DOCSLIB.ORG

Portishead Branch Line (Metrowest Phase 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 6.25, Environmental Statement, Volume 4, Appendix 9.1, Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Part 1 of 2 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009, regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Author: CH2M Date: November 2019 Notice © Copyright 2019 CH2M HILL United Kingdom. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of CH2M HILL United Kingdom, a wholly owned subsidiary of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by Jacobs for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the quality management system of Jacobs. Document history Project Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) Development Consent Order Scheme Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR040011 Reference Part and Application Document 6, 6.25 Reference Document title Environmental Statement, Volume 4, Appendix 9.1 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Part 1 of 2 Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Applicant North Somerset District Council Lead Author CW at CH2M Version Date Status of Version Rev: 01 11/11/19 Application Issue Table of Contents Section Page 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background to the DCO Scheme ....................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Structure of this Report ................................................. 1-1 2 Methodology ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Desk Study ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Field Survey ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Aerial Habitat Assessment ................................................................. 2-6 2.4 Limitations .......................................................................................... 2-6 2.5 Evaluation .......................................................................................... 2-7 3 Legislative, Planning and BAP Context .................................................... 3-1 3.1 Legislative Framework ....................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Planning Policy .................................................................................. 3-2 3.3 Biodiversity Action Plans .................................................................... 3-5 4 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Context .............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Natural Areas ..................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Designated Sites ................................................................................ 4-2 4.4 Habitats .............................................................................................. 4-8 4.5 Species ............................................................................................ 4-22 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Value of Ecological Features ............................................................. 5-1 5.2 Further Surveys ................................................................................. 5-4 6 References and Bibliography .................................................................... 6-1 Annexes Annex 1 Target Notes and Photographs, April 2014 Annex 2A: Target Notes and Photographs, 2016 Annex 2: Target Notes and Photographs, July 2015 Annex 3: Target Notes and Photographs, Ashton Vale June 2016 Annex 4: Target Notes and Photographs, Construction and Mirco-Compounds, May 2016 Annex 5: Target Notes and Photographs, February 2017 Annex 6: Target Notes and Photographs, Construction Compounds, March 2018 Annex 7: Target Notes and Photographs, Leigh Woods, July 2019 Table(s) Table 2.1: Summary of target notes and the corresponding Phase 1 Habitat Survey Table 3.1: Summary of local policy Table 4.1: Bristol Wildlife Corridor Sites (“BWCS”) within 0.5 km of the study area Table 4.2: Locations of recorded non-native/invasive plant species in the 2015 survey area of the freight line (Figure 8) Table 4.3: Locations of recorded notable plant species in the 2015 survey area of the freight line (Figure 8 i Table 5.1: Summary of further surveys for protected species Figure(s) Presented in Appendix 9.1, Part 2 of 2 Figure 1: Phase 1 and Aerial Assessment Habitat Mapping (Sheets 1 to 22) Figure 2: Sheepway Construction Compound Figure 3: Land of Portbury Hundred Construction Compound (Sheets 1 to 2) Figure 4: M5 Bridleway Extension (Sheets 1 to 5) Figure 5: Pill Station Construction Compound Figure 6: Ham Green Construction Compound Figure 7: Quarry Bridge No. 2 Construction Compound Figure 8: Rownham Hill Figure 9: Clanage Road Construction Compound Figure 10: Ashton Vale Construction Compound (Sheets 1 to 2) Figure 11: South Liberty Lane ii Acronyms and Abbreviations BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BRERC Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre BWCS Bristol Wildlife Corridor Site DCO Development consent order ES Environmental Statement HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment HSI Habitat Suitability Index IEEM Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee MAGIC Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside website NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NERC Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 NNR National Nature Reserve NSC North Somerset Council SAC Special Area of Conservation SNA Strategic Nature Area SNCI Site of Nature Conservation Importance SPA Special Protection Area SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest WCA Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 WS Wildlife Site iii APPENDIX 9.1 EXTENDED PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE DCO SCHEME ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT, VOLUME 4 SECTION 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to the DCO Scheme CH2M HILL was commissioned by North Somerset District Council (“NSDC”) on behalf of the West of England Authorities to update a previous Ecological Appraisal report (Halcrow, 2011) and to undertake an ecological appraisal for the Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) Development Consent Order Scheme (“the DCO Scheme”). The study area initially extended between Portishead and Pill village, but was extended to Parson Street Junction, where the railway joins the Bristol to Exeter mainline. The Portishead Branch Line was built in the 1860s. Passenger services continued between Portishead and Bristol until 1964, and freight services continued to 1981. The Royal Portbury Dock opened in 1978 and in 2002 the currently operational part of the former Portishead Branch Line was re- opened to service the port for freight only. The owner of the Royal Portbury Dock, Bristol Port Company, has commercial rights to run up to 20 freight trains per day in each direction along the operational railway line. The current volume of freight trains operating is substantially less than this. In order to reintroduce passenger services the disused railway between Portishead and Pill has to be rebuilt. The construction of the disused section is a nationally significant infrastructure project (“NSIP”) as defined by the Planning Act 2008 and therefore a DCO is required for powers to build and operate the railway, as well as to acquire land, where it cannot be acquired by negotiation. The DCO also includes associated development such as the new station and car parks at Portishead, the re-opening of the former Pill station and new car park and other works along the operational railway between Pill and Ashton Junction. Any works required between Ashton Junction and Parson Street Junction will be undertaken by Network Rail under their permitted development rights. This report should be read in conjunction with the Environmental Statement Chapter 4 Description of the Proposed Works (DCO Document Reference 6.7). 1.2 Purpose and Structure of this Report The purpose of this report is to review the existing baseline data for the DCO Scheme, present the results of the Phase 1 and aerial assessment habitat survey and identify further specialist surveys required. The report is structured as follows: • Section 2 – Methodology. This section summarises the methodology followed for the desk study and field surveys.
Recommended publications
  • Entomology Day 2018 Wyre Forest Study Group

