DOCSLIB.ORG

Christian Promitzer Austria and the Balkans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christian Promitzer Austria and the Balkans See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298721818 Austria and the Balkans: Exploring the role of travelogues in the construction of an area Chapter · January 2015 CITATIONS READS 3 530 1 author: Christian Promitzer Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz 29 PUBLICATIONS 46 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Racial Anthropology and Eugenics in Bulgaria View project Infectious diseases in the Balkans (19th and early 20th centuries) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Christian Promitzer on 17 March 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. CHRISTIAN PROMITZER AUSTRIA AND THE BALKANS: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF TRAVELOGUES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN AREA INTRODUCTION One of the main purposes of area studies is the virtual construction of those very spaces that form the basis of their existence. This statement does not in- tend to postulate that the determination of global areas is totally arbitrary (the definition of certain spaces as “historical regions” is also a matter of plausibil- ity), but it wants to bring to the foreground the intellectual energy that has to be invested, before a “historical” area can come into being. This is especially the case with the volatile region that depending on the respective viewpoint of an author may be called “Southeastern Europe,” “South-East Europe,” or the “Balkans”. In the last two decades Karl Kaser, Maria Todorova, Holm Sundhaussen, Alexis Drace Francis, Dietmar Müller and many others have tried to either deconstruct or reify these areal concepts within their given histor- ical foci of interest. Both Todorova’s suggestion that a region should be under- stood on the basis of its common historical legacy and Kaser’s simple, but not simplistic, relativization that the respective boundaries of “Southeastern Eu- rope” depend on the leading questions a scholar asks are most convincing.1 1 See Karl Kaser, Südosteuropäische Geschichte und Geschichtswissenschaft, UTB 8224 (Vi- enna – Cologne – Weimar: Böhlau, 2nd revised edition), 23; Maria Todorova, “Der Balkan als Analysekategorie:Grenzen, Raum, Zeit,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft: Zeitschrift für histori- sche Sozialwissenschaft 28 (2002): 470-492; Zeitschrift für historische Sozialwissenschaft, 28 (2002), p. 470-492.Maria Todorova, “Historische Vermächtnisse als Analysekategorie. Der Fall Südosteuropa,” in Europa und die Grenzen im Kopf, ed. Karl Kaser, Dagmar Grams- hammer-Hohl, Robert Pichler, Wieser-Enzyklopädie des europäischen Ostens 11 (Klagenfurt – Vienna: Wieser, 2003), 227-252, also online, accessed December 31, 2011, http://wwwg.uni-klu.ac.at/eeo/Todorova_Vermaechtnisse; Todorova, “Spacing Europe: What is a Historical Region?” East Central Europe 32 (1-2) (2005): 59-78; Holm Sundhaussen, “Europa balcanica: Der Balkan als historischer Raum Europas,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft: 190 CHRISTIAN PROMITZER I would add that the historical plausibility of a region might be better under- stood, if we also include all the material interests that are imputed to it. Not to do so would risk that the postmodernist renunciation of primordialism forgets the material base of modern capitalism and how material and in particular eco- nomic interests themselves influenced the construction of historical regions outside capitalist centers of the European continent as regions for possible eco- nomic exploitation.2 To take such a perspective does not imply the desire to reinstate a wholesale, i.e. primordialist, variant of Marxism – and much less Marxism-Leninism – as an integrative worldview, variants of which were for forty years official doctrine in the “socialist” Balkans. The latter have well enough documented that they may serve as examples for a dogmatic philoso- phy and an integrated worldview untainted by the lessons of constructivist epis- temology. My point is that something essential is going to be missed, when the Marxist insistence on material interests for explaining the world is ignored. In doing so, purportedly constructivist approaches risk making themselves the plaything of external interests when they try to formulate new strategies in order to overcome the ascertained general crisis of area studies: The latter (if we leave aside their pendants in the former “socialist” states – as is the case with “Balkan studies” for example in Bulgaria and Serbia) can be considered as conforming to transdisciplinary Western approaches that, due to changing ex- ternal material interests since the end of the Cold War, have lost their raison d'être, and are now trying to find new sources of legitimacy vis-à-vis their fi- nancing and patronizing institutions. As opposed to such a prospective muddling through a general “crisis”, I would, rather, suggest a retrospective approach and examine the underlying ideological foundations and origins of area studies, since these may in part still be the disguised guiding principles of academic research. This, exactly, can be done with respect to various German travelogues from Austrian resp. Austro- Hungarian authors on the Balkans from the 1830 up to 1912 in order to assess the role of the Dual Monarchy in the Western process of “Imagining the Bal- kans.”3 In tracing this phenomenon I will, first, illuminate some aspects of the Zeitschrift für historische Sozialwissenschaft 25 (1999): 626-653; Sundhaussen, “Der Balkan: ein Plädoyer für Differenz,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft: Zeitschrift für historische Sozial- wissenschaft 29 (2003): 642-658; Alex Drace-Francis, “Zur Geschichte des Südosteuropakon- zepts bis 1914,” in Europa und die Grenzen im Kopf, 275-286, also online, accessed Decem- ber 31, 2011, http://wwwg.uni-klu.ac.at/eeo/Drace_Suedosteuropakonzept.pdf; Dietmar Mül- ler, “Southeastern Europe as a historical Meso-region: Constructing Space in Twentieth Century German Historiography,” European Review of History 10 (2) (2003): 393-408. 2 These thoughts are based on a historical model of a Braudelian and/or Wallersteinian devel- opment of modern capitalism that necessarily includes the establishment of “core” and “pe- ripheral” regions. On the Balkans as a “peripheral” region in this sense see Karl Kaser, “Das Abdriften Südosteuropas vom dominierenden europäischen Entwicklungsweg seit dem 11. Jahrhundert,” Balkan Studies 29 (2) (1988): 239-264; Kaser, “Im Schatten der europäischen Weltwirtschaft. Die Verfestigung der Agrarstrukturen und die Peripherisierung Südosteuro- pas,“ in Südosteuropa-Fallstudien: 20 Jahre “Südosteuropäische Geschichte” in Graz, ed. Horst Haselsteiner (Graz: Abteilung für Südosteuropäische Geschichte) 49-81, Kaser, Südost- europäische Geschichte, 98-106.. 3 Maria N. Todorova, Imagining the Balkans (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009/2nd AUSTRIA AND THE BALKANS 191 representation of the Balkans among Austrian elites, and, second, consider Austrian travelogues as a possible source for a wholesale representation of a region. THE BALKANS IN THE MINDS OF AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN AND MODERN AUSTRIAN ELITES With respect to studies of Southeastern Europe in Germany, some preliminary work has been done with respect to their form during National Socialism.4 But for little Austria – and above its mighty imperial predecessor – the respective study of the form that it’s interests in the Balkans took is still ahead of us. In Austria itself, analogies between current and past interests in the region on its southern border are a recurrent phenomenon, especially since the end of the communist regimes in Eastern Central and Southeastern Europe. In the mid- 1980s the Austrian politician Erhard Busek, together with the historian and diplomat Emil Brix, addressed the historical connections between Vienna and the Balkans, specifically links to Serbia and Montenegro. This took place in a general, liberal-conservative discourse on Central Europe (“Mitteleuropa”) and how best to support various local dissidents and dissident groups in their en- deavor to fight and topple their respective communist regimes, which for vari- ous reasons found themselves at that time on the defensive. Such endeavors were supposed to secure Austria, as the core of the former Habsburg Empire, a convenient position as intermediary in the political rollback in East Central Europe.5 A decade later, in 1999, NATO was at war with Serbia and the Euro- pean Union and other Western states launched the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. In this year, Busek published his book “Austria and the Bal- kans.” There the subsequent Special Coordinator of the Stability Pact com- plained that “the average Austrian only has scanty knowledge of Southeastern Europe.” He called for refreshing old links, arguing that: “Around 1900 the city of Vienna was a kind of world capital for a few seconds of global history. It would have never existed without this intellectual background [i.e. of South- eastern Europe – C.P.]