DOCSLIB.ORG

The Greatest Story in the Annals of Jewish Book Collecting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Greatest Story in the Annals of Jewish Book Collecting The Greatest Story in the Annals of Jewish Book Collecting The Greatest Story in the Annals of Jewish Book Collecting By Jeremy Brown Jeremy Brown is the author of New Heavens and a New Earth; The Jewish Reception of Copernican Thought. He writes on science, medicine and the Talmud at Talmudology.com As we approach the end of Masechet Yevamot in the Daf Yomi cycle, it seems appropriate to reflect on a legendary story in the annals of Jewish bibliography. This story involves King Henry VIII, the laws of Yevamot, and the greatest private Jewish library in the world. About thirty years ago, while a medical student in London, I had the good fortune of visiting the Valmadonna Trust Library, that greatest of private Jewish libraries. (How I got there is another story for another time). And while there, I held the Talmud that certainly once belonged to Westminster Abbey. It may also have been owned by Henry VIII, who had brought a Bomberg Talmud from Venice in order to help him end his marriage to Catherineof Aragon, the first of his many wives. The story of Henry VIII’s purchase of the Bomberg Talmud – the first complete printed Talmud – actually hinges on Yevamot, and whether the rules of levirate marriage, or yibum, applied to him. Catherine of Aragon was actually a widow, having first been married to Henry’s younger brother Arthur. About six months after Catherine married Arthur he died childless, and in 1509 his older brother Prince Henry married his widow. One more thing to know: Catherine claimed that her marriage to Arthur had never been consummated; this is important later in the story. (And here is an interesting historic footnote: it was Catherine’s parents, Ferdinand and Isabella who had expelled the Jews from Spain.) By 1525, Prince Henry had become King Henry VIII, and has had one daughter with Catherine. He wanted a son, and now wished to marry Ann Boleyn. There was, however, a problem: what was he to do with Catherine, his existing wife? Divorce, remember, was tricky for this Catholic King. And here is where the Talmud comes in. Henry argued that his marriage to Catherine should be dissolved since it was biblically forbidden for a man to marry his sister-in-law. (Henry claimed years earlier that he could marry her because the marriage to his brother had not been consummated. See, I told you that was important information…) But as we from Masechet Yevamot, the Bible commands a man to marry his widowed sister-in-law if his brother died without children. Since Arthur died childless, it could be argued that Henry was now fulfilling the biblical requirement of levirate marriage – known as yibum. If that was the case, the marriage was kosher and could not be dissolved How was this conundrum to be resolved? Let’s have Jack Lunzer, the custodian of the library, tell the story. (You can also see the video here. Sorry about the ads. They are beyond our control.) As Lunzer tells us, the Talmud was obtained from Venice to help King Henry VIII find a way to divorce his wife (and former sister-in-law) Catherine, and so be free to marry Ann Boleyn. In fact, it’s a little bit more complicated than that. Behind the scenes were Christian scholars who struggled to reconcile the injunction against a man marrying his sister- in-law found in one part of the Bible, with the command to do so under specific circumstances, found in another. In fact the legality of Henry’s marriage had been in doubt for many years, which is why Henry had obtained the Pope’s special permission to marry. John Stokesley, who later became Bishop of London, argued that the Pope had no authority to override the word of God that forbade a man from marrying his brother’s wife. As a result the dispensation the Pope had given was meaningless, and Henry’s marriage was null and void. In this way, Henry was free to marry. But what did Stokesley do with the passages in Deuteronomy that require yibum? He differentiated between them. The laws in Leviticus, he claimed, were both the word of God and founded on natural reason. In this way they were moral laws; hence they applied to both Jew and Christian. In contrast, the laws found in Deuteronomy, were judicial laws, which were ordained by God to govern (and punish) the Jews – and the Jews alone. They were never intended to apply to any other people, and so Henry’s Christian levirate marriage to Catherine was of no legal standing. There was therefore no impediment for Henry to marry Ann. As you can imagine, this rather pleased the king. It remains unclear whether the Valmadonna Library Bomberg Talmud is indeed the very same one that Henry had imported from Venice. According toSotheby’s and at leastone academic, it actually came from the library of an Oxford professor of Hebrew, who bequeathed it to the Abbey. In any event, a Bomberg Talmud lay undisturbed at Westminster Abbey for the next four hundred years. How Lunzer obtained it for his library is possibly the greatest story in the annals of Jewish book collecting. In the 1950s there was an exhibition in London to commemorate the readmission of the Jews to England under Cromwell. Lunzer noted that one of the books on display, from the collection of Westminster Abbey, was improperly labeled, and was in fact a volume of a Bomberg Talmud. Lunzer called the Abbey the next day, told them of his discovery, and suggested that he send some workers to clean the rest of the undisturbed volumes. They discovered a complete Bomberg Talmud in pristine condition, and Lunzer wanted it. But despite years of negotiations with the Abbey, Lunzer’s attempts to buy the Talmud were rebuffed. Then in April 1980, Lunzer’s luck changed. He read in a brief newspaper article that the original 1065 Charter of Westminster Abbey had been purchased by an American at auction, but because of its cultural significance the British Government was refusing to grant an export license. Lunzer called the Abbey, was invited for tea, and a gentleman’s agreement was reached. He purchased the Charter from the American, presented it to the Abbey, and at a ceremony in the Jerusalem Chamber of Westminster Abbey the nine volumes of Bomberg’s Babylonian Talmud were presented to the Valmadonna Trust. It’s a glorious story, and it’s so much better when Lunzer himself tells it, as he does here: (You can also see the video here,and end it at 14.35. We continue to apologize for those ads.) The Valmadonna Trust Library – all of its 13,000 books and manuscripts, including the Westminster Abbey Talmud, is now on sale at Sotheby’s in New York. It can be yours for about $35 million. But if you buy it, you must agree totwo conditions set by Lunzer: that the Library remain whole, and that it be made available to scholars. In that way, just as I once held that magical Talmud, others may continue to do so. Abraham’s Chaldean Origins and the Chaldee Language ABRAHAM’S CHALDEAN ORIGINS AND THE CHALDEE LANGUAGE by Reuven Chaim (Rudolph) Klein Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein is the author of the newly publishedLashon HaKodesh: History, Holiness, & Hebrew [available here]. His book is available online and in bookstores in Israel and will arrive to bookstores in America in the coming weeks. Rabbi Klein published articles in various journals including Jewish Bible Quarterly, Kovetz Hamaor, and Kovetz Kol HaTorah. He is currently a fellow at the Kollel of Yeshivas Mir in Jerusalem and lives with his wife and children in Beitar Illit, Israel. He can be reach via email: [email protected]. For the purposes of this discussion, we shall divide the region of Mesopotamia (the area between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers) into two sub-regions: the southern region known as Sumer (Shinar in the Bible) and the northern region known as Aram. Under this classification, Sumer incudes Babylon and the other cities which Nimrod (son of Cush son of Ham) built and ruled in southern Mesopotamia (Gen. 10:8–10). The northern Mesopotamian region of Aram includes the city ofAram Naharaim, also known as Harran, and Aram Zoba, also known as Aleppo (Halab). Both regions of Mesopotamia shared Aramaic as a common language. ABRAHAM WAS BORN IN SUMERIAN UR In painting the picture of Abraham’s background, most Biblical commentators assume that Abraham was born in Ur and that his family later migrated northwards to Harran. The Bible (Gen. 11:28; 11:31; 15:7; Neh. 9:7) refers to the place of Abraham’s birth as Ur“ Kasdim,” literally “Ur of the Chaldeans.” Academia generally identifies this city with the Sumerian city Ur (although others have suggested different sites).