DOCSLIB.ORG

Cooperative National Parks Resources Studies Unit Department of Botany University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (808) 948-8218

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cooperative National Parks Resources Studies Unit Department of Botany University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (808) 948-8218 COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARKS RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA HONOLULU, HAWAII 96822 (808) 948-8218 TECHNICAL REPORT #lo HALAPE MARINE SURVEY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONTRACT #CX8000 6 0031 Contribution #: (This work carried out under CPSU Year 02.) Clifford W. Smith, Unit Director The National Park Service and the University of Hawaii signed the memorandum of agreement establishing this Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit on March 16, 1973- The unit provides a multidisciplinary approach to studies on the biological resources in the National Parks in Hawaii, that is, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Haleakala National Park, City of Refuge National Historical Park and Puukohola National Historic Site. Through the Unit Director, projects are undertaken in areas identified by park management. These studies provide information that will facilitate the development and implementation of resource management programs. The involvement of University faculty and students in the resource management of the National Parks in Hawaii lends to a greater awareness of the problems and needs of the Service. At the same time research not directly or immediately applicable to management is also encouraged through the Unit. A SURVEY OF THE MARINE ORGANISMS AT HALAPE, HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK FREDERICK W. BALL DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII 3190 MAILE WAY HONOLULU, HI 96822 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ........................................... i Introduction ...................................... 1 Material and Methods .............................. 8 Results ........................................... 12 Discussion ........................................ 16 References ........................................ 19 Appendix A . Local..Common.. Scientific Names of Fish Seen at Halapz-Hawaii during a previous survey .............................. 21 Appendix B . Species list of organisms collected .................................... 27 Bibliography ...................................... 49 Acknowledgements .................................. 51 PREFACE This report of the survey of the marine resources at ~ala~ewas- conducted July 17-23, 1975. Since that time the area has been severely disturbed by natural phenomena. The November 29, 1975 earthquake, (Richter Scale magnitude 8.4), generated a small tsunami which claimed the lives of two people and also severely disturbed the marine flora and fauna at ~alape. Many animals and some plant material were either crushed or left stranded on land. However, this destruction was minor com with the gross change in the habitat brought about by the land subsidence during the earthquake and in the following weeks. The land in the ~alaperegion has sunk approximately eleven feet. The benthic environment in the area will not recover for some years as the newly submerged land surface is colonized and the previously submerged regions adapt and change in response to their greater depth. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the conditions at ~alapebefore and after the earthquake. There was no volcanic activity in the ~alapearea. Though this report presents information about an area whose features have been radically altered by nature, the results contained herein are still of considerable significance for resource management purposes. The report is the first compre- hensive qualitative inventory of marine organisms along the coastline of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. As such it wfll form the basis for future resource inventory studies in the area and all consequent ecological studies that may be necessary for resource management. Some work on the colonization of the newly submerged coastline is already being sponsored by the CPSU UH. Fig. 1. An aerial photograph of the ~ala~gcoastline Hawaii Volcanoes National Park prior to the November 29, 1975 earthquake. Keaoi Island is in the left foreground. (Photo by R. Holcomb, USGS # 1-16-75/Frame 12). Fig. 2. An aerial photograph of the Halape coastline Hawaii Volcanoes National Park after the November 29th, 1975 earthquake. Keaoi Island is just to the bottom left hand corner; only a small portion is left exposed(not shown in this photograph). Note the position of the coastline with respect to the Halaps Coconut Grove and the small pali hehind. (Official photograph of USQS taken by Boone Morrison). Introduction The Hawaii Volcanoes National Park coastal boundaries extend eastward from Lalahana, near the Great Crack, to Kupapau Point, which is located about 3.5 miles West of Kalapana (Fig. 3). The