Origins of the Torah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Origins of the Torah Origins of the Torah Scrolls from the Torah that Predated Moses Our teacher Moses wrote this book of Genesis together with the entire Torah as dictated by the holy One, blessed is He. It would have been appropriate for him to write at the beginning of the book of Genesis, “The Lord spoke to Moses all these words, saying.” The reason it was written anonymously [i.e., with no such introductory phrase] is that our teacher Moses did not write the Torah in the first person . whereas our teacher Moses wrote the history of all previous generations and his own genealogy, history, and experiences in the third person. Moses therefore is not mentioned in the Torah until his birth, and even then he is mentioned as if someone else were speaking of him. Thus Moses was like a scribe transcribing an ancient book. —Nachmanides, Introduction to Genesis Nachmanides’s words typify the mainstream rabbinical opinion regarding the composition of the Torah in general, and of Genesis in particular. Yet throughout the generations there were some who argued that the Torah had been given “in scrolls,” each at the time most appropriate for its content to be revealed. The stories of Genesis, according to this opinion, were also given at their appropriate time, namely, that of the Patriarchs.1 Moses then was not merely “like a scribe transcribing an ancient book,” but literally used a preexisting text when writing the Torah.2 1 Rabbi Yoḥanan said in the name of Rabbi Banna’ah: The Torah was given in scrolls, as it says, “Then I said, ‘Behold I have come, I am written about in the scroll of the book’” (Ps. 40:8). Rabbi Shimon b. Lakish says: The Torah was given as a sealed whole, as it says, “Take this book of teaching” (Deut. 31:26). Babylonian Talmud, tractate Gittin 60a. 8 Wisdom and Knowledge Will be Given to You 2 “Then I said, ‘See I will bring a scroll recounting what befell me’” (Ps. 40:8)— [King David says:] Since the time the Torah was given, I have appeared in it. [In the verse regarding Lot’s daughters who are saved from the destruc- tion of Sodom it says,] “And your two daughters who are to be found” (Gen. 19:15). [They are saved] in the merit of David, who will descend from Ruth the Moabite and Naamah the Ammonite, mother of Rehoboam. Here is writ- ten, “who are to be found” (ha-nimtza’ot), and there is written, “I have found (matza’ti) David my servant” (Ps. 89:21). It therefore is called a “scroll”: because first the scroll of Creation was written, then the scroll of Noah, then the scroll of Abraham, and thus David says, “I am written about” in the scroll of Abraham.3 Rashi, commentary to Babylonian Talmud, tractate Gittin 60a.4 3 Understand that if we posit that the Patriarchs were considered to belong to the sons of Noah, it may be said that the giving of the Torah began with Abraham, but Abraham was given [the commandment of] circumcision alone; to Jacob was added [the prohibition against eating the] sciatic nerve; in Egypt, the paschal sacrifice; at Marah, other commandments, and at Sinai the rest of the laws. It may be said that this understanding hinges on the debate between Rabbi Yoḥanan and Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish in the Babylonian Talmud, trac- tate Gittin (60a) concerning whether the Torah was given whole or in scrolls. According to the view of Rabbi Yoḥanan, it may be said that the giving of the Torah began with Abraham. Rabbi Joseph b. Judah Engel, Sefer Beit ha-Otzar (Petrokov, 1902), 1:3.5 4 “That same day Pharaoh charged the taskmasters and foremen of the people, saying . ‘Let heavier work be laid upon the men; let them keep at (it and not pay attention to deceitful promises)’” (Exod. 5:6,9)—This serves to teach us that they [i.e., the enslaved Israelites] possessed scrolls, in which they delighted each Sabbath, assuring them that God would redeem them because they rested on the Sabbath. Thus Pharaoh said to them, “Let heavier work be laid,” and let them have neither delight nor rest on the Sabbath day. Shemot Rabbah 5:18.6 Origins of the Torah 9 5 “Then Moses returned to the Lord and said, ‘O Lord, why did You bring harm upon this people?’ (Exod. 5:22)—What is the meaning of the expression “O Lord, why did You bring harm”? Usually, if a person says to his friend, “Why did you do this?” he immediately becomes angry at him. Would Moses say to God, “Why have You brought harm [upon this people]”? Rather, this is what he said: I took the book of Genesis and read it and saw the deeds of the generation of the Deluge and how they were punished, and it was just; and the actions of the generation of the Dispersion, and the Sodomites, and how they were punished, and it was just. Yet this people—what has it done to deserve to be enslaved more than all previous generations? Shemot Rabbah 5:22. 6 “I took the book of Genesis” (Shemot Rabbah 5:22)—The implication is that the book of Genesis was already completely written . for he is of the view that the Torah was given in scrolls, and at the time of the giving of Torah, the entire book of Genesis [and the book of Exodus] until the matter of the giving of the Torah was already written. Rabbi Ze’ev Wolf Einhorn,7 commentary to Shemot Rabbah 5:22 (Vilna: Romm, 1844), 33.8 7 The Lord said to Moses, “Write this memorial in the book of the ancient elders, and put these words for Joshua to hear: that I will surely blot out the memory of Amalek from under the heavens.” Targum Pseudo-Jonathan to Exodus 18:14. 8 These are the prophets and sages who prophesied and received the Torah and transmitted it to one another. These are the prophets who prophesied to the world before the giving of the Torah: Adam, Noah, Shem, Ham, Japheth, and Eber, until Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob came. In the times of our teacher Moses, there were written texts in which the Patriarchs, beginning with Adam, had recorded the chronicles from the beginning of time. Adam transmitted it to Seth, Seth to Methuselah, Methuselah to Noah, Noah to Shem, Shem to Eber, Eber to Isaac, Isaac to Jacob, Jacob to Joseph and his brothers. They 10 Wisdom and Knowledge Will be Given to You told it to their children, and their children to their children, and those children to the next generation, because although our forebears were in Egypt, they always maintained a house of study, as we find in the aggadah, and this is the meaning of “Go and assemble the elders of Israel” (Exod. 3:16). When our teacher Moses was at the point of writing the commandments, he thought it appropriate to write how Israel had received the Torah. Because he was already explaining what transpired in his time, he wrote the story that had brought them down to Egypt and the history of the Patriarchs from the beginning, looking in the books and writing based on them from the days of Creation. He did what he did with divine inspiration, “revealing to His people His powerful works” (Ps. 111:6). Yet although he wrote what he wrote, he did not write everything in entirety, but left most of the Torah as an oral tradition. Rabbi Yerah. mi’el b. Solomon,9 “Seder Olam Nusaḥ Sheni,” in Sefer ha-Zikhro- not: Hu Divrei ha-Yamim li-Yeraḥmi’el (Memorial book: The Chronicles of Yeraḥmi’el), ed. Eli Yassif (Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, 2001), 368–369. 9 The midrash, in my view, makes an important statement in saying that they had scrolls in their possession, for it permits us to agree with the opinion that, prior to Moses, there were books or scrolls that told the stories of the earliest ances- tors and the stories of the Torah were collected from them, just as passages are quoted from the Book of the Wars of the Lord and from the words of the bards. Rabbi Elia Benamozegh, Sefer Torat Hashem . ve-Nosaf alav Em la-Mikra . va . Em la-Masoret10 (Livorno: Defus Benamozegh, 1863), 5:151b–152a (Notes and Omissions to Exod. 4:10).11 10 The scrolls recounting events that preceded the giving of the Torah were writ- ten for Israel before, as noted in Shemot Rabbah (5:18, 5:22). We thus see that the book of Genesis appears to have been written earlier, each story in its generation, and for this reason the midrash refers to it as “scrolls”: because each one wrote a scroll in his generation. And thus it went, in order, the story of Joseph, the story of Jacob’s descent to Egypt, the story of Moses until the giving of the Torah. At the time of the giving of the Torah, God selected which scrolls to tell Moses to write in the written Torah, which to retain as oral law, and perhaps which to conceal due to their falsehoods, while those that were true endured as part of the Written and Oral Law. Origins of the Torah 11 Since the scrolls were written in their time, there is no reason to wonder about the formulation of “who are coming” (ha-ba’im), in the present tense, as opposed to “who came” (asher ba’u), in the past tense, because it truly was written then, at that time, in the present tense.
