY: MELANIE K. JOHNSON OFFICER AT LARGE: MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN 33
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Baltica Final Report Executive Summary
    Transportation May 2011 Rail Baltica Final Report Executive Summary Prepared by: ............................................................. Checked by: ........................................................................ P Constable A Kakulis Deputy Project Manager Local Project Coordinator Approved by: ............................................................. M Elton Project Manager Rail Baltica Final Report Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Final Report v2 AK PC 31/05/11 Saxon House, 27 Duke Street, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 1HT Telephone: 01245 771200 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No Reference Date Created May 2011 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. c:\backup\my documents\documents\aecom\aecom lv\projects\rail baltica\project administration\final report\submittal v2\executive summary\rail_baltica_final_report_executive_summary_31_05_11 final v2.doc Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Transportation Challenge MOVING the U.S
    The Transportation Challenge MOVING THE U.S. ECONOMY Prepared for National Chamber Foundation Prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Boston Logistics Group, Inc. Alan E. Pisarski Acknowledgment and Use This work was prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. under contract to the National Chamber Foun- dation® of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. This material is privileged and confidential and may not be used without the permission of the National Chamber Foundation. Disclaimer The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research agency. They are nor necessarily those of the National Chamber Foundation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. © Copyright 2008 T H E TransportationCHALLENGE MOVING THE U.S. ECONOMY SECTION TITLE PAGE NUMBER 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................ 4 Background ................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose and Structure of Report ........................................................................................................... 6 The Linkages Between Transportation Investment and Economic Growth .................................................... 7 2.0 The Economy and Transportation ......................................... 12 Changing U.S. Economy ........................................................................................................................ 12 Changing U.S. Freight and Logistics Systems .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Europe's Railways
    Innentitel 001_002_Innentitel_Impressum.indd 1 16.12.10 16:04 Reforming Europe's Railways – Learning from Experience Published by the Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies – CER Avenue des Arts 53 B -1000 Bruxelles www.cer.be second edition 2011 produced by Jeremy Drew and Johannes Ludewig Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek: The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografi e, detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://d-nb.de Publishing House: DVV Media Group GmbH | Eurailpress Postbox 10 16 09 · D-20010 Hamburg Nordkanalstraße 36 · D-20097 Hamburg Telephone: +49 (0) 40 – 237 14 02 Telefax: +49 (0) 40 – 237 14 236 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.dvvmedia.com, www.eurailpress.de, www.railwaygazette.com Publishing Director: Detlev K. Suchanek Editorial Office: Dr. Bettina Guiot Distribution and Marketing: Riccardo di Stefano Cover Design: Karl-Heinz Westerholt Print: TZ-Verlag & Print GmbH, Roßdorf Copyright: © 2011 by DVV Media Group GmbH | Eurailpress, Hamburg This publication is protected by copyright. It may not be exploited, in whole or in part, without the approval of the publisher. This applies in particular to any form of reproduction, translation, microfilming and incorporation and processing in electric systems. ISBN 978-3-7771-0415-7 A DVV Media Group publication DVV Media Group 001_002_Innentitel_Impressum.indd 2 16.12.10 16:04 Contents Foreword....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor Study
    North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor Study Final Report December 2014 TransportTransportll North Sea – Baltic Final Report Mandatory disclaimer The information and views set out in this Final Report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission's behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. December 2014 !! The!Study!of!the!North!Sea!/!Baltic!Core!Network!Corridor,!Final!Report! ! ! December!2014! Final&Report& ! of!the!PROXIMARE!Consortium!to!the!European!Commission!on!the! ! The$Study$of$the$North$Sea$–$Baltic$ Core$Network$Corridor$ ! Prepared!and!written!by!Proximare:! •!Triniti!! •!Malla!Paajanen!Consulting!! •!Norton!Rose!Fulbright!LLP! •!Goudappel!Coffeng! •!IPG!Infrastruktur/!und!Projektentwicklungsgesellschaft!mbH! With!input!by!the!following!subcontractors:! •!University!of!Turku,!Brahea!Centre! •!Tallinn!University,!Estonian!Institute!for!Future!Studies! •!STS/Consulting! •!Nacionalinių!projektų!rengimas!(NPR)! •ILiM! •!MINT! Proximare!wishes!to!thank!the!representatives!of!the!European!Commission!and!the!Member! States!for!their!positive!approach!and!cooperation!in!the!preparation!of!this!Progress!Report! as!well!as!the!Consortium’s!Associate!Partners,!subcontractors!and!other!organizations!that! have!been!contacted!in!the!course!of!the!Study.! The!information!and!views!set!out!in!this!Final!Report!are!those!of!the!authors!and!do!not!
