DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Report EIR Bravo 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Report EIR Bravo 4 February 2009 Impact Assessment Phase ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Bravo Integration Project – Bravo 4: Construction of two 400 kV Power Lines from Kendal Power Station to Zeus Substation DEAT REF NO: 12/12/20/1094 Proponent: Eskom Transmission EENNVVIIRROONNMMEENNTTAALL IIMMPPAACCTT RREEPPOORRTT Project 10637 February 2009 i 10637 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The growing demand for electricity is placing increasing pressure on Eskom’s existing power generation and transmission capacity. Eskom is committed to implementing a Sustainable Energy Strategy that complements the policies and strategies of National Government. Eskom aims to improve the reliability of electricity supply to the country, and in particular to provide for the growth in electricity demand in the Gauteng and Mpumalanga provinces. For this reason, Eskom obtained environmental authorisation to construct the new 400 kV Bravo (Kusile) coal-fired Power Station between Bronkhorstspruit and Witbank in 2007. Construction of this power station has already commenced. Due to this construction, the new Bravo power station needs to be integrated with the existing Eskom electricity infrastructure. This proposed project is to construct two new 400 kV overhead power lines from the Kendal power station to the Zeus substation. Each of these lines is approximately 100 km in length. Eskom Transmission has appointed Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd, an independent company, to conduct an EIA to evaluate the potential environmental and social impacts of the proposed project. The first phase of the EIA (Scoping Phase) has been completed. The second phase of an EIA is the Impact Assessment Phase. In the Scoping Phase public issues, concerns and suggestions were identified and these were used to shape the terms of references for the specialist studies that were conducted. The findings of the specialists are being reported on in this document – the culmination of the second phase (Impact Assessment Phase) of the EIA. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) must show the authorities, the stakeholders and the proponent what the impact of the proposal on a particular alternative will be in environmental, economical and social terms and provide informed findings of the specialist investigations. In accordance with the EIA Regulations, Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) must be given the opportunity to verify that all the issues mentioned during the stakeholder engagement process, have been addressed in the Impact Assessment. This is the main purpose of this Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). After public review, the Draft EIR will be updated and submitted to the lead authority, the National Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) for a decision about the project. Summary of what the Draft Environmental Impact Report Contains This report contains the following for comment by stakeholders: • A complete overview of the proposed project; • An overview of the EIA process followed; • A complete summary of the Public Participation (PP) Process followed; • Project alternatives including the “No-go” (no development) option; • An overview of the baseline receiving environment; • The assessment by specialists of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project along with the mitigation measures to reduce the negative impacts and enhance the positive impacts; and • An Environmental Management Plan (EMP). AN EIA CONSISTS OF SEVERAL PHASES Scoping Phase Impact Assessment Environmental Decision-making To identify issues, to Phase Impact Report Phase focus the EIA Detailed studies of potential Consolidate findings of Proponent and authorities impacts, positive and negative impact assessment use EIA findings to decide if studies project goes ahead ZITHOLELE CONSULTING February 2009 ii 10637 YOUR COMMENT ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Draft Environmental Impact Report is available for comment from Monday, 16 February 2009 to Monday, 16 March 2009 (4 weeks). This Draft Environmental Impact Report has been distributed to the authorities, all key stakeholders and all those that have requested a copy. Copies of the report are available at strategic public places in the project area (see below). List of public places where the Draft Environmental Impact Report is available: PLACE CONTACT TELEPHONE PERSON Blue Valley Golf and Country Estate, HALFWAY HOUSE Bothma, Lise (011) 512 0538 City of Johannesburg: Human Development, Kubheka, Kaiser (011) 203 3419 HALFWAY HOUSE Delmas Public Library, DELMAS Mehlape, Lydia (013) 665 2425 Kungwini Public Library, BRONKHORSTSPRUIT Smith, Brenda (013) 665 2425 Leandra Public Library, LEANDRA Potgieter, A M (017) 683 0055 Lebogang Public Library, LESLIE Mosako, Rosina (017) 683 3000 Midfield Homeowners Association, MIDSTREAM Du Preez, Tarynlee (012) 661 0456 ESTATES Midlands Homeowners