Decentralized Climate Finance Programme – Padfc)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decentralized Climate Finance Programme – Padfc) Programme D’appui Décentralisé A La Finance Climat (Decentralized Climate Finance Programme – Padfc) | Benin Fonds National Environnement et Climat [National Fund for the Environment and Climate – FNEC] 30 January 2017 PROGRAMME D’APPUI DÉCENTRALISÉ A LA FINANCE Project/Programme Title: CLIMAT [DECENTRALIZED CLIMATE FINANCE PROGRAMME – PADFC] Country/Region: BENIN Fonds National Environnement et Climat [National Fund for the Accredited Entity: Environment and Climate – FNEC] – accreditation pending Ministère du Cadre de Vie et du Développement Durable National Designated Authority: [Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development – MCVDD] PROJECT / PROGRAMME CONCEPT NOTE GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 1 OF 19 Please submit the completed form to [email protected] A. Project/Programme Information PROGRAMME D’APPUI DÉCENTRALISÉ A LA FINANCE CLIMAT A.1. Project/programme title [DECENTRALIZED CLIMATE FINANCE PROGRAMME – PADFC] A.2. Project or programme Programme A.3. Country(ies) / region BENIN A.4. National designated Ministère du Cadre de Vie et du Développement Durable [Ministry of the authority(ies) Environment and Sustainable Development – MCVDD] Fonds National Environnement et Climat [National Fund for the Environment and A.5. Accredited entity Climate – FNEC] – accreditation pending (implementing entity) Executing Entities: Direction Générale Environnement Climat [Directorate General for Environment and Climate – DGEC], Secrétariat Permanent de la Commision A.6. Executing entity / Nationale des Finances Locales [Permanent Secretariat of the National Commission beneficiary for Local Finance – SP/CONAFIL], devolved government departments, local governments, contracted service providers Beneficiaries: Local communities A.7. Access modality Direct☒ International☐ A.8. Project size category (total investment, million Micro (≤10) ☐ Small (10<x≤50) ☒ Medium (50<x≤250) ☐ Large (>250) ☐ USD) A.9. Mitigation / adaptation Mitigation☐ Adaptation☒ Cross-cutting☐ focus A.10. Public or private public Which of the following targeted results areas does the proposed project/programme address? Reduced emissions from: ☐ Energy access and power generation (E.g. on-grid, micro-grid or off-grid solar, wind, geothermal, etc.) ☐ Low emission transport (E.g. high-speed rail, rapid bus system, etc.) ☐ Buildings, cities, industries and appliances (E.g. new and retrofitted energy-efficient buildings, energy-efficient equipment for companies and supply chain management, etc.) ☐ Forestry and land use A.11. Results areas (E.g. forest conservation and management, agroforestry, agricultural irrigation, water treatment and (mark all that apply) management, etc.) Increased resilience of: ☒ Most vulnerable people and communities (E.g. mitigation of operational risk associated with climate change – diversification of supply sources and supply chain management, relocation of manufacturing facilities and warehouses, etc.) ☒ Health and well-being, and food and water security (E.g. climate-resilient crops, efficient irrigation systems, etc.) ☒ Infrastructure and built environment (E.g. sea walls, resilient road networks, etc.) ☒ Ecosystems and ecosystem services (E.g. ecosystem conservation and management, ecotourism, etc.) 1Please use the following naming convention for the file name: “[CN]-[Agency short name]-[Date]-[Serial number]” (e.g. CN-ABC-20150101-1). PROJECT / PROGRAMME CONCEPT NOTE GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 2 OF 19 A.12. Project / programmelife ………5 years…….. span A.13. Estimated Start: 2018………………………... implementation start and end date End: 2022…………………………. B. Project/Programme Details The Fund requires the following preliminary information in order to promptly assess the eligibility of project/programme investment. These requirements may vary depending on the nature of the project/programme. Overview of decentralized climate finance in Benin The decentralization process began in the 1990s. A new legal and administrative framework was subsequently established in 1999-2001 (Art. 93 to 96 of Act no. 97-029 of 15 January 1999 on the organization of communes in the Republic of Benin). The communes are the only fully decentralized entities and are invested with three different forms of power – devolved, shared and delegated. Communes are required to produce their own local development plans according to central government guidelines. The new councils – voted in following the local elections in 2015 – are currently working on plans for 2016-2020. The communes receive the majority of their funding from two sources: direct payments from central government and aid from technical and financial partners (TFPs). Most communes still have limited mobilization of their own resources. Direct payments from central government come from the Fonds d’Appui au Développement Local [Local Development Support Fund – FADeC] – a national mechanism, set up in 2008, to fund local development in Benin. The priorities for the coming years include building administrative, technical and financial capacities and strengthening local authority management. These priorities are confirmed in the Programme d’Action du Gouvernement [Government Action Programme – PAG] for 2016-2021, as defined by the new Government (which came to power in April 2016). The PAG includes a specific action entitled “Building decentralization process capacities”, which forms part of a broader strategic objective entitled “Balanced and sustainable development of the national space” (Pillar: “Improving living conditions for Benin’s population”). There is therefore a need for greater recognition of climate