DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 11: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 11: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment PORTISHEAD BRANCH LI NE PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMAT I O N R E P O R T V O L U M E 2 CHAPTER 11 Landscape and Visual Impacts Assessment Table of Contents Section Page 11 Landscape and Visual Impacts Assessment .................................................................. 11-1 11.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 11-1 11.2 Legislation and Policy Framework ........................................................................... 11-2 11.3 Methodology............................................................................................................ 11-5 11.4 Baseline, Future Conditions and Value of Resource .............................................. 11-14 11.5 Measures Adopted as Part of the DCO Scheme .................................................... 11-37 11.6 Assessment of Landscape Effects .......................................................................... 11-37 11.7 Assessment of Visual Effects .................................................................................. 11-52 11.8 Mitigation and Residual Effects ............................................................................. 11-56 11.9 Cumulative Effects ................................................................................................. 11-57 11.10 Limitations Encountered in Compiling the PEI Report........................................... 11-58 11.11 Summary ................................................................................................................ 11-58 11.12 References ............................................................................................................. 11-67 11.13 Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 11-67 Tables Table 11-1: Summary of relevant NPSNN advice on landscape and visual impact assessment Table 11-2: Summary of local policy on landscape and views Table 11-3: Summary of consultation responses Table 11-4: Landscape character value Table 11-5: Sensitivity of visual receptors and typical descriptors Table 11-6: Magnitude of impact for landscape character effects Table 11-7: Magnitude of visual impact and typical descriptors Table 11-8: Significance of landscape effects Table 11-9: Significance of visual effects Table 11-10: Designations relevant to the DCO Scheme Table 11-11: Listed buildings relevant to the DCO Scheme Table 11-12: Registered parks and gardens relevant to the DCO Scheme Table 11-13: Scheduled monuments relevant to the DCO Scheme Table 11-14: Effects on the setting of listed buildings Table 11-15: Effects on the setting of registered parks and gardens Table 11-16: Effects on the setting of scheduled monuments Table 11-17: Potential impacts, mitigation and residual Impacts for the DCO Scheme on landscape and views Figures See Volume 3, Book of Figures: Figure 11-1: Landscape baseline plan Figure 11-2: Indicative site specific landscape character areas Figure 11-3 Visual envelop and receptors Appendices See Volume 4, Appendices: Appendix 11.1 General views Appendix 11.2 General summer and winter views Appendix 11.3 Visual effects PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY CHAPTER 11 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 11 11 Landscape and Visual Impacts Assessment 11.1 Introduction The Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) Development Consent Order Scheme (“the DCO Scheme”) has the potential to give rise to significant landscape and visual effects. This Chapter: describes the relevant legal and policy framework which has informed the undertaking of the assessment; describes the methodology used for the identification and assessment of likely significant landscape and visual impacts effects in this Preliminary Environmental Information Report ("PEI Report"); describes the landscape and visual baseline having regard to existing information; describes the measures that have been adopted as part of the DCO Scheme; identifies and assesses the likely significant effects that could result from the DCO Scheme during construction, operation and decommissioning phases; considers mitigation of likely significant effects and assesses residual effects; considers the cumulative effects of other developments in combination with the DCO Scheme on landscape and visual receptors; identifies the limitations encountered in compiling this PEI Report; and provides a summary of the residual effects for the mitigated DCO Scheme. Landscape character and visual impact assessments are separate, but related topics. The landscape character assessment relates to changes to the elements, features and patterns which together make up the landscape character. The visual assessment relates to the change in the view from particular locations referred to as the visual receptors. The process of landscape and visual impact assessment (“LVIA”) involves developing an understanding of both the