The Case for Multilateralism: the Korean Peninsula in a Regional Context Niklas Swanström

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case for Multilateralism: the Korean Peninsula in a Regional Context Niklas Swanström Focus Asia Perspective & Analysis June 2020 The Case for Multilateralism: The Korean Peninsula in a Regional Context Niklas Swanström In the absence of a formal regional security framework in Northeast Asia, recent years have seen an almost exclusive focus on summit-driven bilateral diplomacy on the Korean Peninsula, most notably the first ever meeting between incumbent leaders of the U.S. and North Korea in Singapore in June 2018. However, bilateral approaches have also been prone to stalemate and risk excluding important stakeholders and issues regarding peace and security on the Peninsula. While outlining the challenges to doing so, this essay makes the case for multilateral mechanisms and frameworks to complement bilateral exchanges. Series on Peacebuilding on the Korean Peninsula This essay is part of an ongoing series by ISDP’s Korea Center to provide different perspectives on peacebuilding on the Korean Penin- sula. In so doing, it recognizes that peacebuilding is a long-term process and involves different dimensions, from the diplomatic and military to economic and societal. Introduction With the exception of the ultimately failed Six-Party Talks (2003-09), the main focus of nuclear-related The Korean Peninsula remains an enduring conflict negotiations and agreements have been bilateral in hotspot and security challenge. Since the end of the nature, notably the 1994 Agreed Framework and the Korean War in 1953, efforts to build a sustainable short-lived so-called 2012 Leap Day Deal between peace have been thwarted amidst a long history North Korea and the United States.1 However, of tension, aggression, and broken promises; this breakthroughs have often failed to survive political despite periods of temporarily improved relations transitions, geopolitical shifts, and the challenges of and détente. Conflict resolution impulses have been implementation. further hampered by the complexities of geostrategic tensions and power rivalry in the wider Northeast This is not least true today when the promising Asian region amidst the enduring absence of any bilateral contacts between President Trump and formal regional security structure. Chairman Kim, as well as the leaders of the two Koreas, initiated in 2018, have not been sustained 1 Focus Asia Perspective & Analysis The Case for Multilateralism: June 2020 The Korean Peninsula in a Regional Context and negotiations have stalemated. This points, in part, to the fragility of relying on bilateral diplomacy alone. The Institute for Security and Development Policy is an independent, non-partisan research and policy organization Accordingly, the points of departure in this essay are based in Stockholm dedicated to expanding understanding the regional security dynamics in Northeast Asia, of international affairs. the need to see the Korean Peninsula in a regional For enquiries, please contact: [email protected] context, and why this necessitates multilateral No parts of this paper may be reproduced without ISDP’s frameworks and regional security initiatives to permission. complement bilateral exchanges. It then reviews Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this paper are those of previous attempts to establish such structures, the author only and do not necessarily reflect those of ISDP what they achieved, but also what limitations and or its sponsors. challenges they faced. Finally, some lessons and principles are put forward on how future frameworks may be adopted. Intermediate Nuclear Forces treaty (INF) between Regional Security Dynamics the United States and Russia could also exacerbate the situation if the U.S. decides to deploy intermediate- The region of Northeast Asia, here defined as Russia, range ballistic missiles in the region in response to China, Japan, North and South Korea, as well as China and North Korea.5 the U.S. due to its strategic interests in the region, remains a security hotspot. Conflict dynamics The rise of an increasingly economically and militarily include unresolved territorial and maritime disputes, assertive China also poses security implications for its historical enmities combined with nationalism worried neighbors. Increasing militarization amidst and militarism, as well as geopolitical competition a conventional arms race between countries does not between the United States and China; and to a lesser bode well for multilateral security cooperation and extent Russia. reducing threat perceptions.6 Despite the relatively positive economic cooperation The trade war and growing U.S.