Pre-Submission (Regulation 14) Draft Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan 2019 – 2033

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pre-Submission (Regulation 14) Draft Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan 2019 – 2033 PRE-SUBMISSION (REGULATION 14) DRAFT HUNSDON AREA NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2019 – 2033 Foreword This is the Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan – a very important statutory planning document, which will affect Hunsdon and planning decisions in Hunsdon for years to come. Neighbourhood Planning is a new concept introduced by the Localism Act 2011 to allow communities, such as Hunsdon, to shape development in their areas through the production of a Neighbourhood Plan. This has been reinforced in the recent White Paper on Planning and may prove to be the only effective way for local communities to have their voices heard on planning matters that affect them. In short, all planning applications within the Parish will have to comply with this Neighbourhood Plan. This is a community initiative sponsored by Hunsdon Parish Council with additional funding from central government. Members of the local community formed a Neighbourhood Plan Group and under the Chairmanship of Frank O’Shea have worked to develop this plan with technical support from professional consultants. The Hunsdon Area designated under this Plan covers the Parish less the parts (to the south which will be village 7 and the Airfield and woodlands to the east of the parish) which fall within the Gilson Area allocated for development under the District Plan 2018. They are covered by the parallel Neighbourhood Plan with the parishes of Eastwick and Gilston, called the Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan. The vision, objectives and policies developed in this Plan are derived from the aspirations of Hunsdon residents gleaned from the household surveys and an open community event and will provide the framework governing how we all want to see Hunsdon develop over the coming years, whilst sustaining and enhancing those aspects that we cherish, all in the light of the challenges that the community faces. Our Neighbourhood Plan is a plan for our community made by our community. I wish to add my thanks on behalf of the Parish Council to Frank O’Shea and all the team in the Neighbourhood Plan Group for their hard work driving forward this initiative for the community. Bob Toll Chairman, Hunsdon Parish Council 26 .01.21 PRE-SUBMISSION Draft Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 7 THE PURPOSE OF HUNSDON AREA NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN ........................................................................ 7 THE BASIC CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................... 9 2 ABOUT THE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN AREA ........................................................................... 10 HUNSDON PARISH .......................................................................................................................... 10 HUNSDON VILLAGE & SURROUNDINGS ................................................................................................ 10 SETTLEMENT PATTERN AND THE HISTORY OF HUNSDON VILLAGE ............................................................... 11 3 SUMMARY OF PLAN PREPARATION PROCESS AND CONSULTATION ....................................... 19 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................. 19 EVIDENCE BASE OVERVIEW............................................................................................................... 20 4 VISION AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................... 22 VISION ........................................................................................................................................ 22 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................. 22 5 POLICIES AND THE POLICIES MAP .......................................................................................... 23 POLICIES MAP ............................................................................................................................... 24 6 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................... 26 PROTECTION OF THE GREEN BELT ....................................................................................................... 26 POLICY HHD1 GREEN BELT .................................................................................................................... 27 HOUSING LAND SUPPLY ................................................................................................................... 27 POLICY HHD2 HOUSING ALLOCATION ......................................................................................................... 28 SETTLEMENT PATTERN..................................................................................................................... 28 POLICY HHD3 GREEN GAP ........................................................................................................................ 28 PROVIDING FOR LOCAL HOUSING NEEDS .............................................................................................. 29 POLICY HHD5 HOUSING MIX .................................................................................................................... 31 POLICY HHD6 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ........................................................................................................ 