DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report Nippon Koei Co., Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report Nippon Koei Co., Ltd No. Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector FINAL REPORT FINAL REPORT June 2010 June 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. A1P JR 10-022 Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report June 2010 Wewak Madang Gusap Erap Mt Hagen Ramu 2 Sing Sing Wapenamanda Ramu 1 Lae Goroka Figure-1 Kainantu Bauine Kundiawa Wabang Paunda Popondetta Wabo (Purari R.) Mendi Vanepa R. Substation Udava R. Hydro Power Potential Basins Existing Hydropower Kerema Brown R. Existing Thermal Power Government "C" center Rouna Hydro Complex Port Moresby Planned Hydropower Existing Transmission Line General Location Map Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector (Existing and Planned Power Transmission Lines, Hydropower and Final Report Thermal Power Plants, Substations and Control Centers) Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Catchment Area of Lake Kosipe Hydropower Scheme Lake Kosipe Dam Lake Kosipe Hydropower Scheme (Pf = 70 MW) Catchment Area of Lake Udava Hydropower Scheme Udava Intake Udava Hydropower Scheme 145 MW (Pf = 48 MW) Naoro-Brown Hydropower Naoro-Brown Scheme 60 MW Intake Rouna Power PORT MORESBY Stations 61 MW (Existing) SCALE Outline Layout Map of 0 5 10 15 20km Planned Hydropower Projects Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Figure-2 Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report Table of Contents Summary Chapter 1 Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background.......................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objective of Survey...........................................................................................1-1 1.3 Organizations Supported the Survey .................................................................1-2 1.4 Survey Schedule................................................................................................1-2 Chapter 2 Power Sector.........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 PNG Power Policy and Strategy........................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Policy Development.......................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Energy Industry Policy...................................................................................2-1 2.1.3 Energy Policy.................................................................................................2-2 2.1.4 Rural Electrification Policy............................................................................2-3 2.2 Power Sector Organizations ..............................................................................2-4 Chapter 3 Present Situation of Power Supply .......................................................................3-1 3.1 General..............................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Power Generating Plants ...................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Whole of PNG.................................................................................................3-1 3.2.2 Port Moresby Grid ..........................................................................................3-2 3.2.3 Ramu Grid.......................................................................................................3-3 3.3 Transmission and Distribution Facilities...........................................................3-5 3.3.1 Whole of PNG.................................................................................................3-5 3.3.2 Port Moresby Grid ..........................................................................................3-5 3.3.3 Ramu Grid.......................................................................................................3-8 3.4 Power and Energy Supply .................................................................................3-11 3.4.1 Whole of PNG.................................................................................................3-11 3.4.2 Port Moresby Grid ..........................................................................................3-12 3.4.3 Ramu Grid.......................................................................................................3-15 3.5 Tariff Structure and Electric Tariff ....................................................................3-17 3.5.1 Tariff Structure................................................................................................3-17 3.5.2 Electric Tariff ..................................................................................................3-18 3.6 Demand.............................................................................................................3-19 3.6.1 Sold Energy.....................................................................................................3-20 3.6.2 Number of Customers.....................................................................................3-21 3.6.3 Revenue..........................................................................................................3-22 3.7 Issues of the Existing Power Supply Facilities and Major Development Plans of TYPDP2009 .......................................................3-23 3.7.1 Issues of the Existing Power Supply Facilities ...............................................3-23 3.7.2 Development Plans of TYPDP2009 except for Hydropower Development...3-23 Chapter 4 Priority