DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chaim Herzog Center

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chaim Herzog Center THE CHAIM HERZOG CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST STUDIES & DIPLOMACY מרכז חיים הרצוג לחקר המזרח התיכון והדיפלומטיה مركز حايم هرتصوغ لدراسات الشرق اﻷوسط والدبلوماسية Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva, Israel Vol. 18-19 April 2015 Israel and its Demand for Recognition as a Jewish State Prof. Yoram Meital Chair, The Chaim Herzog Center wenty-one years after the signing of the ‘Declaration T of Principles on Interim Self-Government Agreements’ (“Oslo Accords”), the relations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority are in a state of perpetual crisis. The causes of the crisis and the reasons for its continuation are manifold and diverse. However, each side has one contention regarding the main reason for not achieving a final status agreement ending the bloody historical conflict. PM Netanyahu at the UN, November 2014 President Mahmoud Abbas In this Issue: claims that “the settlement the Palestinians’ refusal to activity represents the core of recognize a Jewish state in any Israel and its Demand for 1-2 the policy of military colonial borders.” The end of occupation Recognition as a Jewish State occupation of the Palestinian and mutual recognition were the Conferences & Workshops 3-29 people’s territory and all the two pillars of the Oslo Accords, brutality of the aggression and meant to lead to a permanent Film Screening and Visitors 30-33 racial discrimination against our agreement and a resolution of Events 34-35 people that this policy entails.” the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin The dominant perception Jama‘a 36-37 Netanyahu has repeatedly among most Israelis is that the Scholarships 37-38 declared that “the core of the widespread opposition within conflict has always been and the PLO to recognize Israel as Calendar 39-40 unfortunately continues to be a Jewish state is an expression We Invite you to browse our new website: http://humweb2.bgu.ac.il/herzog/he; http://in.bgu.ac.il/hercen/Pages/default.aspx 1 of a denial of the legitimacy Palestinian narrative with regard of course, affected by regional of Israel’s very existence and to the 1948 War. developments, primarily the reflects opposition in principle to The second implication power struggles that began with the recognition of its sovereignty. stems from the fact that the the civil uprisings known as the This common perception is Israeli demand has been “Arab Spring.” The upheavals rooted in the failure to distinguish raised during the permanent in Egypt and Syria and the between the recognition of Israel status negotiations. First challenges that the governments and its recognition as a Jewish and foremost this stipulation in Jordan and Lebanon are state. basically undermines the facing had a significant impact Various groups in Arab Palestinian position regarding on the positions held by Israel societies are indeed opposed their sovereignty over a part of and the Palestinians. The Israeli to recognizing Israel. Yet, it is Jerusalem and their demand government has adopted a not true that all Arabs refuse to control the Haram al-Sharif policy that actually reflects a to recognize it. The peace complex – that is the Temple preference for the status quo agreements signed between Mount. Is it conceivable that and the rejection of negotiations Israel and Egypt, and with after gaining Arab recognition the conclusion of which will Jordan include explicit provisions as a Jewish state, Israel would require a significant withdrawal regarding the recognition of Israel; still be ready to compromise on and end its control over the and on the eve of the signing of the control over an area that West Bank. In this situation the the Oslo Accords, Yitzhak Rabin represents the site where the PA leadership places its hopes and Yasser Arafat exchanged inner sanctum of Judaism was in the international community. letters on the issue. However, located? And in the context of President Abbas’ policy seeks to there is no reference in these the Palestinian refugee issue, the convert the international support agreements to recognizing Israel recognition of Israel as a Jewish in principle for the establishment ‘as a Jewish state.’ Diplomatic state undermines any possibility of a Palestinian state into political and legal recognition of the of reaching an agreement on this action hoping that it will create State of Israel is a necessary charged issue. a new dynamic in the political condition for a peace agreement The third implication of the process with Israel. At the same with any Arab side. The (national recognition of Israel as a Jewish time, NGOs in Europe and the US and cultural) collective identity state pertains to its direct and promote initiatives of boycott and of Israeli society is an internal harsh repercussions for the sanctions against Israel. These matter. It is of course legitimate Palestinian minority among initiatives are controversial, and for the Israeli consensus to give Israel’s citizens, particularly it is questionable whether they expression to its Jewish identity. in relation to their link to their contribute to the accomplishment The demand for the Palestinian historical homeland. The last of the goals, some of them side to recognize the Jewish decade saw an ever growing declare to pursue. The status quo identity of the State of Israel is number of expressions of in the Israeli–Palestinian arena is not relevant to the signing of a alienation among the Jewish fragile and it is doubtful whether it peace agreement with them. majority in Israel from the will last much longer. The demand for the recognition minority’s positions regarding This complex situation poses of Israel as a Jewish state in the their historical and national a challenge for scholars of the context of the Israeli–Palestinian identity as an integral part of the Middle East. The issue 18-19 conflict, and in particular when Palestinian people. The events of the Chaim Herzog Center raised in the context of the final of October 2000 constitute a Newsletter testifies to the status negotiations, has three landmark in the way Israel’s importance we have given during main implications. The first entails Palestinian citizens perceive the the last two years to major issues, a denial of the very legitimacy state and the majority’s attitude including those mentioned of the Palestinian demand for toward them. The growing above. Many of the reviews recognition of their historical political support for the Right, presented in this volume have in rights to their homeland, or at least and especially its hawkish wing, common that they examine the the lion share thereof. Accepting finds clear expression in the issues in a broad Middle Eastern Netanyahu’s pre-requisite is Israeli public discourse and in context. This research position tantamount to Abu Mazen nationalist legislation. will continue to guide us in our agreeing to erase the memory The processes between extensive activities during the of the Nakba and eliminating the Israel and the Palestinians are, coming year. 2 CONFERENCES & W or K S H O P S International Workshop: Jewish Thought in Arab Societies 1880-1960 he international workshop to wider, global contexts and The speakers and discussants on Jewish Thought in circles. The workshop organizers included, among others, Yaron T Arab Societies from 1880 thought that such studies may Tsur, Gadi Algazi, Yigal Nizri, to 1960 was the highlight of the be important, helping to fill a Moshe Behar, Zvi Ben-Dor Benite, Chaim Herzog Center’s activities research lacuna, given that the Yuval Ivri, Almog Behar, Menashe in 2014. The participants were field of Jewish Intellectual History Anzi, Yaacov Yadgar, Liat Kozma, scholars from Israel, the USA, is usually associated with Jewish Yoram Meital, Zvi Zohar, Amnon and Europe. Within a wider trend thought that flourished in Europe Raz-Krakotzkin, Deborah Starr, of growing scholarly interest and was affected by the changes Haya Bambaji-Sasportas, Michelle in various aspects of Jewish occurring there. In contrast, the Campos, Abigail Jacobson, Orit history in the modern Middle intellectual history of the Middle Ouaknine-Yekutieli, Esther Meir- East, the workshop focused East is not sufficiently developed, Glitzenstein, Haggai Ram, André on the intellectual activities of and research on the contribution Levy, and Henriette Dahan-Kalev. Jews writing in Arabic, French, of Jews to a variety of ideas The participants’ papers were Hebrew, and English, examining developed in the region is still in its made available in advance which their work in the social, cultural initial stages. Promoting the study allowed for in-depth discussions and political context in which it of Jewish intellectual history of the on a variety of issues, including was created. Taking inspiration region may contribute to both of the intellectual world of Hayyim from the anthology Modern these major fields of knowledge. In Ben Kiki, Shehata Haroun, Rabbi Middle Eastern Jewish Thought: light of the state of historiography, David Buzaglo, Rabbi Yosef Writings on Identity, Politics, and the workshop organizers sought Hayyim, Rabbi Mas’oud Hai Ben Culture 1893–1958 (2013), edited to identify and reveal the texts that Shim’on, Rabbi Raphael Aharon by Moshe Behar (University of make up the “missing corpus” of Ben Shim’on, the filmmaker Togo Manchester) and Zvi Ben-Dor the rich works of Middle Eastern Mizrahi, and the historian Elie Benite (New York University), the Jewish intellectuals. Kedourie. Stimulating discussions workshop was largely conceived The workshop was attended dealt, among other issues, as a continuation of that project. by leading scholars along with with al-Andalus and how Saul The two important scholars, who a host of young researchers. Abdallah Yosef and Abraham edited the anthology, were among the organizers of the workshop. The premise of the workshop participants was that Jews were an integral part of the local societies and were affected in similar ways by the processes and changes occurring in Arab societies as well as by the challenges of modern philosophy stemming from the European Enlightenment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Privatizing Religion: the Transformation of Israel's
    Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious- Zionist community BY Yair ETTINGER The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. This paper is part of a series on Imagining Israel’s Future, made possible by support from the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of its author and do not represent the views of the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund, their officers, or employees. Copyright © 2017 Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu Table of Contents 1 The Author 2 Acknowlegements 3 Introduction 4 The Religious Zionist tribe 5 Bennett, the Jewish Home, and religious privatization 7 New disputes 10 Implications 12 Conclusion: The Bennett era 14 The Center for Middle East Policy 1 | Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious-Zionist community The Author air Ettinger has served as a journalist with Haaretz since 1997. His work primarily fo- cuses on the internal dynamics and process- Yes within Haredi communities. Previously, he cov- ered issues relating to Palestinian citizens of Israel and was a foreign affairs correspondent in Paris. Et- tinger studied Middle Eastern affairs at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and is currently writing a book on Jewish Modern Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Musical Instrument of Global Sounding Saadat Abdullayeva Doctor of Arts, Professor
    Focusing on Azerbaijan A musical instrument of global sounding Saadat ABDULLAYEVA Doctor of Arts, Professor THE TAR IS PRObabLY THE MOST POPULAR MUSICAL INSTRUMENT AMONG “The trio”, 2005, Zakir Ahmadov, AZERbaIJANIS. ITS SHAPE, WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM OTHER STRINGED INSTRU- bronze, 40x25x15 cm MENTS, IMMEDIATELY ATTRACTS ATTENTION. The juicy and colorful sounds to the lineup of mughams, and of a coming from the strings of the tar bass string that is used only for per- please the ear and captivate people. forming them. The wide range, lively It is certainly explained by the perfec- sounds, melodiousness, special reg- tion of the construction, specifically isters, the possibility of performing the presence of twisted steel and polyphonic chords, virtuoso passag- copper strings that convey all nuanc- es, lengthy dynamic sound rises and es of popular tunes and especially, attenuations, colorful decorations mughams. This is graphically proved and gradations of shades all allow by the presence on the instrument’s the tar to be used as a solo, accom- neck of five frets that correspondent panying, ensemble and orchestra 46 www.irs-az.com instrument. But nonetheless, the tar sounding board instead of a leather is a recognized instrument of solo sounding board contradict this con- mughams when the performer’s clusion. The double body and the mastery and the technical capa- leather sounding board are typical of bilities of the instrument manifest the geychek which, unlike the tar, has themselves in full. The tar conveys a short neck and a head folded back- the feelings, mood and dreams of a wards. Moreover, a bow is used play person especially vividly and fully dis- this instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • The Memory of the Yom Kippur War in Israeli Society
    The Myth of Defeat: The Memory of the Yom Kippur War in Israeli Society CHARLES S. LIEBMAN The Yom Kippur War of October 1973 arouses an uncomfortable feeling among Israeli Jews. Many think of it as a disaster or a calamity. This is evident in references to the War in Israeli literature, or the way in which the War is recalled in the media, on the anniversary of its outbreak. 1 Whereas evidence ofthe gloom is easy to document, the reasons are more difficult to fathom. The Yom Kippur War can be described as failure or defeat by amassing one set of arguments but it can also be assessed as a great achievement by marshalling other sets of arguments. This article will first show why the arguments that have been offered in arriving at a negative assessment of the War are not conclusive and will demonstrate how the memory of the Yom Kippur War might have been transformed into an event to be recalled with satisfaction and pride. 2 This leads to the critical question: why has this not happened? The background to the Yom Kippur War, the battles and the outcome of the war, lend themselves to a variety of interpretations. 3 Since these are part of the problem which this article addresses, the author offers only the barest outline of events, avoiding insofar as it is possible, the adoption of one interpretive scheme or another. In 1973, Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, fell on Saturday, 6 October. On that day the Egyptians in the south and the Syrians in the north attacked Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Armenian Tales: a Guide to the “Art” of Heritage Thievery KAMRAN IMANOV * Tall Armenian Tales: a Guide to the “Art” of Heritage Thievery
