DOCSLIB.ORG

By Frank H. Waskey (1950) Kenneth L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
By Frank H. Waskey (1950) Kenneth L INTRODUCTION TO “TRIBAL DIVISIONS OF THE ESKIMO OF WESTERN ALASKA” BY FRANK H. WASKEY (1950) Kenneth L. Pratt Bureau of Indian Affairs, ANCSA Office, 3601 C Street, Suite 1100, Anchorage, AK 99503; [email protected] Several decades ago, while conducting research for a located his own copy of the manuscript and reproduced it study concerning Eskimo social groups in the Yukon- for me; in turn, I provided a copy to the APR. Kuskokwim region of southwest Alaska (Pratt 1984), I After reading it myself, I was convinced that Waskey’s came across a reference by Wendell Oswalt (1967) to an 1950 manuscript represented a significant contribution to unpublished manuscript by Frank H. Waskey (Fig. 1). the issue of historical Eskimo group boundaries in south- Unable to locate a copy of the manuscript through nor- west Alaska; it also contains some unique details about mal research channels, I contacted Oswalt (then profes- the region’s indigenous peoples. Its relative inaccessibil- sor of anthropology at the University of California at Los ity and potential value to future researchers is the basis Angeles) and requested his assistance. He suggested where for presenting the manuscript in its near-original form. the manuscript could likely be found and then generously Changes include the addition of maps to show the loca- explained how it came to be written and provided back- tions of selected places and groups mentioned. Bracketed ground information about its author. information has also been inserted to (1) better identify According to Oswalt (1983), who first learned of the places, groups, and landscape features mentioned; (2) clar- manuscript while enrolled as a student at the University of ify published sources alluded to by Waskey in the manu- Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in the early 1950s, Waskey was script; and (3) provide spellings of certain Native words a friend of Ivar Skarland—head of the UAF Department and names that correspond with accepted modern orthog- of Anthropology from 1946 until his death in January raphies (e.g., Jacobson 2012). Corrected spellings of such 1965. Aware of Waskey’s extensive knowledge of and ex- words and names appear in brackets following their first perience with the Eskimo peoples of southwestern Alaska, mention in the text. Endnotes are intended to place the Skarland encouraged him to write about the region’s work in context and clarify, explain, or elaborate on some Eskimo groups and their respective geographic bound- of the key information it contains. Waskey’s original capi- aries. Waskey complied with the request and sent the talization is generally retained, except where indicated. manuscript to Skarland upon completion. Since it was maintained in the Department of Anthropology’s files for BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF many years, Oswalt assumed it was probably still there— FRANK H. WASKEY but also believed he had a copy of the manuscript in his personal library. The manuscript was not found at either Frank Hinman Waskey was born on 20 April 1875 in Lake the UAF Department of Anthropology or the Alaska and City, Minnesota. Following a six-year stint (1892–1898) as Polar Regions Collections and Archives (APR) at UAF, a salesman in the Minneapolis area, Waskey journeyed to which had a file on Waskey. Fortunately, however, Oswalt Alaska in 1898 and prospected in the vicinity of Hope, on Alaska Journal of Anthropology vol. 10, nos. 1&2 (2012) 37 Figure 1. Frank H. Waskey, ca. 1907 (Alaska State Library, Portrait File, ASL-Waskey-2). Turnagain Arm of Cook Inlet, until 1900. For the next which he returned to Alaska and resumed his mining and thirty years he prospected and mined in numerous parts prospecting activities. of Alaska including Nome, Iditarod, Marshall (Fortuna In 1930, Waskey became the proprietor of a trad- Ledge), Quinhagak, and the Kuskokwim River region. ing post in the Bristol Bay community of Dillingham, He was a successful, early participant in the Nome gold a business he continued to operate until 1956 (Atwood rush of 1899–1900 and became a prominent businessman and