DOCSLIB.ORG

M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument Consultation Responses April 2015 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument Consultation Responses CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Consultation topic ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Document Structure ................................................................................................................................ 3 CONDUCTING THE CONSULTATION EXERCISE ........................................................................................... 4 1.5 What the consultation was about ........................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Legislative changes ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.7 How the consultation was conducted ................................................................................................... 4 1.8 Government consultation principles ..................................................................................................... 5 SUMMARY OF RESPONSES ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.9 Number of responses ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.10 Questionnaire analysis ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.11 Respondents who did not use the questionnaire ............................................................................... 6 1.12 Support for the scheme ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.13 Comments about the proposal ............................................................................................................. 8 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................ 12 1.14 Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 12 1.15 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix A – List of Consultees ................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix B – Comments made unrelated to consultation .......................................................................... 25 Appendix C – References .............................................................................................................................. 31 M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument Consultation Responses EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The M1 junction 19 to 16 smart motorway all lane running scheme will be implemented on the Highways England’s (formerly Highways Agency) network to the design set out in Interim Advice Note 161/13. A key part of smart motorways is the use of variable mandatory speed limits (VMSL). The consultation provided an opportunity for interested parties and individuals to comment on the proposal to introduce VMSL between junctions 19 and 16 on the M1. Regulations will need to be made under section 17(2) and (3) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (“the 1984 Act”) for the implementation of VMSL for the M1 junction 19 to 16 smart motorway scheme and to enable amendments to be made to the Motorways Traffic (England and Wales) Regulations 1982 (S.I. 1982/1163) (“the 1982 Regulations”) which govern the use of motorways. A consultation paper was issued to 136 consultees and the consultation was open to public participation through the Highways Agency (now Highways England) and GOV.UK’s website. The consultation encouraged representative organisations, businesses and the general public affected by the proposed regulations to register their views with Highways England on the proposal. The 9 week consultation period began on 8th December 2014 and ended on the 30th January 2015. This paper provides a summary of the consultation responses and details how the responses have been considered and taken forward. A total of 4 responses were received during the course of the consultation, although a number of comments are beyond the scope of the consultation and have been answered. Following the consultation it is recommended that the Secretary of State proceed with making the Regulations necessary to allow for the implementation of VMSL on the M1 between junctions 19 and 16. (Explanatory note: We now refer to managed motorways as smart motorways which encompass all sections of our network that incorporate technology to manage congestion and improve journey time reliability. This includes controlling speeds through the use of VMSL to improve traffic flow and providing driver information on overhead signs.) 1 M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument Consultation Responses INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a summary of the responses received during the consultation on the implementation of VMSL as part of the M1 junction 19 to 16 smart motorway all lane running scheme. The consultation took place between 8th December 2014 and 30th January 2015 and provided an opportunity for stakeholders, such as road user groups and other interested parties to comment on the proposed implementation of VMSL between junctions 19 and 16 of the M1. Highways England (formerly the Highways Agency) has considered the comments raised by consultees and this document summarises its response to those comments. 