DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2007.08496V4 [Astro-Ph.CO] 19 Apr 2021 Eters of Our Universe Are Represented by High-Dimensional Bayesian Probability Distributions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2007.08496V4 [Astro-Ph.CO] 19 Apr 2021 Eters of Our Universe Are Represented by High-Dimensional Bayesian Probability Distributions Quantifying the global parameter tensions between ACT, SPT and Planck Will Handley1, 2, 3, ∗ and Pablo Lemos4, y 1Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, J.J.Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK 2Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 3Gonville & Caius College, Trinity Street, Cambridge, CB2 1TA, UKz 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK (Dated: Submitted 16th July 2020) The overall cosmological parameter tension between the Atacama Cosmology Telescope 2020 fourth data release (ACT) and Planck 2018 data within the concordance cosmological model is quantified using the Suspiciousness statistic to be 2:6σ. Between ACT and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) we find a tension of 2:4σ, and 2:8σ between ACT and Planck+SPT combined. While it is unclear whether the tension is caused by statistical fluctuations, systematic effects or new physics, caution should be exercised in combining these cosmic microwave background datasets in the context of the ΛCDM standard model of the universe. INTRODUCTION the primordial power spectrum ns are mildly discrepant, but it is always possible in a high dimensional parameter As cosmological datasets increase in quantity and qual- space that such discrepancies occur by chance and are ity, so does our capacity to use them to pin down the unremarkable. properties of our universe [1]. The error bars on the In this letter we discuss how this tension is quan- measurements of cosmological parameters have narrowed tified rigorously using the global Suspiciousness statis- over recent years and discrepancies between datasets (or tic [18, henceforth H19], and find that ACT is in mild- \tensions") have begun to emerge. Whilst this is most to-moderate tension with Planck and SPT, at a similar stark when examining differing observations of the Hub- or greater level to that found in weak lensing data. We ble parameter between early and late time cosmological place ACT's own global tension analysis in the context of probes [2{4], other more minor tensions arguably exist in the tensions literature, and extend it by considering SPT clustering parameters between weak lensing and the cos- data and further emphasise the perils of focussing too mic microwave background (CMB) [5, 6] and in cosmic closely on lower-dimensional views onto the cosmological curvature between the CMB and CMB lensing/Baryon constraints. Acoustic Oscillations [7{9]. When a substantial tension occurs, it may indicate METHODOLOGY either a systematic error in how either or both of the datasets have been gathered and analysed, or more ex- citingly may hint at evidence for new physics if extensions Quantifying tension between high dimensional poste- or modifications to our concordance model can bring the rior distributions is a non-trivial problem, even under the inferred parameters back into alignment. approximation of a Gaussian distribution. This has led In the case of the \Hubble tension" where a single ob- to a large number of papers describing methods to quan- vious cosmological parameter such as the present day ex- tify tension in high dimensional problems [for reviews, see 10, 11]. Working in a Bayesian framework, as most pansion rate H0 is discrepant by ∼ 5σ, there is little doubt that something is fundamentally wrong. The other cosmological analyses do, arguably the most natural way tensions are more subtle, in that they are only visible in to quantify tension is using the Bayes Ratio [19], defined complicated combinations of the parameters. As shown as the ratio of the probability that the two datasets are by Fig. 1, in modern cosmology, error bars on the param- described by a single set of parameters, to the probability that they are described by separate sets of parameters arXiv:2007.08496v4 [astro-ph.CO] 19 Apr 2021 eters of our universe are represented by high-dimensional Bayesian probability distributions. Visualising a \dis- P (A; B) ZAB tance" between these degrees of belief is challenging, and R = = ; (1) P (A)P (B) ZAZB in recent years a good deal of theory has been developed for defining a variety of metrics of discrepancy [10, 11]. where P represent a probability, we have omitted the de- The latest Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) data pendence of both probabilities on an underlying model, release 4 [12{14] represents the most recently acquired such as ΛCDM, and Z is the Bayesian Evidence. Fur- CMB data, with two other measurements of the CMB thermore, we have assumed that both data sets are in- power spectrum across a wide range of multipoles being dependent, an assumption that we