Recommended publications
  • Should Bakeries Which Are Open on Shabbat Be Supervised? a Response to the Rabinowitz-Weisberg Opinion RABBI HOWARD HANDLER
    Should Bakeries Which are Open on Shabbat Be Supervised? A Response to the Rabinowitz-Weisberg Opinion RABBI HOWARD HANDLER This paper was submitted as a response to the responsum written by Rabbi Mayer Rabinowitz and Ms. Dvora Weisberg entitled "Rabbinic Supervision of Jewish Owned Businesses Operating on Shabbat" which was adopted by the CJLS on February 26, 1986. Should rabbis offer rabbinic supervision to bakeries which are open on Shabbat? i1 ~, '(l) l'\ (1) The food itself is indeed kosher after Shabbat, once the time required to prepare it has elapsed. 1 The halakhah is according to Rabbi Yehudah and not according to the Mishnah which is Rabbi Meir's opinion. (2) While a Jew who does not observe all the mitzvot is in some instances deemed trustworthy, this is never the case regarding someone who flagrantly disregards the laws of Shabbat, especially for personal profit. Maimonides specifically excludes such a person's trustworthiness regarding his own actions.2 Moreover in the case of n:nv 77n~ (a violator of Shabbat) Maimonides explicitly rejects his trustworthiness. 3 No support can be brought from Moshe Feinstein who concludes, "even if the proprietor closes his store on Shabbat, [since it is known to all that he does not observe Shabbat], we assume he only wants to impress other observant Jews so they will buy from him."4 Previously in the same responsum R. Feinstein emphasizes that even if the person in The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halakhah for the Conservative movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 'Like Iron to a Magnet': Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence David Sclar Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/380 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence By David Sclar A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 David Sclar All Rights Reserved This Manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Prof. Jane S. Gerber _______________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt _______________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Francesca Bregoli _______________________________________ Prof. Elisheva Carlebach ________________________________________ Prof. Robert Seltzer ________________________________________ Prof. David Sorkin ________________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii Abstract “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence by David Sclar Advisor: Prof. Jane S. Gerber This dissertation is a biographical study of Moses Hayim Luzzatto (1707–1746 or 1747). It presents the social and religious context in which Luzzatto was variously celebrated as the leader of a kabbalistic-messianic confraternity in Padua, condemned as a deviant threat by rabbis in Venice and central and eastern Europe, and accepted by the Portuguese Jewish community after relocating to Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London
    09/29/21 HEBR7411: Modern approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London HEBR7411: Modern approaches to the View Online Talmud: Sacha Stern Albeck, Chanoch, Mavo La-Talmudim (Tel-Aviv: Devir, 1969) Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks, Transmitting Mishnah: The Shaping Influence of Oral Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006) Amit, Aaron, Makom She-Nahagu: Pesahim Perek 4 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2009), Talmud ha-igud Ba’adani, Netanel, Hayu Bodkin: Sanhedrin Perek 5 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2012), Talmud ha-igud Bar-Asher Siegal, Michal, Early Christian Monastic Literature