142Nd Meeting of the Board of Directors 10.30Am, Thursday 5 Nov 2020 by Web-Ex AGENDA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

142Nd Meeting of the Board of Directors 10.30Am, Thursday 5 Nov 2020 by Web-Ex AGENDA 142nd Meeting of the Board of Directors 10.30am, Thursday 5 Nov 2020 By Web-ex AGENDA ITEM Purpose Presented by Category Time General business 5 mins Apologies for absence and To receive and record apologies for declaration of any conflicts of Andy Trotter 1 absence and request and record any Governance interest Chair declarations of interest • Azara Mukhtar (apologies) Minutes of the Board of To approve the minutes of the last Andy Trotter 2 Directors’ Meeting held on 3 Governance meeting Chair p4 September 2020 To confirm actions allocated at Matters arising Andy Trotter 3 previous meetings have been Governance • Board Actions Tracker Chair p12 completed To accept the BAF and consider whether the framework continues to Andy Trotter 4 Board Assurance Framework Governance provide sufficient assurance to the Chair p14 board Governance and Strategy 90 mins To note the developments within the Matthew Trainer, 5 Chief Executive Report trust and in the local health Strategy Chief Executive p22 economy. Matthew Trainer, Chief Executive/ Abi Fadipe, Deputy Medical Director/Lorraine To discuss and agree the strategy 6 Oxleas Strategy - presentation Regan, Service Strategy proposals p25 Director/ Rachel Clare Evans, Director of Strategy and People Iain Dimond, Operational update and Quality and 7 To note the update Chief Operating integrated performance report Performance p26 Officer Michael Witney, Pre Admission Suite inquiry report To note the report and agree future 8 Director of Governance – progress update oversight process p79 Therapies Jane Wells, To note the reports and consider any 9 RW incident report Director of Governance implications p92 Nursing Jane Wells, To note the reports and consider any 10 Mortality Surveillance Report Director of Governance implications p94 Nursing Page 1 of 3 142nd Meeting of the Board of Directors 10.30am, Thursday 5 Nov 2020 By Web-ex AGENDA Ify Okocha, 11 Quality Account To approve the report Governance Medical Director p103 Ify Okocha, 12 Quality Management Framework To approve the proposed approach Governance p160 Medical Director Michael Witney, Patient experience of virtual To note the reports and consider any 13 Director of Strategy consultations implications p179 Therapies The Workforce Disability Equality Rachel Clare Standard (WDES) and Workforce To approve the action plans and Evans, Director of 14 Race Equality Standard (WRES) Governance report and consider any implications Strategy and action plans and Equality annual p265 People report Committee reports 20 mins Performance and Quality Yemisi Gibbons, To note the contents of the report Quality and 15 Assurance Committee Non Executive and agree any strategic implications performance p303 • Complaints annual report Director Amlan Basu, Quality Improvement and To note the contents of the report Quality and 16 Non Executive Innovation Committee and agree any strategic implications performance p318 Director Jo Stimpson, To note the contents of the report Financial strategy 17 Business Committee Non Executive and agree any strategic implications and performance p322 Director Jo Stimpson, To note the contents of the report Strategic 18 Partnership Committee Non Executive and agree any strategic implications partnerships p344 Director Suzanne Shale, To note the contents of the report Strategy and 19 Infrastructure Committee Non Executive and agree any strategic implications performance p346 Director Nina Hingorani- Workforce Committee To note the contents of the report Crain, 20 • Freedom to Speak Up People strategy and agree any strategic implications Non Executive p352 summary report Director To note the contents of the report Steve Dilworth 21 Audit and Risk Assurance report and approve the risk appetite Non Executive Governance p355 framework Director Nominations Committee for Andy Trotter, 22 Executive Board Director To note the contents of the report Governance Chair p369 appointments report Page 2 of 3 142nd Meeting of the Board of Directors 10.30am, Thursday 5 Nov 2020 By Web-ex AGENDA Board reports 15 mins Information relating to the experience of staff and patients and Andy Trotter Quality and staff 23 Board visits reports p370 assess impact on delivery of trust Chair engagement objectives Andy Trotter Council of Governors update and To note the contents of the report Chair/ 24 proposals for changes to the and approve the proposed changes Governance Sally Bryden, p382 Constitution to the Trust Constitution Trust Secretary Board committee development Sally Bryden, 25 To approve the paper and structure Governance p387 report Trust Secretary ANY OTHER BUSINESS REVIEW EFFECTIVENESS OF MEETING DATE OF NEXT MEETING The next Board of Directors Meeting will take place on: Thursday 14 January at 10.30am Page 3 of 3 Board of Directors Item 2 5 November 2020 Enclosure 2 Report Title Minutes of the Board of Directors Meeting held on 3 September 2020 Author