Power Development and Rehabilitation Projects ....................................4-1 4.1 Power Generation Plan in Ten Year Development Plan ....................................4-1 4.2 Generation Plan for Port Moresby System........................................................4-1 NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. i June 2010 Papua New Guinea Baseline Data Collection Survey in Power Sector Final Report 4.2.1 New Hydropower Development for POM System ........................................4-1 4.2.2 Rehabilitation of Rouna Hydropower System ...............................................4-3 4.3 Generation Plan for Ramu System ....................................................................4-4 4.3.1 New Hydropower Development for Ramu System ........................................4-4 4.4 Other Potential Hydropower Development Projects .........................................4-5 4.4.1 Wabo Power Project........................................................................................4-5 Chapter 5 Engineering Geology and Foundations ................................................................5-1 5.1 General Geology................................................................................................5-1 5.1.1 Three Major Tectonic Elements ......................................................................5-1 5.1.2 Rocks in the Platform and Mobile Zone and Engineering Feature.................5-2 5.2 Assessment of Engineering Geology and Foundation of Priority Project.........5-4 5.2.1 Port Moresby Grid ..........................................................................................5-4 5.2.2 Ramu Grid.......................................................................................................5-10 5.2.3 Wabo Hydro Power Project Site .....................................................................5-14 Chapter 6 Environmental and Social Consideration .............................................................6-1 6.1 Baseline Features of Natural Resources and Socioeconomic Conditions .........6-1 6.2 Environmental Laws, Regulations, Guidelines .................................................6-2 6.2.1 Legislation related to Environmental Impact Assessment ..............................6-2 6.3 Legislation and Procedures for Environmental Study on Hydropower Development ...........................................................................6-4 6.4 Legislation and Legal Procedure for Land Acquisition for Development.........6-5 6.5 Requirement of Study and Assessment of Environmental and Social Consideration...................................................................................6-9 6.5.1 Present situation on the proposed area............................................................6-9 6.5.2 Required study ................................................................................................6-23 Chapter 7 Needs of Cooperation ...........................................................................................7-1 7.1 Approach of Needs Assessment........................................................................7-1 7.2 Potential Projects for Cooperation ...................................................................7-1 7.3 Support Policy of Other Donor Agencies..........................................................7-4 7.3.1 Aid Activities of ADB, World Bank, Government of Australia ......................7-4 7.3.2 Needs of Cooperation among Donors............................................................7-6 Appendix-1 List of Persons Met Appendix-2 Wabo Project Overview Appendix-3 Legislation related to Environmental Assessment/Land Protection/Land
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram Phonology, Lexicon, and Morphosyntax A dissertation in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Don Roger Daniels Committee in charge: Professor Marianne Mithun, Chair Professor Bernard Comrie Professor Carol Genetti Professor Andrew Pawley June 2015 The dissertation of Don Roger Daniels is approved. Bernard Comrie Carol Genetti Andrew Pawley Marianne Mithun, Committee Chair May 2015 A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, Lexicon, and Morphosyntax Copyright © 2015 by Don Roger Daniels iii Acknowledgments It takes a village to write a dissertation. I can’t possibly acknowledge everyone who has contributed to the completion of this project, but there are nevertheless many people I would like to mention. First of all, I give my thanks to my advisor and chair, Marianne Mithun. Her patience, enthusiasm, and encouragement helped me make it through graduate school, and her advice on matters professional, personal, and scholarly was invaluable in my development as a researcher. Very special thanks also go to Andy Pawley. He was the one who suggested these languages as a possible research topic all the way back in 2005, and he has been guiding me through the world of Papuan historical linguistics ever since. The other members of my committee, Bernard Comrie and Carol Genetti, have also provided steady, helpful feedback to me over the years. I have learned more and grown more as a result of the advice and supervision of these scholars than I can possibly express. I am also grateful to the various other linguists who have helped me along the way with guidance or with engaging conversations about my work, including Mark Donohue, Malcolm Ross, Ger Reesink, Sandy Thompson, Nick Evans, Lindsay Whaley, Tim Pulju, René van den Berg, Alex François, Joseph Brooks, Brad McDonnell, Bill Palmer, Edgar Suter, Tim Usher, Harold Koch, and Lourens de Vries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ncd-Enrolment-Places
