DOCSLIB.ORG

Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Site Reference Client Name Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Roydon Marina Phase II, Roydon for: Roydon Mill Lodges LLP SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Contact Details: Enzygo Ltd. tel: +44 [0]114 231 5151 Samuel House mob: +44 [0]7545 206 122 5 Fox Valley Way email: [email protected] Stocksbridge www.enzygo.com Sheffield. S36 2AA Roydon Marina Phase II, Roydon Project: Roydon Marina Phase II: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey For: Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Status: FINAL Date: July 2015 Author: Diane Wood – Senior Ecologist MCIEEM Reviewer: Paul Beswick – Technical Director Disclaimer: This report has been produced by Enzygo Limited within the terms of the contract with the client and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Enzygo Limited Registered in England No. 6525159 Registered Office Stag House Chipping Wotton‐Under‐Edge Gloucestershire GL12 7AD SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | ii March 2016 Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 6 3.0 Results ................................................................................................................ 10 Desk Study .................................................................................................................. 10 Survey Results ............................................................................................................. 16 4.0 Ecological Impacts and Recommendations ........................................................ 21 5.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................. 27 6.0 References ......................................................................................................... 29 7.0 Appendix A – Extended Phase 1 Habitat Map .................................................... 31 8.0 Appendix B – Biodiversity Legislation ................................................................ 32 9.0 Appendix C ‐ Target Notes and Photographs ..................................................... 38 10.0 Appendix D ‐ Bat Roost Assessment Criteria [Hundt, L. 2012] ........................... 43 Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Executive Summary i. A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal [PEA] which comprised of an Extended Phase 1 habitat survey was carried out for the proposed extension of the existing Roydon Marina at Roydon, Essex. ii. A desk study and an extended Phase 1 habitat field survey were carried out to identify habitats and the potential for the site to support protected/notable species. iii. The desk study found that the internationally designated Lee Valley Ramsar, Special Protection Area [SPA] and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] site is ~160m to the west of the site. There are three Local Wildlife Sites [LWS] within ~60m‐640m of the site. iv. The field survey was carried out on the 12th May 2015 [updated in March 2016] and found within the site boundary were ten [10] different habitats. v. Recommendations are made in Chapters 4 and 5 of this report and include the following receptors: Statutory Sites; Non‐statutory Sites; Breeding Birds; Wintering Birds; Bats; Water Voles; Site clearance; and Invasive Species. SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | 3 March 2016 Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Enzygo Ltd was commissioned by Roydon Mill Lodges LLP, to conduct an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey of the proposed extension of Roydon Marina. The marina is located at Roydon Marina Village, Roydon, Essex, CM19 5EJ [hereafter referred to as ‘the site’]. The boundaries of the site are shown in Appendix A: Figure 1. The approximate central Ordnance Survey national grid reference for the site is 539625, 209914. The purpose of this report is to support a planning application for an extension to the existing marina at the site. 1.2 Site Location and Description 1.2.1 The site is situated in the town of Roydon, Essex approximately 3km to the west of Harlow. There are three main rivers within the immediate vicinity of the site; the River Stort is located approximately 60m to the north of the site, the River Stort [Navigation] located approximately 30m to the south of the site and Mill Stream located 20m to the south of the site. An ordinary watercourse flows along the western boundary of the site in a northerly direction and connects into the marina in the North West corner. The London Liverpool Street to Cambridge rail line is adjacent to the northern boundary of the site with a sewage works to the north of it. Surrounding the western and southern boundaries of the site is agricultural land. To the east is Roydon Marina Village 1.2.2 The site is approximately 5.6ha in size. 1.3 Development Proposals 1.3.1 It is understood the proposal is for the extension of the existing Roydon Marina, with the additional of 240 berth with the capacity for both narrow boats and wide berth boats and associated; ‘Elsan’ [chemical toilet] points, refuse collection facilities, and an extension to the facilities building to provide additional shower facilities. The proposal would also include associated car parking for approximately 100+ cars and a new bound gravel access road. 1.4 Survey and Reporting Aims and Objectives 1.4.1 The ecological investigations undertaken by Enzygo included the following: A desk study to obtain existing information on statutory and non‐statutory sites of nature conservation interest, and records of protected/notable species within the site and its environs; SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | 4 March 2016 Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP An extended Phase 1 habitat survey involving a walkover of the site to record habitat types and dominant vegetation, including any invasive species, and a reconnaissance survey for evidence of protected fauna or habitats capable of supporting such species; An investigation of any buildings or built structures and trees for their potential to support bats; and An assessment of the potential ecological constraints to the proposed works at the site and recommendations for further survey, avoidance, mitigation, and enhancement where appropriate. SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | 5 March 2016 Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Desk Study 2.1.1 Information was obtained from Essex Ecology Services Ltd. [EECOS], the ecological records centre for Essex, Hertfordshire Environmental Records Centre [HERC] regarding the presence of nature conservation designations and protected and notable species within 2km of the proposed development site. In addition, a search for designations was made of the web‐based MAGIC [Multi Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside] database. 2.1.2 The data search covers: Statutory nature conservation designations, such as National Nature Reserves and Sites of Special Scientific Interest; Non‐statutory nature conservation designations, such as Wildlife Sites; Protected species, such as badgers Meles meles, great crested newts Triturus cristatus and bat species; and Notable species, such as those listed in the UK and local Biodiversity Action Plan. 2.1.3 Please note that Tree Preservation Orders [TPOs] and Conservation Area designations have not been checked as part of the desk study or extended Phase 1 habitat survey and are not considered further in this report. 2.2 Surveyor Details 2.2.1. The desk study, report and the site survey were conducted by Diane Wood MCIEEM [Enzygo Senior Ecologist]. 2.3 Survey Methodology 2.3.1 An extended Phase 1 habitat survey was conducted within the site boundary [See Appendix A] on the 12th May 2015. In addition, the habitats around the edges of the lake that were outside of the site boundary were surveyed, to give a wider picture of the lake as a whole and to evaluate the habitats in this area should they need to be included in any mitigation that may be required. All areas of the site were investigated and as recommended by English Nature’s Badgers and Development [2002] guidance document, a 30m buffer around the site was investigated for evidence of badger activity where access was possible. 2.4 Habitats 2.4.1 The vegetation and habitat types within the site were noted during the walkover survey in accordance with the categories specified for a Phase 1 Vegetation and Habitat Survey [Joint SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | 6 March 2016 Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Nature Conservation Committee, 2010]. Dominant plant species were recorded for each habitat present. 2.5 Protected and Notable Species 2.5.1 The site was inspected for evidence of and its potential to support protected or notable species, especially those listed under the Conservation of Habitats
Recommended publications
  • The Direct and Indirect Contribution Made by the Wildlife Trusts to the Health and Wellbeing of Local People

