Kayonza Irrigation and Integrated Watershed Management Project (KIIWP1)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kayonza Irrigation and Integrated Watershed Management Project (KIIWP1) Rwanda Kayonza Irrigation and Integrated Watershed Management Project (KIIWP1) Project Design Report (PDR) Project ID: 2000002229 Report Number: 5007-RW Document Date: 14 March, 2019 Table of Contents Currency equivalents ...................................................................................... ii Weights and measures .................................................................................... ii Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................... iii Map of the Project Area ................................................................................... v 1. Context ........................................................................................................ 1 National context and rationale for IFAD involvement .............................................. 1 Lessons learned ................................................................................................. 6 2. Project description ...................................................................................... 7 Project objectives, geographic area of intervention and target groups ...................... 7 Components/outcomes and activities .................................................................. 12 Theory of Change ............................................................................................ 17 Alignment, ownership and partnerships .............................................................. 18 Benefits, costs and financing ............................................................................. 21 3. Risk ........................................................................................................... 29 Project risks and mitigation measures ................................................................ 29 Environment and social category ....................................................................... 30 Climate risk classification .................................................................................. 30 4. Implementation ......................................................................................... 31 Organisational Framework ................................................................................ 31 Planning, M&E, Learning, KM and Communications Plans ...................................... 34 Implementation readiness and start-up plans ...................................................... 35 Annex 1: Logical Framework (all phases with KIIWP 1 highlighted in green) ........ 38 Annex 2: Theory of Change ........................................................................... 41 Annex 3: Project cost and financing: Detailed costs tables ................................. 42 Annex 4: Economic and Financial Analysis ...................................................... 53 Annex 5: Social Environment and Climate Assessment (SECAP) Review Note ...... 64 Annex 6: First Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWPB) ....................................... 77 Annex 7: Procurement Plan for first 18 months ............................................... 82 Annex 8: Draft Project Implementation Manual (PIM) ........................................ 85 Annex 9: Integrated Risk Framework (IRF) ..................................................... 86 Annex 10: Exit Strategy ................................................................................ 89 Annex 11: Linkages between the core indicators in KIIWP, the IFAD Strategic Framework (2016 – 2025) and SDG targets ...................................... 91 Annex 12: Information on KIIWP 2 ................................................................. 93 Annex 13: Partnerships foreseen in KIIWP 2 .................................................. 113 Annex 14: Project risks and mitigation measures foreseen in KIIWP2 ................ 116 Annex 15: Key milestones for moving to KIIWP 2 ........................................... 118 i Currency equivalents Currency Unit US$1.0 = RWF 855 Weights and measures 1 kilogram = 1000 g 1 000 kg = 2.204 lb. 1 kilometre (km) = 0.62 mile 1 metre = 1.09 yards 1 square metre = 10.76 square feet 1 acre = 0.405 hectare 1 hectare = 2.47 acres ii Abbreviations and Acronyms AfDB African Development Bank AFR Access to Finance Rwanda AH Animal Husbandry AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AWPB Annual Work Plan and Budget BDF Business Development Fund BDSP Business Development Service Provider CESB Rwanda Capacity Development and Employment Services Board COSOP Country Strategic Opportunities Programme CSA Climate Smart Agriculture DFID Department for International Development EDPRS Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy EFA Economic and Financial Analysis EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FaaB Farming as a Business FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FE Foreign Exchange FFS Farmer Field School FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return FS Feasibility Study GALS Gender Action Learning System GAP Good Agricultural Practices GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS Geographic Information System GoR Government of Rwanda