DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Andrew Bernstein Final Thesis Draft.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Andrew Bernstein Final Thesis Draft.Pdf THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE POLITICIZING THE IMMIGRATION COURTS: THE EFFECT OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ON THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS ANDREW BERNSTEIN SPRING 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Political Science and Spanish with honors in Political Science Reviewed and approved* by the following: Michael Nelson Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Michael Berkman Professor of Political Science Honors Adviser *Electronic approvals are on file i ABSTRACT While persuading Congress to pass immigration legislation may be difficult for a president, this is not the only mechanism by which a president may influence immigration policy. In fact, even outside of the president’s well-known ability to issue executive orders, the chief executive also has the ability to influence the bureaucracy tasked with interpreting and carrying out immigration policy. In this thesis, I focus on one such element of the bureaucracy: The Board of Immigration Appeals. And, I focus on it between the middle of the Obama presidency through the middle of the Trump presidency. This Board is an Article I, quasi-judicial body which decides appeals from cases originally heard by immigration judges. Using a logistic regression on the precedent decisions made by the Board, I found that the Trump administration was able to influence the Board of Immigration Appeals such that, all else equal, the Board was more likely to decide cases against immigrants under the tenure of Attorney General William Barr than under Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch. An analysis at the judge-level was also completed, but no strong relationship was found between individual judges’ votes and presiding attorney general. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... v Chapter 1 Information .................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review ........................................................................................ 4 An Overview of the Board of Immigration Appeals ........................................................ 5 A History of the Board of Immigration Appeals .............................................................. 8 Attorney General Influence over the Board of Immigration Appeals via Changing the Structure and Procedures of the Board ..................................................................... 9 Attorney General Influence over the Board Immigration Appeals via the Certification Power11 Relevant Literature regarding Judicial Behavior ............................................................. 13 Where this Research fits into the Extant Literature ......................................................... 15 Chapter 3 Theory ......................................................................................................... 16 Historical Background ..................................................................................................... 16 Judicial Behavior and the Board of Immigration Appeals ............................................... 20 Hypotheses ....................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 4 Data ............................................................................................................. 24 Chapter 5 Results ......................................................................................................... 32 Chapter 6 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 39 Implications ...................................................................................................................... 41 Limitations ....................................................................................................................... 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 45 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Organizational chart detailing the Executive Office for Immigration Review's place within the Department of Justice ...................................................................................... 6 Figure 2. Organizational chart detailing the Board of Immigration Appeal's place within the Executive Office for Immigration Review ....................................................................... 6 Figure 3. A timeline of the history of the Board of Immigration Appeals ............................... 9 Figure 4. The proportion of BIA decisions under each attorney general decided in favor of (light bars) and against (dark bars) immigrants ......................................................................... 27 Figure 5. The proportion BIA decisions in favor of immigrants (light bars) and against immigrants (dark bars) across cases where a dissent was recorded (yes) and cases where dissents were not recorded (no). ....................................................................................... 