DOCSLIB.ORG

William Pelham Barr January 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
William Pelham Barr January 2019 William Pelham Barr January 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. 2 Top Takeaways From Research ............................................................................................. 4 Barr’s “Particularly Extensive” Corporate Background Ties Him To Major Issues Still Pending Before Justice Department, Other Federal Agencies ......................................................................................................... 4 Summary: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Background: Barr’s Close Corporate Ties And Their Pending Issues With Federal Agencies ......................................... 4 Barr Was Criticized For Excessive Compensation at Verizon, Approved Large Bonuses For Executives On Other Corporate Boards ........................................................................................................................... 10 Summary: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Background: Barr’s Involvement With Corporate Executive Compensation ............................................................... 10 Companies Tied To Barr Have Faced Major Regulatory Violations, Criminal Investigations ....................... 13 Summary: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Background: Regulatory Violations Of And Criminal Investigations Into Barr-Tied Companies .................................. 13 Barr Known For Aggressive Lobbying Tactics On Behalf Of Corporations ................................................... 18 Summary: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Background: Barr’s Aggressive, One-Sided Approach .................................................................................................. 18 Barr Has Criticized Mueller Investigation, Was Previously Vocal Critic Of Independent Counsel Law ......... 22 Summary: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Background: Barr’s Opposition To The Mueller Investigation And His Previous Criticism Of An Independent Counsel Law ............................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Barr Has Supported, Defended Controversial Trump Actions .................................................................... 23 Summary: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Background: Barr’s Support And Defense Of The White House .................................................................................. 23 Background: Barr’s Career ................................................................................................... 26 Trump Administration .............................................................................................................................. 26 Criticism of Mueller Investigation ................................................................................................................................ 26 Barr Previously Criticized Mueller Team For Political Donations, Was Regular Critic Of Independent Counsel Law .. 26 Previously: Mueller Ran Justice Department Criminal Division During Barr’s Term As General; Barr Praised Mueller’s FBI Leadership After 9/11. ........................................................................................................................................... 27 Barr Has Repeatedly Expressed Support For Controversial Trump Actions ................................................................. 28 Barr Criticized Trump’s Lack Of Senate Conferees ....................................................................................................... 30 Praise of Jeff Sessions .................................................................................................................................................. 30 George W. Bush Administration ............................................................................................................... 31 George H.W. Bush Administration ............................................................................................................ 32 Virginia Commission On Parole Abolition and Sentencing Reform ............................................................ 35 William & Mary Board of Visitors ............................................................................................................. 35 2 Background: Barr’s Corporate Work ................................................................................... 37 Dominion Energy ...................................................................................................................................... 37 Atlantic Coast Pipeline ................................................................................................................................................. 39 EPA Mercury Regulations ............................................................................................................................................. 41 Environmental/Regulatory Violations and Litigation ................................................................................................... 43 Time Warner ............................................................................................................................................ 45 Caterpillar ................................................................................................................................................ 47 Verizon/GTE ............................................................................................................................................. 49 Net Neutrality .............................................................................................................................................................. 56 Och-Ziff Capital Management Group ........................................................................................................ 58 Holcim US and Aggregate Industries Management ................................................................................... 60 Clipper Fund (2014 – 2016) ....................................................................................................................... 63 Selected Funds (1994 – 2016) ................................................................................................................... 63 Mastiff Mhor, LLC ..................................................................................................................................... 65 Background: Barr On The Issues .......................................................................................... 