Association, MIDSTREAM De Wet, Lizette 087 805 3610 ESTATES Midstream Homeowners Association, MIDSTREAM van der Westhuizen, (012) 661 0915 ESTATES Durette Olievenhoutbosch Library, OLIVENHOUTBOSCH Nkonki, Bongi (012) 652 1001 Phola Public Library, OGIES Mabena, Agnes (013) 645 0094 Secunda Public Library, SECUNDA Griesel, Tertia (017) 620 6183 The reports are also available electronically from the Public Participation office. You may comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report by: • Completing the comment sheet enclosed with the report; • Writing a letter, or producing additional written submissions; or • By email or telephone to the public participation office. DUE DATE FOR COMMENT ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Monday, 16 March 2009 to the Public Participation Office: Anelle Odendaal Public Participation Office Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd P O Box 6002 HALFWAY HOUSE, 1685 Tel: (011) 254-4855 Fax: (011) 805-2100 Email: [email protected] ZITHOLELE CONSULTING February 2009 iii 10637 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background Information .........................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Motivation for the Proposed Project ......................................................2 1.3 The Project Team ...................................................................................................4 1.4 Project Progress ......................................................................................................5 2 LEGAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................... 7 2.1 National Environmental Management Act (No 107 of 1998) ......................................7 2.2 Environmental Conservation Act (Act No 73 of 1989) ...............................................9 2.3 Additional Legal Requirements and Frameworks .......................................................9 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS .................................. 12 3.1 Study Approach and Progress to Date .................................................................... 12 3.2 Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report and Environmental Management Plan ................................................................................... XX 3.3 Announcement of opportunity to comment on findings ........................................... XX 3.4 Distribution ........................................................................................................ XXI 3.5 Methods of public review and obtaining comments .............................................. XXII 3.6 Issues and Response Report and acknowledgements ............................................ XXIII 4 ISSUES AND CONCERNS RAISED ................................................................ XXVI 4.1 Authorities ..................................................................................................... XXVII 4.2 Stakeholders ................................................................................................... XXVII 5 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES .......................................... 29 5.1 Activity to be undertaken ..................................................................................... 29 5.2 Location 29 5.3 Description of the Development Activities ............................................................. 29 6 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW / ALTERNATIVES INVESTIGATED ...................... 35 6.1 Project Alternatives ............................................................................................. 35 6.2 Route Alternatives ............................................................................................... 35 6.3 Design Alternatives ............................................................................................. 36 6.4 The No-Go Alternative ......................................................................................... 38 7 BASELINE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ........................................................ 39 7.1 Bio-Physical Environment .................................................................................... 39 7.1.6 Land Capability ................................................................................................. 60 7.2 Cultural Environment ......................................................................................... 101 7.3 Socio-Economic Environment ............................................................................ 105 8 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Special Trip) XXXX WER Yes AANDRUS, Bloemfontein 9300