-China geostrategic and interdependence between regional states competition means that Japan and South Korea (excepting North Korea), this has not translated face the dilemma of balancing relations with both into overarching political and security cooperation. powers while being pressured to side with their U.S. This is what has come to be referred to as the so- ally.7 Yet at the same time, under an erratic Trump called “Asian Paradox.”2 Instead, security has been administration in the White House, doubts have maintained through military deterrence and bilateral grown over U.S. alliance commitments to South security alliances rather than through collective Korea and Japan’s security.8 security arrangements, which remain undeveloped. While a decades-long feature of the politico-security Great power competition, furthermore, lessens landscape in Northeast Asia, it is presently in flux.3 the incentives for cooperation between China and the U.S. on Korean Peninsula issues, whereby the North Korea’s de facto nuclear weapons status Peninsula instead turns into a theater for strategic has long-term implications and increases the calls confrontation.9 North Korea is adept at exploiting in South Korea and Japan to also acquire their the gaps between the parties to its own advantage, own nuclear weapons.4 Thus there is the very real thus reducing the pressure on it to denuclearize. potential of a nuclear arms race developing in the region if efforts for North Korea’s denuclearization At the same time, the past decade has seen an do not succeed. Moreover, the abrogation of the increasing appreciation for the interrelated nature of 2 Focus Asia Perspective & Analysis The Case for Multilateralism: June 2020 The Korean Peninsula in a Regional Context the region’s economic, energy, security, climate, and Bilateral talks between the U.S. and North Korea are environmental challenges.10 Shared challenges can essential for addressing nuclear and security concerns be recast as shared opportunities which necessitate on the Korean Peninsula. Inter-Korean relations are platforms for dialogue, cooperation, and integration also important for addressing these issues as well as at the regional level. promoting reconciliation. However, any sustainable peace and denuclearization process needs to encompass While these trends and dynamics may spur, and a broader range of stakeholders and regional issues. necessitate, constructive initiatives to create a new security architecture, they may also dangerously destabilize the region, raising the prospect of Any sustainable peace increased competition and conflict. Accordingly, and denuclearization the security situation on the Korean Peninsula is both influenced by wider regional dynamics as well process needs to as influences in the regional security environment. encompass a broader Peace and security on the Korean Peninsula cannot be considered outside of the wider Northeast Asian, range of stakeholders and indeed, global context. and regional issues. Beyond Bilateralism A formal end to the Korean War through the signing In the absence of a relevant multilateral framework, of a peace treaty would require at a minimum the the most recent phase of negotiations on the Korean participation of the United States, China, and Peninsula since 2018 has been characterized by North Korea as original signatories of the Armistice bilateral summit-driven diplomacy between the Agreement, as well as arguably South Korea. Any such different actors. This has included summits between treaty would furthermore potentially entail significant the United States and North Korea, South and North modifications in the posture and purpose of the U.S. Korea, China and North Korea, as well as North security alliance with South Korea, such as a reduction Korea and Russia. Japanese premier Shinzo Abe is in U.S. military personnel, removing strategic assets presently the only regional leader to have not met with away from the Peninsula, or reconfiguring military Kim Jong Un.11 These summits produced positive exercises.14 outcomes in the form of the Singapore Statement between the U.S. and North Korea in June 2018 as All regional actors have a stake in North Korea’s well as the two inter-Korean agreements, leading to an denuclearization as well as the status of its other overall reduction in tensions.12 weapons of mass destruction and conventional missile capabilities. The consequences of a failure, or indeed These accomplishments, however, do not guarantee success, in securing the denuclearization of North any lasting stability as relations are currently “stuck” Korea, are thus very much of regional and even in a bilateral structure that risks stalemating between international importance. uncompromising demands and personal agendas. The high stakes of bilateral summits were exposed at The lifting of sanctions on North Korea, furthermore, the second Hanoi Summit between President Trump and the provision of humanitarian and economic and Chairman Kim in February 2019. Failure to aid, requires
Recommended publications
  • South Korea Section 3
    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea's Economic Engagement Toward North Korea
    South Korea’s Economic Engagement toward North Korea Lee Sangkeun & Moon Chung-in 226 | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies On February 10, 2016, the South Korean government announced the closure of the Gaeseong Industrial Complex, a symbol of its engagement policy and inter-Korean rapprochement. The move was part of its proactive, unilateral sanctions against North Korea’s fourth nuclear test in January and rocket launch in February.1 Pyongyang reciprocated by expelling South Korean personnel working in the industrial complex and declaring it a military control zone.2 Although the May 24, 2010 measure following the sinking of the Cheonan naval vessel significantly restricted inter-Korea exchanges and cooperation, the Seoul government spared the Gaeseong complex. With its closure, however, inter-Korean economic relations came to a complete halt, and no immediate signs of revival of Seoul’s economic engagement with the North can be detected. This chapter aims at understanding the rise and decline of this engagement with North Korea by comparing the progressive decade of Kim Dae-jung (KDJ) and Roh Moo-hyun (RMH) with the conservative era of Lee Myung-bak (LMB) and Park Geun-hye (PGH). It also looks to the future of inter-Korean relations by examining three plausible scenarios of economic engagement. Section one presents a brief overview of the genesis of Seoul’s economic engagement strategy in the early 1990s, section two examines this engagement during the progressive decade (1998-2007), and section three analyzes that of the conservative era (2008-2015). They are followed by a discussion of three possible outlooks on the future of Seoul’s economic engagement with Pyongyang.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Hierarchies, Genres of Management, and Shifting Control in South Korea’S Corporate World