28 Figure 6. The proportion BIA decisions in favor of immigrants (light bars) and against immigrants (dark bars) across cases where a remand was present (yes) and cases where a remand was not present (no) ............................................................................................ 29 Figure 7. The proportion BIA decisions in favor of immigrants (light bars) and against immigrants (dark bars) across cases where the Department of Homeland Security appealed (DHS) and cases where the immigrant appealed ............................................................. 30 Figure 8. Model predicted probability of a favorable decision for the immigrant across attorneys general, assuming that the case was not remanded to the BIA and the respondent appealed 34 Figure 9. Model predicted probability of a favorable decision for the immigrant across attorneys general, assuming that the case was not remanded to the BIA and DHS appealed ......... 34 Figure 10. Model predicted probability of a favorable decision for the immigrant across attorneys general, assuming the case was remanded to the BIA and the respondent appealed ....... 35 Figure 11. Model predicted probability of a favorable decision for the immigrant across attorneys general, assuming the case was remanded to the BIA and DHS appealed....................... 35 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary statistics at the case level ........................................................................... 30 Table 2. Summary statistics at the judge level ......................................................................... 31 Table 3. Logistic regression measuring attorney general impact on the disposition of cases at the case-level .......................................................................................................................... 32 Table 4. Logistic regression measuring attorney general impact at the judge-vote level ........ 37 Table 5. Judge-vote predictions based off of the logistic regression model ............................ 38 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to begin by acknowledging Dr. Nelson. His guidance, encouragement, and mentorship were essential to the completion of this work and have bettered me as a student. Next, I would like to acknowledge Dr. Berkman whose advice and criticisms sharpened my analysis and arguments. I am of course acknowledging my supportive family who will undoubtably need another reminder regarding the topic of my thesis within a day of my submission. Additionally, I am acknowledging my awesome friends, girlfriend, and roommates, including the infamous and mysterious one who prefers to go by the name “data boy.” Thank you to the many others who I may have forgotten to mention. There are simply so many wonderful people who have contributed to bettering my academic experience; it is a blessing most of the time, but a curse when it comes to acknowledging you all. 1 Chapter 1 Information “Immigration Judges have been placed in the untenable position of having to choose between honoring their oath of office against ensuring their continued employment. Problematic agency policy decisions such as the imposition of quotas and deadlines, micromanagement of individual dockets, and unilateral insertion of the Attorney General into pending cases, have resulted in a fatally flawed system.” (NAIJ, 2019) The National Association of Immigration Judges released this statement on June 17th, 2019. The goal of this statement was to advocate for an independent immigration court system that would no longer be housed within the Justice Department. As it currently stands, immigration courts are under the control of the Justice Department, which means that they are under the purview of the attorney general. Critics argue that this inherently reduces the independence of immigration courts and that it creates a scenario in which attorneys general who wish to unilaterally upend immigration adjudication have the means to do so (Legomsky, 2006). This paper explores political influence in immigration adjudication through the study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CIGIE 18Th Annual Awards Ceremony Booklet
    18th Annual Awards Ceremony October 22nd 2015 18th Annual Awards Ceremony October 22nd 2015 Ronald Reagan Building Amphitheatre 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 18th Annual Awards Ceremony October 22nd 2015 CIGIE AWARDS – 2015 Order of Events Presentation of Colors and National Anthem Welcoming Remarks Kathy A. Buller CIGIE Awards Program Co-Chair Inspector General, Peace Corps Keynote Address The Honorable Loretta Lynch Attorney General Special Category Awards Presentation The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz CIGIE Chair Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice Allison Lerner CIGIE Vice Chair Inspector General, National Science Foundation Alexander Hamilton Award Gaston L. Gianni, Jr. Better Government Award Glenn/Roth Exemplary Service Award Sentner Award for Dedication and Courage June Gibbs Brown Career Achievement Award