further comment on provided by the Planck satellite [15, 16], and the South later. High values of R correspond to concordance, and Pole Telescope (SPT) [17]. By eye it is clear that in the low values are indicative of discordance, with R often in- ACT data some parameters such as the spectral tilt of terpreted on a Jeffreys’ scale [20, 21]. The main issue of 2 this tension metric, in particular for the analysis of cos- and covariance µ and Σ, then the Suspiciousness is: mological data sets, is that it is easily proven that R is d χ2 proportional to the prior volume of shared parameters. log S = − ; (5) 2 2 Therefore, R cannot be used for analyses that use delib- 2 −1 erately flat and wide uninformative priors, such as the χ = (µA − µB)(ΣA + ΣB) (µA − µB): (6) analyses of Planck, Dark Energy Survey [DES, 21], Kilo This may be turned into a tension probability via the Degree Survey [KiDS, 6], ACT, SPT, etc. without the ar- survival function of the chi-squared distribution bitrary width of this prior affecting tension assessment. 1 A more detailed interpretation of this discussion can be Z xd=2−1e−x=2 p = dx; (7) found in H19. 2d=2Γ(d=2) 2 Motivated by this, H19 defined a new statistic, the χ Suspiciousness which keeps all the desired properties and calibrated using a σ-tension by analogy with the of Eq. (1), but corrects for this undesired dependence Gaussian case using the inverse of the complementary on the prior volume. To do so, we divide the Bayes Ra- error function: p tio in two components: Information and Suspiciousness. σ(p) = 2erfc−1(1 − p): (8) The Information is defined as: Note that, while several methods to quantify tension have been proposed in recent years, they are often built to log I = DA + DB − DAB; (2) recover Eq. (7) and Eq. (8) in the case of Gaussian poste- where D is the Kullback-Leibler divergence [22]. The rior distributions. Therefore, if this work were performed Information contains the dependence on the prior vol- using tension metrics such as Monte-Carlo Parameter ume, therefore by removing it, we obtain a statistic Shifts [26], Parameter Shifts in Update Form [27], or that does not depend on it, but is composed of well- EigenTension [28], we would expect to obtain very simi- defined Bayesian and information theoretic quantities lar, if not the same results, under the Gaussian approx- and is therefore covariantly insensitive to reparameterisa- imation used in this work. This is also equivalent to tion of the space. Therefore, we define the Suspiciousness the multivariate measure of tension used in the ACT pa- as: per [12]. It should be noted that alternative measures of tension R have also been defined and explored that are specialised S = : (3) I for the case when two datasets are correlated [26, 29]. In particular, [23] extended the formalism described in In the language of priors, the Suspiciousness may be in- this section to the case of correlated data sets. Applying terpreted as the most cautious Bayes Ratio R correspond- this to the case of CMB datasets such as Planck, ACT, ing to the narrowest possible priors that do not signifi- SPT and WMAP (which are correlated by virtue of their cantly alter the shape of the posteriors [23]. measuring the same sky) will form the subject of a future A significant innovation to the field which we highlight paper. here, first noted in the appendix F.3 of [24] and explored DATA in detail in [25] is that since log Z = hlog LiP − D, the suspiciousness can be computed from MCMC chains via In this work we analyse the three latest CMB data sets, Planck, SPT and ACT. As with all cosmological analyses, log S = hlog LABiPAB − hlog LAiPA − hlog LBiPB : (4) when considering combining or comparing them at the likelihood level we implicitly assume that the datasets are This observation means that so long as one has pos- independent, even though this may not strictly true. Ex- terior samples for each of the datasets run separately amining the effect of relaxing this assumption will form and in combination, one may compute the suspicious- the subject of future work. It should also be noted that ness without explicitly computing the Bayesian evidence. the prior treatment for τ is different across the three col- However, it should be noted that in non-CMB applica- laborations, one of the aims of future work will be to treat tions only a portion of the parameters are constrained, this in a consistent manner for all three cases. The ACT resulting in hypersurface-like posteriors which are ex- analysis uses a CMB-derived prior for τ, so there is cor- tremely challenging for traditional posterior samplers, relation between posteriors for the τ parameter. A more but present little challenge for nested samplers. complete analysis could adjust the tension in either direc- If the posteriors are such that we may approximate tion, since correlations in τ act to reduce the dimensional- them in the cosmological parameters by a Gaussian (an ity to less than d = 6, increasing the tension [18, 29, 30], approximation which is reasonably justified as shown by but since τ is a degeneracy-breaking parameter it can Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AAO of the FUTURE AAO of Next Generation Fibre Positioning Robots
