Productive Plastics' Fiberglass to Plastic Thermoforming Comparison
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Low Cost Vacuum-Forming System1
A LOW COST VACUUM-FORMING SYSTEM1 James P. O'Leary, M.S.2, Edward A. Bianchi, B.S.2, and Richard A. Foulds, M.S.2 Vacuum-forming is an excellent method for molding sheets of plastic into complicated shapes. It is just beginning to be used in the field of re habilitation medicine where the need to make devices that fit the human form is great. This article describes a new, inexpensive apparatus which enables orthotists and prosthetists to use the vacuum-forming process in their work with a very small outlay of capital. Very little training is required to use the apparatus, and it is now being made available in limited quantities. In the vacuum-forming process a sheet of hot, pliable plastic is drawn either into or around a mold with the use of suction provided by a vac uum pump. When the plastic cools and hardens, it retains the shape caused by the mold. An example of the usefulness of a molded orthosis is Fig. 1. A molded ankle-foot orthosis (left) is contrasted shown in Figure 1. to the conventional metal and leather orthosis that it The process, though simple, when adapted to replaces. Besides being lighter in weight, the plastic the needs of mass-production, requires very ex orthosis requires no modification to the shoe. This pensive machinery. Until recently only industrial feature makes it possible for the patient to interchange shoes easily. vacuum-forming equipment was available, with prices ranging from $4,000 to over $125,000. Because of the large investment in money and space required to obtain and use the machines With these thoughts in mind we designed and designed for mass production, very few medical built a vacuum-forming apparatus called the facilities have made use of the vacuum-forming "Bracemaker" (Fig. -
Thermoforming
APPLICATION GUIDE: Thermoforming TIME REQUIRED COST SKILL LEVEL By Brian Sabart, Stratasys Inc. and Jeff Gangel, Formech International, Ltd. OVERVIEW Vacuum Forming Materials: Thermoforming is a relatively simple manufacturing process that is inexpensive when compared to other - ABS plastic molding and forming methods. Although thermoforming is often associated with manufacturing - Polyvinylchloride (PVC) of packaging items such as blister packs and disposable coffee cup lids, the cost and time advantages - Polycarbonate (PC) are realized in a broad spectrum of products in an equally broad range of industries. When using a Fortus - Polyethylene (PE) 3D Production System with FDM technology to construct thermoforming tooling, the process becomes - Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) simpler, more efficient and increasingly cost-effective. - High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) - Polypropylene (PP) - Polystyrene (PS) PROCESS DESCRIPTION - Polyphenylene Oxide (PPO) Thermoforming is a collection of manufacturing methods that heat and form sheets of extruded plastic. - Polyphenylene Ether (PPE) Thermoforming processes include drape, vacuum and pressure forming. - Polymethyl-Methacrylate (PMMA) - Acrylic Drape forming relies on gravity to pull the sheet against the tool. Vacuum forming, as the name implies, - Closed Cell Foam Polyester (PBT, PET) draws the heated sheet against the tool with the assistance of a vacuum. Pressure forming combines - Polyester Copelymer (PETG) vacuum and pressure to simultaneously pull and push the plastic sheet to the contours of the tool. - Thermoplastic Olefin (TPO) - Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) This process guide documents the steps for vacuum forming since it is the most common thermoforming - Thermoplastic Rubber (TPR) method. However, many of the details presented may also be applied to drape and pressure forming. -
Radel® PPSU, Udel® PSU, Veradel® PESU & Acudel® Modified PPSU