existing landscape and visual resources in relation to the DCO Scheme, and then assessing the impact of the DCO Scheme on these resources. Mitigation measures are proposed and included as part of the design where required. The landscape character has been assessed through consideration of nationally and locally designated landscapes and their features, as well as site specific qualities. An understanding of the visual impact has been developed by preparing an approximate visual envelope of the DCO Scheme, and assessing the magnitude of the change in views from selected viewpoints within that visual envelope where those viewpoints are considered to undergo a significant change in view The cumulative effects consider the impact of other development in the vicinity of the DCO Scheme, as well as the construction and operation of the proposed works required for MetroWest Phase 1 comprising the modifications to Parson Street Junction where the DCO Scheme will join the south west main line between Bristol and Taunton, Parson Street Station, the Bedminster Down Relief Line and Severn Beach / Avonmouth Signalling in the Bristol area, and the Bathampton Turnback, which is located near the outskirts of Bath. 11-1 CHAPTER 11 PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Chapter 4 Description of the Proposed Works and Chapter 8 Cultural Heritage with regards to the impact of the DCO Scheme on the setting of heritage features. 11.2 Legislation and Policy Framework National Policy National Policy Statement for National Networks The National Policy Statement for National Networks ("NPSNN") advises on the assessment of landscape and visual impacts for nationally significant infrastructure projects (“NSIP”) for national networks including railways at paragraphs 5.143 to 5.161. Applicants should undertake an assessment of any likely significant landscape and visual impact assessments and describe these in the Environmental Statement (“ES”). Table 11-1 summarises the requirements of the NPSNN for developers. Table 11-1: Summary of relevant NPSNN advice on landscape and visual impact assessment Summary of NPS provision Consideration within the PEI Report Paragraph 5.144. The assessment should include The relevant National Character Areas developed by reference to any landscape character assessment Natural England, and landscape character areas as and associated studies and take account of any developed by North Somerset Council have been relevant policies based on these assessments in local identified and the potential effects on these areas development documents in England. have been assessed. Paragraph 5.145. The assessment should include any The landscape and visual assessment considers significant effects during the construction of the potentially significant effects during the project and/or the significant effects of the construction phase and the operation phase. completed development in its operation on landscape components and landscape character (including historic landscape characterisation). Paragraph 5.146. The assessment should include the An approximate visual envelope has been developed visibility and conspicuousness of the project during for the DCO Scheme and the potential significant construction and of the presence and operation of change in views cause by the DCO Scheme from the project and potential impacts on views and within that area have been assessed. visual amenity. This should include any noise and light pollution effects, including on local amenity, tranquillity and nature conservation. National Planning Policy Framework The landscape and visual impact assessment has been considered in relation to the National Planning Policy Framework (“NPPF”) Chapter 7 Requiring good design and Chapter 12 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment. NPPF Chapter 7 states that planning policies should: “respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local surroundings and materials, while not preventing or discouraging appropriate innovation” (paragraph 58) be “visually attractive as a result of good architecture and appropriate landscaping” (paragraph 58) and in addition, it is “proper to seek to promote or reinforce local distinctiveness” (paragraph 60), and 11-2 PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY CHAPTER 11 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT “take the opportunities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Iron Age Tom Moore
    The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Medieval Period, Its Main Conclusion Is They Were Compiled at Malmesbury