    The Direct and Indirect Contribution Made by the Wildlife Trusts to the Health and Wellbeing of Local People

    An independent assessment for The Wildlife Trusts: by the University of Essex The direct and indirect contribution made by The Wildlife Trusts to the health and wellbeing of local people Protecting Wildlife for the Future Dr Carly Wood, Dr Mike Rogerson*, Dr Rachel Bragg, Dr Jo Barton and Professor Jules Pretty School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex Acknowledgments The authors are very grateful for the help and support given by The Wildlife Trusts staff, notably Nigel Doar, Cally Keetley and William George. All photos are courtesy of various Wildlife Trusts and are credited accordingly. Front Cover Photo credits: © Matthew Roberts Back Cover Photo credits: Small Copper Butterfly © Bob Coyle. * Correspondence contact: Mike Rogerson, Research Officer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ. [email protected] The direct and indirect contribution made by individual Wildlife Trusts on the health and wellbeing of local people Report for The Wildlife Trusts Carly Wood, Mike Rogerson*, Rachel Bragg, Jo Barton, Jules Pretty Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Background to research 8 1.2 The role of the Wildlife Trusts in promoting health and wellbeing 8 1.3 The role of the Green Exercise Research Team 9 1.4 The impact of nature on health and wellbeing 10 1.5 Nature-based activities for the general public and Green Care interventions for vulnerable people 11 1.6 Aim and objectives of this research 14 1.7 Content and structure of this report 15 2. Methodology 16 2.1 Survey of current nature-based activities run by individual Wildlife Trusts and Wildlife Trusts’ perceptions of evaluating health and wellbeing.
  • BGS Report, Single Column Layout