    IAU SPECIAL EDITION JULY 2003 NEWSLETTER ANGLO-AUSTRALIAN OBSERVATORY AAO OF THE FUTURE Next generation fibre positioning robots. Microrobotic technology based on the AAO’s Echidna system allows accurate positioning of payloads such as single fibres, guide bundles, mini- IFUs or even pick-off mirrors to be accurately positioned on large focal plates for large and ‘extremely large’ telescopes. See article on page 18. contents 3The Anglo-Australian Planet Search finDs a new “Solar System”-like gas giant (Chris Tinney et al.) 4RAVE hits the galaxy (FreD Watson et al.) 8A search for the highest reDshift raDio galaxies (Carlos De Breuck et al.) 9The 6DF Galaxy Survey (Will SaunDers et al.) 14 The end of observations for the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (Matthew Colless et al.) 18 Directions for future instrumentation Development by the AAO (AnDrew McGrath et al.) 20 AAΩ: the successor to 2dF (Terry Bridges et al.) DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE DIRECTOR’S DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE On behalf of the staff of the Anglo-Australian Observatory, I would like to extend a warm welcome to Sydney to all IAU General Assembly delegates. This special GA edition of the AAO newsletter showcases some of the AAO’s achievements over the past year as well as some exciting new directions in which the AAO is heading in the future. Over the past few years the AAO has increasingly sought to build on its scientific and technical expertise through the design and building of astronomical instrumentation for overseas observatories, whilst maintaining its own telescopes as world-class facilities. The success of science programs such as the Anglo-Australian Planet Search and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey amply demonstrate that the AAO is still facilitating the production of outstanding science by its user communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Peter Goldreich Member of the Board of Adjudicators Chairman of the Selection Committee for the Prize in Astronomy
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have recently achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in academic and scientific research or applications, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity’s spiritual civilization. Preference is to be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved and who are currently active in their respective fields. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw. Mr Shaw, born in China in 1907, was a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother’s film company in China in the 1920s. During the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (HK) Limited in Hong Kong. He was one of the founding members of Television Broadcasts Limited launched in Hong Kong in 1967. Mr Shaw also founded two charities, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong and The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive I warmly congratulate the six Shaw Laureates of 2014. Established in 2002 under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw, the Shaw Prize is a highly prestigious recognition of the role that scientists play in shaping the development of a modern world. Since the first award in 2004, 54 leading international scientists have been honoured for their ground-breaking discoveries which have expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and made significant contributions to humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding the Radiation from the Big Bang
    Finding The Radiation from the Big Bang P. J. E. Peebles and R. B. Partridge January 9, 2007 4. Preface 6. Chapter 1. Introduction 13. Chapter 2. A guide to cosmology 14. The expanding universe 19. The thermal cosmic microwave background radiation 21. What is the universe made of? 26. Chapter 3. Origins of the Cosmology of 1960 27. Nucleosynthesis in a hot big bang 32. Nucleosynthesis in alternative cosmologies 36. Thermal radiation from a bouncing universe 37. Detecting the cosmic microwave background radiation 44. Cosmology in 1960 52. Chapter 4. Cosmology in the 1960s 53. David Hogg: Early Low-Noise and Related Studies at Bell Lab- oratories, Holmdel, N.J. 57. Nick Woolf: Conversations with Dicke 59. George Field: Cyanogen and the CMBR 62. Pat Thaddeus 63. Don Osterbrock: The Helium Content of the Universe 70. Igor Novikov: Cosmology in the Soviet Union in the 1960s 78. Andrei Doroshkevich: Cosmology in the Sixties 1 80. Rashid Sunyaev 81. Arno Penzias: Encountering Cosmology 95. Bob Wilson: Two Astronomical Discoveries 114. Bernard F. Burke: Radio astronomy from first contacts to the CMBR 122. Kenneth C. Turner: Spreading the Word — or How the News Went From Princeton to Holmdel 123. Jim Peebles: How I Learned Physical Cosmology 136. David T. Wilkinson: Measuring the Cosmic Microwave Back- ground Radiation 144. Peter Roll: Recollections of the Second Measurement of the CMBR at Princeton University in 1965 153. Bob Wagoner: An Initial Impact of the CMBR on Nucleosyn- thesis in Big and Little Bangs 157. Martin Rees: Advances in Cosmology and Relativistic Astro- physics 163.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Cosmology 3
