DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Transport: a New Generation of Interchanges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Transport: a New Generation of Interchanges Integrated transport A new generation of interchanges www.bettertransport.org.uk Contents Executive summary Executive summary 3 Transport networks should be efficient, affordable, Funding and support accessible and comprehensive. Good modal Introduction 4 A Bus and Coach Investment Strategy is long overdue. interchanges are central to creating such networks. The Government should develop a multi-year bus Planning and interchanges 6 and coach investment strategy to sit alongside other That much of the country lacks such systems is the Case study - Thurrock 12 transport investment, such as the Road Investment result of disjointed and reductive transport planning Strategy and rail’s High Level Output Specification. Case study - Catthorpe Interchange 16 and investment. Despite in-principle support and a number of small national initiatives, there has been Case study - Luton North 19 A joint Department for Transport (DfT), Department a widespread and ongoing failure to link transport for Housing, Communities and Local Government Other opportunities for improved connectivity 23 networks and modes. The resulting over-reliance on fund should be established to support the delivery cars is engendering negative social, economic and Conclusions and recommendations 26 of national priority interchanges and to fund regional environmental ramifications. These consequences assessment of interchange opportunities. Cross- References and image credits 30 unfairly disadvantage those who do not have a car government working should also examine how better and lead to perverse spending decisions to address interchanges can contribute to policies such as the the resulting congestion. Industrial Strategy. We need a better way forward. This report makes the Infrastructure schemes funded via the Road Investment case for a new generation of transport interchanges. Strategy (RIS) and all future rail franchises should be Taking account of technological, administrative and required to actively deliver better modal integration. social developments, it looks at both strategic and local opportunities for transport modes and services. Devolution Planning reform The creation of Combined Authorities and Sub- National Transport Bodies (SNTB) should be used The National Planning Policy Framework should be to significantly expand the integration of transport explicit in setting out the benefits of good modal planning and deliver the interchange facilities via a interchanges and their potential as hubs for sustainable review of opportunities to develop rail, bus, and coach development. There should also be detailed guidance interchanges. on planning and locating of interchanges. Goodwill toward joined-up transport provision is not The National Policy Statement on National Networks enough – more and better interchanges combined with should be amended to include passenger transport better joined-up services are required. interchanges alongside the existing information on rail freight interchanges. The National Infrastructure Commission should undertake a comprehensive assessment of appropriate locations for major interchanges. Transport options in the West Midlands 2 www.bettertransport.org.uk www.bettertransport.org.uk 3 In addition to these benefits, there are new reasons to Introduction focus on multi-modal travel. While currently loosely defined, the concept of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) An efficient transport system should be easy has the potential to transform travel. MaaS foresees and affordable to use, accessible to all, and a move away from car ownership and towards a comprehensive in the destinations it serves. model where people purchase a journey by whichever This requires well-planned infrastructure and services. mode is most efficient. Thinking has so far focused Yet too often our transport networks fail to deliver on technology needed to achieve this through better such a network. journey planning and autonomous vehicles. If it is to transform how we travel for the better, however, MaaS The reason for this is clear. Planning, operation will need to be supported by greatly improved physical and investment in individual transport modes is connections between modes. Because national and undertaken in isolation. This means much transport local government, transport operators and the bodies planning remains reductive. For example, if there is a responsible for managing our road and rail networks budget for roads then the response to a congested road rarely work together, this essential element is both will be to add more road capacity. It will not generally long overdue and requiring of urgent attention. be to identify the wider causes of the congestion nor contemplate the best transport solution to resolve it. Good interchange facilities do exist in the UK. The most well-used of these are in major conurbations where A principal casualty of the current approach is mainline rail termini meet local transport for onward interchanges. By definition, interchanges require a travel. Cities with light and suburban rail systems also joined-up approach to transport. Despite some recent often have interchange stations specially designed to attempts at more