DeArmond 1977:103–104). During that period he in that community. Waskey’s reputation as a man of “in- traveled extensively in southwest Alaska and became a dustry and native intelligence” (McCollom 1973:55) con- student of Alaska Native life, languages, and traditions. tributed to his selection as Alaska’s first delegate to the U.S. He was a fairly competent speaker of the Central Yup’ik Congress. He served as Alaska’s delegate in Washington, Eskimo language, according to fluent speaker Wassilie D.C., from December 1906 through March 1907, after Evan (Fienup-Riordan 1996:297; Oswalt 1983). Waskey 38 tribal divisions of the eskimo of western alaska Figure 2. Walrus mask collected by Waskey at the Yup’ik Eskimo village of Qissunaq in 1946. 19 cm high x 11.4 cm wide x 5.2 cm deep. Wood, root, natural paints (University of Alaska Museum of the North, Catalog No. UAM-0314- 4351; photograph by Barry McWayne). gathered a broad range of information from Native vil- larly consulted. He was also an important source of local lagers of the region. In 1946 he collected ten dance masks geographical names for surveyors of the U.S. Coast and (Fig. 2) and five “humorous masks”—one of which was a Geodetic Survey (USC&GS) and the U.S. Geological caricature of himself (Fig. 3)—at the village of Qissunaq Survey (USGS): this may account for a major mountain (Kashunuk); he later sold them to the University of Alaska in the Bristol Bay region being named in his honor (see Museum (Fienup-Riordan 1996:297–303). That Waskey Orth 1967:1030). was well-known to Native residents of the region is evi- In addition to his manuscript on Eskimo group denced by the fact that he is discussed in Yup’ik oral his- boundaries, Waskey’s wide-ranging interests resulted in tory accounts recorded up to thirty years after his death. an article written for the scientific community regard- Examples include comments about Waskey’s artifact pur- ing Alaska’s geology and its economic potential (Waskey chasing activities (Fienup-Riordan 1996:297–298; Post 1946). The “Frank H. Waskey Papers” are housed at 1984), his interest in mining and minerals (Smith 1988), APR in Fairbanks (Waskey 1919–1954); however, near- and his work as a trader (Sundown 1984; cf. Andrews ly all of the materials contained therein are photocop- 1989:84–85). People of the region also identified him by ies. The items with the most potential research value at least two different Yup’ik names: Neqyacagaq (“little are two handwritten “travel” diaries (91 and 115 pages fishy one”) and Uaskiq (Fienup-Riordan 1996:297–298), in length, respectively) which, for example, describe as- the latter of which is a Yup’ik rendering of “Waskey.” pects of the trading Waskey conducted with Native vil- Local prospectors and airplane pilots were another lagers. Unfortunately, the poor copy quality of the diaries source of information about the region who Waskey regu- makes much of Waskey’s writing difficult to decipher. It is Alaska Journal of Anthropology vol. 10, nos. 1&2 (2012) 39 Figure 3. Caricature mask of Frank Waskey. Collected by Waskey at the Yup’ik Eskimo village of Qissunaq in 1946. 19 cm high x 12 cm wide x 6 cm deep. Wood, natural paints (University of Alaska Museum, Catalog No. UAM-0314- 4356; photograph by Barry McWayne). unknown if his original diaries still exist and, if so, where ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS they are located. The small APR collection also includes several versions of a manuscript on Eskimo place names, a I thank Wendell H. Oswalt for initially bringing the number of Eskimo tales, an account of fossil sequoia finds Waskey manuscript to my attention and Robert M. in southwestern Alaska, descriptions of various rocks and Drozda and Erica Hill for review comments that were minerals, and assorted correspondence. helpful to my edit of the manuscript. I am also grateful to After retiring from his Dillingham business in 1956, Sandra Johnston of the Alaska State Library and Angela Waskey moved to Oakville, Washington, where he con- Linn of the University of Alaska Museum of the North tinued to trade in Alaska Native artifacts. He died on for assistance they provided with the photographs used in 26 January 1964 at the age of eighty-eight and was buried this paper. in Shelton, Washington. 