    Entomology Day 2018 Wyre Forest Study Group

    Wyre Forest Study Group Entomology Day 2018 ChaIR: Brett WestwOOD, RepOrt: SUsan LIMbreY Flights of Fancy Speakers from left: Wendy Carter, Steven Falk, Richard Comont, Brett Westwood, Malcolm Smart, Erica McAlister, Gary Farmer Steve Horton Chaired by Brett Westwood, our title gave speak- in 1983, this book, with its simple keys, big genera di- ers scope to cover a range of topics, out of which a vided into smaller keys and short snappy text with an recurring theme of concern about pollinating insects ecological flavour, made recording much easier, broke became apparent. down barriers, and influenced Steven’s own later work. He spent his second undergraduate year doing 13 dip- Steven Falk, in Breaking Down Barriers to In- tera plates for Michael Chinery’s Collins Guide to the vertebrate Identification, told us that throughout Insects of Britain and Northern Europe (1986), one of his career he has been committed to making entomol- five artists illustrating 2000 species, another ground- ogy accessible no matter what level of expertise peo- breaking book. Steven showed us how his technique ple may have. He started as an artist, and he showed us progressed through the book, for example with lateral some of his childhood, but far from childish, pictures of lighting giving a three dimensional effect. birds. He was as fascinated by the literature and by the artists and their techniques, as by the natural history, In 1985, work began on illustrations for George Else’s citing Roger Tory Peterson, the father of modern user- Handbook to British Bees. Pen and ink, using combi- friendly field guides, the draughtsmanship of Charles nations of stippling and cross-hatching, produced an Tunnicliffe using watercolours, and Basil Ede, using amazing array of tones and textures, and Steven ac- gouache, among others.
  • The Quaternary Evolution of the Gordano Valley, North Somerset

