DOCSLIB.ORG

Restoration of an Urban Salt Marsh: an Interdisciplinary Approach David G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series 1997 Restoration of an Urban Salt Marsh: An Interdisciplinary Approach David G. Casagrande Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Casagrande, David G., "Restoration of an Urban Salt Marsh: An Interdisciplinary Approach" (1997). Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 100. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin/100 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin Series Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Restoration of an Urban Salt Marsh: An Interdisciplinary Approach JOSEPH A. MILLER AND JANE COPPOCK, BULLETIN SERIES EDITORS DAVID G. CASAGRANDE, VOLUME EDITOR Yale University New Haven, C o n ne c t i c u t • 1997 The Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series, begun in 1912, issues faculty and student monographs, symposia and workshop proceedings, and other reports on an occasional basis. To order copies of this or other Yale F&ES Bulletins, contact: F&ES Bulletin Series Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies 205 Prospect Street New Haven CT 06511 USA http://www.yale.edu/forestry/publications e-mail: [email protected] Volume Editor David G. Casagrande Bulletin Series Editors Joseph A. Miller and Jane Coppock Illustrations Doreen Gayer and Donna Gayer Design R. Richard Solaski Cover West Rock (1849), by Frederic Edwin Church, From the Collection of the New Britain Museum of American Art, Connecticut, John B. Talcott Fund, Photograph by E. Irving Blomstrann Production Yale University RIS Publishing Paper Mohawk Superfine Soft White satin, lb. text, recycled, acid free Partially funded by the Long Island Sound License Plate Program. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Additional Funding Connecticut Sea Grant College Program Norcross Wildlife Foundation Bulletin Number ISSN - CODEN BYSSDM © Yale University Permission is granted to reproduce this volume without prior written consent. Abstracts of this Bulletin and additional data are available on the Center for Coastal and Watershed Systems’ web page at http:// www.yale.edu/forestry/CCWS. Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 4 PREFACE 5 INTRODUCTION 7 SECTION I: SOCIAL CONTEXT 12 The Full Circle: A Historical Context for Urban Salt Marsh Restoration 13 David Casagrande Contingent Valuation of an Urban Salt Marsh Restoration 41 Matthew Udziela and Lynne Bennett Values, Perceptions, and Restoration Goals 62 David Casagrande Predicting the Social Impacts of Restoration in an Urban Park 76 Christina Page SECTION II: ECOLOGICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL CONTEXT 102 The Hydrologic Structure and Function of the West River Marsh 103 Paul Barten and William Kenny Soils, Sediments, and Contamination 123 Richard Orson, William Price, and Sasha Weinstein Ecological Context and Vegetation Restoration 136 Richard Orson, Lauren Brown, and Penelope Sharp SECTION III: BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS 151 Benthic Invertebrates of the Lower West River 152 Carmela Cuomo and Gabriele Zinn Aquatic Insects of the West River and Salt Marshes of Connecticut 162 Raymond Pupedis Fish Communities as Indicators of Environmental Quality in the West River Watershed 178 Jon Moore, Arthur Lew, John Cunningham, and Michael Kachuba Amphibians and Reptiles of the Lower West River 197 William West and David Skelly Using Avian Communities to Evaluate Salt Marsh Restoration 204 Celia Lewis and David Casagrande Mammals of West River Memorial Park 237 Harvey Smith SECTION IV: SYNTHESIS 253 The Human Component of Urban Wetland Restoration 254 David Casagrande Acknowledgments An interdisciplinary, multi-institutional effort such as this owes thanks to a great number of people and organizations. Emly McDiarmid, Program Director, and Gaboury Benoit, Faculty Director, of the Center for Coastal and Watershed Systems at Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies (F&ES), and Jared Cohon, Dean of Yale F&ES, provided the institutional framework necessary for this project. For providing financial support, we are grateful to the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) Long Island Sound License Plate Program, the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program, the Norcross Wildlife Foundation, and Yale F&ES. For their institutional assistance, we are also grateful to the Cities of New Haven and West Haven and their mayors, John DeStefano and Richard Borer, the