31 DESIGN OF DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................... 31 POLICY HHD7 DESIGN CRITERIA ................................................................................................................ 34 7 ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................... 35 WILDLIFE HABITATS ........................................................................................................................ 36 .............................................................................................................................................................. 37 26 .01.21 PRE-SUBMISSION Draft Hunsdon Area Neighbourhood Plan 3 POLICY HE1 CONSERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY .................................................................. 37 LOCAL GREEN SPACE (LGS) .............................................................................................................. 37 POLICY HE2 DESIGNATED LOCAL GREEN SPACES ............................................................................................ 39 CHERISHED VIEWS .......................................................................................................................... 41 POLICY HE3 PROTECTION OF CHERISHED VIEWS ............................................................................................. 42 HEDGEROWS ................................................................................................................................. 47 POLICY HE4 VALUED HEDGEROWS ............................................................................................................. 47 HUNSDON MEAD SSSI .................................................................................................................... 49 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ..................................................................................................... 50 POLICY HE5 HUNSDON MEAD ................................................................................................................... 50 POLICY HE6 RENEWABLE ENERGY ................................................................................................................ 51 8 HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION ............................................................................................ 52 INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS AND CLUSTERS ................................................................................................ 58 POLICY HHC1 HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION ............................................................................................... 58 POLICY HHC2 NON-DESIGNATED HERITAGE ASSETS ........................................................................................ 59 9 INFRASTRUCTURE, ROADS AND TRANSPORT ......................................................................... 62 TRAFFIC IMPACT ............................................................................................................................ 63 POLICY HT1 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND MITIGATION ............................................................................................. 64 SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL ...................................................................................................................... 64 POLICY HT2 SUSTAINABLE MODES OF TRAVEL ............................................................................................... 65 10 BUSINESS ........................................................................................................................... 66 HB1 NEW BUSINESSES ............................................................................................................................... 67 11 COMMUNITY HEALTH AND WELLBEING ............................................................................... 68 RECREATION AREAS .......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Direct and Indirect Contribution Made by the Wildlife Trusts to the Health and Wellbeing of Local People
    An independent assessment for The Wildlife Trusts: by the University of Essex The direct and indirect contribution made by The Wildlife Trusts to the health and wellbeing of local people Protecting Wildlife for the Future Dr Carly Wood, Dr Mike Rogerson*, Dr Rachel Bragg, Dr Jo Barton and Professor Jules Pretty School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex Acknowledgments The authors are very grateful for the help and support given by The Wildlife Trusts staff, notably Nigel Doar, Cally Keetley and William George. All photos are courtesy of various Wildlife Trusts and are credited accordingly. Front Cover Photo credits: © Matthew Roberts Back Cover Photo credits: Small Copper Butterfly © Bob Coyle. * Correspondence contact: Mike Rogerson, Research Officer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ. [email protected] The direct and indirect contribution made by individual Wildlife Trusts on the health and wellbeing of local people Report for The Wildlife Trusts Carly Wood, Mike Rogerson*, Rachel Bragg, Jo Barton, Jules Pretty Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Background to research 8 1.2 The role of the Wildlife Trusts in promoting health and wellbeing 8 1.3 The role of the Green Exercise Research Team 9 1.4 The impact of nature on health and wellbeing 10 1.5 Nature-based activities for the general public and Green Care interventions for vulnerable people 11 1.6 Aim and objectives of this research 14 1.7 Content and structure of this report 15 2. Methodology 16 2.1 Survey of current nature-based activities run by individual Wildlife Trusts and Wildlife Trusts’ perceptions of evaluating health and wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan for CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1