1.2 Background The M1 junction 19 to 16 smart motorway all lane running scheme is part of the M1 junction 13-19 smart motorway, one of a number of schemes proposed in the Government SR13 announcement in June 2013. The M1 Motorway is a strategic route for local, regional and international traffic and plays a major role as: A direct motorway route between the North and the South; and A major route connecting major conurbations. The M1 between junctions 19 and 16 is part of the primary strategic link between the M1 and the M6 at Catthorpe Interchange, currently carrying traffic in excess of design levels, resulting in congestion and delays to drivers. The section for which VMSL are being consulted on is 26km (junction to junction) long and runs between junction 19 (M6) and junction 16 (Northampton). Junction 16 to 18 was originally opened in 1959, with junction 18 to 19 opening in 1965. The section has always been a dual 3 lane motorway (D3M). The M1 between junctions 19 and 16 is congested during the weekday morning and evening peak hours and also at other times when traffic flows are heavy. The average two-way daily traffic flow on the scheme section exceeds 115,000 vehicles (2013), which is over 25% higher than the Congestion Reference Flow (CRF) of around 97,000 (Average 3 lane motorway value) vehicles per day. The CRF represents the daily flow level at which a road is likely to be congested during weekday peak hours. Smart motorway schemes are commissioned and operating successfully on sections of the M42, M6 and M1 J6 to J13 locally and this scheme will continue the use of technology on the strategic road network to manage congestion and support an operational approach that maximises the use of the existing Highways England asset. 2 M1 Junction 19 to 16 Smart Motorway All Lane Running Scheme Summary of Statutory Instrument Consultation Responses 1.3 Consultation topic The introduction to the consultation document clearly stated that the scope was as follows: “We are keen to have your comments on the proposal for implementation of variable mandatory speed limits for the M1 smart motorway scheme between junctions 19 and 16; specifically on how the proposal could affect your organisation or those you represent”. Explanation of the operating regime of the smart motorway scheme and associated design features were provided in the consultation document, including a summary of the concept of Emergency Refuge Areas (ERAs). This was to assist in understanding of the scheme and not included within the scope of the consultation. “It is important to note that this is not consultation on the actual policy of using VMSL or all lane running. Use of these traffic management features is already Government policy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 July 2011 Page 1 of 17
    Radio 4 Listings for 9 – 15 July 2011 Page 1 of 17 SATURDAY 09 JULY 2011 events company Endurance Life in partnership with Natural Edwards had barely arrived in Montserrat in 1995 when the England to allow runners to take up the challenge of a long volcanic eruptions took place that were to cover most of the SAT 00:00 Midnight News (b0128qd7) distance route whenever they want to rather than as part of a island in ash. He went back 16 years later to see how life has The latest national and international news from BBC Radio 4. large event. The aim is to run as far as they would like to go, changed for both visitors and residents. Language teacher Followed by Weather. whenever they choose, and enter an electronic timing tag into Elisabeth Smith tells Sandi why the British are so bad at boxes fitted at points along the way which records their speaking foreign languages when travelling - and what they can progress. The scheme is currently operating on several of our do about it. SAT 00:30 Book of the Week (b0128l70) national trails and the organisers say that this has been created Constance: The Tragic and Scandalous Life of Mrs Oscar Wilde by a team of trail runners who feel that the joy of running is Producer: Harry Parker. increased greatly when it takes place in a stunning landscape. Episode 5 But walkers and outdoor enthusiasts are questioning the need for this scheme. Many people are concerned about the SAT 10:30 Found in Translation (b012f5qj) Written by Franny Moyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Police, Parking & Neighbourhood Plan Report
    Report for the 18 September 2017 Full Meeting of Crick Parish Council From Councillor Brian Hughes 17/332 Parking To discuss all parking issues within the parish, including parking warden visits and decide on what action needs to be taken. Enforcement by NCC Northamptonshire County Council is responsible for parking enforcement in Crick see http://www3.northamptonshire.gov.uk/councilservices/northamptonshire- highways/parking/Pages/parking-enforcement-.aspx . NCC is working in partnership with NSL Services who provide parking related services on behalf of the council. This includes the management of the Civil Enforcement Officers who are based in Northampton. A FOI request was made to obtain details of the number of visits made by Parking Enforcement Officers to Crick from 2014 to August 2017 and the number of Penalty Charge Notices (PCN) issued. The figures are attached. They show that Crick is rarely visited and that few tickets have been issued. Do we need to encourage more visits, particularly as new restrictions are about to be applied? How can we best do this? Local Initiative in Conjunction with Police To highlight the problem parking issues to offenders and reduce the problem, Sgt Sam Dobbs has suggested that we consider initiating a local scheme with the help of the Police, details as follows: 1. The Police design and print a ‘traffic advisory’ (TA) notice like a PCN. 2. TAs are affixed to cars that are problem parked on yellow lines, pavements etc. by volunteers (Councillors and others) who make a brief record i.e. Index No, Time and Place. 