    The Quaternary Evolution of the Gordano Valley, North Somerset

    The Quaternary Evolution of the Gordano Valley, North Somerset, UK. Thomas Charles Bernard Hill A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Faculty of the Built Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol January 2006 Abstract The Gordano Valley is a low-lying valley positioned in close proximity to the Severn Estuary, in southwest England. Although its late Quaternary and Holocene sedimentary archive is extensive, the spatial and temporal evolution of the Gordano Valley has received only limited attention from previous researchers. In this study, stratigraphic analysis of the valley archive, combined with pollen, diatom and particle size analysis are utilised in a detailed reconstruction of the evolution of the Gordano Valley. Two contrasting depositional environments are present, separated by a sedimentary ridge traversing the width of the valley. A tentative mechanism is presented for the development of the ridge in response to periglacial hillslope erosion and deposition during the Devensian glacial period (c. 115,000-11,500 Cal. yrs BP). In contrast, the chronology and development of the two depositional environments is clearer. Detailed multiproxy analysis of the two sedimentary archives reveals the development of an enclosed lake basin headward of the ridge during the late glacial period (c. 18,000-15,000 Cal. yrs BP). Subsequent climatic amelioration in response to the transition from glacial to interglacial conditions resulted in the terrestrialisation of the lake at the onset of the BØlling/AllerØd interstadial, c. 15,000 Cal. yrs BP. A complete hydroseral succession sequence is present in the headward region of the valley, where the terrestrialised lake sequence developed into the fen peatland that is present today.
  • Metabarcoding for the Parallel Identification of Several Hundred Predators And

    Metabarcoding for the Parallel Identification of Several Hundred Predators And

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/155721; this version posted June 26, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of several hundred predators and their preys: application to bat species diet analysis MAXIME GALAN*1, JEAN-BAPTISTE PONS2, ORIANNE TOURNAYRE1, ERIC PIERRE1, MAXIME LEUCHTMANN3, DOMINIQUE PONTIER2.4.* and NATHALIE CHARBONNEL1* Full postal addresses 1CBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, MontpElliEr SupAgro, Univ. MontpelliEr, MontpelliEr, FrancE 2Univ Lyon, LabEx ECOFECT EcoEvolutionary Dynamics of InfEctious DisEasEs, Villeurbanne F-69365 Lyon, France 3 Nature EnvironnEment, 2 AvEnuE Saint-Pierre, 17700 Surgères, France 4Univ Lyon, UnivErsité Lyon 1, CNRS, LaboratoirE dE BiométriE Et BiologiE ÉvolutivE UMR5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France * equal author contributions Keywords (4-6): Chiroptera, arthropods, Environmental DNA (EDNA), high-throughput sequencing, false positives, predator–prey interactions Name, address, fax number and email of corresponding author * Maxime Galan, INRA, UMR CBGP (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/MontpElliEr Supagro/Univ. MontpelliEr), 755 avEnue du Campus Agropolis, CS 300 16, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France. Fax: (+00 33) 04 99 62 33 05; E-mail: [email protected] Running title : Metabarcoding of prEdators and their preys 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/155721; this version posted June 26, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)

    Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)

    NELMS target statement for Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118) Your application is scored and a decision made on the points awarded. Both top priorities and lower priorities score points but you should select at least one top priority. Scoring is carried out by... Choosing priorities To apply you should choose at least one of the top priorities, and you can choose lower priorities - this may help with your application. Top priorities Priority group Priority type Biodiversity Priority habitats Priority species Water Water quality Flood and coastal risk management Historic environment Designated historic and archaeological features Undesignated historic and archaeological features of high significance Woodland priorities Woodland management Woodland planting Landscape Climate Change Multiple environmental benefits Lower priorities Priority group Priority type Lower priorities Water quality Archaeological and historic features Woodland Biodiversity - top priorities Priority habitats You should carry out land management practices and capital works that maintains, restores and creates priority habitats. Maintain priority habitat such as: • Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional orchard • Lowland dry acid grassland Wood Pasture and Parkland Restore priority habitats (especially proposals which make existing sites bigger or help join up habitat networks) such as: ● Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional
  • Ecology and Biodiversity

