Agnosia and Prosopagnosia: Same Object

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agnosia and Prosopagnosia: Same Object Problems in achieving object recognition: 1. Need to solve the "image segmentation problem": Need to distinguish between objects and their surroundings, and identify which parts belong to the Agnosia and prosopagnosia: same object. Often difficult because luminance differences may be an unreliable guide. 2. Need to identify the object, perceptually: 3. Need to identify the object, semantically: Need to recognise an object despite changes in its For familiar objects, need to access stored appearance due to changes in illumination, knowledge about their functions and meanings (e.g. viewpoint, distance, etc. "this is a chair", "I can sit on it", "this is a lecturer"). So, need to be able to generalise across views. But - may also have to distinguish between different exemplars within a category (e.g. different faces). 4. Other aspects of object recognition: Need to know an object's location, relative to other objects and to ourselves. 1 Visual agnosia: Wilbrand (1887): the case of Fraulein G.: Impairment of visual perception due to brain Stroke, aged 63. damage, which is not attributable to sensory Remained able to speak several foreign languages, impairment or gross intellectual impairment recite poetry; highly articulate. ("agnosia" lit. "without knowledge"). "When people stood at my bedside and spoke with pity of my blindness, I thought to myself: you can't really be blind because you are able to see the table-cloth over there, with the blue border, spread out on the table in the sick-room". Mistook a dog for the doctor. Mistook a servant for the dinner-table. The case of Fraulein G. (continued): Lissauer (1890): Topographical agnosia: unable to recognise familiar Studied G.L., who following a head injury, had problems recognising objects – mistook pictures for boxes, jacket places. for trousers, couldn’t recognise cutlery. Vision was intact, Object agnosia: unable to see her favourite vase, find as was his memory of objects. letters she had written, or her glasses. Lissauer distinguished two main types of "...at night I take any old object from the table and think; "mindblindness" (agnosia): my God, what sort of thing is this then?, and only after Apperceptive agnosia: protracted and repeated looking at it and palpating of it Impaired ability to consciously perceive and discriminate does it become clear to me what it is meant to be". stimuli (i.e. a perceptual deficit). Associative agnosia: Prosopagnosia (inability to recognise familiar faces) Relatively preserved ability to perceive stimuli, but including her own face in a mirror. inability to interpret what was seen (i.e., a gnostic deficit). Remained capable of visual imagery. 2 Apperceptive agnosia: Apperceptive agnosia: Typically impairments can be seen in: Can describe features of an object, but Mr. S copying, and matching: Gollin’s incomplete drawing test cannot recognise the (Warrington & James 1967). object as a whole. Cannot copy Ghent’s overlapping / embedded figures drawings. test (DeRenzi, Scotti & Spinnler 1969). Perceptual not sensory deficit (acuity Unusual views task (Warrington & Taylor 1973). etc. normal). Impaired recognition if Foreshortened photos (Humphreys & image is degraded in Riddoch 1984). any of a number of ways. Milner & Goodale (1995): Apperceptive agnosia - pathology: D.F. : apperceptive agnosic, due to CO poisoning. Spatial frequency detection thresholds normal except for low frequencies. Unilateral right hemisphere damage. Right Flicker frequency threshold normal. inferior parietal lobe. Colour discrimination normal. Object recognition grossly impaired. Cannot recognise or copy drawings of objects. Object memory intact (i.e., perceptual deficit). 3 Associative agnosia: Underlying pathology in associative agnosia: Can discriminate objects but not LF copying identify them. Usually bilateral damage. Crucial area thought to Can copy drawings. be left hemisphere. More ventral than Not a perceptual deficit. apperceptive damage. May even be able to sort objects by category. Cannot name objects and may not be able to understand their meaning. May not be able to draw objects from memory. Make structural rather than functional matches between objects (e.g. closed umbrella matched to walking stick, not open umbrella – Warrington 1982). Modality specificity of agnosia: Modality specificity of agnosia: Impairment in object recognition may be confined to a single sensory modality: visual agnosics are unimpaired in recognition by touch, hearing or smell. Can have agnosia in other modalities (e.g. auditory agnosia). Ability to act upon and manipulate objects may be intact in agnosics – e.g. DF. DF posting task: Cannot match using perceptual information alone, but can match orientation when asked to "post" the object. (Parallel effects now found in normal individuals). 