DOCSLIB.ORG

8627/09 EXT 1 PH/Jm DGC 1C Delegations Will Find Attached The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8627/09 EXT 1 PH/Jm DGC 1C Delegations Will Find Attached The Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 June 2015 8627/09 EXT 1 COPS 204 PESC 474 CIVCOM 245 COSDP 324 COWEB 71 EUPM 20 PARTIAL DECLASSIFICATION of document: 8627/09 RESTREINT UE dated: 8 April 2009 new status: Public Subject: European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina Monthly Assessment report for the month of March 2009 Delegations will find attached the partially declassified version of the above-mentioned document. ________________________ 8627/09 EXT 1 PH/jm DGC 1C EN ANNEX COUNCIL OF Brussels, 8 April 2009 THE EUROPEAN UNION 8627/09 EXT 1 (18.06.2015) RESTREINT UE COPS 204 PESC 474 CIVCOM 245 COSDP 324 COWEB 71 EUPM 20 NOTE From Secretariat To Political and Security Committee Third States contributing to EUPM Subject : European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina Monthly Assessment report for the month of March 2009 Delegations will find attached the EUPM Monthly Assessment report for the month of March 2009. ____________________ 8627/09 EXT 1 MS/ts 1 ANNEX CPCC EN EUROPEAN UNION POLICE MISSION Analysis and Reporting Cell EUPM Headquarters Monthly Assessment Report 3/09 PO BOX 90 Aleja Bosne Srebrene bb 1- 31 March 2009 71000 – SARAJEVO (BiH) Tel: +387 (0) 33 752 685 Fax: +387 (0) 33 752 734 Email: [email protected] Executive Summary On 11 March SIPA conducted an operation in Sarajevo (Canton 9) and arrested eight persons suspected of being involved in an international drug trafficking ring. On 24 March SIPA officers arrested three persons in Bijeljina area, suspected of being involved in the case of abuse and misuse of computerized CIPS (Citizens Identification Protection System) ID cards and passports system, including document forgeries provided to persons indicted for war crimes. On 10 March, a prison break occurred from the Ustikolina prison during which two prison guards were disarmed and nine inmates escaped. Local police in Foca conducted a successful search and arrest operation involving 13 Albanian illegal migrants and 3 Bosnian facilitators. On 13 March 2009, following the HR decision to repeal a previous order, travel documents were returned to certain individuals who were allegedly involved in war crimes in Srebrenica in 1995 and were named on the so called ‘Srebrenica List’. Amendment I to the BiH Constitution over the status of Brcko District adopted by BiH Parliamentary Assembly (PA). At the Peace Implementation Council (PIC) Steering Broad in Sarajevo on 25 and 26 March the continuation of OHR and the maintenance of the HR with all prerogatives were confirmed. On March 26th, Mr. Valentin Inzko was appointed new High Representative and new EUSR by the Peace Implementation Council. The 122 Vasa policija public 8627/09 EXT 1 MS/ts 2 ANNEX CPCC EN information campaign, launched on 13 February in cooperation with the BiH law enforcement agencies, reached a peak of activities throughout March. On 18 March, PS Trebinje received a report that a journalist from Banja Luka was verbally assaulted by unknown individuals nearby the Orthodox Cathedral whilst taking footage for reportage. BiH experienced 2 earthquakes during the day of 30 March and the night of 30/31 March, (no damage to EUPM property or person occurred). Comments by Head of Mission March saw important events, including key activities with regard to police and the European agenda. The Minister of Security, Tarik Sadovic hosted a visit of the Director of Europol on 2 March 2009. The aim of the visit was to promote full implementation of the Strategic Agreement with Europol and brought together ministerial and police officials from all competent authorities dealing with Europol. The Europol Director paid a half-day visit to EUPM where he was informed about the implementation of the ESDP-EUROPOL technical agreement on exchange of information. We also discussed how to support the deployment of police liaison officers from Bosnia and Herzegovina to Europol. In parallel to this visit several teams of member states’ experts visited Bosnia and Herzegovina to assess progress with regard to the Visa Liberalisation Road Map. EUPM contributed to this work through briefings by mission members. The mission continued its activities in line with its mandate and conducted a first video conference with the new Head of Operations of the CPCC, 16 March. On 17 March, the Operational Commander EUFOR and DSACEUR, Gen. Sir McColl, paid a visit to EUPM during his assessment visit in preparation for the upcoming SMR (Six Monthly Review) of EUFOR Althea. The Political Directors of the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board met in Sarajevo 25/26 March. The meeting was chaired by the outgoing High Representative in the presence of the incoming, Dr Valentin Inzko. As a member of the Board of PrincipaIs, HoM participated in all meetings. 