Golden Algae an Invading Toxic Protist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Golden Algae an Invading Toxic Protist Golden Algae An Invading Toxic Protist Karen Glenn Bluestem Chapter – Texas Master Naturalist Austin College – Department of Chemistry Scientist III - University of Oklahoma Biological Station (2007 – 2011) Texas Master Naturalist Annual Meeting October 19, 2019 – Rockwall, Texas What exactly is Golden Alga? • Golden algae is not considered a “true” alga. There are approximately 1000 species of Chrysophytes that are collectively referred to as “golden algae” due to the coloring of the water during an active bloom events. • Kingdom Protista (Five Kingdom System) or Chromista (Seven Kingdom System) – simple eukaryotic organisms Not a plant, animal, or fungi Usually found in an aquatic environment Usually single celled organisms, but may sometimes be multicellular Often have flagella or cilia for movement May be heterotrophs (saprotrophy and phagotrophy) or autotrophs (photosynthesis) Historically grouped with Protozoa, Slime Molds, Sporozoans such as Giardia and Plasmodia, and Amoebas May have the ability to form cysts and/or practice allelopathy when conditions are unfavorable The Five Kingdom System Illustration by Robert G. Howells, TPWD Golden Alga – Prymnesium parvum Characteristics: Single-celled marine species – prefers a saline environment Haptophyta – prominent haptonema, a microtubular appendage Two uneven flagella – provides locomotion Photosynthetic – two prominent chloroplasts Submicroscopic organic scales – requires an electron microscope Golden Algae cannot be detected without magnification due to its size! The Scandinavian Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa at the University of Copenhagen A microscopic picture of a golden alga cell (1000X magnification). Photo by Greg Southard, TPWD Cells average ~ 10 micrometers (range from 8 to 15 micrometers). (For comparison the thickness of a human hair averages around 90 micrometers.) P. parvum was first identified by Liebert and Deerns during a 1920 fish kill in the Netherlands. Liebert F, Deerns WM. Onderzoek naar de oorzak van een Vischsterfte in den Polder Workumer Nieuwland, nabij Workum. Verhandungen en Rapporten uitgegeven door Rijkinstituten voor Visscherijonderzoek. 1920;1:81–93. P. parvum was confirmed in 5 separate water sheds within Texas in the 1980’s. Note: not all watersheds have experienced fish kills. First confirmed appearance in 1985 in the Pecos River watershed, although earlier fish kills may have been caused by P. parvum. Responsible for an estimated 30-50 million dollar loss to recreation and aquaculture industries in affected areas. Dundee State Fish Hatchery’s striped bass production wiped out in 2001 due to using contaminated lake water. Since the first confirmed arrival of P. parvum, it has been reported in 20 states, and has recently been confirmed in the Rio Grande, San Jacinto and Wichita river watersheds. States Reporting P. parvum Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. Texas Parks and Wildlife Where Did Golden Algae Come From? “Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects” – Baas Becking hypothesis (1934) • P. parvum has always been here in very small numbers until environmental factors favored an increase in its number to detectable (and harmful) limits. • Bilge water from transport ships • Bird guano and possibly feathers • Transfer of resting cysts in sediment • Boats and live wells • Bottom line: no one knows how it first got here, but it is probably a mixture of all the above Confirmed P. Pa r vu m Fish Kills in Lake Texoma First fish kill in Lake Texoma occurred in Jan – Mar of 2004. Density was approximately 144,000 cells mL-1. Bloom was sporadic with fish kills mostly observed in Lebanon Pool and the mouth of the Big Mineral arm. No kills were observed in 2005, but subsequent kills observed 2006 and 2007 (and beyond). Most of the latter kills have been in Lebanon Pool. Full time monitoring program began in Feb 2006 at the University of Oklahoma Biological Station, funded Image: David Hambright, Lebanon Pool Fish Kill, 2004. by the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation. Plankton Ecology and Limnology Lab (PELL) – University of Oklahoma Biological Station Detecting and Monitoring P. parvum (PELL) Direct cell counts – requires ability to visually detect and count cells under a microscope • Very labor intensive! • Limits