DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Secretariat RP/PAA Brussels, 4 May 2016 FINAL VOTING LIST

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Secretariat RP/PAA Brussels, 4 May 2016 FINAL VOTING LIST Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Secretariat RP/PAA Brussels, 4 May 2016 FINAL VOTING LIST on the DRAFT OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs for the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/477/EC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons 2015/0269(COD) Rapporteur: Bodil Valero PA: FDR 1086046 AM: FDR 1091371 Text in AM Tabled by Position Comments Result consideration of the rapport eur – AM 26 Beatrix von Storch - Voted together also REJECTED with the following AMs relating to a Title 1 AM 27 Gerard Batten - REJECTED full rejection: 26, 27, 29, 30 and 32 Citation 1 AM 29 Jeroen Lenaers - REJECTED Citation 2 AM 30 Beatrix von Storch - REJECTED Recital 1 a (new) AM 32 Harald Vilimsky, - REJECTED Lorenzo Fontana, Gilles Lebreton Article 1 – paragraph AM 92 Sylvie Guillaume, - REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point -a Christine Revault (new) D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Virginie Rozière, Eric Andrieu COMP 5 + Covers AMS 94, 96, DROPPED 98, 99 Article 1 – paragraph AM 93 Kristina Winberg - falls if COMP 5 is APPROVED 1 – point 1 – point a adopted 46/5 Article 1 – paragraph 1b Article 1 – paragraph AM 94 Cecilia Wikström, + falls if COMP 5 or DROPPED 1 – point 1 – point a Fredrick Federley, AM 93 is adopted Article 1 – paragraph Dita Charanzová, Petr 1b Ježek Identical AM 96 Emil Radev + Voted together DROPPED AM 99 Jussi Halla-aho, + DROPPED 1 Richard Sulík, Tomáš Zdechovský, Anders Primdahl Vistisen, Timothy Kirkhope, Kristina Winberg, Bernd Kölmel, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Hannu Takkula AM 98 Sylvie Guillaume, + falls if COMP 5 or DROPPED Christine Revault AM 93 is adopted D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Virginie Rozière, Eric Andrieu AM 3 Rapporteur Withdrawn Article 1 – paragraph AM 95 Miriam Dalli + Voted separately 1 – point 1 – point a Requested by S&D Article 1 – paragraph 1b 1st part: "For the purposes ....... to be mounted" Falls if COMP 5 or AM 93 is adopted 2nd part new adding : "Member states REJECTED shall ...... to possess them" Falls if AM 93 is adopted Article 1 – paragraph AM 97 Gérard Deprez, Louis - Falls if COMP 5 or DROPPED 1 – point 1 – point a Michel AM 93is adopted Article 1 – paragraph 1b Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol - Falls if COMP 5 or DROPPED 1 – point 1 – point a 100 Guzmán, Barbara AM 93 is adopted Article 1 – paragraph Spinelli, Kostas 1b Chrysogonos Article 1 – paragraph AM Jussi Halla-aho, + APPROVED 1 – point 1 – point b 101 Richard Sulík, Tomáš 50/0 Article 1 – paragraph Zdechovský, Anders 1e Primdahl Vistisen, Timothy Kirkhope, Kristina Winberg, Bernd Kölmel, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Hannu Takkula Article 1 – paragraph AM 4 Rapporteur + REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point c Article 1 – paragraph 1f Article 1 – paragraph AM Sylvie Guillaume, 0 Falls if AM 4 is REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point a 102 Christine Revault adopted Article 1 – paragraph D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, 2 1f Virginie Rozière, Eric Andrieu Article 1 – point 1 – AM 5 Rapporteur + REJECTED point c Article 1 – paragraph 1g a (new) Article 1 – point 1 – AM Gérard Deprez, Louis - identical APPROVED point c 103 Michel Article 1 – paragraph AM Jussi