change at the local level. The Government has made clear its intention to devolve greater responsibility on this issue to the B.1. communes, in line with the establishment of the new strategic and operational framework on Project/programme adaptation, known as the Plan National d’Adaptation [National Adaptation Plan – PNA] (currently description under development). While responsibility for environmental conservation rests with the communes, (including no explicit mention is made of climate issues. In 2016, however, a new methodological framework objectives) was produced for Plans de Développement Communaux [Communal Development Plans]. This guide is currently being disseminated and includes climate perspectives throughout the commune planning/programming cycle. This naturally raises the question of funding, with substantial funds needed to support local adaptation efforts and to strengthen both competencies and infrastructure. Building on past pilot schemes (in particular the LoCAL project initiated in 2013), the Government is aiming for large- scale deployment of mechanisms to help address local adaptation challenges. This area of intervention is one of the stated adaptation priorities of the country’s intended nationally determined contribution (INDC), as prepared in 2015 (measure 5: Strengthen local governance of climate change adaptation finance). Defined programme Objectives and expected outcomes The overall objective of the programme is to support climate finance decentralization and, in doing so, to promote greater responsibility for adaptation issues at the communal level. The ultimate aim is to enhance local resilience to climate change. The specific objectives are as follows: (i) to devolve greater responsibility for climate issues to the communes by helping them to plan, budget for, implement and monitor adaptation measures; (ii) to finance investment measures identified as priorities by the communes, in consultation with the communities; and (iii) to consolidate and share lessons learned. PROJECT / PROGRAMME CONCEPT NOTE GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 3 OF 19 Intervention components The proposed programme includes four intervention components: Component 1. Establish, at the national level, a sustainable mechanism for self-managed and transparent implementation of adaptation efforts at the local level. - Outcome 1.1. Synergy and coordination between adaptation actions are improved at the local level (intervention frameworks). - Outcome 1.2. A sustainable, FNEC-coordinated financing mechanism is established at the national level and is integrated or aligned with the FADeC procedures. Component 2. Build the capacities of local development stakeholders to implement climate change adaptation measures effectively. - Outcome 2.1. Tools and methodologies are developed in accordance with commune needs, including access to climate data. - Outcome 2.2. Communal development stakeholders (elected officials, staff, communities, decentralized government departments, private service providers, etc.) receive training and support to integrate climate change adaptation measures. - Outcome 2.3. Climate change adaptation is included in strategic and sector-specific planning documents at the local level. Component 3. Have the communes implement priority adaptation measures via a system of performance-based climate resilience grants. - Outcome 3.1. Communal development stakeholders (elected officials, staff, communities, decentralized government departments, private service providers, etc.) receive training and support to implement climate change adaptation measures. - Outcome 3.2. Natural resource preservation measures are implemented. - Outcome 3.3. Smallholder farm resilience and food security measures are implemented. - Outcome 3.4. Climate-resilient infrastructure is established to improve natural risk prevention and management. Component 4. Monitor, build on and consolidate outcomes and knowledge. - Outcome
Recommended publications
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Projdoc.Pdf
    Tanguieta Toucountouna Benin Natitingou Perma Intervention areas: child protection, hunger and health Abomey Condji - Lokossa Cotonou Project “Nurse Me” This project stems from the need to support the children hosted in three of our accommodation centres in Benin, through the supply of powder milk. ‘Nurse me’ involves undernourished, motherless, neglected children or whose mothers are HIV positive, and who for these reasons can’t be breastfed during the first months of their lives. The project develops in the regions of Zou and Atacora, two areas in which inhabitants live mainly in rural villages. The health situation in these regions is alarming: childbirth mortality rate is extremely high and newborns are often underweight. Moreover, breastfeeding without blood ties is not contemplated in Benin’s culture. This factor, together with malnutrition, lack of hygiene, and the rampant plague of AIDS, causes several deceases. In addition to this, international aid has decreased, because of two issues: 1) the global economic crisis has led governments to reduce the aid to the countries of the South; 2) the World Food Programme has diminished the food aid in favour of Benin, in order to allocate more in support of countries at war. Insieme ai bambini del mondo Project objectives - Promote the right to life and health; - Prevent babies’ premature death caused by the impossibility of breastfeeding. Project beneficiaries - Undernourished, motherless, neglected children or whose mothers are HIV positive, who are hosted in our accommodation centres or monitored by the nutritional centre; - Families living in rural areas around our accommodation centres, which can benefit from a free health and nutritional service for their children.