    Early Medieval 10 Early Medieval Edited by Chris Webster from contributions by Mick Aston, Bruce Eagles, David Evans, Keith Gardner, Moira and Brian Gittos, Teresa Hall, Bill Horner, Susan Pearce, Sam Turner, Howard Williams and Barbara Yorke 10.1 Introduction raphy, as two entities: one “British” (covering most 10.1.1 Early Medieval Studies of the region in the 5th century, and only Cornwall by the end of the period), and one “Anglo-Saxon” The South West of England, and in particular the three (focusing on the Old Sarum/Salisbury area from the western counties of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset, later 5th century and covering much of the region has a long history of study of the Early Medieval by the 7th and 8th centuries). This is important, not period. This has concentrated on the perceived “gap” only because it has influenced past research questions, between the end of the Roman period and the influ- but also because this ethnic division does describe (if ence of Anglo-Saxon culture; a gap of several hundred not explain) a genuine distinction in the archaeological years in the west of the region. There has been less evidence in the earlier part of the period. Conse- emphasis on the eastern parts of the region, perhaps quently, research questions have to deal less with as they are seen as peripheral to Anglo-Saxon studies a period, than with a highly complex sequence of focused on the east of England. The region identi- different types of Early Medieval archaeology, shifting fied as the kingdom of Dumnonia has received detailed both chronologically and geographically in which issues treatment in most recent work on the subject, for of continuity and change from the Roman period, and example Pearce (1978; 2004), KR Dark (1994) and the evolution of medieval society and landscape, frame Somerset has been covered by Costen (1992) with an internally dynamic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Downland
    8. LANDSCAPE TYPE 1: OPEN DOWNLAND Location and Boundaries 8.1. The landscape type encompasses a number of distinct downland blocks from the Marlborough Downs (1A) and Horton Down (1C) in the west running through to the Lambourn Downs (1B) and Blewbury Downs (1D) in the east. Boundaries are mainly defined by topography and the Upper Chalk geology, and in the north relate to the top of the Scarp (landscape type 5). To the south, the edge of the chalk similarly forms a distinct boundary. Overview The Open Downlands are the remote heart and core of the North Wessex Downs, with the dramatic landscapes created by the underlying chalk rocks being one of the defining features of the AONB. The subtle curves and undulations of the landform are revealed by the uniform clothing of cropped grass or cereals creating a landscape with a simple and elemental quality, accentuated by vast skies. The open, expansive views are punctuated by distinctive beech clumps crowning the downland summits, forming prominent and highly visible landmarks. Sparsely populated, the downlands possess a strong sense remoteness and isolation. Predominantly in arable cultivation these are landscapes of great seasonal variation, with muted browns and greys of the chalk and flinty soils in the ploughed autumn fields, giving way to fresh greens of the emerging crops in winter and spring and sweeping yellows and golds of summer. The characteristic close-cropped springy downland turf of the surviving herb-rich chalk grassland provides an important habitat and this landscape type contains the largest areas of designated chalk grassland in the AONB, with 15 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Biodiversity
    PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT VOLUME 2 C HAPTER 9 Ecology and Biodiversity Table of Contents Section Page 9 Ecology and Biodiversity ..................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9-1 9.2 Legislation and Policy Framework ................................................................................... 9-2 9.3 Methodology.................................................................................................................... 9-5 9.4 Baseline, Future Conditions, and Importance of Features ............................................ 9-19 9.5 Measures Adopted as Part of the DCO Scheme ............................................................ 9-51 9.6 Assessment of Effects .................................................................................................... 9-52 9.7 Mitigation and Residual Effects ..................................................................................... 9-66 9.8 Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................................... 9-67 9.9 Limitations Encountered in Compiling the PEI Report................................................... 9-68 9.10 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 9-69 9.11 References ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portishead Branch Line (Metrowest Phase 1)
    Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 6.25, Environmental Statement, Volume 4, Appendix 9.1, Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Part 1 of 2 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009, regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Author: CH2M Date: November 2019 Notice © Copyright 2019 CH2M HILL United Kingdom. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of CH2M HILL United Kingdom, a wholly owned subsidiary of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by Jacobs for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the quality management system of Jacobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoke Leigh Iron Age Camp Leigh Woods, North Somerset File:///D:/Users/Ruth/Documents/PC Website/New Test Site/Articles by
