Abstract Giraffsense Will Advance Service Robotics Solutions by Merging Them with Ambient Assisted Living Environments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COVER PAGE Title of Proposal GiraffSense List of participants Participant No * Participant organisation name Country 1 SU (Coordinator) Stockholm University SE 2 HIB HI Iberia ES 3 DS Danderyds Sjukhus SE 4 PIAP Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów PIAP PL 5 AP-HP Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris FR 6 ALM Almende B.V. NL 7 Giraff Giraffe Technologies SE 8 SK Sundbyberg stad SE 9 AGE AGE Platform Europe BE Abstract GiraffSense will advance service robotics solutions by merging them with ambient assisted living environments. The goal is to sustain both multimodal accessibility application support and daily life support to frail and impaired elderly and their significant others. This is provided throughout impairment development stages, thus extending the years to live independently in the home. GiraffSense will address the physical and cognitive impairments of elderly people ranging from those who manage well to those who are mildly and moderately frail. Affordable support will be provided for activities of daily living, such as medication intake, nutrition, physical exercise, community life, well being, home safety and health awareness. The Giraff mobile service robot platform, dubbed the “Most Promising 2011 AAL Innovation”, the SALIG++ platform and the ReAAL-UNIVERSAAL technology are combined to bring about the necessary technological progress. An open and extensible Future Internet-compliant service architecture will be created. An intelligent knowledge generator will allow switching between different impairment stages. A verification methodology will be developed to evaluate the applications in trials in living-labs and clinical environments with end-users - all reconfigurable and applicable across Europe. GiraffSense will demonstrate its concept viability through its open data research and stakeholders’ platform early on and long after the project. The service robot reference architecture will enable rapid automatic installation and integration of devices. The accessibility support and the knowledge generator will reduce admissions and days spent in care institutions. The quality of life of elderly and carers will be enhanced through stimulating bi-directional communication. The outreach of GiraffSense through its solutions, open data and stakeholders’ platform, scientific excellence and contact with standardisation bodies will ensure global market take-up. [GiraffSense] 1 Doknr: ION-0043/2014-1 Diariedatum: Godkännare: Marianne Saur Hedlund Contents 1 Excellence .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Relation to the work programme ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Concept and approach ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Ambition .......................................................................................................................................... 12 2 Impact ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Expected impacts ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Measures to maximise impact......................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Joint and individual dissemination .......................................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Joint and individual exploitation ............................................................................................. 23 3 Implementation ....................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1 Work plan — Work packages, deliverables and milestones ........................................................... 26 Table 3.1a: Work package description ................................................................................................... 27 Table 3.1b: List of work packages ........................................................................................................... 38 Table 3.1c: List of Deliverables ............................................................................................................... 38 Table 3.2a: List of milestones ................................................................................................................. 40 Table 3.2b: Critical risks for implementation ......................................................................................... 42 Table 3.4a: Summary of staff effort in person-month per work package .............................................. 43 Table 3.4b: ‘Other direct cost’ items (travel, equipment, other goods and services, large research infrastructure) ............................................................................................................................................. 43 3.2 Management structure and procedures ......................................................................................... 44 3.2.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 44 3.2.2 GiraffSense General Assembly (GA) ........................................................................................ 44 3.2.2 GiraffSense Management Committee (MC) ............................................................................ 45 3.2.3 GiraffSense Project Coordinators ............................................................................................ 45 3.2.4 GiraffSense Project Office........................................................................................................ 46 3.2.5 Work Packages (WP) ................................................................................................................ 46 3.2.6 Work Package Leaders ............................................................................................................. 46 3.2.7 Quality Approach/External Reviews ........................................................................................ 46 3.2.9 Management of Knowledge and IPR ....................................................................................... 47 3.2.8 Miscellaneous .......................................................................................................................... 47 3.2.9 Main Management Processes ................................................................................................. 47 3.3 Consortium as a whole .................................................................................................................... 49 3.4 Resources to be committed ............................................................................................................ 49 4 Section 4: Members of the consortium ................................................................................................... 51 4.1 Participants (applicants) .................................................................................................................. 51 4.1.1 Stockholm University (SU) ....................................................................................................... 51 4.1.2 HI-Iberia (HIB) .......................................................................................................................... 53 [GiraffSense] 2 Doknr: ION-0043/2014-1 Diariedatum: Godkännare: Marianne Saur Hedlund 4.1.3 Danderyds Sjukhus (DS) ........................................................................................................... 55 4.1.4 Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów (PIAP) ............................................................. 57 4.1.5 Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris ; - Broca Hospital (AP-HP) ................................... 58 4.1.6 Almende B.V. (ALM) ................................................................................................................ 59 4.1.7 Giraff Technologies (GIR) ......................................................................................................... 62 4.1.8 Sundbyberg Stad (SK) .............................................................................................................. 64 4.1.9 AGE Platform Europe (AGE) .................................................................................................. 65 4.2 Third parties involved in the project (including use of third party resources) ................................ 66 5 Section 5: Ethics and Security .................................................................................................................. 66 5.1 Ethics................................................................................................................................................ 66 5.2 Security ............................................................................................................................................ 69 5.3 References ......................................................................................................................................