Susan Owen, Risk and Governance Manager Accountable Director Andy Trotter, Chair Confidentiality/ Public FOI status Report Summary Minutes of the Board of Directors meeting held on 3 September 2020 Purpose (To select purpose, Information To Note click on relevant choice for drop down box) Approval √ Decision Recommendation The Board agrees the minutes as a true record of the meeting. Link to strategic objectives Quality Workforce Sustainability Partnerships (click on relevant choice for drop down box) Link to Board N/A Assurance Framework Implications Quality Financial Equality analysis Service user/carer/staff 141st Meeting of the Board of Directors Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 3 September 2020 Virtual meeting held via MS Teams Board of Directors Andy Trotter Trust Chair Steve Dilworth Non-executive Director Nina Hingorani-Crain Non-executive Director Steve James Non-executive Director Jo Stimpson Non-executive Director Suzanne Shale Non-executive Director Dr Amlan Basu Non-executive Director Yemisi Gibbons Non-executive Director Matthew Trainer Chief Executive Iain Dimond Chief Operating Officer Dr Ify Okocha Medical Director Jane Wells Director of Nursing Dr Michael Witney Director of Therapies Rachel Evans (RCE) Director for Strategy and People Azara Mukhtar Interim Director of Finance In attendance Sally Bryden Trust Secretary and Associate Director of Corporate Affairs Tom Clark Deputy Medical Director Abi Fadipe Deputy Medical Director Alison Furzer Director of Informatics Susan Owen Risk and Governance Manager (minutes) Members of the Council of Governors in attendance Sue Hardy Public: Bexley Sue Read Staff: Bexley adult services Item Subject Action 1 Apologies for absence Noted • None received. Declarations of interest • None raised. 2 Minutes of last meeting Approved Page 1 – Amend action to read as: “An update on health and safety will be discussed at the Workforce Committee and potentially at a future Board Strategy Day.” Item 8 – Amend SS’s comment to read: “I understand Victoria Ellis is in the process of developing a revised quality management framework, and a revised approach may help with addressing issues around spread of learning.” Item 9 – Amend to narrative to read as: “The number of cases are lower than for the same period last year, but the Staff Partnership Team took a slightly different approach involving team discussions. The new service is confident that we are achieving a good level of cases, but we will continue to raise their profile.” Item 10 – Amend SS’s comment to read as: “…if we do not do this, we will not be ensuring the charitable funds are used to fulfil the purpose for which they were given.” Pending these amendments, the minutes of the meeting on 2 July 2020 were approved as an accurate record. 3 Matters arising Noted No matters arising. Page 1 of 7 Item Subject Action 4 Board Assurance Framework and Covid-19 risks Noted The board noted the Board Assurance Framework and Covid-19 risk register. MT said that in relation to risk ID 1709 (responding to service delivery concerns), the trust has received a number of questions from the CQC and complaints have been raised with them some of which are multiple concerns raised by a small number of people. The Quality Assurance Team have worked hard to respond to these, and a detailed paper will be presented to the executive team and the Performance and Quality Assurance Committee. MT said that our strategic risks are likely to be re-shaped over the coming months. AM said that no specific risk issues have been identified from the Transformation Programme Executive Group. The Covid-19 finance risk remains unchanged for the present, and the future of this risk is predicated on the month 7 outcome. SS – Those comments have addressed my observations. I am interested to know the risks that we will need to focus on in the next months. At the November meeting, it would helpful to have this conversation and take stock. AT – We will ask the executive to consider how to take this forward. JS – Periodically, the leadership group could review our organisational risks and how we refresh these. AB – For risk ID 1875 (impact of Covid-19 on service delivery, are we truly confident that scaling back services has not affected patient outcomes and experience? ID – This risk was written at a particular point in time. The directorate operational reviews have identified that there are legacy issues which are impacting on services. We will re- articulate the risk for the current situation. 5 Chief Executive Report Noted MT presented the Chief Executive Report. The trust is returning to pre-Covid-19 levels of service, in addition to managing a backlog, and preparing for usual winter pressures. There will be additional local impacts relating to the re-opening of schools. The trust is in a good position to take advantage of the strength of communication across the teams, and learning at ICS level. District nursing teams are experiencing a high level of demand, and we will need to respond to this. We recognise that there may be some actions as a result of the recent CQC inspection of CMHTs.
