Bite Forces in Sympatric Australian Skinks Domenic D'amore Daemen College, [email protected]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Daemen College Daemen Digital Commons Faculty Articles Faculty Scholarship 2018 Increasing Dietary Breadth Through Allometry: Bite Forces in Sympatric Australian Skinks Domenic D'Amore Daemen College, [email protected] David Meadows Simon Clulow Jeremiah Sean Doody David Rhind See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation D'Amore, D., Meadows, D., Clulow, S., Doody, J., McHenry, C., & Rhind, D. (2018). Increasing Dietary Breadth Through Allometry: Bite Forces in Sympatric Australian Skinks. Herpetology Notes, 11, 179-187. This paper is posted at Daemen Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar/52 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Domenic D'Amore, David Meadows, Simon Clulow, Jeremiah Sean Doody, David Rhind, and Colin McHenry This article is available at Daemen Digital Commons: https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar/52 Herpetology Notes, volume 11: 179-187 (2018) (published online on 20 February 2018) Increasing dietary breadth through allometry: bite forces in sympatric Australian skinks Domenic C. D’Amore1,*, David Meadows1, Simon Clulow2, J. Sean Doody2,3, David Rhind4 and Colin R. McHenry2,5,6 Abstract. Ecomechanical measures of performance such as bite force may function as an indirect measure of niche. This study proposes that allometric changes in performance may contribute to niche separation, especially in a group where the specific mechanism(s) remains unclear. We surveyed the bite force and morphology of 5 wild caught, sympatric skink species in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. Skinks were collected from trapline fences, weighed, photographed, and maximum bite force was measured with a piezoresistive force sensor. Morphological metrics were derived from photographs of the dorsum. Normalized morphological traits indicate interspecific variability in form, particularly in forelimb length, which may be a result of habitat separation. Bite force showed strong, significantly positive, allometric scaling against most morphological traits. Tail length was the only morphological trait that scaled isometrically. Allometric changes in bite force may increase dietary breadth, allowing larger skinks to supplement their diet with larger, more durable prey. This study reveals that ecologically relevant traits may be explained by allometric differences coupled with size variation. Future work should focus on (1) an increase in sample size, (2) long-term measurement of diet selection, and (3) accessibility of prey items to our focal animals. Keywords: Ecomechanics; Morphology; Niche separation; Scincomorpha; Western Australia Introduction Varanidae (Pianka, 1986). Concerning ecomechanical traits (Wainwright, 1991), bite force has received Assessing variation in ecologically relevant traits widespread attention with respect to dietary niche. to better understand niche dates back to Hutchinson Maximum bite force is expected to relate causally to (1959). Since then a multitude of studies have examined food type (D’Amore et al., 2011), maximum size (Wroe niche separation in numerous vertebrate taxa, including et al., 2005), or hardness (McCurry et al., 2015). Studies family level studies such as Anolidae (Schoener, 1970; have looked at how increases in bite force allow species Roughgarden, 1995), Fringillidae (Zeng and Lu, to occupy different, usually durophagous, niches (Mara 2009), Muridae (Millien-Parra and Loreau, 2000), and et al., 2010; Schaerlaeken et al., 2012). Bite force has also been used as a dimension to facilitate niche partitioning between sympatric species (Herrel et al., 2001a; Verwaijen et al., 2002; Measey et al., 2011). Bite force functions as an ideal ecomechanical variable 1 Department of Natural Sciences, Daemen College, 4380 Main to explore concerning systems where the explanations Street, Amherst, NY 14226, USA 2 School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of for niche separation are unresolved. Western Australian Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia skinks (Infraorder Scincomorpha) are an excellent 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of South example of this. Over 420 species of skinks occur in Florida – St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Florida 33705, USA Australia alone (Wilson and Swan, 2013; Cogger, 4 School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 2014). Several skink species often co-occur in their Victoria 3800, Australia respective environments, and one can find up to 40 5 Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash species occurring together in the deserts of Australia