Exploring Ecological Citizenship, Systems Thinking, and Environmental Governance in Southwest Yukon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Ecological Citizenship, Systems Thinking, and Environmental Governance in Southwest Yukon Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 2020 Seeking a Path to Wellness and Flourishing: Exploring Ecological Citizenship, Systems Thinking, and Environmental Governance in Southwest Yukon Amanda Solmes [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Human Geography Commons, and the Nature and Society Relations Commons Recommended Citation Solmes, Amanda, "Seeking a Path to Wellness and Flourishing: Exploring Ecological Citizenship, Systems Thinking, and Environmental Governance in Southwest Yukon" (2020). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 2244. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/2244 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Seeking a Path to Wellness and Flourishing: Exploring Ecological Citizenship, Systems Thinking, and Environmental Governance in Southwest Yukon by AMANDA ROSE SOLMES Bachelor of Business Administration, WLU, 2009 Thesis Submitted to the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Master of Environmental Studies degree Wilfrid Laurier University 2019 © Amanda Solmes 2019 Abstract While efforts toward environmental management (EM) have been increasing, the state of our natural world is getting worse. Numerous reports have outlined that today’s environmental problems are predominantly human-induced, yet approaches to EM often only address “environmental” rather than “human” issues. More holistic approaches are required. This thesis explores “ecological citizenship” (EC) as an alternative framework that may have the potential to address elements too often left out of top-down and reductionist approaches. Academic and case-based notions of this concept are explored, and a new definition for the term is developed. A case study, drawn from the rich results of in-depth interviews, and analyzed and presented using social-ecological systems theory, examines the dynamics of ecological citizenship in southwest Yukon and how they have been shaped by formal and informal institutions over time. Results have indicated the importance of addressing human-based components across all scales, whereby internal virtues are shaped by elements closer to home: community values, education, and time spent on the land; and external behaviours are often affected by systemic structures and institutions. Systemic and institutional elements are considered to play a positive role when they foster participation, awareness, and/or a culture of respect. The highest results are believed to be achieved when a culture of environmentalism is reflected in all social and institutional structures and brought together by a high-level integrated governance plan that utilizes democratic and community-oriented decision-making processes. i Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Scott Slocombe for supporting me in the process of completing this thesis. It has been a long journey for me, and he has always been kind, understanding, and supportive at every turn. Even during the periods when I retreated from writing, he offered just enough timely lecturing and/or conferencing opportunities to keep me continuously engaged and enthusiastic for the world of academia. I would like to thank the rest of the committee – Derek Armitage, Alex Latta, and Emily Huddart-Kennedy – for taking the time to read my work, ask thoughtful questions, and engage in some insightful discussion. In a short time, your questions and remarks have helped to evolve my thinking on this work and have helped to provide it with further direction and meaning. I am thankful to countless friends and family for always believing in me and offering many kind words of encouragement throughout this process. I would like to extend a special thanks to a few individuals who were a part of this journey at crucial points, and who may not realize how important their contributions truly were: Russ Christianson, Matthew King, Corey Grant, Doug McRae, and Barry Colbert. Your support of me in and out of this process, either professionally or personally, were directly tied to my ability to follow this work through to completion. To the Yukon and the many Yukoners that I met while there, I do not have the words to express how crucial you were in shaping my life. I will never forget the years that surrounded my research. I have never felt so myself, as I did in your world. The conversations and experiences that were shared there have become foundational building blocks for who I am today. And for that, I am forever grateful. ii Of course, a many great thanks to the granting agencies and financial programs that allowed me to complete this remote and distant research: WLU Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, Dr. John McMurry Research Chair in Environmental Geography (Scott Slocombe), and the Northern Scientific Training Grants Program. And again to Dr. Slocombe, for being a crucial component to accessing them. Finally, to my son Theo, for coming along at just the right time, and providing me the added inspiration to get back to the things that matter to me. You have refueled me with a new purpose and understanding for why the good fight is worth it, and you fill me with enough joy and compassion to finally approach it in the right way. iii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. x Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Thesis Goal ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Theoretical Context .......................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Research Methodology and Methods ............................................................................... 4 1.5 Case Study Overview ....................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Outline of Thesis .............................