    KAMRAN IMANOV Tall Armenian Tales: a Guide to the “Art” of Heritage Thievery KAMRAN IMANOV * Tall Armenian Tales: a Guide to the “Art” of Heritage Thievery The book - “Tall Armenian Tales”, presented to the reader’s attention, consists of two thematic sections. Chapter I, entitled “I came, I saw, I... stole”, is about the misappropriation and armenization of intellectual property of the Azerbaijani people, intellectual plagiarism of the Azerbaijani folklore, dastans (epics) and other epic works, the desire to seize the Azerbaijani bayati (Azerbaijani folk poems), proverbs and sayings. The book also narrates about the “armenization” of tales, anecdotes, music and other samples of folk genre. What is the common of these various manifestations of Armenian plagiary shown in the chapter “I came, I saw, ..., I stole”? The fact is that, firstly, these “tales” do not have an Armenian origin, but only an Armenian presentation. These tales are alien to the Armenian people; in addition, these are the same “anecdotes” in allegorical meaning of this term in the form of absurdities - false statements shown in Chapter II - “The Theatre of Absurd.” PREFACE .............................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER I. “I came, I saw,.. .1 stole”: about the Armenian tradition of misappropriation of the Azerbaijani cultural heritage ............................................................... 8 §1. “I c a m e , w h i c h briefly tells about the mass settlement of the Armenians in the South Caucasus .............................. 9 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS §2. I s a w , w h i c h relates about what Armenians experienced in the South Caucasus .................................................................................... 14 §3. I stole”, which relates about the origins of the Armenian plagiarism .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Experience in Lebanon, 1982-1985
    THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE IN LEBANON, 1982-1985 Major George C. Solley Marine Corps Command and Staff College Marine Corps Development and Education Command Quantico, Virginia 10 May 1987 ABSTRACT Author: Solley, George C., Major, USMC Title: Israel's Lebanon War, 1982-1985 Date: 16 February 1987 On 6 June 1982, the armed forces of Israel invaded Lebanon in a campaign which, although initially perceived as limited in purpose, scope, and duration, would become the longest and most controversial military action in Israel's history. Operation Peace for Galilee was launched to meet five national strategy goals: (1) eliminate the PLO threat to Israel's northern border; (2) destroy the PLO infrastructure in Lebanon; (3) remove Syrian military presence in the Bekaa Valley and reduce its influence in Lebanon; (4) create a stable Lebanese government; and (5) therefore strengthen Israel's position in the West Bank. This study examines Israel's experience in Lebanon from the growth of a significant PLO threat during the 1970's to the present, concentrating on the events from the initial Israeli invasion in June 1982 to the completion of the withdrawal in June 1985. In doing so, the study pays particular attention to three aspects of the war: military operations, strategic goals, and overall results. The examination of the Lebanon War lends itself to division into three parts. Part One recounts the background necessary for an understanding of the war's context -- the growth of PLO power in Lebanon, the internal power struggle in Lebanon during the long and continuing civil war, and Israeli involvement in Lebanon prior to 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Left (First Draft) by Shmuel Hasfari and Eldad Yaniv