region surveyed covered an area approximately 0.5 mile East of Keaoi Island to 1.75 mi. West of it (Fig. 4). A base camp was established at Halap5 (Lat. N. 19' 16' 24", Long. W. 155' 15' 37"), a very attractive site amidst very bleak surroundings. Although its coastline is located leeward of the prevailing trade winds, refraction of the westward setting waves is sufficient to create moderately exposed conditions. The waves have gnawed away at and eroded the lava-formed coastline, fashioning it into myriad forms that take the shape of arches, jagged spires, subterranean caves, pot holes and the like. Primarily due to its remoteness and somewhat harsh physical and topographical conditions, the marine environment along the approximately 30-mile stretch of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park coastline has received little attention. Studies of potential value, beneficial not only to the National Park Service but also to the scientific community as well, consist of (1) faunal and floral successlon studies on recent lava flows, and (2) an assessment of the degree of human impact on coastal organisms, such as mollusks, opihi in particular, and fish. Fig. 3. Location of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park in the Hawaiian Islands. UlYtTBb STATES Ib# Fig. 4. Location of the ~alapeStudy Area in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. KAU DE:S€RT HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK Pobbwr Po# 6 By determining the diversity and density of the marine fauna and flora the management of the resources in the area will be improved. In addition, the National Park Service is interested in expanding its jurisdiction to 0.25 miles off- shore. Hence, the concern to survey the coastline in terms of its marine organisms. At present, the National Park Service exercises control over those lands within its bound- aries extending down to the mean high tide mark. Beyond this point the State has juri$diction out to the 3 mile limit. The human impact within the National Park's jurisdiction of the coastline is well known. There are historical records that the Hawaiians made extensive use of certain parts of the coastline between Puna and Kafu. The physical remains of several hundred sites of ancient villages, heiaus, petroglyphs, shelter caves and other displays of ancient native habitation are present in the area. Major archaeological sites have been located mostly towards the Kalapana end of the National Park's boundaries at such locations as Pulu Loa, Kamoamoa, Ka'ili'ili and Wahaula. In general, perhaps because of the ruggedness of the coastline betweenpunaand Kalu, the population of ancient Polynesians was rather sparse west of the Kalapana Extension. 1 For the most part, the majority of the population 2 of this rugged region was only transient. During historic times, there has been a steady decline in the population of this area. In the mid 18001s Keauhou Landing was a landing place for tourists visiting Kilauea 7 Volcano. During this period Keauhou consisted of a fairly large village and steamship port until it was destroyed in 1868 by a tsunami (tidal wave). This port was also used by the pulu (a fern product) factory located on the trail between Makaopuhi and Napau Craters .' The loss of the land- ing place at Keauhouwas the beginning of the end. The area reverted to a status of basic subsistance and the population dwindled. Previous collections in the area Hartman (1966) compiled a list of polychaete annelids found in the Hawaiian Islands, including collections from ~ala~emade by Hiatt and Brock. Of the total number of polychaete species collected by Hiatt and Brock, 36 were identified as being found in the ~alapearea. Seven of these species, Phyllodoce madeirensis, Platynereis dumerilii, Eunice afra, Mesochaetopterus sagittarius, Polyopthalmus pictus, Ly~damisnesiotes and Nicolea gracilibranchis, were collected during the present study; the remaining 15 species are new records for Halape. The discrepancy in the species found can be accounted for by differences in collecting techniques and the time of year when sampled. Doty (1966) eonducted a preliminary survey of the seaweeds at Kalapana and vicinity and identified about 40 species of micro- and macro- types of algae. By comparison, of the 40 species of macrobenthic algae collected at Halaps, only 9 were of the same species. The difference in species 8 composition between the two areas is probably the result of habitat difference; the Kalapana Coast is an area of rugged cliffs exposed to the full force of the waves whereas at ~alapethere are many sheltered areas. In April of 1973, Major made some brief observations on the various kinds of reef fish located between Keaoi Island and the beach. The results of his observations were filed with the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Library in an unpublished report and are summarized in this report in Appendix A. Undoubtedly, there are other such "preliminary1' surveys that have been conducted by various individuals on the maiine biota of this region, the results of which are probably