    [Show full text]
  • GIEWS Country Brief Benin
    GIEWS Country Brief Benin Reference Date: 23-April-2020 FOOD SECURITY SNAPSHOT Planting of 2020 main season maize ongoing in south under normal moisture conditions Above-average 2019 cereal crop harvested Prices of coarse grains overall stable in March Pockets of food insecurity persist Start of 2020 cropping season in south follows timely onset of rains Following the timely onset of seasonal rains in the south, planting of yams was completed in March, while planting of the main season maize crop is ongoing and will be completed by the end of April. The harvest of yams is expected to start in July, while harvesting operations of maize will start in August. Planting of rice crops, to be harvested from August, is underway. The cumulative rainfall amounts since early March have been average to above average in most planted areas and supported the development of yams and maize crops, which are at sprouting, seedling and tillering stages. Weeding activities are normally taking place in most cropped areas. In the north, seasonal dry weather conditions are still prevailing and planting operations for millet and sorghum, to be harvested from October, are expected to begin in May-June with the onset of the rains. In April, despite the ongoing pastoral lean season, forage availability was overall satisfactory in the main grazing areas of the country. The seasonal movement of domestic livestock, returning from the south to the north, started in early March following the normal onset of the rains in the south. The animal health situation is generally good and stable, with just some localized outbreaks of seasonal diseases, including Trypanosomiasis and Contagious Bovine Peripneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA-Benin's ‘Access to Land’ Project and Its Aftermath
    BENIN INSTITUTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC WP19/BID08 CHAPTER 7: HISTORY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LAND ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN BENIN Philippe Lavigne Delville French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development, With discussion by Kenneth Houngbedji Paris School of Economics August 2019 History and Political Economy of Land Administration Reform in Benin Table of contents Acronyms ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Land reforms in Africa, between the privatisation paradigm and the adaptation paradigm 1 1.2 Understanding the political economy of an ongoing reform: a process-tracing approach 4 2 State ownership, informality, semi-formal arrangements and ‘confusion management’: a brief analysis of the land sector in the early 2000s 6 2.1 Institutional weaknesses and semi-formal arrangements 6 2.2 Land governance, between neo-customary regulations, the market, and semi- formal systems 10 2.3 ‘Managing confusion’ 13 2.4 Institutional bottlenecks before reforms: a tentative synthesis 15 3 The search for overall/sectorial adjustment in the land sector in the years 1990– 2000: a telescoping of reforms 16 3.1 The emergence of the land issue in the 1990s 16 3.2 In urban areas, tax experiments and unsuccessful discussions on legal reform 16 3.3 In rural areas, the PFRs and the draft rural land law: the construction of an alternative to land title 17 3.4 In the mid-2000s: the MCA-Benin and the emergence of a global reform project 20 4 Extend access to land title through a deep reform of land administration: MCA- Benin's ‘Access to Land’ project and its aftermath
    [Show full text]
  • Carte Pédologique De Reconnaissance De La République Populaire Du Bénin À 1/200.000 : Feuille De Djougou
    P. FAURE NOTICE EXPLICATIVE No 66 (4) CARTE PEDOLOGIQUE DE RECONNAISSANCE de la République Populaire du Bénin à 1/200.000 Feuille de DJOUGOU OFFICE OE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIWE ET TECHNIOUE OUTRE-MER 1 PARIS 1977 NOTICE EXPLICATIVE No 66 (4) CARTE PEDOLOGIQUE DE RECONNAISSANCE de la RepubliquePopulaire du Bénin à 1 /200.000 Feuille de DJOUGOU P. FAURE ORSTOM PARIS 1977 @ORSTOM 2977 ISBN 2-7099-0423-3(édition cornpl8te) ISBN 2-7099-0433-0 SOMMAI RE l. l INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 I .GENERALITES SUR LE MILIEU ET LA PEDOGENESE ........... 3 Localisationgéographique ............................ 3 Les conditionsde milieu 1. Le climat ................... 3 2 . La végétation ................. 6 3 . Le modelé et l'hydrographie ....... 8 4 . Le substratum géologique ........ 10 Les matériaux originels et la pédogenèse .................. 12 1 . Les matériaux originels .......... 