DOCSLIB.ORG

Park Lane II Apartments Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Park Lane II Apartments Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration PARK LANE II APARTMENTS City Project File# MJP14-010 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of Santa Rosa Planning and Economic Development Department 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Rm. 3 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Contact: Susie Murray, City Planner Prepared by: Metropolitan Planning Group 499 Humboldt Street Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Date: March 17, 2017 [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 Park Lane II Apartments NOTICE OF INTENT DATE: April 21, 2017 TO: Public Agencies, Organizations and Interested Parties FROM: Susie Murray, City Planner SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW AND INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the “Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970” as amended to date, this is to advise you that the Department of Planning and Economic Development of the City of Santa Rosa has prepared an Initial Study on the following project: Project Name: PARK LANE II APARTMENTS Location: 1001 Doubles Drive, Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, CA APN: 035-690-103 Property Description: The project site is located within the Courtside Village Planned Development on a ±1 acre parcel that is undeveloped. Access will be taken from a new driveway at Double Drive, south of Sebastopol Road. The site is surrounded by existing development on all sides including Sebastopol Road to the north, Doubles Drive and a church to the east, Millbrook Subdivision to the south and mixed-use residential to the west. Pursuant to the City’s General Plan Land Use Diagram, the project site is designated as Low Density Residential. The parcel is within the Planned Development (Courtside Village) zoning district. Project Description: The project includes the development of an approximately 34,500 square foot building containing 24 attached residential dwelling units on a vacant ±1-acre lot located within the Planned Development (Courtside Village) zoning district. The project would result in a new structure onsite with a maximum height of 35 feet, surface parking, carports, and ancillary improvements. Site development would include the removal/abandonment of a limited number of utilities, grubbing and vegetation removal, site grading, and construction of the attached multifamily residential building, parking and driveways, landscaping, and amenities. Parking onsite would consist of 60 parking spaces, including surface spaces and designated carport stalls and garages located on the first floor of the building on the south side. A new 26- foot wide driveway at Doubles Drive will provide the vehicle access point into the project. A secondary 20-foot wide emergency vehicle access (EVA) would be located at the western limit of the site at Arthur Ashe Circle; this access would only be utilized by emergency equipment and personnel. Environmental Issues: The Project would result in potentially significant impacts to Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise and Traffic and Circulation. All Project impacts can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through implementation of mitigation measures and through compliance with existing Municipal Code requirements or City standards. Mitigation measures are summarized in the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) and the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. This environmental document has been prepared in consultation with local and state responsible and trustee agencies and in accordance with Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A 30-day public review period for the IS/MND shall commence on April 24, 2017. Written comments must be sent to the City of Santa Rosa, Department of Planning and Economic Development, Planning Division, 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 3, Santa Rosa CA 95402 by May 24, 2017. The City of Santa Rosa Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and project merits on May 25, 2017, at or after 4:00 p.m. in the Santa Rosa City Council Chambers located at City Hall, 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA. Correspondence and comments can be delivered to Susie Murray, City Planner, phone: (707) 543-4348, email: [email protected]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Project Title: Park Lane II Apartments 2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Santa Rosa Planning and Economic Development Department Planning Division 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 3 Santa Rosa, California 95404 3. Contact Person & Phone Number: Susie Murray, City Planner Phone number: (707) 543-4348 Email: [email protected] 4. Project Location: 1001 Doubles Drive, Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, CA Assessor’s Parcel No. 035-690-103 5. Project Sponsor's Name & Address: Project Sponsor: Art Bergesen PAB LLC 5241 Sunridge Drive Fairfield, CA 94543 Sponsor’s Representative: Mike Zalkaske 1031 Rancho Lindo Drive Petaluma, CA 94952 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (2.0 to 8.0 Dwelling units per acre) 7. Zoning: PD (Planned Development) zoning district (Courtside Village Planned Development Area) 8. Description of Project: The project includes the development of an approximately 34,500 square foot building containing 24 attached residential dwelling units on a vacant approximately ±1-acre lot located within the Planned Development (Courtside Village) zoning district. The project would result in a new structure onsite