    Stoke Leigh Iron Age Camp Leigh Woods, North Somerset file:///D:/Users/Ruth/Documents/PC Website/new test site/Articles by ... Leigh Woods, North Somerset Fig 1 Reproduced as a Section from the Stokeleigh OS Map 2005 1:2500 Courtesy of the National Trust (Wessex Region), Leigh Woods Office, Bristol Nigel B.Bain MA, BD May 2009 There is an extensive number of diverse hillforts scattered across the West of England. The phased National Mapping Programme is currently pinpointing even more of these. Stokeleigh is the classic example of one type of hillfort construction popular during the first millennium BC, a ‘promontory’ fort. It is particularly significant in that its sturdy defences are still fairly well-preserved. What is even more remarkable about this impressive site is not only that it remains relatively unscathed 1 of 18 11/09/2020, 12:46 Stoke Leigh Iron Age Camp Leigh Woods, North Somerset file:///D:/Users/Ruth/Documents/PC Website/new test site/Articles by ... but that so little is known or has been written about it. As a result, the National Trust in collaboration with English Heritage and Natural England has recently taken the welcome decision to restore its original profile*. Particular credit must go to Mr Bill Morris, Head Warden at the NT Office in Leigh Woods and his team, for the tremendous work done in clearing the camp of its overgrowth, not to mention his own support for this project. It has been a pleasure to watch the site ‘unfold’. It has made possible the kind of accompanying photographic evidence here as never before.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd Morgan, F.R.S
    T6uttoalls ann ^tokeleigf) Camps. BY PROFESSOR C. LLOYD MORGAN, F.R.S. ILLIAM BARRETT in his History and Antiquities of the City of Bristol (1789), gives a bird’s eje view of the three camps which overlook the Avon Gorge, near Clifton f and his sketch, incorrect as it undoubtedly is, may serve as an indication of some of their features, at a time when they were comparatively intact. Attributing them, as was in his day the custom, to the Romans, he thus describes what he believed to be their manner of construction. “ The commanding spot on Leigh-down and Clifton Hill, on the very summit of the rock on each side of the river being chosen ; they marked out the compass of the intended camps, allotted a convenient area in each, dug out the four fosses, rose the three ramparts or valla, and with the stones here ready(1) at hand, constructed the high strong walls, heaping the stones together in a very irregular manner, and sloping it gradually to the top, from eighteen or twenty feet at the base, to two or three at the crest, pouring their boiling mortar among the loosely piled stones, which being thin and fluid, insinuated itself into the many openings and hollows of the work, and by its strength, bound together all the irregular pieces of stone into a compact wall, as appears evident at this day.”2 . Barrett, plate 2, p. 18. (2) Barrett, p. 17. Vol. XL VII (Third Series, Vol. VII), Part 11. 2 e 218 Papers, §*c. Separate plans of all three camps are given by Manhj, in his Fugitive Sketches (1802).^ They are probably more correct than Barrett’s bird’s eye view, and were evidently prepared with some care.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Meadows
    WIssue 106 • SUMMERil 2016dlife Summer meadows My Wild Child Walton Common Save our wildflowers Wild play for toddlers Explore the meadows Why we need to in urban parks and meet the Dexters! act now Includes UK news & stories Protecting Wildlife for the Future Welcome Dear member I can’t imagine living in a land with no seasons. I love the changes – and the surprises. This year’s mild winter led to some remarkable early spring flowering, of bluebells, for example. Yet there was late flowering by others, in particular, hawthorn. It was cool and dry for the first half of spring (with a seeming dearth of insects) and then wet, resulting in a completely new mix of early summer blooms. It’s been all-change at the Trust, too. We said farewell to MARK CARWARDINE MARK our inspirational Chief Executive Bevis Watts, who in three years has transformed the Trust (he’s now director of the Roz Kidman Cox ethical bank Triodos but remains a stalwart supporter). Taking Trust Chair his place, arriving with equal energy, comes Ian Barrett: environmentalist, partnership-builder and, very importantly, a member. The Trust is the sum of its members – who often provide practical as well as financial support. So it’s been good to hear from you via the survey about the information you’d like more of. Top of the list is more about reserves. As a member, Ian has already visited most of the reserves, and with this magazine, you’ll find the top-ten reserves guide. Later in the year, watch out for Ian’s news of an exciting new acquisition.