Individual Accomplishment Award Barry R. Snyder Joint Award CIGIE Awards Presentation The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz CIGIE Chair, Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Allison Lerner CIGIE Vice Chair, Inspector General, National Science Foundation Closing Remarks The Honorable Kathleen Tighe CIGIE Awards Program Co-Chair, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Education · ii · Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency Loretta E. Lynch. was sworn in as the 83rd Attorney General of the United States by Vice President Joe Biden on April 27, 2015. President Barack Obama announced his intention to nominate Ms. Lynch on November 8, 2014. Ms. Lynch received her A.B., cum laude, from Harvard College in 1981, and her J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1984. In 1990, after a period in private practice, Ms. Lynch joined the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, located in Brooklyn, New York—the city she considers her adopted home.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vcf 20Th Anniversary Special Report
    20TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL REPORT September 2021 THE VCF 20TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL REPORT Message from Attorney General Merrick Garland ................................................................................................................1 Message from Special Master Rupa Bhattacharyya .......................................................................................................... 2 Timeline ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Reflections From Special Master Kenneth R. Feinberg and Camille S. Biros ....................................................4 Reaching Those Who Were There ............................................................................................................................................5-6 Reflections from Special Master Sheila Birnbaum ..............................................................................................................7 Reflections from Deputy Special Master Deborah Greenspan ..................................................................................8 VCF Website .................................................................................................................................................................................................9 VCF HelpLine ................................................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Sen. Jeff Sessions's Record on Criminal Justice
    Analysis: Sen. Jeff Sessions’s Record on Criminal Justice By Ames C. Grawert This analysis provides a brief summary of Sen. Jeff Sessions’s past statements, votes, and practices relating to criminal justice. Specifically, this analysis finds that: • Sen. Sessions opposes efforts to reduce unnecessarily long federal prison sentences for nonviolent crimes, despite a consensus for reform even within his own party. In 2016, he personally blocked the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, a bipartisan effort spearheaded by Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and John Cornyn (R- Texas), and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), and supported by law enforcement leadership. As Attorney General, Sen. Sessions could stall current congressional efforts to pass this legislation to recalibrate federal sentencing laws. • Drug convictions made up 40 percent of Sen. Sessions’s convictions when he served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama — double the rate of other Alabama federal prosecutors. Today, state and federal law enforcement officers have begun to focus resources on violent crime, and away from archaic drug war policies. But Sen. Sessions continues to oppose any attempts to legalize marijuana and any reduction in drug sentences. As Attorney General, Sen. Sessions could direct federal prosecutors to pursue the harshest penalties possible for even low-level drug offenses, a step backward from Republican- supported efforts to modernize criminal justice policy. • Unlike many Republican legislators, Sen. Sessions supports the use of “civil asset forfeiture,” which allows police to confiscate property from people who may not even be accused of a crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
    S. HRG. 114–178 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Fiscal Year 2016 114th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2578 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE—OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2016 (H.R. 2578) S. HRG. 114–178 COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2578 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF COM- MERCE AND JUSTICE, AND SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Department of Commerce—Office of the Secretary Department of Justice—Office of the Attorney General Drug Enforcement Administration Federal Bureau of Investigation National Aeronautics and Space Administration Nondepartmental Witnesses United States Marshals Service Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=senate&committee=appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 93–106 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman MITCH McCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A.