4 “What” and “Where” systems: Category specific agnosias: (Ungerleider and Mishkin 1982, Goodale and Milner 1995): McCrae and Trolle (1956): severe impairment for Ventral stream: "what": Dorsal stream: "where": recognition of animals; unimpaired for trees, flowers, Output from V1 to V2, V4 Output from V1 to V2, V3 common objects. and IT. (Inferotemporal and MT (V5). (Posterior Hecaen & Ajuriaguerra (1956): inanimate more cortex). parietal cortex). impaired than animate. Primary function is object Primary function is spatial Warrington & Shallice (1984): JBR - animate perception + recognition. perception. impaired, but not inanimate. Warrington & McCarthy (1987) YOT - object matching impaired, but animals matching unimpaired. Prosopagnosia - specific inability to recognise faces, but OK with non-face objects. Implications of neuropsychological data for Elllis and Young's (1988) model of object recognition: normal perception: OBJECT Early ideas on agnosia More modern conceptions (e.g. Farah 1990, (Lissauer 1890): Humphreys and Riddoch 1987): Initial representation IMAGE IMAGE Viewer-centred representation FEATURAL ANALYSIS FEATURE INTEGRATION AND GROUPING Object-centred Object recognition units APPERCEPTION representation MAPPING OF PERCEPTUAL DESCRIPTIONS TO STORED STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS Semantic system ASSOCIATION (must cope with unusual views, etc.) STORED STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS Name retrieval (speech output lexicon) SEMANTIC KNOWLEDGE (object functions and associations) SPOKEN NAME 5 Conclusions: Neuropsychological data suggest that (a) vision is modular - a set of processes, for different purposes. (b) location and identification are handled by largely separate, parallel processes - from retina through to cortex. (c) object recognition can be selectively impaired at many stages, from initial structural description (apperceptive agnosia) to linking with semantic information (associative agnosia). (d) the same is true for face recognition; there are many different causes of "prosopagnosia". 6.
Recommended publications
  • Sciencedirect.Com Sciencedirect
    cortex 89 (2017) 135e155 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cortex Research report Agnosic vision is like peripheral vision, which is limited by crowding Francesca Strappini a,b,c, Denis G. Pelli d, Enrico Di Pace a and * Marialuisa Martelli a,b, a Department of Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy b Neuropsychology Research Centre, IRCCS Foundation Hospital Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy c Neurobiology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel d Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA article info abstract Article history: Visual agnosia is a neuropsychological impairment of visual object recognition despite Received 23 April 2014 near-normal acuity and visual fields. A century of research has provided only a rudimen- Reviewed 14 July 2014 tary account of the functional damage underlying this deficit. We find that the object- Revised 24 October 2014 recognition ability of agnosic patients viewing an object directly is like that of normally- Accepted 13 January 2017 sighted observers viewing it indirectly, with peripheral vision. Thus, agnosic vision is Action editor Jason Barton like peripheral vision. We obtained 14 visual-object-recognition tests that are commonly Published online 1 February 2017 used for diagnosis of visual agnosia. Our “standard” normal observer took these tests at various eccentricities in his periphery. Analyzing the published data of 32 apperceptive Keywords: agnosia patients and a group of 14 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) patients on these tests, Visual agnosia we find that each patient's pattern of object recognition deficits is well characterized by one Crowding number, the equivalent eccentricity at which our standard observer's peripheral vision is like Object recognition the central vision of the agnosic patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Emotional Sequelae Post Stroke
    11/26/2019 The Neuropsychology of Objectives 1. Identify various cognitive sequelae that may result from stroke Stroke: Cognitive & 2. Explain how stroke may impact emotional functioning, both acutely and long-term Emotional Sequelae COX HEALTH STROKE CONFERENCE BRITTANY ALLEN, PHD, ABPP, MBA 12/13/2019 Epidemiology of Stroke Stroke Statistics • > 795,000 people in the United States have a stroke • 5th leading cause of death for Americans • ~610,000 are first or new strokes • Risk of having a first stroke is nearly twice as high for blacks as whites • ~1/4 occur in people with a history of prior stroke • Blacks have the highest rate of death due to stroke • ~140,000 Americans die every year due to stroke • Death rates have declined for all races/ethnicities for decades except that Hispanics have seen • Approximately 87% of all strokes are ischemic an increase in death rates since 2013 • Costs the United States an estimated $34 billion annually • Risk for stroke increases with age, but 34% of people hospitalized for stroke were < 65 years of • Health care services age • Medicines to treat stroke • Women have a lower stroke risk until late in life when the association reverses • Missed days of work • Approximately 15% of strokes are heralded by a TIA • Leading cause of long-term disability • Reduces mobility in > 50% of stroke survivors > 65 years of age Source: Centers for Disease Control Stroke Death Rates Neuropsychological Assessment • Task Engagement • Memory • Language • Visuospatial Functioning • Attention/Concentration • Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Prosopagnosia by B