. Even today, cultural life in Austria is determined ex- ceedingly by people from Southeastern Europe, as is documented, for example, edition [1997]). 4 Michael Fahlbusch, Wissenschaft im Dienst der nationalsozialistischen Politik? Die “Volks- deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaften” von 1931-1945 (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999); Hel- mut Schaller, Der Nationalsozialismus und die slawische Welt (Regensburg: Pustet, 2002); Mathias Beer, ed., Südostforschung im Schatten des Dritten Reiches: Institutionen, Inhalte, Personen, Südosteuropäische Arbeiten 119 (München: Oldenbourg, 2004);
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE NAME ROUMIANA ILIEVA PRESHLENOVA ADDRESS Institute of Balkan Studies & Centre for Thracology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 45 Moskovska St., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria [email protected]; [email protected] CITIZENSHIP Bulgarian EDUCATION PhD from the Institute of Balkan Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia MA, Department of History and Theory of Culture, Faculty of History, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski MA, Department of German Studies, Faculty of Classical and Modern Philology, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski POSITION Professor at the Institute for Balkan Studies & Centre for Thracology, BAS Director of Institute of Balkan Studies & Centre for Thracology, BAS TEACHING Faculty of History of Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski RESEARCH EXPERIENCE Participant in over 20 international research projects and coordinator of 6 international research projects. Participation with a paper in over 80 international conferences and congresses in Austria, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Turkey, USA. SELECTED RECENT PUBLICATIONS Monographs On the Roads of Europeism. Higher Education in Austria-Hungary and the Bulgarians (1879- 1918) [in Bulgarian]. Paradigma, Sofia 2008. Frontiers Revisited. Identities and Economy in the Balkans in Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries. Saarbrücken, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011. Austria-Hungary and the Balkans 1878-1912 [in Bulgarian]. Sofia, St Kliment Ohridski University Press, 2017. 2 Editorial Österreich, Österreich-Ungarn und die Entwicklung der bulgarischen Eliten, 1815-1918. Verlag der Bulgarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sofia 1999 (with M. Lalkov and H. Heppner). Die Bulgaren und Europa von der Nationalen Wiedergeburt bis zur Gegenwart. Verlag der Bulgarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sofia 1999 (with H.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier Gentlemen's Club: Felix Kanitz and Balkan Archaeology
    10 Frontier gentlemen’s club: Felix Kanitz and Balkan archaeology Vladimir V. Mihajlovic´ Histories of archaeology show that our disciplinary knowledge has immensely diverse origins, in terms of its interactions not just with other fields of scholarly inquiry, but within the field of archaeology itself. Routes of communication exist outside ‘regular’ academic channels and have a great influence on the production and transmission of discipli- nary knowledge. Knowledge that is now perceived as canonical has often been conceived through contacts made outside institutional circles and their strict rules. Archaeological knowledge, as well as scientific knowledge in general, like any other form of knowledge, is ‘a cultural formation, embedded in wider networks of social relations and political power, and shaped by the local environments in which practitioners carry out their tasks’ (Livingstone, 2002: 236; on the social nature of knowledge see Latour, 1996, 2005; Law, 1992). The socio-/geopolitical nature of knowledge that David Livingstone writes about can be clearly seen in the life and work of Felix Kanitz (1829–1904), one of the greatest researchers of the Balkans (and their past) in the nineteenth century. Géza Fehér, the author of the first and still the most compre- hensive biography of Kanitz (1932), gave him the flattering nickname ‘Columbus of the Balkans’. Kanitz was once perceived as the discoverer of the lands south of the Sava-Danube river boundary, and his books are still ‘a veritable mine of rich and scholarly information’ on the Balkans – and Serbia and Bulgaria in particular – hence, ‘no attempt at summarizing this achievement can do it credit’ (Todorova, 2009 [1997]: 71).