    [Show full text]
  • Blank Logs Template
    FOIA Requests Closed by OIP in September 2017 Request Number Office Submitted Date Date Closed Summary of Request Disposition of Request DOJ-2017-006081 DAG 08/15/2017 09/01/2017 Copy of the September 9, 2015 memorandum from former Deputy Attorney Full grant General Sally Yates pertaining to individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing. DOJ-2017-005839 AG 08/04/2017 09/01/2017 Records submitted pursuant to Executive Order 13800, Strengthening the All records referred to another Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure. agency DOJ-2017-005919 OIP 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning Freedom of Information Act requests and responses No records regarding Senator Joe Manchin submitted since November 2012. DOJ-2017-005681 AG 07/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-004908 AG 06/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-005914 AG 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records pertaining to meeting between President Bill Clinton and Attorney Partial grant/partial denial General Loretta Lynch that took place at the Phoenix airport in June 2016. DOJ-2014-000036 ASG 10/21/2013 09/06/2017 Records resulting from a search of the Departmental Executive Secretariat All records referred to another database involving the term "Guantanamo." agency DOJ-2015-000022 AG 10/22/2014 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Department of Justice Obscenity Prosecution Task Full grant Force in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • USC Dornsife in the News Archive - 2015
    USC Dornsife in the News Archive - 2015 December Wednesday, December 23, 2015 CBS News featured research presented by John Platt of USC Dornsife College to the American Geophysical Union that may explain mysterious fault lines. Platt said when two faults collide, they may merge like a zipper, instead of breaking past one another. "It may solve some long-standing and intractable problems concerning the timing and displacement on faults," he said. EdTech wrote about a $2.7 million U.S. Department of Education grant for a digital game project by Daphna Oyserman, Dean’s Professor of Psychology and professor of psychology, education and communication. Oyserman will work with the nonprofit McREL, game developer Filament Games, and the South Centeral Colorado Board of Cooperative Education Services to build and test the game based on Oyserman's "identity-based motivation" for teens. The Wall Street Journal ran an op-ed by Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics, about Sen. Lindsey Graham's decision to end his presidential campaign. Tuesday, December 22, 2015 The Nation highlighted research by Manuel Pastor, Turpanjian Chair in Civil Society and Social Change and professor of sociology and American studies and ethnicity, and colleagues on the economic impact of Prop. 13 in California. If Prop. 13 was reformed so that commercial and industrial properties were taxed at market rate, the state could generate between $8.2-10.2 billion. Pastor noted that Prop. 13 affects younger Californians - who are predominantly non-white - more than older, more established residents. Daily Mail featured research by Margaret Gatz, professor of psychology, gerontology and preventive medicine, and Andrew Petkus, a postdoctoral researcher in psychology, along with colleagues finding that long-term anxiety can increase the risk for dementia.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Department of Justice, and State Efforts to Legalize Marijuana
    LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW _________________________________ VOLUME 4 SPRING 2017 ISSUE 2 _____________________________________ THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, AND STATE EFFORTS TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA Zachary C. Bolitho1 I. INTRODUCTION A hypothetical young entrepreneur named Ernest recently read an article reporting that marijuana distribution was a lucrative business. After extensive research and discussions with some friends who work in the “marijuana industry,” Ernest decided to open a retail store selling marijuana in his hometown of Raleigh, North Carolina. He entered a supply agreement with a local horticulturist who was also an expert marijuana grower. Ernest named his business “Best Buds Dispensary, Inc.,” registered it with the secretary of 1Assistant Professor, Campbell University School of Law, Raleigh, North Carolina. The author would like to thank Evan Wright and the staff of the Lincoln Memorial University Law Review for the invitation to present this article as part of the law review’s symposium. The author would also like to thank Travis LaFay and Thomas Hughes for their research assistance. THE U.S. CONST., THE U.S. D.O.J, AND STATE EFFORTS TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA 43 state’s office, rented a storefront in a strip mall, outfitted the space with display cases and shelving, hung some signs, hired a few employees, and opened for business on December 1, 2016. His dispensary sold loose-leaf marijuana, marijuana joints, and so-called “marijuana edibles.” The business operated on a cash-only basis, and business was booming due in part to an advertising campaign Ernest started on social media. In the first week, Ernest sold over 60 kilograms of marijuana and generated a profit of $50,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney General's Calendar
