The Collaboration of B. Henry Latrobe And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OPEN: 108th ACSA Annual Meetng 1 The Collaboraton of B. Henry Latrobe and Giuseppe Franzoni to Create the Naton’s First Statue of Liberty (1807-1814) RICHARD CHENOWETH AIA Mississippi State University Keywords: Latrobe, Statue of Liberty, U.S. Capitol, known as the House chamber in the South Wing of the Capitol; Washington DC. today, the site of the Natonal Statuary Hall). Architect of the Capitol B. Henry Latrobe designed the Liberty in large part ABSTRACT by giving instructons to the sculptor Giuseppe Franzoni, who When the U. S. Capitol burned on 24 August 1814, its prinCipal carved her in plaster. Latrobe’s goal was to copy the plaster chambers were guted and an early masterpiece of American model into Vermont Marble but the opportunity never arrived. Neoclassical sculpture, a colossal personifcaton of Liberty Liberty presided over the Hall only untl that summer night in in the style of the tmes, was completely destroyed. The 1814 when the Capitol was burned by a fre so intense that Liberty is not well known because in her brief lifetme, no even Vermont Marble would have been reduced to lime. artst stopped to record her - not even Latrobe himself, a prolifc sketcher. Liberty presided over Latrobe’s majestc Latrobe was in charge of the Capitol’s design and constructon Hall of Representatves, a chamber that was, itself, a difcult from 1803-1811, a period charged with idealism and allegory collaboraton of confictng ideas between its client Thomas as well as with scandal and misfortune.2 The Liberty was Jeferson and its architect Latrobe. Liberty was an integral organic to the architectural experience of the complete House part of the architecture and of the architectural sequence; chamber—it was not an aferthought and not mere sculptural upon entry into the chamber, the ten foot tall sitng Liberty decoraton. Latrobe wrote: “The Statue is indeed essental to established the chamber’s cross axis within the streaming the efect of my Architecture.”3 Latrobe’s and Franzoni’s Statue difusion of one hundred skylights, profered entrants a of Liberty represents the successful culminaton of a long carved copy of the Consttuton, cradled a cap of liberty, efort by early American designers to create a monumental and was heralded by a bald eagle. personifcaton of Liberty within a major public space. Latrobe’s drive to create the Liberty was essental to his THE ENIGMA concept for the Hall of Representatves. His collaboraton In researching Latrobe’s lost and unbuilt works at the U.S. with the artst Franzoni also is essental as it demonstrates Capitol (this paper on the Liberty being the second in a series), the delicate dialectc between architectural concept and the author was transfxed by the enigma of contemporary executed form in a public project. I will show for the frst writen and archival records that suggest a superlatve body tme a model of the colossal Liberty, carefully reconstructed of Latrobe’s work unsupported by visual or pictorial evidence. based on all known facts, a single drawing, and the aesthetc How could Latrobe’s American masterpieces be seen again? proclivites of the principal designers. I have diligently recon- The author resolved to forensically piece together this period structed the entre Hall, with the Liberty, necessarily, being of the Capitol as a comprehensive digital model based on origi- the most formidable aspect of the design. The making of the nal sources. Many disparate details emerged in the research Liberty represents about twenty years of efort by various process - conficts between leters, documents, drawings, architects and artsts to bring to fruiton the confuence of a change orders, and extant material - which then required anal- major public work of American architecture and an integral ysis, sequencing, rectfcaton, and recreaton as a composite work of monumental American sculpture. and conclusive digital form. The author recreated the Liberty itself directly in clay based on informaton from a dozen leters INTRODUCTION and one drawing. The images included in this paper are digital When the U.S. Capitol burned on 24 August 1814, its principal images of the entre recreated chamber interior of which the chambers were guted and a colossal masterpiece of American Liberty is the central element. William C. Allen’s seminal book neoclassical sculpture, the naton’s frst Statue of Liberty, was on the history of the design and constructon of the Capitol completely destroyed.1 The Liberty is not well known because, mentons the existence of the Liberty sculpture but does not in its brief lifetme, no artst ever stopped to record it. All that detail its story.4 remains are descriptons in leters of its design development and its placement in the famous Hall of Representatves (also 2 Paper ttle