and the Babylonian Talmud (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013) Benovitz, Moshe, Lulav va-Aravah ve-Hahalil: Sukkah Perek 4-5 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2013), Talmud ha-igud ———, Me-Ematai Korin et Shema: Berakhot Perek 1 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2006), Talmud ha-igud Brody, Robert, Mishnah and Tosefta Studies, First edition, July 2014 (Jerusalem: The Hebrew university, Magnes press, 2014) ———, The Geonim of Babylonia and the Shaping of Medieval Jewish Culture, Paperback ed., with a new preface and an updated bibliography (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013) Carmy, Shalom, Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah: Contributions and Limitations (Northvale, N.J.: J. Aronson, 1996), The Orthodox Forum series Chernick, Michael L., Essential Papers on the Talmud (New York: New York University Press, 1994), Essential papers on Jewish studies Daṿid Halivni, Meḳorot U-Masorot (Nashim), ha-Mahadurah ha-sheniyah (Ṭoronṭo, Ḳanadah: Hotsaʼat Otsarenu) ———, Meḳorot U-Masorot: Seder Moʼed (Yerushalayim: Bet ha-Midrash le-Rabanim be-Ameriḳah be-siṿuʻa Keren Moshe (Gusṭaṿ) Ṿortsṿayler, 735) ‘dTorah.com’ <http://dtorah.com/> 1/5 09/29/21 HEBR7411: Modern approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London Epstein, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanhedrin 053.Pub
    ט"ז אלול תשעז“ Thursday, Sep 7 2017 ן נ“ג סנהדרי OVERVIEW of the Daf Distinctive INSIGHT to apply stoning to other cases גזירה שוה Strangulation for adultery (cont.) The source of the (1 ואלא מכה אביו ואמו קא קשיא ליה, למיתי ולמיגמר מאוב וידעוני R’ Yoshiya’s opinion in the Beraisa is unsuccessfully וכו ‘ ליגמרו מאשת איש, דאי אתה רשאי למושכה להחמיר עליה וכו‘ .challenged at the bottom of 53b lists אלו הן הנסקלין Stoning T he Mishnah of (2 The Mishnah later derives other cases of stoning from a many cases which are punished with stoning. R’ Zeira notes gezeirah shavah from Ov and Yidoni. R’ Zeira questions that the Torah only specifies stoning explicitly in a handful גזירה שוה of cases, while the other cases are learned using a דמיהם בם or the words מות יומתו whether it is the words Rashi states that the cases where we find . אוב וידעוני that are used to make that gezeirah shavah. from -stoning explicitly are idolatry, adultery of a betrothed maid . דמיהם בם Abaye answers that it is from the words Abaye’s explanation is defended. en, violating the Shabbos, sorcery and cursing the name of R’ Acha of Difti questions what would have bothered R’ God. Aruch LaNer points out that there are three addition- Zeira had the gezeirah shavah been made from the words al cases where we find stoning mentioned outright (i.e., sub- ,mitting one’s children to Molech, inciting others to idolatry . מות יומתו In any case, there .( בן סורר ומורה—After R’ Acha of Difti suggests and rejects a number of and an recalcitrant son גזירה possible explanations Ravina explains what was troubling R’ are several cases of stoning which are derived from the R’ Zeira asks Abaye to identify the source from which .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Kings 10) Notes: Week Eight
    Lessons from Solomon: Celebrating God’s Provision (1 Kings 10) Notes: Week Eight 1 Kings 10 (HCSB) The Queen of Sheba 10 The queen of Sheba heard about Solomon’s fame connected with the name of Yahweh and came to test him with difficult questions. 