[1] According to this version of the narrative, Abraham’s family escaped Ur and relocated to Aram in order to flee from the influence of Nimrod. The reason for their escape is recorded by tradition: Nimrod—civilization’s biggest sponsor of idolatry—sentenced Abraham to death by fiery furnace for his iconoclastic stance against idolatry.[2] After Abraham miraculously emerged unscathed from the inferno, his father Terah decided to relocate the family from Ur (within Nimrod’s domain) to the city of Harran in the Aram region, which was relatively free from Nimrod’s reign of terror (Gen. 11:31). It was from Harran that Abraham later embarked on his historic journey to the Land of Canaan (Gen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky 25/12/07 15:51
    "The Revealed End": Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky 25/12/07 15:51 "The Revealed End": Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook and his son Zvi Yehudah Kook from Torat Eretz Yisrael: The Teachings of HaRav Tzvi Yehuda HaCohen Kook by Rabbi Shlomo Chaim HaCohen Aviner, translated by Tzvi Fishman, http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/revealed_end.html Page 1 sur 94 "The Revealed End": Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky 25/12/07 15:51 by Rabbi Shlomo Chaim HaCohen Aviner, translated by Tzvi Fishman, Torat Eretz Yisrael Publications, Jerusalem, 1991 from the book Messianism, Zionism, and Jewish Religious Radicalism 1996 pages 79-144 Translated by Michael Swirsky and Jonathan Chipman University of Chicago Press Originally published as Kets ha-meguleh u-medinat ha-Yehudim. Am Oved Publishers, Tel Aviv, 1993 Also available from Amazon.com The Table of Contents can be found at the end of this document and also by clicking the section headings. "A Messianic Reality" How is it that the movement for concrete redemption in our time, including the settlement and conquest of the Land [of Israel] and the abandonment and abolition of exilic existence, did not originate with the religious? How is it that some religious spokesmen even withheld their support for Zionism and the movement for redemption? . They failed to recognize that it was not that we mortals were forcing the End, but rather that the Master of the House, the Lord of the http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/revealed_end.html
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/26/2021 08:33:03AM This Is an Open Access Article Distributed Under the Terms of the CC by 4.0 License
    Vetus Testamentum 70 (2020) 55–66 Vetus Testamentum brill.com/vt Language, Exegesis, and Creative Writing in Chronicles Jan Joosten University of Oxford [email protected] Abstract is well-known in the meaning “to disguise oneself,” but this meaning התחפש The verb does not seem to fit its context in 2 Chron 35:22. Why would Josiah disguise himself when going to battle with Necho? In this paper it will be argued that the verb was bor- rowed from the story on Micah ben Yimlah (1 Kgs 22:30) in the course of the Chronicler’s reshaping of Josiah in the image of Ahab, but that its semantics reflect a later interpre- tation of some elements in that story. The later interpretation is attested independently ”.is rendered as “to arm oneself התחפש in the Peshitta and the Vulgate where Keywords intertextuality – pseudo-classicism – theological interpretation 1 Introduction Hebraists like H. L. Ginsberg have described the history of Biblical Hebrew as the succession of a “Golden Age,” corresponding to the monarchic period, and a “Silver Age” during and after the Babylonian exile.1 In more recent writing, such evaluative terms are frowned upon.2 Indeed, the aesthetic judgment runs 1 See H. L. Ginsberg, “The Northwest Semitic Languages,” The World History of the Jewish People. First Series: Ancient Times, vol. 2 Patriarchs (Edited by Benjamin Mazar; Tel-Aviv: Massada, 1970), 102–224, 112. 2 See Mark F. Rooker, Biblical Hebrew in Transition: The Language of the Book of Ezekiel (JSOTS 90. Sheffield: JSOT, 1990), 14. © Jan Joosten, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15685330-12341422 Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 08:33:03AM This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • “Foremost in Rank and Foremost in Power”: Conflict Over the First-Born in Israel