66 Criminal Justice Reform ............................................................................................................................ 66 Death Penalty ........................................................................................................................................... 67 Immigration ............................................................................................................................................. 67 LGBT ......................................................................................................................................................... 68 Background: Barr’s Campaign Activity ................................................................................. 69 Overview Of Campaign Positions .............................................................................................................. 69 Political Positions: ........................................................................................................................................................ 69 Press Highlights From Campaign Work ........................................................................................................................ 69 Federal Campaign Contributions ............................................................................................................... 70 Barr Has Made Over $580,000 In Federal Campaign Contributions: ........................................................................... 70 3 TOP TAKEAWAYS FROM RESEARCH Barr’s “Particularly Extensive” Corporate Background Ties Him To Major Issues Still Pending Before Justice Department, Other Federal Agencies SUMMARY: Since his days leading the Justice Department, Attorney General nominee William Barr has reportedly continued to stay “in touch” with its “leaders and staff.” Now poised to take over once again, Barr’s “particularly extensive” corporate background is coming to light, tying him to issues pending with the Justice Department and other federal agencies. Dominion is awaiting major decisions from the Federal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CIGIE 18Th Annual Awards Ceremony Booklet
    18th Annual Awards Ceremony October 22nd 2015 18th Annual Awards Ceremony October 22nd 2015 Ronald Reagan Building Amphitheatre 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 18th Annual Awards Ceremony October 22nd 2015 CIGIE AWARDS – 2015 Order of Events Presentation of Colors and National Anthem Welcoming Remarks Kathy A. Buller CIGIE Awards Program Co-Chair Inspector General, Peace Corps Keynote Address The Honorable Loretta Lynch Attorney General Special Category Awards Presentation The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz CIGIE Chair Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice Allison Lerner CIGIE Vice Chair Inspector General, National Science Foundation Alexander Hamilton Award Gaston L. Gianni, Jr. Better Government Award Glenn/Roth Exemplary Service Award Sentner Award for Dedication and Courage June Gibbs Brown Career Achievement Award Individual Accomplishment Award Barry R. Snyder Joint Award CIGIE Awards Presentation The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz CIGIE Chair, Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Allison Lerner CIGIE Vice Chair, Inspector General, National Science Foundation Closing Remarks The Honorable Kathleen Tighe CIGIE Awards Program Co-Chair, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Education · ii · Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency Loretta E. Lynch. was sworn in as the 83rd Attorney General of the United States by Vice President Joe Biden on April 27, 2015. President Barack Obama announced his intention to nominate Ms. Lynch on November 8, 2014. Ms. Lynch received her A.B., cum laude, from Harvard College in 1981, and her J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1984. In 1990, after a period in private practice, Ms. Lynch joined the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, located in Brooklyn, New York—the city she considers her adopted home.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H7561
    December 8, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H7561 pick up a butter knife or something In closing this out, Mr. Speaker, I GENERAL LEAVE and fix him up right there on the spot. would like to say that Indiana has pro- Mr. ROKITA. Mr. Speaker, I ask b 1600 duced no shortage of great statesmen, unanimous consent that all Members as we reflected on this last half hour, It is a really humorous story that I have 5 legislative days to revise and ex- and Senator DAN COATS has indis- tend their remarks on the subject of enjoy his telling every time we are to- putably joined their ranks after dec- gether at an event. Senator COATS has this Special Order. ades of service to both our State and to The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there a great sense of humor. While his time our country. My own history with Sen- in the Senate has come to an end, I am objection to the request of the gen- ator COATS goes way back to when I also confident he will continue to be a tleman from Indiana? was an intern in his Senate office. If he There was no objection. voice and an advocate for the issues he were on this floor today, Mr. Speaker, f cares about most. Our State and our I am sure he would say that I was one country are lucky to have benefited of the worst interns he ever had. None- MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE from the service of a great man like theless, he started my career in poli- A message from the Senate by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement Tuesday, January 29, 2019
    Remarks as prepared for delivery by The Honorable Dan Coats Director of National Intelligence Annual Threat Assessment Opening Statement Tuesday, January 29, 2019 Chairman Burr, Vice-Chairman Warner, and Members of the Committee... I am here today, along with leaders of the Intelligence Community, to provide you an overview of the national security threats facing our nation. But before I do, I would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of the men and women that make up the Intelligence Community. Their efforts rarely receive public recognition because of the nature of the work that they do. But their unheralded contributions play a critical role in the national security of our great nation, and I am proud to represent them. 1 Annual Threat Assessment, January 29, 2019 I also want to express on behalf of the entire IC our appreciation to the members of this committee. The Intelligence Community appreciates your support and values our partnership. [PAUSE] My goal today is to responsibly convey to you and the American people, in this unclassified hearing, the true nature of the threat environment without overstating some of the more significant challenges we currently face and expect to contend with in the coming year… In the interest of time, I also would refer you to my Statement for the Record for a more complete threat picture. As I stated in my recent remarks during the release of the National Intelligence Strategy, we face significant changes in the domestic and global 2 Annual Threat Assessment, January 29, 2019 environment that have resulted in an increasingly complex and uncertain world, and we must be ready to meet 21st century challenges and recognize emerging threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Appointments Primer
