Studies of the Temporal Abundance, Spatial Distribution and Parasitism of the European Cabbage Moth, Mamestra Brass/Cae L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies of the Temporal Abundance, Spatial Distribution and Parasitism of the European Cabbage Moth, Mamestra Brass/Cae L STUDIES OF THE TEMPORAL ABUNDANCE, SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND PARASITISM OF THE EUROPEAN CABBAGE MOTH, MAMESTRA BRASS/CAE L. (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE LARVAL ENDOPARAS|TOtD, MICRO?L\T\S MEDTATOR (HALIDAy) (HYMENoPTERA: BRACONI DAE). A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Manitoba by Nicole A. Lauro ln Paftial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Depadment of Entomology @ October 2001 tr¡$onatt-iurav Bibliothèque nationale l*l du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions el Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wollingfon Str€€t 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Yout ñl€ volre .élércrco The author has granted a non- L'auter¡r a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film" de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électonique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extacts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantíels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent ête imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sâns son permission. autorisation. 0-612-76989-5 Canad'ä TEt. ¡1Y¡'1¡BRSITY OF MANITOBA FACT]LTY OF GI,{DUATE STIJDTES COPYRIGHT PERMISSION PAGE STT]DIES OF TIIE TEMPORAL ABUNDANCE, SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND PARASITISM OF TFTF'ET]ROPEAN CABBAGE MOTH, MAMESTRA BRASSICA.E L. (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTIIIDAE) WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TIIE LARVAL ENDOPARASITOID, M I C R O P LI TIS M E D IA T O R (IIALTDAÐ GINVIENOPTERA : BRAC ONIDAE). BY Nicole A. Lauro A ThesisÆracticum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE NICOLE A. LA{JRO @2001 Permission has been granted to the Library of The University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilm Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither this thesis/practicum nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's written permission. &,or, //re n¿ett¿o,,f/, "/e;lh,,""r Zr,"rÁr, o*,ln/rrol of*y /984-200/ Ul ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I greatly appreciate the support, advice and patience of my advisor, Dr. Neil Holliday. I would also like to express my appreciation to Dr. Ulli Kuhlmann for his support and guidance during my time in Switzerland. I would like to thank the members of my committee for helpful discussions; Dr. Ulli Kuhlmann, Dr. Peter Mason, Dr. Patricia Mackay and Dr. Rachael Scarth. I thank the following people for their help with field work in Switzerland: Emma Hunt for her exceptional and always enthusiastic technical aid in both years of my study and; to Jennifer Otani, Bettina Jahn, Silvia Micheletti, Stephanie Harris and Doris Herrmann for their cooperative assistance. I express my sincere appreciation to Roland Fasnacht, Walter Muhlemann and Thomas Kaenel for allowing samples to be taken from their organic fields; and to all those whose encouragement and advice has helped me along the way; s.A. stockton, Dr. S.A. Marshall, Dr. u. schaffner, H.D. white, L. Reimer and M. Alperyn. And of course, my family, for all of their love and support. The funding for this project has been provided by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through CABI Bioscience, and Agriculture Research and Development lnitiative. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......iii TABLE OF CONTENTS...... ............... iv LIST OF FIGURES ...... vi LIST OF TABLES .............. ix ABSTRACT....... ...... xi CHAPTER '1: General lntroduction... ...........'1 CHAPTER 2: Literature Review 2.1 Predictions of Host Choice..... .......4 2.1.1 Definitions. ............5 2.2 "A Suitable Host" ......6 2.3 Host Attributes and Parasitism. ............8 2.3.1 Behavioural Attributes .......I 2.3.2 Chemical Attributes ...........9 2.3.3 Visual Attributes ........10 2.4 Experience with Hosts .....12 2.5 The Distribution of Hosts ............. 13 2.6 Host Specialization..... ......... 13 2.7 Measures of Parasitoid Performance...... ....15 2.7.1 Parasitism. ......... 