A Guide to the Bedrock Geology of Range Creek Canyon, Book Cliffs, Utah
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Richard Dallin Westwood: Sheriff and Ferryman of Early Grand County
Richard Dallin Westwood: Sheriff and Ferryman of Early Grand County BY JEAN M. WESTWOOD ON FEBRUARY I7, I889, RICHARD DALLIN WESTWOOD, twenty-six years old, left Mount Pleasant, Utah, bound for Moab, a settlement in the far eastern edge of what was then Emery County. He was looking for a piece of farm land on which he could build a home for himself, his young wife, Martha, and their baby daughter, Mary Ellen. It was just ten years since the first permanent settlers had moved into "Spanish Valley" by the Grand (Colorado) River in the southeast part of the territory. The valley had long been part of western history. Mrs. Westwood lives in Scottsdale, Arizona. Above: Richard Dallin Westwood, ca. 1888. All photographs accompanying this article are courtesy of the author. Richard Dallin Westwood 67 Indian "writings" are still found on the rocks. Manos, metates, arrow heads, stone weapons, and ancient bean, maize, and squash seeds have all been frequent finds throughout the area, attesting to early Indian cultures. The Spanish Trail through here was used first by the early Span iards as a route from New Mexico to California.^ Later it was used in part by Mexican traders, trappers, prospectors, and various Indian tribes. The first party traveling the entire trail apparently was led by WiUiam WolfskiU and George C. Young in the winter of 1830-31.2 In 1854 Brigham Young sent a small expedition under William D. Huntington to trade with the Navajos and explore the southern part of Utah territory. They used this route. The next year Young called forty- one men under Alfred N. -
High-Resolution Correlation of the Upper Cretaceous Stratigraphy Between the Book Cliffs and the Western Henry Mountains Syncline, Utah, U.S.A
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Sciences 5-2012 HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH, U.S.A. Drew L. Seymour University of Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss Part of the Geology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Seymour, Drew L., "HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH, U.S.A." (2012). Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 88. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss/88 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH, U.S.A. By Drew L. Seymour A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For Degree of Master of Science Major: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Christopher R. Fielding Lincoln, NE May, 2012 HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH. U.S.A. Drew L. Seymour, M.S. -
Book Cliffs the Book Cliffs Rise As If Startled out of the Mancos Shale Desert
!People of the Book Cliffs The Book Cliffs rise as if startled out of the Mancos Shale desert. This bright edge stretches east-west, two hundred miles between Grand Junction, Colorado and Price, Utah, stair-stepping four thousand feet up from the desert to a summit that’s cloaked in aspen, fir, and spruce. Erosion has dissected the cliffs into isolated canyons, carved by intermittent streams that all flow south toward the Colorado River. Even so, the cliffs and canyons are considered part of the !Uinta Basin because their rock layers, like the Green River Formation, are tilted north. Pockets of true wilderness still exist within the Book Cliffs. Black bear, bighorn, mule deer, and cougars are at home in these canyons. People have lived in and moved through this country for thousands of years−the Utes most recently, the Fremont before them, and the enigmatic Barrier !Canyon people with their alien pictographs staring at us as if from outer space. Wolf Bennett and his daughters came here from Colorado to see the pictographs and to clamber around the rocks of Sego Canyon. Wolf’s spent his life as a guide and values what these canyons !offer his family−opportunities to discover, a diversion from cityscapes, a sense of wonder. A mile down canyon, Bob Holloway and his two adopted children were watering fruit trees at the ranch he’d recently bought. The roof needed work. Bob and his wife wanted to get out of the rat race in Green River. That town’s population of 900 might swell if a proposed oil refinery and nuclear power plant are built. -
