Conference Program (Pdf)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conference Program (Pdf) Cover image: This mosaic comprises four individual NAVCAM images taken from 31.8 km from the center of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 4 November 2014. The image resolution is 2.7 m/pixel and thus each original 1024 x 1024 pixel frame measured 2.8 km across. The mosaic has been slightly rotated and cropped, and measures roughly 4.6 x 3.8 km. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license. The user is allowed to reproduce, distribute, adapt, translate and publicly perform this publication, without explicit permission, provided that the content is accompanied by an acknowledgement that the source is credited as 'European Space Agency – ESA', a direct link to the license text is provided and that it is clearly indicated if changes were made to the original content. Adaptation/translation/derivatives must be distributed under the same license terms as this publication. To view a copy of this license, please visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- sa/3.0/igo/ Credit: ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM Table of Contents Registration ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Schedule of Events .......................................................................................................................... 6 Williamsburg Lodge Conference Center Main Level ................................................................... 20 Williamsburg Lodge Conference Center Lower Level ................................................................. 21 Special Events ............................................................................................................................... 22 Early Bird Reception................................................................................................................. 22 Award Ceremony, Dirk Brouwer Award Lecture, and Reception ............................................ 22 Dirk Brouwer Award Honoree.................................................................................................. 22 Conference Location ..................................................................................................................... 22 Williamsburg Lodge Accommodations ........................................................................................ 22 Transportation Info ....................................................................................................................... 23 Airport Shuttle Services ................................................................................................................ 23 Directions ...................................................................................................................................... 24 Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport ................................................................. 24 Richmond International Airport ................................................................................................ 24 Norfolk International Airport .................................................................................................... 24 Reagan National Airport ........................................................................................................... 25 Dulles International Airport ...................................................................................................... 25 Baltimore Washington International ......................................................................................... 26 Explore Williamsburg ................................................................................................................... 26 Restaurants, Museums, Shopping, and Activities ......................................................................... 26 Additional Information ................................................................................................................. 26 Speaker Orientation .................................................................................................................. 26 Volunteers ................................................................................................................................. 26 Presentations ............................................................................................................................. 26 Preprinted Manuscripts ............................................................................................................. 27 Conference Proceedings............................................................................................................ 27 Committee Meetings ................................................................................................................. 28 Subcommittee Meetings............................................................................................................ 28 Session 1: Space Situational Awareness I .................................................................................... 29 Session 2: Rendezvous and Proximity Operations ....................................................................... 31 Session 3: Dynamical Systems & Trajectory Design ................................................................... 34 Session 4: Orbital Dynamics and Estimation................................................................................ 37 25th AAS / AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting Page 3 Session 5: Launch and Reentry Operations .................................................................................. 40 Session 6: Spacecraft Formation Flight ........................................................................................ 43 Session 7: Trajectory Design ........................................................................................................ 46 Session 8: Asteroid and Cometary Missions ................................................................................ 