DOCSLIB.ORG

Strona 1 Z 11 Page 1 of 11Wir2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strona 1 Z 11 Page 1 of 11Wir2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII RESULTS BY CATEGORY Nazwa wina Rocznik Kategoria Wynik Winnica Kraj Medal Name of wine Vintage Category Points Wine producer Country Medal Champion Archil’s Wine Rkatsiteli 2015 VI.12 N 92,00 Telavi Old Cellar Georgia Grand Gold Medal Cuvee Blanc Seyval 2019 I.1 90,00 Winnica Saganum Poland Gold Medal Blanc Souvignier Gris Kakhuri Mtsvane 2018 VI.12 N 89,00 Gelovani Georgia Gold Medal Orange Wine 2019 VI.12 N 88,67 Winnica Amelie Poland Gold Medal Fumé Blanc 2017 I.1 88,00 Fautor Winery R. Moldova Gold Medal AnimAliens Feteasca 2019 I.1 88,00 Castel Mimi R. Moldova Gold Medal Alba Muscat Rulandské Šedé Sur Lie 2017 I.1 88,00 Zámocké Vinárstvo Slovakia Gold Medal Viorica 2019 I.1 87,33 Imperial Vin Group R. Moldova Gold Medal Autentic Sauvignon Blanc Migdal – P Chateau 2019 I.1 87,00 R. Moldova Gold Medal IGP Codru Cojusna Novak Alb de Onitcani 2018 I.1 86,67 Novak Winery R. Moldova Gold Medal Rcatiteli Orange Affair Mtsvane 2019 VI.12 N 86,67 Artizani Georgia Gold Medal Rkatsiteli Muškát Moravský 2020 I.1 86,67 Karpatská Perla Slovakia Gold Medal Chora Fiano 2019 I.1 86,67 Tenuta Corallo Italy Gold Medal Moldawska Dolina Chardonnay Feteasca 2019 I.1 86,67 Vinaria Bostavan R. Moldova Gold Medal Alba Bagueri Chardonnay 2016 I.1 86,33 Klet Brda Slovenia Gold Medal Riesling 2019 I.1 86,33 Winnica Saint Vincent Poland Gold Medal Chardonnay IGP 2019 I.1 86,33 Vinia Traian R. Moldova Gold Medal Grüner Veltliner 2019 I.1 86,33 Weingut Tagwerker Austria Gold Medal Muscat Ottonel 2019 I.1 86,33 Winnica Saint Vincent Poland Gold Medal Pinot Grigio de Purcari 2019 I.1 86,33 Vinăria Purcari R. Moldova Gold Medal Viorica PGI Stefan Voda 2019 I.1 86,33 Suvorov-Vin R. Moldova Gold Medal Pinot Gris 2019 I.1 86,33 Karpatská Perla Slovakia Gold Medal Chardonnay Reserva Bio 2019 I.1 86,33 Winnica Jura Poland Gold Medal Trei Fete Feteasca Alba Feteasca Regala 2019 I.1 86,33 Basarabia Lwin R. Moldova Gold Medal Feteasca Neagra Hibernal Authentic 2018 I.1N 86,33 Víno Hruška Czech R. Gold Medal Collection Sauvignon Blanc 2019 I.1 86,33 Javgurvin Grup R. Moldova Gold Medal Strona 1 z 11 Page 1 of 11 WiR2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII RESULTS BY CATEGORY Nazwa wina Rocznik Kategoria Wynik Winnica Kraj Medal Name of wine Vintage Category Points Wine producer Country Medal Castel Mimi Feteasca 2019 I.1 86,00 Castel Mimi R. Moldova Gold Medal Alba Strona 2 z 11 Page 2 of 11 WiR2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII RESULTS BY CATEGORY Nazwa wina Rocznik Kategoria Wynik Winnica Kraj Medal Name of wine Vintage Category Points Wine producer Country Medal Sauvignon 2019 I.1 86,00 Zámocké Vinárstvo Slovakia Gold Medal Chardonnay de Purcari 2019 I.1 86,00 Vinăria Purcari R. Moldova Gold Medal Feteasca Regală 2019 I.1 86,00 Cricova R. Moldova Gold Medal Tokaji Furmint Nr 4 2019 I.1 86,00 Winiarnia Lippoczy Pince Hungary Gold Medal Traminer 2019 I.1 86,00 Winnica Trojan Poland Gold Medal Arom 2018 I.1 86,00 Winnica Golesz Poland Gold Medal H3 Hibernal 2019 I.1 86,00 Winnica Jakubów Poland Gold Medal Johanniter 2019 I.1 86,00 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Gold Medal Timbrus Viorica de 2019 I.1 86,00 Timbrus Purcari Estate R. Moldova Gold Medal Purcari Riesling IGP 2019 I.1 86,00 Vinia Traian R. Moldova Gold Medal Grüner Veltliner 2019 I.1 85,33 Zach Austria Chisinaul Vechi Muscat 2019 I.1 85,33 Alianta-Vin R. Moldova Blanca Cuvée 2019 I.1 85,00 Fautor Winery R. Moldova Pinot Blanc 2019 I.1 85,00 Winnica Ingrid Poland Srebrne Grono 2019 I.1 85,00 Winnica Grono Poland Carpe Diem