8627/09 EXT 1 MS/ts 3 ANNEX CPCC EN The mission’s activities were focused on the stabilization of SIPA following the submission of a SIPA report on investigating high-level corruption and abuse of office to the State Prosecutors Office. The media battle among politicians and key SIPA managers continued. The problems which were exposed to the public and other institutions did contribute to a feeling of uncertainty about the direction the country would take. On 26 and 27 March, the three Directors of State-level law enforcement agencies, the State Prosecutor, the Directors of Federation and RS Police and the Chief of Brcko District Police and one representative of the cantonal Police Commissioners met, following the invitation of Mr Dragan Mektic, the Director of the Service for Foreigners’ Affairs. The meeting provided an important opportunity for HoM to refocus the joint work with Directors of LEA on the achievement of joint objectives. 27 March, the seventh six monthly review was submitted to the Civilian Operations Commander for consideration and circulation to member states. I concluded March with a debriefing session on 31 March between Minister of Security Tadovic and myself on EUPM priorities and recommendations for the upcoming period and my intent for the briefing of EU Member States on 3 April (PSC, Brussels). Mandate Implementation Support in the Fight against Organised Crime SIPA operation targeting International drug ring - On 11 March, following a long term investigation and based upon an order issued by the BiH State Prosecutor’s Office, SIPA conducted an operation in Sarajevo (Canton 9) and arrested eight persons suspected of being involved in an international drug trafficking ring. During the operation, several locations were searched. Prior to this operation, FMoI officers arrested one person in Sarajevo and two in Zenica (Canton 4) as a part of this investigation. In total 3 kg of suspected heroin were seized, as well as a significant amount of money in various currencies, two firearms, mobile phones and vehicles. EUPM was involved from the initial phase of the investigation and was deployed in the field, and noted that the 8627/09 EXT 1 MS/ts 4 ANNEX CPCC EN co-operation between SIPA and FMoI was excellent and should be an example of how to share information and how to cooperate successfully. The investigation is continuing and EUPM will monitor. SIPA arrests in relation to CIPS case - On 24 March, based on an order issued by the State Prosecutor’s Office, SIPA officers arrested three persons in Bijeljina area, suspected of being involved in the case of abuse and misuse of computerized CIPS (Citizens Identification Protection System) ID cards and passports system, including document forgeries provided to persons indicted for war crimes. Two of the arrestees are senior police officials, PSC Bijeljina Chief of uniform police and PS Janja Assistant to Commander. The two are also under investigation pertaining to misuse of power. SIPA searched their private accommodations, offices and vehicles. EUPM teams were deployed in the field to monitor the operation which passed without incidents. The operation was professionally and properly carried out by SIPA and conducted with assistance and full cooperation of Chief of PSC Bijeljina. Background: On 28 May 2008, following a long-term investigation undertaken by the State Prosecutor’s Office, SIPA, Brcko District and RS MoI officers executed 26 search warrants in Banja Luka, Brcko and Bijeljina. During the operation, 20 persons were arrested and four CIPS offices have been searched. The investigation uncovered evidence that the illegally obtained cards, possibly numbering hundreds, have been used as part of criminal activities in BiH (See MAR 05/08). Joint Meeting of Law Enforcement Agencies from Northeast of BiH - An important meeting was held at the Canton 3 MoI (Tuzla) between all the major Police Chiefs/Directors of Northeast Bosnia and Herzegovina. Issues of future cooperation and strategies to combat organized crime were discussed, the meeting was productive in terms of mutual cooperation. This initiative is the first one in recent years, which has been organized in the Tuzla region. EUPM monitored, supported and encouraged this event since the early stages of the planning. It was agreed that these kinds of meetings will continue in the future and that the next agenda should contain specific crime topics. It is likely that the next joint meeting will take place in Brcko District in April. EUPM will monitor, follow and be actively involved. 8627/09 EXT 1 MS/ts 5 ANNEX CPCC EN Criminal Justice BiH Constitutional Court confirmed the constitutionality of Article 13(2) of the Law on BiH Court - The BiH Constitutional court at its sessions on 27 and 28 of March, discussed and confirmed the constitutionality of the Article 13(2) of the Law on BiH Court that establishes the criminal jurisdiction of the BiH Court including its jurisdiction under certain circumstances over crimes prescribed in the entity laws. The decision was long expected and accompanied by vivid discussions at the political level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Balkans | 65