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from Vidin: a Study of Ottoman Governmentality and Politics of Local Administration, 1864-1877
    LETTERS FROM VIDIN: A STUDY OF OTTOMAN GOVERNMENTALITY AND POLITICS OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, 1864-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Mehmet Safa Saracoglu ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Carter Vaughn Findley, Adviser Professor Jane Hathaway ______________________ Professor Kenneth Andrien Adviser History Graduate Program Copyright by Mehmet Safa Saracoglu 2007 ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the local administrative practices in Vidin County during 1860s and 1870s. Vidin County, as defined by the Ottoman Provincial Regulation of 1864, is the area that includes the districts of Vidin (the administrative center), ‛Adliye (modern-day Kula), Belgradcık (Belogradchik), Berkofça (Bergovitsa), İvraca (Vratsa), Rahova (Rahovo), and Lom (Lom), all of which are located in modern-day Bulgaria. My focus is mostly on the post-1864 period primarily due to the document utilized for this dissertation: the copy registers of the county administrative council in Vidin. Doing a close reading of these copy registers together with other primary and secondary sources this dissertation analyzes the politics of local administration in Vidin as a case study to understand the Ottoman governmentality in the second half of the nineteenth century. The main thesis of this study contends that the local inhabitants of Vidin effectively used the institutional framework of local administration ii in this period of transformation in order to devise strategies that served their interests. This work distances itself from an understanding of the nineteenth-century local politics as polarized between a dominating local government trying to impose unprecedented reforms designed at the imperial center on the one hand, and an oppressed but nevertheless resistant people, rebelling against the insensitive policies of the state on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magic of Belgrade – a City Where Heritage Meets the Modern1
    The Magic of Belgrade – A City Where Heritage Meets the Modern1 Ljiljana Markovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia Biljana Djoric Francuski, University of Belgrade, Serbia Bosko Francuski, University of Belgrade, Serbia The IAFOR Conference on Heritage & the City – New York 2018 Official Conference Proceedings Abstract The capital of Serbia, Belgrade, is a city with a lengthy history dating back to the seventh millennium BC. In the third century BC the Celts named it Singidunum, whereas since the ninth century AD it has been known as Beligrad, meaning The White City. Strategically located on the crossroad between the Occident and the Orient, between the Pannonian Valley and the Balkans, at the confluence of the Danube and the Sava River, this city, in which heritage meets the modern, is also the meeting point of influences from West and East. The city has been depicted by many authors, both Serbian and foreign, but among these literary works stands out the oeuvre of Momo Kapor, who devoted his whole life to writing about and painting scenes of life in Belgrade. Kapor was well known and successful both as a painter, having exhibited his work in renowned galleries in Serbia and abroad, and as a writer, since his forty-odd novels and short story collections are bestsellers in Serbia and have been translated into dozens of foreign languages. In The Magic of Belgrade, Momo Kapor does not only describe the monuments and people of this beautiful city, he even searches for what he calls ‘the spirit of Belgrade’. The purpose of this paper is to pinpoint such elements of Kapor’s work that capture the spirit of the place by reflecting, on the one hand, its heritage and, on the other, its urban growth which has resulted in its modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • Promitzer, Austria and the Balkans
    Christian Promitzer Austria and the Balkans: Exploring the Role of Travelogues in the Construction of an Area Introduction One of the main purposes of area studies is the virtual construction of those spaces which are nominally granting their existence. This statement does not intend to postulate that the determination of global areas is totally arbitrary (the appellation of certain spaces as “historical regions” is also a matter of plausibility), but it wants to bring to the foreground that a lot of intellectual pain has to be invested, before a “historical” area is coming into being. This is also the case with the volatile region, which according to the respective viewpoint of an author may be called “Southeastern Europe”, “South-East Europe”, or the “Balkans”. During the last two decades Karl Kaser, Maria Todorova, Holm Sundhaussen, Alexis Drace Francis, Dietmar Müller and many others have tried to either deconstruct or reify these areal concepts within the given historical foci of interest since the early 19 th century. Thereby both Todorova’s approach to grasp a region by its common historical legacy and Kaser’s simple, but not simplistic relativization that the respective boundaries of “Southeastern Europe” in the eye of the researcher depend on her or his leading questions, are most convincing. 