    Place Name Code Hub Surch Regional A KRIEK (special trip) XXXX WER Yes AANDRUS, Bloemfontein 9300 BFN No AANHOU WEN, Stellenbosch 7600 SSS No ABBOTSDALE 7600 SSS No ABBOTSFORD, East London 5241 ELS No ABBOTSFORD, Johannesburg 2192 JNB No ABBOTSPOORT 0608 PTR Yes ABERDEEN (48 hrs) 6270 PLR Yes ABORETUM 3900 RCB Town Ships No ACACIA PARK 7405 CPT No ACACIAVILLE 3370 LDY Town Ships No ACKERVILLE, Witbank 1035 WIR Town Ships Yes ACORNHOEK 1 3 5 1360 NLR Town Ships Yes ACTIVIA PARK, Elandsfontein 1406 JNB No ACTONVILLE & Ext 2 - Benoni 1501 JNB No ADAMAYVIEW, Klerksdorp 2571 RAN No ADAMS MISSION 4100 DUR No ADCOCK VALE Ext/Uit, Port Elizabeth 6045 PLZ No ADCOCK VALE, Port Elizabeth 6001 PLZ No ADDINGTON, Durban 4001 DUR No ADDNEY 0712 PTR Yes ADDO 2 5 6105 PLR Yes ADELAIDE ( Daily 48 Hrs ) 5760 PLR Yes ADENDORP 6282 PLR Yes AERORAND, Middelburg (Tvl) 1050 WIR Yes AEROTON, Johannesburg 2013 JNB No AFGHANI 2 4 XXXX BTL Town Ships Yes AFGUNS ( Special Trip ) 0534 NYL Town Ships Yes AFRIKASKOP 3 9860 HAR Yes AGAVIA, Krugersdorp 1739 JNB No AGGENEYS (Special trip) 8893 UPI Town Ships Yes AGINCOURT, Nelspruit (Special Trip) 1368 NLR Yes AGISANANG 3 2760 VRR Town Ships Yes AGULHAS (2 4) 7287 OVB Town Ships Yes AHRENS 3507 DBR No AIRDLIN, Sunninghill 2157 JNB No AIRFIELD, Benoni 1501 JNB No AIRFORCE BASE MAKHADO (special trip) 0955 PTR Yes AIRLIE, Constantia Cape Town 7945 CPT No AIRPORT INDUSTRIA, Cape Town 7525 CPT No AKASIA, Potgietersrus 0600 PTR Yes AKASIA, Pretoria 0182 JNB No AKASIAPARK Boxes 7415 CPT No AKASIAPARK, Goodwood 7460 CPT No AKASIAPARKKAMP,
    [Show full text]
  • Goscor Cleaning Case Study - Medupi.Pdf 1 2017/02/24 2:48 PM
    Goscor Cleaning Case Study - Medupi.pdf 1 2017/02/24 2:48 PM CASE STUDY Industry: Industrial Facility Eskom’s Medupi Power Station Environmentally friendly vacuum truck cleans up at Medupi Power Station Customer Overview Medupi Power Station is a Greenfield coal-fired power plant project located west of Lephalale in Limpopo. It is regarded as the biggest dry-cooled power station in the world and the fourth largest coal plant in the Southern Hemisphere. Medupi has a planned operational life of 50 years and is the fourth dry-cooled, baseload station built in 20 years by Eskom after Kendal, Majuba and Matimba power stations. The boiler and turbine contracts for Medupi are the largest C that Eskom has signed in its 90-year history. M Y CM MY CY CMY “ K With the deployment of Challenges Medupi Power Station required specialised equipment to clean the HPVR-1000 vacuum and remove a diverse range of materials, such as ash, slurries, coal, and sludge’s at the power station during the final phase of truck, we have managed the restructuring. Environmentally conscious Medupi requires suppliers to comply with stringent standards. to quickly clear water from trenches, sumps and Solution Medupi Power Station selected Goscor Cleaning Equipment as a cavities. The truck also preferred supplier of specialised cleaning equipment. Goscor delivered the environmentally friendly high point HPVR -1000 makes clearing of coal Liquid ring vacuum truck to the power station and an additional vac truck was delivered to the Kendal Power Station. from coal mills and clear- This locally manufactured and specialised wet and dry vacuum truck was developed specifically to meet South African rugged ing of ash dust spillages conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Kusile FINAL
    THE EXTERNAL COST OF COAL -FIRED POWER GENERATION: The case of Kusile Prepared by: • Business Enterprises at University of Pretoria (Pty(Pty)) LLtLtdtdd Prepared for: • Greenpeace Africa and Greenpeace International DATE: 29 September 2011 PO Box 14679 Hatfield 0028 University of Pretoria Main Campus, Prospect Street, Hatfield, Graduate Centre, Ground Floor, Entrance 1.82 T: +27 (12) 420 4245 F: +27 (12) 362 5270 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 5 2. Background, problem statement and study limitations 7 3. The externality cost of coal-fired power generation: a sectoral overview 9 3.1 Health 9 3.2 Climate change 11 3.3 Water 13 3.4 Mining 15 4. Results 17 5. Conclusion 19 6. References 21 NOTE: For access to the annexes listed below, please refer to the Greenpeace Africa website: www.greenpeaceafrica.org Annex 0 (Background): Coal and coal-fired power generation in South Africa Annex 1: The health costs of coal-fired power generation in South Africa Annex 2: Climate change: the opportunity cost of Medupi and Kusile power stations Annex 3: Estimating the opportunity cost of water for the Kusile and Medupi coal-fired electricity power plants in South Africa Annex 4: The external costs of coal mining: the case of collieries supplying Kusile power station ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge comments provided by the Greenpeace Africa and Greenpeace International review teams, and by four workshop panellists, Prof Jane Olwoch, Prof Kuku Voyi, Prof Ban Farrell and Mr Meiring du Plessis. This research was financially supported
    [Show full text]
  • Construction First in Portable Sanitation