    westeRn BalKans | 65 3.4 Mission Reviews Western Balkans he Western Balkans have been a testing-ground Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and Kosovo. T for a huge range of political missions since the Each of these figures also has responsibility for early 1990s. These have ranged from light-weight some sort of field presence, although these are civilian monitoring missions meant to help contain not straightforward European political missions. the Yugoslav wars to long-serving presences tasked The EUSR in BiH also serves as the Interna- with promoting good governance, fair elections, tional High Representative, answering to a Peace minority rights and economic rehabilitation. Implementation Council of fifty-five countries and These long-term presences were usually organizations.1 The EUSR in Kosovo is similarly deployed to support or replace peacekeepers. double-hatted as the International Civilian Repre- The large military forces that stabilized the region sentative (ICR, answering to a Steering Group of have now downsized, while some international 28 countries that recognize Kosovo’s sovereignty). civilian missions are likely to remain in place for a The EUSR in FYROM has also acted as the head considerable time. of the European Commission’s delegation there Today, two organizations have prominent since late 2005. political missions in the Balkans. The Organization In addition to the OSCE and EU, the UN has for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) a residual presence in the Western Balkans. The maintains field presences in Albania and all the for- UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo mer constituent parts of Yugoslavia except Slovenia (UNMIK), having had executive authority and a (its presence in Croatia, however, is now an office in large civilian police arm from 1999 to 2008, has an Zagreb and will not be discussed here).
    [Show full text]
  • The High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina
    February 2021 KAS Office in Bosnia and Herzegovina ''Future as a duty'' – the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina Sven Petke, Suljo Ćorsulić A new High Representative will assume office in Bosnia and Herzegovina over the coming months. Valentin Inzko, an Austrian, has been holding this position since 2009. He made repeated efforts to maintain a diplomatic and fair relationship with the key political actors in Bosnia and Herzegovina. An important pre-requisite for the work of a High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina includes vast political experience and support by the international community. An important step for the second pre-requisite has been made with the inauguration of the US President Joe Biden: It is expected that the United States of America and the European Union will again closely coordinate their political engagement in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the neighbouring countries. Office of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina (OHR) The citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina have lived in peace for more than 25 years. Bosnia and Herzegovina consists of two entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska. Bosnia and Herzegovina gained independence following an independence referendum in 1992 after the disintegration of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Bosnian Croats, Bosnian Serbs and Bosniaks were the belligerent parties in the ensuing war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. After a four-year war with over 100,000 dead, hundreds of thousands of wounded and millions of refugees, the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement was facilitated by the international community. The Peace Agreement ended the war and guaranteed the sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia: Current Issues and U.S
    Bosnia: Current Issues and U.S. Policy Steven Woehrel Specialist in European Affairs August 27, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40479 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Bosnia: Current Issues and U.S. Policy Summary In recent years, many analysts have expressed concern that the international community’s efforts since 1995 to stabilize Bosnia are beginning to come apart. They noted that the downward trend has been especially evident since 2006, with the election of leaders with starkly divergent goals. Milorad Dodik, Prime Minister of the Republika Srpska (RS), one of the two semi-autonomous “entities” within Bosnia, has obstructed efforts to make Bosnia’s central government more effective and has at times asserted the RS’s right to secede from Bosnia. On the other hand, Haris Silajdzic, a member of the central government collective presidency from the Bosniak ethnic group, has condemned the Republika Srpska as an illegitimate product of genocide. He has called for the abolition of the entities and a dominant central government. Efforts to reform Bosnia’s constitution have made little progress. There has been a debate about the future role of the international community in Bosnia. The Office of the High Representative (OHR), chosen by leading countries and international institutions, oversees implementation of the Dayton Peace Accords, which ended the 1992-1995 war in Bosnia. An EU peacekeeping force, called EUFOR, is charged with keeping the peace in Bosnia and overseeing the Bosnian armed forces. The international community has vowed to close OHR after Bosnia meets a series of reform objectives, ending direct international oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Summer of 2011