12 2 . Les processus pédogénétiques ...... 13 II-LESSOLS .......................................... 17 Classification 1. Principes de classification ....... 17 2 . La légende .................. 18 Etudemonographique 1 . Les sols minérauxbruts ......... 20 2 . Les sois peuévolués ............ 21 3 . Les sols ferrugineuxtropicaux ....... 21 4 . Les sols ferraliitiques ........... 38 CONCLUSION .......................................... 43 Répartitiondes' sols . Importance relative . Critèresd'utilisation . 43 Les principalescontraintes pour la mise en valeur ............ 46 BIBLIOGRAPHIE ........................................ 49 1 INTRODUCTION La carte pédologique de reconnaissance à 1/200 000, feuille DJOUGOU, fait partie d'un ensemble de neuf coupures imprimées couvrant la totalité du terri- toire de la République Populaire du Bénin. Les travaux de terrain de la couverture générale ont été effectués de 1967 à 1971 par les quatre pédologues de la Section de Pédologie du Centre O. R.S. T.O.M. de Cotonou : D. DUBROEUCQ, P. FAURE, M. VIENNOT, B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Support for International Family Planning and Health Organizations 2 (SIFPO2) April 2014 – December 2020
    Population Services International (PSI) Support for International Family Planning and Health Organizations 2 (SIFPO2) April 2014 – December 2020 SIFPO2 Year Five Annual Report October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019 USAID Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-OAA-A-14-00037 CONTENTS Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. 4 SIFPO2 Year Five Overview .................................................................................................................. 1 October 2018 – September 2019 ........................................................................................................ 1 FY2019 Summary Expenses ................................................................................................................ 3 Success Stories .................................................................................................................................... 4 Year Five Activities and Outputs .......................................................................................................... 6 Result 1: Strengthened organizational capacity to deliver high quality FP/RH services to intended beneficiaries ...................................................................................................................... 6 Sub-Result 1.1 Global organizational systems that strengthen FP and other health program performance improved, streamlined and disseminated ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Polio Outbreak for Four Months;
    Emergency appeal n°: Africa: Polio MDR61004 (West & Central Africa); MDR64005 (East Africa); MDR63002 (Southern Africa) Operations update n° 1 outbreak 14 May 2009 Period covered by this Ops Update: 7 April – 14 May, 2009 Appeal target (current): this appeal has been provisionally increased to CHF 2,520,794 (USD 2.3m or EUR 1.7) Appeal coverage: 24.6% (indicative) against the provisional revised budget figure of CHF 2.5m; the final revised budgets and updated financial report will be made available shortly; <click here to link to contact details for further information Appeal history: · This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on 7 April 2009 to assist approximately 25 million children under 5 years of age in 14 countries affected by the polio outbreak for four months; · This Operations Update seeks to add the three following countries in West Africa Volunteers from the Burkinabe Red Cross work with district to the Appeal (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra health teams to vaccinate a child against polio. Leone); the Appeal budget is provisionally revised to CHF 2.5m. · Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF): CHF 357,842 was initially allocated from the Federation’s DREF to support emergency response campaigns in March (Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, and Mali) and April (Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo). CHF 235,888 was allocated from the Federation’s DREF to support the emergency response campaign in April in Kenya. · Global Measles & Polio Initiative: CHF 160,000 was initially allocated from the Health and Care Department’s Global Measles & Polio Initiative to support activities in four countries during February and March (Cote d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Togo).