Halla-aho, - REJECTED 1h 104 Richard Sulík, Tomáš Zdechovský, Anders Primdahl Vistisen, Timothy Kirkhope, Kristina Winberg, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Hannu Takkula Article 1 – paragraph AM Sylvia-Yvonne + Falls if AMS 103, REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point c 105 Kaufmann, Sergio 104 are adopted Article 1 – paragraph Gaetano Cofferati 1h Article 1 – paragraph AM Kristina Winberg - REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point c 106 Article 1 – paragraph 1i Article 1 – paragraph AM 6 Rapporteur + Falls if AM 106 is REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point c adopted Article 1 – paragraph AM Gérard Deprez, Louis + Falls if AM 106 is APPROVED 1i 107 Michel adopted AM Nuno Melo, Monika 0 Falls if AM 106 is REJECTED 108 Hohlmeier, Roberta adopted Metsola Article 1 – paragraph AM Miriam Dalli + REJECTED 1 – point 1 – point d 109 a (new) Article 1 – paragraph 2 Article 1 – paragraph AM Frank Engel + APPROVED 1 – point 1 a (new) 110 Article 2 – paragraph 1 Article 1 – paragraph AM Cecilia Wikström, - Identical REJECTED 1 – point 2 111 Nathalie Griesbeck, Voted together Article 2 – paragraph Fredrick Federley, 2 Dita Charanzová, Petr Ježek AM Frank Engel - REJECTED 112 3 Article 1 – paragraph AM Jussi Halla-aho, - APPROVED 1 – point 2 113 Richard Sulík, Tomáš Article 2 – paragraph Zdechovský, Anders 2 Primdahl Vistisen, Timothy Kirkhope, Kristina Winberg, Nuno Melo, Bernd Kölmel, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Roberta Metsola, Hannu Takkula AM Miriam Dalli - APPROVED 115 AM Emil Radev - APPROVED 116 Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol - AM 114 falls if AMS DROPPED 1 – point 2 114 Guzmán, Barbara 113, 115 and 116 are Article 2 – paragraph Spinelli, Kostas adopted 2 Chrysogonos Article 1 – paragraph AM Gérard Deprez, Louis + APPROVED 1 – point 2 a (new) 117 Michel Article 1 – paragraph AM Bodil Valero + REJECTED 1 – point 2 a (new) 118 Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 (new) Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol - REJECTED 1 – point 2 a (new) 119 Guzmán, Barbara Article 2 – paragraph Spinelli, Kostas 2 a (new) Chrysogonos Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol - REJECTED 1 – point 2 b (new) 120 Guzmán, Barbara Spinelli COMP 6 + Covers AMS 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 130 Split vote: Agreed by Shadows/ Rapporteur 1st part - the whole text without the APPROVED words: "as well as magazines" 2nd part - "as well as REJECTED magazines" Article 1 – paragraph AM Emil Radev + Identical DROPPED 1 – point 3 121 Article 4 – paragraph Falls if COMP 6 is 4 1 adopted Article 1 – paragraph AM Jussi Halla-aho, + 1 – point 3 122 Richard Sulík, Tomáš Article 4 – paragraph Zdechovský, Anders 1 Primdahl Vistisen, Timothy Kirkhope, Kristina Winberg, Bernd Kölmel, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Hannu Takkula AM Sylvia-Yvonne + Falls if COMP 6 or DROPPED 123 Kaufmann, Sergio AM 121 is adopted Gaetano Cofferati, Birgit Sippel, Caterina Chinnici, Ana Gomes AM Bodil Valero + Falls if COMP 6 or DROPPED 124 AMs 121, 123 is adopted AM Miriam Dalli + Falls if COMP 6 or DROPPED 125 AMs 121, 123, 125 is adopted AM Gérard Deprez, Louis + Falls if COMP 6 or DROPPED 126 Michel AMs 121, 123, 125, 126 is adopted AM 7 Rapporteur Replaced by AM 124 DROPPED not to vote Article 1 – paragraph AM 8 Rapporteur + APPROVED 1 – point 3 AM Sylvia-Yvonne + APPROVED Article 4 – paragraph 129 Kaufmann, Sergio 2 Gaetano Cofferati, Caterina Chinnici, Ana Gomes AM Brice Hortefeux, + APPROVED 128 Rachida Dati, Philippe