DOCSLIB.ORG

Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 2019-2024

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 2019-2024 Regional Parks General Government Transportation and Public Works Sonoma Water County of Sonoma and Sonoma Water Capital Improvement Plan Authors and Agencies General Services Department Regional Parks Department Caroline Judy, Director Bert Whitaker, Director Transportation and Sonoma Water Public Works Department Grant Davis, General Manager Johannes J. Hoevertsz, Director Development Team Facilities Planning Toni Holland, Capital Project Manager Committee Members Sandra Gallant, Project Manager Caroline Judy, General Services Director Jared Osborn, Data Systems Analyst Keith Lew, Deputy Director Gloria Clark, Publication Designer Bruce Oveson, Sr. Capital Projects Manager Toni Holland, Capital Project Manager Marc McDonald, Real Estate Manager Katherine DiPasqua, Administrative Analyst III, CAO Jane Elias, Energy and Sustainability Manager Tamra Pinoris, ASO II Eric Herrman, Facilities & Maintenance Manager Department and Agency Liaisons Toni Holland, General Services Monique Chapman, Transportation and Public Works Steve Ehret, Regional Parks Elizabeth Tyree, Regional Parks Kent Gylfe, Sonoma Water 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Page B-1 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . B-3 II. GENERAL GOVERNMENT . B-11 Overview . .B-13 Prioritized Project Description List . B-21 Project Funding Sources . .B-25 Projects Organized by Categories . .B-33 Project Details Organized by Priority . .B-38 III. REGIONAL PARKS . C-1 Overview . C-3 Overview of Funding Sources. C-5 Project Details Organized Alphabetically . C-9 List of Regional Parks & Map . C-118 IV. TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS . D-1 Overview . D-3 Airport Division . D-3 Integrated Waste Division . D-4 Roads Division . D-4 Transit Division . D-6 Project Details Organized by Division . D-7 V. SONOMA WATER . E-1 Overview . E-3 Water Transmission System . E-10 Water Supply . E-11 Flood Control Zones . E-11 Sanitation Districts/Zones . E-12 Administration and General Fund . .E-13 Internal Service . E-13 Funding Source Report . .E-14 Project Details Organized by Division/Fund . E-15 VI. APPENDIX . F-1 I. Overview & Plan Development Process . F-3 II. Project Funding Database Descriptions . .F-7 III. Acronyms . .F-10 IV. Glossary . F-11 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Page B-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Page B-3 Executive Summary the recovery and rebuilding of the community, behalf of the General Services On while improving public safety and access to Department, I am pleased to submit to the Board government services. the draft County of Sonoma Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2019-2020 through 2023-2024. Cross-Agency Collaboration This five-year planning document created by The Sonoma County Code (Section 2, Division the General Services Department, Regional 2-8L) requires the County Administrator to Parks, Transportation and Public Works, and “recommend to the Board of Supervisors a long Sonoma Water includes a Capital Improvement term Capital Improvement Program including Plan from each agency or department, and project priorities, costs, and methods of lays out needed projects with associated costs financing.” Therefore, this Capital Improvement forecasted over a five-year fiscal period. Plan indicates project priorities and estimated funding needs for the Board’s consideration. As an efficiency improvement, the detailed pages Maximizing Impact and Funding describing each project are available on the Each responsible agency or department has SoCo Capital Program website at http://budget. prioritized their projects based on short-term sonomacounty.ca.gov/#!/year/default. needs and long-term objectives, and included potential funding sources such as pending Board Consideration grants and other agreements to offset capital costs. The County of Sonoma Capital Improvement Plan (the Plan) for FY2019-24 represents a cross- Funding sources are suggested for projects agency effort to prioritize county-wide capital where potential funding has been identified. improvements to address recovery related However, Board acceptance of the five-year needs, improve access to government services, Plan does not fund projects. Rather, the Board’s and reduce the cost of government operations. adoption of the annual Capital Projects Budget The Plan provides estimated funding needs during the overall County budget development for the Board of Supervisors to consider in the process provides funding for projects. Final course of subsequent budget discussions. determination of project funding is made in the annual Capital Projects Budget. County Department staff request review and input from the Board regarding the content of Capital projects funded by non-General