BISON HERD UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Book Cliffs, Bitter Creek and Little Creek Herd Unit #10A and #10C Wildlife Board Approval November 29, 2007
1 BISON HERD UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Book Cliffs, Bitter Creek And Little Creek Herd Unit #10A AND #10C Wildlife Board Approval November 29, 2007 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Uintah and Grand counties - Boundary begins at the Utah-Colorado state line and the White River, south along this state line to the summit and north-south drainage divide of the Book Cliffs; west along this summit and drainage divide to the Uintah-Ouray Indian Reservation boundary; north along this boundary to the Uintah-Grand County line; west along this county line to the Green River; north along this river to the White River; east along this river to the Utah-Colorado state line. NORTH BOOK CLIFFS LAND OWNERSHIP RANGE AREA AND APPROXIMATE OWNERSHIP Bitter Creek Little Creek Combined North Subunit Subunit Subunits Ownership Area % Area % Area (acres) % (acres) (acres) BLM 644,446 45.6 2,389 4.1 646,835 44 SITLA 165,599 11.7 48,912 84.4 214,911 15 DWR 15,138 1.1 6,551 11.3 21,689 1 PRIVATE 70,091 5.0 0 0 70,091 5 UTE TRIBE TRUST 517,506 36.6 82 0.2 517,588 35 LAND TOTAL 1,412,740 100 57,934 100 1,471,114 100 BOOK CLIFFS BISON HISTORY AND STATUS Bison were historically present in the general East Tavaputs Plateau and Uintah Basin. The Escalante expedition reported killing a bison near the present site of Jensen, Utah in September 1776. Bison are also commonly depicted in Native American rock art and pictographs found throughout the area. -
DAR-Colorado-Marker-Book.Pdf
When Ms. Charlotte McKean Hubbs became Colorado State Regent, 2009-2011, she asked that I update "A Guidebook to DAR Historic Markers in Colorado" by Hildegarde and Frank McLaughlin. This publication was revised and updated as a State Regent's project during Mrs. Donald K. Andersen, Colorado State Regent 1989-1991 from the original 1978 version of Colorado Historical Markers. Purpose of this Project was to update information and add new markers since the last publication and add the Santa Fe Trail Markers in Colorado by Mary B. and Leo E. Gamble to this publication. Assessment Forms were sent to each Chapter Historian to complete on their Chapter markers. These assessments will be used to document the condition of each site. GPS (Lat/Long) co-ordinances were to be included for future interactive mapping. Current digital photographs of markers were included where chapters participated, some markers are missing, so original photographs were used. By digitizing this publication, an on-line publication can be purchased by anyone interested in our Colorado Historical Markers and will make updating, revising and adding new markers much easier. Our hopes were to include a Website of the Colorado Historical Markers accessible on our Colorado State Society Website. I would like to thank Jackie Sopko, Arkansas Valley Chapter, Pueblo Colorado for her long hours in front of a computer screen, scanning, updating, formatting and supporting me in this project. I would also like to thank the many Colorado DAR Chapters that participated in this project. I owe them all a huge debt of gratitude for giving freely of their time to this project. -
Appendix L—Acec Evaluations for the Price Resource Management Plan
Proposed RMP/Final EIS Appendix L APPENDIX L—ACEC EVALUATIONS FOR THE PRICE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Section 202(c)(3) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) requires that priority be given to the designation and protection of areas of critical environmental concern (ACEC). FLPMA Section 103 (a) defines ACECs as public lands for which special management attention is required (when such areas are developed or used or when no development is required) to protect and prevent irreparable damage to important historic, cultural, or scenic values; fish and wildlife resources; or other natural systems or processes or to protect life and safety from natural hazards. CURRENTLY DESIGNATED ACECS BROUGHT FORWARD INTO THE PRICE RMP FROM THE SAN RAFAEL RMP In its Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare this Resource Management