    I 10;30 AM .11:00 AM MMting with European Commksloner Malmstrom AG's Conference Room POC: Denise Cheung DOJ: Gary Grindler, Denise Cheung, Bruce Swartz, Chris Schroeder, Paul Almanza, Drew Oosterbaan, Tom Burrows POC: Stewart Robinson Anna Cecilia Malmstrom, Commissioner Erik Gustav Windmar, Member of Cabinet Jose Maria Muriel Palomino, Counselor European Delegation OOJ Photographer 11:00 AM • 12:00 PM OFFICE TIME 11:30 AM - 11;50 AM ~~~~~~~~"IE!,e~~~mpoo.~5~1 AG's Conference ROO~ POC: Channing Phillips DOJ: Channing Phillips, USA Heaphy, ceu Chief Kevin Carwile, Anh-Thu Mai-Windle (Civil Di v. employee shadowing Channing) 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM MEETING AG ' s Conference Room POC: Annie Bradley Contact 1# for Kinney Zalesne C: 10: 12:30 PM - 1:15 PM LUNCH 1:30 PM • 2:00 PM WHkly Meeting with AASG Tony Wert AG ' s Conference Room POC: Gary Grindler DOJ: Gary Grindler, Tonv W est 2:00 PM • 2:30 PM OFFICE TIME 2:30 PM • 3:00 PM Cluarterly Meeting wtth Antitnlst DMslon AG's Conference Room POC: Helaine Greenfeld 001: Gary Grindler, Helaine Greenfeld, Joseph Wavland, Jamillia Ferris, leslie Overton. Gene Kimmelman 3:25 PM. 3:30 PM PHONE CALL TO THE AG FROM THE TRIAL TEAM AND USA LYNCH AG 's Office USA LYNCH AND TRIAL TEAM Otus2009, AG (SMO) 5/4j2012 10:01 AM IMay 01. 2012 Continued Tuesday 3:30 PM - 4:00 PM MEETING WITH THE DAG AG's office 4:00 PM - 4:45 PM OFFICE TIME 4:45 PM - 5:30 PM Monthly Meeting with the AG AG's Conference Room POC: Gary Grindler DOl: AG, Gary Grindler, Margaret Richardson, Helaine Greenfeld, Doug Letter, DAG Cole, AASG West, AAG Weich, Stuart Goldberg, Dave O'Neil, Elizabeth Taylor, Tracy Schmaler, Brin Frazier Otus2009, AG (SMO) 2 5/4/2012 10:01 AM IMay 02, 2012 Wednesday 9:00 AM • 9:10 AM FBI DirKtof I AG FBI sloe OOJ: AG.
    [Show full text]
  • September 18, 2020 the Honorable Michael E. Horowitz Inspector
    September 18, 2020 The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz Inspector General Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Inspector General Horowitz: We write to ask that you open an emergency investigation into whether U.S. Attorney General William Barr, U.S. Attorney John Durham, and other Department of Justice (“DOJ”) political appointees are following DOJ’s longstanding policy to avoid taking official actions or other steps that could improperly influence the upcoming presidential election. We also request that you evaluate the authority and scope under which U.S. Attorney Durham is operating, as Attorney General Barr has only provided vague and shifting statements about the purpose and scope of the investigation. We are concerned by indications that Attorney General Barr might depart from longstanding DOJ principles to take public action related to U.S. Attorney Durham’s investigation that could impact the presidential election. Under longstanding DOJ policy, the Attorney General is expected to refrain from commenting on an ongoing investigation. Attorney General Barr and U.S. Attorney Durham have made several public comments that could violate this Department policy and related guidelines.1 Attorney General Barr has signaled repeatedly that he is likely to allow DOJ to take prosecutorial actions, make public disclosures, and even issue reports before the presidential election in November. Such actions clearly appear intended to benefit President Trump politically. Specifically, Attorney General Barr has indicated that he would consider taking such steps in the Durham investigation—including the issuance of a report or other summary—within 60 days of the upcoming election.
    [Show full text]
  • First African American Woman Attorney General Eric Braun This Page Left Blank Intentionally Loretta Lynch