    The Balkan Summer of 2011 by Michael Haltzel, Senior Fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations “Turning point” has become somewhat of a cliché as a description of where a country or a region stands at a point in time. The ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said “you cannot step twice into the same stream” and, to be sure, life is the story of constant change and turns. Nonetheless, individuals and countries are occasionally confronted with choices so important that the course taken will likely determine subsequent events for years, even decades. Several of the countries of the Western Balkans face these kinds of decision in the summer of 2011, as does the European Union, and to some extent, the United States. First, the exceptions. Slovenia, in the northwestern corner of the region, is solidly entrenched in NATO and the European Union. Once the most economically developed republic in the old Yugoslavia, it has retained that regional distinction twenty years into independence. Although the global financial and economic crisis has hit Slovenia hard, it is a member of the euro zone, and it continues to participate in Balkan peacekeeping and in the NATO operation in Afghanistan. In its vibrant democracy, which has seen orderly electoral changes of administrations, Slovenia’s populace has no hesitation about expressing discontent. In short, stable Slovenia is one of the success-stories of post-communist Europe. As it struggles to overcome its current economic difficulties, Ljubljana would not seem to be facing fundamental challenges. Slovenia’s neighbor Croatia is also on a positive path. Unlike Slovenia, however, after the break-up of Yugoslavia, Croatia did not immediately embark upon a democratic course, voting instead for a semi-authoritarian HDZ government under its first President Franjo Tudjman, himself an actor in Yugoslavia’s demise.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction “As I have said time and again, my job is to get rid of my job. I am quite clear that the OHR is now into the terminal phase of its mandate”, said then High Representative for the international community in BIH Paddy Ashdown in his speech in front of the Venice Commission1 in October 2004. For over eight years now the international community has been discussing the downscale of its presence in Bosnia and Herzegovina2, which since the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement in 1995 has been run as a virtual protectorate. But not much has changed since Ashdown’s speech. Although the country has gone forward in all fields and the security situation has improved drastically since 1995, with the number of NATO peacekeeping forces decreasing from 60,000 to only 1,6003 and with BIH currently a temporary member of the UN Security Council, no arrangements have been made to grant more sovereignty to local politics. And due to recent negative developments in politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the prospect of getting rid of the ‘informal trusteeship’ now seems more distant than it was at the time of Ashdown’s speech. The OHR, acronym for Office of the High Representative, is the international body responsible for overseeing the implementation of the civilian aspects of the treaty which ended the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is governed by a council of 55 countries and international organizations charged with overseeing Bosnia’s reconstruction, formally organized into an umbrella organization called the Peace Implementation Council (PIC). It is the PIC who 1The European Commission for Democracy through Law, better known as the Venice Commission, is the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Rituals and Discourses: the Case of Carinthia
    doi:10.7592/FEJF2015.60.fikfak POLITICAL RITUALS AND DISCOURSES: THE CASE OF CARINTHIA Jurij Fikfak Abstract: This article discusses selected ritual practices in Klagenfurt (Sln. Celovec), the capital of the southernmost Austrian state of Carinthia (Germ. Kärnten). The first ritual is connected with October 10, when the 1920 plebiscite is commemorated on the streets of Klagenfurt. In this plebiscite, the majority of people voted for remaining a part of Austria, the successor state to Austria-Hun- gary. The second ritual is a more recent one, known as the Memorial Walk (Germ. Gedenkgehen, Sln. Spominska hoja). Various cultural practices are analysed, as well as the use of symbols and space, media, state, and national discourses. Keywords: alternative practice, memorial walk, Nazism, plebiscite, ritual prac- tices, use of discourse Political rituals are practices set in concrete chronotopes. They express and materialise a sense of belonging, the formation of identities, and the establishment of local, regional, ethnic, national, or state entities. They also represent an area of social cohesion, self-identification, the