15 2.7.2 Host Suitability and Oviposition Behaviour..... ....16 2.7.3 The Selection of Parasitoids for Biological Control..... ..........17 2.8 The Study Organisms ...... ............ 19 2.8.1 Mamestra brassicae L....... .........19 2.8.2 Microplitis mediator (Haliday) ..... ...20 CHAPTER 3: Seasonal abundance, parasitism and distribution of Mamestra brassicae L. in organic vegetable field plots in Switzerland ........23 Abstract .........23 3.1 lntroduction. .....25 3.2 Materials and Methods ....25 3.2.1 Field Plot Description ...........25 3.2.2 Sampling M. brassicae: 1998 .......26 3.2.3 Sampling M. brassicae: 1999 ..........29 3.2.4 Host Range . .... .........29 3.2.5 Statistical Analysis ......30 3.3 Results.......... ..........31 3.3.1 Sampling 1998........ ....................31 3.3.2 Sampling '1999 . .........33 3.3.3 Host Distribution .........34 3.3.4 Parasitism Rate and Host Density ......... .........35 3.3.5 Host Range ...... ....36 3.4 Discussion.. ......37 3.4.1 Seasonal Abundance .....37 3.4.2 Parasitism .....3B 3.4.3 Spatial Distribution...... ..........41 3.4.4 Host Range ....... ...........44 CHAPTER 4: Host choice by a solitary larval endoparasitoid, Microplitis mediator (Haliday) (Hymenoptera. Braconidae): host acceptance and host suitability ....95 Abstract ............95 4.1 lntroduction ... .........97 4.2 Malerials and Methods ...................99 4.2,1 Rearing of Hosts. ..........99 4.2.2 Rearing of Parasitoids... ..........100 4.2.3 Attacks by Parasitoids . .......... 101 4.2.4 Oviposition by Parasitoids .....102 4.2.5 Host Suitability. ...102 4.2.6 Statistical Analysis ........ 103 4.3 Results ...... ...... 103 4.3.1 Attacks by Parasitoids. .... .....103 4.3.1.1 No-Choice Experiment... ... 103 4.3.1.2 Choice Experiment ....... ..........104 4.3.2 Oviposition by Parasitoids ...... 105 4.3.3 Host Suitability. ... 106 4.4 Discussion....... .......107 CHAPTER 5: General Discussion....... .......137 5.1 Host Selection by Microplitis mediator .... ....... 138 5.2 Parasitism in Field Plots ........139 CHAPTER 6: List of References . ....143 VI LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.2.1 A schematic representation of one field plot used for sampling Mamestra brassicae egg masses and larvae from 1998-1999 in the vegetable growing region of Bielersee, near to Galmiz, Switzerland...... ....46 Figure 3.3.1 Seasonal abundance of Mamesfra brassicae a) eggs and egg masses and larval instars b) one to three and c) four to six in five field plots sampled in the region of Bielersee, nearto Galmiz, Switzerland in 1998...........49 Figure 3.3.2 Mean weekly parasitism (%) of Mamestra brassicae eggs by two egg parasitoids, Trichogramma buesi and Telenomus sp. in five field plots sampled in 1998 .....54 Figure 3.3.3 Mean weekly parasitism of Mamestra brassicae larvae (instars l-lV) by Microplitis mediaforin five field plots sampled in 1998 ....57 Figure 3.3.4 Seasonal abundance of Mamesfra brassicae a) eggs and egg masses and larval instars b) one to three and c) four to six in five field plots sampled in the region of Bielersee, near to Galmiz, Switzerland in 1999...........59 Figure 3.3.5 Mean weekly parasitism (%) of Mamestra brassicae eggs by two egg parasitoids, Trichogramma buesiand Telenomus sp. in five field plots sampled in '1999 ....62 Figure 3.3.6 Mean weekly parasitism of Mamestra brassicae larvae (instars l-lV) by Microplitis mediafor in five field plots sampled in 1999 .....65 Figure 3.3.7 Comparison of estimated and observed (t S.E.M.) probability of parasitism by Microplitis mediatorfor plants infested with only first instar larvae of Mamestra brassicae for field plot E sampled in 1 999 .....78 Figure 3.3.8 Comparison of estimated and observed (t S.E.M.) probability of parasitism by Microplitis mediatorfor plants infested with only second instar larvae of Mamestra brassicae for C field plot sampled in 1999 . ................ B0 Figure 3.3.9 Comparison of estimated and observed (t S.E.M.) probability of parasitism by Microplitis mediatorfor plants infested with only third instar larvae of Mamestra brassicaefor field plot C sampled in 1999 ........82 Figure 3.3.10 Comparison of estimated and observed (l S.E.M.) probability of parasitism by Microplitis mediatorfor plants infested with only fourlh instar larvae of Mamestra brassicaefor field plot E sampled in 1999 ..........84 vii Figure 3.4.1 Seasonal abundance of early larval instars (l-lll) of Mamestra brassicae for 1998 showing the upper and lower limits of the economic threshold ..............87 Figure 3.4.2 Seasonal abundance of early larval instars (l-lll) of Mamestra brassicae for 1999 showing the upper and lower limits of the economic threshold .... 