Connecticut Botanical Society, the Connecticut DEP, the Connecticut Entomological Society, the Connecticut Tennis Foundation, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U. S. National Park Service’s Olmsted Archives, the New Haven Land Trust, the Town of Fairfield, Connecticut, and the U. S. Forest Service. To those who assisted us in the field, generously shared their ideas, knowledge and advice, reviewed manuscripts, and supported our work in many other ways we thank: Diana Balmori, Michael Barker, Jennifer Beck, William Burch, Paul Capotosto, Guido, Dorothy, and Thomas Casagrande, Tim Clark, Heather Crawford, Christina Cromley, John Cunningham, Peter Davis, Jenny Dickson, Gordon Evans, Carolyn Falls, Lynne Favour, Joy Ford, Donna Gayer, Bob Gilmore, Karyn Gilvarg, Robert Gregan, Donna Hall, James Hill, William Jordan III, Carol Kasper, Pam Kressman, Carol Kinzler, Aimlee Laderman, Vin LaVorgna, Eric Lazo-Wasem, Michael Ludwig, William Martin, Nicole Morganthaler, Leonard Munstermann, Lara Nachiem, Alvin Novick, Kate O’Brien, Diane Palmeri, Christopher Percy, Jerry Poole, Noble Proctor, David Reher, Charles Remington, Arthur Rocque, Jr., Ron Rozsa, Pat Rubano, Oswald Schmitz, Tom Steinke, Mitchell Truwit, Frank Williams, and Roman Zajac. Joe Miller and Jane Coppock provided invaluable editorial support. Doreen and Donna Gayer illustrated this Bulletin. Russell Shaddox provided graphic and production assistance. David G. Casagrande Volume Editor Preface This is an exceptionally informative, innovative, and relevant Bulletin in a number of important respects, all captured by its care­ fully chosen title. Of critical and timely significance is its interdisci­ plinary approach. The restoration of damaged and disturbed environments represents more than a technical challenge. We cannot, of course, accomplish ecological restoration lacking basic biophysical knowledge and management tools. Yet, these technical and scientific issues represent only the beginning of the restoration task, typically omitting the necessity of precisely identifying what we are trying to accomplish, articulating a compelling vision of this goal, and develop­ ing a comprehensive methodology for achieving this end. In my opinion, one of the tragic These latter considerations inevitably require the additional assumptions of contemporary life is the knowledge and practice of a wide range of disciplines, including wide-spread belief that city people no economics, sociology, political science, and others. We must confront, longer require an abundant, diverse, and healthy natural environment to lead for example, the basic question of just what we are hoping to restore. lives rich in satisfaction and meaning. This latter consideration ultimately constitutes a question of values, a determination of what attributes of worth and benefit from nature we are striving to restore and render available to people and society. This issue becomes especially prominent when trying to restore damaged environments where large numbers of people live, most particularly in the modern city. Whenever large numbers of people are involved, we must address in specific, persuasive, and precise ways that goods and services are provided by restored environments, as well as the costs and sacrifices people may be required to make to achieve this end. We must also recognize that restoration cannot be accomplished lacking the understanding, appreciation, and support of local communities. At the least, this necessitates a deep and sym­ pathetic knowledge of the characteristics, interests, attitudes, and needs of varying human populations. An additionally important facet of this Bulletin is its focus on the modern city. In my opinion, one of the tragic assumptions of contemporary life is the widespread belief that city people no longer require an abundant, diverse, and healthy natural environ­ ment to lead lives rich in satisfaction and meaning. Most urban dwellers are repeatedly reminded of the presumed unimportance of nature in the urban context. Environmental considerations are routinely omitted from matters of urban building design, siting decisions, road building, industrial development, shopping center construction, and various other land and water planning and management choices. The average developer and politician typically views with indifference remaining pockets of open space, and often regards environmental expenditures as the lowest of budgetary priorities. Likewise, few city officials recognize
Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest

    Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest

    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1104–1123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-boreal forest Kamal J.K. Gandhi a,b,1, Daniel W. Gilmore b,2, Steven A. Katovich c, William J. Mattson d, John C. Zasada e,3, Steven J. Seybold a,b,* a Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA b Department of Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 5985 Hwy K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA e USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1831 Hwy 169E, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We studied the short-term effects of a catastrophic windstorm and subsequent salvage-logging and Received 9 September 2007 prescribed-burning fuel-reduction treatments on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a Received in revised form 8 June 2008 sub-borealforestinnortheasternMinnesota,USA. During2000–2003, 29,873groundbeetlesrepresentedby Accepted 9 June 2008 71 species were caught in unbaited and baited pitfall traps in aspen/birch/conifer (ABC) and jack pine (JP) cover types. At the family level, both land-area treatment and cover type had significant effects on ground Keywords: beetle trap catches, but there were no effects of pinenes and ethanol as baits.
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial

    (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial

    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
  • PELLIZZARI-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf (3.679Mb)

    PELLIZZARI-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf (3.679Mb)

    A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Pellizzari, Peter. 2020. A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365752 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 A dissertation presented by Peter Pellizzari to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2020 © 2020 Peter Pellizzari All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisors: Jane Kamensky and Jill Lepore Peter Pellizzari A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 Abstract The American Revolution not only marked the end of Britain’s control over thirteen rebellious colonies, but also the beginning of a division among subsequent historians that has long shaped our understanding of British America. Some historians have emphasized a continental approach and believe research should look west, toward the people that inhabited places outside the traditional “thirteen colonies” that would become the United States, such as the Gulf Coast or the Great Lakes region.
  • The Governors of Connecticut, 1905

    The Governors of Connecticut, 1905

    ThegovernorsofConnecticut Norton CalvinFrederick I'his e dition is limited to one thousand copies of which this is No tbe A uthor Affectionately Dedicates Cbis Book Co George merriman of Bristol, Connecticut "tbe Cruest, noblest ana Best friend T €oer fia<T Copyrighted, 1 905, by Frederick Calvin Norton Printed by Dorman Lithographing Company at New Haven Governors Connecticut Biographies o f the Chief Executives of the Commonwealth that gave to the World the First Written Constitution known to History By F REDERICK CALVIN NORTON Illustrated w ith reproductions from oil paintings at the State Capitol and facsimile sig natures from official documents MDCCCCV Patron's E dition published by THE CONNECTICUT MAGAZINE Company at Hartford, Connecticut. ByV I a y of Introduction WHILE I w as living in the home of that sturdy Puritan governor, William Leete, — my native town of Guil ford, — the idea suggested itself to me that inasmuch as a collection of the biographies of the chief executives of Connecticut had never been made, the work would afford an interesting and agreeable undertaking. This was in the year 1895. 1 began the task, but before it had far progressed it offered what seemed to me insurmountable obstacles, so that for a time the collection of data concerning the early rulers of the state was entirely abandoned. A few years later the work was again resumed and carried to completion. The manuscript was requested by a magazine editor for publication and appeared serially in " The Connecticut Magazine." To R ev. Samuel Hart, D.D., president of the Connecticut Historical Society, I express my gratitude for his assistance in deciding some matters which were subject to controversy.
  • Godly Government Puritans and the Founding of Newark Timothy J

    Godly Government Puritans and the Founding of Newark Timothy J

    Godly Government Puritans and the Founding of Newark Timothy J. Crist President, Newark History Society November 9, 2009 Godly Government Puritans and the Founding of Newark This is the 30th program that the Newark History Society has sponsored. Most of our programs have covered 20th century topics, although a few have dipped into the 19th century, including our program on Thomas Edison, which took us back to the 1870s. But tonight I want to go back 350 years, to 1659, to a time when England was in crisis. The resolution of that crisis led directly to the founding of Newark by a group of Puritans from New Haven Colony. The crisis was caused by the power vacuum in england following oliver Cromwell’s death in 1658. Cromwell had been the lord Protector of england following the english civil war and the execution of King Charles I. His son, richard Cromwell, succeeded him but quickly proved incapable, and he resigned early in 1659. england was left without an effective government. Army generals and their troops, as well as a rump Parliament, moved into the power vacuum. eventually, General George monck marched with his troops to london and engineered the restoration of the monarchy. So, after eleven years in exile, Charles II returned to england in may 1660 and finally succeeded his father as King. The people of new Haven Colony closely followed the crisis in england. With their strong Puritan views, they recognized immediately that the restoration of Charles II would turn their world upside down. They had formed new Haven Colony in 1639 to demonstrate how Biblical rules should guide the organization of both church and state, and they had expected to be the proverbial “city on the hill” showing God’s Way to england.
  • Early Puritanism in the Southern and Island Colonies