Recommended publications
  • 5. Hampstead Ridge
    5. Hampstead Ridge Key plan Description The Hampstead Ridge Natural Landscape Area extends north east from Ealing towards Finsbury and West Green in Tottenham, comprising areas of North Acton, Shepherd’s Bush, Paddington, Hampstead, Camden Town and Hornsey. A series of summits at Hanger Lane (65m AOD), Willesden Green Cemetery (55m AOD) and Parliament Hill (95m AOD) build the ridge, which is bordered by the Brent River to the north and the west, and the Grand Union Canal to the south. The dominant bedrock within the Landscape Area is London Clay. The ENGLAND 100046223 2009 RESERVED ALL RIGHTS NATURAL CROWN COPYRIGHT. © OS BASE MAP key exception to this is the area around Hampstead Heath, an area 5. Hampstead Ridge 5. Hampstead Ridge Hampstead 5. of loam over sandstone which lies over an outcrop of the Bagshot Formation and the Claygate Member. The majority of the urban framework comprises Victorian terracing surrounding the conserved historic cores of Stonebridge, Willesden, Bowes Park and Camden which date from Saxon times and are recorded in the Domesday Book (1086). There is extensive industrial and modern residential development (most notably at Park Royal) along the main rail and road infrastructure. The principal open spaces extend across the summits of the ridge, with large parks at Wormwood Scrubs, Regents Park and Hampstead Heath and numerous cemeteries. The open space matrix is a combination of semi-natural woodland habitats, open grassland, scrub and linear corridors along railway lines and the Grand Union Canal. 50 London’s Natural Signatures: The London Landscape Framework / January 2011 Alan Baxter Natural Signature and natural landscape features Natural Signature: Hampstead Ridge – A mosaic of ancient woodland, scrub and acid grasslands along ridgetop summits with panoramic views.
    [Show full text]
  • The Park Keeper
    The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid
    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crystal Palace
    The Crystal Palace The Crystal Palace was a cast-iron and plate-glass structure originally The Crystal Palace built in Hyde Park, London, to house the Great Exhibition of 1851. More than 14,000 exhibitors from around the world gathered in its 990,000-square-foot (92,000 m2) exhibition space to display examples of technology developed in the Industrial Revolution. Designed by Joseph Paxton, the Great Exhibition building was 1,851 feet (564 m) long, with an interior height of 128 feet (39 m).[1] The invention of the cast plate glass method in 1848 made possible the production of large sheets of cheap but strong glass, and its use in the Crystal Palace created a structure with the greatest area of glass ever seen in a building and astonished visitors with its clear walls and ceilings that did not require interior lights. It has been suggested that the name of the building resulted from a The Crystal Palace at Sydenham (1854) piece penned by the playwright Douglas Jerrold, who in July 1850 General information wrote in the satirical magazine Punch about the forthcoming Great Status Destroyed Exhibition, referring to a "palace of very crystal".[2] Type Exhibition palace After the exhibition, it was decided to relocate the Palace to an area of Architectural style Victorian South London known as Penge Common. It was rebuilt at the top of Town or city London Penge Peak next to Sydenham Hill, an affluent suburb of large villas. It stood there from 1854 until its destruction by fire in 1936. The nearby Country United Kingdom residential area was renamed Crystal Palace after the famous landmark Coordinates 51.4226°N 0.0756°W including the park that surrounds the site, home of the Crystal Palace Destroyed 30 November 1936 National Sports Centre, which had previously been a football stadium Cost £2 million that hosted the FA Cup Final between 1895 and 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Borough Transport Objectives
    Chapter Two Objectives 2. Borough Transport Objectives 2.1 Introduction This chapter sets out Hammersmith & Fulham’s Borough Transport Objectives for the period 2011 - 2014 and beyond, reflecting the timeframe of the revised MTS. The structure is as follows: • Sections 2.2 and 2.5 describe the local context firstly providing an overview of the borough characteristics and its transport geography, and then summarising the London- wide, sub-regional and local policy influences which have informed the preparation of this LIP. • Section 2.6 sets out Hammersmith & Fulham’s problems, challenges and opportunities in the context of the Mayor’s transport goals and challenges for London, and looks at the main issues which need to be addressed within the borough in order to deliver the revised MTS goals. • Finally section 2.7 sets out our Borough Transport Objectives for this LIP, which have been created by the issues identified in Sections 2.2 to 2.6. 2.2 About Hammersmith & Fulham The borough of Hammersmith & Fulham is situated on the western edge of inner London in a strategic location on the transport routes between central London and Heathrow airport. The orientation of the borough is north to south, with most major transport links, both road and rail, carrying through-traffic from east to west across the borough. Some of the busiest road junctions in London are located in the borough at Hammersmith Broadway, Shepherds Bush Green and Savoy Circus and the borough suffers disproportionately from the effects of through-traffic. North-south transport links in the borough are not as good as east-west links.