Juvin AM Jussi Halla-aho, - Falls if COMP 6 is DROPPED 130 Richard Sulík, Tomáš adopted Zdechovský, Anders Primdahl Vistisen, Timothy Kirkhope, Kristina Winberg, Bernd Kölmel, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Hannu Takkula AM Marina Albiol 0 REJECTED 127 Guzmán, Barbara Spinelli, Kostas Chrysogonos Article 1 – paragraph AM 9 Rapporteur + APPROVED 1 – point 3 AM Jussi Halla-aho, APPROVED Article 4 – paragraph 131 Richard Sulík, Tomáš 2 – subparagraph 2 Zdechovský, Anders Primdahl Vistisen, Identical Timothy Kirkhope, 5 Kristina Winberg, Bernd Kölmel, Branislav Škripek, Beatrix von Storch, Hannu Takkula AM Sylvia-Yvonne APPROVED 132 Kaufmann, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Caterina Chinnici Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol - Falls if AM 9, 131, DROPPED 1 – point 3 133 Guzmán, Barbara 132 is adopted Article 4 – paragraph Spinelli, Kostas 2 – subparagraph 2 Chrysogonos AM Gérard Deprez, Louis - Falls if AM 9, 131, DROPPED 134 Michel 132 is adopted Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol - REJECTED 1 – point 3 135 Guzmán, Barbara Article 4 – paragraph Spinelli 2 – subparagraph 4 AM Sylvia-Yvonne + APPROVED 136 Kaufmann, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Caterina Chinnici, Ana Gomes Article 1 – paragraph AM Barbara Matera, 0 REJECTED 1 – point 3 137 Salvatore Domenico Article 4 – paragraph Pogliese, Alessandra 3 Mussolini, Stefano Maullu, Lara Comi AM Frank Engel + REJECTED 138 AM Brice Hortefeux, + APPROVED 139 Rachida Dati, Philippe Juvin Article 1 – paragraph AM Sylvie Guillaume, + APPROVED 1 – point 4 – point a 140 Christine Revault Article 4 – paragraph D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, 4 – subparagraph 1 Virginie Rozière, Eric Andrieu AM Barbara Matera, + REJECTED 141 Alessandra Mussolini, Salvatore Domenico Pogliese, Stefano Maullu, Lara Comi AM Sylvia-Yvonne + REJECTED. 142 Kaufmann, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Caterina Chinnici, Ana Gomes AM Gérard Deprez, Louis + APPROVED 143 Michel Article 1 – point 4 – AM 10 Rapporteur + REJECTED point a Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – sentence 2 Article 1 – paragraph AM Barbara Matera, + REJECTED 6 1 – point 4 – point b 144 Salvatore Domenico Article 4 – paragraph Pogliese, Alessandra 4 – subparagraph 2 Mussolini, Stefano Maullu, Lara Comi AM Sylvie Guillaume, + REJECTED 145 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Virginie Rozière, Eric Andrieu Article 1 – paragraph AM Gérard Deprez, Louis + Identical REJECTED 1 – point 5 146 Michel Article 4b – AM Marina Albiol paragraph 1 147 Guzmán, Barbara Spinelli Article 1 – paragraph AM Frank Engel + REJECTED 1 – point 5 148 Article 4b – paragraph 1 – point b Article 1 – paragraph AM Brice Hortefeux, + APPROVED 1 – point 5 149 Rachida Dati, Philippe Article 4b – Juvin paragraph 2 AM Barbara Matera, 0 REJECTED 150 Salvatore Domenico Pogliese, Alessandra Mussolini, Stefano Maullu, Lara Comi Article 1 – paragraph AM Marina Albiol 0 REJECTED 1 – point 6 151 Guzmán, Barbara Article
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Opinion