    2017 National Election Electoral Roll Update Locations National Capital District Electorate: Moresby-South LOCATION ROLL UPDATE PLACE DURATION (Locations in the Ward) (Places in the Ward Locations) (For how long) WARD 1 Badihagwa Lohia Daroa’s Residence 14 Days Tatana 1 Heni Gagoa’s Residence 14 Days Hanuabada 1 Vahoi 1 14 Days Tatana 2 Araira Church Hall 14 Days Hanuabada 2 Vahoi 2 14 Days Baruni 1 Iboko Place 14 Days Baruni 2 Iboko Place 14 Days Hanuabada – Laurabada 1 Kwara Dubuna 1 14 Days Hanuabada – Laurabada 2 Kwara Dubuna 2 14 Days Idubada Idubada 14 Days Hanuabada – Lahara Mission Station 7 14 Days Kanudi Origin Place 14 Days Hanuabada – Lahara Kavari Mission Station 2 14 Days Koukou Settlement David Goroka 14 Days Elevala 1 Abisiri 1 14 Days Elevala 2 Abisiri 2 14 Days Kade Baruni Rev. Ganiga’s Residence 14 Days Borehoho Borehoho 14 Days Gabi Mango Fence – Open Air 14 Days WARD 2 Ela Beach SDA church – Open Air 14 Days Ela Makana Yet to Confirm 14 Days Lawes Road Mobile Team 14 Days Konedobu Aviat Club – Open Air 14 Days Newtown Volley Ball Court 14 Days Vanama Settlement Volley Ball Court 14 Days Paga Hill Town Police Station 14 Days Touaguba Hill Town Police Station 14 Days Town Town Police Station 14 Days Ranuguri Settlement Ranuguri - Open Air 14 Days Segani Settlement Ranuguri - Open Air 14 Days Gini Settlement Residential Area 14 Days Vainakomo Residential Area 14 Days Kaevaga Residential Area 14 Days Paga Settlement Moved to 6mile/Gerehu 14 Days WARD 3 Daugo Island Open Air 14 Days Koki Settlement Koki Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • Cl Assificat O R Y and T Y P O L O Gica L Studies in L
    CLASSIFICATORY AND TYP OLOGICA L STUDIES IN LANGUAGES OF THE WESTERN MADANG DIST RICT, NEW GUINEA BY Jo A. Z 'GRAGGEN The Australian NationaL University The Research School of Pacific Studies Department of Linguistics Canberra 1969 III PREFACE This thesis is the outcome of a period of research which began in August 1964 when I was transferred as a Missionary of the Society of the Divine Word (S.V.D.) to the Catholic Mission Station at Mugil. My linguistic aim at that time was to gain a basic idea of the nature of the Mugil language and to get an overall pic­ ture of the linguistic situation in the area for which I had to care as a missionary. An orienta­ tion trip to various parts the Bogia Sub­ of district and the Mlddle Ramu area was made in the second half of 1965. It was then that it became apparent to me how insufficient our linguistic knowledge of the Madang District was. Published material could be adequately understood only in the light of new field studies. Fieldwork was resumed again in January 1967 under the auspices of the Australian National University. Initially had planned to make a I descriptive and comparative study of the Mugil IV language. I did, however, not succeed in establishing a family or stock with Mugil as a member, but the survey work along the coast progressed well and was equally successful in the Ramu River area. was surprised to encounter in I the Ramu River area, typological features found along the coast. The original plan of the field­ trip was then given up and the rest of the time spent on establishing the boundaries of typolo�i­ cal features such as the indication of the subject with the verb, the prefixing or suffixing of possessive markers or object markers and oth�rs, and on collecting the necessary materials for a lexical classification the languages.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of *=A Contact and Reconstruction in Northeast New Guinea
    journal of language contact 12 (2019) 533-568 brill.com/jlc The History of *=a Contact and Reconstruction in Northeast New Guinea Don Daniels University of Oregon, United States [email protected] Joseph Brooks University of Virginia, United States [email protected] Abstract This paper discusses the historical borrowing of an enclitic across unrelated Papuan languages spoken along the lower Sogeram River in the Middle Ramu region of present- day Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. The enclitic *=a, which attached to the right edge of a prosodic unit, was borrowed from the Ramu family into the ances- tor of three modern Sogeram languages. Both morphological and prosodic substance were borrowed, as was the dual functionality of the enclitic – as a pragmatic marker in independent utterances and a linking device on dependent domains. We discuss the clitic’s formal and functional properties as evidence for its contact-induced origin and subsequent historical development in western Sogeram, as well as the implica- tions of these developments for our understanding of morphological and pragmatic borrowing. The complexities of this borrowing event highlight the potential for theo- ries of language contact to benefit from collaborative research on previously unstud- ied contact areas. Keywords morphological borrowing – pragmatic borrowing – comparative reconstruction – Papuan languages – Ramu languages – Sogeram languages © don daniels and joseph d. brooks, 2020 | doi:10.1163/19552629-01203001 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc License at the time of publication. Downloaded from Brill.com09/24/2021 05:51:27PM via free access <UN> 534 Daniels and Brooks 1 Introduction This paper presents the first study of language contact between two of the larg- est Papuan language families, the Ramu family and the Trans New Guinea fam- ily.