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 2: Literature Review ...................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Sustainability and Environmental Discourse ................................................................... 9 2.1.1 Defining Sustainability ........................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Early Sustainability Discourse ................................................................................ 11 2.1.3 Sustainability Evolved ............................................................................................ 15 2.1.4 Values-Based Discourses ........................................................................................ 19 2.2 Ecological Citizenship.................................................................................................... 24 2.2.1 Addressing Ecological Well-being through the “Citizenship” Lens ...................... 24 2.2.2 Defining Ecological Citizenship ............................................................................. 26 2.2.3 Utilizing “Ecological Citizenship” in Practice ....................................................... 29 2.2.4 Summary of Literature, Gaps and Opportunities .................................................... 32 2.3 Social-Ecological Systems & Environmental Governance ............................................ 34 2.3.1 Social-Ecological Systems Theory ......................................................................... 35 2.3.2 Resilience, Transformation, & Change ................................................................... 42 2.3.3 Environmental Governance .................................................................................... 46 2.3.4 Citizen-centered Approaches to Governance.......................................................... 49 2.4 Chapter Summary ........................................................................................................... 52 Chapter 3: Methodology and Methods ..................................................................................... 54 3.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 54 3.1.1 Goals, Objectives, and Research Questions ............................................................ 54 3.1.2 Perspective of Analysis ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Anarchist Studies
    Contemporary Anarchist Studies This volume of collected essays by some of the most prominent academics studying anarchism bridges the gap between anarchist activism on the streets and anarchist theory in the academy. Focusing on anarchist theory, pedagogy, methodologies, praxis, and the future, this edition will strike a chord for anyone interested in radical social change. This interdisciplinary work highlights connections between anarchism and other perspectives such as feminism, queer theory, critical race theory, disability studies, post- modernism and post-structuralism, animal liberation, and environmental justice. Featuring original articles, this volume brings together a wide variety of anarchist voices whilst stressing anarchism’s tradition of dissent. This book is a must buy for the critical teacher, student, and activist interested in the state of the art of anarchism studies. Randall Amster, J.D., Ph.D., professor of Peace Studies at Prescott College, publishes widely in areas including anarchism, ecology, and social movements, and is the author of Lost in Space: The Criminalization, Globalization , and Urban Ecology of Homelessness (LFB Scholarly, 2008). Abraham DeLeon, Ph.D., is an assistant professor at the University of Rochester in the Margaret Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development. His areas of interest include critical theory, anarchism, social studies education, critical pedagogy, and cultural studies. Luis A. Fernandez is the author of Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti- Globalization Movement (Rutgers University Press, 2008). His interests include protest policing, social movements, and the social control of late modernity. He is a professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Northern Arizona University. Anthony J. Nocella, II, is a doctoral student at Syracuse University and a professor at Le Moyne College.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecofeminist Explorations
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 Ecofeminist explorations Janet Henderson The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Henderson, Janet, "Ecofeminist explorations" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5360. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5360 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mike and Maureen MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. , COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author’s written consent. University of MOTfisumc ECOFEMINIST EXPLORATIONS B y Janet Henderson B. A., Furman University, 1985 Presented in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1990 Approved by Chair, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School UMI Number: EP40824 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these-will be-noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Ecology and Degrowth in Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Leipzig, 2014