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cip Generation Project 2016 Community Benefits Program Reef Fish Monitoring Project Year 9 Results
    CIP GENERATION PROJECT 2016 COMMUNITY BENEFITS PROGRAM REEF FISH MONITORING PROJECT YEAR 9 RESULTS Prepared For: Environmental Department Hawaiian Electric P.O. Box 2750 Honolulu, Hawaii 96840-0001 Prepared By: Richard Brock, Ph.D. Environmental Assessment, LLC 1232 Lunalilo Home Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96825 EA,LLC Report No. 2017-07 March 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The development of an electrical generating facility at Campbell Industrial Park (CIP) Barbers Point was the impetus to initiate a quarterly environmental monitoring program to follow changes, if any, in coral reef fish communities in the Barbers Point - Kahe Point area. This document is the ninth annual report for this effort covering the period from December 2007 through December 2016 with a focus on the surveys completed in 2016. On a quarterly basis, this study monitors the status of coral reef fish communities at sixteen permanently marked sites offshore of Barbers Point on the southeast to Nanakuli Beach Park about 7.9 km to the northwest. These 16 monitoring stations are in waters from 5 to 12 m in depth and thus are subject to impact from high surf events. Survey work in 2016 was hampered by inclement weather. The 2016 surveys were completed on 15 April (1st quarter), 5 July (2nd quarter) and 18 August (3rd quarter). The first and fourth quarter work could not be completed in a timely fashion due to poor weather conditions due to the protracted El Nino event that created a record number of major storms (15 in all) and generating prolonged high surf events as they passed by the Hawaiian Islands in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida
    Field Guide to the Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States goverment. Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Florida Integrated Science Center 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, FL 32653 [email protected] James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, NC 28516 [email protected] Lad Akins Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF) 98300 Overseas Highway Key Largo, FL 33037 [email protected] Suggested Citation: Schofield, P. J., J. A. Morris, Jr. and L. Akins. 2009. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. Field Guide to Nonindigenous Marine Fishes of Florida Pamela J. Schofield, Ph.D. James A. Morris, Jr., Ph.D. Lad Akins NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 92. September 2009 United States Department of National Oceanic and National Ocean Service Commerce Atmospheric Administration Gary F. Locke Jane Lubchenco John H. Dunnigan Secretary Administrator Assistant Administrator Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ i Methods .....................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • W7192e19.Pdf
    click for previous page 952 Shrimps and Prawns Sicyoniidae SICYONIIDAE Rock shrimps iagnostic characters: Body generally Drobust, with shell very hard, of “stony” grooves appearance; abdomen often with deep grooves and numerous tubercles. Rostrum well developed and extending beyond eyes, always bearing more than 3 upper teeth (in- cluding those on carapace); base of eyestalk with styliform projection on inner surface, but without tubercle on inner border. Both upper and lower antennular flagella of similar length, attached to tip of antennular peduncle. 1 Carapace lacks both postorbital and postantennal spines, cervical groove in- distinct or absent. Exopod present only on first maxilliped. All 5 pairs of legs well devel- 2 oped, fourth leg bearing a single well-devel- 3rd and 4th pleopods 4 single-branched oped arthrobranch (hidden beneath 3 carapace). In males, endopod of second pair 5 of pleopods (abdominal appendages) with appendix masculina only. Third and fourth pleopods single-branched. Telson generally armed with a pair of fixed lateral spines. Colour: body colour varies from dark brown to reddish; often with distinct spots or colour markings on carapace and/or abdomen - such colour markings are specific and very useful in distinguishing the species. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: All members of this family are marine and can be found from shallow to deep waters (to depths of more than 400 m). They are all benthic and occur on both soft and hard bottoms. Their sizes are generally small, about 2 to 8 cm, but some species can reach a body length over 15 cm. The sexes are easily distinguished by the presence of a large copulatory organ (petasma) on the first pair of pleopods of males, while the females have the posterior thoracic sternites modified into a large sperm receptacle process (thelycum) which holds the spermatophores or sperm sacs (usually whitish or yellowish in colour) after mating.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Water Spawning by Moorish Idols and Orangespine Surgeonfish in Palau: Is It a “Suicide Mission”?