3. The TAs will advise the vehicle owner that the purpose of the TA is to keep the roads and community safe and they may be committing an offence.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Submission Settlements and Countryside Local Plan Part 2
    Foreword The Daventry District Settlements and Countryside Local Plan (Part 2) is a key document that will help to shape the future of the District. When this document is adopted, it will sit alongside the West Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (Adopted 2014) and made Neighbourhood Development Plans. These will collectively be the basis for helping to guide and shape the development and use of land across the District. This document is therefore very important for helping to shape the future of the District. This document is the Proposed Submission Version, which builds on the Issues and Options and Emerging Draft consultations undertaken in early 2016 and late 2017. We are grateful to everyone who responded to those consultations, your views have been taken into account in preparing this plan. This plan is based on a thorough evidence base which is set out on the Council’s website. Further details of the consultation are set out within the document including how you can respond, it is important to note that comments must relate to legal compliance and the tests of soundness and be made on the prescribed response form. The consultation also includes a series of exhibitions taking place in early September which you are encouraged to attend. Following consultation on this document, the Council will then consider the responses received before submitting the plan, the responses and other supporting information. This will be undertaken by an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State. Adoption is anticipated to take place in summer 2019. We look forward to your participation. Kind Regards Councillor Alan Chantler Strategic Planning Portfolio Holder and Chair of Local Plan Steering Group Contents Consultation Arrangements .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020-2025
    Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020–2025 March 2020 CORRECTION SLIP Title: Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020-25 Session: 2019-21 ISBN: 978-1-5286-1678-2 Date of laying: 11th March 2020 Correction: Removing duplicate text on the M62 Junctions 20-25 smart motorway Text currently reads: (Page 95) M62 Junctions 20-25 – upgrading the M62 to smart motorway between junction 20 (Rochdale) and junction 25 (Brighouse) across the Pennines. Together with other smart motorways in Lancashire and Yorkshire, this will provide a full smart motorway link between Manchester and Leeds, and between the M1 and the M6. This text should be removed, but the identical text on page 96 remains. Correction: Correcting a heading in the eastern region Heading currently reads: Under Construction Heading should read: Smart motorways subject to stocktake Date of correction: 11th March 2020 Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020 – 2025 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3 of the Infrastructure Act 2015 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at https://forms.dft.gov.uk/contact-dft-and-agencies/ ISBN 978-1-5286-1678-2 CCS0919077812 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
    [Show full text]
  • M20 Junction
    M20 Junction 10a TR010006 4.2 Funding Statement APFP Regulation 5(2)(h) Revision B Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 4 May 2017 M20 Junction 10a TR010006 4.2 Funding Statement Volume 4 This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. Date: May 2017 M20 Junction 10a Funding Statement TR010006 Issue and revision record Revision Date Description A July 2016 DCO Submission B May 2017 Revised edition to include up to date information. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Transport: a New Generation of Interchanges