    [Show full text]
  • (2.57 Acres), Subject to Planning
    Exciting Development Opportunity approx. 1.04 ha (2.57 acres), subject to planning Former Chippenham Law Courts, Pewsham Way, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN15 3BF Highlights - Freehold - Approximately 2.57 acres (1.04 ha) - Former Law Courts, built circa 1996 - Good road linkages (A4/M4) - Prominent roundabout and road frontage Location Chippenham is an attractive market town and important commercial centre on the M4 corridor. The town is located approximately 14 miles from Bath, 28 miles from Bristol and only three miles south of junction 17 on the M4 motorway. Chippenham Train Station is approximately one mile to the north. The station is on the main London to Bristol railway line with regular services to London Paddington (a journey time of approximately 70 minutes). Bristol Airport is located approximately 30 miles west and Heathrow and Gatwick airports are accessible within 1.5 and two hours respectively. Chippenham is one of the major centres within North Wiltshire and provides an important location for a range of occupiers. Chippenham has a population of 44,820 as at the 2012 census and is administered by Wiltshire Council. It has over the last ten years benefitted from above average employment growth rates. The premises are located on the corner of the A4/Pewsham Way roundabout and benefits from proximity to the A350 and A4 road networks which in turn provide access to the M4 motorway. The premises are situated approximately 0.8 miles south of Chippenham town centre. Surrounding uses include dense residential to the south, north, and east, and agricultural land to the west. Approximate Site Areas (acres) Chippenham Law Courts, car park and surrounding site 2.57 acres (Indicative boundary edged red) Accommodation (approximate area sq ft) Former Law Court (GIA) 26,020 sq ft Description The site consists of a triangular parcel of land totalling approximately 2.57 acres which includes the former law courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Technical Summary
    PORTISHEAD BRANCH LI NE PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMAT I O N R E P O R T V O L U M E 1 Non-Technical Summary PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 1 Table of Contents Section Page 1 Non-Technical Summary ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Study Area .................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Scheme Development and Alternatives Considered ................................................. 1-9 1.4 Description of the Proposed Works ......................................................................... 1-11 1.5 Approach to the Environmental Statement ............................................................ 1-21 1.6 The Planning Framework ......................................................................................... 1-23 1.7 Air Quality ................................................................................................................ 1-24 1.8 Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................................... 1-25 1.9 Ecology and Biodiversity .......................................................................................... 1-28 1.10 Ground Conditions ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Volume 2 Edited by Howard Williams and Liam Delaney Aims and Scope Offa’s Dyke Journal is a peer-reviewed venue for the publication of high-quality research on the archaeology, history and heritage of frontiers and borderlands focusing on the Anglo-Welsh border. The editors invite submissions that explore dimensions of Offa’s Dyke, Wat’s Dyke and the ‘short dykes’ of western Britain, including their life-histories and landscape contexts. ODJ will also consider comparative studies on the material culture and monumentality of frontiers and borderlands from elsewhere in Britain, Europe and beyond. We accept: 1. Notes and Reviews of up to 3,000 words 2. Interim reports on fieldwork of up to 5,000 words 3. Original discussions, syntheses and analyses of up to 10,000 words ODJ is published by JAS Arqueología, and is supported by the University of Chester and the Offa’s Dyke Association. The journal is open access, free to authors and readers: http://revistas.jasarqueologia.es/index. php/odjournal/. Print copies of the journal are available for purchase from Archaeopress with a discount available for members of the Offa’s Dyke Association: https://www.archaeopress.com/ Editors Professor Howard Williams BSc MA PhD FSA (Professor of Archaeology, University of Chester) Email: [email protected] Liam Delaney BA MA MCIfA (Doctoral Researcher, University of Chester) Email: [email protected] Editorial Board Dr Paul Belford BSc MA PhD FSA MCIfA (Director, Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust (CPAT)) Andrew Blake (AONB Officer, Wye Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Wellesley Road
    WELLESLEY ROAD Conservation Area Appraisal Consultation Draft May 2018 WELLESLEY ROAD l 2 Foreword I am pleased to present the draft Wellesley Road Conservation Area Appraisal. Wellesley Road and its surrounding streets are an important part of Chiswick and a valuable part of the heritage of the borough. This draft appraisal builds on the original conservation statements for Hounslow’s conservation areas and has been reviewed as part of a comprehensive review of Hounslow’s conservation area statements. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an overview of historic developments and key components that contribute to the special interest. This appraisal will also identify positive and negative contributors as well as opportunities for improvement in order to inform a comprehensive understanding of the conservation area. The regeneration of the Great West Corridor and Brentford East offers the opportunity to improve the west end of Chiswick High Road through high quality new development and improved public realm. We KRSHWKLVGRFXPHQWZLOOSOD\DVLJQL¿FDQWUROHLQWKHIXWXUHPDQDJHPHQWRI:HOOHVOH\5RDG&RQVHUYDWLRQ Area and will be a guide for developers, residents and planners. We look forward to hearing your views on the draft appraisal and will amend this where appropriate, following consultation. Steve Curran Councillor Steve Curran Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration WELLESLEY ROAD l 3 Executive Summary Presented here is the consultation draft version of the Wellesley Road Conservation Area Appraisal. The purpose of a conservation area appraisal is to provide an overview of the historic development of the area and to describe the key components that contribute to the special interest of the area.
    [Show full text]