    [Show full text]
  • 0=AFRICAN Geosector
    2= AUSTRALASIA geosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 123 2=AUSTRALASIA geosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This geosector covers 223 sets of languages (1167 outer languages, composed of 2258 inner languages) spoken or formerly spoken by communities in Australasia in a geographic sequence from Maluku and the Lesser Sunda islands through New Guinea and its adjacent islands, and throughout the Australian mainland to Tasmania. They comprise all languages of Australasia (Oceania) not covered by phylosectors 3=Austronesian or 5=Indo-European. Zones 20= to 24= cover all so-called "Papuan" languages, spoken on Maluku and the Lesser Sunda islands and the New Guinea mainland, which have been previously treated within the "Trans-New Guinea" hypothesis: 20= ARAFURA geozone 21= MAMBERAMO geozone 22= MANDANGIC phylozone 23= OWALAMIC phylozone 24= TRANSIRIANIC phylozone Zones 25= to 27= cover all other so-called "Papuan" languages, on the New Guinea mainland, Bismarck archipelago, New Britain, New Ireland and Solomon islands, which have not been treated within the "Trans-New Guinea" hypothesis: 25= CENDRAWASIH geozone 26= SEPIK-VALLEY geozone 27= BISMARCK-SEA geozone Zones 28= to 29= cover all languages spoken traditionally across the Australian mainland, on the offshore Elcho, Howard, Crocodile and Torres Strait islands (excluding Darnley island), and formerly on the island of Tasmania. An "Australian" hypothesis covers all these languages, excluding the extinct and little known languages of Tasmania, comprising (1.) an area of more diffuse and complex relationships in the extreme north, covered here by geozone 28=, and (2.) a more closely related affinity (Pama+ Nyungan) throughout the rest of Australia, covered by 24 of the 25 sets of phylozone 29=.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity of Conservation: Exploring Narratives, Relationships and Ecosystem Services in Melanesian Market-Based Biodiversity Conservation
    THE DIVERSITY OF CONSERVATION: EXPLORING NARRATIVES, RELATIONSHIPS AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN MELANESIAN MARKET-BASED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY BRIDGET M. HENNING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, CO-ADVISOR & DR. GEORGE WEIBLEN, CO-ADVISOR OCTOBER 2014 © Bridget M. Henning 2014 Acknowledgements I am endlessly grateful to the Sogeram River communities for their cooperation, assistance, and friendship, especially the Wanang community, which took me in as their own. For their hospitality, I would like to thank Filip Damen and Maria Sepu in Wanang, Paul Mansa in Palimul, Paul and Evelyn Hangre in Munge, Catherine and Benny in Manimagi, John and Miagi in Tiklik, and Christina Sepu in Wagai. I would like to thank Clara and Yolli Agigam for helping me to learn Tok Pisin and easing my transition to village life. I appreciate the time and patience Filip Damen, Jepi Rop, Albert and Samuel Mansa, Samson Mareks, Mak Mulau, and Jori Umbang put towards teaching me about conservation. Thank you to Raymond Kuam for looking after me and to Manuel for always making sure I had enough to eat. I am indebted to the women who helped me learn to live in Wanang and taught me what it was to be good kin, especially Clara and Katie Sebo, Mugunas, Joyce, and Clara Filip, Anna Jori, Anna Sothan, Rosa Samson, Doris Samuel, Polina Nambi, and Samaras Ukiem. Special thanks to Maria Sepu for being a truly amazing woman and wonderful friend. I would like to thank the New Guinea Binatang Research Center especially Vojtech Novotny, Marcus Manumbor, Martin Mogia, Gibson Sosanika, Hans Nowatuo, Elvis Tamtiai, and Joanne Kavagu for logistical and moral support and for patiently explaining Melanesian conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea Additional Power and Electricity Information
    Papua New Guinea Additional Power and Electricity Information Source: Compiled by VisionRI from information in the National & Provincial Ten Year Power Development Plan (2007-16), PNG Power Limited, 2006, and revised based on ongoing discussions with ED-DPE, 2007-08. Distribution PPL supplies power to Port Moresby and 26 other urban centers through 19 independent power systems. Its present generating capacity is 153 MW (80 MW in Port Moresby) for total energy sales of 742 GWh (316 GWh in Port Moresby). PPL, formerly the Electricity Commission, used to be the sole generator, transmitter and distributor of electricity in the country. In 1999, an independent power producer, Hanjung Power Ltd, negotiated the production and sale of power to the grid within a 15-year build-operate-transfer (BOT) arrangement. However, the present electricity tariff of about $0.15 per kilowatt hour (kWh) is hardly sufficient to cover the cost of the diesel oil needed to produce power in Port Moresby. In rural areas the cost of diesel alone can be three times the tariff, or more. Since 2003, PPL has been earmarked for privatization and a new private commercial operator, PNG Sustainable Energy Ltd (SEL), is beginning to enter the sector. Sector Issues Lack of reliable quality power supply to the main urban areas may limit economic growth. Investments are required in power generation and the transmission and distribution grids for the Port Moresby and Ramu grids. Town electrification - Poor-quality power supply in provincial centers and lack of generation to meet growing demand is limiting economic growth in provincial urban centers not connected to the main grids.