marking of social affiliation and the exclusion of the Other. Political rituals are unavoidable in social integration (Lukes 1975), socialisation of hierarchies, relations, and the use of power. They are used repeatedly, year after year, to define, embody, and materialise ethnic, language, and other barriers which do not allow a single person, socialised in any community, to remain unaffected or undecided. As Steven Lukes has put it, political rituals mobilise bias, but they also raise questions about the relationships between different discourses, for example, between the official political discourse of the ruling parties, media discourses, the so-called common sense discourse, and the subcultural discourse present mainly among various extremist groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina by Dino Jahic´
    Bosnia-Herzegovina by Dino Jahic´ Capital: Sarajevo Population: 3.8 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$9,650 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 3.25 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Independent Media 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 National Democratic Governance 4.75 4.75 4.75 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.75 Local Democratic Governance 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 Corruption 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.75 Democracy Score 4.18 4.07 4.04 4.11 4.18 4.25 4.32 4.36 4.39 4.43 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 30 June 2021
    United Nations S/2021/597 Security Council Distr.: General 30 June 2021 Original: English Letter dated 24 June 2021 from the Permanent Representative of Germany to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to transmit herewith a letter dated 3 June 2021 addressed to the Secretary-General from Valentin Inzko, High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, announcing the appointment of his successor, Christian Schmidt, by the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board (see annex). I should be grateful if the present letter and its annex were brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Christoph Heusgen 21-08905 (E) 060721 *2108905* S/2021/597 Annex to the letter dated 24 June 2021 from the Permanent Representative of Germany to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council I am writing to inform you that the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board has decided to appoint former Federal Minister Christian Schmidt of the Federal Republic of Germany as the next High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mr. Schmidt will take up his duties as the High Representative on 1 August 2021, upon which my resignation will become effective. The Peace Implementation Council Steering Board has asked me to inform you of this appointment. The transfer of duties between Mr. Schmidt and I is planned for 1 August 2021. Mr. Christian Schmidt is a German politician, with vast experience and knowledge on Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as the wider region.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Bosnia and Herzegovina: Democracy Promotion Within the Limits of the ‘Ethnic Conflict’ Paradigm
    EARLY DRAFT – DO NOT QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION The EU and Bosnia and Herzegovina: Democracy promotion within the limits of the ‘ethnic conflict’ paradigm Paper presented at the EUSA Biennial International Conference, Boston, 3-5 March 2011 Panel 2I: ‘Does one size fit all? The substance of EU democracy promotion’ Abstract Seeking to contribute to the emerging debate about the substance of EU democracy promotion policies, this paper takes as its focus Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the EU‟s current democracy promotion efforts are primarily focused on reform of the country‟s constitution. Bosnia‟s current constitution, established by the 1995 Dayton Agreement, provides for consociational power- sharing and extensive territorial decentralisation. While EU officials have stressed the inadequacies of the present constitutional arrangements, over time the reforms demanded have become more limited in scope. As such, I suggest that the outcome of any successful constitutional reform negotiations will be technical fixes to the present constitution, allowing the country to meet the obligations of future EU membership, rather than its wholesale redesign. Rather than promoting liberal democracy as it has elsewhere, then, in Bosnia the EU supports the perpetuation of consociational structures, which EU officials regard as the most realistic option given the country‟s post-conflict political context. Faced with the lack of a constitutional norm within the Union, let alone a consociational one, EU policy-makers have instead chosen to refer to a particular reading of the history of the European integration project itself in order to lend support to their approach in Bosnia, which continues to privilege group over individual rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speeches of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina: Cosmopolitanism in Practice?