of approximately 333-1000 cells/ mL Cell counts with a Flow Cytometer – uses cell’s ability to self-fluoresce vs. size to count cells. • Fast, relatively easy. • Possibility of other cells being counted as target. • Can sometimes be difficult with mobile species (migrate away from “sipper”) Cell counts with qPCR – using specific DNA sequences to detect and quantify algal cells in water samples. • Specific, depending on primers used • Ability to detect very low concentrations (~ 6 - 22 cells/mL, depending on volume of water sampled) • Quick and repeatable • Early detection of low densities • Requires knowledge of copy number for sequence used (how many copies of the sequence are in each cell) Zamor,R.M.; Glenn, K.L.; Hambright, K.D.. 2012. Incorporating molecular tools into routine HAB monitoring programs: Using qPCR to track invasive Prymnesium. Harmful Algae 15, 1-7. Lake Texoma Monitoring (PELL) Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations • Nutrient loads are critical in understanding water quality. • Common ratio of Nitrogen:Phosphorus (N:P) is ~ 16:1 in nature. • N:P ratio varies across sample sites in Lake Texoma. Conductivity • Specific conductivity ranged from 887.6 µS/cm to 3,062 µS/cm, indicating high levels of current conducting ions (chlorides and salts) in the system. • These values are highest within the upper reservoir arms, notability the Red River, and generally decline moving towards the dam. Washita Arm has low conductivity. Salinity • Values ranged from 0.30 ppt in the Washita River arm to 1.70 ppt in the Red River arm. • Texoma has much higher salt content compared to other Oklahoma reservoirs. Chlorophyll • Total chlorophyll can give an idea of algal concentrations, although it is a general measure and cannot give information about species. Hambright, K.D., R.M. Zamor, J.D. Easton, K.G. Looper, E.J. Remmel, & A.C. Easton. 2010. Dynamics of an invasive toxigenic protist in a subtropical reservoir. Harmful Algae 9:568–577. What Causes Golden Algae to Bloom? Nutrient loads – Blooms are associated with changes in the nutrient levels in the water. There have been differences among studies, but generally the ratio of Nitrogen (N) to Phosphorus (P) plays a role. • P. parvum tends to bloom under high N and high P conditions. • When the environment becomes P-limited, P. Parvum becomes more toxic. • Upper Red River ratio of N:P is ~ 11:1, Washita Arm is ~17:1. • Texoma is classified as a P-limited, eutrophic lake. (Washita Arm is mesotrophic) pH – P. parvum growth is optimized at ~ pH 8 • Lake Texoma pH ranges from ~ 7.4 to 8.5, depending on inflow and conditions. What Causes Golden Algae to Bloom? Salinity – P. parvum can tolerate a wide range of salinities from 1 – 15 ppt • Ranges on Texoma vary from ~ 0.5 – 1.8 ppt. Lebanon Pool can reach ~ 2.00 ppt when isolated. Temperature – Historically, blooms happen in the Winter or early Spring. • Blooms on Texoma have shifted from early in the year (Jan – Mar) to early summer (June – July of 2017) • Is this a change or an isolated incident? Sunlight – Some studies have found that UV light reduces toxicity of P. parvum blooms. • Winter blooms may be a response from shifting from an autotroph to an heterotroph? • Less competition from other algal species in winter? How Does Golden Algae Kill Fish? P. Parvum releases several toxic compounds into the water column during a bloom (usually ≥ 50,000 cells/mL). Prymnesins – Hemolysin – Stearidonic acid – Neurotoxins? Toxins tend to concentrate as the bloom subsides • triggered by inflow ( esp. after low water events) Why are toxins released? • Competition for resources? • Stress? • Are toxins endogenous or exogenous? • Difficult to compare natural waters to lab samples. Henrikson, J.C., M.S. Gharfeh, A.C. Easton, J.D. Easton, K.L. Glenn, S.L. Mooberry, K.D. Hambright, R.H. Cichewicz. 2010. Reassessing the ichthyotoxin profile of cultured Prymnesium parvum (Golden Algae) and comparing it to samples collected from recent freshwater bloom and fish kill events in North America. Toxicon 55:1396-1404. Most Recent Lake Texoma Fish Kill June 21 to 24, 2017 - Paradise Cove , Big Mineral arm. • approximately 157,000 dead fish in the area • 90 percent were small (1 inch) threadfin shad Other fish species significantly affected (estimates): • 9,122 freshwater drum • 1,332 crappie • Small numbers of catfish and other game fish • No striped bass observed. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (press release) What does a Golden Algae Bloom look like? Brazos River Authority and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Texas Parks and Wildlife Department University of Oklahoma Plankton Ecology and Limnology Lab During full bloom water takes on a golden color. Foam often forms along shoreline, especially in windy conditions. Fish kills usually begin to appear as water becomes discolored. Birds and other animals are often observed eating dead fish and drinking discolored water with no ill effects. What does a P. parvum kill look like? Fish may be spotted “gasping for air” at the surface of the water, even when DO is in the normal range. Dead and dying fish have brightly colored gills, sometimes damage to tissue is obvious Fins and skin areas between scales become bloody. Threadfin shad and drum are usually the first to die off, followed by crappie, sunfish, and game fish. Mussels, salamanders, and other thin-skinned species may be affected. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department © 2006 (Greg Southard) What are the Dangers to Humans, Livestock, and Pets? Complete suite of toxins and allelopathic chemicals are currently unknown. Toxins lethal to fish appear to be photolabile and degrade rapidly when exposed to sunlight. Individual toxins are very difficult to obtain and/or reproduce in the laboratory.
Recommended publications
  • 28-Protistsf20r.Ppt [Compatibility Mode]
    9/3/20 Ch 28: The Protists (a.k.a. Protoctists) (meet these in more detail in your book and lab) 1 Protists invent: eukaryotic cells size complexity Remember: 1°(primary) endosymbiosis? -> mitochondrion -> chloroplast genome unicellular -> multicellular 2 1 9/3/20 For chloroplasts 2° (secondary) happened (more complicated) {3°(tertiary) happened too} 3 4 Eukaryotic “supergroups” (SG; between K and P) 4 2 9/3/20 Protists invent sex: meiosis and fertilization -> 3 Life Cycles/Histories (Fig 13.6) Spores and some protists (Humans do this one) 5 “Algae” Group PS Pigments Euglenoids chl a & b (& carotenoids) Dinoflagellates chl a & c (usually) (& carotenoids) Diatoms chl a & c (& carotenoids) Xanthophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Chrysophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Coccolithophorids chl a & c (& carotenoids) Browns chl a & c (& carotenoids) Reds chl a, phycobilins (& carotenoids) Greens chl a & b (& carotenoids) (more groups exist) 6 3 9/3/20 Name word roots (indicate nutrition) “algae” (-phyt-) protozoa (no consistent word ending) “fungal-like” (-myc-) Ecological terms plankton phytoplankton zooplankton 7 SG: Excavata/Excavates “excavated” feeding groove some have reduced mitochondria (e.g.: mitosomes, hydrogenosomes) 8 4 9/3/20 SG: Excavata O: Diplomonads: †Giardia Cl: Parabasalids: Trichonympha (bk only) †Trichomonas P: Euglenophyta/zoa C: Kinetoplastids = trypanosomes/hemoflagellates: †Trypanosoma C: Euglenids: Euglena 9 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates cell membrane 10 5 9/3/20 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates P: Dinoflagellata/Pyrrophyta:
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algae 91 (2020) 101587
    Harmful Algae 91 (2020) 101587 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Harmful Algae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hal Review Progress and promise of omics for predicting the impacts of climate change T on harmful algal blooms Gwenn M.M. Hennona,c,*, Sonya T. Dyhrmana,b,* a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States c College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Climate change is predicted to increase the severity and prevalence of harmful algal blooms (HABs). In the past Genomics twenty years, omics techniques such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics have trans- Transcriptomics formed that data landscape of many fields including the study of HABs. Advances in technology have facilitated Proteomics the creation of many publicly available omics datasets that are complementary and shed new light on the Metabolomics mechanisms of HAB formation and toxin production. Genomics have been used to reveal differences in toxicity Climate change and nutritional requirements, while transcriptomics and proteomics have been used to explore HAB species Phytoplankton Harmful algae responses to environmental stressors, and metabolomics can reveal mechanisms of allelopathy and toxicity. In Cyanobacteria this review, we explore how omics data may be leveraged to improve predictions of how climate change will impact HAB dynamics. We also highlight important gaps in our knowledge of HAB prediction, which include swimming behaviors, microbial interactions and evolution that can be addressed by future studies with omics tools. Lastly, we discuss approaches to incorporate current omics datasets into predictive numerical models that may enhance HAB prediction in a changing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Systematics of Heterokont and Haptophyte Algae1