    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1959, 22, 124. PROSOPAGNOSIA BY B. BORNSTEIN and D. P. KIDRON From the Department of Neurology, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tiqva, Israel "And what is the nature of this knowledge or recollection? I mean to ask, Whether a person, who having seen or heard or in any way perceived anything, knows not only that, but has a conception of something else which is the subject, not of the same but of some other kind of knowledge, may not be fairly said to recollect that of which he has the conception?" "And when the recollection is derived from like things, then another consideration is sure to arise, which is, Whether the likeness in any degree falls short or not of that which is recollected?" "The Philosophy of Plato " Phaedo (the Jowett translation). Does visual agnosia exist in a partial or isolated bances in sensation time, in adaptation time, in form, in which certain qualities only are affected, visual acuity, and in brightness discrimination. as opposed to generalized visual agnosia? Many Ettlinger (1956) rejected Bay's contentions. After workers cast doubt on this concept, maintaining analysing 30 cases of head injury, he showed that that partial visual agnosia is no more than a com- some patients had neither field nor perceptual bination of defects in vision, memory, and orienta- defects, others had field but not perceptual defects, tion, appearing together. and only in eight of the 30 patients were field and The clinical elucidation of partial visual agnosia perceptual defects found together. It is true that is likely to be affected by the patient's intellectual visual agnosia is frequently associated with homony- capacity, his mental state at the time of examination, mous hemianopsia, but despite this there are cases and his ability to cooperate without being influenced of hemianopsia without gnostic defects.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Lose Memories of Faces? Content Specificity and Awareness in a Prosopagnosic
    Can We Lose Memories of Faces? Content Specificity and Awareness in a Prosopagnosic Nancy L. Etcoff Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology Neuropsychology Laboratory Massachusetts General Hospital Downloaded from http://mitprc.silverchair.com/jocn/article-pdf/3/1/25/1755723/jocn.1991.3.1.25.pdf by guest on 18 May 2021 Roy Freeman Division of Neurology New England Deaconess Hospital Beth Israel Hospital Harvard Medical School Kyle R. Cave Department of Psychology University of California, San Diego Abstract H Prosopagnosia is a neurological syndrome in which patients nonfacial channels. The only other categories of shapes that he cannot recognize faces. Kecently it has been shown that some has marked trouble recognizing are animals and emotional prosopagnosics give evidence of “covert” recognition: they expressions, though even these impairments were not as severe show greater autonomic responses to familiar faces than to as the one for faces. Three measures (sympathetic skin re- unfamiliar ones, and respond differently to familiar faces in sponse, pupil dilation, and learning correct and incorrect learning and interference tasks. Although some patients do not names of faces) failed to show any signs of covert face recog- show covert recognition, this has usually been attributed to an nition in LH, though the measures were sensitive enough to “apperceptive” deficit that impairs perceptual analysis of the reflect autonomic reactions in LH to stimuli other than faces, input. The implication is that prosopagnosia is a deficit in access and face familiarity in normal controls. Thus prosopagnosia to, or awareness of, memories of faces: the inducing brain cannot always be attributed to a mere absence of awareness injury does not destroy the memories themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Abadie's Sign Abadie's Sign Is the Absence Or Diminution of Pain Sensation When Exerting Deep Pressure on the Achilles Tendo