49 Session 9: Orbit Determination I .................................................................................................. 52 Session 10: Attitude Determination and Sensors .......................................................................... 55 Session 11: Low-Thrust Trajectory Design .................................................................................. 58 Session 12: Orbital Debris ............................................................................................................ 61 Session 13: Space Situational Awareness II ................................................................................. 64 Session 14: Astrodynamics Innovation and Data Sharing ............................................................ 67 Session 15: Trajectory Optimization ............................................................................................ 69 Session 16: Small Body Proximity Operations ............................................................................. 72 Session 24: Flight Mechanics Aspects of the LADEE Mission ................................................... 75 Session 18: Spacecraft Guidance and Control .............................................................................. 78 Session 19: Satellite Constellations .............................................................................................. 81 Session 20: Astrodynamics Techniques........................................................................................ 83 Session 21: Cubesat & Nanosat Missions ..................................................................................... 86 Session 22: Spacecraft Dynamics and Autonomy ........................................................................ 88 Session 23: Orbit Determination II ............................................................................................... 91 Session 17: Relative Motion ......................................................................................................... 94 Session 25: Orbital Dynamics ....................................................................................................... 97 Session 26: Attitude Dynamics and Control ............................................................................... 100 Session 27: Orbit Determination III ............................................................................................ 103 Session 28: Dynamics and control of large space structures & tethers ...................................... 106 Author Index ............................................................................................................................... 108 Page 4 25th AAS / AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting 20TH AAS/AIAA SPACE FLIGHT MECHANICS MEETING CONFERENCE INFORMATION REGISTRATION Registration Site (https://www.xcdsystem.com/aas/) In order to encourage early registration, we have implemented the following conference registration rate structure: Register by 21 Dec 2014 and save $75! Category Early Registration Registration (through 21 Dec 2014) (after 21 Dec 2014) Full - AAS or AIAA Member $465 $540 Full - Non-member $565 $640 Retired $125 $150 Student $125 $150 The receptions are included for all registrants. On-site packet pick up and registration will be available on the following schedule: Sunday Jan. 11 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM Monday Jan. 12 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM Tuesday Jan. 13 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM Wednesday Jan. 14 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM Thursday Jan. 15 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM We will accept registration
Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 13, EGU2011-5107-2, 2011 EGU General Assembly 2011 © Author(s) 2011 NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Richard Elphic (1), Gregory Delory (1,2), Anthony Colaprete (1), Mihaly Horanyi (3), Paul Mahaffy (4), Butler Hine (1), Steven McClard (5), Joan Salute (6), Edwin Grayzeck (6), and Don Boroson (7) (1) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA USA ([email protected]), (2) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA, (3) Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA, (4) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD USA, (5) LunarQuest Program Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL USA, (6) Planetary Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA, Washington, DC USA, (7) Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington MA USA Nearly 40 years have passed since the last Apollo missions investigated the mysteries of the lunar atmosphere and the question of levitated lunar dust. The most important questions remain: what is the composition, structure and variability of the tenuous lunar exosphere? What are its origins, transport mechanisms, and loss processes? Is lofted lunar dust the cause of the horizon glow observed by the Surveyor missions and Apollo astronauts? How does such levitated dust arise and move, what is its density, and what is its ultimate fate? The US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council decadal surveys and the recent “Scientific Context for Exploration of the Moon” (SCEM) reports have identified studies of the pristine state of the lunar atmosphere and dust environment as among the leading priorities for future lunar science missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comet Lemmon, Now in STEREO 25 April 2013, by David Dickinson