    [Show full text]
  • Londons Bridges: the Bridges of the Royal River Free
    FREE LONDONS BRIDGES: THE BRIDGES OF THE ROYAL RIVER PDF Ian Pay | 128 pages | 05 May 2009 | AAPPL Artists & Photographers Press Limited | 9781904332909 | English | London, United Kingdom 12 Of The Most Beautiful Bridges in London (with photos) - DELVE INTO EUROPE Show all questions. London 03 Find the correct answers. London London is the capital of Great Britain. It is situated in the Londons Bridges: The Bridges of the Royal River of England on the River Thames and there are lots of bridges across the Thames. The most famous of these bridges is Tower Bridge. The machinery which draws up the bridge when a ship passes under it is hidden in the two towers. It is a big castle, its oldest part, White Tower, dates back to the times of William the Conqueror. Back in history The Tower served as a prison - now it is one of London's main tourist attractions. Tourists are guided by "Beefeaters" in historic uniforms and the Crown Jewels are on display there. Another magnet for tourists is St. Paul's Cathedral. It is Sir Christopher Wren's masterpiece. Like many other churches it was built after the great fire had destroyed big parts of London in It is metres high and steps lead up to the Whispering Gallery in the dome. In the royal wedding between Prince Charles and Lady Diana was celebrated there. The coronation of the Kings and Queens takes place in Westminster Abbey. Near this enormous church there are the Houses of Parliament, the seat of the British government. They consist of a group of buildings, among them St.
    [Show full text]
  • London in Bloom Results 2015 the London in Bloom Borough of The
    London in Bloom Results 2015 The London in Bloom Borough of the Year Award 2015 Islington Gardeners Large City London Borough of Brent Silver Gilt London Borough of Hillingdon Silver Gilt London Borough of Ealing Gold London Borough of Havering Gold & Category Winner City Group A London Borough of Haringey Silver London Borough of Merton Silver London Borough of Sutton Silver Gilt Westminster in Bloom Gold & Category Winner City Group B Royal Borough of Greenwich Silver Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Silver London Borough of Tower Hamlets Gold Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Gold Islington Gardeners Gold & Category Winner Town City of London Gold London Village Kyle Bourne Village Gardens, Camden Silver Barnes Community Association, Barnes Silver Gilt Hale Village, Haringey Silver Gilt Twickenham Village, Richmond upon Thames Silver Gilt Walthamstow Village in Bloom, Waltham Forest Gold & Category Winner Town Centre under 1 sq. km. Elm Park Town Centre, Havering Silver Canary Wharf, Tower Hamlets Gold & Category Winner Business Improvement District Croydon Town Centre BID, Croydon Bronze The Northbank BID, Westminster Bronze Kingstonfirst Bid, Kingston upon Thames Silver Gilt The London Riverside BID, Havering Silver Gilt Waterloo Quarter BID, Lambeth Silver Gilt London Bridge in Bloom, Southwark Silver Gilt & Category Winner Urban Community Charlton Triangle Homes, Greenwich Silver Gilt Bankside – Bankside Open Spaces Trust, Better Bankside/Southwark Silver Gilt & Category Winner Common of the Year (Sponsored by MPGA) Tylers
    [Show full text]
  • BRAYBROOK STREET SHAFT Crossing the Capital, Connecting the UK CROSSRAIL PROPOSALS