KWAMP Kirehe community-based Watershed Management Project HH Households HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HoReCO Horticulture in Reality Cooperative IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFMIS Integrated Financial Management Information Systems IMF International Monetary Fund IMTA Irrigation Management Transfer Agreement IWMI International Water Management Institute IWUO Irrigation Water User Organisation KM Knowledge Management KOICA Korean International Cooperation Agency LPA Lead Project Agency LWH Land husbandry, Water harvesting and Hillside irrigation project M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MIDIMAR Ministry of Disaster Management and Refugees Affairs MINAGRI Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources MINECOFIN Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning MINIRENA Ministry of Lands, Environment, Forestry, Water and Mines MoU Memorandum of Understanding MPCI Multi Peril Crop Insurance MT Metric Ton MTR Mid Term Review NCCLCD National Strategy on Climate Change and Low-Carbon iii Development NAEB National Agriculture Export development Board NGO Non Governmental Organisation NRM Natural Resources Management OFID OPEC Fund for International Development ORMS Operational Results Management System O&M Operation and Maintenance p.a. Per Annuum PA Priority Area PASP Climate-resilient Post-harvest and Agribusiness Support Programme PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PPP Purchasing Power Parity PRICE Project for Rural Income through Exports PSC Project Steering Committee PSTA Strategic Plan for the Transformation of Agriculture in Rwanda 4P Public Private Producers Partnership RAB Rwanda Agriculture Board RCA Rwanda Cooperative Agency RDDP Rwanda Dairy Development Project REMA Rwanda Environment Management Authority RNRA Rwanda National Resources Authority RSSP Rural Sector Support Programme RWF Rwandan Franc RWFA Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority RYAF Rwanda Youth in Agribusiness Forum SCC Sub-Catchment Committee SDG Sustainable Development Goal SECAP Social, Environmental and Climate Assessment Procedures SOE Statement of Expenditure SPIU Single Project Implementation Unit SSIT Small-Scale Irrigation Technology STARS Strengthening African Rural Smallholders SUN Scaling Up Nutrition SWC Soil and Water Conservation TBD To Be Determined TOC Theory of Change ToT Training of Trainers UNEP United Nations Environment Programme USD United States Dollar VC Value Chain WoP Without Project WP With Project WLUO Water for Livestock User Organisation WUO Water User Organisation iv Map of the Project Area Kayonza Irrigation and Integrated Watershed Management Project v Executive Summary 1. Political and economic background. Small and landlocked, Rwanda is a low- income country, with a densely packed population of about 12.5 million people1 who are mostly under 20-year old, and a total land area of 26,338 km2 of which 68.7 per cent is classified as arable agriculture land. From a tragically low starting point in 1994, Rwanda has enjoyed political stability in the last two decades which, combined with good governance and policy consistency, has created an enabling policy environment ensuring successful delivery of development programs. Since the turn of the century, Rwanda’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita has increased from US$242 to US$729, and poverty has been reduced from 60.3 per cent to 39.1 per cent of the population. 2. Rwanda’s growth in 2016 and early 2017, while below historical standards, remained robust relative to the region, with 2017 growth estimated at 5.2 per cent. Consumer price inflation has continued to decline since February 2017, reflecting improving food supply conditions and declining transport costs. Performance under the PSI-supported program (Policy Support Instrument) and Standby Credit Facility arrangement remained strong, with most quantitative targets and structural reform benchmarks being met. In the most recent debt sustainability analysis by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Rwanda is assessed to be at low risk of debt distress. Rwanda’s external debt portfolio remains mostly constituted of concessional loans2, and this is expected to continue being the main source of funding for public projects going forward. 3. Poverty and rural development context. While Rwanda has an impressive
Recommended publications
  • RWANDA Poverty Assessment
    RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2015 1 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment 2 RWANDA Poverty Assessment Poverty Global Practice Africa Region April 2015 3 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................10.... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VIII11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................12 IX 1. A Snapshot of Poverty in Rwanda ..........................................................................................................................12ix Rwanda‘s Poverty Profile: The Expected… ............................................................................................................13 x And the Rather Unexpected … .............................................................................................................................15 xii Inequality is high, driven by location, education, and occupation .......................................................................16 xiii Strong performance in health and basic education ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Improvement of Rural Water Supply in the Eastern Province in the Republic of Rwanda