    Ecology and Biodiversity

    PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT VOLUME 2 C HAPTER 9 Ecology and Biodiversity Table of Contents Section Page 9 Ecology and Biodiversity ..................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9-1 9.2 Legislation and Policy Framework ................................................................................... 9-2 9.3 Methodology.................................................................................................................... 9-5 9.4 Baseline, Future Conditions, and Importance of Features ............................................ 9-19 9.5 Measures Adopted as Part of the DCO Scheme ............................................................ 9-51 9.6 Assessment of Effects .................................................................................................... 9-52 9.7 Mitigation and Residual Effects ..................................................................................... 9-66 9.8 Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................................... 9-67 9.9 Limitations Encountered in Compiling the PEI Report................................................... 9-68 9.10 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 9-69 9.11 References ....................................................................................................................
  • Ireland's Biodiversity in 2010

    Ireland's Biodiversity in 2010

    Biodiversity in 2010 State of Knowledge Ireland’s Biodiversity in 2010: State of Knowledge Editors: Úna FitzPatrick, Eugenie Regan and Liam Lysaght Citation: FitzPatrick, Ú., Regan, E. and Lysaght, L. (editors)(2010) Ireland’s Biodiversity in 2010: State of Knowledge. National Biodiversity Data Centre, Waterford. © National Biodiversity Data Centre 2010 ISBN 978-1-906304-15-7 Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 3 Habitats (non-marine) 7 Vegetation 8 Fungi 9 Lichens 11 Bryophytes 12 Algae 13 Vascular plants 15 Non-insect invertebrates 17 Insects 21 Tunicates & lancelets 24 Marine fishes 25 Freshwater fishes 27 Amphibians & reptiles 29 Birds 31 Land mammals 33 Bats 34 Marine mammals 35 References 36 Appendix 41 The National Biodiversity Data Centre is an initiative of the Heritage Council and is operated under a service level agreement by Compass Informatics. The Centre is funded by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. Foreword Dr Liam Lysaght Ireland, along with its EU partners, agreed to ‘Halt biodiversity loss by 2010’. Before we can halt biodiversity loss, we need to have some understanding of what that biodiversity resource is. As a contribution to this target, and to mark International Year of Biodiversity 2010, the National Biodiversity Data Centre set out to produce an overview of the state of knowledge on Ireland’s biodiversity. The scope of this task relates only to knowledge on what species and habitats occur in Ireland, how they are distributed, and how their range and/or populations are changing. Ecosystem function and conservation management are outside the remit of the Centre thus are not addressed in this document.
  • Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for North Somerset Council

    Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for North Somerset Council

    Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for North Somerset Council Electoral review July 2014 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 020 7664 8534 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2014 Contents Summary 1 Introduction 5 2 Analysis and final recommendations 7 Submissions received 7 Electorate figures 8 Council size 8 Electoral fairness 9 General analysis 10 Electoral arrangements 11 Pill, Gordano Valley and rural north, east and south 11 Portishead 16 Nailsea 17 Weston-super-Mare 18 Clevedon 21 Rural south west 23 Conclusions 23 Parish electoral arrangements 23 3 What happens next? 27 4 Mapping 29 Appendices A Table A1: Final recommendations for North Somerset 30 Council B Glossary and abbreviations 34 Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body which conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We are conducting an electoral review of North Somerset Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority.
  • 170817DC Gordano Open Days 2017 Plan