    Comet Lemmon, Now in STEREO 25 April 2013, by David Dickinson heads northward through the constellation Pisces. NASA's twin Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft often catch sungrazing comets as they observe the Sun. Known as STEREO A (Ahead) & STEREO B (Behind), these observatories are positioned in Earth leading and trailing orbits. This provides researchers with full 360 degree coverage of the Sun. Launched in 2006, STEREO also gives us a unique perspective to spy incoming sungrazing comets. Recently, STEREO also caught Comet 2011 L4 PanSTARRS and the Earth as the pair slid into view. Another solar observing spacecraft, the European Space Agencies' SOlar Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) has been a prolific comet discoverer. Amateur comet sleuths often catch new Kreutz group sungrazers in the act. Thus far, SOHO has Animation of Comet 2012 F6 Lemmon as seen from discovered over 2400 comets since its launch in NASA’s STEREO Ahead spacecraft. Credit: 1995. SOHO won't see PanSTARRS or Lemmon in NASA/GSFC; animation created by Robert Kaufman its LASCO C3 camera but will catch a glimpse of Comet 2012 S1 ISON as it nears the Sun late this coming November. An icy interloper was in the sights of a NASA Like SOHO and NASA's Solar Dynamics spacecraft this past weekend. Comet 2012 F6 Observatory, data from the twin STEREO Lemmon passed through the field of view of spacecraft is available for daily perusal on their NASA's HI2A camera as seen from its solar website. We first saw this past weekend's observing STEREO Ahead spacecraft. As seen in animation of Comet Lemmon passing through the animation above put together by Robert STEREO's field of view on the Yahoo Kaufman, Comet Lemmon is now displaying a fine STEREOHunters message board.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014
    Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) LADEE PDS Mission Description th May 13 , 2014 Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration i Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 This document is approved in accordance with LADEE Configuration Management Plan, C04.LADEE.CM, paragraph 3.6.1.1 Document Release Routing Approval Process. Page three of this document contains the approved routed release of this document. Approval Signatures _______________________________________ ___________ Butler Hine Date LADEE Project Manager _______________________________________ ___________ Gregory T. Delory Date LADEE Deputy Project Scientist _______________________________________ ___________ Date _______________________________________ ___________ Date ii Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 This page is reserved for routing approval document iii Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 REVISION HISTORY Rev. Description of Change Author(s) Effective Date 1.0 Initial draft G. Delory Nov 1, 2012 1.1 Resolved several TBDs G. Delory Nov 29, 2012 Updated TOC and prepared for conversion to PDF March 21, 1.2 G. Delory 2012 Baseline March 21, NC G. Delory 2012 Edited mission objective #2 as per PDS peer review 1.3 G. Delory April 4, 2013 results Updated mission timeline and orbit plots to reflect as- 1.4 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Langley Research Center 2012
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER 2012 www.nasa.gov An Orion crew capsule test article moments before it is dropped into a An Atlantis flag flew outside Langley’s water basin at Langley to simulate an ocean splashdown. headquarters building during NASA’s final space shuttle mission in July. Launching a New Era of Exploration Welcome to Langley NASA Langley had a banner year in 2012 as we helped propel the nation toward a new age of air and space. From delivering on missions to creating new technologies and knowledge for space, aviation and science, Langley continued the rich tradition of innovation begun 95 years ago. Langley is providing leading-edge research and game-changing technology innovations for human space exploration. We are testing prototype articles of the Orion crew vehicle to optimize designs and improve landing systems for increased crew survivability. Langley has had a role in private-industry space exploration through agreements with SpaceX, Sierra Nevada Corp. and Boeing to provide engineering expertise, conduct testing and support research. Aerospace and Science With the rest of the world, we held our breath as the Curiosity rover landed on Mars – with Langley’s help. The Langley team performed millions of simulations of the entry, descent and landing phase of the Mars Science Laboratory mission to enable a perfect landing, Langley Center Director Lesa Roe and Mark Sirangelo, corporate and for the first time made temperature and pressure vice president and head of Sierra Nevada Space Systems, with measurements as the spacecraft descended, providing the Dream Chaser Space System model.
    [Show full text]
  • HOGAN-THESIS-2019.Pdf (2.824Mb)
    EVALUATION OF FLIGHT CONTROL TECHNIQUES USING VIRTUAL REALITY IN AN ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY ROTATING ENVIRONMENT A Thesis by ROBERT DALLAS HOGAN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Gregory Chamitoff Committee Members, Nancy Currie-Gregg Kristi Shryock Head of Department, Rodney Bowersox August 2019 Major Subject: Aerospace Engineering Copyright 2019 Robert Dallas Hogan ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to develop a collaborative virtual reality (VR) engineering platform for space system and mission design and to demonstrate its utility in the context of evaluating human interfaces for future control systems. Much of the work for this project was the development of the platform itself (called SpaceCRAFT). Additionally, a user study was done with 33 subjects to examine the potential advantages of designing and testing systems in virtual environments that otherwise may be difficult to replicate on Earth. The task evaluated was flying a drone in a rotating artificial gravity environment, which involves numerous unfamiliar forces. Different control strategies were tested using VR in comparison to flat screen interfaces. This particular challenge was chosen to emphasize the difference between immersive and non-immersive environments, and the results demonstrate that VR is a promising tool for human-interface system design and evaluation. The 50-meter radius space station simulated an open-air, long-term habitable environment and was designed with considerations of human factors for rotating reference frames. A quadrotor control model was developed and simulated a variety of stabilization and sensitivity modes.