Plan (RMP) (Federal Register, Volume 66, No. 216, November 7, 2001, Notice of Intent, Environmental Impact Statement, Price Resource Management Plan, Utah), BLM identified the 13 existing ACECs created in the San Rafael RMP of 1991. The NOI explained BLM’s intention to bring these ACECs forward into the Price Field Office (PFO) RMP. A scoping report was prepared in May 2002 to summarize the public and agency comments received in response to the NOI. The few comments that were received were supportive of continued management as ACECs. The ACEC Manual (BLM Manual 1613, September 29, 1988) states, “Normally, the relevance and importance of resource or hazards associated with an existing ACEC are reevaluated only when new information or changed circumstances or the results of monitoring establish a need.” The following discussion is a brief review of the existing ACECs created by the San Rafael RMP of 1991 and discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). -
The Earliest Bioturbators As Ecosystem Engineers
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 Engineering the Cambrian explosion: the earliest bioturbators as ecosystem engineers LIAM G. HERRINGSHAW1,2*, RICHARD H. T. CALLOW1,3 & DUNCAN MCILROY1 1Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Prince Philip Drive, St John’s, NL, A1B 3X5, Canada 2Geology, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK 3Statoil ASA, Stavanger 4035, Norway *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: By applying modern biological criteria to trace fossil types and assessing burrow mor- phology, complexity, depth, potential burrow function and the likelihood of bioirrigation, we assign ecosystem engineering impact (EEI) values to the key ichnotaxa in the lowermost Cambrian (Fortunian). Surface traces such as Monomorphichnus have minimal impact on sediment properties and have very low EEI values; quasi-infaunal traces of organisms that were surficial modifiers or biodiffusors, such as Planolites, have moderate EEI values; and deeper infaunal, gallery biodiffu- sive or upward-conveying/downward-conveying traces, such as Teichichnus and Gyrolithes, have the highest EEI values. The key Cambrian ichnotaxon Treptichnus pedum has a moderate to high EEI value, depending on its functional interpretation. Most of the major functional groups of mod- ern bioturbators are found to have evolved during the earliest Cambrian, including burrow types that are highly likely to have been bioirrigated. In fine-grained (or microbially bound) sedimentary environments, trace-makers of bioirrigated burrows would have had a particularly significant impact, generating advective fluid flow within the sediment for the first time, in marked contrast with the otherwise diffusive porewater systems of the Proterozoic. -
Distribution Management Plan 2019-2029
Colorado Parks and Wildlife Habitat Partnership Program White River DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT PLAN Approved – Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission: November 15, 2019 This plan is valid for 10 years from approval date. 2019-2029 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Map: White River HPP Area 3 Committee Members 4-5 Introduction 5-6 - HPP Orientation HPP Statute 5-6 Committee Objectives & Strategies 7-11 Area Description 12-16 -Map: Land Ownership -Habitat Description Big Game Population Summary 16-27 -Maps: Big Game Ranges & Migrations -Map: Impact Areas & Description -Game Management Objectives Project Types & Priorities 27-29 Operating Guidelines 29-30 -Management Strategies Budget Guidelines 30-31 Current & Foreseeable Issues 31-32 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The White River Valley is home to some of the largest herds of elk and mule deer in the State of Colorado and also has small herds of antelope, bighorn sheep, and moose. The area supports a vibrant agricultural community in addition to active coal mining and oil and gas development. Since inception of the WRHPP committee in 1993, it has worked in cooperation with CPW to significantly reduce the White River Elk herd with aggressive antlerless harvest strategies to within the desired population objective, thus conflicts within the WRHPP area have been greatly reduced. However, the success of the distribution management plan depends heavily upon the ability to foster cooperation between the landowners and the hunting public since a major tool for moving the animals from the conflict areas, and decreasing the numbers will be the public hunters. Landowners in the WRHPP area have been reluctant in the past to open their private lands to the general public for reasons ranging from protection of their property to maximizing hunting income. -