    "FOREMOST IN RANK AND FOREMOST IN POWER": CONFLICT OVER THE FIRST-BORN IN ISRAEL HARVEY SICHERMAN & GILAD J. GEVARYAHU When the patriarch Jacob blessed his children on the verge of his death, he described Reuben as 'My first-born, first of my strength, first of my vitality . foremost in rank and foremost in power' (Gen. 49:4). But he disqualified Reuben for reasons of personality ( unstable as water [49:4]) and for his act 1 of consorting with Bilhah, Jacob's concubine (35:22). Moreover, Jacob did not assign Reuben's privileges to one other son, but rather to three other sons. As the Targum Jonathan (49:3) writes, "The birthright was given to Jo- seph." Jacob had earlier made clear that Joseph's two sons, Ephraim and Ma- nasseh, would be regarded as his own, thus giving to the first-born son of his 2 favorite wife, Rachel, the double portion usually accorded to the eldest son. Furthermore, in the course of that earlier blessing, Jacob elevated Ephraim, the younger son, above his older brother Manasseh, despite Joseph's protest. Secondly, the Targum notes that "the kingship was given to Judah." In the long discourse popularly known as the Blessing of Jacob, the patriarch as- signed Judah the right to rule (49:9-10), exalting his strength and promising that, the scepter shall not depart from Judah until he come to Shiloh, and to 3 him will assemble all the nations, (49:10). Finally, the Targum concludes "the priesthood was given to Levi." Each of these reassignments was linked to physical location: Joseph to She- chem, Judah to Shiloh, and Levi to the place that the Lord thy God will choose from among all the tribes to place His name there.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Prize
    Year Winner Discipline 1953 Gedaliah Alon Jewish studies 1953 Haim Hazaz literature 1953 Ya'akov Cohen literature 1953 Dina Feitelson-Schur education 1953 Mark Dvorzhetski social science 1953 Lipman Heilprin medical science 1953 Zeev Ben-Zvi sculpture 1953 Shimshon Amitsur exact sciences 1953 Jacob Levitzki exact sciences 1954 Moshe Zvi Segal Jewish studies 1954 Schmuel Hugo Bergmann humanities 1954 David Shimoni literature 1954 Shmuel Yosef Agnon literature 1954 Arthur Biram education 1954 Gad Tedeschi jurisprudence 1954 Franz Ollendorff exact sciences 1954 Michael Zohary life sciences 1954 Shimon Fritz Bodenheimer agriculture 1955 Ödön Pártos music 1955 Ephraim Urbach Jewish studies 1955 Isaac Heinemann Jewish studies 1955 Zalman Shneur literature 1955 Yitzhak Lamdan literature 1955 Michael Fekete exact sciences 1955 Israel Reichart life sciences 1955 Yaakov Ben-Tor life sciences 1955 Akiva Vroman life sciences 1955 Benjamin Shapira medical science 1955 Sara Hestrin-Lerner medical science 1955 Netanel Hochberg agriculture 1956 Zahara Schatz painting and sculpture 1956 Naftali Herz Tur-Sinai Jewish studies 1956 Yigael Yadin Jewish studies 1956 Yehezkel Abramsky Rabbinical literature 1956 Gershon Shufman literature 1956 Miriam Yalan-Shteklis children's literature 1956 Nechama Leibowitz education 1956 Yaakov Talmon social sciences 1956 Avraham HaLevi Frankel exact sciences 1956 Manfred Aschner life sciences 1956 Haim Ernst Wertheimer medicine 1957 Hanna Rovina theatre 1957 Haim Shirman Jewish studies 1957 Yohanan Levi humanities 1957 Yaakov
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Exchange: the Jews of Königsberg, 1700-1820
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 1-1-2010 Culture and Exchange: The ewJ s of Königsberg, 1700-1820 Jill Storm Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Storm, Jill, "Culture and Exchange: The eJ ws of Königsberg, 1700-1820" (2010). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 335. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/335 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of History Dissertation Examination Committee: Hillel Kieval, Chair Matthew Erlin Martin Jacobs Christine Johnson Corinna Treitel CULTURE AND EXCHANGE: THE JEWS OF KÖNIGSBERG, 1700-1820 by Jill Anita Storm A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 Saint Louis, Missouri Contents Acknowledgments ii Introduction 1 Part One: Politics and Economics 1 The Founding of the Community 18 2 “A Watchful Eye”: Synagogue Surveillance 45 3 “Corner Synagogues” and State Control 81 4 Jewish Commercial Life 115 5 Cross-Cultural Exchange 145 Part Two: Culture 6 “A Learned Siberia”: Königsberg’s Place in Historiography 186 7 Ha-Measef and the Königsberg Haskalah 209 8 Maskil vs. Rabbi: Jewish Education and Communal Conflict 232 9 The Edict of 1812 272 Conclusion 293 Bibliography 302 Acknowledgments Many people and organizations have supported me during this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Folk Literature