University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia 6 School of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, (Pianka, 1969a). Several hypotheses have been put New South Wales 2308, Australia forward to explain how skinks achieve such high levels * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] of sympatric diversity there. Place, food, and time are 180 Domenic C. D’Amore et al. potentially the most substantial niche dimensions, allowing for minimal ecological distances between sympatric species (Pianka, 1969a,b). Others have stated that the nature of spinifex (genus: Triodia) grasslands is ideal for lizards to flourish and diversify (Morton and James, 1988). Skinks are often seen as opportunistic generalists, and any dietary differentiation is often subtle and distinguishable only at the prey’s generic level (James, 1991a). These unspecialized diets, compounded with variable juvenile mortality and reproductive success (James, 1991b; Read, 1998), may reduce niche overlap to the point of eliminating competition. Some argue the food supply may be ‘super abundant’ and eliminate any need for dietary niche separation (Twigg et al., 1996). On the other hand, niche separation may be primarily facilitated by habitat/microhabitat use (often attributed to increased environmental heterogeneity) and variation in peak foraging times (Goodman, 2007; Goodman et al., 2008; Pianka, 1969a; Twigg et al., 1996). Niche separation is often facilitated by divergence in one or more specific, ecologically relevant physical or behavioral trait(s) (Brown and Wilson, 1956; Losos, 2000). It is also possible that consistent allometric growth patterns may achieve a similar end. Size differences within sympatric species could facilitate Figure 1. Phylogeny of skink species captured in this study. disproportionate character changes in a consistent, Branches are scaled based on branch lengths modified from predictable fashion, and these allometric character Pyron et al. (2013). Species include (A) Carlia triacantha, changes would result in niche separation. This has (B) Cryptoblepharus metallicus, (C) Ctenotus inornatus, (D) been seen ontogenetically in a number of species Ctenotus robustus, and (E) Eremiascincus isolepis. Scale = 1 where allometric changes in bite force allow for niche cm. Photos by D. Meadows. transition with age and size (Binder and Valkenburgh, 2000; Erickson et al., 2003; Herrel et al., 2006; Pfaller et al., 2011). The purpose of this study is to determine if changes through allometric change across sympatric species. in body size correlated to bite performance could We surveyed the bite forces of wild caught skinks from function as a mechanism for niche separation within the Kimberley region of Western Australia, along with a sympatric group of vertebrates. We determine if masses and a number of morphological measurements. bite force potentially allows for niche partitioning We hypothesize1 that bite force, when scaled against body size and morphological traits, will display a 1 Table 1. Number of skink individuals that were caught, and those that produced usable bite force data.significant, positively allometric trend. We also provide 2 3 description of skink morphological variability. This pilot 4 study will allow researchers to better test the role of bite 5 Table 1. Number of skink individuals that were caught, and 6 force in niche partitioning within complex multispecific those that produced usable bite force data. 7 communities in the future. 8 Skink species Number caught Number bit Materials and Methods Carlia triacantha 2 2 Cryptoblepharus metallicus 11 8 Location and Measurements.—Fieldwork was Ctenotus robustus 15 12 conducted during June, 2013 at the El Questro Ctenotus inornatus 10 9 Wilderness Park in the East Kimberley region of Eremiascincus isolepis 5 5 Western Australia. A total of 43 individuals of 5 species Increasing dietary breadth through allometry 181 of skink were captured in a two-week period, and 36 direct contact with the center of the transducer during all produced usable bite force data (Table 1). Species trials. Many skinks were eager to bite when approached captured were all members of Lygosominae (Pyron et with the transducer, whereas others were encouraged to al., 2013), comprising of Carlia triacantha (Mitchell, bite with gentle taps on the nose that readily induced 1953), Cryptoblepharus metallicus (Boulenger, 1887), defensive bites. Consecutive attempts were made to Ctenotus inornatus (Gray, 1845), Ctenotus robustus induce a single specimen to bite, until five usable bite (Storr, 1970), and Eremiascincus isolepis (Boulenger, force measures were collected from each. The maximum 1887) (Fig. 1). Skinks were collected from four isolated value out of these was used as BF. trapline fences located throughout