    Ranks & Files: Corporate Hierarchies, Genres of Management, and Shifting Control in South Korea’s Corporate World by Michael Morgan Prentice A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Matthew Hull, Chair Associate Professor Juhn Young Ahn Professor Gerald F. Davis Associate Professor Michael Paul Lempert Professor Barbra A. Meek Professor Erik A. Mueggler Michael Morgan Prentice [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-2981-7850 © Michael Morgan Prentice 2017 Acknowledgments A doctoral program is inexorably linked to the document – this one – that summarizes the education, research, and development of a student and their ideas over the course of many years. The single authorship of such documents is often an aftereffect only once a text is completed. Indeed, while I have written all the words on these pages and am responsible for them, the influences behind the words extend to many people and places over the course of many years whose myriad contributions must be mentioned. This dissertation project has been generously funded at various stages. Prefield work research and coursework were funded through summer and academic year FLAS Grants from the University of Michigan, a Korea Foundation pre-doctoral fellowship, and a SeAH-Haiam Arts & Sciences summer fellowship. Research in South Korea was aided by a Korea Foundation Language Grant, a Fulbright-IIE Research grant, a Wenner-Gren Dissertation Fieldwork Grant, and a Rackham Centennial Award. The dissertation writing stage was supported by the Rackham Humanities fellowship, a Social Sciences Research Council Korean Studies Dissertation Workshop, and the Core University Program for Korean Studies through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2016-OLU-2240001).
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea: Defense White Paper 2010
    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Activities of the Past Three Years
    Truth and Reconciliation Activities of the Past Three Years CONTENTS President's Greeting I. Historical Background of Korea's Past Settlement II. Introduction to the Commission 1. Outline: Objective of the Commission 2. Organization and Budget 3. Introduction to Commissioners and Staff 4. Composition and Operation III. Procedure for Investigation 1. Procedure of Petition and Method of Application 2. Investigation and Determination of Truth-Finding 3. Present Status of Investigation 4. Measures for Recommendation and Reconciliation IV. Extra-Investigation Activities 1. Exhumation Work 2. Complementary Activities of Investigation V. Analysis of Verified Cases 1. National Independence and the History of Overseas Koreans 2. Massacres by Groups which Opposed the Legitimacy of the Republic of Korea 3. Massacres 4. Human Rights Abuses VI. MaJor Achievements and Further Agendas 1. Major Achievements 2. Further Agendas Appendices 1. Outline and Full Text of the Framework Act Clearing up Past Incidents 2. Frequently Asked Questions about the Commission 3. Primary Media Coverage on the Commission's Activities 4. Web Sites of Other Truth Commissions: Home and Abroad President's Greeting In entering the third year of operation, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea (the Commission) is proud to present the "Activities of the Past Three Years" and is thankful for all of the continued support. The Commission, launched in December 2005, has strived to reveal the truth behind massacres during the Korean War, human rights abuses during the authoritarian rule, the anti-Japanese independence movement, and the history of overseas Koreans. It is not an easy task to seek the truth in past cases where the facts have been hidden and distorted for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Korean Phonology and Morphology in a Derivational Approach
    Ecology of PF: A Study of Korean Phonology and Morphology in a Derivational Approach Inkie Chung, Ph.D. University of Connecticut, 2007 This dissertation studies the component of PF, i.e., morphology, phonology and phonetics, in Korean in a consistently derivational approach. Using phonological arguments and an acoustic phonetic study, chapter 2 identifies the surface syllable structure. It also recognizes the two syllable structure constraints: the complex onset constraint and the branching nucleus constraint. Using this syllable structure and these constraints, chapter 3 provides a comprehensive analysis of hiatus in verbal morphology and related issues within Calabrese’s (1995, 2002a) Dynamic Phonology framework. A limited number of actual outcomes for similar hiatus configurations show that the constraint-induced repairs are not finite but limited, and subject to the general principle of economy. It is shown that economy chooses shorter derivations over longer ones, when more than one derivation is possible and yield the same final outcome. It also show's that the