    A.qxd 9/29/05 04:02 PM Page 1 A Abadie’s Sign Abadie’s sign is the absence or diminution of pain sensation when exerting deep pressure on the Achilles tendon by squeezing. This is a frequent finding in the tabes dorsalis variant of neurosyphilis (i.e., with dorsal column disease). Cross References Argyll Robertson pupil Abdominal Paradox - see PARADOXICAL BREATHING Abdominal Reflexes Both superficial and deep abdominal reflexes are described, of which the superficial (cutaneous) reflexes are the more commonly tested in clinical practice. A wooden stick or pin is used to scratch the abdomi- nal wall, from the flank to the midline, parallel to the line of the der- matomal strips, in upper (supraumbilical), middle (umbilical), and lower (infraumbilical) areas. The maneuver is best performed at the end of expiration when the abdominal muscles are relaxed, since the reflexes may be lost with muscle tensing; to avoid this, patients should lie supine with their arms by their sides. Superficial abdominal reflexes are lost in a number of circum- stances: normal old age obesity after abdominal surgery after multiple pregnancies in acute abdominal disorders (Rosenbach’s sign). However, absence of all superficial abdominal reflexes may be of localizing value for corticospinal pathway damage (upper motor neu- rone lesions) above T6. Lesions at or below T10 lead to selective loss of the lower reflexes with the upper and middle reflexes intact, in which case Beevor’s sign may also be present. All abdominal reflexes are preserved with lesions below T12. Abdominal reflexes are said to be lost early in multiple sclerosis, but late in motor neurone disease, an observation of possible clinical use, particularly when differentiating the primary lateral sclerosis vari- ant of motor neurone disease from multiple sclerosis.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT of the PATIENT with EARLY DEMENTIA S Cooper, J D W Greene V15
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2005.081133 on 16 November 2005. Downloaded from THE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH EARLY DEMENTIA S Cooper, J D W Greene v15 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76(Suppl V):v15–v24. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.081133 ementia is a clinical state characterised by a loss of function in at least two cognitive domains. When making a diagnosis of dementia, features to look for include memory Dimpairment and at least one of the following: aphasia, apraxia, agnosia and/or disturbances in executive functioning. To be significant the impairments should be severe enough to cause problems with social and occupational functioning and the decline must have occurred from a previously higher level. It is important to exclude delirium when considering such a diagnosis. When approaching the patient with a possible dementia, taking a careful history is paramount. Clues to the nature and aetiology of the disorder are often found following careful consultation with the patient and carer. A focused cognitive and physical examination is useful and the presence of specific features may aid in diagnosis. Certain investigations are mandatory and additional tests are recommended if the history and examination indicate particular aetiologies. It is useful when assessing a patient with cognitive impairment in the clinic to consider the following straightforward questions: c Is the patient demented? c If so, does the loss of function conform to a characteristic pattern? c Does the pattern of dementia conform to a particular pattern? c What is the likely disease process responsible for the dementia? An understanding of cognitive function and its anatomical correlates is necessary in order to ascertain which brain areas are affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosopagnosia: a Clinical, Psychological, and Anatomical Study of Three Patients
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.40.4.395 on 1 April 1977. Downloaded from Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1977, 40, 395-403 Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients A. M. WHITELEY' AND ELIZABETH K. WARRINGTON From the Department ofNeurology, The London Hospital, and the Department ofPsychology, National Hospital, Queen Square, London SUMMARY Three patients with prosopagnosia are described of whom two had right occipital lesions. An analysis of visual and perceptual functions demonstrated a defect in perceptual classi- fication which appeared to be stimulus-specific. A special mechanism for facial recognition is postu- lated, and the importance of the right sided posterior lesion is stressed. Prosopagnosia is a rare but interesting condition unreliably, as pointers to cerebral lesions, and most in which recognition of faces is impaired. The cases have a left homonymous defect indicating right sufferer is quite unable to identify people purely by hemisphere disease, but not excluding a left sided their facial appearance but can do so without lesion (Meadows, 1974a). There are many cases, Protected by copyright. difficulty by their voice and by visual clues such as however, with bilateral field defects indicating clothing, hair colour, and gait. Recognition of other bilateral lesions, but there are cases with right visual material can be intact, but in some cases highly homonymous defects and cases with no field defects discriminative visual skills, such as species of birds at all. There are several case reports where surgery and types of fruit, are impaired (Bornstein, 1963; to right temporal and occipital lobes is responsible, De Renzi et al., 1968).