    Early Puritanism in the Southern and Island Colonies

    Early Puritanism in the Southern and Island Colonies BY BABETTE M. LEVY Preface NE of the pleasant by-products of doing research O work is the realization of how generously help has been given when it was needed. The author owes much to many people who proved their interest in this attempt to see America's past a little more clearly. The Institute of Early American History and Culture gave two grants that enabled me to devote a sabbatical leave and a summer to direct searching of colony and church records. Librarians and archivists have been cooperative beyond the call of regular duty. Not a few scholars have read the study in whole or part to give me the benefit of their knowledge and judgment. I must mention among them Professor Josephine W, Bennett of the Hunter College English Department; Miss Madge McLain, formerly of the Hunter College Classics Department; the late Dr. William W. Rockwell, Librarian Emeritus of Union Theological Seminary, whose vast scholarship and his willingness to share it will remain with all who knew him as long as they have memories; Professor Matthew Spinka of the Hartford Theological Sem- inary; and my mother, who did not allow illness to keep her from listening attentively and critically as I read to her chapter after chapter. All students who are interested 7O AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY in problems concerning the early churches along the Atlantic seaboard and the occupants of their pulpits are indebted to the labors of Dr. Frederick Lewis Weis and his invaluable compendiums on the clergymen and parishes of the various colonies.
  • B a N I S T E R I A

    B a N I S T E R I A

    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
  • New England Colonies Blacklines.Qxd

    New England Colonies Blacklines.Qxd

    1 Name ____________________ The New England Colonies from Making the 13 Colonies series PRE-TEST Directions: Answer the following statements either true or false. 1. An attempt was made to colonize the New England region the same year the colony of Jamestown, Virginia, was founded. __________ 2. The people we call the Pilgrims founded the colony of Plymouth in 1720. ________ 3. There was greater religious freedom in the colony of Rhode Island than anywhere else in the 13 colonies. ________ 4. Mostly Quakers settled the Connecticut colony. ________ 5. Maine was never a colony but was part of the Massachusetts Bay colony. ________ 6. In England, Puritans attended Catholic Church services instead of those of the Church of England. ________ 7. People from the colony of Plymouth were the first settlers of New Hampshire. ________ 8. All the land of New Hampshire and Maine once belonged to two men. ________ 9. Vermont was first colony in New England. ________ 10. The business of slave trading was important in the colony of Rhode Island until it was finally banned right before the Revolutionary War. ________ ©2003 Ancient Lights Educational Media Published and Distributed by United Learning All rights to print materials cleared for classroom duplication and distribution. 2 Name ____________________ The New England Colonies from Making the 13 Colonies series POST-TEST Directions: Answer the following questions to the best of your ability. 1. What were some of the things that Puritans did not like about the Church of England? ______________________________________________________________________________________
  • Sora Rail in Stilly and the Identification of Immature Small Crakes D

    Sora Rail in Stilly and the Identification of Immature Small Crakes D

    Sora Rail in Stilly and the identification of immature small crakes D. I. M. Wallace The immature Sora Rail Porzana Carolina present on St Agnes, Isles of Scilly, from 26th September to 9th October 1973 (Brit. Birds, 67: 320; Scilly Bird Report for IQ73'- 19-21) was the first to be recorded in Europe since 1920. The record was accepted by both the Rarities Committee and the Records Committee of the British Ornithologists' Union, and the species was once again listed in category A of the British and Irish list (Ibis, 116: 578). This short paper, which stems from the decision to publish in this journal the details of records that result in category promotion, also includes some comparative notes on immature small crake identification. DETAILS OF THE SORA RAIL IN SCILLY The bird was first seen in the rushes of the Big Pool by D. Smallshire, but early opinions on its identity were hopelessly divided. DS, A. R. Dean and B. R. Dean persisted in seeing slight but distinct differences from the closely related Spotted Crake P. porzana, the species to which others ascribed the bird on the basis of its noticeably buff under tail. The literature available at the time implied that this was a character only of the Spotted Crake and the controversy might have remained unresolved but for the arrival of fresh, open- minded observers, some already familiar with Sora Rails. A phone call from DS to DIMW on 7th produced redoubled efforts at identification. Close attention had already been paid to the bird by B.
  • Biological-Control-Programmes-In