    Integrated transport A new generation of interchanges www.bettertransport.org.uk Contents Executive summary Executive summary 3 Transport networks should be efficient, affordable, Funding and support accessible and comprehensive. Good modal Introduction 4 A Bus and Coach Investment Strategy is long overdue. interchanges are central to creating such networks. The Government should develop a multi-year bus Planning and interchanges 6 and coach investment strategy to sit alongside other That much of the country lacks such systems is the Case study - Thurrock 12 transport investment, such as the Road Investment result of disjointed and reductive transport planning Strategy and rail’s High Level Output Specification. Case study - Catthorpe Interchange 16 and investment. Despite in-principle support and a number of small national initiatives, there has been Case study - Luton North 19 A joint Department for Transport (DfT), Department a widespread and ongoing failure to link transport for Housing, Communities and Local Government Other opportunities for improved connectivity 23 networks and modes. The resulting over-reliance on fund should be established to support the delivery cars is engendering negative social, economic and Conclusions and recommendations 26 of national priority interchanges and to fund regional environmental ramifications. These consequences assessment of interchange opportunities. Cross- References and image credits 30 unfairly disadvantage those who do not have a car government working should also examine how better and lead to perverse spending decisions to address interchanges can contribute to policies such as the the resulting congestion. Industrial Strategy. We need a better way forward. This report makes the Infrastructure schemes funded via the Road Investment case for a new generation of transport interchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • Pick up Points
    Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Abercynon Ampthill Bakewell Aberdare Andover Baldock Aberdeen Annan Baldock Services (A1(M)) Aberdeen (ABZ) Annandale Water Services Banbury (A74(M)) Abergavenny Bangor Arbroath Abergele Banstead Armthorpe Abingdon Bargoed Arnold Abington Services (M74) Barking Arundel Accrington Barnet Ashbourne Acle Barnetby Top Services Ashburton (M180) Adlington Ashby-de-la-Zouch Barnoldswick Alcester Ashford Barnsley Alcester Oversley Mill Services (A46) Ashington Barnstaple Aldershot Ashton-in-Makerfield Barrow-in-Furness Aldridge Ashton-under-Lyne Barry Alfreton Aspatria Barton-le-Clay Alnwick Astley Barton-upon-Humber Alsager Atherstone Basildon Alton Atherton Basingstoke Altrincham Attleborough Bath Amble Audenshaw Batley Ambleside Axminster Battle Amersham Aylesbury Bawtry Amesbury Countess Ayr Beaconsfield Services (A303) Bembridge Beaconsfield Services Amesbury Solstice Park (M40) Britannia Grand Burstin Services (A303) Bebington Britannia Grand Ammanford Pont Abraham Scarborough Beccles Services (M4) Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Beckenham Birmingham Bourne Bedford Birmingham (BHX) Bournemouth Bedlington Birtley Bournemouth (BOH) Bedworth Bishop Auckland Brackley Beeston Bishop's Cleeve Bracknell Belfast (BFS) Bishop's Stortford Bradford Belper Bradford-on-Avon Birchanger Green
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Agenda
    23rd December 2013 SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE - 8TH JANUARY 2014 A special meeting of the Planning Committee will be held at 5.30 pm on Wednesday 8th January 2014 in the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Rugby. Andrew Gabbitas Executive Director Note: Members are reminded that, when declaring interests, they should declare the existence and nature of their interests at the commencement of the meeting (or as soon as the interest becomes apparent). If that interest is a pecuniary interest, the Member must withdraw from the room unless one of the exceptions applies. Membership of Warwickshire County Council or any Parish Council is classed as a non-pecuniary interest under the Code of Conduct. A Member does not need to declare this interest unless the Member chooses to speak on a matter relating to their membership. If the Member does not wish to speak on the matter, the Member may still vote on the matter without making a declaration. A G E N D A PART 1 – PUBLIC BUSINESS 1. Apologies. To receive apologies for absence from the meeting. 2. Declarations of Interest. To receive declarations of – (a) non-pecuniary interests as defined by the Council’s Code of Conduct for Councillors; (b) pecuniary interests as defined by the Council’s Code of Conduct for Councillors; and (c) notice under Section 106 Local Government Finance Act 1992 – non- payment of Community Charge or Council Tax. 3. Rugby Radio Station, A5 Watling Street, Clifton Upon Dunsmore, Rugby, CV23 0AQ Outline application for an urban extension to Rugby for up to 6,200 dwellings together
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy
    RIS investment plan commitments Road Investment Strategy: Investment Plan - list of commitments Expected Status in Expected Scheme name Map Key Region Scheme Description First announced cost Investment Plan start date category A1: Jn 67 (Coal House) to Jn 71 ( Metro Centre): increasing Yorkshire & lane capacity from two to three lanes in each direction within A1 Coal House to Metro Centre A1 Under Construction Autumn Statement 2012 £250-500m Already Started North East the highway boundary; creating parallel link roads between the Lobley Hill and Gateshead Quay junctions A1: Jn 51 (Leeming) to Jn 56 (Barton): upgrading to three lane Yorkshire & motorway standard completing the remaining non motorway A1 Leeming to Barton A2 Under Construction Autumn Statement 2012 £250-500m Already Started North East section on the strategic M1/A1(M) route between London and Newcastle Yorkshire & M1: Jn 39 (Denby Dale) to Jn 42 (M62 interchange): upgrading M1 Junctions 39-42 A3 Under Construction Spending Review 2010 £100-250m Already Started North East to Smart Motorway including hard shoulder running Yorkshire & M1: Jn 32 (M18 interchange) to 35a (A616): upgrading to M1 Junctions 32-35A A4 Under Construction Spending Review 2010 £50-100m Already Started North East Smart Motorway including hard shoulder running A19: (A1058 junction): upgrading the existing grade separated roundabout to a three level interchange to increase capacity Yorkshire & Committed - previously Early Road A19 Coast Road A5 and improve safety; together with the A19 Testos, raises the