    BRAYBROOK STREET SHAFT Crossing the Capital, Connecting the UK CROSSRAIL PROPOSALS Old Oak School eet ook Str Wormwood Scrubs Street Park Braybr Wulfstan HM Prison Wormwood Scrubs Braybrook Street Shaft Intermediate shafts are required where there are Emergency Access - Firefighters and distances of more than 1km between stations. emergency services will need access to the tunnels in the event of an incident. They serve several purposes: Emergency Evacuation - Passengers would Ventilation - Fresh air is needed to keep be guided to the nearest station except in temperatures comfortable in the tunnels and situations where they are more than 2km provide cooling around trains. apart. Some shafts therefore will be designed to bring passengers to the surface. Smoke Extraction - In an emergency the shafts will be used to keep the evacuation routes free from smoke. Braybrook Street Shaft 1i0601-w6v01-50004 Manor Seven Chadwell Gidea Heathrow Hayes and Harlington Ealing Broadway Stratford Park Kings Heath Park Brentwood Tottenham Liverpool Forest Ilford Goodmayes Romford Harold Shenfield Paddington Court Road Street Gate Wood Hampton Strawberry Bond Street Farringdon Whitechapel Custom Slade Stone Wick Hill Richmond Gunnersbury House Belvedere Green Crossing Swanscombe Kingston Teddington Twickenham Kew Turnham Braybrook Street Isle of Abbey Erith Dartford Greenhithe Ebbsfleet Gardens Green Shaft Dogs Wood Crossrail BRAYBROOK STREET SHAFT Crossing the Capital, Connecting the UK SHAFT DESIGN Braybrook Street Shaft A ventilation and emergency intervention shaft A surface structure would be required to enable would be required in the south west part of access to the tunnel in an emergency. The Wormwood Scrubs Park. The shaft would be design of the surface structure will be subject to approximately 16 metres in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Wormwood Scrubs and Hammersmith Hospital
    Buses from Wormwood Scrubs and Hammersmith Hospital N7 Northolt Key 7 Day buses in black N7 Night buses in blue —O Connections with London Underground o Connections with London Overground R Connections with National Rail B Connections with river boats HARLESDEN M Early mornings and evenings only Harlesden The yellow tinted area includes every bus G Jubilee Clock stop up to about one-and-a-half miles from Daytimes only when Wetland Centre is open Harlesden Wormwood Scrubs and Hammersmith Park Parade Hospital. Main stops are shown in the white Yeading area outside. WEST END White Hart Harrow Road Willesden Junction N7 24 hour Furness Road 7 220 service Oxford Circus Scrubs Lane Harrow Road/College Park Scrubs Lane Cumberland Business Park Route finder Scrubs Lane Bond Street Hythe Road for Selfridges Day buses including 24-hour services Scrubs Lane Mitre Bridge Bus route Towards Bus stops East Acton Industrial ○D○E○G○K○S 7 Brunel Road 7 East Acton Telford Way Estate M Marble Arch S I 24 hour W T B Barlby Road Ladbroke Grove 72 service C R Oxford Circus ○A○B○C○Q○T R AY R Greenford E G E Dalgarno Gardens Wormwood U WS Kensal House East Acton B A Red Lion Perivale 283 S R Scrubs D T Acton ○D○F○G○K○S E E 70 Telford Way Park L N Barlby Road A R D N S A Ladbroke Grove South O Barlby ○A○B○C○Q○T Hanger Lane E R South Kensington Greenford Linford Barlby Road Gardens Sainsbury’s Old Oak Common Lane Christie LE PO Highlever Road 24 hour L ○D○E○G○N○P Long Drive Stadium H A Edgware Road service East Acton Industrial Estate ©P1ndar RT T 72 Dormer’s O IM N E E St Charles’ Centre Ladbroke Grove Wells Park Royal Y R Roehampton ○A○B○C○L○M N R for Health and Kensal House Lane H D A Wellbeing M Shepherd’s Bush ○M○Y○○Z○ ARTIL 95 Western Avenue Sports Southall RD Allan Way Old Oak Common Lane Hammersmith Ground ○N○V○W○X Town Hall Hospital Ladbroke Grove Southall The Fairway W L East U Wormwood E Barlby Road R St Mary’s Hospital 95 LF 24 hour S S Y ○H○J○K○L○M Acton T T Scrubs Prison service Wandsworth R A L 220 E WO St Mark’s Road N N ET AD Gypsy Corner .