    2021 NALEO Presidential Appointments Primer 2021 NALEO | PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENTS PRIMER America’s Latinos are strongly committed to public service at all levels of government, and possess a wealth of knowledge and skills to contribute as elected and appointed officials. The number of Latinos in our nation’s civic leadership has been steadily increasing as Latinos successfully pursue top positions in the public and private sectors. Throughout their tenure, and particularly during times of transition following elections, Presidential administrations seek to fill thousands of public service leadership and high-level support positions, and governing spots on advisory boards, commissions, and other bodies within the federal government. A strong Latino presence in the highest level appointments of President Joe Biden’s Administration is crucial to help ensure that the Administration develops policies and priorities that effectively address the issues facing the Latino community and all Americans. The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund is committed to ensuring that the Biden Administration appoints qualified Latinos to top government positions, including those in the Executive Office of the President, Cabinet-level agencies, sub-Cabinet, and the federal judiciary. This Primer provides information about the top positions available in the Biden Administration and how to secure them through the appointments process. 2021 NALEO | PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENTS PRIMER 2 2021 NALEO Presidential Appointments Primer TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND 4 AVAILABLE POSITIONS AND COMPENSATION 5 HOW TO APPLY 8 TYPICAL STEPS 10 In the Presidential Appointments Process NECESSARY CREDENTIALS 11 IS IT WORTH IT? 12 Challenges and Opportunities Of Presidential Appointments ADVOCACY & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 13 For Latino Candidates & Nominees 2021 NALEO | PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENTS PRIMER 3 BACKGROUND During the 1970’s and 1980’s, there were very few Latinos considered for appointments in the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vcf 20Th Anniversary Special Report
    20TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL REPORT September 2021 THE VCF 20TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL REPORT Message from Attorney General Merrick Garland ................................................................................................................1 Message from Special Master Rupa Bhattacharyya .......................................................................................................... 2 Timeline ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Reflections From Special Master Kenneth R. Feinberg and Camille S. Biros ....................................................4 Reaching Those Who Were There ............................................................................................................................................5-6 Reflections from Special Master Sheila Birnbaum ..............................................................................................................7 Reflections from Deputy Special Master Deborah Greenspan ..................................................................................8 VCF Website .................................................................................................................................................................................................9 VCF HelpLine ................................................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Drowning in Data 15 3
    BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES WITH AMERICANS’ DATA Rachel Levinson-Waldman Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law about the brennan center for justice The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution — part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group, part communications hub — the Brennan Center seeks meaningful, measurable change in the systems by which our nation is governed. about the brennan center’s liberty and national security program The Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program works to advance effective national security policies that respect Constitutional values and the rule of law, using innovative policy recommendations, litigation, and public advocacy. The program focuses on government transparency and accountability; domestic counterterrorism policies and their effects on privacy and First Amendment freedoms; detainee policy, including the detention, interrogation, and trial of terrorist suspects; and the need to safeguard our system of checks and balances. about the author Rachel Levinson-Waldman serves as Counsel to the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program, which seeks to advance effective national security policies that respect constitutional values and the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5492