    Political Ecology and Degrowth in Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Leipzig, 2014. Michalis Theodoropoulos, MSc. Marine and Coastal Management Abstract Degrowth lays at the foundation of Political Ecology and provides a radical political discourse that differentiates Political Ecology from the Left. Degrowth is like a consciousness mirror for Political Ecology as it reflects the theoretical (grass)roots of the ecological movement and provide a new impetus in order for ecology to regain some of its missing glamor and determined political activism. This paper argues that Political Ecology and Degrowth are a strategic way forward to address the challenges of the current multifaceted crisis and to provide a blue-print for future sustainability and survival of the species detached from the imaginary of growth. Keywords: Political Ecology; Degrowth; Crisis Exit Strategy; Green movement Narrative Step: Facing the current crisis “If we do not dare the impossible, we shall be faced with the unthinkable” The ecology of freedom, Murray Bookchin Degrowth is the backbone of political ecology and political ecology is at the core of degrowth. Political Ecology was born, as a movement and at academic level, already by the 1960s but expanded mainly during the 1970s, through a holistic critique on growth, productivism and consumerism, in relation to the carrying capacity (natural limits) of the planet, as well as, in relation to the environmental crisis which had already begun to emerge. Matters such as pollution and water quality, nuclear energy, desertification and protection of biodiversity, chemical agriculture and the effects on human health, living conditions in the cities and overpopulation, began to enter public debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Jayne Glover FINAL SUBMISSION
    “A COMPLEX AND DELICATE WEB”: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SELECTED SPECULATIVE NOVELS BY MARGARET ATWOOD, URSULA K. LE GUIN, DORIS LESSING AND MARGE PIERCY Thesis Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Rhodes University By Jayne Ashleigh Glover December 2007 Abstract This thesis examines selected speculative novels by Margaret Atwood, Ursula K. Le Guin, Doris Lessing and Marge Piercy. It argues that a specifiable ecological ethic can be traced in their work – an ethic which is explored by them through the tensions between utopian and dystopian discourses. The first part of the thesis begins by theorising the concept of an ecological ethic of respect for the Other through current ecological philosophies, such as those developed by Val Plumwood. Thereafter, it contextualises the novels within the broader field of science fiction, and speculative fiction in particular, arguing that the shift from a critical utopian to a critical dystopian style evinces their changing treatment of this ecological ethic within their work. The remainder of the thesis is divided into two parts, each providing close readings of chosen novels in the light of this argument. Part Two provides a reading of Le Guin’s early Hainish novels, The Left Hand of Darkness , The Word for World is Forest and The Dispossessed , followed by an examination of Piercy’s Woman on the Edge of Time , Lessing’s The Marriages Between Zones Three, Four and Five , and Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale . The third, and final, part of the thesis consists of individual chapters analysing the later speculative novels of each author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Environment: the Dialectics of Social and Environmental Change*
    THE NATURE OF ENVIRONMENT: THE DIALECTICS OF SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE* David Harvey I Prologue Around 'Earthday' 1970, I recall reading a special issue of the business journal Fortune on the environment. It celebrated the rise of the environ- mental issue as a 'non-class issue' and President Nixon, in an invited editorial, opined that future generations would judge us entirely by the quality of environment they inherited. On 'Earthday' itself, I attended a campus rally in Baltimore and heard several rousing speeches, mostly by middle class white radicals, attacking the lack of concern for the qualities of the air we breathed, the water we drank, the food we consumed and lamenting the materialist and consumerist approach to the world which was producing all manner of resource depletion and environmental degra- dation. The following day I went to the Left Bank Jazz club, a popular spot frequented by African-American families in Baltimore. The musicians interspersed their music with interactive commentary over the deteriorat- ing state of the environment. They talked about lack of jobs, poor housing, racial discrimination, crumbling cities, culminating in the claim, which sent the whole place into paroxysms of cheering, that their main environ- mental problem was President Richard Nixon. What struck me at the time, and what continues to strike me, is that the 'environmental issue' necessarily means such different things to different people, that in aggregate it encompasses quite literally everything there is. Business leaders worry about the political and legal environment, politi- cians worry about the economic environment, city dwellers worry about "This text was first presented in embryo at the Havens Center in the University of Wisconsin and as Ida Beam Visiting Fellow in the University of Iowa in March, 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development in a Complex World Phd Thesis
    Sustainable Development in a Complex World PhD Thesis Alex Robert Trisoglio University College London 1996 B1gL. LONDILuwy. Abstract The thesis examines the development of theoretical models and practical tools for understanding and making decisions regarding sustainable development (SD) in a complex world. It seeks to answer three questions: What is the meaning of SD in a complex world? What are the implications for our policies and institutions? • What tools can we use to assist decision-making for SD in a complex world? The thesis examines these issues by bringing together thinking and research within complex systems theory, cultural theory and management theory. It also draws on the environmental and SD literatures, which are in turn associated with several disciplines including geography, economics and environmental science. The thesis is in four parts: The first part explores the diversity of SD definitions and the two main policy models for SD. It identifies the need for a theoretical explanation of the plurality of perspectives in the SD debate, and also for an integration of insights from complexity theory into SD definitions and policy models. The second part introduces complexity theory and cultural theory, and examines how they can support development of an improved understanding of sustainability. The third part applies complexity theory and cultural theory to analyse SD policies. It argues that these theories yield significant new insights about sustainability, including highlighting the importance of plurality and resilience in policy making for sustainability. The final part explores how the theories and tools developed by management science can be applied to sustainability, especially in increasing the plurality and resilience of SD decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 12 Global Issues: Citizenship and Sustainability Course Overview