Radel ® | Udel ® | Veradel ® | Acudel ® Radel® PPSU, Udel® PSU, Veradel® PESU & Acudel® modified PPSU Processing Guide SPECIALT Y POLYMERS 2 \ Sulfone Polymers Processing Guide Table of Contents Introduction ............................. 5 Part Ejection . 14 Draft . 14 Ejector pins and/or stripper plates . 14 Sulfone Polymers........................ 5 Udel® Polysulfone (PPSU) . 5 Injection Molding Equipment ............. 15 ® Veradel Polyethersulfone (PESU) . 5 Controls . 15 ® Radel Polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) . 5 Clamp . 15 ® Acudel modified PPSU . 5 Barrel Capacity . 15 Press Maintenance . 15 Resin Drying . .6 Screw Design . 15 Rheology................................ 8 Screw Tips and Check Valves . 15 Viscosity-Shear Rate ..................... 8 Nozzles . 16 Molding Process . 16 Resin Flow Characteristics . 9 Melt flow index . 9 Polymer Injection or Mold Filling . 16 Spiral flow . 9 Packing and Holding . 17 Injection Molding . .10 Cooling . 17 Molds and Mold Design .................. 10 Machine Settings ....................... 17 Tool Steels . 10 Barrel Temperatures . 17 Mold Dimensions . 10 Mold Temperature . 18 Mold Polishing . 10 Residence Time in the Barrel . 18 Mold Plating and Surface Treatments . 10 Injection Rate . 18 Tool Wear . 10 Back Pressure . 18 Mold Temperature Control . 10 Screw Speed . 18 Mold Types . 11 Shrinkage . 18 Two-plate molds . 11 Three-plate molds . 11 Regrind ............................... 19 Hot runner molds . 11 Cavity Layout . 12 Measuring Residual Stress ............... 19 Runner Systems . 12 Extrusion............................... 22 Gating . 12 Sprue gating . 12 Edge gates . 13 Predrying ............................. 22 Diaphragm gates . 13 Tunnel or submarine gates . 13 Extrusion Temperatures ................. 22 Pin gates . 13 Screw Design Recommendations . 22 Gate location . 13 Venting . 14 Sulfone Polymers Processing Guide / 3 Die Design ............................. 22 Extruded Product Types . 23 Wire . 23 Film . 23 Sheet . 23 Piping and tubing . 23 Start-Up, Shut-Down, and Purging ....... -
Phillip Fielder, PE, Chie
DRAFT OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION MEMORANDUM June 28, 2019 TO: Phillip Fielder, P.E., Chief Engineer THROUGH: Richard Groshong, Env. Programs Manager, Compliance & Enforcement THROUGH: Phil Martin, P.E., Manager, Existing Source Permits Section THROUGH: Ryan Buntyn, P.E., Existing Source Permits Section FROM: Iftekhar Hossain, P.E., New Source Permits Section SUBJECT: Evaluation of Permit Application No. 2018-0681-TVR2 Elliott Manufactured Homes, Inc. Glas-Pro Division Fiberglass Molding Facility Facility ID: 5700 Section 31, T3S, R7W, Jefferson County, Oklahoma Latitude: 34.24749° Longitude: -97.96698° Location: 100 W. Eva, Addington, Oklahoma 73520 I. INTRODUCTION Elliott Manufactured Homes, Inc. (Elliott) has requested to renew their existing major source Operating Permit No. 2012-1199-TVR that was issued November 26, 2013, for their existing Fiberglass Molding Facility (SIC 3088). No changes have been made to the facility since the issuance of last permit (No. 2012-1199-TVR). The applicant has been manufacturing shower tubs and stalls since before March 6, 1996. Elliott manufactures fiberglass shower tubs, stalls and other related products for use in the manufactured and residential home building industry. Units are manufactured utilizing an open mold process. Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) are generated and released from the fabrication process. The primary HAP generated from the facility is styrene, which is generated from the gelcoats and resins used in the fabrication processes. Particulate matter (PM) is generated during the sanding and finishing process and is filtered prior to air being exhausted to the outside. The applicant requests that a 75 TPY facility-wide Hazardous Air Pollutants cap continue as the facility emission limit. -
1.800.330.6365