    S5492 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE May 2, 2007 Mr. HARKIN. Yes, I have received a assurances of the chairman and the system. Small ‘‘p’’ politics, the imposition of good many calls as well. And, I have to ranking Republican on the committee. discretionary preferences, policies and prior- ities in the focus of prosecutorial discretion, say that I would be very concerned, as f I know the Senator from Utah is, if generally are proper. Partisans must accept MORNING BUSINESS them, like it or not. They are not the basis anything in the bill we are considering, for replacing attorneys general. S. 1082, would overturn DSHEA, a law Mr. MENENDEZ. Madam President, I The distinction is important. When the we fought side-by-side to see enacted. ask unanimous consent that there now Justice Department that I served in during Mr. ENZI. It might be helpful if I ex- be a period of morning business with the Kennedy administration came to office, plained the provision you are dis- Senators permitted to speak therein ‘‘political’’ priorities changed. The internal cussing, as my office has received for up to 10 minutes each. security division, active and robust during many calls as well and I believe the The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without the Eisenhower administration when loyalty callers are not informed about this objection, it is so ordered. was a major concern, was de-emphasized and eventually was deactivated. The organized matter. Subtitle B of title II of S. 1028 f crime and the civil rights sections, small and establishes the Reagan-Udall Founda- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE quiet in earlier years, grew into major cen- tion for the Food and Drug Administra- ters of departmental work and were the cen- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Says One Thing and Does Another on Criminal Justice by Lea Hunter, Ed Chung, and Akua Amaning
    FACT SHEET Trump Says One Thing and Does Another on Criminal Justice By Lea Hunter, Ed Chung, and Akua Amaning This factsheet contains an update. Note: An earlier version of this list appeared in American Progress’s Infographic: President Trump is Falsely Claiming He is a Criminal Justice Reformer. President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed ownership of criminal reform because he signed the FIRST STEP Act—a bipartisan federal sentencing and prison reform bill. A month after signing the bill, he proclaimed, “I did criminal justice reform, nobody else. I did it. Without me, you don’t have criminal justice reform.” In fall 2019, he again declared, “I did criminal justice reform, which President Obama could not get approved—which the media never talks about. If President Obama got criminal justice reform done, it would be front-page stories all over the place. I got it done.”1 But these claims fly in the face of nearly every action this administration has taken, most of which are antithetical to reform efforts. Too often, the full context of the Trump administration’s record on criminal jus- tice reform is obscured by celebrities visiting the White House and award ceremo- nies.2 However, behind the scenes, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regularly contravenes the efforts of the criminal justice reform movement. Collected here are a list of those anti-reform actions to date: 1. Restricted clemency to only those who are celebrities, well-connected individuals, or have a personal affiliation with the president3* 2. Encouraged the use of excessive police force on peaceful Black Lives Matter protestors4* 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Attorney General's Client?
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\87-3\NDL305.txt unknown Seq: 1 20-APR-12 11:03 WHO IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CLIENT? William R. Dailey, CSC* Two consecutive presidential administrations have been beset with controversies surrounding decision making in the Department of Justice, frequently arising from issues relating to the war on terrorism, but generally giving rise to accusations that the work of the Department is being unduly politicized. Much recent academic commentary has been devoted to analyzing and, typically, defending various more or less robust versions of “independence” in the Department generally and in the Attorney General in particular. This Article builds from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, in which the Court set forth key principles relating to the role of the President in seeing to it that the laws are faithfully executed. This Article draws upon these principles to construct a model for understanding the Attorney General’s role. Focusing on the question, “Who is the Attorney General’s client?”, the Article presumes that in the most important sense the American people are the Attorney General’s client. The Article argues, however, that that client relationship is necessarily a mediated one, with the most important mediat- ing force being the elected head of the executive branch, the President. The argument invokes historical considerations, epistemic concerns, and constitutional structure. Against a trend in recent commentary defending a robustly independent model of execu- tive branch lawyering rooted in the putative ability and obligation of executive branch lawyers to alight upon a “best view” of the law thought to have binding force even over plausible alternatives, the Article defends as legitimate and necessary a greater degree of presidential direction in the setting of legal policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Honesty Won't Aid Enemies; CIA INTERROGATION TACTICS
    Honesty won’t aid enemies; CIA INTERROGATION TACTICS The National Law Journal (Online) November 26, 2007 Monday Copyright 2007 ALM Media Properties, LLC All Rights Reserved Further duplication without permission is prohibited Length: 949 words Byline: Andrew Kent / Special to The National Law Journal, Special to the national law journal Body The Bush administration maintains that it cannot publicly discuss or even name the harsh interrogation techniques used by the CIA to break the silence of ″high value″ al-Queda captives like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who devised the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Recently, Michael Mukasey’s nomination to be attorney general ran into trouble when he declined senators’ requests for his opinion on the legality of waterboarding ? forced inhalation of water, causing choking and asphyxiation ? a technique reportedly used by the CIA on Mohammed and a few others. Mukasey was confirmed, but controversy about the CIA’s methods of interrogating al-Queda leadership, and the official secrecy about them, continues. The Bush administration and its supporters typically offer two reasons why the CIA’s interrogation methods must be secret. Neither is convincing. The principal justification is a variation on the tune the administration has played for years ? opposing us means aiding the enemy. The other justification is protecting CIA interrogators from potential liability. President Bush has repeated that the administration cannot discuss specific methods because ″it doesn’t make any sense to broadcast to the enemy what they ought to prepare for and not prepare for.″ As another official put it, the government cannot ″publicize to the enemy what practices may be on the table and what practices may be off the table.