2 She came to Jerusalem with a very large entourage, with camels bearing spices, gold in great abundance, and precious stones. She came to Solomon and spoke to him about everything that was on her mind. 3 So Solomon answered all her questions; nothing was too difficult for the king to explain to her. 4 When the queen of Sheba observed all of Solomon’s wisdom, the palace he had built, 5 the food at his table, his servants’ residence, his attendants’ service and their attire, his cupbearers, and the burnt offerings he offered at the LORD’s temple, it took her breath away. 6 She said to the king, “The report I heard in my own country about your words and about your wisdom is true. 7 But I didn’t believe the reports until I came and saw with my own eyes. Indeed, I was not even told half. Your wisdom and prosperity far exceed the report I heard. 8 How happy are your men.[a] How happy are these servants of yours, who always stand in your presence hearing your wisdom. 9 May Yahweh your God be praised! He delighted in you and put you on the throne of Israel, because of the LORD’s eternal love for Israel. He has made you king to carry out justice and righteousness.” 10 Then she gave the king four and a half tons[b] of gold, a great quantity of spices, and precious stones.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 CHRONICLES ‐ Chapter Outlines 1
    2 CHRONICLES ‐ Chapter Outlines 1 9. Solomon and the Queen of Sheba 2 CHRONICLES [1] 10‐12. Rehoboam Over 2 Southern Tribes 2nd Chronicles is the Book of David’s Heritage. The narrative from 1st Chronicles continues 13. Jeroboam Over 10 Northern Tribes with the reign of Solomon, and the Kings of 14‐16. Good King Asa Judah down through Zedekiah and the 17‐20. Good King Jehoshaphat Babylonian Captivity. (note unholy alliance with Ahab) TITLE 21. Jehoram’s Reign [J] 1st & 2nd Chronicles (like Samuel & Kings) were 22. Only One Heir Left in the Royal Line of originally one Book. The Hebrew title Dibrey Christ, Joash Hayyamiym means “words (accounts) of the 23‐24. Reign of Joash [J] days.” The Greek (Septuagint) title, 25. Reign of Amaziah [J] Paraleipomenon, means “of things omitted.” This is rather misnamed, as Chronicles does 26. Reign of Uzziah [J] much more than provide omitted material as a 27. Reign of Jothan [J] supplement to Samuel & Kings. 28. Reign of Ahaz [J] The English title comes from Jerome’s Latin 29‐32. Reign of Hezekiah [J] Vulgate, which titled this Book Chronicorum 33. Reign of Manasseh (55) [J] Liber. 34‐35. Reign of Josiah [J] AUTHOR 36. The Babylonian Captivity The traditional author of Chronicles is Ezra the CHAPTER OUTLINES priest/scribe. The conclusion to 2nd Chronicles (36:22,23) is virtually identical with the 2 CHRONICLES 1 introduction to Ezra (1:1 3). Others choose to 1. Solomon began his reign with an act of leave the author anonymous, and call him the worship at the Tabernacle (2nd Chr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Kings 11:14-40 “Solomon's Adversaries”
    1 Kings 11:14-40 “Solomon’s Adversaries” 1 Kings 11:9–10 9 So the LORD became angry with Solomon, because his heart had turned from the LORD God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice, 10 and had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods; but he did not keep what the LORD had commanded. Where were the Prophets David had? • To warn Solomon of his descent into paganism. • To warn Solomon of how he was breaking the heart of the Lord. o Do you have friends that care enough about you to tell you when you are backsliding against the Lord? o No one in the Electronic church to challenge you, to pray for you, to care for you. All of these pagan women he married (for political reasons?) were of no benefit. • Nations surrounding Israel still hated Solomon • Atheism, Agnostics, Gnostics, Paganism, and Legalisms are never satisfied until you are dead – and then it turns to kill your children and grandchildren. Exodus 20:4–6 4 “You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; 5 you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, 6 but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.