    The speeches of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina: cosmopolitanism in practice? By: Emma E.M. de Leeuw 3495612, University Utrecht, Languages and cultures (TCS), OZS III Cosmopolitanism, Supervisor: Marijke Huisman, Word count: 8284, Date/Place: Sarajevo, 29-7-1016 The speeches of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina: cosmopolitanism in practice? “I believe in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and I believe in you. But what really matters is that you believe in yourselves.” [Ashdown, Paddy. 2003] This thesis was written in honour of all the people inside and outside Bosnia and Herzegovina who work hard to provide people in Bosnia and Herzegovina with a better future. In that light I would like to thank some people and organisations that assisted me in getting to know the country Bosnia and Herzegovina and its people: First of all, the Dutch Young Democrats in cooperation with Mladi Liberali who introduced me to Bosnia and Herzegovina, secondly ‘The Erasmus + EVS program’ and the Centre for Conflict Studies and Human rights of the University of Utrecht who provided me with a deeper knowledge and more understanding of Bosnia and Herzegovina and its conflicts. Last, but most importantly, all my friends and family in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in the Netherlands who always supported me and helped me to reflect on all the new experiences and knowledge. Picture front page: Sarajevo today By: Emma de Leeuw (April 2016) 1 The speeches of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina: cosmopolitanism in practice? Summary This paper tries to answer the question how the High Representative (HR) for Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) expressed cosmopolitan notions in his public speeches between 1995 and 2015 and what changes in these expressions can be seen after the general elections of 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is an Accepted Manuscript of an Article Published by Taylor
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Journal of Intervention and Statebuidling on 22 July 2016, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17502977.2016.1208992 Deconstructing Dayton: Ethnic politics and the legacy of war in Bosnia and Herzegovina Patrick Pinkerton Abstract Twenty years after the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) which brought the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) to an end, the dysfunctional nature of the Bosnian state means that the question of how political actors in BiH engage with the DPA as a response to the war remains vitally important. This article argues that moving beyond the ethnicisation of politics in BiH enacted by the DPA can be achieved by challenging the understandings of the war which informs the DPA while simultaneously challenging the effects of these understandings in the present. By advancing what I term a ‘deconstructive conclusion’ of the DPA, this article demonstrates the practical utility of Jacques Derrida’s thought for engaging with the legacy of war in BiH. Keywords: Derrida; supplement; Dayton Peace Accords; Balkans; February 2014 protests. Word Count: 8, 351 Introduction The twentieth anniversary in late 2015 of the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords (DPA), which brought the devastating war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) to an end, was the occasion for numerous high-profile commemorative and reflective events, in BiH, Dayton, Ohio and elsewhere. The anniversary of the DPA, which was negotiated between Slobodan Milošević, Alija Izetbegović and Franjo Tuđman, the Presidents of Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, BiH and Croatia respectively, and delegates from the USA, UK, France, Germany, Russia and the EU, also prompted calls from analysts to revisit the DPA in the search for solutions to contemporary conflicts such as the ongoing war in Syria (Stavridis, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Enacting the Law on Amendments to the Law on Citizenship of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Decision Enacting the Law on Amendments to the Law on Citizenship of Bosnia and Herzegovina In the exercise of the powers vested in the High Representative by Article V of Annex 10 (Agreement on Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement) to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which the High Representative is the final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the said Agreement on the Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement; and considering in particular Article II.1. (d) of the last said Agreement, according to the terms of which the High Representative shall "[F]acilitate, as the High Representative judges necessary, the resolution of any difficulties arising in connection with civilian implementation"; Recalling paragraph XI.2 of the Conclusions of the Peace Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997, in which the Peace Implementation Council welcomed the High Representative's intention to use his final authority in theatre regarding interpretation of the Agreement on the Civilian Implementation of the Peace Settlement in order to facilitate the resolution of any difficulties as aforesaid "by making binding decisions, as he judges necessary" on certain issues including, under sub-paragraph (c) thereof, "measures to ensure implementation of the Peace Agreement throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina and its Entities"; Mindful of the fact that the peace implementation process, which continues to be pursued under the aegis of the General Framework Agreement
    [Show full text]