    American Journal of Botany 91(10): 1508±1522. 2004. BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF HETEROKONT AND HAPTOPHYTE ALGAE1 ROBERT A. ANDERSEN Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, P.O. Box 475, West Boothbay Harbor, Maine 04575 USA In this paper, I review what is currently known of phylogenetic relationships of heterokont and haptophyte algae. Heterokont algae are a monophyletic group that is classi®ed into 17 classes and represents a diverse group of marine, freshwater, and terrestrial algae. Classes are distinguished by morphology, chloroplast pigments, ultrastructural features, and gene sequence data. Electron microscopy and molecular biology have contributed signi®cantly to our understanding of their evolutionary relationships, but even today class relationships are poorly understood. Haptophyte algae are a second monophyletic group that consists of two classes of predominately marine phytoplankton. The closest relatives of the haptophytes are currently unknown, but recent evidence indicates they may be part of a large assemblage (chromalveolates) that includes heterokont algae and other stramenopiles, alveolates, and cryptophytes. Heter- okont and haptophyte algae are important primary producers in aquatic habitats, and they are probably the primary carbon source for petroleum products (crude oil, natural gas). Key words: chromalveolate; chromist; chromophyte; ¯agella; phylogeny; stramenopile; tree of life. Heterokont algae are a monophyletic group that includes all (Phaeophyceae) by Linnaeus (1753), and shortly thereafter, photosynthetic organisms with tripartite tubular hairs on the microscopic chrysophytes (currently 5 Oikomonas, Anthophy- mature ¯agellum (discussed later; also see Wetherbee et al., sa) were described by MuÈller (1773, 1786). The history of 1988, for de®nitions of mature and immature ¯agella), as well heterokont algae was recently discussed in detail (Andersen, as some nonphotosynthetic relatives and some that have sec- 2004), and four distinct periods were identi®ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Report
    MMINNEAPOLISINNEAPOLIS PPARKARK && RRECREATIONECREATION BBOARDOARD 20122012 WWATERATER RRESOURCESESOURCES RREPORTEPORT Environmental Stewardship Water Resources Management www.minneapolisparks.org January 2015 2012 WATER RESOURCES REPORT Prepared by: Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Environmental Stewardship 3800 Bryant Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55409-1029 612.230.6400 www.minneapolisparks.org January 2015 Funding provided by: Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board City of Minneapolis Public Works Copyright © 2015 by the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Material may be quoted with attribution. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... iv 1. Monitoring Program Overview .............................................................................................. 1-1 2. Birch Pond .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 3. Brownie Lake ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 4. Lake Calhoun ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 5. Cedar Lake ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protist Phylogeny and the High-Level Classification of Protozoa
    Europ. J. Protistol. 39, 338–348 (2003) © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/ejp Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 September 2003; 29 September 2003. Accepted: 29 September 2003 Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Pro- tozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eu- karyotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the an- cestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Re- taria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Cilio- phora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane).