    MININFRA EASTERN PROVINCE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA THE STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT November 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY JAPAN TECHNO CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. GED JR 11-022 UGANDA RWANDA D.R.CONGO MUSHELI MATIMBA Northern Province 0 5 10 25km Eastern Province RWEMPASHA Western Province KIGALI RWIMIYAGA TABAGWE Southern Province NYAGATARE KARAMA RUKOMO TANZANIA BURUNDI KIYOMBE GATUNDA NYAGATARE KARANGAZI MIMULI KATABAGEMU MUKAMA NGARAMA RWIMBOGO NYAGIHANGA KABARORE GATSIBO GATSIBO GITOKI SUMMARY OF STUDY KAGEYO MURUNDI Study Area : 95 Secteurs of 7 Districts in Eastern Province REMERA RUGARAMA Design Population : 2,641,040 (2020) MUHURA Planned Water Supply Scheme : 92 KIZIGURO (Piped scheme : 81, Handpump scheme : 11) Planned Pipe Line 3,000 km MURAMBI RUKARA GAHINI Replace existing pipe 170 km GASANGE KIRAMURUZI Intake Facilities (spring) 28 MWIRI Intake Facilities (river) 3 FUMBWE Handpump (borehole) 37 MUHAZI KAYONZA MUSHA GISHARI MUKARANGE Existing Facilities (Out of Scope) MUNYIGINYA Existing Pipe Line GAHENGERI NYAMIRAMA RWINKWAVU Existing Water Source KIGABIRO Existing Handpump (working) MWULIRE NDEGO MUYUMBURWAMAGANA RURAMIRA NZIGE KABARONDO MUNYAGA NYAKARIRO MURAMA RUBONA REMERA MWOGO KABARE KARENGE MPANGA RURENGE NTARAMA JURU MUGESERA KAREMBO NASHO KIBUNGO NYAMATA RUKIRA ZAZA RILIMA RUKUMBERI GASHANDA MUSENYI NGOMA MUSHIKIRI KAZO MURAMA NYARUBUYE GASHORA SAKE SHYARA BUGESERAMAYANGE KIGINA KIREHEKIREHE MAREBA MAHAMA MUTENDERI JARAMA GATORE NYARUGENGE NGERUKA RUHUHA RWERU NYAMUGALI MUSAZA KIGARAMA GAHARA KAMABUYE THE STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE TARGET AREA MAP TABLE OF CONTENTS Target Area Map List of Tables List of Figures Abbreviations Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Background ………………………….……...…………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for Fisheries and Fish Farming in Rwanda
    MASTER PLAN FOR FISHERIES AND FISH FARMING IN RWANDA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL RESOURCES 09/04/2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ IV LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ V ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................................... VI ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... VII FORWARD ...................................................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... IX 1 OVERVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE IN RWANDA .........................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 NATIONAL FISH DEMAND ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 FISH PRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District
    Progress, but more effort Target achieved / on track Not on track N/A No data required Increase from last period Decrease from last period Proportion of Measles & Percentage of Proportion of Percentage of women Percentage of Rubella 2nd Delivery in Percentage of Newborn who new-born not Neonatal teenage receiving ANC 1 during ANC 4th mothers who dose (MR2) facility mother who received PNC 4 breathing service case delivery (19 postpartum 1st trimester standard visit Penta 3 received coverage, all coverage (w/ received PNC 4 Visit at 6 weeks successfully fatality years and Family coverage coverage BCG coverage coverage Iron+folic acid ages (BCG census-based Visit at 6 weeks after birth_new resuscitated rate_new under) planning (based on CBR) (based on CBR) (census-based) (census-based) during ANC denominator) target) 51.7 52.7 50.3 7.9 7.2 41.4 52 42.3 117 118.4 91.5 112.8 108 Bugesera District 76 75.3 84.3 5.3 8.3 71.6 51.7 40.5 84.8 87.4 96.7 121.2 69 Burera District 59.2 59.5 60.3 6.7 10.4 39.6 55.4 37.8 78.7 81.9 99.9 116.8 83 Gakenke District 24.4 24.5 70.7 4.4 3.3 28.3 52.8 35.7 123.2 117 59.6 87.7 124 Gasabo District 78.6 78 73.4 9.1 9.1 55 41.1 38 86.5 98.5 89.7 107.6 84 Gatsibo District 63.1 64.1 82 17.1 6.8 85.4 48.2 39.3 87.4 90.7 99 110.4 91 Gicumbi District 78.4 78.3 85.4 10.5 5.5 46.3 70.2 53.1 100.3 108.7 100 114.4 94 Gisagara District 61.6 63.2 68.2 15 4.4 64.5 50.8 36.1 91.5 89.8 100 101.1 95 Huye District 56 57.2 82.2 14.6 6.9 73.2 34.6 26.4 74.2 79.9 75.7 122.5 59 Kamonyi District 52.9 53 74.4 2.7 5.6 61.2 33.1 24
    [Show full text]
  • TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda
    TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT #18 APRIL— JUNE 2009 USAID/Rwanda Cooperative Agreement # 623-A-00-05-00020-00 Distribution: USAID/Rwanda Twubakane Team Partners Government of Rwanda Ministry of Local Administration Ministry of Health National AIDS Control Commission Twubakane Steering Committee Members Twubakane Partner Districts NGOs, Bilateral and Multi-lateral Partner Agencies Twubakane Quarterly Report #18, April-June, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 TWUBAKANE PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS APRIL-JUNE, 2009 ............................................................ 2 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 2. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PROGRESS .......................................................................... 3 2.1 TWUBAKANE PROGRAM FIELD OFFICES ............................................................................ 4 3. PERFORMANCE REVIEW BY PROGRAM COMPONENT ........................................................ 4 3.1 FAMILY PLANNING/REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS AND QUALITY .............................. 4 3.2 CHILD SURVIVAL, MALARIA AND NUTRITION ACCESS AND QUALITY .............................. 7 3.3 DECENTRALIZATION PLANNING, POLICY AND MANAGEMENT ....................................... 10 3.4 DISTRICT-LEVEL CAPACITY BUILDING ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LDCF II Project BASELINE ASSESSMENT REPORT
    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT Rwanda Environment Management Authority Building resilience of communities living in degraded forests, savannahs and wetlands of Rwanda through an Ecosystem based Adaptation (EbA) approach project LDCF II Project BASELINE ASSESSMENT REPORT LDCF II Baseline Assessment Report Revised version after incorporation of validation workshp comments Submitted by: Prof. Jean Nduwamungu Submission date: 02 August 2019 2 LDCF II Baseline Assessment Report LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS EbA Ecosystem based Adaptation GGCRS Green Growth and Climate Resilience Strategy GoR Government of Rwanda LDCF Least Developed Countries Fund Meteo Rwanda Rwanda Meteorology Agency MIDIMAR Ministry of Disaster Management and Refugee Affairs MINAGRI Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources MINALOC Ministry of Local Government MINECOFIN Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning MINEDUC Ministry of Education MINEMA Ministry in charge of Emergency Management MININFRA Ministry of Infrastructure MoE Ministry of Environment MoH Ministry of Health NISR National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda REG Rwanda Energy Group REMA Rwanda Environment Management Authority RHA Rwanda Housing Authority ROR Republic of Rwanda RSB Rwanda Standards Board RTDA Rwanda Transport Development Agency RWFA Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority UNEP United Nations Environment Program WASAC Water and Sanitation Corporation 3 LDCF II Baseline Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kayonza District
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA KAYONZA DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 100 CLASSROOMS AND 140 LATRINES UNDER QUALITY BASIC EDUCATION FOR HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT (QBE-HCD) PROJECT IN KAYONZA DISTRICT Final Report December, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of Kayonza District ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Description of sub-projects activities ........................................................................................... 3 1.4 Purpose of the ESMP .................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER II: POLICY, LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .......................... 7 2.1 Institutional Framework ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Common Ground (SFCG): Land Programming in Rwanda
    1 Search For Common Ground (SFCG): Land Programming in Rwanda Final evaluation « Umurage w’Ejo, the Legacy for Tomorrow project: Land and Livelihood in Rwanda » European Union Midterm evaluation « Strengthen citizen participation around sensitive issues in order to prevent conflict in the Great Lakes Region » Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs March 2015 Compiled by: Florence Ferrari 2 Content 1. Executive summary ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Project Overview .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Objectives of evaluation ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Key findings ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 7 2. Background information .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Projects overview .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA Livelihood Zones and Descriptions June 2012
    RWANDA Livelihood Zones and Descriptions June 2012 MAP OF REVISED LIVELIHOOD ZONES IN RWANDA FEWS NET Washington FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The content of this report does not [email protected] necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International www.fews.net Development or the United States Government. RWANDA Livelihood Zones and Descriptions April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Map of Revised Livelihood Zones in Rwanda............................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Rural Livelihood Zones in Rwanda ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Lake Kivu Coffee & Food Crops (Zone 1) ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Zone 1: Seasonal calendar ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers' Perceptions, Production and Productivity Constraints