hiatus constraint is a non-surface, cyclic constraint, operating once per morphophonological cycle. Furthermore, it argues that certain phonological operations must be described with the traditional rule-like formalism. It is also pointed out that the syllable structure constraints identified in chapter 2 are surface constraints. Chapters 4 and 5 provide a morphological study in Distributed Morphology (Bobaljik 2000, Halle and Marantz 1993, Marantz 2006) With verbal and adjectival roots exhibiting negative and honorific suppletion, these chapters identify the morphological structure of the inflected predicates (and hence phrase structure to a certain extent) in Korean. It identifies the paradoxical situation arising from the interaction of negative Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diaspora of Korean Children: a Cross-Cultural Study of the Educational Crisis in Contemporary South Korea
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2007 The Diaspora of Korean Children: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Educational Crisis in Contemporary South Korea Young-ee Cho The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cho, Young-ee, "The Diaspora of Korean Children: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Educational Crisis in Contemporary South Korea" (2007). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1244. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1244 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DIASPORA OF KOREAN CHILDREN: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF THE EDUCATIONAL CRISIS IN CONTEMPORARY SOUTH KOREA By Young-ee Cho B.A Economics / East Asian Languages and Cultures, Indiana University, 1986 M.B.A. International Marketing, Indiana University, 1988 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Montana Missoula, MT Summer 2007 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Roberta D. Evans, Chair School of Education Dr. C. LeRoy Anderson Dept of Sociology Dr. John C. Lundt Dept of Educational Leadership & Counseling Dr. William P. McCaw Dept of Educational Leadership & Counseling Dr. John C.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Implications of South Korean Military Spending
    February 2009 • Volume 4 • Number 2 Ploughshares into Swords: Economic Implications of South Korean Military Spending by John Feffer South Korea is currently engaged, once again, in a large- ple directly and more than 50,000 indirectly, and it accounts for scale, expensive modernization of its military that aims sales of roughly $5.7 billion, including more than $1 billion in to provide the country with a more robust and self-suffi - exports in 2008.2 These are not small fi gures. Yet, critics charge cient defense. The timing of this considerable increase in that government funds could be more profi tably invested in military spending might seem, at fi rst glance, rather odd. civilian sectors of the economy to better utilize research and Korean economic growth has been relatively anemic in development (R&D) funds and contribute more to economic the past few years. Meanwhile, the conventional military growth. The fl ip side of the economic argument—that a nation- power of its chief adversary, North Korea, has steadily al economic slowdown intensifi ed by a global recession neces- declined, and, until recently, South Korean leaders were sitates a less ambitious military modernization—has generated committed to expanding inter-Korean cooperation. In an- a different set of controversies concerning the sequencing of other irony, the current Lee Myung-bak administration defense reform and the allocation of scarce resources. has simultaneously pushed a much harder line on North Korea and reduced the level of spending projected by the This paper will explore these various controversies, which have previous Roh Moo-hyun government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hangul Characters
    The Korean language is classified as a member of the Ural-Altaic family (other members of this family include the Mongolian, Finnish, and Hungarian languages.) Until the early 1400s, most documents were written in classical Chinese characters (known in Korean as Hanja). As the idiographs are difficult to learn, only the educated people could read and write. King Sejong, the 4th ruler of the Joseon dynasty (1392-1910), set up a special committee of scholars in 1443 to create a new writing system specifically suited to the Korean language. The result was Hangul (meaning 'the one script'). It originally contained 28 symbols, although 4 have dropped out of use. The alphabet has 10 vowels and 14 consonants. The consonants represent the simplified outlines of the parts of the mouth and tongue used to pronounce them. The vowels are associated with elements of the philosophy of the Book of Changes. In 1994, Discovery magazine described Hangul as the most logical language writing system in the world. The simplicity of Hangul led Korea to become one of the most literate countries in the world. U.S. novelist Pearl Buck said that Hangul is the simplest writing system in the world and likenedKing Sejong to Leonardo da Vinci. Even though Hangul is a system of phonetic symbols, it is categorized as new level of feature system, the first and the only in the world. On Oct. 1, 1997, UNESCO designated Hunminjeongeum as world archive property. Koreans commemorate the creation of Hangul each year on October 9. The Hangul Characters Before you begin learning the language, you should take some time to practice writing Hangul.