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Near Eastern Languages and Departmental Papers (NELC) Civilizations (NELC) 1999 Jewish Folk Literature Dan Ben-Amos University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers Part of the Cultural History Commons, Folklore Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ben-Amos, D. (1999). Jewish Folk Literature. Oral Tradition, 14 (1), 140-274. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers/93 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers/93 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jewish Folk Literature Abstract Four interrelated qualities distinguish Jewish folk literature: (a) historical depth, (b) continuous interdependence between orality and literacy, (c) national dispersion, and (d) linguistic diversity. In spite of these diverging factors, the folklore of most Jewish communities clearly shares a number of features. The Jews, as a people, maintain a collective memory that extends well into the second millennium BCE. Although literacy undoubtedly figured in the preservation of the Jewish cultural heritage to a great extent, at each period it was complemented by orality. The reciprocal relations between the two thus enlarged the thematic, formal, and social bases of Jewish folklore. The dispersion of the Jews among the nations through forced exiles and natural migrations further expanded
    [Show full text]
  • Wij-Articles-Maghrebi Women by Moshe Ovadia-Final
    Maghrebi Jewish Women During the British Mandate (1918-1948) in Pre-State Israel Maghrebi Jewish Women During the British Mandate (1918-1948) in Pre-State Israel Moshe Ovadia, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel Abstract The article examines the socioeconomic status of Maghrebi (North African) Jewish women in the four holy cities during the British Mandate. Apart from the historiographical research of Michal Ben Ya'akov, who studied the life of these women during the Nineteenth Century, no comprehensive study was conducted. This article sheds light on the socioeconomic circumstances of the Maghrebi Jewish women during the first half of the Twentieth Century when Maghrebi women witnessed the profound growth and advancement in Eretz Yisrael – the transition from the old Yishuv to the new Yishuv. Introduction In recent years, great progress has been made in historiographical research into the subject of Jewish women in traditional and secular society. Particular importance has been attributed to the historiographical research concerning women since they were not generally the focus of any scientific debate. At the present time, when scholars add the narrative of Jewish women to the historiographical findings, new insights are being discovered regarding their world and their socioeconomic role.1 Yael Atzmon writes about the exclusion of women from Jewish historiography. She states that the omission of women’s contributions is more prominent in Jewish historiography than in general historiography, since the exclusion of women as part of Jewish history bears some resemblance to the problem of the history of the Jews as part of general history.2 Indeed, the exclusion of women from public life in the Jewish community stems from the traditional Jewish way of life, in which a woman's role was confined to the home and family while observing rules of modesty, such as non- revealing apparel and head covering.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Studies Program
    Association for Jewish Studies c/o Center for Jewish History 15 West 16th Street New York, NY 10011-6301 Phone: (917) 606-8249 Fax: (917) 606-8222 E-mail: [email protected] www.ajsnet.org President AJS Staff Jonathan D. Sarna Rona Sheramy Brandeis University Executive Director Vice President / Membership Ilana Abramovitch and Outreach Conference Program Associate Carol Bakhos Laura Greene UCLA Conference Manager Vice President / Program Karin Kugel Pamela S. Nadell Program Book Designer; Website Manager; American University Managing Editor, AJS Perspectives Vice President / Publications Shira Moskovitz Leslie Morris Program and Membership Coordinator; University of Minnesota Manager, Distinguished Lectureship Program Secretary / Treasurer Amy Weiss Zachary Baker Grants and Communications Coordinator Stanford University Cover Designer Ellen Nygaard The Association for Jewish Studies is a constituent society of the American Council of Learned Societies. The Association for Jewish Studies wishes to thank the Center for Jewish History and its constituent organizations—the American Jewish Historical Society, the American Sephardi Federation, the Leo Baeck Institute, Yeshiva University Museum, and the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research—for providing AJS with office space at the Center for Jewish History. Cover credit: The Yiddish theater poster for “The Reverend’s Lady” at the Opera House in Lawrence, Massachusetts, April 18, 1918; Theater and Film Poster Collection of Abram Kanof; P-978; drawer 2C/folder number 30; item number 1967.001.044; American Jewish Historical Society, Boston, MA and New York, NY. Copyright © 2015 No portion of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the express written permission of the Association for Jewish Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbinic Legal Loopholes: Formalism, Equity and Subjectivity
    Rabbinic Legal Loopholes: Formalism, Equity and Subjectivity Elana Stein Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Elana Stein All rights reserved ABSTRACT Rabbinic Legal Loopholes: Formalism, Equity and Subjectivity Elana Stein Rabbinic law is particularly well known for its use of legal dodges and technical circumventions. This dissertation focuses on three main questions about such loopholes: 1) Why is rabbinic law so replete with them? 2) Are they always permitted, and if not, what are the parameters of their use? 3) What does the use of legal loopholes reveal about rabbinic views of the relationship between intention and action? We attempt to answer these questions by analyzing a particular subset of rabbinic legal loopholes known as ha‘arama (cunning). Tracing the history and use of ha‘arama from tannaitic to amoraic sources, this work places rabbinic legal loopholes in context of Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern worldviews, Greco-Roman perspectives, and later contemporaneous Zoroastrian approaches. Working with both tannaitic and amoraic materials, with Palestinian and Babylonian sources, we observe a progression within rabbinic thinking on this front: from rigid legal formalism to a concern for the inner spirit of the law, and from emphasis on the inner spirit of the law to an interest in the inner spirit of the individual legal agent. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Three Sayings of Rav As a Diasporan Manifesto 101–121 When the Jews
    Volume 24 Meir Ben Shahar No. 2 “A Future and a Hope” in Babylonia: Three Sayings 2017 of Rav as a Diasporan Manifesto 101–121 Simcha Gross When the Jews Greeted Ali: Sherira Gaon’s Epistle in Light of Arabic and Syriac Historiography 122–144 Shalom Sadik When Maimonideans and Kabbalists Convert to Christianity 145–167 Abraham Rubin Jewish Self-Affirmation out of the Sources of Christian Supersessionism: Margarete Susman’s The Book of Job and the Fate of the Jewish People 168–193 Mohr Siebeck Meir Ben Shahar Shaʾanan College, Israel “A Future and a Hope” in Babylonia: Three Sayings of Rav as a Diasporan Manifesto* Abstract: The Jewish Diaspora is often viewed as the paradigm of exile, which implies longing for a place from which a people has been forcibly expelled. This article interprets three sayings by Rav in the Babylonian Talmud as reflecting an alternative ideology, in which living outside the Holy Land is not seen as regret- table or shameful, for God is revealed through the Jewish people’s observance of the Torah and the commandments everywhere. Although the relevant sugya in BT Ta’anit 29a–b opens with catastrophe – the destruction of the Temple – Rav’s three sayings here exude optimism, implying that a good life is attainable wherever Jews reside. Every moment of Torah study is the realization of the “future and hope” prom- ised by the prophet Jeremiah. Key words: Land of Israel, Babylonia, Diaspora, Exile, Rav. Introduction The prophet Jeremiah advised the Babylonian exiles: “Build houses and live in them, plant gardens and eat their fruit … And seek the welfare of the city to which I have exiled you, and pray to the Lord in its behalf; for in its prosperity you shall prosper” (Jer 29:5–7).