Femme 2019 I.1 85,00 Vinfoteca & Co R. Moldova Fatale Daos Treasure 2019 I.1 84,67 Vinaria Bostavan R. Moldova Chardonnay Sauvignon Blanc 2019 I.1 84,67 Suvorov-Vin R. Moldova Gelber Muskateller 2019 I.1 84,67 Zach Austria Carpe Diem Feteasca 2019 I.1 84,67 Vinfoteca & Co R. Moldova Regala Carpe Diem Feteasca 2019 I.1 84,67 Vinfoteca & Co R. Moldova Alba Hibernal 2019 I.1 84,33 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Blanc de Noirs Pinot Noir 2019 V.10 84,33 Winnica Ingrid Poland Castel Mimi Viorica de 2019 I.1 84,00 Castel Mimi R. Moldova Bulboaca Limited Edition Złote Grono 2019 I.1 84,00 Winnica Grono Poland Riesling 2018 I.1 84,00 Zach Austria Bagueri Rebula 2017 I.1 83,67 Klet Brda Slovenia Sauvignon Pinot Grigio 7 2019 I.1 83,67 Vinaria din Vale R. Moldova Coline Individo Fetească Regală 2019 I.1 83,67 Chateau Vartely R. Moldova Reisling Queen Celesta XIX 2019 I.1 83,33 Winnica Nobilis Poland Strona 3 z 11 Page 3 of 11 WiR2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII RESULTS BY CATEGORY Nazwa wina Rocznik Kategoria Wynik Winnica Kraj Medal Name of wine Vintage Category Points Wine producer Country Medal Astra Superior 2016 I.1 83,00 Petrény Winery Hungary Cuvee Galicja 2019 I.1 82,33 Fundacja Galicja Vitis Poland Chardonnay 2018 I.1 81,67 Kazayak-Vin R. Moldova Dolina Sammy Winnica Fiesta 2019 I.1 81,00 Poland Jankowice Dolina Sammy Winnica Forest 2019 I.1 81,00 Poland Jankowice Seyval Blanc 2019 I.1 80,67 Fundacja Galicja Vitis Poland Seyval Blanc 2017 I.1 80,67 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Champion LH Traminer 2016 I.3 92,00 Fautor Winery R. Moldova Grand Gold Medal Devin 2019 I.2 90,00 Karpatská Perla Slovakia Gold Medal Hibernal Nobilis 2019 VI.13 89,67 Winnica Saganum Poland Gold Medal Pinot Grigio 2019 I.2 88,33 DK-Intertrade R. Moldova Gold Medal LH Rhein Riesling 2010 I.3 87,67 Fautor Winery R. Moldova Gold Medal Pálava 2019 I.3 87,67 Karpatská Perla Slovakia Gold Medal LH Sauvignon Blanc 2011 I.3 87,33 Fautor Winery R. Moldova Gold Medal Riesling Nobilis 2019 VI.13 87,00 Winnica Saganum Poland Gold Medal Inspiro Muscat Alb 2019 I.2 87,00 Chateau Vartely R. Moldova Gold Medal Muskat 2019 I.3 87,00 Winnica Amelie Poland Gold Medal Solaria 2016 I.2 86,33 Petrény Winery Hungary Gold Medal Riesling de Rhin 2019 I.2 86,33 Milestii Mici R. Moldova Gold Medal Saga 2019 I.3 86,33 Winnica Saganum Poland Gold Medal Solaris 2018 I.3 86,33 Winnica Bachusowe Pole Poland Gold Medal LH Rhein Riesling 2017 I.3 86,33 Fautor Winery R. Moldova Gold Medal Riesling 2018 I.2 86,00 Weingut Tagwerker Austria Gold Medal Hibernal Fresh Collection 2019 I.2 86,00 Víno Hruška Czech R. Gold Medal Tramín 2019 I.2 86,00 Vinný Dům Czech R. Gold Medal Białe Cuvee 2019 I.2 86,00 Winnica Krzemionka Poland Gold Medal Devin Muscat Moravsky 2019 I.3 86,00 Víno Hruška Czech R. Gold Medal Fresh Collection Malverina Organic 2018 I.3 86,00 Víno Hruška Czech R. Gold Medal Collection Hibernal Organic 2019 I.2 85,67 Víno Hruška Czech R. Collection Novak Alb de Onitcani 2019 I.2 85,67 Novak Winery R. Moldova Strona 4 z 11 Page 4 of 11 WiR2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII RESULTS BY CATEGORY Nazwa wina Rocznik Kategoria Wynik Winnica Kraj Medal Name of wine Vintage Category Points Wine producer Country Medal Weingut Werner Cabernet Blanc Trocken 2018 I.2 85,67 Anselmann & Gebrüder Germany Anselmann Sauvignon 2019 I.2 85,33 Vinný Dům Czech R. Gewurztraminer 2019 I.2 85,00 Winnica Saint Vincent Poland Weingut Werner Grauburgunder Trocken 2020 I.2 84,67 Anselmann & Gebrüder Germany Anselmann Polska Jutrzenka 2019 I.2 84,67 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Mr Helidor XIX 2019 I.3 84,67 Winnica Nobilis Poland Ryzlink Rýnský Fresh 2019 