    Biological-Control-Programmes-In

    Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 This page intentionally left blank Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 Edited by P.G. Mason1 and D.R. Gillespie2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada iii CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 T: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 T: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org Chapters 1–4, 6–11, 15–17, 19, 21, 23, 25–28, 30–32, 34–36, 39–42, 44, 46–48, 52–56, 60–61, 64–71 © Crown Copyright 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery. Remaining chapters © CAB International 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electroni- cally, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biological control programmes in Canada, 2001-2012 / [edited by] P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-257-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests--Biological control--Canada. 2. Weeds--Biological con- trol--Canada. 3. Phytopathogenic microorganisms--Biological control- -Canada.
  • Life History Account for Sora

    Life History Account for Sora

    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SORA Porzana carolina Family: RALLIDAE Order: GRUIFORMES Class: AVES B146 Written by: E. Beedy Reviewed by: H. Cogswell Edited by: S. Granholm, R. Duke DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY In summer, fairly common and widespread in fresh emergent wetlands of northern California. It breeds throughout the San Francisco Bay area, north into Sonoma and Napa cos., throughout the Central Valley, and east of the Cascade-Sierra Nevada crest south at least to Mono Lake (Grinnell and Miller 1944). It probably breeds regularly in southern California mountains, but the only recent breeding record is from Fain Springs in the San Bernardino Mts. Historical nesting localities include Big Bear Lake in the San Bernardino Mts. and the Owens Valley, Inyo Co. There are a few summer records from the Salton Sea district and along the coastal lowlands, but recent nesting there has not been confirmed (Garrett and Dunn 1981). In winter, northern and high-elevation populations migrate southward. Widespread along the southern California coast in winter, as well as at the Salton Sea and the Colorado River, and visitors occasionally reach the Channel Islands (Garrett and Dunn 1981). There are historical, northern coast wintering records (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although absent from the immediate coast in summer (McCaskie et al. 1979), visits saline emergent wetlands in the nonbreeding season. Most common rail in California and North America, but numbers have been reduced by loss of wetlands. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Primarily forages on the ground in dense, emergent vegetation, but less commonly walks on mudflats in marsh openings, wades into water, or swims.
  • Science Notes Science

    Science Notes Science

    MDC Resource Science The Timing of Autumn Rail Migration in Missouri Yellow Rail Science Notes Science Sora Virginia Rail Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) 2017 VOLUME 12 NO. 3 The Timing of Autumn Rail Migration in Missouri By Auriel M.V. Fournier, University of Arkansas and Doreen C. Mengel, Missouri Department of Conservation Background Information: We do not have population estimates for the three Monitoring and conserving waterbirds in Missouri, study species so it is difficult to speculate if the including Sora (Porzana carolina), Virginia Rail (Rallus difference in number of detections is related to limicola), and Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis), population size, survey methodology, habitat are constrained by the lack of information on migration selection decisions, or differences in migration phenology. Understanding the timing of a species’ ecology. This question is worthy of future evaluation. migration is as important as knowing the species’ habitat needs and stopover ecology. Awareness regarding the time of year that habitat is needed is vital to inform habitat management, especially in highly ephemeral Figure 1 – Comparision of autumn migratory timing of habitats such as palustrine emergent wetlands. Public Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola), Yellow Rail (Coturnicops wetlands across the central United States, including noveboracensis) and Sora (Porzana carolina) from 2012 Missouri, are typically managed as migratory bird -2016 in Missouri USA. Virginia Rail and Yellow Rail stopover habitat, with a focus on waterfowl; other graphs represent the proportion of counts of individuals. wetland-dependent bird species, including rails, also use The Sora graph represents a smoothed spline of the these habitats although the timing of their need is less formal density estimates.