    [Show full text]
  • HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS in the SOLOMON NARRATIVE of 1 KINGS 1–11 John A
    HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS IN THE SOLOMON NARRATIVE OF 1 KINGS 1–11 John A. Davies Summary The narrative in 1 Kings 1–11 makes use of the literary device of sevenfold lists of items and sevenfold recurrences of Hebrew words and phrases. These heptadic patterns may contribute to the cohesion and sense of completeness of both the constituent pericopes and the narrative as a whole, enhancing the readerly experience. They may also serve to reinforce the creational symbolism of the Solomon narrative and in particular that of the description of the temple and its dedication. 1. Introduction One of the features of Hebrew narrative that deserves closer attention is the use (consciously or subconsciously) of numeric patterning at various levels. In narratives, there is, for example, frequently a threefold sequence, the so-called ‘Rule of Three’1 (Samuel’s three divine calls: 1 Samuel 3:8; three pourings of water into Elijah’s altar trench: 1 Kings 18:34; three successive companies of troops sent to Elijah: 2 Kings 1:13), or tens (ten divine speech acts in Genesis 1; ten generations from Adam to Noah, and from Noah to Abram; ten toledot [‘family accounts’] in Genesis). One of the numbers long recognised as holding a particular fascination for the biblical writers (and in this they were not alone in the ancient world) is the number seven. Seven 1 Vladimir Propp, Morphology of the Folktale (rev. edn; Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968; tr. from Russian, 1928): 74; Christopher Booker, The Seven Basic Plots of Literature: Why We Tell Stories (London: Continuum, 2004): 229-35; Richard D.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications
    COMMUNICATIONS DIVINE JUSTICE tov 10. Why cannot Rabbi Granatstein To THE EDITOR OF TRADITION: accept the traditional explanation of Jonah's conduct namely: Jonah In Rabbi Granatstein's recent knew that Nineveh was likely to article "Theodicy and Belief (TRA- repent in contrast with the conduct DITION, Winter 1973), he sug- of Israel who had had ample warn- gests that Jonah's motivation in ings of doom without responding trying to escape his mission to to them. The fate of Israel would Nineveh was that he could not ac- be negatively affected by an action cept "the unjustifiable selectivity of Jonah. Rather than become the involved in Divine "descent"; that willng instrument of his own peo- God's desire to save Nineveh is ple's destruction, Jonah preferred "capricious and violates the univer- self-destruction to destruction of sal justice in which Jonah be- his people. In a conflct between lieves." These are strong words loyalty to his people and loyalty which are not supported by quo- to God Jonah chose the former _ tations -from traditional sources. to his discredit, of course. In this Any student of Exodus 33: 13 is vein, Jonah's actions are explained familar with Moses's quest for un- by Redak, Malbin, Abarbarnel derstanding the ways of Divine based on M ekhilta in Parshat Bo. Providence and is also familar Why must we depart from this in- with the answer in 33: 19, "And I terpretation? shall be gracious to whom I shall Elias Munk show mercy." The selectivity of Downsview, Ontario God's providence has thus been well established ever since the days of the golden calf and it would RABBi GRANA TSTEIN REPLIES: seem unlikely that God had cho- sen a prophet who was not perfect- I cannot agree with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Meer Der Halacha: Der Talmud Ist Wie Das Große Meer Shirr 5,20
    Das Meer der Halacha: Der Talmud ist wie das große Meer ShirR 5,20 1 Traktat Avot, Kapitel 1 מסכת אבות פרק א 1,1 א (א) Mose empfing Tora vom Sinai משה קבל תורה מסיני, und übergab sie Josua ומסרה ליהושע, (שמות יח, במדבר יא) und Josua den Ältesten ויהושע לזקנים, und Älteste Propheten וזקנים לנביאים, .und Propheten übergaben sie den Leuten der Großen Versammlung ונביאים מסרוה לאנשי כנסת הגדולה. :Die sagte drei Dinge הם אמרו שלשה דברים, (Seid geduldig/abwartend/moderat/gemäßigt im Gericht(sprozeß (1) הוו מתונים בדין, und stellt viele Schüler auf (2) והעמידו תלמידים הרבה, .und macht einen Zaun für die Tora (3) ועשו סיג לתורה: 1,2 א (ב) Simëon der Gerechte שמעון הצדיק .war von den Übrigen der großen Versammlung היה משירי כנסת הגדולה. :Er pflegte zu sagen הוא