    [Show full text]
  • National Gazette PUBLISHED by AUTHORITY (Registered at the General Post Office, Port Moresby, for Transmission by Post As a Qualified Publication) No
    National Gazette PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY (Registered at the General Post Office, Port Moresby. for transmission by post as a Qualified Publication) No. G391 PORT MORESBY, TUESDAY, 14th MAY 2019 CERTIFICATION OF ACTS It is hereby notified for general information that the Appropriation (General Public Services Expenditure 2019) Act 2018 (No. 25 of 2018) was certified by the Speaker of the National Parliament on 30th April, 2019. K. AUFA, Acting Clerk of the National Parliament. Printed and Published by M. Mala, Acting Government Printer, Port Moresby.-391. National Gazette PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY (Registered at the General Post Office, Port Moresby, for transmission by post as a Qualified Publication) No. G393 PORT MORESBY, TUESDAY, 14th MAY [2019 NOTICE OF THE MAKING OF REGULATION THE Regulation set out in the table below have been made under the Organic Law on Peace-Building in Bougainville- Autonomous Bougainville Government and Bougainvile Referendum 2002. Statutory Instrument No. Citation or Nature No. 2 of 2019 Bougainville Referendum Regulation 2019. The above Regulation shall come into operation on the 3rd of May, 2019. Copies of the Regulation may be obtained from the Office of Legislative Counsel at the following address: Office of Legislative Counsel, Department of the Prime Minister and NEC, 6th Floor, Sir Manasupe Haus, Sir John Guise Drive, P. 0. Box 639, WAIGANI, National Capital District, Telephone: (675) 3019277/301 9278/301 9284, Email: [email protected]. Dated this 14th day of May, 2019. G. SO-ON. Secretary, National Executive Council. Printed and Published by M. Mala, Acting Government Printer, Port Moresby.-393. National Gazette PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY (Registered at the General Post Office, Port Moresby, for transmission by post as a Qualified Publication) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Madang Province – Gleysol in Tuffaceous Silty Terrace Alluvium
    Papua New Guinea Forest Soil Fact Sheet no. 1 Madang province – Gleysol in tuffaceous silty terrace alluvium Site description Occurrence: Madang province on lowlands below 300 m altitude; rainfall c. 3000-4000 mm Parent Rock: Weakly consolidated silty tuffaceous Quaternary or Pliocene sediments of estuarine origin Parent Material and Landform: Silty alluvium on terraces among dissected low hills Drainage Class: Imperfectly drained Vegetation: Secondary regenerating lowland rainforest Distinguishing Soil Properties Profile features: Well-developed topsoils with weakly developed structure (peds) Silty loam to clay loam textures Light grey mottles below topsoil and grey mottles deep in the profile – may be waterlogged for short periods Chemical and physical features Medium to high exchangeable calcium and magnesium values Slightly to moderately acid Medium carbon values in topsoil Medium P retention Previous description Imperfectly drained soils of the Karamsarik and Warwin families (CSIRO Land Research Series 37, pages 83 and 84) are similar NFI reference Paia Mt profile. NFI cluster 64259 is 2.34 km northeast of profile site; see profile description for site details Paia Mt. 13 March 2016 Degradation potential Moderately erodible Prone to landslides at terrace margins Soils readily damaged and compacted by heavy machinery, particularly when wet Location Map Gogol River Kokun River Sogeram River Naru River Ramu River Site Productivity Medium to high; intensive use of site may reduce production capacity; clearing and burning may reduce productivity. Soil Management Limit machinery use in wet soil conditions; limit number of skid tracks; avoid compaction and mixing of topsoils. Gap planting with selected native species should be undertaken in degraded areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Review: Mining in the South Pacific