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Problems After Brain Injury
    Visual problems after brain injury As a charity, we rely on donations from people like you to continue providing free information to people affected by brain injury. Donate today: www.headway.org.uk/donate Introduction Vision is the skill that allows us to see the world around us. When we look at the world, a complex series of processes takes place between the eyes and the brain. The eyes take in the information, while the brain (which is connected to the eyes by a nerve called the optic nerve) is responsible for processing and interpreting it. Through this system we are able to see things such as colours, shapes, movement, objects and people. When the brain is injured, the ability to interpret visual information can be affected in different ways. This factsheet has been written to explain how brain injury can affect vision and how to seek professional support with these issues. Tips for coping with visual problems are also offered. Words in bold are defined in a glossary at the end of the factsheet. What is vision? There are lots of different aspects of vision. Some of the things the brain needs to do to decode information that it receives from the eyes are: • process the shape and colour of objects • process and merge information received from both eyes • recall information from memory to recognise objects or places • process the movement of objects • process the location and position of an object in space • process information across the visual field (including peripheral vision) Generally, different parts of the brain are responsible for processing these different aspects of vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Disorders of the Visual System in Alzheimer's Disease
    © 1990 Raven Press, Ltd.. New York Disorders of the Visual System in Alzheimer's Disease Mario F. Mendez, M.D., Robert L. Tomsak, M.D., Ph.D., and Bernd Remler, M.D. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with distur­ Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent bances in basic visual, complex visual, and oculomotor form of dementia affecting greater than 2.5 million functions. The broad range of visual system disorders in AD may result from the concentration of neuropathol­ people in the U.S., with the numbers expected to ogy in visual association cortex and optic nerves in this double by the year 2040 (1). Despite the absence of disease. AD patients and their caregivers frequently re­ a clinical test for AD, the recent establishment of port visuospatial difficulties in these patients. Examina­ highly accurate clinical criteria permit a more pre­ tion of the visual system in AD may reveal visual field cise evaluation of the deficits associated with this deficits, prolonged visual evoked potentials, depressed contrast sensitivities, and abnormal eye movement re­ disorder (2-4) (see Table 1). In addition to the cordings. Complex visual disturbances include construc­ usual memory and other cognitive deficits, AD pa­ tional and visuoperceptual abnormalities, spatial agno­ tients have disturbances in basic visual, complex sia and Balint's syndrome, environmental disorienta­ visual, and oculomotor functions, and AD patients tion, visual agnosia, facial identification problems, and in greater numbers are undergoing more thorough visual hallucinations. The purpose of this article is to review the spectrum of visual system disturbances evaluations of their visual systems (4-8).
    [Show full text]
  • DISORDERS of AUDITORY PROCESSING: EVIDENCE for MODULARITY in AUDITION Michael R
    DISORDERS OF AUDITORY PROCESSING: EVIDENCE FOR MODULARITY IN AUDITION Michael R. Polster and Sally B. Rose (Psychology Department, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand) ABSTRACT This article examines four disorders of auditory processing that can result from selective brain damage (cortical deafness, pure word deafness, auditory agnosia and phonagnosia) in an effort to derive a plausible functional and neuroanatomical model of audition. The article begins by identifying three possible reasons why models of auditory processing have been slower to emerge than models of visual processing: neuroanatomical differences between the visual and auditory systems, terminological confusions relating to auditory processing disorders, and technical factors that have made auditory stimuli more difficult to study than visual stimuli. The four auditory disorders are then reviewed and current theories of auditory processing considered. Taken together, these disorders suggest a modular architecture analogous to models of visual processing that have been derived from studying neurological patients. Ideas for future research to test modular theory more fully are presented. Key words: auditory processing, modularity, review INTRODUCTION Neuropsychological investigations of patients suffering from brain damage have flourished in recent years and helped to produce more detailed and neuroanatomically plausible models of several aspects of cognitive function. For example, models of language processing are often closely aligned with studies of aphasia (e.g., Caplan, 1987; Goodglass, 1993) and models of memory draw heavily upon studies of amnesia (e.g., Schacter and Tulving, 1994; Squire, 1987). Most of this research has relied on visually presented materials, and as a result visual processing disorders tend to be more well-documented and better understood than their auditory counterparts.