    HORTSCIENCE 50(1):36–43. 2015. There are varied preferences and needs by end users for crop cultivars. For instance, for industrial starch production, sweetpotato cul- Farmers’ Perceptions, Production and tivars are required to have high dry matter content, whereas cultivars for human con- Productivity Constraints, Preferences, sumption should have other traits such as attractive skin and flesh color, good cooking and Breeding Priorities of Sweetpotato quality, and high b-carotene, among others. Sweetpotato cultivars intended for animal feed should have high protein content (Lebot, in Rwanda 2009). Therefore, sweetpotato breeding should Rukundo Placide1, Hussein Shimelis, and Mark Laing involve the needs of stakeholders in the de- African Centre for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private veloping of new cultivars and new agricultural technologies to meet their diverse requirements Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (Atlin et al., 2001; Rees et al., 2003). Daphrose Gahakwa Agricultural technologies developed through participatory research have a greater chance of Rwanda Agriculture Board (RAB), P.O. Box 5016, Kigali-Rwanda adoption and diffusion by farmers because they Additional index words. breeding priorities, farmers’ preferences, production constraints, are developed in response to local constraints sweetpotato and meet end users’ needs and preferences (Ashby and Lilja, 2004). Various research Abstract. The role of farmers and their production constraints and preferences are approaches have been reported in participatory important for sweetpotato breeding and adoption of cultivars and agronomic production breeding of new crop cultivars, including con- packages. The objective of this study was to assess farmers’ perception, production sultative approaches, collaborative approaches, constraints, preferences, and breeding priorities of sweetpotato in selected agro-ecologies collegial approaches, and farmer experimenta- of Rwanda.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Law No 29/2005 of 31/12/2005 Determining The
    Year 44 Special Issue of 31st December 2005 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Nº 29/2005 of 31/12/2005 Organic Law determining the administrative entities of the Republic of Rwanda. Annex I of Organic Law n° 29/2005 of 31/12/2005 determining the administrative entities of the Republic of Rwanda relating to boundaries of Provinces and the City of Kigali. Annex II of Organic Law n° 29/2005 of 31/12/2005 determining the administrative entities of the Republic of Rwanda relating to number and boundaries of Districts. Annex III of Organic Law n° 29/2005 of 31/12/2005 determining the administrative entities of the Republic of Rwanda relating to structure of Provinces/Kigali City and Districts. 1 ORGANIC LAW Nº 29/2005 OF 31/12/2005 DETERMINING THE ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA We, KAGAME Paul, President of the Republic; THE PARLIAMENT HAS ADOPTED AND WE SANCTION, PROMULGATE THE FOLLOWING ORGANIC LAW AND ORDER IT BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA THE PARLIAMENT: The Chamber of Deputies, in its session of December 2, 2005; The Senate, in its session of December 20, 2005; Given the Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda of June 4, 2003, as amended to date, especially in its articles 3, 62, 88, 90, 92, 93, 95, 108, 118, 121, 167 and 201; Having reviewed law n° 47/2000 of December 19, 2000 amending law of April 15, 1963 concerning the administration of the Republic of Rwanda as amended and complemented to date; ADOPTS: CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS Article one: This organic law determines the administrative entities of the Republic of Rwanda and establishes the number, boundaries and their structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide in Rwanda: Documentation of Two Massacres During April 1994
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide Archives and Museum 11-1994 Genocide in Rwanda: Documentation of Two Massacres during April 1994 Virginia Hamilton Koula Papanicolas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/rawson_rwanda Recommended Citation Hamilton, Virginia and Papanicolas, Koula, "Genocide in Rwanda: Documentation of Two Massacres during April 1994" (1994). David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide. 86. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/rawson_rwanda/86 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Archives and Museum at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in David Rawson Collection on the Rwandan Genocide by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genocide in Rwanda: Documentation of Two Massacres during April 1994 November 1994 This report is based on a U.S. Committee for Refugees site visit to Rwanda in August-September 1994. The documentation was gathered, and this report was written, by David Hawk, an expert on documentation of genocide. Hawk is former U.S. Executive Director of Amnesty International, and Associate of the Center for the Study of Human Rights at Columbia University. He has had years of experience documenting Khmer Rouge massacres of civilians in Cambodia, and has led efforts to bring those responsible to justice. He was assisted by Joan Kakwinzere, professor of history at Makerere University, a human rights professional, and long-term member of Uganda's Commission of Inquiry into Human Rights Abuse. This report was edited by Virginia Hamilton and produced by Koula Papanicolas of the U.S.
    [Show full text]