    IL NUOVO CIMENTO Vol. ?, N. ? ? The Future of Cosmology George Efstathiou Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHA. England. Summary. — This article is the written version of the closing talk presented at the conference ‘A Century of Cosmology’ held at San Servolo, Italy, in August 2007. I focus on the prospects of constraining fundamental physics from cosmological observations, using the search for gravitational waves from inflation and constraints on the equation of state of dark energy as topical examples. I argue that it is important to strike a balance between the importance of a scientific discovery against the likelihood of making the discovery in the first place. Astronomers should be wary of embarking on large observational projects with narrow and speculative scientific goals. We should maintain a diverse range of research programmes as we move into a second century of cosmology. If we do so, discoveries that will reshape fundamental physics will surely come. 1. – Introduction It is a privilege to be invited to give the closing talk at this meeting celebrating ‘A Century of Cosmology’. I have taken the liberty of changing the title of the written version to make it shorter and snappier. Of course, I will not be able to cover all of arXiv:0712.1513v2 [astro-ph] 4 Jan 2008 cosmology and I am not a clairvoyant. What I will try to do is to review a small number of topics and use them as a guide to how our subject might develop. I am told that a good high court judge leaves everybody in the courtroom dissatisfied.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE FULL NAME: George Petros EFSTATHIOU NATIONALITY: British DATE OF BIRTH: 2nd Sept 1955 QUALIFICATIONS Dates Academic Institution Degree 10/73 to 7/76 Keble College, Oxford. B.A. in Physics 10/76 to 9/79 Department of Physics, Ph.D. in Astronomy Durham University EMPLOYMENT Dates Academic Institution Position 10/79 to 9/80 Astronomy Department, Postdoctoral Research Assistant University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A. 10/80 to 9/84 Institute of Astronomy, Postdoctoral Research Assistant Cambridge. 10/84 to 9/87 Institute of Astronomy, Senior Assistant in Research Cambridge. 10/87 to 9/88 Institute of Astronomy, Assistant Director of Research Cambridge. 10/88 to 9/97 Department of Physics, Savilian Professor of Astronomy Oxford. 10/88 to 9/94 Department of Physics, Head of Astrophysics Oxford. 10/97 to present Institute of Astronomy, Professor of Astrophysics (1909) Cambridge. 10/04 to 9/08 Institute of Astronomy, Director Cambridge. 10/08 to present Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Director Cambridge. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Fellow of the Royal Society since 1994 Fellow of the Instite of Physics since 1995 Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society 1983-2010 Member of the International Astronomical Union since 1986 Associate of the Canadian Institute of Advanced Research since 1986 1 AWARDS/Fellowships/Major Lectures 1973 Exhibition Keble College Oxford. 1975 Johnson Memorial Prize University of Oxford. 1977 McGraw-Hill Research Prize University of Durham. 1980 Junior Research Fellowship King’s College, Cambridge. 1984 Senior Research Fellowship King’s College, Cambridge. 1990 Maxwell Medal & Prize Institute of Physics. 1990 Vainu Bappu Prize Astronomical Society of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review
    Year in review For the year ended 31 March 2017 Trustees2 Executive Director YEAR IN REVIEW The Trustees of the Society are the members Dr Julie Maxton of its Council, who are elected by and from Registered address the Fellowship. Council is chaired by the 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace President of the Society. During 2016/17, London SW1Y 5AG the members of Council were as follows: royalsociety.org President Sir Venki Ramakrishnan Registered Charity Number 207043 Treasurer Professor Anthony Cheetham The Royal Society’s Trustees’ report and Physical Secretary financial statements for the year ended Professor Alexander Halliday 31 March 2017 can be found at: Foreign Secretary royalsociety.org/about-us/funding- Professor Richard Catlow** finances/financial-statements Sir Martyn Poliakoff* Biological Secretary Sir John Skehel Members of Council Professor Gillian Bates** Professor Jean Beggs** Professor Andrea Brand* Sir Keith Burnett Professor Eleanor Campbell** Professor Michael Cates* Professor George Efstathiou Professor Brian Foster Professor Russell Foster** Professor Uta Frith Professor Joanna Haigh Dame Wendy Hall* Dr Hermann Hauser Professor Angela McLean* Dame Georgina Mace* Dame Bridget Ogilvie** Dame Carol Robinson** Dame Nancy Rothwell* Professor Stephen Sparks Professor Ian Stewart Dame Janet Thornton Professor Cheryll Tickle Sir Richard Treisman Professor Simon White * Retired 30 November 2016 ** Appointed 30 November 2016 Cover image Dancing with stars by Imre Potyó, Hungary, capturing the courtship dance of the Danube mayfly (Ephoron virgo). YEAR IN REVIEW 3 Contents President’s foreword .................................. 