    [Show full text]
  • PSAD-81-2 Support Service Contracting at Johnson Space
    BY THEU.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTli’JG OFFICE Report To The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space Administration S@pportService Contracting At Johnson Space Center Needs Strengthening T National Aeronautics and S ace Administration Sl about $175 million annual Py on support service Cl at Johnson Space Center. GAO tested the way si of these contracts are administered and found --a contractor was working without approved llllllllllllllll113606 work orders, --Government-furnished equipment was unac- counted for, --questionable reimbursements occurred for con- tractor costs, I --contract funds increased before the need was justified, I --contracting officers were unaware of their re- sponsibilitres and unfamiliar with contract terms, and I --some contracting officers had a general attitude that small dollar value contracts are not worthy of adequate attention. I ‘/A0 believes overreliance on cost-type contracts which quire greater administration efforts than fixed-price )ntracts contributes to these contracting weaknesses recommends that the National Aeronautics and ace Administration take corrective actions. mp81s2 OCTOBER 21,1900 + Request for copies of GAO reports should be sent to: U.S. General Accounting Office Document Handling and Information Services Facility P.O. Box 6015 Gaithersburg, Md. 20760 Telephone (202) 275-6241 The first five copies of individual reports are free of charge. Additional copies of bound audit reports are $3.25 each. Additional copies of unbound report (i.e., letter reports) and most other publications are $1.00 each. There will be a 25% discount on all orders for 100 or more copies mailed to a single address. Sales orders must be prepaid on a cash, check, or money order basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Trajectories in a Sun, Earth, and Moon Ephemeris Model
    SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORIES IN A SUN, EARTH, AND MOON EPHEMERIS MODEL A Project Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering by Romalyn Mirador i ABSTRACT SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORIES IN A SUN, EARTH, AND MOON EPHEMERIS MODEL by Romalyn Mirador This project details the process of building, testing, and comparing a tool to simulate spacecraft trajectories using an ephemeris N-Body model. Different trajectory models and methods of solving are reviewed. Using the Ephemeris positions of the Earth, Moon and Sun, a code for higher-fidelity numerical modeling is built and tested using MATLAB. Resulting trajectories are compared to NASA’s GMAT for accuracy. Results reveal that the N-Body model can be used to find complex trajectories but would need to include other perturbations like gravity harmonics to model more accurate trajectories. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my family and friends for their continuous encouragement and support throughout all these years. A special thank you to my advisor, Dr. Capdevila, and my friend, Dhathri, for mentoring me as I work on this project. The knowledge and guidance from the both of you has helped me tremendously and I appreciate everything you both have done to help me get here. ii Table of Contents List of Symbols ............................................................................................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Rideshare and the Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle: the Key to Low-Cost Lagrange-Point Missions
    SSC15-II-5 Rideshare and the Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle: the Key to Low-cost Lagrange-point Missions Chris Pearson, Marissa Stender, Christopher Loghry, Joe Maly, Valentin Ivanitski Moog Integrated Systems 1113 Washington Avenue, Suite 300, Golden, CO, 80401; 303 216 9777, extension 204 [email protected] Mina Cappuccio, Darin Foreman, Ken Galal, David Mauro NASA Ames Research Center PO Box 1000, M/S 213-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000; 650 604 1313 [email protected] Keats Wilkie, Paul Speth, Trevor Jackson, Will Scott NASA Langley Research Center 4 West Taylor Street, Mail Stop 230, Hampton, VA, 23681; 757 864 420 [email protected] ABSTRACT Rideshare is a well proven approach, in both LEO and GEO, enabling low-cost space access through splitting of launch charges