    [Show full text]
  • Contentious Narratives on National Identity of South Korea: How to Understand the Self and the Significant Others
    Contentious Narratives on National Identity of South Korea: How to Understand the Self and the Significant Others, North Korea and the United States A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Ph.D. In the Department of Political and Social Sciences of the Freie Universität Berlin. Ji Young Heo Graduate School of East Asian Studies Berlin, 2020 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Eun-Jeung Lee Second Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Günther Maihold Date of the viva voce/defense: 30 April 2020 Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Eun-Jeung Lee for the useful comments, remarks and engagement through the whole process of this doctoral dissertation. I also want to thank Günther Maihold for valuable comments and Hannes B. Mosler for providing fortunate guidance throughout my year at the Graduate School of East Asian Studies (GEAS). A special thanks should go to Dr. Tae Yook Choi, the director of the institute for Korean Unification, History and Culture, and other researchers in the institute for their guidance and support during the field research in Seoul. I am also grateful for all the members of my GEAS cohort as well as friends from other cohorts who have been truly inspiring and supportive. Lastly, I would like to thank my loved family, mom, dad, Ji-hye, Jung-yeol, and In-sung for their love and supports. Thank you my Lord for walking with me all the time. Abstract At the time of writing, the expectation for a peace settlement on the Korean peninsula is greater than ever due to ongoing inter-Korean summits as well as the historic encounters between the two leaders of the US and North Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCIDENTAL ACTIVISTS: HOW VICTIM GROUPS HOLD the GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE in JAPAN and SOUTH KOREA by Celeste Louise Arrington A
    ACCIDENTAL ACTIVISTS: HOW VICTIM GROUPS HOLD THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE IN JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREA By Celeste Louise Arrington A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Steven K. Vogel, Chair Professor T.J. Pempel Professor Ron E. Hassner Professor Kim Voss (sociology) Fall 2010 ACCIDENTAL ACTIVISTS: HOW VICTIM GROUPS HOLD THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE IN JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREA © 2010 By: Celeste Louise Arrington ABSTRACT Accidental Activists: How Victim Groups Hold the Government Accountable in Japan and South Korea by Celeste Louise Arrington Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Steven K. Vogel, Chair Scholars suggest that we are experiencing an “age of apology,” as governments atone for past wrongs and citizens hold their leaders more accountable. Yet why would a government ever apologize and grant redress for harmful policies? Since policy-makers are usually loath to admit mistakes or wrongdoing, the people harmed sometimes must engage in collective action to obtain redress. Government responses to such victim groups range from comprehensive redress to negotiated settlements, in which the state disavows any responsibility for the victimization. Redress may come rapidly to some but take decades for others. What explains such differences in the extent and timing of state responsiveness to victim groups’ demands for redress? Victim redress organizations lack the standard resources needed to influence policy- makers: money, access, and votes. Understanding why victims can be powerful requires determining when they are more or less powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol.46AUTUMN 2019
    K O R E A N HERITAGE K O R E A N HERITAGE Cultural Heritage Administration www.koreanheritage.kr ISSN 2005-0151 Government Publications Registration Number 11-1550000-000639-08 KOREAN AUTUMN 2019 HERITAGE VOL. 46 AUTUMN 2019 Vol. 46 2019 Vol. AUTUMN Cultural Heritage Administration Cultural ON THE COVER Quarterly Magazine of the Cultural Heritage Administration CONTENTS AUTUMN Vol. 46 KOREAN 02 Featured HERITAGE 02 CURATOR'S SELECTION The Queen’s Loving Heart Delivered in Hangul Date of Publication 08 KOREAN FOOD September 5, 2019 Hanji, or Korean paper, is crafted through a laborious process of steaming, pounding, Rice, the Enduring Staple Food of Koreans Published by and drying the fibers of mulberry trees. The oldest surviving woodblock print in the 08 Cultural Heritage Administration Republic of Korea world, the Pure Light Dharani Sutra, was made with this traditional Korean paper. 16 HUMAN TREASURES Publication Management Enshrined in a stone pagoda, the Buddhist text was discovered in a nearly intact form an amazing 1,300 years after its creation, demonstrating the remarkable Director of International Cooperation Division Hanji Records Textures durability of Korean paper. The front cover shows sheets of Korean paper crafted Content Coordination using traditional methods by Master Hong Chun-soo. This hanji is characterized Kim Byung-yun, Cho Ha-young by its natural hues and warm but strong textures. Paper manufactured by Hansol 26 LOCAL HERITAGE GUIDE Translation Paper using state-of-the-art technology is featured on the back cover. In this digital A Heritage Walk on an Autumn Night Park Jung-eun age when a paperless world is widely predicted, Hansol Paper is working under the Copy Editing motto “Good paper is inspiring.” Drawing on its strong belief in paper, the Korean Bill Sharp papermaking company is making its utmost efforts to create contemporary products that reflect the knowledge and wisdom embodied by traditional papermaking.
    [Show full text]