4 Executive Director’s report .............................. 5 Year in review ...................................... 6 Promoting science and its benefits ...................... 7 Recognising excellence in science ......................21 Supporting outstanding science .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Receives $500000 Gruber Cosmology Prize For
    US Media Contact: Foundation Contact: Cassandra Oryl Bernetia Akin +1 (202) 309-2263 +1 (340) 775-4430 [email protected] [email protected] Online Newsroom: www.gruberprizes.org/Press.php FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE "Gang of Four" Receives $500,000 Gruber Cosmology Prize for Reconstructing How the Universe Grew June 1, 2011, New York, NY –Four astronomers who found a way to recreate the growth of the universe are the recipients of the 2011 Cosmology Prize of The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation. Marc Davis, a professor in the Departments of Astronomy and Physics at the University of California at Berkeley; George Efstathiou, the director of the Kavli Institute for Cosmology in Cambridge; Carlos Frenk, the director of the Institute for Computational Cosmology at Durham University; and Simon White, a director of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching, Germany, will share the $500,000 award. Marc Davis George Efstathiou Carlos Frenk Simon White The official citation recognizes the astronomers—nicknamed the “Gang of Four” by their colleagues and often collectively abbreviated as DEFW—for “their pioneering use of numerical simulations to model and interpret the large-scale distribution of matter in the Universe.” The Gruber Prize recognizes both the discovery method that DEFW introduced as well as the collaboration’s subsequent discoveries. Davis, Efstathiou, Frenk, and White will each receive an equal share of the award, along with a gold medal, at a ceremony this fall. They will also deliver a lecture. Astronomers have always told us what the universe looks like. Theorists have always invented ideas as to how it came to look that way.
    [Show full text]
  • TMCC2021: Schedule!
    TMCC2021: Schedule! Tehran Time !! CET Monday 22 Feb. Tuesday 23 Feb. Wednesday 24 Feb. Thursday 25 Feb. 16:30 — 17:00 14:00 — 14:30 Riess Sarkar Silk CONTRIBUTED 10 Q&A Q&A Q&A T1-session 17:15 — 17:45 14:45 — 15:15 Efstathiou Kroupa Di Valentino CONTRIBUTED 10 Q&A Q&A Q&A T2-session 30 18:30 — 19:00 16:00 — 16:30 Freedman Mueller Ali-Haimoud Starkman 10 Q&A Q&A Q&A Q&A 19:15 — 19:45 16:45 — 17:15 Wandelt Asgari CONTRIBUTED CONTRIBUTED 10 Q&A Q&A W-session T3-session 30 20:30 — 21:00 18:00 — 18:30 Javanmardi Amon Hill Pogosian 10 Q&A Q&A Q&A Q&A 21:15 — 21:45 18:45 — 19:15 Kaiser Bond Hudson Knox 10 Q&A Q&A Q&A Q&A Invited Speakers (alphabetical order): • Yacine Ali-Haïmoud: Cosmology from the CMB frequency spectrum • Alexandra Amon: The status of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmology analysis • Marika Asgari: KiDS-1000: Cosmology with the Kilo Degree Survey • J. Richard Bond: Cosmic Power from CMB and LSS �_8-fluctuation Probes • Eleonora Di Valentino: Investigating cosmic discordances • George Efstathiou: An update on cosmological constraints from Planck • Wendy Freedman: Local Measurements of H0: Is There a Crisis in Cosmology? • J. Colin Hill: Exploring Cosmological Concordance with ACT DR4, Planck, and Beyond • Michael J. Hudson: Cosmic flows crank up the tension in cosmology • Behnam Javanmardi: Inspecting The Cosmic Distance Ladder • Nicholas Kaiser: Gravitational Lensing and Cosmological Parameter Estimation • Lloyd Knox: Can Additional Light Relics Restore Cosmic Concordance? • Pavel Kroupa: From beauty to realism: the observed
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophysics and Cosmology