    Press review: Mining in the South Pacific Vol. 3, No. 3, May – June 2011, 100 pages Compilation: Dr. Roland Seib, Hobrechtstr. 28, 64285 Darmstadt, Germany http://www.roland-seib.de/mining Copyright: The material is copyrighted by the media and authors quoted. Abbreviations in common use: BCL: Bougainville Copper Limited LNG: Liquid Natural Gas PIR: Pacific Islands Report PNG: Papua New Guinea Websites: Pacific Islands Report: http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/graphics.shtml PNG Post-Courier: http://www.postcourier.com.pg PNG The National. http://www.thenational.com.pg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Australian Greens launch attack on foreign owned miners PNG Mine Watch, 29.6.2011 The Australian Greens say too much of Australia's mining profits are heading offshore and they ha- ve released a report which has found 83 per cent of Australia's mining industry is foreign-owned. The report says that in the next five years $50 billion in earnings derived from Australian mining investments will go offshore. Senator Brown wants a Resource Super Profits Tax and believes Aus- tralians would have been more supportive of the idea the first time around if they had seen the fig- ures. "I think Australians simply have been left in the dark about the rapid takeover of ownership offshore of Australia's minerals," he said. "I don't think Australians have any idea that Australia's mining industry is 83 per cent foreign owned." Senator Brown says images of Australian miners campaigning against the Government's mining taxes give a false impression of the level of local ownership of the industry. "A few local billionaires who've made a motza out of mining are covering up for the much greater profits than even they have yielded flowing overseas into the pockets of similar millionaires scat- tered around the world," he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Models for Payment Mechanisms for Forest Ecosystem Services in Papua New Guinea, Philippines and Thailand
    Final Technical Report CRRP2017-06MY-KAWASAKI Effective Models for Payment Mechanisms for Forest Ecosystem Services in Papua New Guinea, Philippines and Thailand The following collaborators worked on this project: 1. Dr. Jintana Kawasaki, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, [email protected] 2. Dr. Henry Scheyvens, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, [email protected] 3. Dr. Adcharaporn Pagdee, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, [email protected] 4. Dr. Canesio D. Predo, University of Philippines Los Banos, Philippines, [email protected] 5. Dr. Cossey K. Yosi, PNG University of Technology, Papua New Guinea, [email protected] 6. Dr. Binaya Raj Shivakoti, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, [email protected] 7. Mr. Stewart Serawe, Foundation for People and Community Development, Papua New Guinea, [email protected] 8. Mr. Mark Mameek Winai, Foundation for People and Community Development, Papua New Guinea, [email protected] 9. Mr. Isao Endo, Asian Development Bank, Philippines, [email protected] 10. Dr. Brian Johnson, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, johnson @iges.or.jp Final Report: CRRP2017 -06My-Kawasaki 0 Contract: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) 2108-11, Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Kanagawa, 240-0115, Japan Tel: +81-46-855-3700 Fax: +81-46-855-3709 E-mail: [email protected] IGES website: http://www.iges.or.jp/ APN Project: https://www.apn-gcr.org/resources/items/show/2074 Suggested Citation: Kawasaki, J. and Scheyvens, H. (Eds.). 2020. Effective Models for Payment Mechanisms for Forest Ecosystem Services in Papua New Guinea, Philippines and Thailand. Kobe, Japan: Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).
    [Show full text]
  • Black, White & Gold
    BLACK, WHITE & GOLD Goldmining in Papua New Guinea 1878–1930 BLACK, WHITE & GOLD Goldmining in Papua New Guinea 1878–1930 HANK NELSON Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Nelson, Hank, 1937-2012, author. Title: Black, white and gold : gold mining in Papua New Guinea, 1878-1930 / Hank Nelson. ISBN: 9781921934339 (paperback) 9781921934346 (ebook) Subjects: Gold mines and mining--Papua New Guinea--History. Gold miners--Papua New Guinea--History. Dewey Number: 622.3420995 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. First published 1976 by The Australian National University Reprinted © 2016 ANU Press Preface Papua New Guinean communities living on islands in the Coral Sea, near creeks feeding the major rivers of the mainland, and in villages crowded along ridge-tops in the interior, gardened and hunted over land containing gold. Most of the men who came hungry for the gold were from Australia. They carried with them the skills to obtain it and the beliefs then common among Australian working men about foreigners and blacks. Most of the diggers believed that their guns and their brains made them superior to any ‘coloured’ men. Some also thought that they were physically superior, although that was harder to believe after 1902 when the first black American won a world boxing title.
    [Show full text]