I.2 84,33 Víno Hruška Czech R. Collection Muškát Moravský 2019 I.2 84,33 Vinný Dům Czech R. Riesling 2019 I.3 84,33 Winnica Saganum Poland Winnica Rodzinna Cuvee Blanc 2019 I.2 84,00 Poland Cwielong-Olszewski Johanniter 2019 I.2 84,00 Winnica Trojan Poland Sweet Pearl XIX 2019 I.3 84,00 Winnica Nobilis Poland Johanniter 2018 I.3 84,00 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Solaris 2019 I.3 84,00 Winnica Trojan Poland Gelber Muskateller 2019 I.2 83,67 Weingut Tagwerker Austria Pálava 2019 I.3 83,67 Vinný Dům Czech R. Tramin cerveny BV 2018 I.3 83,67 Pivnica Tibava Slovakia Hibernal Późny Zbiór Bio 2019 I.2 83,33 Winnica Jura Poland Sauvignon Top Collection 2019 I.2 83,33 Víno Hruška Czech R. Solaris 2019 I.2 83,33 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Tokaji Furmint Nr 7 2019 I.2 83,00 Winiarnia Lippoczy Pince Hungary Winnica Rodzinna Traminee 2019 I.2 82,00 Poland Cwielong-Olszewski Seyval Blanc 2018 I.2 82,00 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Weingut Werner Scheurebe Feinherb 2020 I.3 82,00 Anselmann & Gebrüder Germany Edesheimer Rosengarten Anselmann Solaris 2018 I.2 81,67 Winnica Tecławska Góra Poland Szykowna Jutrzenka 2019 I.2 81,67 Winnica Szykowna Poland Hibernal Na Osadzie Bio 2018 I.3 N 81,67 Winnica Jura Poland Seyval Blanc 2019 I.3 81,00 Winnica Minoga Pałac Poland Hibernal 2019 I.2 80,33 Vinný Dům Czech R. Strona 5 z 11 Page 5 of 11 WiR2019 WYNIKI WEDŁUG KATEGORII RESULTS BY CATEGORY Nazwa wina Rocznik Kategoria Wynik Winnica Kraj Medal Name of wine Vintage Category Points Wine producer Country Medal Roselit Diva XIX Champion 2019 II.4 87,20 Winnica Nobilis Poland Wytrawne Gold Medal Roselit Diva XIX 2019 II.5 87,00 Winnica Nobilis Poland Gold Medal Półsłodkie Roselit Diva XIX 2018 II.5 86,67 Winnica Nobilis Poland Gold Medal Półwytrawne Winnica Rodzinna Rondorosse 2019 II.5 86,33 Poland Gold Medal Cwielong-Olszewski Rondo Rose 2019 II.5 85,67 Winnica Chodorowa Poland Weingut Werner Cabernet Sauvignon 2020 II.5 85,33 Anselmann & Gebrüder Germany Rose Trocken Anselmann Inspiro Muscat Rose 2019 II.5 85,00 Chateau Vartely R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
    31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Grapes in Missouri
    MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Compounds As Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity
    foods Review Phenolic Compounds as Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity Vakare˙ Merkyte˙ 1,2 , Edoardo Longo 1,2,* , Giulia Windisch 1,2 and Emanuele Boselli 1,2 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 Oenolab, NOI Techpark South Tyrol, Via A. Volta 13B, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0471-017691 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Targeted and untargeted determinations are being currently applied to different classes of natural phenolics to develop an integrated approach aimed at ensuring compliance to regulatory prescriptions related to specific quality parameters of wine production. The regulations are particularly severe for wine and include various aspects of the viticulture practices and winemaking techniques. Nevertheless, the use of phenolic profiles for quality control is still fragmented and incomplete, even if they are a promising tool for quality evaluation. Only a few methods have been already validated and widely applied, and an integrated approach is in fact still missing because of the complex dependence of the chemical profile of wine on many viticultural and enological factors, which have not been clarified yet. For example, there is a lack of studies about the phenolic composition in relation to the wine authenticity of white and especially rosé wines. This review is a bibliographic account on the approaches based on phenolic species that have been developed for the evaluation of wine quality and frauds, from the grape varieties (of V.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S