89 Figure 3.4.3 Seasonal abundance of late larval instars (lV-Vl) of Mamestra brassicae for 1998 showing the upper and lower limits of the economic threshold ..........91 Figure 3.4.4 Seasonal abundance of early larval instars (lV-Vl) of Mamestra brassicae for 1999 showing the upper and lower limits of the economic threshold ........93 Figure 4.2.1 Schematic illustration of the methodology used to investigate the number of Mamestra brassicae larvae attacked by Microplitis mediafor in no- choice exposures ..114 Figure 4.2.2 Schematic illustration of the methodology used to investigate the number of Mamestra brassicae larvae attacked by Microplitis mediatorin choice exposures ......116 Figure 4.3.1 Percent (t S.E.M) of first, second and third instar larvae of Mamestra brassicae attacked by Microplitis mediaforfemales in the no-choice experiment .....
Recommended publications
  • Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen Und Angaben Zur Verbreitung Und Ökologie Der Einzelnen Arten
    5 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie) Herausgeber: 4fr für Naturkunde, RosensteinV 70 19 l; , Staatliches Museum 1, D- r Stuttgart Stuttgarter Beitr. Naturk. Ser. A Nr. 506 170 S ,4. 9. 19.94 Professor Dr. Bernhard Ziegler zum 65. Geburtstag Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten The Tachinids (Diptera: Tachinidae) of Central Europe: Identification Keys for the Species and Data on Distribution and Ecology Von Hans-Peter Tschorsnig und Benno Herting, Stuttgart Mit 291 Abbildungen Summary Keys are given for all central and northern European species of Tachinidae (Diptera). The most important data on distribution and ecology (mainly habitat, phenology, and host-range) are listed for the central European species. Zuammenfassung Es werden Bestimmungsschlüssel für alle in Mittel- und Nordeuropa vorkommenden Arten der Tachinidae (Diptera) gegeben. Für jede mitteleuropäische Art werden die wichtigsten Kenndaten zur Verbreitung und Ökologie (vor allem Habitat, Flugzeit und Wirtskreis) aufge- listet. Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2 2. Beg'iff.c erklärungen 4 2.1. Allgemeines 4 2.2. Kopf 5 2.3. Thorax 7 2.4. Flügel 8 2.5. Beine 9 2.6. Abdomen 10 2.7. Bereifung 11 2.8. Färbung . 11 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 2 STUTTGARTER BEITRÄGE ZUR NATURKUNDE Ser. A, Nr. 506 2.9. Körpergröße 11 2.10. Abkürzungen 11 3. Schlüssel für die Gattungen 12 4. Schlüssel für die Arten . 42 4.1. Subfamilie Exoristinae 42 4.2. Subfamilie Tachininae 63 4.3. Subfamilie Dexiinae 79 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • No Slide Title
    Tachinidae: The “other” parasitoids Diego Inclán University of Padova Outline • Briefly (re-) introduce parasitoids & the parasitoid lifestyle • Quick survey of dipteran parasitoids • Introduce you to tachinid flies • major groups • oviposition strategies • host associations • host range… • Discuss role of tachinids in biological control Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Life cycle of a parasitoid Alien (1979) Life cycle of a parasitoid Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Parasitoid does not kill the host kill its host Insects life cycles Life cycle of a parasitoid Some facts about parasitoids • Parasitoids are diverse (15-25% of all insect species) • Hosts of parasitoids = virtually all terrestrial insects • Parasitoids are among the dominant natural enemies of phytophagous insects (e.g., crop pests) • Offer model systems for understanding community structure, coevolution & evolutionary diversification Distribution/frequency of parasitoids among insect orders Primary groups of parasitoids Diptera (flies) ca. 20% of parasitoids Hymenoptera (wasps) ca. 70% of parasitoids Described Family Primary hosts Diptera parasitoid sp Sciomyzidae 200? Gastropods: (snails/slugs) Nemestrinidae 300 Orth.: Acrididae Bombyliidae 5000 primarily Hym., Col., Dip. Pipunculidae 1000 Hom.:Auchenorrycha Conopidae 800 Hym:Aculeata Lep., Orth., Hom., Col., Sarcophagidae 1250? Gastropoda + others Lep., Hym., Col., Hem., Tachinidae > 8500 Dip., + many others Pyrgotidae 350 Col:Scarabaeidae Acroceridae 500 Arach.:Aranea Hym., Dip., Col., Lep., Phoridae 400?? Isop.,Diplopoda
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of the Czech Republic