with a maximum height of 35 feet, surface parking, carports, and ancillary improvements. Site development would include the removal/abandonment of a limited number of utilities, grubbing and vegetation removal, site grading, and construction of the attached multifamily residential building, parking and driveways, landscaping, and amenities. Parking onsite would consist of 60 parking stalls, including surface spaces and designated carport stalls located beneath the first floor of the building on the south side. A new 26-foot wide driveway at Doubles Drive will provide the sole vehicle access point into the project. A secondary 20-foot wide emergency vehicle access (EVA) would be located at the western limit of the site at Arthur Ashe Circle; this access would only be utilized by emergency equipment and personnel. See expanded project description below for further project details. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is located at 1001 Doubles Drive, at the intersection of Sebastopol Road and Doubles Drive (APN 035-690-103), in southwest Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California. The project site is approximately 2.5 miles west of Highway 101. The site is located within the Courtside Village Planned Development, and has approximately 300 feet of frontage along Sebastopol Road. The approximately ±1-acre site is currently vacant and remains in an undeveloped state. Existing development surrounds the project site on all sides. To the north of the site is Sebastopol Road and beyond is mixed use development. To the west is mixed use residential, to the south is single-family residential, to the east is Doubles Road and beyond is civic recreation consisting of a church and a public park. The site is generally flat and lacks significant surface features, drainages, or known natural biological communities. There are several existing easements on the subject parcel including a 20-foot wide public sewer easement, a public storm drain easement, and a pedestrian access easement that runs parallel to Doubles Drive along the western boundary of the site. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required: None Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 Park Lane II Apartments PARK LANE II APARTMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE # 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ....................................................................... 20 3.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 21 I. AESTHETICS ...................................................................................................................................... 21 II. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ............................................................................ 24 III. AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................... 25 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 29 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. 34 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ....................................................................................................................... 38 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ...................................................................................................... 42 VIII. HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................................................................... 46 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................... 49 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay
    The Final Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program February 2021 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning Therese Trivedi Assistant Director Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | i Table of Contents I. Summary of Conformity Analysis ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Control Measures .................................................................................................... 7 History of Transportation Control Measures .............................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Control Measures................................................................................ 9 III. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Conformity Findings ...................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | ii I. Summary of Conformity Analysis The
    [Show full text]
  • Roadway Project Listings
    Roadway Project Listings Roadway Projects Alameda County State Highway Projects TIP ID: ALA050079 County: Alameda System: State Highway RTP ID: 17-01-0040 CTIPS 20600003665 Sponsor: Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Implementing Agency: Caltrans Project Name: I-80 Gilman Interchange Improvements Description: Berkeley: On Gilman Ave at I-80: Reconfigure interchange providing dual roundabout at the entrance & exits from I-80 as well as the Eastshore Hwy & West Frontage Rd and bike/ped overcrossing. Project also references RTP ID 17-01-0001. Air Quality Exempt Code: 5.04 - EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment Route: 80 Post Mile From: 6.4 Post Mile To: 6.8 Toll Credits: All funding in thousands of dollars Phase Fund Source Prior Years FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 Future Years Total Programmed PE EARMARK $ 1,080 $ 1,080 PE OTHER LOCAL $ 354 $ 354 PE SALESTAX- $ 4,179 $ 4,179 PSE SALESTAX- $ 6,172 $ 6,172 ROW RIP $ 2,445 $ 2,445 ROW SALESTAX- $ 200 $ 200 CON ATP-REG $ 4,152 $ 4,152 CON RIP $ 38,784 $ 38,784 CON SALESTAX- $ 4,358 $ 4,358 Total Programmed Funding: $ 11,985 $ 49,739 $ 61,724 TIP ID: ALA170002 County: Alameda System: State Highway RTP ID: 17-01-0037 CTIPS 20600006072 Sponsor: Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Implementing Agency: Alameda County Transportation Project Name: I-80/Ashby Avenue Interchange Improvements Description: Alameda County: I-80/Ashby IC: Reconstruct the interchange including constructing new bridge, two roundabouts and bike/ped improvements