    [Show full text]
  • CH28 PROTISTS.Pptx
    9/29/14 Biosc 41 Announcements 9/29 Review: History of Life v Quick review followed by lecture quiz (history & v How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? phylogeny) v What is thought to have been the first genetic material? v Lecture: Protists v Are we tetrapods? v Lab: Protozoa (animal-like protists) v Most atmospheric oxygen comes from photosynthesis v Lab exam 1 is Wed! (does not cover today’s lab) § Since many of the first organisms were photosynthetic (i.e. cyanobacteria), a LOT of excess oxygen accumulated (O2 revolution) § Some organisms adapted to use it (aerobic respiration) Review: History of Life Review: Phylogeny v Which organelles are thought to have originated as v Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry endosymbionts? v Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution v During what event did fossils resembling modern taxa suddenly appear en masse? v A valid clade is monophyletic, meaning it consists of the ancestor taxon and all its descendants v How many mass extinctions seem to have occurred during v A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and Earth’s history? Describe one? some, but not all, of the descendants v When is adaptive radiation likely to occur? v A polyphyletic grouping includes distantly related species but does not include their most recent common ancestor v Maximum parsimony assumes the tree requiring the fewest evolutionary events is most likely Quiz 3 (History and Phylogeny) BIOSC 041 1. How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? 2. Why might many organisms have evolved to use aerobic respiration? PROTISTS! Reference: Chapter 28 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Diatom and Apicomplexan Models to Study the Heme Pathway of Chromera Velia
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Using Diatom and Apicomplexan Models to Study the Heme Pathway of Chromera velia Jitka Richtová 1,2, Lilach Sheiner 3 , Ansgar Gruber 1 , Shun-Min Yang 1,2 , LudˇekKoˇrený 4, Boris Striepen 5 and Miroslav Oborník 1,2,* 1 Biology Centre CAS, Laboratory of Evolutionary Protistology, Institute of Parasitology, 370 05 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (S.-M.Y.) 2 Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic 3 Welcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; [email protected] 4 Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK; [email protected] 5 Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-387-775-464 Abstract: Heme biosynthesis is essential for almost all living organisms. Despite its conserved function, the pathway’s enzymes can be located in a remarkable diversity of cellular compartments in different organisms. This location does not always reflect their evolutionary origins, as might be expected from the history of their acquisition through endosymbiosis. Instead, the final subcellular localization of the enzyme reflects multiple factors, including evolutionary origin, demand for the product, availability of the substrate, and mechanism of pathway regulation. The biosynthesis of Citation: Richtová, J.; Sheiner, L.; heme in the apicomonad Chromera velia follows a chimeric pathway combining heme elements from Gruber, A.; Yang, S.-M.; Koˇrený,L.; the ancient algal symbiont and the host.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Review
    PEER-REVIEWED REVIEW ARTICLE bioresources.com Potential of the Micro and Macro Algae for Biofuel Production: A Brief Review Renganathan Rajkumar,* Zahira Yaakob, and Mohd Sobri Takriff The world seems to be raising its energy needs owing to an expanding population and people’s desire for higher living standards. Diversification biofuel sources have become an important energy issue in recent times. Among the various resources, algal biomass has received much attention in the recent years due to its relatively high growth rate, its vast potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change, and their ability to store high amounts of lipids and carbohydrates. These versatile organisms can also be used for the production of biofuel. In this review, sustainability and the viability of algae as an up-coming biofuel feedstock have been discussed. Additionally, this review offers an overview of the status of biofuel production through algal biomass and progress made so far in this