    [Show full text]
  • Business Services in Warsaw
    Business Services in Warsaw Report prepared for the City of Warsaw by the Association of Business Service Leaders (ABSL) in cooperation with JLL, Randstad and Randstad Sourceright Project coordinator: Janusz Górecki, Head of Sector Research & Analytics, ABSL [email protected] www.absl.pl Interested in cooperation with ABSL? Please contact: Paweł Panczyj, Chief Development Officer, ABSL [email protected] Investor support in Warsaw: THE CITY OF WARSAW Economic Development Department ul. Smolna 4, 00-375 Warsaw +48 22 44 32 220 / +48 22 44 32 244 [email protected] www.um.warszawa.pl Layout and printing: www.ponad.pl Table of Contents 1 Why Warsaw? 4 2 Business services centers in Warsaw 10 3 Investors about themselves: success stories 30 4 The labor market 34 5 Warsaw office market 48 6 Time accessibility of Warsaw centers 56 7 Quality of life and business support 60 8 Investor support 64 1 WHY Warsaw? Warsaw is Poland’s main economic and business hub. The capital is also one of the most important and largest metropolises in Central and Eastern Europe, with tremendous investment potential. The city’s modern economy features a significant knowledge-based services sector including business process outsourcing centers (BPO), shared services centers (SSC), IT centers, and research and development centers (R&D). This report presents the most important information on the business services sector in Warsaw. It also discusses selected aspects of the local labor market, the office real estate market, time accessibility, quality of life and support available to investors from local authorities. Source: Shutterstock Business Services in Warsaw 5 Why Warsaw? FIGURE 1 KEY FEATURES OF WARSAW AS AN ATTRACTIVE BUSINESS SERVICES LOCATION The most important economic, High quality of higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Lrt's Key Role In
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com OCTOBER 2019 NO. 982 LRT’S KEY ROLE IN A ‘bALTIC BIG BANG’ Creating a sustainable gateway to Estonia’s booming capital Hopes revived for Leeds tram network Ottawa opens Confederation LRT line Shanghai doubles Songjiang tramway South Wales Tampere £4.60 The urban rail Re-imagining a revolution begins... post-industrial city 2019 2 October 2019 – London Recognising excellence and innovation in the global light and urban rail sector. Book your place now! SUPPORTED BY ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 369 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association OCTOBER 2019 Vol. 82 No. 982 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin 375 [email protected] NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, Philip Webb, Rick Wilson ampere/Wille Nyyssönen ampere/Wille T PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth 385 of ity Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 C [email protected] NEWS 364 neXT-generation: luXembourg 382 DESIGN – Debbie Nolan Ottawa finally opens Confederation LRT line; With the initial tram service established, ADVertiSING Jerusalem win grows CAF by 25%; Shanghai Luxembourg City looks to expansion. COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler opens latest Songjiang extension; Phoenix Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 [email protected] votes for LRT; Bombardier wins in Dresden.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decision Support System for Investments in Public Transport Infrastructure
    Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto A Decision Support System for Investments in Public Transport Infrastructure Marcos Paulo Schlickmann Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in Transportation Systems Supervisors: Doctor Luís Miguel Garrido Martínez Prof Doctor Jorge Manuel Pinho de Sousa May 2018 © Marcos Paulo Schlickmann, 2018 ii This thesis is dedicated to Sofia, Gabriel and Rodrigo. iii ABSTRACT When public authorities face the need to improve a transportation system, they normally have to make a difficult choice among a set of technological and operational alternatives. To help the correct evaluation of each alternative and its impacts, costs and benefits, it would be useful to have a decision support system (DSS) based on approaches such as Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and/or Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). Among the many impacts caused by a public transportation system, typically those on the land use are not adequately considered in the decision-making processes, mainly because they are hard to monetize, they are often considered as value transfer instead of value creation, and they are too complex to be assessed by traditional transport modeling tools. To overcome these weaknesses, the objectives of this research are to identify and measure the impacts of transit systems on land use and accessibility, and to consider those impacts in decision-making processes, along with more traditional financial and transport related impacts. For this purpose, a DSS, combining a land use and transport model with a MCDA model, was developed. This system was assessed in a small case study, where Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) projects are presented, and in a real case study, the Green Line extension project in Boston, the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • « Rail Baltica »
    ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT July 2005 – July 2006 European Coordinator Pavel Telička PRIORITY PROJECT No 27 « Rail Baltica » Warsaw-Kaunas-Riga-Tallinn-Helsinki Brussels, July 2006 This report only represents the opinion of the european coordinator and does not prejudge the official position of the Commission INDEX INTRODUCTION ………….………………………………………………………. 4 1.1 Origins of the project………………………………………………….. 4 1.2 Enlargement and the High Level Group…………………………….. 4 1.3 The Regional Development Aspect…………………………………... 5 1.4 Financing the Project ………………………………………………… 5 1.5 Planning the Project………………………………………………….. 5 2. MISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COORDINATOR …………………………. 6 2.1 The Mission……………………………………………………………...6 2.2 Visits to the Partner Countries……………………………………… 6 2.3 Political Support………………………………………………………. 6 3. POSITIONS OF THE PARTNER COUNTRIES………………………………7 4. KEY ISSUES IDENTIFIED…………………………………………………….. 8 4.1 The Route……………………………………………………………….8 4.2 Border Crossings……………………………………………………….9 4.3 The Gauge………………………………………………………………9 4.4 The Railway Operators……………………………………………….10 4.5 The Environment……………………………………………………...10 4.6 Financing………………………………………………………………10 3. THE FEASIBILITY STUDY…………………....................................................10 4. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH THE FEASIBILITY STUDY……….11 5. SPECIFIC PROBLEMS WITH THE PRIORITY PROJECT………………..12 7. THE FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVES 2007-2013…………………………….....12 8. CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………….13 ANNEXES……………………………………………………………………… ….13 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Origins of the Project “Rail Baltica” is an imaginative, strategic and sustainable rail transport project involving four new Member States of the EU - Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, as well as Finland. The project aims to link the Baltic States with Poland and the rest of the EU. The project has its origins in ideas expressed during the three first Pan European Transport Conferences starting with Prague in 1991 and continuing with Crete in 1994 and Helsinki in June 1997.
    [Show full text]