    [Show full text]
  • MTC, Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area
    Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Metropolitan Transportation Commission RReeggiioonnaall BBiiccyyccllee PPllaann ffoorr tthhee SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo BBaayy AArreeaa 22000099 UUppddaattee March 2009 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers transportation consultants Table of Contents Chapter Page Table Page 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 3.1 Average Bay Area weekday bicycle trips .................................... 14 2. Goals and Policies ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Average Bay Area weekend bicycle trips ..................................... 15 3. Background ......................................................................................... 11 3.3 Average Bay Area total bicycle trips ............................................ 16 • Physical setting ............................................................................... 11 3.4 Bay Area daily journey‐to‐work commuters ............................... 17 • Trip‐making trends ........................................................................ 12 3.5 Bay
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study with Exhibits
    MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I INITIAL STUDY Davis Townhomes 6737 Sebastopol Avenue CITY OF SEBASTOPOL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 7120 BODEGA AVENUE SEBASTOPOL, CALIFORNIA 95472 March 7:2019 I. Environmental Checklist Forms - Mitigated Negative Declaration 1. Project Title Davis Townhomes 2. Lead Agency Name and City of Sebastopol — Planning Department, 7120 Bodega Address Avenue, Sebastopol, CA 95472 3. Contact Person and Phone Dana Morrison, Assistant Planner. (707) 823-6167 Number 4. Project Location 6737 Sebastopol Avenue [aka SR12), Sebastopol Ca 95472 (APN 004-063-036) 5. Project Sponsor’s Name Dan Davis — 1051 Todd Road, Santa Rosa Ca 95407 and_Address 6. General Plan Designation Central Core 7. Zoning Downtown Core 8. Description of Project The Project proposes development of eighteen (18); attached, 1,180 square foot, 2-bedroom, 1.5 bathroom, 2- story townhomes on a 1.74 acre lot. The proposed town homes are clustered around a central open space, in three clusters. Lot sizes vary from —1250 to —1800 square feet. The town homes are proposed to have 6-foot-deep front and rear porches (which will have a storage closet). In addition, there will be private rear yards of a minimum 20 feet deep by 20 feet wide with rear gates. Project will include 18 carport spaces along with 18 assigned surface parking spaces and two (2) visitor parking spaces, for a total of 38 parking space. The proposed development also includes gated driveway access to Park Village (to be used in case of emergency), fire and emergency vehicle access, storm water retention areas, and new landscaping including the addition of 56 new trees, trash and recycling enclosure, and one ganged mail box.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Redwood Trail: a Vision of the Future
    The Great Redwood Trail: A Vision of the Future 2019 California State Trails Conference Willamette River Greenway Oregon Coast Bike Route Caryl Hart: Board Member, North Coast Great Redwood Railroad Authority Trail San Francisco Bay TrailMichael Jones: Founder, Principal, Alta Planning + Design Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background Willamette River Greenway Oregon Coast Background/History Bike Route Status of Current Legislation Comparable Trails Great Redwood Trail Completed Segments San Francisco Next Steps Bay Trail Potential Goals Photo Tour Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background WillametteA complicated railroad history… River Greenway Oregon• CoastNorthwestern Pacific Railroad (completed 1914) Bike Route • Southern Pacific Railroad • Floods of 1964 Great Redwood• Island Mountain Tunnel Fire 1978 Trail • Eureka Southern 1984 San Francisco Bay• TrailNorth Coast Railroad Authority 1989 • Willits – South Lease to California Northern 1993 • Willits - North Closure 1996 • Closure of entire line 1998Juan Bautista de Anza Trail • NWP Co new freight operator 2010 • SMART 2012 Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background San Francisco Bay Trail Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Los Angeles/San Diego Urban Trails Background WillametteFacts…. River Greenway Oregon Coast Bike• RouteLength: • Larkspur–Cloverdale 72.7 miles • Cloverdale – Willits 54.3 miles Great Redwood •Trail Willits-Arcata 153.0 miles San Francisco Bay• TrailTotal 280.0 miles • Major Trestles 19 • Bridges 38 •
    [Show full text]
  • City of Healdsburg Parks and Recreation Commission Special Meeting – Agenda