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgets 2016/0225(COD) 25.4.2017 OPINION of the Committee on Budgets for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union Resettlement Framework and amending Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0468 – C8-0325/2016 – 2016/0225(COD)) Rapporteur: Gérard Deprez AD\1124089EN.docx PE601.018v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PA_Legam PE601.018v02-00 2/11 AD\1124089EN.docx EN SHORT JUSTIFICATION The rapporteur is of the opinion that the EU is in urgent need of an integrated, sustainable migration policy, based on solidarity and fair burden-sharing between all Member States. He believes that the creation of legal ways to seek refuge in Europe could avoid tragic deaths in the Mediterranean Sea and break down the business model of migrant smugglers. The rapporteur supports linking the proposed recast of the ‘Dublin regulation’1 to the present proposal, so that the number of resettled persons is added to the number of applications for international protection for the purpose of calculating the corrective allocation mechanism. The rapporteur is also in favour of establishing a link with the recast Eurodac regulation2 so that data on resettled persons will be stored in the Eurodac system. In terms of its budgetary implications, despite the absence of a well-defined quota of persons to be resettled in the proposal, the rapporteur wishes that these resettlement plans should be ambitious and that the means necessary for their implementation be made available.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 2018/0178(COD) 17.12.2018 AMENDMENTS 386 - 662 Draft report Bas Eickhout, Sirpa Pietikäinen (PE630.512v01-00) Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment Proposal for a regulation (COM(2018)0353 – C8-0207/2018 – 2018/0178(COD)) AM\1172567EN.docx PE632.154v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE632.154v01-00 2/123 AM\1172567EN.docx EN Amendment 386 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 387 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 388 Paul Tang, Pervenche Berès Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 389 Simona Bonafè, Luigi Morgano Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment AM\1172567EN.docx 3/123 PE632.154v01-00 EN 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 390 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or. en Amendment 391 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgets 2017/0351(COD) 20.6.2018 OPINION of the Committee on Budgets for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems (borders and visa) and amending Council Decision 2004/512/EC, Regulation (EC) No 767/2008, Council Decision 2008/633/JHA, Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 (COM(2017)0793 – C8-0002/2018 – 2017/0351(COD)) Rapporteur for opinion: Bernd Kölmel AD\1156513EN.docx PE616.791v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PA_Legam PE616.791v02-00 2/9 AD\1156513EN.docx EN SHORT JUSTIFICATION The rapporteur welcomes the two Commission proposals for a regulation for establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems adopted on 12 December 2017. Both proposals aim at overcoming structural shortcomings in the present EU information management architecture by making information systems interoperable, i.e. able to exchange data and share information. The rapporteur fully subscribes to their purpose, which is to ensure fast access to information, including by law enforcement authorities, to detect multiple identities and combat identity fraud, to facilitate identity checks of third- country nationals and to facilitate the prevention, investigation or prosecution of serious crime and terrorism. The present opinion concerns the proposal on borders and visa, which aims to regulate access to the Visa Information System, the Schengen Information System as currently regulated by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006, the Entry-Exit System (EES) and the European Travel information and Authorisation System (ETIAS).