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 Aphasia, Memory Loss, Hemispatial Neglect, Frontal Syndromes and Other Cerebral Disorders - - 8/4/17 12:21 PM )
    1 Aphasia, Memory Loss, 26 Hemispatial Neglect, Frontal Syndromes and Other Cerebral Disorders M.-Marsel Mesulam CHAPTER The cerebral cortex of the human brain contains ~20 billion neurons spread over an area of 2.5 m2. The primary sensory and motor areas constitute 10% of the cerebral cortex. The rest is subsumed by modality- 26 selective, heteromodal, paralimbic, and limbic areas collectively known as the association cortex (Fig. 26-1). The association cortex mediates the Aphasia, Memory Hemispatial Neglect, Frontal Syndromes and Other Cerebral Disorders Loss, integrative processes that subserve cognition, emotion, and comport- ment. A systematic testing of these mental functions is necessary for the effective clinical assessment of the association cortex and its dis- eases. According to current thinking, there are no centers for “hearing words,” “perceiving space,” or “storing memories.” Cognitive and behavioral functions (domains) are coordinated by intersecting large-s- cale neural networks that contain interconnected cortical and subcortical components. Five anatomically defined large-scale networks are most relevant to clinical practice: (1) a perisylvian network for language, (2) a parietofrontal network for spatial orientation, (3) an occipitotemporal network for face and object recognition, (4) a limbic network for explicit episodic memory, and (5) a prefrontal network for the executive con- trol of cognition and comportment. Investigations based on functional imaging have also identified a default mode network, which becomes activated when the person is not engaged in a specific task requiring attention to external events. The clinical consequences of damage to this network are not yet fully defined. THE LEFT PERISYLVIAN NETWORK FOR LANGUAGE AND APHASIAS The production and comprehension of words and sentences is depen- FIGURE 26-1 Lateral (top) and medial (bottom) views of the cerebral dent on the integrity of a distributed network located along the peri- hemispheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Transient Gerstmann Syndrome As Manifestation of Stroke Case Report and Brief Literature Review
    Dement Neuropsychol 2017 June;11(2):202-205 Case Report doi: 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-020013 Transient Gerstmann syndrome as manifestation of stroke Case report and brief literature review Rafael Batista João1, Raquel Mattos Filgueiras2, Marcelo Lucci Mussi3, João Eliezer Ferri de Barros4 ABSTRACT. Gerstmann Syndrome (GS) is a rare neurological condition described as a group of cognitive changes corresponding to a tetrad of symptoms comprising agraphia, acalculia, right-left disorientation and finger agnosia. It is known that some specific brain lesions may lead to such findings, particularly when there is impairment of the angular gyrus and adjacent structures. In addition, the possibility of disconnection syndrome should be considered in some cases. The purpose of this article is to report a case of a young, cardiac patient, non-adherent to treatment, who presented with a stroke in which transient clinical symptoms were compatible with the tetrad of GS. The case report is followed by a discussion and brief review of the relevant literature. Key words: Gerstmann syndrome, disconnection syndrome, insular cortex, parietal lobe, frontal lobe. SÍNDROME DE GERSTMANN TRANSITÓRIA COMO MANIFESTAÇÃO DE ACIDENTE VASCULAR ENCEFÁLICO: RELATO DE CASO E BREVE REVISÃO DE LITERATURA RESUMO. A síndrome de Gerstmann (SG) é uma condição neurológica rara, caracterizada por um grupo de alterações cognitivas que correspondem a uma tétrade composta por agrafia, acalculia, desorientação direita-esquerda e agnosia para dedos. Sabe-se que certas lesões encefálicas específicas podem levar a tais achados, particularmente quando ocorre acometimento do giro angular e estruturas adjacentes. Além disso, a possibilidade de síndrome de desconexão deve ser considerada em alguns casos.
    [Show full text]