Fund the Plan and the projects proposed. Review revenue sources and managed by other of the Plan by the Board does not authorize departments or agencies are in separate appropriations or finalize funding decisions. sections of the overall Capital Project Plan, Such decisions will be made by the Board as such as projects for Transportation and Public part of the fiscal year budget, and as project Works, Regional Parks, and Sonoma Water. contracts are brought to the Board for award. For uniformity in approach, and in some cases to maximize value and impact, countywide As a result of the 2017 Sonoma County fires, programs such as access compliance work may the normal capital improvement process was be managed by General Services on behalf of modified to reprioritize projects that advance 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Page B-5 Executive Summary these other agencies. prioritization plays a large role in the funding of General Government projects. General Government Capital Improvement Plan Funding for Capital Projects for FY 2019-20 from the General Fund is projected to be $5.5 million. The Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for FY This funding will be used to progress the highest 2019-24 identifies total needs of over $1 billion priority capital projects. Although the Board for County owned facilities. This represents five will make the final determination in the budget years of General Government capital project process, General Services recommends the needs. Total needs has increased significantly following projects receive top priority for funding from $315 million last year because of the based upon priorities established in Policy 5-2, addition of 41 new projects, the addition of and given recovery and resiliency priorities. the deferred maintenance and demolition (Total project budgets represent entire project programs, plus factoring in the 6% escalation in design and construction costs over multiple construction costs. The new project requests years. Amounts listed below represent total include the new County Government Center, a amount requested for funding in FY 2019-20). new Emergency Operations Center, and a new Public Health Lab and Morgue. Capital projects Generators at Sheriff Building and rely largely on General Fund dollars as well as Central Mechanical Plant $2,484,000 other funding sources such as Criminal Justice Radio Communications County Funds for eligible Criminal Justice projects. Microwave System (Links) $378,000 County Government Center Facility • Projects Completed FY 2018-19: $36,315,419 Planning $550,000 • Projects Active and Approved FY 2018-19: Seismic Retrofitting of Petaluma $77,012,930 Veterans Hall and Emergency • Unfunded Need FY 2019-24: $417,901,000 Generators $2,588,520 Main Adult Detention Facility The use of General Fund dollars is discretionary. Re-roof Phase 4 $1,137,550 This distinguishes the General Government County Accessibility Barrier Plan from other department and agency capital Removal–FY19/20 $1,600,000 project plans that have dedicated uses for funds. Main Adult Detention Facility – Although there are multiple fund sources for Housing Safety-Security–Phase I $850,000 the projects described in the Plan, the available SETP (ADA) Survey of General Fund dollars for General Government Unincorporated Areas-Phase 1 $150,000 capital projects is $3.9 million, plus an additional Permit Sonoma Reconfiguration $1,011,300 $1.6 million allowance for Americans with Replacing Sheriff Power System $100,000 Disabilities Act barrier removal, which means funding is not available for all proposed projects. Replace Sheriff Base Radios $250,000 The allocation of $3.9 million General Fund As in previous years, limited financial resources dollars to projects in the Plan has remained flat mean funding is available for only the highest for the past 12 years, reflecting the County's priority asset preservation and client-program- fiscal situation. Therefore, given the many needs driven improvement projects. Therefore, projects in the Plan and the relatively limited funding, are prioritized to address recovery related 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Page B-6 Executive Summary needs, improve access to services, and ensure projects has stabilized, with a couple of critical smart spending. sources coming on line to offset the elimination of other local, state, and federal sources. Regional Parks Notably, the Park Bond was approved by State Capital Improvement Plan voters in June 2017 and the "Parks for All" Measure M was approved by Sonoma County Regional Parks' Five Year Capital Improvement voters in November 2018. The Proposition Plan for FY 2019-24 includes 108 projects and 1 Water Bond approved by voters in 2014 totals $132.4 million, of which $60.3 million is continues to have funding
Recommended publications
  • Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay

    Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay

    The Final Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program February 2021 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning Therese Trivedi Assistant Director Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | i Table of Contents I. Summary of Conformity Analysis ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Control Measures .................................................................................................... 7 History of Transportation Control Measures .............................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Control Measures................................................................................ 9 III. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Conformity Findings ...................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | ii I. Summary of Conformity Analysis The
  • Why I Hate Microsoft by F.W

    Why I Hate Microsoft by F.W

    Why I hate Microsoft by F.W. van Wensveen Why I hate Microsoft "A personal, lengthy, but highly articulate outburst" by F.W. van Wensveen Table of contents Introduction A brief introduction, or why this paper needed to be written Abstract The management summary 1. From the people who brought you EDLIN Microsoft and innovation 2. The not-so-good, the bad and the ugly The general quality of Microsoft products 3. The power to bind Formats and standards 4. World domination From business to megalomania 5. Bad practice, foul play Exploring the limits of lawful conduct 6. Caveat Emptor Think before you buy 7. Where are you forced to go today? Price gouging and other monopolist practices 8. The road ahead On diminishing returns and continuing trends Appendix A A brief overview of Windows' most serious design flaws Appendix B Links Introduction "One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them..." From the title of this paper you may have guessed that I am not very impressed with the guys in Redmond. One might even say that my dislike for Microsoft is a pet hate gone out of control in an almost quixotic fashion. Why is this? Of course I have been accused of personal antipathy, of being jealous of Bill Gates and his billions, and of being prejudiced against all things Microsoft without any reason whatsoever. None of this is true. I have nothing personal against Bill Gates. Why should I? I don't know the man, I've never met him. I agree with those who say he might be the most successful salesman in history.
  • Gamification: Sneaking Fitness Game Mechanics Into AAA Games

    Gamification: Sneaking Fitness Game Mechanics Into AAA Games

    Andreas Leibetseder Gamification: Sneaking Fitness Game Mechanics into AAA Games Masterarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Ingenieur Studium Masterstudium Informatik ALPEN-ADRIA UNIVERSITAT¨ KLAGENFURT Fakult¨atf¨urTechnische Wissenschaften (TEWI) Begutachter: Assoc. Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Mathias Lux Institut f¨urInformationstechnologie (ITEC) March 2016 Eidesstattliche Erkl¨arung{ Affidavit Ich versichere an Eides statt, dass ich die eingereichte wissenschaftliche Arbeit selbstst¨andigverfasst und andere als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt habe, die w¨ahrenddes Arbeitsvorganges von dritter Seite erfahrene Unterst¨utzung,ein- schließlich signifikanter Betreuungshinweise, vollst¨andig offengelegt habe, die Inhalte, die ich aus Werken Dritter oder eigenen Werken wortw¨ortlich oder sinngem¨aߨubernommen habe, in geeigneter Form gekennzeichnet und den Ur- sprung der Information durch m¨oglichst exakte Quellenangaben (z.B. in Fußnoten) ersichtlich gemacht habe, die Arbeit bisher weder im Inland noch im Ausland einer Pr¨ufungsbeh¨ordevorgelegt habe und zur Plagiatskontrolle eine digitale Version der Arbeit eingereicht habe, die mit der gedruckten Version ¨ubereinstimmt. Ich bin mir bewusst, dass eine tatsachenwidrige Erkl¨arungrechtliche Folgen haben wird. I hereby declare in lieu of an oath that the submitted academic paper is entirely my own work and that no auxiliary materials have been used other than those indicated, I have fully disclosed all assistance received from third parties during the process of writing the paper, including any significant advice from supervisors, any contents taken from the works of third parties or my own works that have been included either literally or in spirit have been appropriately marked and the respective source of the information has been clearly identified with precise bibliographical references (e.g.
  • Roadway Project Listings