First Quality Composite Materials GUARANTEED CARBON FIBER PG. 1 KEVLAR® PG. 5 FIBERGLASS PG. 7 EPOXY RESIN PG. 12 VINYL ESTER RESIN PG. 13 POLYESTER RESIN PG. 14 GEL COAT PG. 15 FOAM PG. 19 SANDWICH CORE PG. 20 VACUUM BAGGING PG. 21 WIND ENERGY PRODUCTS PG. 27 MOLD POLISH & RELEASE PG. 29 CHROMAVEILTM PG. 31 FABRIC RACKS PG. 32 SCISSORS & FABRIC AIDS PG. 33 ROLLERS & APPLICATORS PG. 35 MEASURING PG. 37 MIXING PG. 39 SAFETY & CLEANUP PG. 41 BOOKS & VIDEOS PG. 43 WE’RE OPEN LATER! 1.800.330.6365 WWW.FIBREGLAST.COM 8:00 am - 8:00 pm ET MON-FRI SHIPPING MERCHANDISE TOTAL SHIPPING CHARGE Under $100.00 $9.95 $100.01 - $250.00 $19.95 $250.01 - $375.00 $39.95 $375.01 - $500.00 $59.95 $500.01 - $750.00 $69.95 $750.01 - $1,000.00 $119.95 $1,000.01 - $1,500.00 $159.95 $1,500.01 - $3,000.00 $199.95 $3,000.01 - $5,000.00 $249.95 $5,000.01 and Over $399.95 First Quality Composite Materials CENTRAL LOCATION GUARANTEED 70% of the U.S. population can be reached in 3 days Fibre Glast materials are suitable for the most demanding applications, like shipping UPS ground from aerospace and racing. We only supply First Quality materials and that is one reason why we are The Professionals’ Choice. our location. HAZARD CHARGES Hazard charges are levied by UPS, FedEx, and all transportation companies. Fibre Glast does not profit from these charges. If applicable, hazard charges will be added to your product total before shipping your order. -
Reduction of Pollution and Hazardous Wastes: an Overview of Fiberglass Molding
\ a*@"' *wp I*#*, 60 sl.n* Reduction of Pollution and Hazardous Wastes: an Overview of Fiberglass Molding Darryl Davis ECU - Department of Manufacturing - Typical Fiberglass Products Boats Bathtubs and Showers Architectural Panels Truck Cabs and Bodies Automotive Bodies Pools and Hot-Tubs Ladders Institutional Furnishings Weather-Proof Utility Boxes Portable Toilets Communication Dish Structures Corrosion Resistant Tanks Corrosion Resistant Grating . %, * * -.- f*." ha, -. *a* 8% ' -P L L. -.I' h. ECU - Department of Manufacturing p~~ ic Cis 0 w Cis n Cis 0 u- rn. - Fiberglass Molding: Great Potential for Expansion Production Machinery Costs are Relatively Low Inexpensive Tooling Process New Products and Applications Growing Demand for Established Products Outstanding Mechanical and Physical Properties Corrosion Resistance Fatigue Resistance Strength-to-Weight-Ratio Weather Resistance Electrical Insulation Water Resistance Wear Resistance - ECU - Department of Manufacturing F Fiberglass Molding: Basic Processing Mold Preparation Apply Durable Surface Coating Atomized Spray Delivery of Resins Solvent Cleanup of Spray Equipment Encapsulate Reinforcing Fibers in a Plastic Matrix Atomized Spray Delivery of Resins Hand Rolling of Resin Solvent Cleanup for Workers and Tools Secondary and Finishing Operations Dust From Grinding and Cutting Operations Dust From Sanding Operations Fastening and Bonding May Require Use of Resins Solvents for Cleanup - ECU - Department of Manufacturing Potential Environmental Problems Use and Storage of Potentially -
Appendix B Air Quality Technical Report
Appendix B Air Quality Technical Report This page left intentionally blank Draft AVION BURBANK PROJECT Air Quality Technical Report Prepared for May 2018 City of Burbank Community Development 150 North Third Street Burbank, CA 91502-1264 Draft AVION BURBANK PROJECT Air Quality Technical Report Prepared for May 2018 City of Burbank Community Development 150 North Third Street Burbank, CA 91502-1264 233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 150 Santa Monica, CA 90401 310.451.4488 www.esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle Irvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Avion Burbank Project Air Quality Technical Report Page Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. -
Optimizing Thermoforming of High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Trays by Design of Experiments (DOE) Methodologies