    Copyright of the works in this eBook is vested with World Scientific Publishing. The following eBook is allowed for Solvay Institutes website use only and may not be resold, copied, further disseminated, or hosted on any other third party website or repository without the copyright holders' written permission. http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/9953 For any queries, please contact [email protected]. ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH SOLVAY CONFERENCE ON PHYSICS http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/9953 ©World Scientific Publishing Company. For post on Solvay Institutes website only. No further distribution is allowed. 9953_9789814759175_tp.indd 1 8/3/16 4:58 PM December 12, 2014 15:40 BC: 9334 { Bose, Spin and Fermi Systems 9334-book9x6 page 2 This page intentionally left blank ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH SOLVAY CONFERENCE ON PHYSICS http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/9953 ©World Scientific Publishing Company. For post on Solvay Institutes website only. No further distribution is allowed. ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH SOLVAY CONFERENCE ON PHYSICS http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/9953 ©World Scientific Publishing Company. For post on Solvay Institutes website only. No further distribution is allowed. 9953_9789814759175_tp.indd 2 8/3/16 4:58 PM Published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009
    King’s College, Cambridge Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009 Contents The Provost 2 The Fellowship 7 Undergraduates at King’s 18 Graduates at King’s 24 Tutorial 26 Research 32 Library 35 Chapel 38 Choir 41 Staff 43 Development 46 Members’ Information Form 51 Obituaries 55 Information for Members 259 The first and most obvious to the blinking, exploring, eye is buildings. If The Provost you go to the far side of the Market Place and look back, you now see three tall buildings: Great St Mary’s, King’s Chapel, and a taller Market Hostel. First spiky scaffolding reached above the original roof. Now it has all been shrouded in polythene, like a mystery shop window offering. It’ll stay 2 Things could only get better. You wrapped for a year until the major refit is completed next summer. 3 may remember that when I wrote THE PROVOST these notes last year, I had just Moving back into the main college in my exploratory perambulation, I find discovered that the College had more scaffolding. It’s on the Wilkins Screen. It’s on the Chapel, where through written to the local authorities THE PROVOST the summer we’ve moved down the entire South side, cleaning and treating saying that they were unaware of the glazing bars so that they no longer rust, expand, and prise off bits of the my place of residence. The College stone. Face lifts for the fountain and founder’s statue. So I see much activity, did not know where I was and I expensive activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Andy Parker George Efstathiou Cavendish Laboratory Institute of Astronomy  This Is a 16 Lecture Part III Minor Option
    Andy Parker George Efstathiou Cavendish Laboratory Institute of Astronomy This is a 16 lecture Part III Minor Option. Tuesdays and Thursdays 10 am Textbooks: Perkins – “Particle Astrophysics” Bergstrom and Goobar – “Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics” Mukhnaov – “The Physical Foundations of Cosmology” Kolb and Turner – “The Early Universe” Tully – “Elementary Particle Physics in a Nutshell” This is a fast moving field, and we will not follow any textbook very closely. 1/16/13 Astroparticle 2 Astroparticle physics links the observations from astrophysical sources to our measurements of sub-nuclear particles in laboratories. This offers a way to test hypotheses about physics taking place in regions of the Universe we can never reach (and which may not even exist any more). This use of data is what makes cosmology a science, and not pure speculation. Two historical examples… 1/16/13 Astroparticle 3 On the subject of stars, …We shall never be able by any means to study their chemical composition. ! ! !! !August Comte 1835 !! Solar spectrum – Kitt Peak! ζ Puppis – ionized He! ε Orionis – neutral He! Sirius - hydrogen! Inferred from lab measurements of Canopus – calcium! spectra from elements! Annals of the Harvard College Observatory, vol. 23, 1901.! Mira – Titanium Oxide! 1/16/13 Astroparticle 4 BB produces hydrogen and helium from quark-gluon plasma – decay of free neutrons leaves excess of H. e! Weak force νe! allows hydrogen to W! “burn” into Helium! n! p! 5 1/16/13 Astroparticle 5 He+p -> 5Li – highly unstable He+He-> 8Be – decays back to 2 α with lifetime of 0.97 x 10-16 s Path to heavier nuclei appears to be blocked! In stars, density is high enough for 8Be + 4He -> 12C** …but rate should be very low.
    [Show full text]
  • Radial Velocity with Respect to the Local (Observer) Frame
    Durham E-Theses Large scale structure in the Durham/UKST galaxy Redshift survey Ratclie, Andrew How to cite: Ratclie, Andrew (1996) Large scale structure in the Durham/UKST galaxy Redshift survey, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5345/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Large Scale Structure in the .3urham/UKST Galaxy Redshift Survey Andrew Ratcliffe A thesis submitted to the University of Durham in accordance with the regulations for admittance to the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Department of Physics University of Durham March 1996 3 I OCT 1996 Abstract The initial results from the Durham/UKST Galaxy Redshift Survey are pre• sented here.
    [Show full text]