היה אומר, :Auf drei Dingen steht die Welt על שלשה דברים העולם עומד, auf der Tora (1) על התורה und auf dem Dienst/der Liturgie (2) ועל העבודה .und auf frommer Wohltat (3) ועל גמילות חסדים: 2 Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 5, col. 635f Literaturüberblick auf einem Blatt 3 1 Überblick über die Traditionsliteratur Überblick über die Traditionsliteratur 1. Bibel 2. Mischna, Tosefta und Baraita 3. Gemara a) des Westens, Babyloniens, der Exilsgemeinde b) des Ostens, Jerusalems, des Landes Israel 4. Midrasch 5. Responsen 6. Liturgie-Bücher: Siddur und Machsor 7. Halacha-Kompendien: a) Talmudparaphrase (Rif, Rabbi Isaak al-Fasi, 1013–1103) b) Mizwot-Sammlungen (SeMaG, SeMaK – Sefer Mitzwot Gadol/Katan) c) Mischne Tora (Maimonides, RaMBaM, Rabbi Mose Ben Maimon, 1135–1204) d) Tur (Baal ha-Turim, Jakob ben Ascher, 1270–1340) e) Bet Josef, Schulchan Aruch (Josef Karo, 1488–1575) f) Mappa (RaMa/ReMa/ReMo/ReMu, Rabbi Mose ben Israel/Mose Isserles, 1525–1572) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Wage Theft and Consumer Boycotts -למען נחדל מעשק ידינו
    Wage Theft and Consumer Boycotts -למען נחדל מעשק ידינו Morris Panitz, Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies Introduction: The Consumer Boycott as a Resistance Strategy Consumer boycotts are a resistance strategy that draws heavily on the foundational principles of civil disobedience.1 An individual engaged in an act of civil disobedience “seeks not only to convey her disavowal and condemnation of a certain law or policy, but also to draw public attention to this particular issue and thereby to instigate a change in law or policy.”2 The public sphere serves as the ideal forum for civil disobedience for two reasons. First, the target of the direct action is forced to confront the issue under the scrutiny of the public eye, thereby raising the stakes for how the issue is dealt with. Ideally, the public will hold the target accountable for its response to the act of civil disobedience. Second, the calculation on the part of the target of whether or not to meet the demands of the protestors is partially determined by the following generated by the act of civil disobedience. Thus, the public sphere helps attract further support to instigate a change in law or policy. Consumer boycott campaigns are “where citizens act collectively and use their purchasing power to achieve economic, social or political objectives….Consumers can use their purchasing power as a kind of vote that is capable, among other things, of educating corporate 1 I am grateful to Rabbis Elliot Dorff and Aryeh Cohen for their thoughtful teaching and editorial remarks that shaped the development of this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Chronology of the Old Testament the Following Chronological List Is Adapted from the Chronological Bible
    Old Testament Overview The Christian Bible is divided into two parts: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The word “testament” can also be translated as “covenant” or “relationship.” The Old Testament describes God’s covenant of law with the people of Israel. The New Testament describes God’s covenant of grace through Jesus Christ. When we accept Jesus as our Savior and Lord, we enter into a new relationship with God. Christians believe that ALL Scripture is “God-breathed.” God’s Word speaks to our lives, revealing God’s nature. The Lord desires to be in relationship with His people. By studying the Bible, we discover how to enter into right relationship with God. We also learn how Christians are called to live in God’s kingdom. The Old Testament is also called the Hebrew Bible. Jewish theologians use the Hebrew word “Tanakh.” The term describes the three divisions of the Old Testament: the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im), and the Writings (Ketuvim). “Tanakh” is composed of the first letters of each section. The Law in Hebrew is “Torah” which literally means “teaching.” In the Greek language, it is known as the Pentateuch. It comprises the first five books of the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. This section contains the stories of Creation, the patriarchs and matriarchs, the exodus from Egypt, and the giving of God’s Law, including the Ten Commandments. The Prophets cover Israel’s history from the time the Jews entered the Promised Land of Israel until the Babylonian captivity of Judah.
    [Show full text]