    170817DC Gordano Open Days 2017 Plan

    Gordano Open Days September 7-10th 2017 As part of English Heritage Open Days we have designated a collection of venues in the Gordano Valley that are architecturally and historically significant to our local community. They are referred to as Gordano Open Days. We have laid out a trail of several miles that takes our visitors through villages that are little changed from when they were agricultural societies in medieval times and through other parts of the community that were involved with the industrial revolution and with the more recent mechanized agricultural processes. We have structures that were influenced by the great inventors such as Isambard Brunel and Henry Bessemer and by architects such as Edward Gabriel. Our journey ends at the entrance to the Portishead Marina in what is now one of the fastest growing towns in Europe. It is a pleasant journey starting with historic Portbury, passing through the idyllic Gordano Valley and then along the coast road that follows the shoreline of the Severn Estuary. Having the second highest tide fall in the world the Estuary surges in and out twice daily and over the years has carved scenic bays and inlets from the rugged and rocky coastline. Sites along the way are accessible by automobile or by footpath and visitors can set their own pace or select the portions that are of personal interest. Maps will be provided explaining points of interest. We will be accommodating walking groups and cyclist and refreshment will be available at each stage. There is a mixture of serene and peaceful churches and buildings that have been remodelled with the latest modern conveniences and that are very much alive and active.
  • Palaeolithic and Mesolithic

    Palaeolithic and Mesolithic

    Palaeolithic and Mesolithic 2 Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Robert Hosfield, Vanessa Straker and Paula Gardiner with contributions from Anthony Brown, Paul Davies, Ralph Fyfe, Julie Jones and Heather Tinsley 2.1 Introduction For the Palaeolithic periods the open-landscape archaeology is dominated by lithic scatters (predom- The South West contains a diverse variety of Palaeo- inantly of deeply buried artefacts, frequently in fluvial lithic and Mesolithic archaeology of differing degrees deposits, and particularly true in the Lower and of significance. This reflects the nature of the arch- Middle Palaeolithic), although occupation sites such as aeological material itself, the histories of research Hengistbury Head (Barton 1992) and Kent’s Cavern in different parts of the region and, with regard to (Campbell and Sampson 1971) are also present. the Palaeolithic period, the differential preservation For the Mesolithic, there are greater numbers of of Pleistocene landforms and deposits throughout the excavated sites (especially from Somerset), although region. One of the key features of the Palaeolithic surface or shallow sub-surface lithic scatters are still archaeology is the presence of a significant cave-based common, especially in the west. resource in south Devon and northern Somerset, which is unquestionably of national significance (see Overall, the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic archae- for example, Campbell and Sampson 1971; Tratman ology of this region is generally rather poorly known, et al. 1971; Bishop 1975; Harrison 1977; Straw 1995; reflecting an absence of robust geochronological 1996; Andrews et al. 1999). frameworks, the predominance of research into a handful of cave and open sites over the lithic scatter In terms of an open-landscape Palaeolithic record, resource (whether located on the surface or deeply there is an inevitable bias towards those areas with buried) and the absence of any major syntheses.
  • A Guide to the Shropshire Orthoptera and Dermaptera by David W. Williams

    A Guide to the Shropshire Orthoptera and Dermaptera by David W. Williams

    A Guide to the Shropshire Orthoptera and Dermaptera by David W. Williams Excluding escapes and naturalised aliens (eg Egyptian grasshopper, house cricket) thirteen species of Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets etc) and three species of Dermaptera (earwigs) have been recorded in Shropshire. Two further species currently occur in adjacent counties. Cockroaches & mantids (Dictyoptera) are also included within the 'orthopteroid' insects (as are phasmids). Britain has three native species of cockroach, but it is unlikely that any of them will turn up in Shropshire (though there are old records of Oriental cockroach, an established alien inhabitant of artificially heated places). This guide is intended to cover all the species likely to be encountered in the field in Shropshire. Orthoptera; Caelifera: grasshoppers (5 spp.), groundhoppers (2 spp.) Grasshoppers are insects of high Summer. They overwinter as eggs, hatch in Spring and mature during June and July, persisting into Autumn. Groundhopper life-cycles are more variable. They overwinter as either nymphs or adults and can be found as adults in any month of the year, though there is a peak of activity in Spring. Sexing Grasshoppers Identification of grasshoppers can sometimes be helped if the gender of the insect is established. Several features separate the sexes. The main picture, left, shows a pair of meadow grasshoppers. Notice that the male is smaller than the female, but has obviously longer antennae. This is true of all British grasshoppers. He also has relatively larger eyes and longer wings, though these differences can be very subtle in some species (in meadow grasshoppers, females have particularly short wings). The lower pair of photographs show the difference in the abdominal tips of the two sexes (in this case both are mottled grasshoppers).
  • Index to Bristol Naturalists' Society Proceedings