    CITY OF HEALDSBURG PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING – AGENDA Healdsburg City Council Chambers Meeting Date: August 9, 2017 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg CA 95448 Time: 6:00 P.M. Phone: 707-431-3301 Date Posted: August 4, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER a) Roll Call b) Pledge of Allegiance c) Changes (Deletions) from Agenda d) Approval of Minutes: June 21, 2017 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS This time is set aside to receive comments from the public regarding matters of general interest not on the agenda, but related to Commission business. Pursuant to the Brown Act, however, the Commission cannot consider any issues or take action on any requests during this comment period. 3. OLD BUSINESS 4. NEW BUSINESS a) Sonoma County Integrated Parks Plan (Themig) Receive a presentation from Sonoma County Regional Parks on the Sonoma County Integrated Parks Plan and provide feedback as desired b) Sorrento Development Art Installation (Licea) Review a proposal from the Voight Foundation for the installation of a piece of artwork for Sorrento Park c) City of Healdsburg Request to Allow the Consumption of Alcohol at Plaza Park at Business Showcase on October 11, 2017 (Jahns) Review a request from the City of Healdsburg, in conjunction with the Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce, to allow the Consumption of Alcohol at the Business Showcase on October 11, 2017 and by motion make a recommendation to City Council to approve or deny the request 5. INFORMATION AND REPORT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITIES (Staff, Information Only) a) Summer Activities Update b) Subcommittee Structure c) Other 6. COMMISSION REPORTS ON MATTERS OF INTEREST OCCURRING SINCE PREVIOUS REGULAR MEETING SB 343 - DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Parks and Recreation Commission regarding any item on this agenda after the posting of this agenda and not otherwise exempt from disclosure, will be made available for public review in the Parks and Recreation Office located at 1557 Healdsburg Avenue during normal business hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 2019-2024
    Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 2019-2024 Regional Parks General Government Transportation and Public Works Sonoma Water County of Sonoma and Sonoma Water Capital Improvement Plan Authors and Agencies General Services Department Regional Parks Department Caroline Judy, Director Bert Whitaker, Director Transportation and Sonoma Water Public Works Department Grant Davis, General Manager Johannes J. Hoevertsz, Director Development Team Facilities Planning Toni Holland, Capital Project Manager Committee Members Sandra Gallant, Project Manager Caroline Judy, General Services Director Jared Osborn, Data Systems Analyst Keith Lew, Deputy Director Gloria Clark, Publication Designer Bruce Oveson, Sr. Capital Projects Manager Toni Holland, Capital Project Manager Marc McDonald, Real Estate Manager Katherine DiPasqua, Administrative Analyst III, CAO Jane Elias, Energy and Sustainability Manager Tamra Pinoris, ASO II Eric Herrman, Facilities & Maintenance Manager Department and Agency Liaisons Toni Holland, General Services Monique Chapman, Transportation and Public Works Steve Ehret, Regional Parks Elizabeth Tyree, Regional Parks Kent Gylfe, Sonoma Water 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Page B-1 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . B-3 II. GENERAL GOVERNMENT . B-11 Overview . .B-13 Prioritized Project Description List . B-21 Project Funding Sources . .B-25 Projects Organized by Categories . .B-33 Project Details Organized by Priority . .B-38 III. REGIONAL PARKS . C-1 Overview . C-3 Overview of Funding Sources. C-5 Project Details Organized Alphabetically . C-9 List of Regional Parks & Map . C-118 IV. TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS . D-1 Overview . D-3 Airport Division . D-3 Integrated Waste Division . D-4 Roads Division . D-4 Transit Division . D-6 Project Details Organized by Division . D-7 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Air Quality Conformity and Consistency Report
    DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting 10/15/2013
    AGENDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SONOMA COUNTY 575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE, ROOM 102A SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 TUESDAY OCTOBER 15, 2013 8:30 A.M. (The regular afternoon session commences at 2:00 p.m.) Susan Gorin First District Veronica A. Ferguson County Administrator David Rabbitt Second District Bruce Goldstein County Counsel Shirlee Zane Third District Mike McGuire Fourth District Efren Carrillo Fifth District This is a simultaneous meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Sonoma County, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency, the Board of Commissioners of the Community Development Commission, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District, the Board of Directors of the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District, the Sonoma County Public Finance Authority, and as the governing board of all special districts having business on the agenda to be heard this date. Each of the foregoing entities is a separate and distinct legal entity. The Board welcomes you to attend its meetings which are regularly scheduled each Tuesday at 8:30 a.m. Your interest is encouraged and appreciated. AGENDAS AND MATERIALS: Agendas and most supporting materials are available on the Board’s website at http://www.sonoma-county.org/board/. Due to legal, copyright, privacy or policy considerations, not all materials are posted online. Materials that are not posted are available for public inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at 575 Administration Drive, Room 100A, Santa Rosa, CA. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Board of Supervisors office at 575 Administration Drive, Room 100A, Santa Rosa, CA, during normal business hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petaluma & Santa Rosa Electric Railway