    HO-88 Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S. Kaan Kurtural and Patsy E. Wilson, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky; Imed E. Dami, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University rapes grown in Kentucky are sub- usually more harmful to grapevines than Even in established fruit growing areas, ject to environmental stresses that steady cool temperatures. temperatures occasionally reach critical reduceG crop yield and quality, and injure Mesoclimate is the climate of the vine- levels and cause significant damage. The and kill grapevines. Damaging critical yard site affected by its local topography. moderate hardiness of grapes increases winter temperatures, late spring frosts, The topography of a given site, including the likelihood for damage since they are short growing seasons, and extreme the absolute elevation, slope, aspect, and the most cold-sensitive of the temperate summer temperatures all occur with soils, will greatly affect the suitability of fruit crops. regularity in regions of Kentucky. How- a proposed site. Mesoclimate is much Freezing injury, or winterkill, oc- ever, despite the challenging climate, smaller in area than macroclimate. curs as a result of permanent parts of certain species and cultivars of grapes Microclimate is the environment the grapevine being damaged by sub- are grown commercially in Kentucky. within and around the canopy of the freezing temperatures. This is different The aim of this bulletin is to describe the grapevine. It is described by the sunlight from spring freeze damage that kills macroclimatic features affecting grape exposure, air temperature, wind speed, emerged shoots and flower buds. Thus, production that should be evaluated in and wetness of leaves and clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles
    CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles MEETING NOTICE The topic for our January meeting is "Chardonel Still Wine Styles". Fifty-nine wineries in Missouri produce wine using the Chardonel grape (1) , making it one of the most popular regional wines. Amateur wine makers in Missouri are fortunate that high quality Chardonel grapes are available from local vineyards. Steve Brunkhorst will lead the meeting, and will share his 2014 vintage Chardonel wines. We will taste his Chardonel produced in glass without flavor or aroma modification, and compare it to the same base wine produced with malolactic fermentation as well the same base wine aged with American oak. We will also taste Chardonel wines from several Missouri wineries. (1) apellationamerica.com CHARDONEL Still Wine Styles Missouri Winemaking Society January 21, 2016 Steve Brunkhorst CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles Chardonel a cross of Seyval x Chardonnay in 1953. Fruit first observed 1958 Original vine propagated in 1960 Distinguished by superior wine quality combined with high productivity Cold hardiness superior to parent Chardonnay The 4th wine grape cultivar to be named by the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Cayuga White (1972) Horizon ( 1983) Melody (1986). SOURCE www.hort.cornell.edu CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles “This hybrid grape is a cross of the famed Chardonnay grape with the popular Seyval Blanc. Chardonel can be fermented in oak or stainless steel barrels, and the grapes produce a dry and full bodied wine. Depending on aging techniques, this hybrid may exude notes
    [Show full text]