    Index to Bristol Naturalists' Society Proceedings

    Index to Bristol Naturalists' Society Proceedings and Nature in Avon from 1863 to 2015 Articles from 1863 to 1993 are in the "Proceedings" section of the Biodiversity Library, those from 1994 onwards are in the "Nature in Avon" section. Date Author Subject 1862 BNS Inaugurated 1863 Beddoe, Dr J The Maori race 1863 Groome CO Cranium of New Zealanders 1863 Martin F Marine zoology of Clevedon 1863 Stoddart WW Tea and its adulteration 1864 Carpenter WL Water glass in decorations 1864 Collens E Improvement of Mohr's burette 1864 Coomber T Wells and water quality 1864 Davies D Inhabitants of the British Isles 1864 Fripp H The glow-worm 1864 Groome CO Nidification of British Birds 1 1864 Groome CO Nidification of British Birds 2 1864 Herspath Dr Solar power, radiation, emanation 1864 Martyn Dr Sea cucumber 1864 Moore C Geological ramble to Patchway 1864 Ponton TG Land & freshwater molluscs of Bristol 1864 Stoddart WW Naturalist's walk near Bristol 1864 Swayne SH Anthropoid Apes 1865 Barber Wings of insects 1865 Carpenter WL Eozoon Canadense fossil 1865 Carpenter WL Gun cotton 1865 Cossham H Pennant formation of the Bristol Coalfield 1865 Fripp H Eye in Cephalopod Molluscs 1865 Fripp HE Sight in Fishes 1865 Harding Ferns of New Zealand 1865 Jordan HK Rock-boring molluscs 1865 Leipner Red sea weed 1865 Lobb BN First experience in Aquaria 1865 Noble A Utilisation of sewage 1865 Owen H Periopthalmus papilio 1865 Ponton TG The foot of bi-valve molluscs 1865 Ravis C Raised beaches of Weston-super-mare 1865 Sanders W Old red sandstone beds 1865 Stoddart WW Fossil land and freshwater molluscs 1865 Yabbicom Starch 1866 Stoddart WW Devonian palaeontology 1866 Carpenter WL Artificial formation of flint 1866 Carpenter WL Pharoah's Serpents' Eggs 1866 Fripp HE Sight in Fishes 1866 Smith GN Bone-cave near Tenby 1866 Stoddart WW Ammonites planorbis 1866 Stoddart WW Involutina liassica fossil 1866 Ravis CF Amber 1866 Sec.
  • Summer Meadows

    Summer Meadows

    WIssue 106 • SUMMERil 2016dlife Summer meadows My Wild Child Walton Common Save our wildflowers Wild play for toddlers Explore the meadows Why we need to in urban parks and meet the Dexters! act now Includes UK news & stories Protecting Wildlife for the Future Welcome Dear member I can’t imagine living in a land with no seasons. I love the changes – and the surprises. This year’s mild winter led to some remarkable early spring flowering, of bluebells, for example. Yet there was late flowering by others, in particular, hawthorn. It was cool and dry for the first half of spring (with a seeming dearth of insects) and then wet, resulting in a completely new mix of early summer blooms. It’s been all-change at the Trust, too. We said farewell to MARK CARWARDINE MARK our inspirational Chief Executive Bevis Watts, who in three years has transformed the Trust (he’s now director of the Roz Kidman Cox ethical bank Triodos but remains a stalwart supporter). Taking Trust Chair his place, arriving with equal energy, comes Ian Barrett: environmentalist, partnership-builder and, very importantly, a member. The Trust is the sum of its members – who often provide practical as well as financial support. So it’s been good to hear from you via the survey about the information you’d like more of. Top of the list is more about reserves. As a member, Ian has already visited most of the reserves, and with this magazine, you’ll find the top-ten reserves guide. Later in the year, watch out for Ian’s news of an exciting new acquisition.