creative planning, opportunities to bring services together. link up road and rail infrastructure and services are routinely missed and often undervalued. While the above examples perform an important function, all too often they represent the full extent of Good interchanges can greatly influence the travel planned support for multimodalism. In smaller cities choices people make. Existing interchanges have and towns informal interchanges have evolved between developed for many reasons including facilitating easier Stratford Interchange, London rail and bus networks. The usefulness of these, however, access to networks, taking advantage of co-located is frequently undermined by poorly coordinated and Without planning and investment in better So, there is a clear and pressing need for better transport infrastructure, making the most efficient integrated timetabling and promotion. Rural areas fare interchanges, the absence of affordable, efficient and integration of our transport systems. If our networks use of available capacity and to support new retail and worse, often relying on sparse and slow bus networks easy to use alternatives will mean those with access to are to become more efficient and easier to access, we housing development. the funding for which is under annual pressure. a private car continue to rely on them. Those without need to move beyond a small number of showcase them will continue to be doubly disadvantaged by examples and develop many more interchange points. Depending on their location, capacity and design, Away from major cities, public transport is regularly the negative social and environmental impacts of Some of these will be strategic pieces of infrastructure, a good interchange can offer: planned as a series of independent routes, not a our over-reliance on private cars, and the inefficient bringing together major roads and rail lines. Others ● Links to a wide range of destinations employing cohesive linked network. This approach infects not only planning and spending decisions that attempt to will be simpler, offering local interchanges designed to several modes planning between modes, but planning within modes. accommodate them. meet urban, suburban and rural needs. ● Integrated travel information for ease of use For example, rail franchises rarely consider links with ● Access to good quality transport services with clear services offered by other franchises. Development and investment in existing infrastructure This research highlights why and where better routes between modes is rarely planned in ways that promote efficient use of interchanges are needed. It considers the benefits ● Local benefits such a more attractive, visited and Addressing these lost opportunities requires door networks overall. The absence of integrated planning of specific locations and looks at the role different more accessible public realm. to door planning of the type the Government and facilities causes congestion and leads to perverse organisations and policy initiatives should play in envisaged in its ‘Door to Door’ strategy of 2013 (now public spending decisions. It is the travelling public bringing more such developments about. withdrawn). More and better interchanges are a part who pay the price for this in wasted time, long or of this along with other initiatives such as integrated difficult journeys, with some even prevented from fares and ticketing. travelling at all. 4 www.bettertransport.org.uk www.bettertransport.org.uk 5 Context operations. While effective at facilitating access to The UK lacks a proactive and strategic approach to public transport, the contribution to sustainability that Example: transport integration. Despite in-principle support and such operations make is hampered by the continued Rail-based park and ride interchanges reliance on private car that they engender and their much lip service, there are often siloed structures in In recent years, a number of smaller interchanges It is also connected to the Cambridgeshire Guided limited impact on overall road mileage. coach, bus and rail industries, a lack of clear guidance based around new railway stations have been Busway. Other stations such as Edinburgh Gateway from national government and a shortage of skills and built. These have the potential to be multimodal have been conceived primarily as interchanges with We can
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling Summary And
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling 166 Roundtable Summary and Conclusions Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling Summary and Conclusions of the ITF Roundtable on Integrated and Sustainable Urban Transport 24-25 April 2017, Tokyo Daniel Veryard and Stephen Perkins with contributions from Aimee Aguilar-Jaber and Tatiana Samsonova International Transport Forum, Paris The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria,
    [Show full text]
  • (1202 Sq M) Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, Junction 10
    Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, Junction 10 M53, CH2 4HY High quality office accommodation 1,545 sq ft (144 sq m) to 12,940 sq ft (1202 sq m) Enter COLISEUM RETAIL PARK McDONALD’S CHESHIRE OAKS M53 MARKS & SPENCER SAINSBURYS HARLEY DAVIDSON Aerial Location MITCHELL GROUP LEXUS Description B5132 J10 Availability Terms A5117 Contact EPC Certificates Download Print Exit A5058 TO THE NORTH Location 10/21A M57 TO MANCHESTER 1 LIVERPOOL AND THE EAST The Oaks Office Park occupies a highly MERSEY TUNNELS 6/1 M62 BIRKENHEAD prominent position off Stanney Mill Road, A5300 WARRINGTON MANCHESTER AIRPORT immediately adjacent to Junction 10 of A561 WIDNES M53 RUNCORN BRIDGE 9/20/20A the M53 mid Wirral motorway and less N A41 LIVERPOOL JOHN RUNCORN LENNONAIRPORT than 1 mile from the M56/M53 M56 A49 interchange. Ellesmere Port and Chester A533 M6 are approximately 1 mile and 7 miles ELLESMERE PORT A550 away respectively. NORTHWICH 11/15 A533 There are a wide range of amenities A5517 A54 A56 A55 QUEENSFERRY 12 available at Cheshire Oaks including the WINSFORD TO NORTH WALES CHESTER Designer Outlet Village, the new Marks & & ANGLESEY BIRMINGHAM Spencer, Coliseum Leisure Park and the AND THE A51 SOUTH A55 Travel Lodge hotel. All are readily A494 A530 accessible from the Oaks Office Park RUTHIN A483 A51 being situated directly opposite on the CREWE A534 western side of the motorway, also served by J10. NANTWICH M53 A41 STANNEY MILL ROAD WREXHAM CHESHIRE OAKS COLISEUM WAY TO SNOWDONIA NATIONAL PARK A530 A529 STANNEY MILL LANE Aerial COLISEUM Drive Times CHESHIRE Location OAKS WAY Destination Distance Drive Time COLISEUM WAY (miles) (minutes) Description A5117 B5132 J10 Availability M56 motorway 1 2 LONGLOOMS ROAD BLUE STANNEY LANE PLANET Chester 7 10 AQUARIUM BLUE A5117 Terms PLANE M6 motorway 20 25 AQUARIUM Contact Liverpool Airport 23 32 M53 Manchester Airport 30 25 EPC Certificates Download Print Exit Description The development comprises a two storey terrace providing four self-contained office buildings with ample car parking.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • ONCAMPUS Hull Student Guide 2019-20.Pdf
    STUDENT GUIDE 2019/20 1 IMPORTANT DATES CONTENTS Academic Year 2019/20 Important dates 4 Students on all courses at ONCAMPUS Hull will follow the same term dates, as follows: Welcome 5 Term 1 23 September 2019 – 13 December 2019 Visa information 6 Holiday dates 16 December 2019 - 03 January 2020 BEFORE BEFORE What to bring with you 8 Term 2 06 January 2020 – 13 March 2020 YOU ARRIVE YOU Checklist 10 Holiday dates 16 March 2020 – 20 March 2020 Term 3 23 March 2020 – 07 June 2020 Paying your fees 11 Holiday dates (August finishers) 01 June 2020 – 05 June 2020 What to expect on arrival in the UK 14 Term 4 08 June 2020 – 14 August 2020 How to get here 15 THE UK ARRIVE IN What to do when you arrive 16 Late arrival: Please inform us of your arrival plans and flight details as soon as you have them. If you think you will arrive late you must tell us as soon as possible, as Enrolment and Induction 17 we may need to inform the UKVI. Please send all this information to admissions@ oncampus.global or call +44 (0)1223 345698. Attendance 20 Students are advised to check with the Centre Head before booking their travel back home at the end of each term. In particular it is strongly recommended that Student support and advice 21 you check with the Centre Head before booking travel home at the end of the course in case it is necessary to remain in order to receive results and be advised of next Around campus 23 steps in your study plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Tpe-Review-Of-Dppp-Letter.Pdf
    Marcus Clements Head of Consumer Policy & Compliance Telephone 020 7282 2000 E-mail [email protected] 03 October 2018 Leo Goodwin Managing Director First TransPennine Express Limited [by email] Dear Leo Review of First TransPennine Express Limited (Trading as TransPennine Express) Disabled People’s Protection Policy (Condition 5 of the Station Licence and GB Statement of National Regulatory Provisions: Passenger) Thank you for submitting your draft Disabled People’s Protection Policy (DPPP) for review. A copy of your approved DPPP is attached to this letter, and will be published on our website along with a copy of this letter. I confirm that we have reviewed your DPPP against the 2009 Guidance “How to write your Disabled People’s Protection Policy: A guide for Train and Station Operators” (the Guidance) and can confirm that your revised DPPP meets the requirements of Condition 5 of your station licence and GB Statement of National Regulatory Provisions: Passenger (SNRP). We welcome the following, which we believe are likely to be positive for passengers: Your commitment to reduced timescales for assistance booking to two hours for passengers making direct journeys between two of your own managed stations1; The provision of free car parking for blue badge holders; and Your use of assistance cards, which allow passengers with communication difficulties and hidden disabilities to communicate their assistance needs to staff. Since your DPPP was originally submitted to ORR we have had several exchanges in the intervening period in order to bring about the changes required to make it fully compliant with the Guidance. 1 We recognise that you have not been able to secure the introduction of a 2-hour notice period for booked assistance travelling on your services to or from Northern and Network Rail managed stations, as envisaged in your franchise agreement, and that this is the subject of franchise variation discussions with Rail North; if this situation changes, we would expect a revised DPPP to be submitted to us for consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • This Timetable Runs on New Year's Eve Only