    Roadway Project Listings

    Roadway Project Listings Roadway Projects Alameda County State Highway Projects TIP ID: ALA050079 County: Alameda System: State Highway RTP ID: 17-01-0040 CTIPS 20600003665 Sponsor: Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Implementing Agency: Caltrans Project Name: I-80 Gilman Interchange Improvements Description: Berkeley: On Gilman Ave at I-80: Reconfigure interchange providing dual roundabout at the entrance & exits from I-80 as well as the Eastshore Hwy & West Frontage Rd and bike/ped overcrossing. Project also references RTP ID 17-01-0001. Air Quality Exempt Code: 5.04 - EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment Route: 80 Post Mile From: 6.4 Post Mile To: 6.8 Toll Credits: All funding in thousands of dollars Phase Fund Source Prior Years FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 Future Years Total Programmed PE EARMARK $ 1,080 $ 1,080 PE OTHER LOCAL $ 354 $ 354 PE SALESTAX- $ 4,179 $ 4,179 PSE SALESTAX- $ 6,172 $ 6,172 ROW RIP $ 2,445 $ 2,445 ROW SALESTAX- $ 200 $ 200 CON ATP-REG $ 4,152 $ 4,152 CON RIP $ 38,784 $ 38,784 CON SALESTAX- $ 4,358 $ 4,358 Total Programmed Funding: $ 11,985 $ 49,739 $ 61,724 TIP ID: ALA170002 County: Alameda System: State Highway RTP ID: 17-01-0037 CTIPS 20600006072 Sponsor: Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Implementing Agency: Alameda County Transportation Project Name: I-80/Ashby Avenue Interchange Improvements Description: Alameda County: I-80/Ashby IC: Reconstruct the interchange including constructing new bridge, two roundabouts and bike/ped improvements
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN

    0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN

    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
  • AARP Work for Yourself@50+

    AARP Work for Yourself@50+

    With the generous support of The information provided here is for informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. Copyright © 2016 by AARP Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This program would not have been possible without the support of The Hartford. AARP Foundation would like to recognize its members of the program team that brought this project to life: Emily Allen, Jill Friend, Stacey McDaniel, Marc McDonald, Stephanie Okpala, Donna V.S. Ortega, Aiyshen Padilla, Michael Petrick, Jocelyn Silsby and Lori Strauss. We also would like to recognize the many dedicated individuals and organizations whose efforts and expertise are crucial to the success of our program: AARP Connie Evans and the Association for Enterprise Opportunity (AEO) National Association for Community College Entrepreneurship (NACCE) National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders (NALCAB) Karen Murrell and Higher Heights Consulting 1 Table of Contents Introduction . 4 How to Use the Work for Yourself@50+ Materials . 5 We’re Here to Help.................................................................. 6 Step 1: Explore Your Options . 8 What Does “Working for Yourself” Mean? . 8 The Advantages and Challenges of Self‑Employment .............................. 9 WORKSHEET: Self‑Employment Checklist . 9 WORKSHEET: Do You Have the Disposition to Be Self‑Employed? . 10 Forms of Self‑Employment......................................................... 11 WORKSHEET: The Importance of Goals .............................................13 Talking About Money — How Much Do You Need to Make? .......................14 WORKSHEET: Your Self‑Employment Considerations .
  • MTC, Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area

    MTC, Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area

    Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Table of Contents Chapter Page Table Page 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 3.1 Average Bay Area weekday bicycle trips .................................... 14 2. Goals and Policies ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Average Bay Area weekend bicycle trips ..................................... 15 3. Background ......................................................................................... 11 3.3 Average Bay Area total bicycle trips ............................................ 16 • Physical setting ............................................................................... 11 3.4 Bay Area daily journey‐to‐work commuters ............................... 17 • Trip‐making trends ........................................................................ 12 3.5 Bay
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study with Exhibits

    Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study with Exhibits

    MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I INITIAL STUDY Davis Townhomes 6737 Sebastopol Avenue CITY OF SEBASTOPOL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 7120 BODEGA AVENUE SEBASTOPOL, CALIFORNIA 95472 March 7:2019 I. Environmental Checklist Forms - Mitigated Negative Declaration 1. Project Title Davis Townhomes 2. Lead Agency Name and City of Sebastopol — Planning Department, 7120 Bodega Address Avenue, Sebastopol, CA 95472 3. Contact Person and Phone Dana Morrison, Assistant Planner. (707) 823-6167 Number 4. Project Location 6737 Sebastopol Avenue [aka SR12), Sebastopol Ca 95472 (APN 004-063-036) 5. Project Sponsor’s Name Dan Davis — 1051 Todd Road, Santa Rosa Ca 95407 and_Address 6. General Plan Designation Central Core 7. Zoning Downtown Core 8. Description of Project The Project proposes development of eighteen (18); attached, 1,180 square foot, 2-bedroom, 1.5 bathroom, 2- story townhomes on a 1.74 acre lot. The proposed town homes are clustered around a central open space, in three clusters. Lot sizes vary from —1250 to —1800 square feet. The town homes are proposed to have 6-foot-deep front and rear porches (which will have a storage closet). In addition, there will be private rear yards of a minimum 20 feet deep by 20 feet wide with rear gates. Project will include 18 carport spaces along with 18 assigned surface parking spaces and two (2) visitor parking spaces, for a total of 38 parking space. The proposed development also includes gated driveway access to Park Village (to be used in case of emergency), fire and emergency vehicle access, storm water retention areas, and new landscaping including the addition of 56 new trees, trash and recycling enclosure, and one ganged mail box.
  • Bill Gates, "Keynote Address to the Creating Digital Dividends Conference" (18 October 2000)

    Bill Gates, "Keynote Address to the Creating Digital Dividends Conference" (18 October 2000)

    Voices of Democracy 2 (2007): 227‐243 French 227 BILL GATES, "KEYNOTE ADDRESS TO THE CREATING DIGITAL DIVIDENDS CONFERENCE" (18 OCTOBER 2000) Sandra L. French Radford University Abstract: In the first twenty‐five years of Microsoft, Bill Gates established himself and his company as a powerful social force in the advancement of technology. Gates' keynote address to the 2000 Creating Digital Dividends conference, however, surprised attendees and the press by arguing against the establishment of technology in underdeveloped nations in favor of promotion world equity in healthcare. This speech presents a major shift in Gates' persona, and was largely derided as insincere philanthropy. Key Words: digital divide, technology, Bill Gates, health, crisis, computers. The influence of Bill Gates on technology, society, and global economics is undisputed. He co‐founded Microsoft in 1975 with the vision of a "computer on every desk and in every home"—a computer that would, of course, be running Microsoft software. In the first twenty‐five years of Microsoft, their software products have become the primary method for working, obtaining information, and communicating online. Gates' tenure as Microsoft's chief executive has come to symbolize for many the dawn of the information age and the resultant digital capitalism. Images of Gates are filtered to the public through the mass media and the increasing technological literacy of the global world. Technology is a popular subject of study for contemporary rhetoricians, and has been examined at the micro and macro levels. While much has been written about the development of the personal computer and its impact on society, little attention has been given to technology's business leaders.
  • The Great Redwood Trail: a Vision of the Future