    Introduction Course Rationale State of the Planet Although Earth is 4.6 billion years old, human beings have been around for just a small fraction of that time—about 250,000 years. In that time, somewhere between 60 and 110 billion people have lived on this planet, civilizations have come and gone, and Earth has continued to nourish and sustain life. Until recently, we have not paid a great deal of attention to the impact of human activity on the state of the planet, nor have we paid adequate attention to the needs of our fellow humans. In recent years, people have watched with increasing concern as significant environmental changes have become more apparent. We are beginning to realize that these changes may be the result of human activity—and, even worse, that our future on Earth is no longer certain. The 20th century was the beginning of global efforts to improve human quality of life by working toward collective social goals. For example, in 1948 the United Nations Declaration of Universal Human Rights marked a significant turning point in concern for the dignity of all human beings, and in the year 2000 the UN established the Millennium Development Goals to improve life for people across the globe. Although some progress has been made, if we are to improve the human condition and sustain Earth for future generations, more work must be done. We cannot continue along the path we are on. We need to change the way we live, reconnect to the natural world, develop an ethos based on ecological thinking and global concern, and teach our children to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Karmic Ecology: Lessons from the Jain Dharma
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Trumpeter - Journal of Ecosophy (Athabasca University) Karmic Ecology: Lessons from the Jain Dharma By Aidan Rankin Why Karma Matters One who neglects or disregards the existence of earth, air, fire, water and vegetation disregards his own existence which is entwined with them. Mahavira, twenty-fourth Tirthankara (Path-Finder) of Jainism No religion of the World has explained the principle of Ahimsa [non-violence] so deeply and systematically as discussed, with its applicability in life, in Jainism. As and when this benevolent principle of Ahimsa will be sought for practice by the people of the world to achieve their ends of life in this world and beyond, Jainism is sure to have the uppermost status and Bhagwan Mahavira is sure to be respected as the greatest authority on Ahimsa. Mohandas K. Gandhi The idea of karma as cosmic pervades Indic spiritual philosophy and is one of its distinguishing characteristics. Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs and Jains all accord high status to this concept and place it at the heart of their respective doctrine and practice. Approaches to karma vary between, and within, these faith traditions. The difference is more one of angle and emphasis than ideology. Karma influences secular values and secular men and women too, in India and outside it, often to the point of caricature and cliché. At a deeper level, there have also been calls for the ‘Christening’ or ‘re-Christening’ of karma. This can either be seen as adding a new and vital element to Christian teachings (which have roots as deep in parts of India as in Europe), or returning Christianity to its essence, its true ‘fundamentals’.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Philosophies in Education: Connie Russell
    5 EDUC 5650 (Spring 2016, online) COURSE TITLE Environmental Philosophies in Education Instructor Connie Russell, PhD Office Hours Meetings by appointment (in person in BL 1026, by phone at 807.343.8049, or via SKype) Email [email protected] CALENDAR DESCRIPTION An examination of historical and contemporary environmental philosophies found primarily in Western traditions, including but not limited to animal rights, deep ecology, ecofeminism, environmental ethics, and environmental justice. The theoretical and practical implications of these for education will be explored. COURSE OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES An exploration of environmental philosophies opens up questions about how we, as humans, relate to nature, the land, and other life, how we should relate to the more-than-human, and what visions we might hold and actions we might taKe for our common future on Earth. In this course, it is intended that you will: Take control of your own learning and personalize a course of study that is authentic and aids your own professional and personal growth. What are you hoping to learn and do in this course, and beyond? Participate actively, listen fully, and be open to learning with and from peers so that we can create a learning environment in which we can all safely contribute insights from our professional and personal experiences. Challenge yourself as a learner and an educator, within the course itself and beyond. Develop a breadth and depth of understanding of the various ways in which various environmental philosophies have been taKen up, or could be taKen up, in education. Critically examine the underlying assumptions of various environmental philosophies, including diverse and contested positions on human/nature and human/animal relationships, the ways in which anthropocentrism intersects with racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism, and sizeism, and how these impact educational theories, practices, and research Identify those philosophies that resonate most strongly with your own beliefs, values, and contexts, and why.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending the Earth: a Debate