1 We would add that the historical plausibility of a region could be fully understood, if we also include all kinds of material interests which are imputed to it. Otherwise, the postmodernist renunciation of primordialism would contain the possible danger of forgetfulness about the material base of modern Capitalism and how material and in particular economic interests positioned at this base themselves influenced the construction of historical regions outside Capitalist centers of the European continent as regions for possible economic exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Clusters of Knowledge Julia Roberts and Kathleen Sheppard
    Introduction: clusters of knowledge Julia Roberts and Kathleen Sheppard This edited volume is the first to apply scientific network theories to the history of archaeology. As an innovative approach to historiography it takes its place amongst recent studies that have transformed the disci- pline. Using theories including those of Ludwik Fleck, David Livingstone, Michel Callon and Bruno Latour, the authors of the following chapters have taken an unprecedented approach to their subjects: rather than looking at individuals and groups biographically or institutionally, or accepting that this is simply how archaeology was, these studies look at how networks are formed and how this in turn impacts on how archaeological knowledge is generated and disseminated. This original perspective has yielded novel and surprising insights into the history of archaeology which, we believe, will become the foundation of a new appreciation of the complexity of archaeology’s history. Studies of the histories of archaeology have dramatically increased in recent decades. Prior to Bruce Trigger’s ground-breaking A History of Archaeological Thought in 1989, students had few texts to consult and, of those, many were repetitive, focussing on a few key names, generally ‘great men’ of archaeology credited with being the ‘father’ of whatever archaeology they espoused. The studies had little to offer more rigorous and theoretical archaeologists, particularly those interested in gender, race or class and how those with more marginal status access archae- ology. In this
    [Show full text]
  • Ethno-Confessional Realities in the Romanian Area: Historical Perspectives (XVIII-XX Centuries)
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethno-Confessional Realities in the Romanian Area: Historical Perspectives (XVIII-XX centuries) Brie, Mircea and Şipoş, Sorin and Horga, Ioan University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44026/ MPRA Paper No. 44026, posted 30 Jan 2013 09:17 UTC ETHNO-CONFESSIONAL REALITIES IN THE ROMANIAN AREA: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES (XVIII-XX CENTURIES) ETHNO-CONFESSIONAL REALITIES IN THE ROMANIAN AREA: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES (XVIII-XX CENTURIES) Mircea BRIE Sorin ŞIPOŞ Ioan HORGA (Coordinators) Foreword by Barbu ŞTEFĂNESCU Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border (workshop: Ethno-Confessional Realities in the Romanian Area: Historical Perspectives), held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011. This international conference, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council, was an event run within the project of Action Jean Monnet Programme of the European Commission n. 176197-LLP-1- 2010-1-RO-AJM-MO CONTENTS Barbu ŞTEFĂNESCU Foreword ................................................................................................................ 7 CONFESSION AND CONFESSIONAL MINORITIES Barbu ŞTEFĂNESCU Confessionalisation and Community Sociability (Transylvania, 18th Century – First Half of the
    [Show full text]
  • MZ 1/2016 Kern V11.Indd
    ISSN 0259-7446 EUR 6,50 medienmedien Kommunikation in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart && zeitzeit Topic: The Balkans as the European Inner Otherness Being-with(out) Balkan Between Ethnic and Civic Nationalism Serbia‘s In-Betweenness Europe through the Gaze of the “Illustrirte Zeitung” Anno 1858 New Crisis, Old Perception? Research Corner: The Political Element in Serbian Public Discourse 11/2016/2016 Jahrgang 31 m&z 1/2016 medien & zeit Impressum MEDIENINHABER, HERAUSGEBER UND VERLEGER Verein „Arbeitskreis für historische Kommunikationsforschung Inhalt (AHK)“, Währinger Straße 29, 1090 Wien, ZVR-Zahl 963010743 http://www.medienundzeit.at © Die Rechte für die Beiträge in diesem Heft liegen beim „Arbeitskreis