    September 19 Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan FOR CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1 HUNSDON EASTWICK AND GILSTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN GROUP Contents 1. Introduction to the Neighbourhood Plan .......................................................... 5 Why have a Neighbourhood Plan? ............................................................................................ 5 Designation of the Neighbourhood Area .................................................................................. 7 Plan Preparation Process ............................................................................................................ 9 Scope of the Plan ......................................................................................................................... 9 Evidence Base .............................................................................................................................10 Key Community Concerns ........................................................................................................ 10 2. Planning Policy Framework ................................................................................... 13 What is Sustainable Development? .......................................................................................... 13 National Planning Policy Framework ....................................................................................... 14 Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission .....................................................................16 East Hertfordshire District Plan ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hundred Parishes HUNSDON
    The Hundred Parishes An introduction to HUNSDON 4 miles NW of Harlow. Ordnance Survey grid square TL4114. Postcode SG12 8NJ. Access: B180, no train station. The village is served by bus routes 351 (Hertford to Bishop‘s Stortford), C3 (Waltham Cross to Hertford or Harlow) and 5 (South End to Harlow Sats. only). County: Hertfordshire. District: East Hertfordshire. Population: 1,080 in 2011. The village of Hunsdon was registered in the Domesday Book of 1086. The village centre is dominated by the 15th-century village hall, originally a house called ’The Harlowes’ which had previously been the village school as far back as at least 1806. The hall faces one of the village’s original 5 greens, mainly now used as a pub car park but also the site of the war memorial. A number of houses in the village date back to the same period as the hall, including ’White Horses’ to the right of the village hall, while many others are of subsequent centuries. Hunsdon’s greatest claim to fame is as the site of Hunsdon House to the east of the church. The house was built in the 15th century by Sir William Oldhall, but by the 16th century the building and its extensive parks were in the hands of the Crown. Henry VIII rebuilt the house expanding it into a palatial estate in the Tudor style, complete with royal apartments and even a moat, making it into a splendid palace. Henry spent much of his leisure time at Hunsdon hunting in the well stocked deerpark. All of the King’s children lived there, Mary until her accession to the throne, Elizabeth and particularly Prince Edward.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Hydrological Survey of Hunsdon Mead Sssi – Unit 2, Roydon Mead 2015 - 2017
    ECO-HYDROLOGICAL SURVEY OF HUNSDON MEAD SSSI – UNIT 2, ROYDON MEAD 2015 - 2017 FLOODPLAIN MEADOWS PARTNERSHIP AMBASSADOR PROGRAMME SPRING VIEW OF ROYDON MEAD (2015) Sonja Kaupe Natural England June 2017 Floodplain Meadows Partnership Ambassador Programme – Hunsdon Mead Unit 2 (Roydon Mead) - 2015-2017. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roydon Mead is part of Hunsdon Mead SSSI, designated for its floodplain meadow plant communities. It is one of the remaining sites in the area still managed on the ancient Lammas system of hay making followed by winter grazing. Roydon Mead is the smaller of the two units of the SSSI and is a complex of meadows, privately owned, that seasonally flood from the Canons Brook. High nutrients levels and waterlogging have been known issues on the site and may be a threat to the existing plant communities. This 2 year study was lead as part of the Floodplain Meadow Partnership Ambassador programme. Its aim was to study the different aspects influencing the ecology of floodplain meadows, understand a site and make informed management recommendations. The conclusions of this study reinforced the known issues and hopefully underpinned it with useful data. The main grassland community still shows an interesting list of positive MG4 indicator species and indeed some part of the site display a species rich sward. Other parts of the site though suffer from the water logging and the high nutrient levels and this reflects in the plant community with a seasonal shift between an MG4c and MG15b community, both being at the higher end of both the water and fertility spectrum. Management recommendations have been made to address both issues and hopefully help the site to recover towards a species rich floodplain meadow.
    [Show full text]