    Defending the Earth: A Debate Murray Bookchin and Dave Foreman 1991 Contents Foreword: Turning Debate Into Dialogue by David Levine, Founder and Director, The Learning Alliance 3 Introduction: Whither the Radical Ecology Movement? by Steve Chase 7 Part I: The Dialogue — Winter 1989 20 Chapter 1: Looking for Common Ground 21 Chapter 2: Ecology and the Left 34 Chapter 3: Radical Visions and Strategies 44 Chapter 4: Racism and the Future of the Movement 59 Part II: Closing Essays — One Year Later 70 Chapter 5: Second Thoughts of an Eco-Warrior by Dave Foreman 71 Chapter 6: Where I Stand Now by Murray Bookchin 80 2 Foreword: Turning Debate Into Dialogue by David Levine, Founder and Director, The Learning Alliance This small but important book grows out of “The Great Debate.” That’s what — for monthsin advance — many environmental activists around the country called the first public meeting be- tween social ecology theorist Murray Bookchin and deep ecology activist Dave Foreman. Most expected political fireworks at the joint talk organized in November 1989 by the Learning Al- liance, New York City’s alternative education and action organization. Given the confrontational rhetoric and the all-too-frequent name-calling that has character- ized the volatile political debate between various advocates of “social ecology” and “deep ecology,” the expectation of sparks flying was quite understandable. Over the last few years, the radical ecology movement has been torn by bitter ideological divisions. One of the most serious divisions, and certainly the one which has received the most play in the media, has been between “deep” and “social” ecology — between a “biocentric” philosophy which makes protecting the welfare of the wilderness the most essential human project and a left-libertarian “ecological humanist” philosophy which sees radical social transformation as the main key to defending the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis, Movements, Counter-Hegemony: in Search of the New1
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 2 (2): 168 - 198 (November 2010) Carroll, Crisis, movements, counter-hegemony Crisis, movements, counter-hegemony: in search of the new1 William K Carroll Abstract This article argues that humanity’s prospects in the 21st century hinge on the creation of a counter-hegemonic historical bloc within which practices and social visions capable of fashioning a post-capitalist economic democracy begin to flourish. The organic crisis of neoliberal capitalism creates openings for such a breakthrough; the deepening ecological crisis renders such a breakthrough an urgent necessity. The analytical challenge pursued here is to discern, in the contemporary conjuncture, elements of practice that might weld the present to an alternative future. How can new movement practices and sensibilities can be pulled into a historical bloc – an ensemble of social relations and human agency for democratic socialism; how might that bloc move on the terrain of civil society, and vis-à-vis states, opening spaces for practices that prefigure a post-capitalist world? These questions are too big for a single paper; the objective here is to show how a Gramscian problematic furnishes us with an analytical and strategic lens that can illuminate practical answers. Introduction Since the global financial meltdown of 2008 and the failure of the 2009 Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change (COP15) to reach a meaningful accord, it has become increasingly clear that a profound economic and ecological crisis is facing humanity. Crisis, as the ancient Chinese proverb says, presents a combination of threat and opportunity. It is a time of danger yet also of new possibilities, as received wisdoms and unreflective practices become open to challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Content and Process of Women's Decision-Making Viewed Through
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 1999 The onC tent And Process Of Women’s Decision- Making Viewed Through The Lenses of Feminine/ Feminist Ethics And Roman Catholicism Nancy Parent Bancroft Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, Sociology Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bancroft, Nancy Parent, "The onC tent And Process Of Women’s Decision-Making Viewed Through The Lenses of Feminine/Feminist Ethics And Roman Catholicism" (1999). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 668. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/668 This Open-Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. THE CONTENT AND PROCESS OF WOMEN’S DECISION-MAKING VIEWED THROUGH THE LENSES OF FEMININE/FEMINIST ETHICS AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM By Nancy Parent Bancroft B.A. Marillac College, 1973 M.A. Loyola University, 1975 C.A.S. St. Michael’s College, 1995 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Individualized in Ethics) The Graduate School University of Maine May 1999 Advisory Committee: Jean Symonds, Associate Professor of Nursing and Coordinator of RN Studies, Advisor Jeffrey Hecker, Associate Professor of Psychology Philip Keane, Professor of Moral Theology, St. Mary’s Seminary and University, Baltimore, MD Kristina Passman, Chairperson and Associate Professor of Classical Language and Literature Therese Shipps, Director and Associate Professor School of Nursing Erling Skorpen, Professor of Philosophy THE CONTENT AND PROCESS OF WOMEN’S DECISION-MAKING VIEWED THROUGH THE LENSES OF FEMININE/FEMINIST ETHICS AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM By Nancy Parent Bancroft Thesis Advisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]