    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 March 2009 Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Republic Jaromir Vafihara*, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig, Benno Herting’r, Petr Mfickstein & Veronika Michalkova J P. & V. Vanhara, ., Tschorsnig, H.-P., Herting, B., Miickstein, Michalkova, 2009: Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Re- public. — Entomol. Fennica 20: 22—48. An annotated host catalogue is given for the Tachinidae ofthe Czech Republic. It comprises 149 of476 tachinid species which are currently known from this coun- try (included the two new records cited below). 195 hosts are listed. The first host records ofTachinidae date back to the second halfofthe 19th century. The bibli- ography for the host records consists of 1 16 papers of 55 researchers. Several re- cords of hitherto unpublished material are included. Phryxe setifacies and Anthomyiopsis plagioderae are first records for the Czech Republic. J. Vanhara (*corresponding author), Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] H.—P. Tschorsnig, Staatliches Museumflir Naturkunde, Rosenstein I, D— 70 191 Stuttgart, Germany, tschorsnig.smns@naturkundemuseum—bw.de P. Muckstein Administration of the Protected Landscape Area Zd’drske' vrchy, Brnenska 39, CZ—591 01 Zd’dr nad Sazavou, Czech Republic, muchstein @email.cz V. Michalkova, Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Received 22 August 200 7, accepted 21 January 2008 1. Introduction The tachinid species are listed in their actual valid nomenclature; probable misidentifications Tachinidae are a very large and important dipter- are — if possible — tentatively corrected, but the an family of (mainly) insect parasitoids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tachinid Times
    The Tachinid Times ISSUE 24 February 2011 Jim O’Hara, editor Invertebrate Biodiversity Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada ISSN 1925-3435 (Print) C.E.F., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 ISSN 1925-3443 (Online) Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] My thanks to all who have contributed to this year’s announcement before the end of January 2012. This news- issue of The Tachinid Times. This is the largest issue of the letter accepts submissions on all aspects of tachinid biology newsletter since it began in 1988, so there still seems to be and systematics, but please keep in mind that this is not a a place between peer-reviewed journals and Internet blogs peer-reviewed journal and is mainly intended for shorter for a medium of this sort. This year’s issue has a diverse news items that are of special interest to persons involved assortment of articles, a few announcements, a listing of in tachinid research. Student submissions are particularly recent literature, and a mailing list of subscribers. The welcome, especially abstracts of theses and accounts of Announcements section is more sizable this year than usual studies in progress or about to begin. I encourage authors and I would like to encourage readers to contribute to this to illustrate their articles with colour images, since these section in the future. This year it reproduces the abstracts add to the visual appeal of the newsletter and are easily of two recent theses (one a Ph.D. and the other a M.Sc.), incorporated into the final PDF document.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EFFECTS of NATURAL and ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS on the PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE of INSECTS IRJA KIVIMÄGI a Thesis for Applying
    THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE OF INSECTS LOODUSLIKE JA ANTROPOGEENSETE FAKTORITE MÕJU PUTUKATE FÜSIOLOOGILISELE SEISUNDILE IRJA KIVIMÄGI A thesis for applying for degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology Väitekiri filosoofiadoktori kraadi taotlemiseks entomoloogia erialal Tartu 2012 EESTI MAAÜLIKOOL ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE OF INSECTS LOODUSLIKE JA ANTROPOGEENSETE FAKTORITE MÕJU PUTUKATE FÜSIOLOOGILISELE SEISUNDILE IRJA KIVIMÄGI A thesis for applying for degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology Väitekiri filosoofiadoktori kraadi taotlemiseks entomoloogia erialal Tartu 2012 Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Estonian University of Life Sciences According to verdict No 119 of October 9, 2012, the Doctoral Committee of the Agricultural and Natural Sciences of the Estonian