  • Champagne: the Bubble Capital of the Wine World
    T O O RDER M ORE F EA T URED W INES C ALL 1-800-823-5527 T ODAY ! Volume 19 Number 2 ©Vinesse Wine Club 2011 The SKU 17196 GrThe Officiala NewslepTTer fOrevine ViiNesse wiiNe club MeMbers Champagne: The Bubble Capital of the Wine World Getaway: Celebrating Solvang’s Centennial The Shawnee Hills Wine Trail: Unexpected Delights Chardonnay-Friendly Portabella Burgers Wine Buzz: Chelsea’s Wedding Wines & More G E T Y OUR D AILY D OSE O F W INE N E W S A T www .V INESSE T ODAY . C O M 2 • The Grapevine • Visit vinesse.com OUR MISSION: To uncover and bring you wine gems diTOr s OurNal from around the world, which you’re e ’ J not likely to discover on your own, and which enhance your wine enjoyment. What Are Friends For? YOUR GRAPEVINE TEAM: Intrepid Wine Enthusiast, Chief How to Create a Wine Lover Taster and Winehound: Martin Stewart By Robert Johnson Chief Operating Officer something a bit more complex, a good (aka “The Buck Stops Here”): t’s a topic that never Lawrence D. Dutra I gets old, even if the “starter wine” would be an off-dry (or semi-sweet) Riesling. Editor: writer addressing it Robert Johnson does: how to transform Once they can identify some of the flavors of the Riesling variety, move Wine Steward: someone who doesn’t Katie Montgomery drink much wine into a on to a completely dry rendition. This will help them understand that a wine The Grapevine is published by Vinesse, wine lover.
    [Show full text]
  • Cdi 8/1/2021
    - CDI AMENDED PRICING FOR 8/1/2021 Amended Prices for the Month of August 2021 Name of Licensee: Date:07/15/2021 Initial Filing Amending To Notes1 Item # Item Bottle Case Resale Bott PO Case PO Amending To Bottle Case Resale Bott PO Case PO 9024256 ABSOLUT VDK 80 24B 200ML 7.21 331.68 9.29 18.24 18.24 HARTLEY & PARKER 6.99 331.68 9.29 28.80 18.24 9024273 ABSOLUT VDK CITRON 24B 200ML 7.21 331.68 9.29 18.24 18.24 HARTLEY & PARKER 6.99 331.68 9.29 28.80 18.24 9365820 ABSOLUT VDK JUICE APL 70 6B 750ML 15.99 190.80 25.99 60.00 60.00 HARTLEY & PARKER 15.98 190.80 26.69 60.00 60.00 9417204 ABSOLUT VDK JUICE PEAR ELD 70 6B 750ML 15.99 190.80 25.99 60.00 60.00 HARTLEY & PARKER 15.98 190.80 26.99 60.00 60.00 9024282 ABSOLUT VDK MANDRIN 24B 200ML 7.21 331.68 9.29 18.24 18.24 HARTLEY & PARKER 6.99 331.68 9.29 28.80 18.24 9006515 ANTIOQUEN O AGUARDIEN TE 375ML 9.49 225.84 11.99 BARTON BRESCOME 7.59 179.34 9.89 9.60 9.60 9006514 ANTIOQUEN O AGUARDIEN TE 750ML 17.49 166.92 22.99 HARTLEY & PARKER 15.99 190.92 22.99 24.00 24.00 9006513 ANTIOQUENO AGUARDIENTE 1L Ammended manually HARTLEY & PARKER 17.99 190.92 26.99 42.00 66.00 keep our case 9448162 BACARDI RUM GLD 24B 200ML 4.10 176.77 5.99 23.66 23.66 BARTON BRESCOME 4.09 176.77 5.99 23.66 23.66 40261 BACARDI RUM GLD 375ML 6.09 138.06 7.99 25.10 25.10 EDER BROTHERS 6.06 138.06 7.99 25.10 25.10 41178 BACARDI RUM LIMON 24B 200ML 4.10 176.77 6.49 23.66 23.66 BARTON BRESCOME 4.09 176.77 5.99 23.66 23.66 9448163 BACARDI RUM SUPERIOR 24B 200ML 4.10 176.77 5.99 23.66 23.66 BARTON BRESCOME 4.09 176.77 5.99 23.66 23.66 40162 BACARDI RUM SUPERIOR FLK 375ML 6.09 138.06 7.99 25.10 25.10 EDER BROTHERS 6.06 138.06 7.99 25.10 25.10 153445 BALLANTINE S SCOTCH FINEST 750ML 19.30 229.15 24.39 ALLAN S.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec's Winegrowing Bioclimatology
    Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology Trevor James Smith A thesis In the Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) Concordia University Montréal, Québec Canada 24 February 2017 © 2017, Trevor James Smith, Some Rights Reserved Creative Commons 4.0 International BY-NC License (see Annex 6) CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared by Trevor James Smith Entitled Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: ____________________________________________________ Chair Dr. Norma Rantisi _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Norman K. Jones _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Philippe Roy ________________________________________________Supervisor Dr. H. Damon Matthews Approved by ___________________________________________ Chair of Department ___________________________________________ Dean of Faculty of Arts and Science On ___________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Canada Province-Level Wine Landscapes
    WINE INTELLIGENCE CANADA PROVINCE-LEVEL WINE LANDSCAPES 2020 FEBRUARY 2020 1 Copyright © Wine Intelligence 2020 • All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means) without the permission of the copyright owners. Application for permission should be addressed to Wine Intelligence. • The source of all information in this publication is Wine Intelligence unless otherwise stated. • Wine Intelligence shall not be liable for any damages (including without limitation, damages for loss of business or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from this publication or any information contained in it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of reading this publication. • Please refer to the Wine Intelligence Terms and Conditions for Syndicated Research Reports for details about the licensing of this report, and the use to which it can be put by licencees. • Wine Intelligence Ltd: 109 Maltings Place, 169 Tower Bridge Road, London SE1 3LJ Tel: 020 73781277. E-mail: [email protected]. Registered in England as a limited company number: 4375306 2 CONTENTS ▪ How to read this report p. 5 ▪ Management summary p. 7 ▪ Wine market provinces: key differences p. 21 ▪ Ontario p. 32 ▪ Alberta p. 42 ▪ British Colombia p. 52 ▪ Québec p. 62 ▪ Manitoba p. 72 ▪ Nova Scotia p. 82 ▪ Appendix p. 92 ▪ Methodology p. 100 3 CONTENTS ▪ How to read this report p. 5 ▪ Management summary p. 7 ▪ Wine market provinces: key differences p. 21 ▪ Ontario p. 32 ▪ Alberta p. 42 ▪ British Colombia p. 52 ▪ Québec p.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword
    2 014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Arkansas Spray Guide University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service AG1281 Illinois University of Illinois Extension ICSG3-14 Indiana Purdue Extension ID-169 Iowa Iowa State University Extension and Outreach PM 1375 Kansas K-State Research and Extension Kentucky University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-94 Missouri University of Missouri Missouri State University MX377 Nebraska University of Nebraska — Lincoln Extension Ohio Ohio State University Extension 506B2 Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service E-987 West Virginia West Virginia University Extension Service Publication 865 Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension A3899 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................6 Tips on Using This Spray Guide .................................................................................................13 Grape Spray Schedule .................................................................................................................15 Blueberry Spray Schedule ...........................................................................................................37 Raspberry and Blackberry Spray Schedule .................................................................................42 Strawberry Spray Schedule .........................................................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Characteristics of Wine Made by Disease Tolerant Varieties