    Construction First in Portable Sanitation Sanitech is the leading portable sanitation company in South Africa with branches nationwide and is renowned for its service excellence and superior product technology. Sanitech was the first portable toilet hire company to supply sanitation facilities to areas where no sanitation infrastructure existed. Experience counts and Sanitech understands the importance of choosing a trusted supplier with an outstanding track record. With more than two decades of local experience and the global support of Waco International, Sanitech is the only toilet hire company with the necessary national fleet to maintain a competitive edge. Fast and Efficient Site Solutions Sanitech currently provides ablution facilities to a substantial number of construction and industrial projects throughout the country, improving both the hygiene standards and productivity on these sites. Their services include: • Supply of fresh, clean water to the units • On-site toilet cleaning and servicing to agreed timescales • Short and long term rental of portable toilets and mobile • Replenishment of toilet rolls and soap and paper hand towels ablution units Current industry projects include: • Braamhoek Dam • Glencore Mines • Aveng Mine • Avon Power Station • Anglo Mines • Xstrata Mine • Thukela Water Project • Impumelelo Mine • Shiva Uranium • Cornubia Development • Shondoni Mine • Sasol Sigma Mine • Dube Tradeport • Total Coal Mine • Sasol Wax Phase 1 & 2 • Kouga Wind Farm • Kusile Power Station • Matlosana Mall • Dedisa Power Plant Special Projects • Sibanye Mine Construction • Sasol Synfuels • Wescoal Mine • Lethabo Power Station • PetroSA Orca Rig • Stefanutti Stocks Mine • R377 Road Construction Comprehensive Health and Safety Programme Sanitech’s world-class SHE management system is driven by Waco International Corporate Standards and helps to meet health and safety responsibilities by protecting their most valuable resources – employees, customers, communities and the environment that sustains us all.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Coal-Fired Power Stations and Associated Infrastructure in the Waterberg, Limpopo
    Report No: [4793A/402719] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS: PROPOSED COAL-FIRED POWER STATIONS AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE WATERBERG, LIMPOPO FINAL SCOPING REPORT March 2009 LEAD CONSULTANT PROPONENT Ninham Shand (Pty) Ltd. Eskom Holdings Ltd. 81 Church Street Eskom Generation PO Box 1347 Megawatt Park Cape Town Maxwell Drive 8000 Sandton, 2199 Tel: (021) 481 2400 Tel: (011) 800 3501 Fax: (021) 424 5588 Fax : (011) 800 5140 Email: [email protected] Website : www.eskom.co.za PROPOSED COAL-FIRED POWER STATIONS IN THE WATERBERG, LIMPOPO: SCOPING REPORT Page i PROJECT DETAILS DEAT REFERENCE NO. : 12/12/20/1255 TITLE : FINAL SCOPING REPORT AUTHORS : Louise Corbett, Ashwin West, Brett Lawson SUBCONSULTANTS : AirShed Planning Professionals Golder Associates Groundwater Consulting Services InfoTox Ivuzi Johnny van Schalkwyk (Private Consultant) Jongens Keet Associates Makecha Development Association Ndodana Consulting Engineers Ptersa Environmental Management Consultants Riscom Smith, Summers, Ndlovu Associates Strategic Environmental Focus Urban-Econ Zitholele Consulting CLIENT : Eskom Holdings Limited (Generation Division) REPORT STATUS : Final REPORT NUMBER : 4793A/402719 REPORT DATE : 31 March 2009 ................................................ ………........................................... LOUISE CORBETT ASHWIN WEST (Pr. Sci Nat) Environmental Practitioner Associate: Environmental Discipline Group ................................................ BRETT LAWSON (Cert. EAPSA)(Pr Sci Nat) Associate: Environmental Discipline
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsored by the Department of Science and Technology Volume
    Volume 26 Number 3 • August 2015 Sponsored by the Department of Science and Technology Volume 26 Number 3 • August 2015 CONTENTS 2 Reliability benefit of smart grid technologies: A case for South Africa Angela Masembe 10 Low-income resident’s preferences for the location of wind turbine farms in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Jessica Hosking, Mario du Preez and Gary Sharp 19 Identification and characterisation of performance limiting defects and cell mismatch in photovoltaic modules Jacqui L Crozier, Ernest E van Dyk and Frederick J Vorster 27 A perspective on South African coal fired power station emissions Ilze Pretorius, Stuart Piketh, Roelof Burger and Hein Neomagus 41 Modelling energy supply options for electricity generations in Tanzania Baraka Kichonge, Geoffrey R John and Iddi S N Mkilaha 58 Options for the supply of electricity to rural homes in South Africa Noor Jamal 66 Determinants of energy poverty in South Africa Zaakirah Ismail and Patrick Khembo 79 An overview of refrigeration and its impact on the development in the Democratic Republic of Congo Jean Fulbert Ituna-Yudonago, J M Belman-Flores and V Pérez-García 90 Comparative bioelectricity generation from waste citrus fruit using a galvanic cell, fuel cell and microbial fuel cell Abdul Majeed Khan and Muhammad Obaid 100 The effect of an angle on the impact and flow quantity on output power of an impulse water wheel model Ram K Tyagi CONFERENCE PAPERS 105 Harnessing Nigeria’s abundant solar energy potential using the DESERTEC model Udochukwu B Akuru, Ogbonnaya
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Ten-Year Development Plan 2013-2022 Transmission Ten-Year Plan 2013 – 2022 > FOREWORD by GROUP EXECUTIVE