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Benin, Burkina Faso, Niger
    AFB/PPRC.22-23/14 6 June 2018 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee PROPOSAL FOR BENIN, BURKINA FASO, NIGER AFB/PPRC.22-23/14 Background 1. The strategic priorities, policies and guidelines of the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), as well as its operational policies and guidelines include provisions for funding projects and programmes at the regional, i.e. transnational level. However, the Fund has thus far not funded such projects and programmes. 2. The Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), as well as its Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and Ethics and Finance Committee (EFC) considered issues related to regional projects and programmes on a number of occasions between the Board’s fourteenth and twenty-first meetings but the Board did not make decisions for the purpose of inviting proposals for such projects. Indeed, in its fourteenth meeting, the Board decided to: (c) Request the secretariat to send a letter to any accredited regional implementing entities informing them that they could present a country project/programme but not a regional project/programme until a decision had been taken by the Board, and that they would be provided with further information pursuant to that decision (Decision B.14/25 (c)) 3. In its eighth meeting in March 2012, the PPRC came up with recommendations on certain definitions related to regional projects and programmes. However, as the subsequent seventeenth Board meeting took a different strategic approach to the overall question of regional projects and programmes, these PPRC recommendations were not included in a Board decision. 4. In its twenty-fourth meeting, the Board heard a presentation from the coordinator of the working group set up by decision B.17/20 and tasked with following up on the issue of regional projects and programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Study of Practices and Experiences
    Development Partners Working Group on Local Governance and Decentralization International Development Partner Harmonisation for Enhanced Aid Effectiveness ALIGNMENT STRATEGIES IN THE FIELD OF DECENTRALISATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE Country Study of Practices and Experiences BENIN Draft Report October 2007 Susanne Hesselbarth Alignment Strategies: Country Study Benin TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................I I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND TO THE DECENTRALISATION PROCESS ...................................2 II.1 MILESTONES OF DECENTRALISATION AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNANCE IN BENIN...............2 II.2 COHERENCE OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES ..............................................5 II.3 KEY ISSUES FOR DECENTRALISATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE....................................6 II.4 DP SUPPORT TO DECENTRALISATION .........................................................................9 III. PRACTICE OF AID HARMONISATION AND EFFECTIVENESS........................13 III.1 MANAGEMENT OF THE DECENTRALISATION PROCESS.................................................13 III.2 DEVELOPMENT PARTNER COORDINATION MECHANISMS .............................................15 III.3 ALIGNMENT OF DP SUPPORT TO COUNTRY STRATEGIES.............................................17 III.4 SUPPORT MODALITIES FOR DPS ..............................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Des Départements Du Zou Et Des Collines
    Spatialisation des cibles prioritaires des ODD au Bénin : Monographie des départements du Zou et des Collines Note synthèse sur l’actualisation du diagnostic et la priorisation des cibles des communes du département de Zou Collines Une initiative de : Direction Générale de la Coordination et du Suivi des Objectifs de Développement Durable (DGCS-ODD) Avec l’appui financier de : Programme d’appui à la Décentralisation et Projet d’Appui aux Stratégies de Développement au Développement Communal (PDDC / GIZ) (PASD / PNUD) Fonds des Nations unies pour l'enfance Fonds des Nations unies pour la population (UNICEF) (UNFPA) Et l’appui technique du Cabinet Cosinus Conseils Tables des matières 1.1. BREF APERÇU SUR LE DEPARTEMENT ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1. INFORMATIONS SUR LES DEPARTEMENTS ZOU-COLLINES ...................................................................................... 6 1.1.1.1. Aperçu du département du Zou .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. GRAPHIQUE 1: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DU ZOU ............................................................................................... 7 1.1.1.2. Aperçu du département des Collines .................................................................................................. 8 3.1.2. GRAPHIQUE 2: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DES COLLINES .................................................................................... 10 1.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence Des Pressions Anthropiques Sur La Structure Des Populations De Pentadesma Butyracea Au Bénin
    Document generated on 09/28/2021 1:27 a.m. VertigO La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement Influence des pressions anthropiques sur la structure des populations de Pentadesma butyracea au Bénin Influence of human activities on Pentadesma butyracea populations structure in Benin Aliou Dicko, Samadori Sorotori Honoré Biaou, Armand Kuyema Natta, Choukouratou Aboudou Salami Gado and M’Mouyohoum Kouagou Vulnérabilités environnementales : perspectives historiques Article abstract Volume 16, Number 3, December 2016 The present study examined the influence of human activities on the structural characteristics of the populations of P. butyracea, a vulnerable multipurpose URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1039997ar woody species. A total of 116 plots of 500 m² were randomly installed, 68 in the sudanian region and 48 in the sudano-guinean region, for dendrometric and See table of contents floristic inventories. The populations of P. butyracea were categorized according to human pressures they are exposed to, using a Factorial Analysis of Correspondences. Three groups were discriminated : Group 1 (populations of Penessoulou and Kandi), characterized by a pressure from wild vegetation Publisher(s) fires and agricultural activities ; Group 2 (populations of Manigri and Ségbana), Université du Québec à Montréal characterized by illegal selective logging, abusive barking of P. butyracea, Éditions en environnement VertigO animal grazing ; and Group 3 (populations of Natitingou, Toucountouna and Tchaourou), characterized by excessive seeds collection and sand removal from the stream by humans. The diameter distribution structures were of left ISSN or right dissymmetry according to pressures types to which the discriminated 1492-8442 (digital) groups are subjected. For a conservation of remnant populations of P.
    [Show full text]