40 tribal divisions of the eskimo of western alaska REFERENCES 1983 Letter to Ken Pratt dated 11 January. Author’s personal files, Anchorage. Andrews, Elizabeth F. Post, Peter 1989 The Akulmiut: Territorial Dimensions of a Yup’ik 1984 Oral history interview (Tape 84BAY049). Charles Eskimo Society. Technical Paper 177, Alaska De- Haecker, interviewer; Pauline Walter, interpreter. partment of Fish and Game, Subsistence Divi- 8 August; Tununak, Alaska. Bureau of Indian sion, Juneau. Affairs, ANCSA Office, Anchorage. Atwood, Evangeline, and Robert N. DeArmond Pratt, Kenneth L. 1977 Who’s Who in Alaska Politics: A Biographical Dic- 1984 Yukon-Kuskokwim Eskimos, Western Alaska: tionary of Alaskan Political Personalities, 1884– Inconsistencies in Group Identification. M.A. 1974. Binford & Mort, Portland. thesis, Department of Anthropology, Western Fienup-Riordan, Ann Washington University, Bellingham. 1996 The Living Tradition of Yup’ik Masks /Agayuliyara- Smith, Peter rput, Our Way of Making Prayer. University of 1988 Oral history interview (Tape 88NUN010). Rob- Washington Press, Seattle. ert Drozda, interviewer. 31 December; Anchor- Jacobson, Steven A. age. Bureau of Indian Affairs, ANCSA Office, 2012 Yup’ik Eskimo Dictionary, 2nd ed. Alaska Na- Anchorage. tive Language Center, University of Alaska Sundown, Teddy Fairbanks. 1984 Oral history interview (Tape 84VAK031). Jim McCollum, Pat Kurtz and Robert Waterworth, interviewers; 1973 Alaska’s First Delegates: Waskey and Cale.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kisaralik River
    KISARALIK RIVER A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ANALYSIS by the · . neritage Conservation & Recreation Service October 1979 Anchor an '. - .. ·.. :~ .• . ~~ ., ·. ARLIS .· .· Alaska Resources Uotary & Information Services AlM INTRODUCTION At the request of the Bureau of Land Management, the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service made an independent study of the resources of the Kisaralik River area to determine the river's suitability for designation as a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System. In the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (PL. 90-542) Congress stated: "It is hereby declareq to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which with their immediate envi:r:onments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations." Ibis study was made in compliance with ~he Act. An interagency field inspection was conducted of the Kisaralik River in July 1978. Participating in the inspection were: Bureau of Land Management U.s. Fish & Wildlife Service State of AI;aska, Division Heritage Conseravtion & of Parks Recreation Service The following analysis is largel~ based on information obtained during the interagency field inspection; the Kisaralik River Report of August 7-14, 1976, by BLM staff (unpublished); the BOR aerial reconaissance in 1977; and library materials. THE RIVER AND ITS SETTING ~eral Setting The 3,000-4,000 foot high Kuskokwim Mountains run from near the central Yukon River in a southwest direction to the Bering Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Tatshenshini River Ten Year Monitoring Report Prepared
    Tatshenshini River Ten Year Monitoring Report Prepared for: Yukon Parks Department of Environment Government of Yukon Whitehorse, Yukon Prepared by: Bruce K. Downie PRP Parks: Research & Planning Whitehorse, Yukon Purpose of the Report The Tatshenshini River was designated as a Canadian Heritage River in 2004. The Canadian Heritage River System requires regular monitoring of the natural, heritage and recreational values underpinning each designation. This report presents the results of the ten year review of the river values and key elements of the management strategies for the Yukon portion of the Tatshenshini watershed. The report also points out which characteristics and qualities of the designated river have been maintained as well as the activities and management actions that have been implemented to ensure the continued integrity of the river’s values. And, finally, the report also highlights issues that require further attention in order to maintain the heritage values of the designation. On the basis of these findings, the report assesses the designation status of the Tatshenshini River within the Canadian Heritage River System. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to the those individuals consulted through this analysis and especially to the dedicated individuals in Yukon and First Nations governments who continue to work towards the protection of the natural and cultural values and the wilderness recreational opportunities of the Tatshenshini River. Appreciation is also extended to Parks Canada and the Canadian Heritage Rivers Board Secretariat for their assistance and financial support of this review. All photos provided by: Government of Yukon ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRP Parks: Research & Planning - 2 - March, 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Wild and Scenic River Stu8y N .. + R-E~O--L
    Nf s 1-:: ~' { c" ~ 1 - final wild and scenic river stu8y N .. + R-e~o --L october 1982 ALASKA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FINAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER REPORT FOR THE MELOZITNA RIVER, ALASKA Pursuant to Section S(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Public Law 90-542, as amended, the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, has prepared a report for the Melozitna Wild and Scenic River Study. This report presents an evaluation and analysis of the Melozitna River and the finding that the river does not meet the criteria of eligibility for inclusion into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. A limited number of copies are available upon request to: Regional Director Alaska Regional Office National Park Service 2525 Gambell Street, Room 107 Anchorage, Alaska 99503-2892 (907) 271-4196 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet i Summary of Findings and Conclusions 1 Findings 1 Conclusions 1 Introduction 1 Purpose of Study 1 Conduct of Study 2 The Melozitna River Region 2 Location and Topography 2 Climate 4 Land Ownership 4 Land Use 6 Socioeconomic Conditions 6 Population Centers 6 Economy 7 Transportation and Access 7 The Melozitna River Study Area 8 Cultural Resources 8 Fish and Wildlife 9 Geology and Mineral Resources 10 Recreation 12 Scenic Resources 13 Stream Flow Characteristics and Water Quality 14 Water Resource Developments 16 Other Possible Actions 16 Consultation and Coordination of the Draft Report 17 Comments Received 18 Abbreviations ADF&G - Alaska Department of Fish and Game ANILCA - Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act BLM - Bureau of Land Management FWS - Fish and Wildlife Service NPS - National Park Service WSR - Wild and Scenic River F.
    [Show full text]
  • TH Best Practices for Heritage Resources
    Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Best Practices for HeritageHeading Resources Place your message here. For maximum impact, use two or three sentences. March 2011 Scope This manual provides the First Nation perspective on working with heritage resources in Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Traditional Territory. It is not intended as a legal document or to supplant any regulatory frameworks within the Yukon. This is not a comprehensive guide nor is it intended to be static. These best practices represent the best information and resources currently available. The Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Heritage Department consists of specialists in heritage sites, land-based heritage resources, language, traditional knowledge, and collections management. We are both capable and enthusiastic to work with industry to protect First Nation cultural heritage. It is the role of this department to represent and safeguard the heritage and culture of the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in. The Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Heritage Department has proven that working cooperatively with proponents of the mining, development, resource, and industrial sectors is mutually beneficial and assists everyone in meeting their goals. We welcome inquiries from all project proponents. Early collaboration facilitates proper management and protection of our heritage resources. Contact: Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Heritage Department PO Box 599 Dawson City, Yukon Y0B 1G0 Phone: (867) 993-7113 Fax: (867) 993-6553 Toll-Free: 1-877-993-3400 Cover Photo: Tro’chëk, 2004. 