für historische Kommunikationsforschung (AHK)“ Being-with(out) Balkan HERAUSGEBERINNEN Rainer Gries, Christina Krakovsky, Eva Tamara Asboth; Eulogy for the Excess REDAKTION BUCHBESPRECHUNGEN Gaby Falböck, Roland Steiner, Thomas Ballhausen Mirjana Stošić 5 REDAKTION RESEARCH CORNER Rainer Gries LEKTORAT & LAYOUT Between Ethnic and Civic Nationalism Diotima Bertel, Barbara Metzler, Judith Rosenkranz, Catherine Sark; Census and Nation Building in Diotima Bertel, Catherine Sark Bosnia and Herzegovina PROOF READING Charlotte Eckler Anida Sokol 12 PREPRESS Grafikbüro Ebner, Wiengasse 6, 1140 Wien, VERSAND Serbia’s In-Betweenness ÖHTB – Österreichisches Hilfswerk für Taubblinde und hochgradig Hör- und Sehbehinderte The Interplay of Balkanism, Europeanness Werkstätte Humboldtplatz 7, 1100 Wien, ERSCHEINUNGSWEISE & BEZUGSBEDINGUNGEN and Disappointed Expectations in Serbia’s medien & zeit erscheint vierteljährlich gedruckt und digital. EU Integration Process Heftbestellungen: Einzelheft (exkl. Versand): 6,50 Euro Silvia Nadjivan 23 Jahresabonnement: Österreich (inkl. Versand): 22,00 Euro Ausland (inkl. Versand auf dem Landweg): 30,00 Euro Jahresabonnement für StudentInnen: Europe through the Gaze of the Österreich (inkl.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich S. Krauss and Alois Riegl, Social Network Formation in Viennese Ethnography, 1883-1895
    FRIEDRICH S. KRAUSS AND ALOIS RIEGL, SOCIAL NETWORK FORMATION IN VIENNESE ETHNOGRAPHY, 1883-1895 A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Lawrence M. Shapiro May 2015 © 2015 Lawrence M. Shapiro FRIEDRICH S. KRAUSS AND ALOIS RIEGL, SOCIAL NETWORK FORMATION IN VIENNESE ETHNOGRAPHY, 1883-1895 Lawrence M. Shapiro, Ph.D. Cornell University 2015 ABSTRACT This project sets out to articulate the faint indicators of connectedness and relatedness between Alois Riegl (1858-1905) and Friedrich S. Krauss (1859-1938). Both were central to moments of intensified activity and institutional formation in 1883/84 and 1894/95, respectively the formation of the Ethnographische Commission within the Anthropologische Gesellschaft Wien (AGW) in 1883/84 and the mobilization in support of the Verein für österreichische Volkskunde (VöV) in 1894/95. Both entities responded to the crises of the Nationalities Problem in Austria, which included the rapid growth of modern anti-Semitism after 1880. Volkskunde in Germany was predominantly nostalgic, bourgeoise, and anti-modern, more like folklore studies than like cultural anthropology, under the influence of Wilhelm Heinrich Riehl. Austrian liberal Volkskunde followed the Enlightenment ideals of Alexander von Humboldt and his study of Volksgeist (spirit of the people), as articulation of the infinite, plastic variability of subjectivity. Moritz Lazarus and Chaim Steinthal advanced, in the period 1860-1890, Humboldt’s proposition for a liberal Völkerpsychologie, (ethno-psychology) to normalize ethnic difference, including the legitimacy of the Jews as citizens of a civic rather than ethnic nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Récits De Voyages Dans L'orient Européen
    Récits de voyages dans l’Orient européen, De la Valachie, de la Moldavie et de la Transylvanie à la Roumanie (1780-1921) en allemand, anglais, français, italien, accompagné d’un Choix concernant la Bulgarie et de Sources complémentaires : récits de séjour, mémoires et souvenirs, lettres, études historiques, géographiques, politiques, sociales, guides Essai de bibliographie descriptive, par Daniel Lançon, mars 2020, UMR Litt&arts, Université Grenoble Alpes Note introductive Cette bibliographie rassemble des récits personnels, témoignages d’une expérience viatique ou de séjour : voyages d’agrément (touristiques) ; voyages d’étude géologiques, géographiques, religieux, politiques, anthropologiques, ethnologiques … (commandés par des institutions publiques ou privées)1 ; voyages de correspondants de guerre (1806-12 ; 1828 ; 1854-56 ; 1877-78) ; souvenirs et mémoires de voyageurs/voyageuses et de résidents ou résidentes (épouses ou filles de diplomates) ; récits de séjour d’enseignants, de journalistes, de diplomates, de précepteurs/secrétaires des Princes régnants ; lettres de voyage. Ont été ajoutées les références de dessins et gravures publiés par des artistes en voyage2. La longue durée retenue s’ouvre par l’entrée dans l’ère des premières modernités sociales et politiques, accompagnées de l’augmentation importante des récits de séjour dans les années 17803, et se clôt au moment de la naissance des États-nations roumains et bulgares, la première guerre mondiale et la disparition des provinces de « Turquie d’Europe » de l’Empire ottoman, entre 1913 et 1919. 1 Voyages savants (Wissenschaftliche Reise) ou de recherche (Forschungsreise). Ils figurent en plus petits caractères, en retrait. 2 Peu de récits émanent d’écrivains de vocation, devenus célèbres ou non (Loti, Andersen, About…).