  • Huguenot Merchants Settled in England 1644 Who Purchased Lincolnshire Estates in the 18Th Century, and Acquired Ayscough Estates by Marriage
    List of Parliamentary Families 51 Boucherett Origins: Huguenot merchants settled in England 1644 who purchased Lincolnshire estates in the 18th century, and acquired Ayscough estates by marriage. 1. Ayscough Boucherett – Great Grimsby 1796-1803 Seats: Stallingborough Hall, Lincolnshire (acq. by mar. c. 1700, sales from 1789, demolished first half 19th c.); Willingham Hall (House), Lincolnshire (acq. 18th c., built 1790, demolished c. 1962) Estates: Bateman 5834 (E) 7823; wealth in 1905 £38,500. Notes: Family extinct 1905 upon the death of Jessie Boucherett (in ODNB). BABINGTON Origins: Landowners at Bavington, Northumberland by 1274. William Babington had a spectacular legal career, Chief Justice of Common Pleas 1423-36. (Payling, Political Society in Lancastrian England, 36-39) Five MPs between 1399 and 1536, several kts of the shire. 1. Matthew Babington – Leicestershire 1660 2. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1685-87 1689-90 3. Philip Babington – Berwick-on-Tweed 1689-90 4. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1800-18 Seat: Rothley Temple (Temple Hall), Leicestershire (medieval, purch. c. 1550 and add. 1565, sold 1845, remod. later 19th c., hotel) Estates: Worth £2,000 pa in 1776. Notes: Four members of the family in ODNB. BACON [Frank] Bacon Origins: The first Bacon of note was son of a sheepreeve, although ancestors were recorded as early as 1286. He was a lawyer, MP 1542, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal 1558. Estates were purchased at the Dissolution. His brother was a London merchant. Eldest son created the first baronet 1611. Younger son Lord Chancellor 1618, created a viscount 1621. Eight further MPs in the 16th and 17th centuries, including kts of the shire for Norfolk and Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN May 1991
    NRA Thames 252 RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT May 1991 NRA National Rii'ers Authority Thames Region U lJ \ T lW ltS RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 1991 prepared by The National Rivers Authority Thames Region with the assistance of Land Use Consultants Flynn and Kothweii Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust Essex Wildlife Trust Lee Donaldson Associates ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 123198 A VISION FOR THE RIVER STORT CATCHMENT The river corridors of ihe Stort Catchment are a valuable natural resource, comprising sensitive ecological habitats, a landscape of considerable diversity and value, and areas which are popular for informal recreation. The Stort Navigation is of particular historical significance and its characteristics make it unique in the Thames Region. The objective of the NRA TR is to conserve and, wherever possible, enhance the value of this resource. This will be achieved through appropriate direct management of the water environment, including the provision of appropriate standards of urban flood protection, and partnership with the riparian local authorities, British Waterways Board and other interested organisations. A central part of this objective is to secure the designation of the corridor of the Lower Stort Valley and the Stort Navigation as a ’Special Heritage Area* in the statutory development plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aim of the Catchment Management Plan Under the 1989 Water Act the National Rivers Authority (NRA) is required to conserve and enhance the water environment. Such an important role requires a multi-disciplinary approach; catchment management planning seeks to provide a multi-disciplinary strategy for each catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
    Site Reference Client Name Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Roydon Marina Phase II, Roydon for: Roydon Mill Lodges LLP SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Contact Details: Enzygo Ltd. tel: +44 [0]114 231 5151 Samuel House mob: +44 [0]7545 206 122 5 Fox Valley Way email: [email protected] Stocksbridge www.enzygo.com Sheffield. S36 2AA Roydon Marina Phase II, Roydon Project: Roydon Marina Phase II: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey For: Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Status: FINAL Date: July 2015 Author: Diane Wood – Senior Ecologist MCIEEM Reviewer: Paul Beswick – Technical Director Disclaimer: This report has been produced by Enzygo Limited within the terms of the contract with the client and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Enzygo Limited Registered in England No. 6525159 Registered Office Stag House Chipping Wotton‐Under‐Edge Gloucestershire GL12 7AD SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | ii March 2016 Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation
    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow District Council Local Wildlife Site Review
    HARLOW DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2010 FINAL March 2011 EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The terms "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC), “Wildlife Sites” and “County Wildlife Site” (CoWS) used in previous reports are here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS). The term should be viewed in a national context, with “Local” referring to county level significance. Rationale It is hoped that this identification of Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners. The Essex Wildlife Trust and the Local and Unitary Authorities of Essex hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. In recent years, the existence of a Local Wildlife Site on a farm has been seen as an advantage when applying for grant-aid from agri-environment schemes, with such grants favouring areas with a proven nature conservation interest. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites in the county are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents
    Supported by Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents Introduction 3 Barn Owl 5 Otter 7 Bats 9 Stag Beetle 12 Skylark 14 Native Black Poplar 16 Water Vole 18 Great Crested Newt 20 White Clawed Crayfish 22 Dormouse 24 Further Information 26 Where You Can Learn More About the Biodiversity in the Stour Valley 37 Map of Nature Reserves and Field Centres in the Stour Valley 42 Photographic Credits Skylark Dormouse Daubenton’s Bats Water Vole FLPA – Images of Nature Stag beetle and larvae David Archer / PTES Male Great Crested Newt Herpetological Conservation Trust White Clawed Crayfish The Brecks Project Children studying fresh water life Daws Hall Centre for Environmental Education 2 Introduction The Stour Valley on the Essex / Suffolk border is home to a wide range of wildlife some of which is protected in designated sites such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Local Wildlife Sites (formerly known as County Wildlife Sites or Sites of Interest for Nature Conservation). Wildlife is also in abundance in non- designated areas throughout the Stour Valley. Within the Stour Valley lies the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). It is one of 49 AONBs within England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Each AONB is a precious landscape whose distinctive character and natural beauty are so outstanding that they have been recognised as nationally important and given additional protection and funding. The Dedham Vale, as portrayed by John Constable 200 years ago, has come to represent many peoples idea of an idyllic lowland landscape. The Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Project is a small team conserving and enhancing the special qualities of the Stour Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2017
    people’s trust for endangered species Annual review Bringing the wild back to life A voice for wildlife 01 Our mission and purpose 02 Our work 04 Message from the chair 05 Highlights in 2017 Our year abroad 15 Wildlife worldwide Our year in the UK 17 Sharing the learning 06 Mammals Our people 08 Hedgehogs 18 Standing up for wildlife 09 Dormice 18 Volunteers 10 Water voles 19 Partners 11 Invertebrates 19 Our trustees 12 Restoring landscapes 20 Financial supporters 12 Ancient woodland 13 Traditional orchards Finance & fundraising 14 Woodpasture and parklands 21 How we raised our money 14 Hedgerows 21 How we spent our money A voice for wildlife 01 Our mission To save our wildlife for the future. Our purpose Our wildlife is disappearing. Almost two thirds of species in the UK have declined in the past 50 years. Over 65,000 species are on the international alert list. There’s nothing natural or inevitable about this. It can be stopped. And we can all play a part. That’s why People’s Trust for Endangered Species exists. A voice for wildlife Scientific research © Little Fireface Project © Amanda Korstjens Amanda © Conservation action Education and awareness raising © PTES © Our work We live and breathe wildlife. Our passion drives our work. It’s what gives some of our most threatened species a chance to survive. 02 – 03 So how do we do this? Scientific research Conserving endangered species and the places where they live is a huge task. To have long-term impact we make our limited resources work as hard as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation to Climate Change Sustainable Local Economies Abundant Wildlife Healthy Cities and Green Space for All
    A living landscape A call to restore the UK’s battered ecosystems, for wildlife and people Adaptation to climate change Sustainable local economies Abundant wildlife Healthy cities and green space for all Updated with 100+ Living Landscape schemes So much of the UK now is packed with development Fenton/BBC Beatrice and wildlife is in retreat. There are many fine nature A LIVING LANDSCAPE reserves but our future must be to integrate human and natural communities and restore a better balance. This document lays out exciting and important new plans. Professor Aubrey Manning OBE President of The Wildlife Trusts Matthew Roberts. Cover picture: St Ives and the river Great Ouse, Cambridgshire, Dae Sasitorn/lastrefuge.co.uk Dae Cambridgshire, Ouse, Great river the and Ives St picture: Cover Roberts. Matthew Where will our water come from? When will our land use become truly sustainable? How can our environment adapt to climate change? What would it take to rebuild a wildlife-rich countryside? Why are so many people disconnected from nature? Priestcliffe Lees nature reserve, owned by Derbyshire Wildlife Trust: a treasure chest of local biodiversity. The Wildlife Trusts see such places as nodes from It’s time to think big which plants and animals can recolonise a recovering landscape To adapt to climate change, the UK’s wildlife will need to move Driven by local people and aspirations, The Wildlife Trusts play along ‘climate corridors’ up and down the country, or to shadier a leading role not just in developing the vision but in mustering slopes or cooler valleys. Wildlife has done it all before, after the the support that can allow communities to drive their own last ice age, but this time the change is faster and there are change.
    [Show full text]