2 Table of Contents Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 4 Legislative Framework ………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Cultural Context …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Heritage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Protecting Heritage Resources …………………………………………………………………………… 10 Reporting …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 14 References: Useful Resources, Legislation, Policy, and Best Practices …………… 15 Cut stump recorded during a 2005 heritage Julia Morberg harvesting blueberries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Family Float Trip Down the Yukon River by John Morton
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 10, No. 39 • October 17, 2008 A family float trip down the Yukon River by John Morton the Yukon Quest. But it’s equally challenging when young kids are involved and you’re worried about making sure they’re having fun and are SAFE. This is a tall order when they’re inhaling mosquitoes, pad- dling through water as cold as ice with big hydraulics or camping in bear country. Our “wilderness” trip got a rocky start as we passed a sign below Whitehorse that cautioned about treated effluent being discharged into the river. Sev- eral miles below town we ran into a grocery cart stick- ing out of a muddy bar in a bend on the river. As we paddled across the 30-mile long Lake Lebarge, made famous by Robert Service’s poetic celebration of the Cremation of Sam McGee, we saw abundant signs of humans everywhere: tent sites, rusted cans, old cables, and broken glass. But gradually these modern archaeological arti- facts disappear as we get into dining on grayling and wild onions further down the river. Saxifrage, blue- Straight off the water to the telephone, Mika Morton, 11, bells, cinquefoil, wild sweet pea, and fleabane are flow- reconnects with civilization in Eagle after 700 miles on ering everywhere. Ravens stick their heads into the the Yukon River. Her sister Charly, 6, is not in such a holes of cliff and bank swallows to feed on nestlings rush. The Morton family made the 4-week wilderness and eggs. As we pass one of many spectacular cliffs trip from Whitehorse, Yukon Territory to Eagle, Alaska along the river, a pair of peregrine falcons double by canoe in June.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of Freeze-Up and Break-Up of the Yukon River At
    JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY OBSERVATIONS OF FREEZE-UP AND BREAK-UP OF THE YUKON R I V ERA T BE A V E R, ALASKA* By JOHN R. WILLIAMS (U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.) ABSTRACT. Observations of faU freeze-up and spring break-up, important to subarctic hydrology and to local economy, were made at the Yukon River town of Beaver, Alaska, September 1949 to June 1950. On October IS, witb river temperature at 0° C., the freezing together of floating ice crystals formed thin icc pans that gradually thickened. Falling river level and increasingly heavy icc concentration choked off all but main channels. On 2S October ice jammed downstream and produced a continuous ice cover and a temporary rise of about I m. at Beaver. After 26 October the river resumed its drop in level until April. Freeze-up appears governed by local channel, current and weather conditions and lacks systen1atic progression either upstream or downstream. Spring thaw beginning in late i>\pril tha\ved sno\\.' cover and weakened river ice. In early ~tay the river began to rise sl()\.vly, but at an increasing rate, untll 13 IVlay when ice ,vas nearly free frorn shore. On 14 :\rIay, after a risc of about 3 m. in 24 hours, the icc broke and moved downstream as the flood crest passed Beaver. Downstream progression of break-up is delayed by local ice jams, the chief cause of disastrous river floods, and is advanced hy early break-up of large tributaries. ZVSAMMENFASSUNG. Vom September bis Juni 1950 wurde bei del' am Yukon Fluss gelegenen Stadt Beaver in Alaska Beobachtungen tiber Zufrieren im Herbst und Auftauen im Frtihling dUlchgefUhrt, die von \Vichtigkeit fUr die subarktische Hydrnlogie und den iirtlichen \Vasserhaushalt sind.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbon Potential of the Lower Kuskokwim River Area, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Southwest Alaska