    The National Left (First Draft) by Shmu'el Hasfari and Eldad Yaniv Open Source Center OSC Summary: A self-published book by Israeli playwright Shmu'el Hasfari and political activist Eldad Yaniv entitled "The National Left (First Draft)" bemoans the death of Israel's political left. http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/osc/israel-left.pdf Statement by the Authors The contents of this publication are the responsibility of the authors, who also personally bore the modest printing costs. Any part of the material in this book may be photocopied and recorded. It is recommended that it should be kept in a data-storage system, transmitted, or recorded in any form or by any electronic, optical, mechanical means, or otherwise. Any form of commercial use of the material in this book is permitted without the explicit written permission of the authors. 1. The Left The Left died the day the Six-Day War ended. With the dawn of the Israeli empire, the Left's sun sank and the Small [pun on Smol, the Hebrew word for Left] was born. The Small is a mark of Cain, a disparaging term for a collaborator, a lover of Arabs, a hater of Israel, a Jew who turns against his own people, not a patriot. The Small-ists eat pork on Yom Kippur, gobble shrimps during the week, drink espresso whenever possible, and are homos, kapos, artsy-fartsy snobs, and what not. Until 1967, the Left actually managed some impressive deeds -- it took control of the land, ploughed, sowed, harvested, founded the state, built the army, built its industry from scratch, fought Arabs, settled the land, built the nuclear reactor, brought millions of Jews here and absorbed them, and set up kibbutzim, moshavim, and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Over Palestine
    Metula Majdal Shams Abil al-Qamh ! Neve Ativ Misgav Am Yuval Nimrod ! Al-Sanbariyya Kfar Gil'adi ZZ Ma'ayan Baruch ! MM Ein Qiniyye ! Dan Sanir Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid over Palestine Al-Sanbariyya DD Al-Manshiyya ! Dafna ! Mas'ada ! Al-Khisas Khan Al-Duwayr ¥ Huneen Al-Zuq Al-tahtani ! ! ! HaGoshrim Al Mansoura Margaliot Kiryat !Shmona al-Madahel G GLazGzaGza!G G G ! Al Khalsa Buq'ata Ethnic Cleansing and Population Transfer (1948 – present) G GBeGit GHil!GlelG Gal-'A!bisiyya Menara G G G G G G G Odem Qaytiyya Kfar Szold In order to establish exclusive Jewish-Israeli control, Israel has carried out a policy of population transfer. By fostering Jewish G G G!G SG dGe NG ehemia G AGl-NGa'iGmaG G G immigration and settlements, and forcibly displacing indigenous Palestinians, Israel has changed the demographic composition of the ¥ G G G G G G G !Al-Dawwara El-Rom G G G G G GAmG ir country. Today, 70% of Palestinians are refugees and internally displaced persons and approximately one half of the people are in exile G G GKfGar GB!lGumG G G G G G G SGalihiya abroad. None of them are allowed to return. L e b a n o n Shamir U N D ii s e n g a g e m e n tt O b s e rr v a tt ii o n F o rr c e s Al Buwayziyya! NeoG t MG oGrdGecGhaGi G ! G G G!G G G G Al-Hamra G GAl-GZawG iyGa G G ! Khiyam Al Walid Forcible transfer of Palestinians continues until today, mainly in the Southern District (Beersheba Region), the historical, coastal G G G G GAl-GMuGftskhara ! G G G G G G G Lehavot HaBashan Palestinian towns ("mixed towns") and in the occupied West Bank, in particular in the Israeli-prolaimed “greater Jerusalem”, the Jordan G G G G G G G Merom Golan Yiftah G G G G G G G Valley and the southern Hebron District.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mental Cleavage of Israeli Politics
    Israel Affairs ISSN: 1353-7121 (Print) 1743-9086 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fisa20 The mental cleavage of Israeli politics Eyal Lewin To cite this article: Eyal Lewin (2016) The mental cleavage of Israeli politics, Israel Affairs, 22:2, 355-378, DOI: 10.1080/13537121.2016.1140352 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2016.1140352 Published online: 04 Apr 2016. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fisa20 Download by: [Ariel University], [Eyal Lewin] Date: 04 April 2016, At: 22:06 ISRAEL AFFAIRS, 2016 VOL. 22, NO. 2, 355–378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2016.1140352 The mental cleavage of Israeli politics Eyal Lewin Department of Middle Eastern Studies and Political Science, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel ABSTRACT In societies marked by numerous diversities, like the Jewish-Israeli one, understanding social cleavages might show a larger picture of the group and form a broader comprehension of its characteristics. Most studies concentrate on somewhat conventional cleavages, such as the socioeconomic cleavage, the ethnic cleavage, the religious or the political one; this article, by contrast, suggests a different point of view for the mapping of social cleavages within Israeli society. It claims that the Jewish population in Israel is split into two competing groups: stakeholders versus deprived. These categories of social identity are psychological states of mind in which no matter how the national resources are distributed, the stakeholders will always act as superiors, even if they are in inferior positions, while the deprived will always take the role of eternal underdog even if all of the major political ranks come under their control.