Optimizing Thermoforming of High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Trays by Design of Experiments (DOE) Methodologies Vishal M. Dhagat Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, UConn Storrs, CT 06269-4157 [email protected] Ravindra Thamma Manufacturing & Construction Management, CCSU 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT 06050 [email protected] Abstract The process of heating and reshaping plastics sheet and film materials has been in use since the beginning of the plastics industry better known as thermoforming. Today this process is very ubiquitous for industrial products including signage, housings, and hot tubs. It also produces much of the packaging in use today including blister packs, cartons, and food storage containers. The process of thermoforming has many advantages over other methods for producing high quality plastic products, with some limitations, which can be resolved by implementing stringent quality control using scientific methods to improve process performance. Two areas of interest in today’s industry of great concerns are lean manufacturing operations and environment. Thermoforming of high impact polystyrene sheets using vacuum forming technique requires technical knowledge on material behavior, mold type, mold material, and process variables. Research on these various subjects is well documented but very limited research is done in process optimization of HIPS (High Impact Polystyrene). Design of Experiments (DOE) approaches like the face-centered cubic central composite design can be used to refine the process and to minimize rejects. In this paper, we present a case study on thermoforming of HIPS single use trays made on a semi automatic machine using three criteria solely based on the FCC Design method. The optimization of tray forming and wall thickness distribution is explored. -
Design Guidelines for the Thermoforming Process 1
Design guidelines for the thermoforming process 1 Design guidelines for product engineers on the thermoforming process U aangeboden door: Batelaan Kunststoffen BV ● Veerpolder 8 ● 2361KV Warmond T: 071-5613301 ● F: 071-5616701 ● www.batelaan.nl Zonder schriftelijke toestemming van de ProducentenVereniging Thermoplasten (PVT) mag niets uit deze informatiemap worden verveelvoudigd en/of openbaar gemaakt door middel van druk, fotokopie, microfilm of anderszins, hetgeen ook van toepassing is op de gehele of gedeeltelijke bewerking. Deze informatiemap is gebaseerd op de trainingmodules, gerealiseerd in het kader van T-ForM. Voor de eventuele aanwezigheid van (zet)fouten en onvolledigheden kan de PVT geen aansprakelijkheid aanvaarden. PVT, Postbus 420, 2260 AK Leidschendam, [email protected] www.t-form.eu July 2008 1 Design guidelines for the thermoforming process 2 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Thin Sheet Thermoforming ........................................................................................... 9 2.2 Thick Sheet Thermoforming ....................................................................................... 10 2.3 Tooling ...................................................................................................................... -
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 425 South Winchester Boulevard Project June 2020 SP19-065 and T19-042 C2K Architecture, Inc
GARDEN GATE TOWER / SAN JOSE, CA The Vision B.04 VIEW FROM NW ON S. MARKET Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 425 South Winchester Boulevard Project June 2020 SP19-065 and T19-042 C2K Architecture, Inc. SCH# XX 600 S 1st / San Jose, CA 19 Planning, Building and Code Enforcement ROSALYNN HUGHEY, DIRECTOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement has reviewed the proposed project described below to determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment as a result of project completion. “Significant effect on the environment” means a substantial or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. PROJECT NAME: 425 South Winchester Project PROJECT FILE NUMBERS: SP19-065 and T19-042 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Special Use Permit and Tentative Map to allow the demolition of an existing gas station and allow the construction of a five-story mixed-use building consisting of retail/commercial, office, and residential uses. The ground level would contain approximately 8,000 square feet of retail/commercial space; additionally, approximately 5,000 square feet office space would be provided on the second floor. The proposed project also includes two levels of underground parking and three levels of residential uses totaling 27 residential units. PROJECT LOCATION: 425 South Winchester Boulevard in the City -