    Transmission Ten-Year Development Plan 2013-2022 Transmission Ten-Year Plan 2013 – 2022 > FOREWORD BY GROUP EXECUTIVE “I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the team that has worked and continues to work on the development of these plans.” A reliable electricity supply of acceptable quality is essential for the developed by Eskom and IPPs must be connected to the network. economic development of South Africa. It is also a prerequisite The first two phases of preferred bidders for the Department for socio-economic development, as it paves the way to access to of Energy’s REFIT renewable energy programme (wind, solar education, improved nutrition and health care, and jobs, amongst photovoltaic, solar thermal, etc.) have been announced to help others. The transmission system plays a vital role in the delivery meet South Africa’s commitment to reduce carbon emissions. of a reliable, high quality electricity supply throughout South Africa Thirdly, new loads need to be connected to the network. and the region, by delivering electricity in bulk to load centres The provision of a reliable electricity supply, which will enable South and very large end-users. From there, the distribution networks Africa to meet its economic growth targets, requires significant owned by Eskom and municipalities deliver electricity to end-users. capital investment, which is ultimately funded by electricity The transmission system needs to be well-maintained to deliver a consumers through the tariff. There is a need for stakeholders reliable supply of electricity, and it also needs to be strengthened to understand what is required to ensure a reliable and secure to meet changing customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Document Layout
    Appendix 1 IFC Handbook Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability January 1, 2012 Overview of Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability 1. IFC’s Sustainability Framework articulates the Corporation’s strategic commitment to sustainable development, and is an integral part of IFC’s approach to risk management. The Sustainability Framework comprises IFC’s Policy and Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, and IFC’s Access to Information Policy. The Policy on Environmental and Social Sustainability describes IFC’s commitments, roles, and responsibilities related to environmental and social sustainability. IFC’s Access to Information Policy reflects IFC’s commitment to transparency and good governance on its operations, and outlines the Corporation’s institutional disclosure obligations regarding its investment and advisory services. The Performance Standards are directed towards clients, providing guidance on how to identify risks and impacts, and are designed to help avoid, mitigate, and manage risks and impacts as a way of doing business in a sustainable way, including stakeholder engagement and disclosure obligations of the client in relation to project-level activities. In the case of its direct investments (including project and corporate finance provided through financial intermediaries), IFC requires its clients to apply the Performance Standards to manage environmental and social risks and impacts so that development opportunities are enhanced. IFC uses the Sustainability
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 South Africa Energy Excursion
    Alberta Foothills Desk and Derrick Club 2013 South Africa Energy Excursion Editor: Connie MacRae Alberta Foothills Desk and Derrick Club Region VII Calgary, Alberta, Canada Table of Contents October 6 SANEDI: An Overview of South Africa’s Energy Industry ........................ 1 Daphne Bennett October 7 Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site ................................................ 2 Lucy Mulgrew Cradle of Humankind: Sterkfontein Caves ............................................... 3 Lucy Mulgrew Cradle of Humankind: Maropeng Exhibition ............................................. 4 Lucy Mulgrew October 8 Cullinan Diamond Mine (above ground) ................................................... 5 Tracy Fillmore Cullinan Diamond Mine (below ground) ................................................... 7 Lucy Mulgrew SANEDI: Carbon Capture and Storage .................................................... 9 Lucy Mulgrew SANEDI: Green Transport ...................................................................... 11 Lucy Mulgrew ESKOM: Kendal Power Station .............................................................. 12 Lucy Mulgrew October 9 Hector Pieterson Museum and Apartheid Museum ................................ 13 Tracy Fillmore October 10 Bourke’s Luck Potholes .......................................................................... 15 Cori Peever October 11 Kruger National Park and Safari Game Drive ......................................... 16 Cori Peever October 12 Port Elizabeth and Siyafunda School / Collette Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Eskom Presentation
    Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Energy 15 March 2011 Eskom Holdings Ltd Update of Eskom’s Capital Expansion Programme Paul O’Flaherty Finance Director 2 1. Business overview 2. South Africa requirements and the capital expansion programme 3. Alignment with SA macro-economic principles 4. Costs and funding 5. Conclusion 3 Eskom at a glance • Strategic 100% state-owned electricity utility, strongly Eskom power grid(1) supported by the government • Vertically integrated across generation, transmission and distribution • Supplies approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity (45% of the total electricity consumed in Africa) • 40 887 employees as at 31 December 2010 • Serves 3 000 industrial, 1 000 mining, 48 000 commercial, 84 000 agricultural and more than 4 million residential customers • 27 (including 1 nuclear) operational power stations with a Existing grid system Thermal power station Possible future grid system Future interconnection substation net maximum capacity of 40.87GW as at 31 March 2010 Future hydroelectric power station Nuclear power station Future thermal power station Future gas station Hydroelectric power station Gas power station • Total electricity sales of 218 591GWh and total revenues of Interconnection substation Town R71.21bn for the year ended 31 March 2010 (R71,6bn for 9 months ended 31 December 2010) Eskom’s net capacity mix – 31 March 2010 • Infrastructure includes 390,338km of power lines and Total: 40.87GW cables (all voltages) as at 31 March 2010 • Committed to build 17GW new generation capacity expected
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Flashes No. 43
    SACAA FL ES Issue 43 – June 2019 THE MEDIUM (since 2010) FOR QUICK ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE SACAA ASSOCIATION INTRODUCTION Again, SACAA has attempted to inform and share relevant Ash related matters for your perusal. ❖ Membership news ❖ South African unemployment situation ❖ Feedback on the WOCA Conference Kind regards Mark Hunter SACAA GM MEMBERSHIP NEWS Welcome to Arno Stephen from Stephens Vervoer who has joined SACAA as an ordinary member. Hope you find your interactions with SACAA members fruitful and the networking enlightening. Walter Wirth advised that he is retiring from PPC at the end of May 2019 after a long career in the cement industry. Walter has been a SACAA member for 10 years, so Walter on behalf of SACAA we would like to wish you a healthy retirement and hope you can now tick off all those things on your to do list. What’s on? The Kusile power station project, which is located near the existing Kendal power station, in the Nkangala district of Mpumalanga, will comprise six units, each rated at an 800 MW installed capacity for a total capacity of 4 800 MW. Once completed, Kusile will be the fourth-largest coal-fired power station in the world. The power station will be the first in South Africa to install flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) – a state-of-the- art technology used to remove oxides of sulphur, such as sulphur dioxide, from exhaust flue gases in power plants that burn coal or oil. This technology is fitted as an atmospheric emission abatement technology, in line with current international practice, to ensure compliance with air-quality standards, especially since the power station is located in a priority air shed area.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Development Plan 2020-2029 FOREWORD by GROUP EXECUTIVE
    Transmission Development Plan 2020-2029 FOREWORD BY GROUP EXECUTIVE “As we do our best to meet our commitments in terms of the TDP, we will certainly face challenges; however, our hope is that, through collaboration, we can all own this plan and support its funding and execution in order to co-create an energy future in support of the economic growth of our country.” Segomoco Scheppers i FOREWORD BY GROUP EXECUTIVE The growth and development of our country’s economy to meet the growth in demand, and supply the future generation pattern. demands of a 21st century lifestyle relies heavily on a secure and With regard to cross-border Transmission inter connectors, our analysis reliable supply of electricity at affordable prices. It is obvious that people highlights the need to strengthen a number of our cross-border whose homes, workplaces, schools, and clinics are connected to the Transmission lines into neighbouring countries, in order to support grid for the first time will find their lives transformed for the better in increased cross-border electricity trade. This is expected to result in ways they could never previously have imagined. reduced upward pressure on tariffs and improved security of electricity supply both in South Africa and the region. The bulk of South Africa’s electricity is still produced by Eskom’s coal- fired power stations located in the coalfields of the Mpumalanga The benefits of a reliable and secure electricity supply to South Africa Highveld and near Lephalale, but the landscape for power generation is must be weighed against the associated costs to ensure that electricity rapidly changing.
    [Show full text]