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Todorova, Imagining the Balkans.Pdf
    Preface Imagining the Balkans This page intentionally left blank Imagining the Balkans Updated Edition Maria Todorova 1 2009 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With Offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Todorova, Maria Nikolaeva. Imagining the Balkans / Maria Todorova.—updated ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0-19-538786-5 1. Balkan Peninsula—Historiography. I. title. DR34.T63 1997 96-7161 949.6—dc20 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To my parents, from whom I learned to love the Balkans without the need to be proud or ashamed of them. This page intentionally left blank Preface The hope of an intellectual is not that he will have an effect on the world, but that someday, somewhere, someone will read what he wrote exactly as he wrote it.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publikation
    Bulgarisch - Österreichisches Kolloquium . Kittseer Herbstgespräche Europäische Ethnologie an der Wende Aufgaben Perspektiven Kooperationen KITTSEER SCHRIFTEN ZUR VOLKSKUNDE VERÖFFENTLICHUNGEN DES ETHNOGRAPHISCHEN MUSEUMS SCHLOSS KITTSEE Herausgegeben von Klaus Beitl Heft 12 1. Kittseer Herbstgespräche Bulgarisch-österreichisches Kolloquium Bisher erschienen: Heft 1 Klara K. Csillery DIE BAUERNMÖBEL VON HARTA. Erläuterungen zur Möbelstube der Ungarn-Deutschen in der Sammlung des Ethnographischen Museums Schloß Kittsee. 1981 Heft 2 Klaus Beitl (Hg.) VERGLEICHENDE KERAMIKFORSCHUNG IN MITTEL- UND OSTEUROPA. Referate des 14. Internationalen Hafnerei-Symposiums vom 7.-11. September 1981 im EMK. 1984 Heft 3 Klaus Beitl (Hg.) ALBANIEN-SYMPOSIUM 1984. Referate der Tagung „Albanien. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Volkskunde, Geschichte und Sozialgeschichte“ am 22. und 23. November 1984 im EMK. 1986 Heft 4 Klaus Beitl (Hg.) KROATEN-TAG 1985. Referate des „Kroaten-Tages“/„Dan kulture Gradiscanskih Hrvatov“ am 28. April 1995 im EMK. 1986 Heft 5 Emil Schneeweis und Felix Schneeweis VON DALMATINISCHEN BILDSTÖCKEN UND WALDVIERTLER GLOCKENTÜRMEN. Zwei Beiträge zur Flurdenkmalforschung. 1988 Heft 6 Petar Namicev LÄNDLICHE ARCHITEKTUR IN MAZEDONIEN. Mit 60 Zeichnungen des Verfassers. 1996 Heft 7 Barbara Tobler (Bearb.) DIE MÄHRISCHEN KROATEN. Bilder von Othmar Ruzicka. Mit Beiträgen von Dragutin Pavlicevic und Anto Nadj. 1996 Heft 8 Margit Krpata und Maximilian Wilding (Red.) DAS BLATT IM MEER - ZYPERN IN ÖSTERREICHISCHEN SAMMLUNGEN. 1997 Heft 9 Veronika Plöckinger, Matthias Beitl und Ulrich Göttke-Krogmann (Hg.) GALIZIEN. Ethnographische Erkundung bei den Bojken und Huzulen in den Karpaten. 1998 Heft 10 Veronika Plöckinger und Matthias Beitl (Hg.) ZWISCHEN DEM SICHTBAREN UND DEM UNSICHTBAREN. Historische Kalenderbräuche aus Bulgarien Eine Ausstellung des Ethnographischen Instituts mit Museum der Bulgarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften im Rahmen von EFMO (Ethnologie-Forum Mittel- und Osteuropa) Begleitbuch zur gleichnamigen Jahresausstellung vom 20.
    [Show full text]