    August 14,1995 Price: $3.40 Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys PUBLIC-DATA FILE 95-28 HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA, YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, SOUTHWEST ALASKA by C.G. Mull, T.K. Bundtzen, and R.R. Reifenstuhl August 1995 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Fairbanks. Alaska 99709-3645 HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA, YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, SOUTHWEST ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Regional structure of the lower Kuskokwim River area SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY Napatuk Creek #I well Lithology Petrology Paleontology Thermal maturity Discussion of thermal maturity Drill stem tests Hydrocarbon source rock potential of Napatuk Creek well Discussion GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Reflection seismic surveys Gravity surveys Airborne magnetic surveys 1994 airborne magnetic survey HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OP THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA Reservoir rocks Hydrocarbon source rock potential SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES CITED APPENDIX #1 Petrographic analysis of 19 thinsections LIST OF FIGURES Pig. 1 Index map to the lower Kuskokwim River area showing area of 1994 airborne magnetic survey Fig. 2 Generalized geologic map of the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta area, modified from map by Kirschner, 1988. A-A'---line of cross section Pig. 3 Generalized cross section of Kuskokwim delta area, modified from section by C.M. Molenaar, Shell Oil Company, 1962. Fig. 4 Induction electrical log and gamma ray log of interbedded Cretaceous sandstones and shales at 7,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciation and the Physical, Chemical and Biological Limnology of Yukon ·Lakes
    i i © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1981 Cat. no. Fs 97-6/966 ISSN 0706-6457 Correct citation for this publication: Lindsey, C. C., K. Patalas, R. A. Bodaly, and C. P. Archibald. 1981. Glaciation and the physical, chemical and biological limnology of Yukon ·lakes. Can. Tech·. Rep. Fish. Aquat Sri. 966: v·i + 37 p. iii I TABLE OF CONTENTS .Iohle. Page g Temperature (temp) (°C) and oxygen (mg/L) profiles for lakes of the ABSTRACT/RESUME v Stewart, Takhini, Tatchun, Teslin, ·and White subdrainages of tile INTRODUCTION . 1 Yukon River drainage system 18 10 Water chemistry of lal~es of the Alsek, SOURCES AND METHODS 1 Liard, Peel, and Porcupine River drainage systems • . 19 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 11 Water chemistry of lakes of the Atlin, Physical Limnology Lewe~. Mandanna, Nordenskiold, Lake area 2 Pelly;·Big Salmon, and Little Maximum depth 2 Salmon subdrainages of the Yukon Elevation 2 River drainage system 20 Temperature . 2 12 Water chemistry of lakes of the Stewart, Chemical Limnology Takhini, Tatchun, Teslin, and White Total dissolved solids (TDS) 2 subdrainages of the Yukon River Major ions, chlorophyll a, and Secchi 2 drainage system 21 disc visibility • 13 Absolute abundance of crustaceans, Oxygen content . 2 rotifers. and total zooplankton Glaciological Background 2 (crustaceans plus rotifers) and Zooplankton Abundance and Distribution 3 relative abundance (% by number) Glacial History and Fish Distributions 4 of crustacean species for lakes Alsek and White River drainages 4 of the Alsek, Liard, Peel and Por- Yukon River drainages 4 cupine River drainage systems 22 Liard River drainages . 6 14 Absolute abundance of crustaceans, Peel and Porcupine River drainages 6 rotifers, and total zooplankton (crustaceans plus rotifers) and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 7 relative abundance (% by number) of crustacean species for lakes REFERENCES 8 of the Atlin, Lewes, Mandanna, Nordenskiold, Pelly, Big Salmon, and Little Salmon subdrainages of the Yukon River drainage LIST OF TABLES system .