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy: for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period
    EB/042 Road Investment Strategy: for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period March 2015 Road Investment Strategy: for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3 of the Infrastructure Act 2015 © Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474115773 Web ISBN 9781474115780 ID P2709590 03/15 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Photographic acknowledgements Part 1 – Alamy: Cover, 4, 6, 20-21, 37, 44, 51, 58. Part 2 – Alamy: 1, 4, 15, 53, 64. Part 3 – Alamy: 1, 4, 13, 31. Contents Part 1: Strategic Vision Part 2: Investment Plan Part 3: Performance Specification Part 1: Strategic Vision Contents 3 Contents 1. Foreword 5 2. Executive summary 7 3. The Strategic Road Network 12 4. Planning for the long term: trends and forecasting 22 5. Planning for the long term: pressures and challenges 38 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Assessment
    Number of Number of Alcohol refreshment off-trade Number of additional Location Name of MSA Served venues premises retailers 1 A1 (M) Baldock Services No 4 1 2 2 M40 Beaconsfield Services No 4 1 1 3 M62 Birch Services No 3 1 3 4 M11 Birchanger Green Services No 4 1 1 5 M65 Blackburn with Darwen Services No 2 1 6 A1(M) Blyth Services No 3 1 7 M5 Bridgwater Services No 3 1 8 M6 Burton-in-Kendal Services No 3 1 9 M62 Burtonwood Services No 3 1 10 A14/M11 Cambridge Services No 4 1 1 11 M4 Cardiff Gate Services Yes 2 1 1 12 M4 Cardiff West Services No 3 1 13 M6 Charnock Richard Services Yes 5 1 14 M40 Cherwell Valley Services No 4 1 1 15 M56 Chester Services No 3 1 16 M4 Chieveley Services No 3 1 1 17 M25 Clacket Lane Services No 3 1 18 M6 Corley Services No 5 19 M5 Cullompton Services No 2 1 20 M18 Doncaster North Services No 3 1 21 M1 Donington Park Services No 3 1 22 A1 (M) Durham Services No 3 1 23 M5 Exeter Services Yes 2 1 1 24 A1/M62 Ferrybridge Services No 3 1 1 25 M3 Fleet Services No 6 1 1 26 M5 Frankley Services No 3 1 1 27 M5 Gordano Services No 4 1 1 28 M62 Hartshead Moor Services No 5 1 29 M4 Heston Eastbound No 3 1 30 M4 Heston Westbound No 4 1 31 M6 Hilton Park Services No 4 1 1 32 M42 Hopwood Park Services No 4 1 1 33 M6 J38 Truckstop Yes 1 1 34 M6 Keele Services No 5 1 35 M6 Killington Lake Services No 3 1 36 M6 Knutsford Services No 4 1 1 37 M6 Lancaster (Forton) Services No 3 1 2 38 M1 Leicester (Markfield) Services No 1 39 M1 Leicester Forest East Services No 4 40 M4 Leigh Delamere Services No 6 1 4 41 M1 London Gateway
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Impacts on Motorway Interchanges
    HIGH SPEED UK : CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON MOTORWAY INTERCHANGES Introduction Massive road traffic disruption and associated major construction difficulties at motorway interchanges have always been cited as one of the key arguments against any proposed high speed rail route aligned along the M1 corridor. Whilst no study has ever been published to substantiate this claim, it has gained general acceptance as a primary reason for rejecting the M1 corridor in favour of the selected route for HS2 through the Chilterns. Development of detailed horizontal and vertical alignment designs for the M1-aligned High Speed UK proposals now allows the assertion of insuperable difficulties at interchanges to be rigorously tested. This paper reviews the proposed HSUK alignments at all of the 21 M1 interchanges and 5 service areas between London and Lutterworth, to determine the nature and extent of the asserted difficulties. Information Considered 1:25,000 scale plans have been developed to cover the full extent (circa 1,000km ) of proposed HSUK new build route, from London to Liverpool and Glasgow. This has allowed both horizontal and vertical alignments to be designed for the proposed high speed line. Extracts from this mapping are presented below, in the case studies relating to each interchange. Technical Challenges presented at Motorway Interchanges The M1 was constructed along the primary national transport corridor, followed by Romans (Watling Street), canal builders (Grand Union Canal) and railway builders (London & Birmingham Railway, now West Coast Main Line) alike. In terms of the topography encountered en route, it is by far the most favourable route between London and the Midlands (this contrasts sharply with the Chiltern-aligned M40, constructed in much more difficult terrain).
    [Show full text]