University of Life Sciences has accepted this for thesis for the defence of degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology. Opponent: Prof. Habil. Vincais Būda Institute of Ecology Vilnius University Lithuania Supervisors: Dr. Luule Metspalu Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Estonian University of Life Sciences Dr. Angela Ploomi Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Estonian University of Life Sciences Defence of the thesis: Estonian University of Life Sciences, Karl Ernst von Baer House, Veski 4, Tartu, on November 15, 2012 at 10.00. The English language was edited by Dr. Ingrid H. Williams and Dr. Eha Kruus, and the Estonian by Dr. Luule Metspalu. Publication of this thesis is granted by the Estonian University of Life Sciences and by the Doctoral School of Earth Sciences and Ecology created under the auspices of European Social Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Entomological Research Society
    ISSN 1302-0250 Journal of the Entomological Research Society --------------------------------- Volume: 20 Part: 3 2018 JOURNAL OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH SOCIETY Published by the Gazi Entomological Research Society Editor (in Chief) Abdullah Hasbenli Managing Editor Associate Editor Zekiye Suludere Selami Candan Review Editors Doğan Erhan Ersoy Damla Amutkan Mutlu Nurcan Özyurt Koçakoğlu Language Editor Nilay Aygüney Subscription information Published by GERS in single volumes three times (March, July, November) per year. The Journal is distributed to members only. Non-members are able to obtain the journal upon giving a donation to GERS. Papers in J. Entomol. Res. Soc. are indexed and abstracted in Biological Abstract, Zoological Record, Entomology Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Field Crop Abstracts, Organic Research Database, Wheat, Barley and Triticale Abstracts, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Veterinary Bulletin, Review of Agricultural Entomology, Forestry Abstracts, Agroforestry Abstracts, EBSCO Databases, Scopus and in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Publication date: November 25, 2018 © 2018 by Gazi Entomological Research Society Printed by Hassoy Ofset Tel:+90 3123415994 www.hassoy.com.tr J. Entomol. Res. Soc., 20(3): 01-22, 2018 Research Article Print ISSN:1302-0250 Online ISSN:2651-3579 Palm Weevil Diversity in Indonesia: Description of Phenotypic Variability in Asiatic Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus vulneratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Sukirno SUKIRNO1, 2* Muhammad TUFAIL1,3 Khawaja Ghulam RASOOL1 Abdulrahman
    [Show full text]
  • (Bill) Turnock (1929–2008): Entomological Career, Research Contri- Butions and Bibliography
    14 Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Manitoba, Volume 65, 2009 WILLIAM J. (BILL) TURNOCK (1929–2008): ENTOMOLOGICAL CAREER, RESEARCH CONTRI- BUTIONS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY R.J. Lamb Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2M9 Canada Bill Turnock’s career is remembered in the Newsletter of the Entomological Society of Manitoba, 2008, 35(1): 3-5, the Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Canada, 2008, 40(2): 80-82, and the Winnipeg Free Press, April 16, 2008. Entomological Career Bill was born and grew up in Winnipeg. He received a B.Sc. in Agriculture from the University of Manitoba (1949), M.Sc. in Entomology and Forestry (1951) and Ph.D. in Plant and Animal Ecology (1959) both from the University of Minnesota. His entomological career began in the Canada Department of Forestry in 1949. He spent many seasons studying the population dynamics of forest insects at a field station by Red Rock Lake in Whiteshell Provincial Park east of Winnipeg. By 1967 Bill was head of the research section and his research in forest ecology continued until 1970, when the Winnipeg Forestry Laboratory was closed. Bill then became Science Advisor to the Ministry of State for Science and Technology, and he and his family moved to Ottawa. In 1972, Bill made the transition to agricultural research as head of a new section at Agriculture Canada in Winnipeg concerned with insect pests attacking canola, a new and rapidly expanding crop. He continued as section head until retirement in 1993. Bill was an adjunct professor in the Department of Entomology at the University of Manitoba from 1975-1983 and supervised the theses of two M.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. Biocontrol Arthropods: New Denizens of Canada's