    aqua, International Journal of Ichthyology Blue Water Spawning by Moorish Idols and Orangespine Surgeonfish in Palau: Is it a “Suicide Mission”? Mandy T. Etpison1 and Patrick L. Colin2 1) Etpison Museum, PO Box 7049, Koror, Palau 96940. Email: [email protected] 2) Coral Reef Research Foundation, PO Box 1765, Koror, Palau 96940. Email: [email protected] Received: 13 December 2017 – Accepted: 05 March 2018 Keywords am Morgen zu den Laichplätzen, schlossen sich zu Gruppen Predation, aggregation, feeding frenzy, gray reef shark, zusammen und bewegten sich über der Rifffläche auf und lunar periodicity. ab und zogen dabei die Aufmerksamkeit von Beutegreifern auf sich. Um die Mittagszeit steigen sie vom Riff auf und Abstract begeben sich ins freie Wasser jenseits vom Riff. Graue Spawning aggregations of the moorish idol (MI) and or- Riffhaie folgen ihnen, greifen sie an der Oberfläche an und angespine surgeonfish (OSS) were found on the western verzehren viele von ihnen in einem Fressrausch. Ein hoher barrier reef of Palau. MI aggregated around the first quar- Prozentsatz der aufsteigenden erwachsenen HF wird von ter moon from Dec. to Mar., with largest groups in Jan. den Haien gefressen, nur wenige können in die sichere Zone and Feb. Fish arrived near the sites in the morning, des Riffs zurückkehren. KD versammeln sich in denselben grouped together and moved up and down the reef face up Monaten, aber in der Zeit des letzten Mondviertels – wobei in late morning attracting the attention of predators. At es hierüber weniger Berichte gibt. Die Beobachtungen bei mid-day they ascend from the reef out into open water beiden Fischarten, dass sie weit nach oben steigen und sich away from the reef.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Functional Groups of Herbivorous Reef Fishes As Indicators of Coral Reef Resilience a Practical Guide for Coral Reef Managers in the Asia Pacifi C Region
    Monitoring Functional Groups of Herbivorous Reef Fishes as Indicators of Coral Reef Resilience A practical guide for coral reef managers in the Asia Pacifi c Region Alison L. Green and David R. Bellwood IUCN RESILIENCE SCIENCE GROUP WORKING PAPER SERIES - NO 7 IUCN Global Marine Programme Founded in 1958, IUCN (the International Union for the Conservation of Nature) brings together states, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique world partnership: over 100 members in all, spread across some 140 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. The IUCN Global Marine Programme provides vital linkages for the Union and its members to all the IUCN activities that deal with marine issues, including projects and initiatives of the Regional offices and the six IUCN Commissions. The IUCN Global Marine Programme works on issues such as integrated coastal and marine management, fisheries, marine protected areas, large marine ecosystems, coral reefs, marine invasives and protection of high and deep seas. The Nature Conservancy The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. The Conservancy launched the Global Marine Initiative in 2002 to protect and restore the most resilient examples of ocean and coastal ecosystems in ways that benefit marine life, local communities and economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mollusks from Bougainville and Florida, Solomon Islands
    ^^ FIELDIANA • ZOOLOGY 3 Published by CHICAGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Volume 39 October 17, 1958 No. 20 MARINE MOLLUSKS FROM BOUGAINVILLE AND FLORIDA, SOLOMON ISLANDS Alan Solem Assistant Curator, Division of Lower Invertebrates My checklist of the Solomon Island marine and fresh-water mol- lusks (Solem, 1953) was based on a large collection donated to Chicago Natural History Museum by Captain J. M. Ross and sup- plemented by a series of records in the literature. Two small collec- tions of marine shells given to the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology add to our knowledge of the fauna, and the additional data are reported below. I did not communicate with Dr. C. E. Fox, who presented the shells to Captain Ross, until after the checklist had been published. Dr. Fox then informed me that all the shells he gave to Captain Ross were found near Guadalcanal and Malaita Islands. The local- ity "Solomon Islands" cited by me (Solem, 1953) for the Fox col- lection should be restricted to "Guadalcanal and Malaita." Since September, 1952, when my manuscript (Solem, 1953) was submitted, the checklist of Kuroda and Habe (1952), the semi-pop- ular book of Kira (1955), and the ecological study of Demond (1957) have brought to my attention a number of nomenclatural changes affecting the names used by me (Solem, 1953) . These changes in no way alter the taxonomic position of the genera and species—only the names applied to the units. Both below, and in a report on the New Hebridean marine fauna (Solem, in press), a number of nomen- clatural changes are recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Marine Ornamental Shrimps (Decapoda: Stenopodidea and Caridea) from the Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu, India