The Dynisco Extrusion Processors Handbook 2Nd Edition
The Dynisco Extrusion Processors Handbook 2nd edition Written by: John Goff and Tony Whelan Edited by: Don DeLaney Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their contributions to this latest edition of the DYNISCO Extrusion Processors Handbook. First of all, we would like to thank John Goff and Tony Whelan who have contributed new material that has been included in this new addition of their original book. In addition, we would like to thank John Herrmann, Jim Reilly, and Joan DeCoste of the DYNISCO Companies and Christine Ronaghan and Gabor Nagy of Davis-Standard for their assistance in editing and publication. For the fig- ures included in this edition, we would like to acknowledge the contributions of Davis- Standard, Inc., Krupp Werner and Pfleiderer, Inc., The DYNISCO Companies, Dr. Harold Giles and Eileen Reilly. CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION TO EXTRUSION Single-Screw Extrusion . .1 Twin-Screw Extrusion . .3 Extrusion Processes . .6 Safety . .11 SECTION 2: MATERIALS AND THEIR FLOW PROPERTIES Polymers and Plastics . .15 Thermoplastic Materials . .19 Viscosity and Viscosity Terms . .25 Flow Properties Measurement . .28 Elastic Effects in Polymer Melts . .30 Die Swell . .30 Melt Fracture . .32 Sharkskin . .34 Frozen-In Orientation . .35 Draw Down . .36 SECTION 3: TESTING Testing and Standards . .37 Material Inspection . .40 Density and Dimensions . .42 Tensile Strength . .44 Flexural Properties . .46 Impact Strength . .47 Hardness and Softness . .48 Thermal Properties . .49 Flammability Testing . .57 Melt Flow Rate . .59 Melt Viscosity . .62 Measurement of Elastic Effects . .64 Chemical Resistance . .66 Electrical Properties . .66 Optical Properties . .68 Material Identification . .70 SECTION 4: THE SCREW AND BARREL SYSTEM Materials Handling . -
Equipment Requirements for Vacuum Forming Aristech Surfaces Acrylic Spas, Tub-Showers, Whirlpool Baths, & Small Marine Craft
TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET 4 Equipment Requirements for Vacuum Forming Aristech Surfaces Acrylic Spas, Tub-Showers, Whirlpool Baths, & Small Marine Craft Introduction This Technical Information Sheet was prepared to supplement Aristech Surfaces Technical Bulletins 140, 142, 144, and 152 covering acrylic FRP spas, tub-showers, whirlpool baths, and small marine craft. These bulletins outline the complete process, equipment required and costing information in enough detail to allow a potential manufacturer to design an operating facility provided the technical service offered by the many materials and equipment suppliers is utilized. This document will describe in more detail the equipment required for vacuum forming and supporting the formed unit for fiberglassing. Two types of vacuum forming machines will be specified; a low cost outfit and a higher priced semi-automatic machine. This document is directed to manufacturers of polyester gel coated units who are interested in converting to acrylic surfaced units or wish to add acrylic surfaced units to their current line of products. It is assumed that a manufacturer of gel coated units will not need assistance in fiberglassing the acrylic vacuum formed part once it is jigged since the two processes are nearly identical from that point. After the part is fiberglassed it can be trimmed as gel coated parts are, therefore, no additional information beyond that given in the technical bulletins is supplied. Molds The most economical vacuum forming mold is an exact replica of the finished product made from either tooling grade polyester or epoxy. The master tool used for making Gel Coat molds often will serve as a working vacuum forming mold with minor modifications.