    291 Chapter 12 Biocontrol Arthropods: New Denizens of Canada’s Grassland Agroecosystems Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate and Héctor Cárcamo Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre 5403 - 1 Avenue South, P.O. Box 3000 Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1 Abstract. Canada’s grassland ecosystems have undergone major changes since the arrival of European agriculture, ranging from near-complete replacement of native biodiversity with annual crops to the effects of overgrazing by cattle on remnant native grasslands. The majority of the “agroecosystems” that have replaced the historical native grasslands now encompass completely new associations of plants and arthropods in what is typically a mix of introduced and native species. Some of these species are pests of crops and pastures and were accidentally introduced. Other species are natural enemies of these pests and were deliberately introduced as classical biological control (biocontrol) agents to control these pests. To control weeds, 76 arthropod species have been released against 24 target species in Canada since 1951, all of which also have been released in western Canada. Of these released species, 53 (70%) have become established, with 18 estimated to be reducing target weed populations. The biocontrol programs for leafy spurge in the prairie provinces and knapweeds in British Columbia have been the largest, each responsible for the establishment of 10 new arthropod species on rangelands. This chapter summarizes the ecological highlights of these programs and those for miscellaneous weeds. Compared with weed biocontrol on rangelands, classical biocontrol of arthropod crop pests by using arthropods lags far behind, mostly because of a preference to manage crop pests with chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Proc Ent Soc Mb 2009, Volume 65
    Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Manitoba Volume 65 2009 Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Manitoba VOLUME 65 2009 T.D. Galloway Editor Winnipeg, Manitoba Entomological Society of Manitoba The Entomological Society of Manitoba was formed in 1945 “to foster the advance- ment, exchange and dissemination of Entomological knowledge”. This is a profes- sional society that invites any person interested in entomology to become a member by application in writing to the secretary. The society produces a quarterly newslet- ter, the Proceedings, and has a variety of meetings, seminars and social activities. Persons interested in joining the society should consult the website at http://home. cc.umanitoba.ca/~fieldspg, or contact: David Ostermann The Secretary Entomological Society of Manitoba Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives Agricultural Services Complex 201-545 University Crescent Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA R3T 5S6 Contents Tribute and Bibliography: S. Cameron Jay (1929-2008). N.J. Holliday and R.W. Currie .............. 5 William (Bill) J. Turnock (1929-2008). R.J. Lamb .............................14 Research Note: Culiseta melanura (Diptera: Culicidae), a new record for the Manitoba mosquito fauna. Mahmood Iranpour, L. Robbin Lindsay, and Antonia Dibernardo .....................................................................21 Scientific Programme Abstracts for the 2009 Joint Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of Canada and the Entomological Society of Manitoba: Scientific Programme Abstracts ..........................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • AGRONOOMIA 2015 Agronomy 2015
    Eesti Maaülikool Põllumajandus- ja keskkonnainstituut Eesti Taimekasvatuse Instituut Estonian University Of Life Sciences Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Estonian Crop Research Institute AGRONOOMIA 2015 Agronomy 2015 Tartu 2015 TOIMETUS / EDITORIAL Toimetajad / Editors Maarika Alaru Alar Astover Kadri Karp Rein Viiralt Anne Must Kogumik ilmub teaduskonverentsiks Agronoomia 2015 The present book is published for the conference Agronomy 2015 Toimetus tänab artiklite retsensente nende suurepärase töö eest Editors would like to thank all reviewers for their perfect work Kogumik on välja antud MAK meede 1.1. raames, toetab Euroopa Liit © 2015 Eesti Maaülikool / Estonian University of Life Sciences Eesti Taimekasvatuse Instituut / Estonian Crop Research