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Wormwood Scrubs Strategy
    7. WORMWOOD SCRUBS STRATEGY 107 WORMWOOD SCRUBS Key facts Approximate area: 68 hectares Designations: Metropolitan Open Land, Wormwood Scrubs Act, Commons Act, part covered by a Nature Conservation Area 7.1 Covering almost 68 hectares, responsibility of the Wormwood Scrubs (Boroughwide Grade 1 Importance). Wormwood Scrubs is the largest open space Charitable Trust. The Linford Christie Managed by the Wormwood Scrubs in the London Borough of Hammersmith Stadium provides changing facilities which Charitable Trust & Fulham and is green lung that provides are used by sports pitch users during people and wildlife with the opportunity match days. to enjoy green amenity space. The PRINCIPLE WS1: Wormwood Scrubs open space is managed 7.4 Over half of the Scrubs comprises a mix PROTECT & ENHANCE by the Wormwood Scrubs Charitable Trust of young and established woodland, scrub, and is protected by the Wormwood Scrubs grassland and tall herbaceous vegetation The Mayor will: Act 1879, the Commons Act 2006 and as which gives the Scrubs a sense of wildness a. Ensure the valuable ecology of Metropolitan Open Land in the London that is a unique characteristic, in particular Wormwood Scrubs is maintained and Plan, which affords the Scrubs the same given is proximity to central London. There where appropriate enhanced; level of protection as Metropolitan Green is a combination of diverse habitats across b. Maintain and where appropriate Belt. This protection will continue and the Wormwood Scrubs that support a diverse enhance Wormwood Scrubs as an Mayor of London will not seek to change range of native plants, breeding birds and area for exercise and recreation for the the Acts or its designation as Metropolitan insects, including species not usually found inhabitants of the metropolis; Open Land.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 the Natural Landscape of London
    2.0 The Natural Landscape of London London: A Green City? Contrary to perceptions, London is an unusually green city as of how they contribute to the city as a whole. This disconnection ‘natural’ environment. This may be the case for those architectures compared to other major world centres such as New York and Tokyo. between our daily experience of London and its relatively ‘green’ which reject the vernacular – notably modernism, which aimed at Nevertheless, for many, the impression of London is that of a highly character is exacerbated by the prevalence of travel by Underground, an international style − but vernacular architecture has by definition built up urban area, surrounded by less dense residential suburbs, whilst the topography of London, albeit gentle, has largely been an intimate relationship with its locale, whether as a form, such and whilst the Royal Parks are much-loved for their serenity and their disguised by London’s built environment. as the pitched roof, a direct response to frequent rainfall, or in the amenity value, how far we integrate them into our wider perception use of local building materials. Yet it is difficult to think of London’s of London is questionable. Likewise, whilst Londoners may regularly Underlying such perceptions is not only the disparity between architecture as vernacular, even though, to a large extent, London’s use local green spaces such as parks and commons, they are not daily living and travelling and a city-wide perspective but, perhaps built environment is derived from, rather than in opposition to, its necessarily perceived as integral parts of London’s character; private deeper, a fundamental assumption that architecture and urban underlying natural condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 Chair’S Report
    Urbanwise.London The Urban Studies Centre Annual Report 2018 Chair’s Report This year, in addition to our regular projects, we were pleased to start a number of new initiatives with west London schools. The Energy Champions project, supported by The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, was piloted in the spring term of 2018 with two Kensington and Chelsea schools and received very positive feedback from teachers and children. It will continue next year with the aim of encouraging children to promote reductions in energy use at school and home. A grant from Ernest Cook Trust enabled us to work with our first Wandsworth school, Falconbrook Primary School, who helped us to develop some new riverside trails exploring the fascinating history and geography of Wandsworth’s Riverside. We were also able to offer two Kensington and Chelsea schools our Street Detectives project, exploring their local area with a particular We were pleased to welcome three new trustees onto the Board focus on researching air pollution issues, thanks to funding from at our last AGM, Jan Parnell, Chloe Kenny and Mike Lachowicz. Westway Trust and Tesco. We worked in partnership with West Jan has extensive experience in education at a senior level, Mike London Zone to deliver a bespoke project for a small group is an experienced environmental consultant who has previously of children from Old Oak primary school using the wonderful run education programmes and Chloe is a keen geographer expanses of Wormwood Scrubs for outdoor learning. who is currently working for the government. We were sorry to This year, as well as our busy Schools Programme, we were lose Jill Carey from the Board of Trustees, due to her move up pleased to offer community projects with various groups in a to Cheshire, but she remains a friend and advisor.
    [Show full text]