Palaeobiological and Palaeonvironmental Significance of the Pliocene Trace Fossil Dactyloidites Peniculus
Palaeobiological and palaeonvironmental significance of the Pliocene trace fossil Dactyloidites peniculus ALFRED UCHMAN and PETER PERVESLER Uchman, A. and Pervesler, P. 2007. Palaeobiological and palaeonvironmental significance of the Pliocene trace fossil Dactyloidites peniculus. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (4): 799–808. The radial trace fossil Dactyloidites peniculus occurs in a deep tier in totally bioturbated shoreface sediments of Pliocene age in the Stirone Valley, N Italy, together with Thalassinoides isp. and Ophiomorpha nodosa. Long, narrow shafts run− ning from centre of the radiating structure and abundant faecal pellets in the radial structure were discovered. The trace maker of D. peniculus, probably a polychaete, deposited the pellets deeply in the sediment, probably for reinforcement of the tubes and a gardening of microbes for feeding. This trace fossil exclusively occurs within a narrow horizon at the top of a shallowing−up section interpreted as a high−stand system tract, below a discontinuity surface capped by finer sedi− ments. D. peniculus was formed in soft sandy sediments under stable conditions related to the latest phases of the high− stand system tract. Therefore, it is a candidate for indication of similar environmental situations having a soft sandy, but stable sea floor. Key words: Tracefossils,Dactyloidites, gardening, sequence stratigraphy, marine flooding, foredeep, Neogene, Pliocene. Alfred Uchman [[email protected]] Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, ul. Oleandry 2a, PL−30−063 Kraków, Poland; Peter Pervesler [[email protected]] Department of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A−1090 Vienna, Austria. Introduction fill related to the Southern Alps and Apennines. The Late Pliocene sediments are interpreted as a regressive succession Dactyloidites peniculus, a radial trace fossil, has been de− deposited in the transition from outer to inner shelf (Domi− scribed by D’Alessandro and Bromley (1986) from Pleisto− nici 2001, 2004). -
Grazing Allotments Table
RANGELAND PROBLEMS/CONFLICTS 10 YEAR AVERAGE * ALLOTMENT PERIOD OF USE * FORAGE ALLOCATED TO OTHER SPECIES / USES ALLOTMENT ACRES * ECOLOGICAL CONDITION / SUCCESSION ALLOTMENT PERMITTED USE ACTUAL USE % FEDERAL KIND OF ALLOTMENT NAME MANAGEMENT CURRENT GRAZING SYSTEM * RANGELAND HEALTH STANDARDS NUMBER (AUMS) RANGE LIVESTOCK CATEGORY * RIPARIAN INVENTORY BEGINNING ENDING (AUMS) (MILES/ACRES) 1985 BOOKCLIFFS RMP 1994 DIAMOND MOUNTAIN RMP 1-Riparian Areas Unsatisfactory Condition; 2-Infestation of M- ACTIVE SUSPENDED ACTUAL NON-USE CONTINUOUS DEFERRED REST Unwanted Species; 3-Livestock Control; 4-Season of Use; 5- (FEDERAL ACRES) (% PUBLIC ACRES) AS OF 1994 MEETING STANDARDS Management USE ROTATION Excessive Soil Erosion; 6-Vegation Diversity; 7-Insufficient Forage; 8- C-cattle FEDERAL STATE PRIVATE TRIBAL OTHER YEAR YEAR Excessive Slope; 9-Insufficient Water; 10-Recreation Conflicts; 11-Oil I-Improve DEER ANTELOPE ELK BH SHEEP MOOSE WILD C-Custodial S-sheep ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT & Gas Conflicts; 12-Rock Outcrop/Badlands; 13-Low % Public Land; HORSES H-horses * LENTIC * LOTIC EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR EARLY MID LATE SCHEDULED COMPLETED STD 1 STD 2 STD 3 STD 4 14- Excessive Use Areas Due to Poor Distribution; 15- Tresspass concerns; ANTELOPE DRAW 15854 I 7198 11/16 4/27 1381 2298 X 93 S 155 87 56928 4597 6 3970 19466 28818 0 2002 2002 2,4,10 ANTELOPE POWERS 15879 M 3091 1372 11/20 4/20 1046 2150 X 100 C/S 100 201 106 35697 4221 410 4516 615 2010 4,11 ARGYLE RIDGE 7 04873 I 339 80 6/1 11/15 144 152 X 20 C 350 377 50 9081 1171 8294 3 2 47 51 -
MAY 2014 VOLUME 41, ISSUE 05 Canadian Publication Mail Contract – 40070050 MORE THAN MAPPING WANT to LIFT YOUR PETREL® WORKFLOWS to NEW HEIGHTS?