to be inserted on master page Figure 1. (clockwise from lef): B. Henry Latrobe, detail of the Liberty inside the Hall (1804); Thomas Cooley, politcal cartoon of Only two sessions of Congress met in Federal Hall but the Liberty and Britannia (1783); Giuseppe Ceracchi, Minerva (1792); important Residence Act of 1790 was passed here, creat- Samuel Jennings, Liberty Displaying the Arts and Sciences (1792). ing the District of Columbia. The third session of Congress met at Congress Hall, Philadelphia, in December 1790, and ICONOGRAPHY AND EARLY ATTEMPTS AT MAKING A would remain there untl the removal of the government to LIBERTY Washington, D.C. in 1800. The idea of an American symbol of freedom was not new in 1805 (the year Latrobe frst mentoned in his leters the idea The Residence Act gave the president unprecedented over- of a Liberty sculpture for the Hall). Since colonial tmes, alle- sight over every aspect of the relocaton of the capital, and gorical fgures of American freedom were common. Usually in early 1791 George Washington asked L’Enfant to design personifed as a female Natve American in headdress, she the new federal city. L’Enfant developed a plan of radiatng was known as Liberty, Freedom, or Columbia. Liberty evolved avenues connectng salient higher elevatons interwoven with toward a Greco-Roman personifcaton in the later eighteenth a grid of smaller streets - a symbolic expression of the new century, as interest in neoclassicism and archaeology increas- government. L’Enfant described Jenkins Hill, an elevaton of ingly infuenced the arts. about ninety feet above sea level overlooking vast wetlands to the west and his choice for the site of the Capitol, as a “ped- Late in 1788, French architect Peter Charles L’Enfant was estal waitng for a monument.”6 He suggested placing below asked by the New York City government to renovate its City the crest of the hill a “grand Equestrian fgure,” a reference to Hall for the frst session of the First Federal Congress in April the bronze statue of George Washington that Congress had 1789. L’Enfant’s elegant additons and renovatons of the inte- approved on 7 August 1783. The concept of Washington’s rior were well received and described in print but were not equestrian statue became the core of the next serious atempt recorded as pictures or engravings. He established an early to personify an American Liberty. standard for the hierarchy and decoraton of an important fed- eral building which included no small degree of iconographic Also in 1791, the Roman sculptor Giuseppe Ceracchi arrived representaton. L’Enfant planned for a sunburst pediment on in America, “flled with a volcanic enthusiasm for Liberty and the facade and a Statue of Liberty behind the Speaker’s chair. the Rights of Man.”7 Ceracchi was fresh from Europe, where But there is no record that a Liberty was installed.5 he had struggled mightly to establish himself as a preeminent OPEN: 108th ACSA Annual Meetng 3 Figure 2. Latrobe’s east-west secton drawing of the South Wing showing the placement of the Liberty (1804). bronze equestrian statue of Washington. His six foot draw- ing of the monument was exhibited in a Philadelphia tavern in sculptor of politcal leaders and politcal monuments. His busts 1791 but is now lost.8 and portraits were ofen excellent; his larger compositons, with their metaphors and allegories, were ofen complicated. Ceracchi never had the opportunity to carve his grandi- In a fuid, synthetc atempt to bring glory to the revolutonary ose monument to American Liberty. Afer a vain atempt spirit in America as well as invigorate his own career, Ceracchi to win the favor of leading members of the Washington proposed to Congress a “Monument designed to perpetuate Administraton and of Congress by carving their portraits,9 the Memory of American Liberty.” Based on Ceracchi’s ver- followed by a return to Europe, an exile from Rome, and bose descripton, his American natonal monument proposal another trip to America, his subscripton plan to fnance the was topped by a fantastc personifcaton of Liberty. ambitous monument failed. Ceracchi’s technical approach to carving the sixty-foot high monument is not known, but it Ceracchi proposed his concept to Congress in 1791 and then is difcult to imagine the complexity of carving the baroque again in 1795. Most likely, the statue was to be erected below Liberty descending through volumes of marble clouds and Capitol Hill, the same area L’Enfant had identfed. In his open- a rainbow in a horse-drawn chariot - all at a tme when the ing paragraph, Ceracchi wrote: “The Goddess [of Liberty] is constructon of the Capitol had not yet begun. His hyperbolic represented descending in a car drawn by four horses, dartng vision of American Liberty died in 1795 and a handful of years through a volume of clouds, which conceals the summit of a later so did he.