    LORETTA LYNCH FIRST AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC BRAUN This Page Left Blank Intentionally LORETTA LYNCH LORETTA LYNCH FIRST AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC BRAUN LERNER PUBLICATIONS MINNEAPOLIS Copyright © 2016 by Lerner Publishing Group, Inc. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of Lerner Publishing Group, Inc., except for the inclusion of brief quotations in an acknowledged review. Lerner Publications Company A division of Lerner Publishing Group, Inc. 241 First Avenue North Minneapolis, MN USA 55401 For reading levels and more information, look up this title at www.lernerbooks.com. Main body text set in Rotis Serif Std 55 Regular 13.5/17. Typeface provided by Adobe Systems. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Braun, Eric, author. Loretta Lynch : first African American woman Attorney General / Eric Braun. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-5124-0586-6 (lb : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-5124-0587-3 (eb pdf) 1. Lynch, Loretta, 1959– —Juvenile literature. 2. African American women lawyers— Biography—Juvenile literature. 3. African American public prosecutors—Biography—Juvenile literature. 4. Women attorneys general—United States—Biography—Juvenile literature. I. Title. KF373.L95B73 2016 349.73092—dc23 [B] 2015025914 Manufactured in the United States of America 1 – VP – 12/31/15 CONTENTS BORN TO FIGHT FOR JUSTICE 12 SCHOOL DAYS 15 A RISING PROSECUTOR 18 TURNING POINT 20 A PUBLIC SERVANT 23 FROM PUBLIC LIFE TO PRIVATE— AND BACK AGAIN 25 THE PATH TO ATTORNEY GENERAL 30 A HARD-WON CONFIRMATION 33 IMPORTANT DATES 40 SOURCE NOTES 42 SELECTED BibLIOGRAPHY 44 FURTHER REAdiNG 46 INDEX 47 Loretta Lynch is sworn in during her confi rmation hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues of CONSISTENCY in the Federal Death Penalty
    Issues of CONSISTENCY in the Federal Death Penalty A Roundtable Discussion on the Role of the U.S. Attorney Robin Campbell, Writer © Vera Institute of Justice, 2002. All Rights Reserved. Publication of this booklet was support- ed by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Unattributed points of view are those of the author and do not represent the position or policies of the MacArthur Foundation. Additional copies are available from the communications department of the Vera Institute of Justice, 233 Broadway, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10279. An electronic version of this publication is available on Vera’s web site at www.vera.org. Photography COVER: Photos by © Ken Light; far left photo by © Andrew Lichenstein, Aurora. Participant photos by © Philippe Cheng Design Criscola Design Issues of CONSISTENCY in the Federal Death Penalty A Roundtable Discussion on the Role of the U.S. Attorney Contents 2 Participants 3 Consistency: is it attainable? 5 Who prosecutes death penalty-eligible cases? 9 Deciding to seek the death penalty—or not 11 U.S. Attorneys and the Justice Department 13 Questions of racial/ethnic disparity 16 Final thoughts 19 Death penalty offenses Roundtable Participants* and the years they served as U.S. Attorneys Kent B. Alexander Northern District, Georgia; 1994–1997 Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Emory University Zachary Carter Eastern District, New York; 1993–1999 Partner, Dorsey & Whitney LLP Michael H. Dettmer Western District, Michigan; 1994–2001 Counsel, Parsons Ringsmuth PLC Edward L. Dowd, Jr. Eastern District, Missouri; 1993–2000 Partner, Bryan Cave LLP J. Don Foster Southern District, Alabama; 1994–2000 Trial Lawyer, Jackson, Foster and Graham, LLC Walter C.
    [Show full text]
  • Calling It Like It Is: Republicans Continue to Disrespect President Obama with Obstruction of Supreme Court Nomination
    Calling it like it is: Republicans Continue to Disrespect President Obama with Obstruction of Supreme Court Nomination Within an hour of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s confirmed passing, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made an unprecedented announcement: That the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, had no authority to name a replacement to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now that President Obama has done his constitutional duty by nominating Chief Judge Merrick Garland to fill the vacancy, most Republicans are continuing their disrespect to President Obama by refusing to grant a hearing, hold a vote, or even meet with his highly regarded and impressively qualified nominee. This twists every understanding of the constitutional duties of the President. But, sadly, it is what so many of us have come to expect of congressional Republicans after almost eight years of attempts to undermine, obstruct, and delegitimize the authority of our nation’s first Black president. Since the day President Obama took office, Republicans have channeled animus into an unprecedented campaign to undermine and disrespect the presidency, including: • Spreading lies that President Obama is a citizen of Kenya, not the United States, until well into his presidency. People who have spread “birtherism” include Mitt Romney, Donald Trump, Newt Gingrich, and even sitting members of Congress. • In his first year of office, South Carolina Congressman Joe “You Lie!” Wilson made an unprecedented and deeply disrespectful outburst when the President was addressing a joint session of Congress during the State of the Union address. • The Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, declaring that making President Obama a one- term president was his “number one priority.” • Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani declaring that President Obama doesn’t love America.
    [Show full text]