    Cambridge • St Neots • Bedford • Milton Keynes • Buckingham • Bicester • Oxford NEW YEAR’S EVE Cambridge Parkside bay 16 0710 0740 0810 40 10 Madingley Road Park & Ride bay 2 0722 0752 0822 52 22 Loves Farm Cambridge Road 0740 0810 0840 10 40 St Neots Cambridge Street 0743 0813 0843 13 43 St Neots Market Square stop D arr. 0750 0820 0850 20 50 same coach - no need to change St Neots Market Square stop D dep. 0750 0820 0850 20 50 Eaton Socon Field Cottage Road 0754 0824 0854 24 54 Great Barford Golden Cross 0801 0831 0901 THEN 31 01 Goldington Green Barkers Lane 0811 0841 0911 AT 41 11 Bedford Bus Station stop N arr. 0819 0849 0919 THESE 49 19 TIMES UNTIL Bedford stop N 0430 0500 0530 0600 0630 0700 0730 0800 0830 0900 0930 00 320 Bus Station dep. PAST Milton Keynes Coachway bay 1 arr. 0456 0526 0556 0626 0656 0726 0756 0826 0856 0926 0956 EACH 26 56 same coach - no need to change HOUR Milton Keynes Coachway bay 1 dep. 0501 0531 0601 0631 0701 0731 0801 0831 0901 0931 1001 31 01 Central Milton Keynes stop H4 0513 0543 0613 0643 0713 0743 0813 0843 0913 0943 1013 43 13 Milton Keynes Rail Station stop Z4 0525 0555 0625 0655 0725 0755 0825 0855 0925 0955 1025 55 25 Buckingham High Street bus stand arr. 0547 0617 0647 0717 0747 0817 0847 0917 0947 1017 1047 17 47 same coach - no need to change Buckingham High Street bus stand dep. 0547 0617 0647 0717 0747 0817 0847 0917 0947 1017 1047 17 47 Bicester Bus Station stand 3 0515 0645 0715 0745 0815 0845 0915 0945 1015 1045 1115 45 15 Oxford Bus Station stop 11 0645 0715 0745 0815 0845 0915 0945 1015 1045 1115 1145 15 45 NEW YEAR’S EVE Cambridge Parkside bay 16 1440 1510 1540 1610 1710 1725 1740 1810 1840 1910 1940 2010 2030 Madingley Road Park & Ride bay 2 1452 1522 1552 1622 1722 1737 1752 1822 1852 1922 1952 2022 2042 Loves Farm Cambridge Road 1510 1540 1610 1640 1740 1755 1810 1840 1910 1940 2010 2040 2100 St Neots Cambridge Street 1513 1543 1613 1643 1743 1758 1813 1843 1913 1943 2013 2043 2103 St Neots Market Square stop D arr.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Element
    Town of Cary Comprehensive Transportation Pllan Chapter 6 – Introduction At the time of the 2001 Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the Town of Cary had no bus service other than Route 301 operated by the Triangle Transit Authority (TTA). Since then, Cary has expanded its transit Transit services considerably, with a new local fixed-route service for the public and demand-responsive paratransit for seniors and persons with disabilities. TTA has added routes as well. As the Town’s Element population continues rising and travel demand increases, the Town plans to expand its local service, capturing riders coming from and going to planned residential and commercial developments. Situated amidst the Research Triangle of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, Cary is served today by multiple transit providers. Fixed route bus services within Cary are provided by C-Tran and TTA. C-Tran, Wake Coordinated Transportation Services (WCTS), and the Center for Volunteer Caregiving provide demand-responsive paratransit services. WCTS also provides rural general public transit via its TRACS service program; however, services are not provided for urban trips within Cary. Amtrak operates daily train service. This chapter describes current fixed-route transit and paratransit conditions, projected growth in the Town, and proposed future service changes. C-Tran Overview C-Tran is the Town of Cary’s sponsored transit service which originated as a door-to-door service for seniors and disabled residents in 2001. In July 2002, door-to-door services were expanded
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham Interchange Station a High Speed Transport Hub
    BIRMINGHAM INTERCHANGE STATION A HIGH SPEED TRANSPORT HUB Phase 2 of High Speed Two (HS2) will create a ‘Y network’ from Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds, as part of strengthening connections between the South East and the Northern Powerhouse. To avoid a lengthy diversion via central Birmingham and reduce congestion with intercity freight, a new interchange station will be built nine miles east of the city near Solihull, allowing services to diverge and connect to the North West and the North East. In line with the Government’s plans to level up the economy across Britain, Birmingham Interchange Station will improve connectivity for local residents and provide a catalyst for investment not only in the West Midlands but nationwide. April 2021 A452 WHAT IS BIRMINGHAM INTERCHANGE STATION? Birmingham Interchange Station is a critical part of the HS2 network, which will bring the West Midlands within an hour’s commute of London, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, York, Preston, and Wigan. It consists of three projects across a 370-acre site: a new rail gateway for the • Interchange Station: NATIONAL region that will serve up to 38,000 passengers per EXHIBITION CENTRE day, along two 415-metre platforms BIRMINGHAM AIRPORT • Automated People Mover: a new short-distance BIRMINGHAM transit system allowing up to 2,100 passengers per BIRMINGHAM INTERCHANGE AIRPORT BIRMINGHAM STATION hour to travel between the NEC, Birmingham Airport STOP INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY STATION and other local transport hubs NEC STOP HS2 • Local Road Improvements: improvements to the local road network, with four new highway bridges BIRMINGHAM MAINTENANCE INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED FACILITY strengthening connections between existing routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020-2025
    Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020–2025 March 2020 CORRECTION SLIP Title: Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020-25 Session: 2019-21 ISBN: 978-1-5286-1678-2 Date of laying: 11th March 2020 Correction: Removing duplicate text on the M62 Junctions 20-25 smart motorway Text currently reads: (Page 95) M62 Junctions 20-25 – upgrading the M62 to smart motorway between junction 20 (Rochdale) and junction 25 (Brighouse) across the Pennines. Together with other smart motorways in Lancashire and Yorkshire, this will provide a full smart motorway link between Manchester and Leeds, and between the M1 and the M6. This text should be removed, but the identical text on page 96 remains. Correction: Correcting a heading in the eastern region Heading currently reads: Under Construction Heading should read: Smart motorways subject to stocktake Date of correction: 11th March 2020 Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020 – 2025 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3 of the Infrastructure Act 2015 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at https://forms.dft.gov.uk/contact-dft-and-agencies/ ISBN 978-1-5286-1678-2 CCS0919077812 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond Now We’Removing Informing, Engaging and Inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond
    Essex Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond now we’removing informing, engaging and inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond ‘I cannot think of a higher priority for the County Council than for it to strive to achieve a first class highways and transportation system for all who live in, work in or visit the county of Essex. The challenges in front of us are enormous. Over 130,000 new homes are being proposed for Essex and its borders with surrounding authorities, the travel needs of which will have a direct impact on the transport network in Essex. All aspects of passenger transport will play a key role in delivering this vision. The County Council has therefore produced three daughter strategies to support the Local Transport Plan, focusing on how passenger transport will contribute towards a fully integrated transport network. The Road Passenger Transport, Bus Information and Rail Strategies outline the ways in which we intend to improve the lives of Essex people by addressing traffic growth, road congestion and improving public transport. They contain measures aimed at improving options for travel and access to services to develop a more effective transport network. To produce the strategies the County Council has consulted widely at regional, district and parish level, with key service providers, a wide range of user groups and the general public so that collectively they represent a tangible commitment by Essex County Council to make our County a better place to live and work and to support a decent public transport network. I am committed to delivering a transport system that meets the challenges we face in Essex and look forward to working in partnership with stakeholders to bring about the transformation we now need.’ Councillor Rodney L.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Rail Station Access in Australia
    Improving Rail Station Access in Australia CRC for Rail Innovation [insert date] Page i Improving Rail Station Access in Australia DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Document: CRC for Rail Innovation Old Central Station, 290 Ann St. Title: Improving Rail Station Access in Australia Brisbane Qld 4000 Project Leader: Phil Charles GPO Box 1422 Brisbane Qld 4001 Authors: Ronald Galiza and Phil Charles Tel: +61 7 3221 2536 Project No.: R1.133 Fax: +61 7 3235 2987 Project Name: Station Access www.railcrc.net.au Synopsis: This document on improving rail station access in Australia is the main document for the CRC project on Station Access. The document reviews Australian and international planning guides to identify key elements important in planning for station access. Best practice elements were identified for inclusion in an access planning methodology for the Australian context. An evaluation framework featuring a checklist of station access principles associated with each access mode is provided to assess existing station access. Case studies are presented from Brisbane, Perth, and Sydney so as to illustrate the framework. This document presents a new perspective for Australian rail agencies, including access in the overall design process and provides a best practice approach, building on available station access-related planning in Australia and developments in Europe and North America. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE ACADEMIC REVIEW INDUSTRY REVIEW APPROVAL NUMBER (PROGRAM LEADER) (PROJECT CHAIR) (RESEARCH DIRECTOR) 0 23 September 2013 DISTRIBUTION REVISION DESTINATION 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Industry x Participant for Review Established and supported under the Australian Government’s cooperative Research Centres Programme Copyright © 2013 This work is copyright.
    [Show full text]