    The Great Redwood Trail: a Vision of the Future

    The Great Redwood Trail: A Vision of the Future 2019 California State Trails Conference Willamette River Greenway Oregon Coast Bike Route Caryl Hart: Board Member, North Coast Great Redwood Railroad Authority Trail San Francisco Bay TrailMichael Jones: Founder, Principal, Alta Planning + Design Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background Willamette River Greenway Oregon Coast Background/History Bike Route Status of Current Legislation Comparable Trails Great Redwood Trail Completed Segments San Francisco Next Steps Bay Trail Potential Goals Photo Tour Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background WillametteA complicated railroad history… River Greenway Oregon• CoastNorthwestern Pacific Railroad (completed 1914) Bike Route • Southern Pacific Railroad • Floods of 1964 Great Redwood• Island Mountain Tunnel Fire 1978 Trail • Eureka Southern 1984 San Francisco Bay• TrailNorth Coast Railroad Authority 1989 • Willits – South Lease to California Northern 1993 • Willits - North Closure 1996 • Closure of entire line 1998Juan Bautista de Anza Trail • NWP Co new freight operator 2010 • SMART 2012 Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background San Francisco Bay Trail Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background WillametteFacts…. River Greenway Oregon Coast Bike• RouteLength: • Larkspur–Cloverdale 72.7 miles • Cloverdale – Willits 54.3 miles Great Redwood •Trail Willits-Arcata 153.0 miles San Francisco Bay• TrailTotal 280.0 miles • Major Trestles 19 • Bridges 38 •
  • Park Lane II Apartments Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration

    Park Lane II Apartments Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration

    PARK LANE II APARTMENTS City Project File# MJP14-010 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of Santa Rosa Planning and Economic Development Department 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Rm. 3 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Contact: Susie Murray, City Planner Prepared by: Metropolitan Planning Group 499 Humboldt Street Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Date: March 17, 2017 [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 Park Lane II Apartments NOTICE OF INTENT DATE: April 21, 2017 TO: Public Agencies, Organizations and Interested Parties FROM: Susie Murray, City Planner SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the “Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970” as amended to date, this is to advise you that the Department of Planning and Economic Development of the City of Santa Rosa has prepared an Initial Study on the following project: Project Name: PARK LANE II APARTMENTS Location: 1001 Doubles Drive, Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, CA APN: 035-690-103 Property Description: The project site is located within the Courtside Village Planned Development on a ±1 acre parcel that is undeveloped. Access will be taken from a new driveway at Double Drive, south of Sebastopol Road. The site is surrounded by existing development on all sides including Sebastopol Road to the north, Doubles Drive and a church to the east, Millbrook Subdivision to the south and mixed-use residential to the west. Pursuant to the City’s General Plan Land Use Diagram, the project site is designated as Low Density Residential.
  • Join PEAK. Join More Than 365 Grantmaking Organizations – Your Peers Leading the Way in Philanthropy – As a Dues-Paying PEAK Grantmaking Organization Member

    Join PEAK. Join More Than 365 Grantmaking Organizations – Your Peers Leading the Way in Philanthropy – As a Dues-Paying PEAK Grantmaking Organization Member

    Where Opportunity Takes Root We are a family-led foundation that creates access to opportunity for people and communities by improving K-12 education, protecting the environment and advancing the quality of life in our home region. waltonfamilyfdn waltonfamilyfoundation waltonfamilyfoundation.org waltonfamilyfdn Welcome to PEAK2020: Courage in Practice PEAK Grantmaking's 16th annual conference and the sector’s largest gathering of grants management professionals. This year is a new milestone – our largest conference organizational culture, and complex grantmaking yet – bringing together more than 900 practitioners, systems to enact this change. along with experts and partners, and supportive businesses. For us, it is an affirmation of the value of We dedicate PEAK2020 to you: Fuel your inspiration what we’ve all built together: a deeply committed, and let’s take the next step together to embrace intensively supportive, member-centered community courage in practice. that’s dedicated to the “how” of grantmaking. Onward! For more than two decades, PEAK Grantmaking The PEAK Grantmaking team & has elevated the profession of grants management your PEAK2020 Conference Co-chairs by focusing on practices and their improvement. Thanks to the participation of 4,500 members across 14 chapters, a group of 200-plus volunteers, and the 365 grantmaking organizations and consultants that Shonda Barnett help power the work as dues-paying members, our Senior Manager – Grants network continues to grow and thrive. Texas Women’s Foundation With the 2019 launch of our Principles for Peak Grantmaking, PEAK issued a call to action to Candy M. Champion philanthropy to courageously lead the way in Grants Manager implementing equitable, effective, and efficient Turner Foundation grantmaking practices – transforming how grants get made.