    [Show full text]
  • Amil ASKEROV YALLI DANCES in NAKHCHIVAN MUSICAL CULTURE
    MUSİQİ DÜNYASI ____________________________________________________3 (76), 2018 Amil ASKEROV YALLI DANCES IN NAKHCHIVAN MUSICAL CULTURE Abstract The article is devoted to the Nakhchivan yallis, which have a special place and role in the musical culture of Azerbaijan. Based on the notes of Nakhchivan Yallis and the researches carried out, classification of yalli dances was conducted, and the area of spread was determined. The writing of the Yalli names has been revealed in connection with the terrain, man, tribal names, mythological outlook,and actions. The musical instruments used in accompaniment of yalli dances have been characterized. Comparative analysis of yallis in the Azerbaijan – Turkey area has been put forward as an important issue. Key words: Azerbaijan, Nakhchivan, yalli, genre, range, performance, note, classification, research. The Azerbaijani folk yallis, one of the oldest collective plays in the world, are a rare example of creativity that combines choreography, instrumental and vocal music. Yallı dances are one of the oldest folk dances in terms of genre, performance, and expression. For centuries, Nakhchivan has been known as the "homeland of yallis", "the land of yallis" among Caucasians, both Near and Middle East and Europe. Yalli is an ancient cultural monument of Nakhchivan's traditional musical heritage. The history of Yalli dance in Nakhchivan begins with the Bronze Age B. C.Yalli dances are described in the Gamigaya archaeological monument in Nakhchivan. Yally is a collective dance. This dance expresses the history of ancient Nakhchivan, the people's unity, labor, love for the motherland, heroism, freedom in music and dance. Great leader Heydar Aliyev called this dance "Nakhchivan's crown".
    [Show full text]
  • BENJAMIN HARY, Ph.D. Director, New York University Tel Aviv Professor of Hebrew and Judaic Studies, New York University
    BENJAMIN HARY, Ph.D. Director, New York University Tel Aviv Professor of Hebrew and Judaic Studies, New York University 36 Bnei Dan New York University Tel Aviv Tel Aviv 6226016, Israel +(972) 77-450-2650; Fax +(972) 77-450-2651 Mobile +(972) 54-590-5636 E-Mail: [email protected] INTERESTS 1. Judeo-Arabic Language and Linguistics 2. History of Jewish Languages and the Jewish Linguistic Spectrum 3. Jewish Religion, History, Society and Culture in the Middle East 4. Jews in the Islamic World 5. Arabic Linguistics and Dialectology 6. Arabic Language Use in Israel 7. Corpus Linguistics and Modern Hebrew 8. Sociolinguistics, Dialectology and Language Variation; Language and Religion 9. Proficiency-based Teaching of Hebrew and Arabic 10. Interactive Multimedia Software for Foreign Language Education EDUCATION Ph.D. in Near Eastern Studies, December 1987 Dissertation: “Judeo-Arabic, Written and Spoken in Egypt in the 16th and 17th Centuries” University of California, Berkeley M.A. with distinction in Near Eastern Studies, December 1979 University of California, Berkeley Teaching Credentials in Hebrew and Arabic, June 1978 Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel B.A. in Arabic and Hebrew, June 1976 Graduated magna cum laude, Dean’s Lists Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Professor, Skirball Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies, New York University, 2015-- Visiting Professor, Skirball Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies, New York University, 2014–2015 Director of Ney York University Tel Aviv, 2014–– CV-Hary 2 Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do They Hate Us?--Geography of the Palestine-Israel Conflict And
    “Why Do They Hate Us/U.S.?” and “Why Do We Hate Them?” Is It Because Of “Their” Islam Or Because Of “Our” Support For Israel? Geography of the Palestine-Israel Conflict Presentation to the Association of American Geographers, Boston, MA, April 2008, and Bloomington, IN, November 2008 Mohamed Elyassini, PhD, Associate Professor of Geography, Indiana State University 1. “The bonds between the United States and Israel are unbreakable and the commitment of the United States to the security of Israel is ironclad… I and my administration have made the security of Israel a priority. It’s why we’ve increased cooperation between our militaries to unprecedented levels. It’s why we’re making our most advanced technologies available to our Israeli allies. It’s why, despite tough fiscal times, we’ve increased foreign military financing to record levels. And that includes additional support –- beyond regular military aid -– for the Iron Dome anti-rocket system… So make no mistake, we will maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge… You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Here in the United States, we’ve imposed the toughest sanctions ever on the Iranian regime… You also see our commitment to Israel’s security in our steadfast opposition to any attempt to de-legitimize the State of Israel. As I said at the United Nations last year, ‘Israel’s existence must not be a subject for debate,’ and ‘efforts to chip away at Israel’s legitimacy will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of the United States.’ So when the Durban Review Conference advanced anti-Israel sentiment, we withdrew.
    [Show full text]