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI UDINE in agreement with FONDAZIONE EDMUND MACH PhD School in Agricultural Science and Biotechnology Cycle XXX Doctoral Thesis Chemical characteristics of wine made by disease tolerant varieties PhD Candidate Supervisor Silvia Ruocco Dr. Urska Vrhovsek Co-Supervisor Prof. Doris Rauhut DEFENCE YEAR 2018 To the best gift that life gave us: to you Nonna Rosa CONTENTS Abstract 1 Aim of the PhD project 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Preface to Chapter 2 17 Chapter 2 The metabolomic profile of red non-V. vinifera genotypes 19 Preface to Chapter 3 and 4 50 Chapter 3 Study of the composition of grape from disease tolerant varieties 56 Chapter 4 Investigation of volatile and non-volatile compounds of wine 79 produced by disease tolerant varieties Concluding remarks 140 Summary of PhD experiences 141 Acknowledgements 142 Abstract Vitis vinifera L. is the most widely cultivated Vitis species around the world which includes a great number of cultivars. Owing to the superior quality of their grapes, these cultivars were long considered the only suitable for the production of high quality wines. However, the lack of resistance genes to fungal diseases like powdery and downy mildew (Uncinula necator and Plasmopara viticola) makes it necessary the application of huge amounts of chemical products in vineyard. Thus, the search for alternative and more sustainable methods to control the major grapevine pathogens have increased the interest in new disease tolerant varieties. Chemical characterisation of these varieties is an important prerequisite to evaluate and promote their use on the global wine market. The aim of this project was to produce a comprehensive study of some promising new disease tolerant varieties recently introduced to the cultivation by identifying the peculiar aspects of their composition and measuring their positive and negative quality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Pacific Rim Wine Competition San Bernadino, CA April 17, 2019
    2019 Pacific Rim Wine Competition San Bernadino, CA April 17, 2019 Albarino 2017 Miramonte Winery Albarino Temecula Valley Silver 2018 Wedding Oak Winery Albarino Texas Hill Country Silver American Hybrid (Specify Varietals) NV Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery St. Vincent Rose Kansas Silver American Hybrid, Specify Varietals 2017 Goose Watch Winery Traminette Finger Lakes Gold 2017 Fireside Winery Iowa Silver NV Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery Valvin Muscat Kansas Silver NV Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery Melody Kansas Silver 2017 Thirsty Owl Wine Company Traminette Finger Lakes Silver 2017 Thirsty Owl Wine Company Snow Owl Finger Lakes Silver Angelica NV Hart Winery Angelica Temecula Valley Gold Apple 2017 Two K Farms Cidery and Winery Collonade Leelanau Peninsula Estate Grown, Produced Apple Wine Silver and Bottled Barbera 2017 Jeff Runquist Reserve Barbera Amador County, Sierra Foothills Double Gold 2017 Jeff Runquist Reserve Barbera Amador County, Sierra Foothills Best of Class 2017 Jeff Runquist Barbera Amador County, Sierra Foothills Gold 2017 Jeff Runquist Barbera Cooper Amador County, Sierra Foothills Cooper Vineyard Silver Blueberry Blush NV 21 Brix Winery Thirsty Elephant Lake Erie Gold 2018 Blackbird Vineyards Arriviste Rosé Napa Gold NV Sutter Home Pink Moscato California Gold Brut 2017 Saint Hilaire Saint Hilaire Blanquette Brut Blanquette de Limoux AOC Brut Double Gold NV Barefoot Bubbly Brut Cuvee California Silver NV Grand Cuvee 1531 Grand Cuvee 1531 Brut Cremant de Limoux AOC White Silver 2019 Pacific Rim Wine Competition San Bernadino,
    [Show full text]