    [Show full text]
  • Sen. Jeff Sessions's Record on Criminal Justice
    Analysis: Sen. Jeff Sessions’s Record on Criminal Justice By Ames C. Grawert This analysis provides a brief summary of Sen. Jeff Sessions’s past statements, votes, and practices relating to criminal justice. Specifically, this analysis finds that: • Sen. Sessions opposes efforts to reduce unnecessarily long federal prison sentences for nonviolent crimes, despite a consensus for reform even within his own party. In 2016, he personally blocked the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, a bipartisan effort spearheaded by Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and John Cornyn (R- Texas), and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), and supported by law enforcement leadership. As Attorney General, Sen. Sessions could stall current congressional efforts to pass this legislation to recalibrate federal sentencing laws. • Drug convictions made up 40 percent of Sen. Sessions’s convictions when he served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama — double the rate of other Alabama federal prosecutors. Today, state and federal law enforcement officers have begun to focus resources on violent crime, and away from archaic drug war policies. But Sen. Sessions continues to oppose any attempts to legalize marijuana and any reduction in drug sentences. As Attorney General, Sen. Sessions could direct federal prosecutors to pursue the harshest penalties possible for even low-level drug offenses, a step backward from Republican- supported efforts to modernize criminal justice policy. • Unlike many Republican legislators, Sen. Sessions supports the use of “civil asset forfeiture,” which allows police to confiscate property from people who may not even be accused of a crime.
    [Show full text]
  • DAMIEN GUEDES, Et Al., Applican
    App. No. ___ -------------------- In The Supreme Court of the United States -------------------- DAMIEN GUEDES, et al., Applicants-Appellants, v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, et al., Respondents-Appellees. -------------------- APPLICATION FOR STAY OF IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY REGULATION PENDING A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI -------------------- To the Honorable Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., as Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: Pursuant to this Court’s Rule 23 and the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651, the Applicants (Plaintiffs-Appellants below) Damien Guedes, Shane Roden, Firearms Policy Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Inc., Florida Carry, Inc., David Codrea, Scott Heuman, and Owen Monroe respectfully request that this Court stay the implementation and enforcement against them of Respondents’ Final Rule relating to the revised construction of the definition of “machinegun” and application of that definition to so-called “bump-stock-type devices,” 83 Fed. Reg. 66514, until the resolution of a forthcoming petition for writ of certiorari, and any subsequent proceedings, in this case. On April 1, 2019, the court of appeals issued its Opinion and Judgment in this expedited appeal, affirming (over vigorous dissent) the denial of a preliminary injunction. Opinion and Dissent, attached as Exhibit A; Judgment, attached as Exhibit B. The Judgment provided that the administrative stay of the effective date of the Bump Stock Rule, 83 Fed. Reg. 66,514 (Dec. 26, 2018), that was entered on the court’s own motion on March 23, 2019, will remain in effect for 48 hours from the time of the issuance of the opinion in this case to allow plaintiffs, if they wish, to seek a stay from the Supreme Court of the United States.
    [Show full text]