between multiple passengers. Demand exists from users to operate payloads at Lagrange points, but a lack of regular rides results in a deficiency in rideshare opportunities. As a result, such mission architectures currently rely on a costly dedicated launch. NASA and Moog have jointly studied the technical feasibility, risk and cost of using an Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle (OMV) to offer Lagrange point rideshare opportunities. This OMV would be launched as a secondary passenger on a commercial rocket into Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO) and utilize the Moog ESPA secondary launch adapter. The OMV is effectively a free flying spacecraft comprising a full suite of avionics and a propulsion system capable of performing GTO to Lagrange point transfer via a weak stability boundary orbit. In addition to traditional OMV ’tug’ functionality, scenarios using the OMV to host payloads for operation at the Lagrange points have also been analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Lunar Propellant Architecture a Collaborative Study of Lunar Propellant Production
    Commercial Lunar Propellant Architecture A Collaborative Study of Lunar Propellant Production 1 To the Memory of: Dr. Paul D. Spudis (1952–2018) Dr. Spudis earned his master’s degree from Brown University and his Ph.D. from Arizona State University in Geology with a focus on the Moon. His career included work at the US Geological Survey, NASA, John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, and the Lunar and Planetary Institute advocating for the exploration and the utilization of lunar resources. His work will continue to inspire and guide us all on our journey to the Moon. “By going to the Moon we can learn how to extract what we need in space from what we find in space. Fundamentally that is a skill that any spacefaring civilization has to master. If you can learn to do that, you’ve got a skill that will allow you to go to Mars and beyond.” ii Authors David Kornuta, United Launch Alliance, CisLunar Project Lead1 Angel Abbud-Madrid, Colorado School of Mines, Professor of Space Resources Jared Atkinson, Honeybee Robotics, Senior Geophysical Engineer Jonathan Barr, United Launch Alliance, Program Manager Gary Barnhard, Xtraordinary Innovative Space Partnership, CEO Dallas Bienhoff, Cislunar Space Development Company LLC, Founder Brad Blair, NewSpace Analytics, Managing Partner Vanessa Clark, Atomos Nuclear and Space, Chief Executive and Technology Officer Justin Cyrus, Lunar Outpost, CEO Blair DeWitt, Lunar Station Corporation, CEO and Co-Founder Chris Dreyer, Colorado School of Mines, Professor of Space Resources Barry Finger, Paragon
    [Show full text]
  • Cal Poly Alum Gregory Chamitoff Scheduled to Reside on International Space Station in April
    Cal Poly Alumnus Headed for Space Station Mission http://www.calpolynews.calpoly.edu/news_releases/2008/January/ch... Skip to Content Search Cal Poly News News C a l i f o rn i a P o l y t e c h n i c S t a t e U n i v e rs i t y January 16, 2008 MEDIA ADVISORY Contact for media only: Amy Hewes 805-756-6402 [email protected] Cal Poly Alum Gregory Chamitoff Scheduled to Reside On International Space Station in April SAN LUIS OBISPO -- Cal Poly Alum Gregory Chamitoff will soon have quite a view out of the closest window. The 1984 Electrical Engineering graduate has been selected to work and live onboard the International Space Station, another remarkable step in what has proven to be an incredible professional career. Chamitoff will begin his journey in late April on Space Shuttle mission STS-124. He will stay on the ISS until September, returning back to earth with Shuttle mission STS-126. As an undergraduate student at Cal Poly, Chamitoff taught lab courses in circuit design and worked summer internships at Atari Computers and IBM. Chamitoff fondly remembers Cal Poly Mathematics Professor James Mueller, who he contacted recently about his upcoming Space Station trip. From Cal Poly, Chamitoff went on to earn master’s degrees from the California Institute of Technology and the University of Houston Clear Lake, and his Ph.D. in aeronautics and astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. While at MIT, Chamitoff worked on the Hubble Space Telescope, flight control upgrades for the Space Shuttle autopilot and the altitude control system for the Space Station.
    [Show full text]