    [Show full text]
  • Special Publication No. BOF 2018-06
    Special Publication No. BOF 2018-06 Overview of the Development and Implementation of the Kuskokwim River Household Subsistence King Salmon Permit System, 2018 by David M. Runfola Christopher R. McDevitt and Caroline L. Brown December 2018 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in Division of Subsistence reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figures or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, deciliter dL all commonly-accepted symbols and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to ≥ mile mi Company Co. harvest per unit effort HPUE nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon River Basin Study Project Report
    YUKON RIVER BASIN STUDY PROJECT REPORT: WILDLIFE NO. 1 FURBEARER INVENTORY, HABITAT ASSESSMENT AND TRAPPER UTILIZATION OF THE YUKON RIVER BASIN B.G. Slough and R.H. Jessup Wildlife Management Branch Yukon Department of Renewable Resources Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 January 1984 i This report was funded by the Yukon River Basin Committee (jointly with Yukon Department of Renewable Resources) under the terms of "An Agreement Respecting Studies and Planning of Water Resources in the Yukon River Basin" between Canada, British Columbia and Yukon. The views, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Yukon River Basin Committee or the Government of Canada, British Columbia and Yukon. ii ABSTRACT The Yukon Department of Renewable Resources conducted furbearer inventory studies in the Canadian Yukon River Basin in 1982 and 1983. Field studies included beaver (Castor canadensis) food cache and colony site surveys, winter track-count sampling and muskrat (Ondatra zibethica) pushup surveys. Data from the surveys were analyzed in conjunction with ongoing trapper questionnaire and historical fur harvest data sources to characterize furbearer population distributions, levels, trends and habitats. Historical and present fur harvest and trapping activity are described. The fur resource capability and problems and issues associated with impacts on furbearer populations, habitats and user groups are discussed. The populations of wolves Canis lupus, red fox Vulpes fulva, coyote .Q..:.. latrans, red squirre 1 Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, wease 1 Mustela erminea, marten Martes americana, mink Mustela vison, otter Lutra canadensis, wolverine Gulo luscus, beaver, muskrat and lynx Lynx canadensis are all widely distributed within the Yukon River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared By: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 In
    Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared by: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 Introduction With a substantial population of Native people residing in their traditional homeland and living a modern traditional lifestyle, the Yukon Flats Refuge and all of the Alaskan Interior is a dynamic and living cultural landscape. The land, people, and wildlife form a tight, interrelated web of relationships extending thousands of years into the past. Natural features and human created “sites” form a landscape of meaning to the modern residents. The places and their meanings are highly relevant to modern residents, not just for people and culture but for the land. To many Gwich’in people culture is not distinct from their homeland. Although only minimally discussed in this overview, this dynamic living cultural landscape should be considered and discussed when writing about this area. Environmental Setting Containing the largest interior basin in Alaska, the Yukon Flats Refuge encompasses over 11 million acres of land in east central Alaska. Extending roughly 220 miles east-west along the Arctic Circle, the refuge lies between the Brooks Range to the north, and the White-Crazy Mountains to the south. The pipeline corridor runs along the refuge’s western boundary while the eastern boundary extends within 30 miles of the Canadian border. The Yukon River bisects the refuge, creating the dominant terrain. As many as 40,000 lakes, ponds, and streams may occur on the refuge, most concentrated in the flood plain along the Yukon and other rivers. Upland terrain, where lakes are less abundant, is the source of important drainage systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon Watersheds Map and Descriptions
    Water for Nature, Water for People YUKON WATER FACT SHEET Left: North Slope tundra and wetlands, Yukon Yukon Watersheds Map and PUBLISHED: JUNE 2014 Descriptions Water Resources Branch Department of Environment Six major watersheds drain the territory, each with several tributaries: the Alsek, Government of Yukon Yukon, Porcupine (which drains to the Yukon River in Alaska), Peel (which drains to the Mackenzie Delta), Liard (which drains to the Mackenzie Basin through Phone: 867-667-3171 Web: YukonWater.ca British Columbia, Alberta and the Northwest Territories), and North Slope. Email: [email protected] These watersheds make up the six water management areas identified in the Waters Regulation and used by the Yukon Water Board when issuing water licences. 1 Water for Nature, Water for People YUKON WATER FACT SHEET City of Whitehorse, and Yukon River Yukon River Basin (including the Alsek River Basin Porcupine River Basin) The Alsek River drains the southwestern portion of the Yukon to the Pacific Ocean. It is classified as a The Yukon River Headwaters contains the Southern Canadian Heritage River because of its significant Lakes region of Yukon and Northern British Columbia; natural resources: massive ice fields, high mountain there are glaciers throughout the mountains of these peaks, unique geologic history, coastal and interior headwaters. The Teslin River joins the Yukon River plant communities, significant grizzly bear population, north of Lake Laberge, contributing water mainly from and diverse bird species. snowmelt runoff in the upper portions of the basin. The Pelly and Stewart Rivers drain the eastern portion of the drainage, including mountainous terrain.
    [Show full text]