    The Petaluma & Santa Rosa Electric Railway – Electric Railway Pioneer By Allen Tacy Prologue The Petaluma & Santa Rosa Railroad was the creation of Petalumans. They conceived it. They lead its board of directors. They provided much of its finance from the new local prosperity generated by the rise of the chicken and egg business, which boomed into prominence at the turn of the Twentieth Century. Its headquarters lay there. The idea for its inception grew out of an intense political and commercial rivalry between Petaluma and Santa Rosa. Political because Petaluma was staunchly Republican. Santa Rosa a stronghold of Democratic persuasion and seen by Petalumans as the thief which had stolen the county seat. Petaluma was talking secession at the time. Although Petaluma in 1900 was one of the busiest ports in California, she was losing ground because of the steam railroad, the San Francisco & North Pacific. That line's Tiburon route was faster by far than sternwheel steamboats could passage the multiple twists and turns of Petaluma Creek. Now in 1903, to make matters worse, the SF&NP had fallen into the hands of The Octopus, the universally hated Southern Pacific. Californian widely believed its rates and charges were prejudicial to the great commercial development they felt could be theirs if only the road's charges were less. Petaluma had an ace in the hole: cheap waterborne transportation, which SP could not hope to control. The new P&SR would lever that advantage and open up the apple country around Sebastopol as well. Petaluma's "past can be seen as a microcosm of California as a whole", writes Adair Haig in her History of Petaluma.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebastopol Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Amended November 1, 2011
    CITY OF SEBASTOPOL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN AMENDED NOVEMBER, 2011 Sebastopol Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 Purposes of the Plan 1 Vision Statement 2 Caltrans Compliance 3 2. Setting and Context 4 Land Use History 4 Jurisdiction Overview Setting and Land Use 4 Attractors and Generators 4 Schools and Safe Routes 5 Parks and Community Facilities 7 Sebastopol Demographics and Commute Patterns 7 Local Opportunities and Constraints 10 Data Collection Recommendations 10 3. Vision, Goal, Objectives and Policies 12 Vision, Goal, Objectives and Policies 12 Relationship to Other Plans and Policies 17 4. The Local Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation 24 Network Existing Conditions 24 Proposed Improvements 29 5. Project Costs and Funding 30 Costs 30 Past Expenditures 30 Funding Sources 30 Appendices A: Caltrans Checklist B: Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Locations C: Existing and Proposed Bikeways and Pedestrian Facilities Table 4 - Existing Bikeways Table 5 - Proposed Bikeways, Est. Costs and Priorities Table 6 - Planning Level Cost Assumptions for Bike Facility Improvements Table 7 - Proposed Pedestrian Facilities and Misc. Projects D: MAP - PROPOSED AND EXISTING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL SCTA Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan City of Sebastopol Amended: November 2011 1.! Introduction This Sebastopol Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan was developed as a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority‘s (SCTA’s) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. While part of the Master Plan, the Sebastopol plan is also a stand-alone document to be used by the City of Sebastopol to guide implementation of local projects and programs and document city policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Rodota Trail
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation May 27, 2004 JOE RODOTA/WEST COUNTY RAIL TO TRAIL EXTENSION: ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION File No. 02-024 Project Manager: Maxene Spellman RECOMMENDED ACTION: Modification of the Conservancy’s April 25, 2002 authorization to disburse funds to Sonoma County Regional Parks for the Joe Rodota/West County Regional Trail project through: 1) authorization to disburse additional funds up to $197,000 as an augmen- tation of the grant, for a total authorization of up to $447,000 for the project; and 2) revision of the scope of the project to include the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle bridge over Santa Rosa Creek, rather than trail construction on an existing railroad right-of-way overpass, and to include the construction of the remaining segment of the Joe Rodota/West County Regional Trail. LOCATION: Downtown area of the City of Santa Rosa, Sonoma County (Exhibit 1) PROGRAM CATEGORY: San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location and Site Map Exhibit 2: April 25, 2002 Staff Recommendation Exhibit 3: Photographs RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Sections 31160-31164 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby modifies the Conservancy’ April 25, 2002 authorization to disburse funds to the Sonoma County Regional Parks for the Joe Rodota/West County Re- gional Trail project as follows: 1) authorizes the disbursement of an additional amount not to exceed one hundred ninety-seven thousand dollars ($197,000) for a total authorization of up to four hundred forty-seven thousand dollars ($447,000) for the project; and 2) revises the scope of the project to include the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle bridge over Santa Rosa Creek, rather than trail construction on an existing railroad right-of-way overpass, and to include the Page 1 of 6 JOE RODOTA/WEST COUNTY RAIL TO TRAIL EXTENSION: ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION construction of the remaining segment of the Joe Rodota/West County Regional Trail.
    [Show full text]