20 Fossils Hunting for Provinces 28 Go Take a Hike 34 GeoConvention 2014: Focus 36 Bringing the Cretaceous Sea to Mount Royal University: A Proposal to Fund the East Gate Entrance Fossil Display $10.00 MAY 2014 VOLUME 41, ISSUE 05 Canadian Publication Mail Contract – 40070050 MORE THAN MAPPING WANT TO LIFT YOUR PETREL® WORKFLOWS TO NEW HEIGHTS? Seamlessly bring more data into the fold. Dynamically present your insight like never before. SOFTWARE SERVICES CONNECTIVITY DATA MANAGEMENT The Petrosys Plug-in for Petrel® gives you access to powerful Petrosys mapping, surface modeling and data exchange from right where you need it – inside Petrel. Now you have the power to effortlessly and meticulously bring your critical knowledge together on one potent mapping canvas. Work intuitively with your Petrel knowledge and, should you so require, simultaneously aggregate, map and model data direct from multiple other sources – OpenWorks®, ArcSDE®, IHS™ Kingdom®, PPDM™ and more. Refine, enhance and then present your results in beautiful, compelling detail. The result? Decision-making is accelerated through consistent mapping and surface modeling as focus moves from regional overview through to the field and reservoir scale. To learn more go to www.petrosys.com.au/petrel. Petrel is a registered trademark of Schlumberger Limited and/or its affiliates. OpenWorks is a registered trademark of Halliburton. ESRI trademarks provided under license from ESRI. IHS and Kingdom are trademarks or registered trademarks of IHS, Inc. PPDM is a trademark of the Professional Petroleum Data Management (PPDM) Association. MAY 2014 – VOLUME 41, ISSUE 05 ARTICLES Fossils Hunting for Provinces ..................................................................................................... 20 CSPG OFFICE Tools to Tackle the Riddle of the Sands ............................................................................... -
PDF Linkchapter
Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 382, 388 Amargosa River, 285, 309, 311, 322, Arkansas River, 443, 456, 461, 515, Abort Lake, 283 337, 341, 342 516, 521, 540, 541, 550, 556, Abies, 21, 25 Amarillo, Texas, 482 559, 560, 561 Abra, 587 Amarillo-Wichita uplift, 504, 507, Arkansas River valley, 512, 531, 540 Absaroka Range, 409 508 Arlington volcanic field, 358 Acer, 21, 23, 24 Amasas Back, 387 Aromas dune field, 181 Acoma-Zuni scction, 374, 379, 391 Ambrose tenace, 522, 523 Aromas Red Sand, 180 stream evolution patterns, 391 Ambrosia, 21, 24 Arroyo Colorado, 395 Aden Crater, 368 American Falls Lava Beds, 275, 276 Arroyo Seco unit, 176 Afton Canyon, 334, 341 American Falls Reservoir, 275, 276 Artemisia, 21, 24 Afton interglacial age, 29 American River, 36, 165, 173 Ascension Parish, Louisana, 567 aggradation, 167, 176, 182, 226, 237, amino acid ash, 81, 118, 134, 244, 430 323, 336, 355, 357, 390, 413, geochronology, 65, 68 basaltic, 85 443, 451, 552, 613 ratios, 65 beds, 127,129 glaciofluvial, 423 aminostratigraphy, 66 clays, 451 Piedmont, 345 Amity area, 162 clouds, 95 aggregate, 181 Anadara, 587 flows, 75, 121 discharge, 277 Anastasia Formation, 602, 642, 647 layer, 10, 117 Agua Fria Peak area, 489 Anastasia Island, 602 rhyolitic, 170 Agua Fria River, 357 Anchor Silt, 188, 198, 199 volcanic, 54, 85, 98, 117, 129, Airport bench, 421, 423 Anderson coal, 448 243, 276, 295, 396, 409, 412, Alabama coastal plain, 594 Anderson Pond, 617, 618 509, 520 Alamosa Basin, 366 andesite, 75, 80, 489 Ash Flat, 364 Alamosa