Institute Trükitud Ecoprint AS / Printed by Ecoprint AS ISSN 1736-6275 3 Sisukord MULLATEADUS JA MAAVILJELUS 10–15 Mulla tallamise järelmõju mulla omadustele ja rohumaa saagikusele Mihkel Are, Endla Reintam, Are Selge, Diego Sanchez de Cima 16–21 Viljelussüsteemide mõju mulla süsinikuvarule Karin Kauer, Berit Tein, Liina Talgre, Vyacheslav Eremeev, Anne Luik 22–27 Eestis kasvatatavate suviteraviljade mullaharimisviisid ja külvitehnoloogia lähtuvalt mulla lõimisest Helis Luik, Kaire Vahejõe, Ants-Hannes Viira 28–33 Biomassituhk sobib põllule väetiseks Henn Raave, Karin Kauer, Indrek Keres, Märt Nõges, Jaanus Rebane, Are Selge, Mailiis Tampere, Rein Viiralt 34–39 Viljelusviisi ja väetamise mõju vihmaussidele Endla Reintam, Greete Kahu, Kati Sulp, Diego Sanches de Cima, Mihkel
    [Show full text]
  • View the PDF File of the Tachinid Times, Issue 9
    The Tachinid Times ISSUE 9 February 1996 Jim O'Hara, editor Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Biological Resources Division Centre for Land & Biological Resources Research C.E.F., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 This is the first issue of this newsletter to be offered variegata) is one of the most common pests of many simultaneously (more or less) as hardcopy and over the kinds of roadside trees of urban areas in southern Japan, Internet. For those of you receiving this newsletter in west of Tokyo. This bagworm is never found in natural hardcopy and who wish to view the Internet version, the forests. In the fall of 1995, one of us (TT) collected Internet address of the Biological Resources Division of many specimens of this bagworm near our University our Centre is: http://res.agr.ca/brd/home.html. The campus in Fukuoka and reared them to get some Tachinid Times can be accessed through the BRD parasitoids. Unexpectedly, many individuals of an Homepage. In the years to come the mailing list for the unknown tachinid soon emerged from the bagworms, for hardcopy version of this newsletter will certainly decline the only known tachinid parasitoid of the bagworm is as Internet access becomes more widespread. Exorista japonica and its percentage parasitism had been The Biological Resources Division is about to known to be very low. Later this tachinid was identified undergo another name change. For those attempting to as Nealsomyia rufella (Bezzi), a microtype Oriental keep track, the group of systematists to which I belong tachinid known as a parasitoid of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachinidae Bigot 1853
    Dr Francesco Fiume Tachinidae Bigot 1853 Taxonomy of Tachinidae family Clade Natura Clade Mundus Plinius Superdominium/Superdomain Biota Bernard Pelletier 2012 Domain Eukaryota (Chatton 1925) Whittaker et Margulis 1978 Clade Amorphea Adl 2005 Clade Opisthokonta (Cavalier Smith 1987) Adl 2005 Clade Holozoa Lang et al . 2002 Kingdom Animalia Linnaeus 1758 Clade Epitheliozoa Ax 1996 Subkingdom Eumetazoa Bütschli 1910 Clade Bilateria Hatschek 1888 Clade Eubilateria Ax 1987 or (synonym) Nephrozoa Jondelius et al. 2002 Clade Protostomia Grobben 1908 Clade Ecdysozoa Aguinaldo et al . 1997 Superphylum Panarthropoda Nielsen 1995 Phylum Arthropoda von Siebold 1848 Clade Euarthropoda Lankester 1904 Clade Mandibulata Snodgrass 1938 Clade Crustaceomorpha Chernyshev 1960 Clade Labrophora Siveter, Waloszek et Williams 2003 Subphylum Pancrustacea Zrzavý et al . 1997 Clade Altocrustacea Regier et al . 2010 Clade Miracrustacea Regier et al . 2010 Superclass Exapoda Latreille 1825 Class Insecta Linnaeus 1758 Clade Dicondylia Hennig 1953 Subclass Pterygota Lang 1888 Infraclass Neoptera van der Wulp 1890 Clade Eumetabola Hennig 1953 Clade Holometabola Heider 1889 or (synonym) Endopterygota Sharp 1898 Superordo Panorpida Kristensen 1981 or (synonym) Mecoptera Hyatt et Arms 1891 Clade Antliophora Henning 1969 Order Diptera Linnaeus 1758 Suborder Brachycera Schiner 1862 Section Cyclorrhapha Brauer 1863 Infraorder Muscomorpha McAlpine 1989 Section Schizophora Becher 1882 Subsection Calyptratae Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 Superfamily Oestroidea Latreille 1817 Family Tachinidae Bigot 1853. Generality The Tachinidae are a large and variable family of true flies within the insect order Diptera , with more than 8,200 known species and many more to be discovered. Over 1300 species have been described in North America alone. Insects in this family commonly are called tachina flies or simply tachinids.
    [Show full text]