area. Keywords: Microalgae; Macroalgae; Biomass; Lipid; Biofuel; Oil production; Bioconversion; Algaculture; Wastewater treatment; Malaysia Contact information: Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; * Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The energy requirements of the global community are rising year by year. Currently, fossil fuels are a prominent source of transportation fuels and energy. The world’s demand for oil is expected to rise 60% from the current level by 2025 (Khan et al. 2009). In view of the increasing oil demand and the depleting oil reserves, development of innovative techniques for the production of biofuels from novel renewable biomass feedstock sources are gaining importance all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • And Macro-Algae: Utility for Industrial Applications
    MICRO- AND MACRO-ALGAE: UTILITY FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS Outputs from the EPOBIO project September 2007 Prepared by Anders S Carlsson, Jan B van Beilen, Ralf Möller and David Clayton Editor: Dianna Bowles cplpressScience Publishers EPOBIO: Realising the Economic Potential of Sustainable Resources - Bioproducts from Non-food Crops © September 2007, CNAP, University of York EPOBIO is supported by the European Commission under the Sixth RTD Framework Programme Specific Support Action SSPE-CT-2005-022681 together with the United States Department of Agriculture. Legal notice: Neither the University of York nor the European Commission nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use to which information contained in this publication may be put, nor for any errors that may appear despite careful preparation and checking. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of York, nor the European Commission. Non-commercial reproduction is authorized, provided the source is acknowledged. Published by: CPL Press, Tall Gables, The Sydings, Speen, Newbury, Berks RG14 1RZ, UK Tel: +44 1635 292443 Fax: +44 1635 862131 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cplbookshop.com ISBN 13: 978-1-872691-29-9 Printed in the UK by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 HABITATS AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 4 2.1 Definition of terms 4 2.2 Macro-algae 5 2.2.1 Habitats for red, green and brown macro-algae 5 2.2.2 Production systems 6 2.3 Micro-algae 9 2.3.1 Applications of micro-algae 9 2.3.2 Production
    [Show full text]
  • The Fungi Belonging to Kingdom Chromista: A. Oomycota
    The Fungi belonging to Kingdom Chromista: a. Oomycota: Dr. Basudha Sharma Chromista ► Wittaker divided living beings into 5-Kingdom-Monera (Prokaryotic), Protista (Eukaryotic), Fungi, Plantae and Animalia. Molecular phylogeny, however suggested a new division: Chromista ► The chromists represent an independent evolutionary lineage that appears to have diverged from the same common ancestor as plants, animals and fungi. ► Chromista means ‘coloured’ and includes some colourless chromists like oomycota and certain algae. ► they all possess flagellated cells at some stage of their life cycles, and the flagella are typically of two types-hetrokont (whiplash and tinsel) ► the chloroplast is bounded by a double membrane, but has an extra layer of ER (also two-layered) that is often continuous with the nuclear envelope Chromista Oomycota ► commonly known as water moulds ► some are unicellular, however majority are multicellular and mycelial (branched filamentous coenocyte) ► They are classified as chromists because their free-swimming zoospores possess the heterokont-type flagella also, reserve food is stored in the form of mycolaminarin, an energy storage molecule similar to that found in diatoms and brown algae. ► oomycetes cell walls are composed of cellulose, free-living stage of the oomycetes has a diploid chromosome complement while that of the fungi is haploid. ► Asexual reproduction is by biflagellate zoospores ► Sexual reproduction is oogamus and involves the formation of oogonia and antheridia Saprolegnia ► These fungi are saprophytic organisms that are widely distributed in the aquatic environment and can derive nutrients from any organic source in water ► They become pathogenic to fish only when fish are stressed or eg. diseased. They attach to surfaces like gills and fins of fishes ► Reproduction in Saprolegnia may be sexual or asexual.
    [Show full text]