    [Show full text]
  • List of LIBE-Members
    Sheet1 Heinz K. BECKER Member Austria epp Harald VILIMSKY Member Austria enf @vilimsky Josef WEIDENHOLZER Member Austria sd @Weidenholzer Ulrike LUNACEK Substitute Austria greensefa @UlrikeLunacek Angelika MLINAR Substitute Austria aldeadle @AngelikaMlinar Louis MICHEL Member Belgium aldeadle @LouisMichel Helga STEVENS Member Belgium ecr @StevensHelga Gérard DEPREZ Substitute Belgium aldeadle @gerardeprez Sander LOONES Substitute Belgium ecr @SanderLoones Sergei STANISHEV Vice-Chair Bulgaria sd @SergeiStanishev Asim Ahmedov ADEMOV Member Bulgaria epp Filiz HYUSMENOVA Member Bulgaria aldeadle Emil RADEV Substitute Bulgaria epp @Emil_Radev Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ Member Czech Republic epp @TomZdechovsky Petr JEŽEK Substitute Czech Republic aldeadle @JezekCZ Jaromír ŠTĚTINA Substitute Czech Republic epp @StetinaEP Morten Helveg PETERSEN Substitute Denmark aldeadle @mortenhelveg Anders Primdahl VISTISEN Substitute Denmark ecr @AndersVistisen Marju LAURISTIN Member Estonia sd @LauristinMarju Jussi HALLA-AHO Member Finland ecr @Halla_aho Petri SARVAMAA Substitute Finland epp @petrisarvamaa Rachida DATI Member France epp @datirachida Nathalie GRIESBECK Member France aldeadle Sylvie GUILLAUME Member France sd @sylvieguillaume Brice HORTEFEUX Member France epp @BriceHortefeux Eva JOLY Member France greensefa @EvaJoly Marie-Christine VERGIAT Member France guengl @MCVergiat Nicolas BAY Substitute France enf @nicolasbayfn Joëlle BERGERON Substitute France efd Gilles LEBRETON Substitute France enf @Gilles_Lebreton Nadine MORANO Substitute France epp @nadine__morano
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Made Simple
    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MADE SIMPLE 2014-2019 The European Parliament Made Simple is produced by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) as a introduction to the workings of the European Parliament for amateurs and experts alike. Production Team Editor and project manager Giovanni Mastrobuono Senior Communications Officer Editorial assistance Alexandrine Gauvin Communications Officer Eli Corso-Phinney Communications Intern The information contained in this publication has been compiled in good faith and is accurate according to the most recent sources available at the time of going to press. Photographs used with the kind permission of the Audiovisual Libraries of the European Commission, Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. First edition, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-9146856-7-2 Printed in Belgium American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Avenue des Arts 53, B-1000 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 513 68 92 Fax: +32 (0)2 513 79 28 [email protected] www.amchameu.eu Foreword Susan Danger Managing Director American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union t is with great pleasure that I present AmCham EU’s newest guide, The European Parliament Made Simple. The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2009, gave the European Parliament greater power in EU Idecision-making and an increased role in selecting and approving the European Commission. As a result, this year’s European election has a greater democratic influence than ever before. With this in mind, AmCham EU has published The European Parliament Made Simple to explain the Parliament’s expanded powers and roles, for both the Brussels policy community and public affairs professionals in the EU and US.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • 068517/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/07/21
    068517/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 09/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 July 2021 (OR. en) 10606/21 PE-RE 9 'I/A' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee/Council Subject: RESOLUTIONS and DECISIONS adopted by the European Parliament at its plenary part-session in Strasbourg from 5 to 8 July 2021 The Council is invited to take note of the following acts adopted by the European Parliament. At the above mentioned part-session, the European Parliament adopted 43 acts1 as follows : – 15 legislative acts – 28 non-legislative acts I. LEGISLATIVE ACTS A. ORDINARY LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE First reading 1. Use of technologies for the processing of data for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse (temporary derogation from Directive 2002/58/EC) Report: Birgit Sippel (A9-0258/2020) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0319 2. Recognition of third countries certificates in inland navigation Report: Andris Ameriks (A9-0210/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0320 1 To consult the acts, Ctrl + click on the hyperlink (P9 reference) contained in the text concerned. You will be directed to the act as published on the European Parliament's website. 10606/21 FFF/icf 1 GIP.2 EN www.parlament.gv.at Second reading 3. Streamlining measures for the realisation of the TEN-T Report: Dominique Riquet (A9-0223/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0318 4. Internal Security Fund Report: Monika Hohlmeier (A9-0221/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0324 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]