    12 6 2010 the journal of biodiversity data 7 December 2016 Check List NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 12(6): 2010, 7 December 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.6.2010 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors New records of marine ornamental shrimps (Decapoda: Stenopodidea and Caridea) from the Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu, India Sanjeevi Prakash1, 3, Thipramalai Thangappan Ajith Kumar2* and Thanumalaya Subramoniam1 1 Centre for Climate Change Studies, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 600119, Tamil Nadu, India 2 ICAR - National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, Dilkusha Post, Lucknow - 226002, Uttar Pradesh, India 3 Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Marine ornamental shrimps found in from coral reefs have greatly affected their diversity and tropical coral reef waters are widely recognized for the distribution (Wabnitz et al. 2003). aquarium trade. Our survey of ornamental shrimps in Among all the ornamental shrimps, Stenopus the Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu (India) has found three spp. and Lysmata spp. are the most attractive and species, which we identify as Stenopus hispidus Olivier, extensively traded organisms in the marine aquarium 1811, Lysmata debelius Bruce, 1983, and L. amboinensis industry (Calado 2008). Interestingly, these shrimps are De Man, 1888, based on morphology and color pattern. associates of fishes, in particular, the groupers and giant These shrimps are recorded for the first time in Gulf of moray eels (Gymnothorax spp.). These shrimps display a Mannar, Tamil Nadu.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Fishes from the Hawaiian Islands!
    Pacific Science (1980), vol. 34, no. 3 © 1981 by The University Press of Hawaii. All rights reserved New Records of Fishes from the Hawaiian Islands! JOHN E. RANDALL 2 ABSTRACT: The following fishes represent new records for the Hawaiian Islands: the moray eel Lycodontis javanicus (Bleeker), the frogfish Antennarius nummifer (Cuvier), the jack Carangoides ferdau (Forssk::U), the grouper Cromileptes altivelis (Cuvier) (probably an aquarium release), the chubs Kyphosus cinerascens (Forsskal) and K. vaigiensis (Quoy and Gaimard), the armorhead Pentaceros richardsoni Smith, the goatfish Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal) (a probable unintentional introduction by the Division of Fish and Game, State of Hawaii), the wrasse Halichoeres marginatus Ruppell,' the gobies Nemateleotris magnifica Fowler and Discordipinna griessingeri Hoese and Fourmanoir, the angelfish Centropyge multicolor Randall and Wass, the surgeonfish Acanthurus lineatus (Linnaeus), the oceanic cutlassfish Assurger anzac (Alexander), and the driftfish Hyperoglyphe japonica (Doderlein). In addition, the snapper Pristipomoides auricilla (Jordan, Evermann, and Tanaka) and the wrasse Thalassoma quinquevittatum (Lay and Bennett), both overlooked in recent compilations, are shown to be valid species for the Hawaiian region. Following Parin (1967), the needlefish Tylosurus appendicu­ latus (Klunzinger), which has a ventral bladelike bony projection from the end of the lower jaw, is regarded as a morphological variant of T. acus (Lacepede). IN 1960, W. A. Gosline and V. E. Brock modified by Randall and Caldwell (1970). achieved the difficult task of bringing the fish Randall (1976) reviewed the additions to, fauna of the Hawaiian Islands into one com­ and alterations in, the nomenclature of the pact volume, their Handbook of Hawaiian Hawaiian fish fauna to 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group