    [Show full text]
  • Vayera Artscroll P.78 | Haftarah P.1134 Hertz P.63 | Haftarah P.76 Soncino P.86 | Haftarah P.113
    16 November 2019 18 Cheshvan 5780 Shabbat ends London 5.01pm Jerusalem 5.18pm Volume 32 No. 8 Vayera Artscroll p.78 | Haftarah p.1134 Hertz p.63 | Haftarah p.76 Soncino p.86 | Haftarah p.113 The AJEX Remembrance Ceremony & Parade at the Cenotaph takes place from 1pm on Sunday 17 November In loving memory of Shmuel Nissim ben Yaacov “And Avraham raised his eyes and saw – behold, a ram! – afterwards, caught in the thicket by its horns” (Bereishit 22:13). 1 Sidrah Summary: Vayera 1st Aliya (Kohen) – Bereishit 18:1-14 Point to Consider : Which of Lot’s two daughters Shortly after Avraham’s brit milah , God appears is considered in a more negative light? (see Rashi to him in Elonei Mamre. Avraham greets three to 19:37) ‘men’ (in fact, angels – see Rashi) and serves them a fine meal. One of them tells Avraham that 5th Aliya (Chamishi) – 21:5-21 Sarah will have a baby boy in a year’s time. Sarah Sarah sees the negative effect that Avraham’s overhears and laughs in disbelief. wayward first son, Yishmael, could have on Yitzchak. She tells Avraham to send away Yishmael and his mother Hagar. They travel in the 2nd Aliya (Levi) –18:15-33 desert and Yishmael nearly dies of thirst. An God reveals to Avraham His plan to destroy the angel appears, telling Hagar that a great nation wicked city of Sedom. Avraham pleads with God will come from Yishmael. God opens Hagar’s to spare the city, in the merit of any righteous eyes and she sees a well of water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philistines: Bitter Enemy of Israel
    THE PHILISTINES: BITTER ENEMY OF ISRAEL SIMON NOVAK From the era of the Judges to that of the Assyrian empire, the Philistines were the arch enemy of Israel. During the reign of Ahaz (740 BCE), the Phil- istines seized control of Beth-shemesh and the Aijalon district (II Chron. 28:18). Even though both King David (1040 BCE) and King Hezekiah (725 BCE) had subjugated the Philistines, they were still a threat to the Judean kingdom even at the time of the prophet Ezekiel (585 BCE) some 140 years later. Ezekiel writes: Thus said the Lord God: Because the Philistines have dealt by revenge, and have taken vengeance with disdain of soul to destroy, for the old hatred; therefore thus said the Lord God: Behold, I will stretch out My hand upon the Philistines, and I will cut off the Cherethites, and destroy the remnant of the sea-coast. And I will execute great vengeance upon them with furious re- bukes; and they shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall lay My venge- ance upon them (Ezek. 25:15-17). WHO WERE THE PHILISTINES? The Bible identifies Abimelech as king of the Philistines in the days of Abraham and Isaac (Gen. 20:32; 26:8). This has aroused controversy, since extra-biblical sources indicate that the Philistines were a "Sea People" from the region of Crete who invaded the Levant toward the end of the Late Bronze/Iron I Ages, a time generally identified with the Exodus and conquest 1 of Canaan. Also, while there is some tension with Abimelech over water rights (Genesis 26) and wife/sister deception (Genesis 20 and 26), these mat- ters are all resolved, and there is no hint of the enmity that would characterize 2 later Israelite-Philistine relations.
    [Show full text]