    The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND FISHERIES CATCHES OF THE PITCAIRN ISLAND GROUP M.L.D. Palomares, D. Chaitanya, S. Harper, D. Zeller and D. Pauly A report prepared for the Global Ocean Legacy project of the Pew Environment Group by the Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Daniel Pauly RECONSTRUCTION OF TOTAL MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS (1950-2009) ...................................................................................... 3 Devraj Chaitanya, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller DOCUMENTING THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY OF THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS THROUGH FISHBASE AND SEALIFEBASE ..................................................................................... 10 Maria Lourdes D. Palomares, Patricia M. Sorongon, Marianne Pan, Jennifer C. Espedido, Lealde U. Pacres, Arlene Chon and Ace Amarga APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 1: FAO AND RECONSTRUCTED CATCH DATA ......................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTED CATCH BY MAJOR TAXA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Monitoring and 4Th MC Measures Group Workshop (2Nd Marine Measures Working Group Meeting)
    Appendix H Finalizing the Regional MPA Monitoring Protocol: Coral Reef Monitoring and 4th MC Measures Group Workshop (2nd Marine Measures Working Group Meeting) WORKSHOP REPORT 6 – 9 February, 2012 Koror State Government Assembly Hall/ Palau International Coral Reef Center Conference Room Koror, Palau Appendix H TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... ii Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... iv Acronyms ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. v List of Participants…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....... vi Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... viii Background …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… 1 Workshop objectives, outputs & deliverables……………………………………………………………………………... 2 Workshop Report ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........... 3 DAY 1 Opening Remarks by Mrs. Sandra S. Pierantozzi, Chief Executive Officer, PICRC……….………………… 3 MC Workshop Background & Introduction (Dr. Yimnang Golbuu, PICRC).………………………..………….. 3 I. CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FOR CORAL REEF MONITORING Session 1: Capacity Enhancement Project for Coral Reef Monitoring (CEPCRM) 1. Update on CEPCRM since 2010 (Dr. Seiji Nakaya, JICA)…………………………………………. 4 II. REGIONAL MPA MONITORING PROTOCOL Session 2: Marine Monitoring Protocol 2. Introduction of the Marine Monitoring Protocol (Dr. Yimnang Golbuu, PICRC) ……. 5 Session 3: Jurisdictional Updates 3. Presentations from all MC states on ecological & socioeconomic monitoring since 2010.…
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes Collected During the 2017 Marinegeo Assessment of Kāne
    Journal of the Marine Fishes collected during the 2017 MarineGEO Biological Association of the ā ‘ ‘ ‘ United Kingdom assessment of K ne ohe Bay, O ahu, Hawai i 1 1 1,2 cambridge.org/mbi Lynne R. Parenti , Diane E. Pitassy , Zeehan Jaafar , Kirill Vinnikov3,4,5 , Niamh E. Redmond6 and Kathleen S. Cole1,3 1Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 159, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA; 2Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Original Article Singapore 117543, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore; 3School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai‘iatMānoa, 2538 McCarthy Mall, Edmondson Hall 216, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; 4Laboratory of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Cite this article: Parenti LR, Pitassy DE, Jaafar Aquatic Organisms, Far Eastern Federal University, 8 Sukhanova St., Vladivostok 690091, Russia; 5Laboratory of Z, Vinnikov K, Redmond NE, Cole KS (2020). 6 Fishes collected during the 2017 MarineGEO Genetics, National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Vladivostok 690041, Russia and National Museum of assessment of Kāne‘ohe Bay, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Natural History, Smithsonian Institution DNA Barcode Network, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 183, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA the United Kingdom 100,607–637. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0025315420000417 Abstract Received: 6 January 2020 We report the results of a survey of the fishes of Kāne‘ohe Bay, O‘ahu, conducted in 2017 as Revised: 23 March 2020 part of the Smithsonian Institution MarineGEO Hawaii bioassessment. We recorded 109 spe- Accepted: 30 April 2020 cies in 43 families.
    [Show full text]