    BGS Report, Single Column Layout

    INDUSTRIAL CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS AND CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE POTENTIAL IN THE UK Report No. COAL R308 DTI/Pub URN 06/2027 October 2006 Contractor British Geological Survey Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)115 936 3100 By S. Holloway C.J. Vincent K.L. Kirk The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Carbon Abatement Technologies Programme. The DTI programme is managed by Future Energy Solutions. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI or Future Energy Solutions First published 2006 © DTI 2006 Foreword This report is the product of a study by the British Geological Survey (BGS) undertaken for AEA Technology plc as part of agreement C/07/00384/00/00. It considers the UK emissions of carbon dioxide from large industrial point sources such as power stations and the potential geological storage capacity to safely and securely store these emissions. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the UK DTI for funding the work, and Dr Erik Lindeberg of Sintef Petroleum Research for provision of a programme to calculate the density of CO2. Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................i Contents...........................................................................................................................................i
  • Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007

    Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007

    Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Index Page number Welcome 2 Performance Summary 2007 3 Managing our Responsibilities Our Approach 6 Governance 7 Environment 8 Stakeholder Engagement 11 Scope 12 Benchmarking and Recognition 13 Our 12 Impacts 15 Provision of Energy 16 Health and Safety 25 Customer Experience 35 Climate Change and Emissions to Air 43 Waste and Resource Use 52 Biodiversity 62 Sites, Siting and Infrastructure 70 Employment Experience 75 Customers with Special Circumstances 88 Community 94 Procurement 107 Economic 113 Assurance Statement 116 Page 1 of 118 www.scottishpower.com/CorporateResponsibility.asp Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Welcome 2007 was a landmark year for our business with the successful integration of ScottishPower and IBERDROLA. The new enlarged IBERDROLA Group ended 2007 as one of the worlds largest electricity companies by market capitalisation. Through the friendly integration, now successfully completed, we have reinforced our shared commitment to Corporate Responsibility. Our reporting year has been aligned to IBERDROLA so going forward we will be working on a calendar year basis. Achieving Scottish Business in the Community Large Company of the Year in 2007 was an important endorsement for ScottishPowers work and to our commitment to environmental and social issues. During 2007, we have announced significant investments in sustainable generation projects and environmental technologies; increased our 2010 target for delivery of wind energy projects in the UK to 1,200 MW and established partnerships that will help secure Scotlands place as the world leader in marine energy. In addition, we announced the UKs largest energy crop project and embarked on a major study into cleaner coal generation.
  • RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN May 1991

    RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN May 1991

    NRA Thames 252 RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT May 1991 NRA National Rii'ers Authority Thames Region U lJ \ T lW ltS RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 1991 prepared by The National Rivers Authority Thames Region with the assistance of Land Use Consultants Flynn and Kothweii Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust Essex Wildlife Trust Lee Donaldson Associates ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 123198 A VISION FOR THE RIVER STORT CATCHMENT The river corridors of ihe Stort Catchment are a valuable natural resource, comprising sensitive ecological habitats, a landscape of considerable diversity and value, and areas which are popular for informal recreation. The Stort Navigation is of particular historical significance and its characteristics make it unique in the Thames Region. The objective of the NRA TR is to conserve and, wherever possible, enhance the value of this resource. This will be achieved through appropriate direct management of the water environment, including the provision of appropriate standards of urban flood protection, and partnership with the riparian local authorities, British Waterways Board and other interested organisations. A central part of this objective is to secure the designation of the corridor of the Lower Stort Valley and the Stort Navigation as a ’Special Heritage Area* in the statutory development plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aim of the Catchment Management Plan Under the 1989 Water Act the National Rivers Authority (NRA) is required to conserve and enhance the water environment. Such an important role requires a multi-disciplinary approach; catchment management planning seeks to provide a multi-disciplinary strategy for each catchment.
  • 160314 08A Future Direction of the Residual Waste Treatment

    160314 08A Future Direction of the Residual Waste Treatment

    Appendices Appendix 1 – Key Planning considerations The Site The Site covers an area of around 5.6 hectares, is currently owned by Tarmac (previously Lafarge Aggregates Ltd) and is an existing industrial site with planning permission to operate an asphalt coating plant, an aggregates railhead and a ready- mixed concrete plant. Aggregates are primarily brought into the Site via the rail siding which forms part of the Site. Road access to the Site is via Ratty’s Lane. Ratty’s Lane leads to the A10 Dinant Link Road via Essex Road. The Site is bordered to the south by Rye House Power Station. The River Lee borders the site to the east and north. A railway line (which serves the rail siding within the site) borders the western site boundary and runs north east to south west. The Site is situated in the eastern part of a heavily industrialised area to the east of the town of Hoddesdon. There is parkland to the east of the Site, with agricultural land beyond this. Parkland and some light industrial premises are located to the north of the Site beyond the River Lee, with light industry to the west and residential properties beyond this. Parkland, light industry, the River Lee and residential properties are situated to the south of the Site. Approximately 100m to the north of the boundary of the Site, beyond the railway line and across the River Lee, is Rye House Kart Club track. Rye House Speedway Stadium lies further to the north, approximately 300m from the boundary of the Site.
  • Sustainability Summary 2012

    Sustainability Summary 2012

    Contents 1. Introduction 1 5. Social 46 Welcome 2 Highlights 47 About this Summary 3 Our Workplace 48 Our Year in Summary - Highlights 4 Overview & Management Approach 48 About Us 7 Performance 50 Stakeholder Engagement 8 Employee Health, 50 Safety & Wellbeing Benchmarking & Recognition 10 Learning & Development 53 2. Governance 11 Employee Benefits 55 How We Manage CSR 16 Employee Relations 57 3. Economic 17 Our Marketplace 58 Highlights & Management Approach 18 Overview & Management Approach 58 Performance 19 Performance 59 Key Financial Results 19 Our Markets 59 Investment 20 Pricing & Product Innovation 59 Energy Prices & Regulation 21 Sales & Marketing 61 4. Environment 22 Customer Information 61 Highlights 23 Customer Service 62 Policy, Organisation 23 Social Programmes 66 & Management System Plant Reliability & 70 Management Focus on 25 Energy Security Environmental Indicators Supply Chain 71 Performance 28 Our Communities 74 Materials 28 Overview & Management Approach 74 Energy 28 Performance 77 Water 30 Project Development 77 Biodiversity 31 Community Investment 78 Emissions, Effluents 40 & Wastes Community Programmes 78 Volunteering & Fundraising 86 Cancer Research UK 88 Introduction 1 Welcome Welcome to ScottishPower’s Sustainability Summary 2012. 1,200MW East Anglia ONE offshore wind development, in partnership with Vattenfall, provide the potential to As part of the Iberdrola Group our generate green energy on a significant scale by 2020. focus is on building a strong and At the same time as pioneering these new, large-scale technologies, we are repowering two of our oldest commercially successful business, and smallest windfarms in Cornwall and Lancashire with sustainability at the heart of our with modern turbines, to improve their efficiency and output.
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

    Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
  • Harlow District Council Local Wildlife Site Review

    Harlow District Council Local Wildlife Site Review

    HARLOW DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2010 FINAL March 2011 EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The terms "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC), “Wildlife Sites” and “County Wildlife Site” (CoWS) used in previous reports are here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS). The term should be viewed in a national context, with “Local” referring to county level significance. Rationale It is hoped that this identification of Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners. The Essex Wildlife Trust and the Local and Unitary Authorities of Essex hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. In recent years, the existence of a Local Wildlife Site on a farm has been seen as an advantage when applying for grant-aid from agri-environment schemes, with such grants favouring areas with a proven nature conservation interest. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites in the county are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times.
  • Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents

    Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents

    Supported by Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents Introduction 3 Barn Owl 5 Otter 7 Bats 9 Stag Beetle 12 Skylark 14 Native Black Poplar 16 Water Vole 18 Great Crested Newt 20 White Clawed Crayfish 22 Dormouse 24 Further Information 26 Where You Can Learn More About the Biodiversity in the Stour Valley 37 Map of Nature Reserves and Field Centres in the Stour Valley 42 Photographic Credits Skylark Dormouse Daubenton’s Bats Water Vole FLPA – Images of Nature Stag beetle and larvae David Archer / PTES Male Great Crested Newt Herpetological Conservation Trust White Clawed Crayfish The Brecks Project Children studying fresh water life Daws Hall Centre for Environmental Education 2 Introduction The Stour Valley on the Essex / Suffolk border is home to a wide range of wildlife some of which is protected in designated sites such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Local Wildlife Sites (formerly known as County Wildlife Sites or Sites of Interest for Nature Conservation). Wildlife is also in abundance in non- designated areas throughout the Stour Valley. Within the Stour Valley lies the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). It is one of 49 AONBs within England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Each AONB is a precious landscape whose distinctive character and natural beauty are so outstanding that they have been recognised as nationally important and given additional protection and funding. The Dedham Vale, as portrayed by John Constable 200 years ago, has come to represent many peoples idea of an idyllic lowland landscape. The Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Project is a small team conserving and enhancing the special qualities of the Stour Valley.
  • Annual Review 2017

    Annual Review 2017

    people’s trust for endangered species Annual review Bringing the wild back to life A voice for wildlife 01 Our mission and purpose 02 Our work 04 Message from the chair 05 Highlights in 2017 Our year abroad 15 Wildlife worldwide Our year in the UK 17 Sharing the learning 06 Mammals Our people 08 Hedgehogs 18 Standing up for wildlife 09 Dormice 18 Volunteers 10 Water voles 19 Partners 11 Invertebrates 19 Our trustees 12 Restoring landscapes 20 Financial supporters 12 Ancient woodland 13 Traditional orchards Finance & fundraising 14 Woodpasture and parklands 21 How we raised our money 14 Hedgerows 21 How we spent our money A voice for wildlife 01 Our mission To save our wildlife for the future. Our purpose Our wildlife is disappearing. Almost two thirds of species in the UK have declined in the past 50 years. Over 65,000 species are on the international alert list. There’s nothing natural or inevitable about this. It can be stopped. And we can all play a part. That’s why People’s Trust for Endangered Species exists. A voice for wildlife Scientific research © Little Fireface Project © Amanda Korstjens Amanda © Conservation action Education and awareness raising © PTES © Our work We live and breathe wildlife. Our passion drives our work. It’s what gives some of our most threatened species a chance to survive. 02 – 03 So how do we do this? Scientific research Conserving endangered species and the places where they live is a huge task. To have long-term impact we make our limited resources work as hard as possible.
  • Adaptation to Climate Change Sustainable Local Economies Abundant Wildlife Healthy Cities and Green Space for All

    Adaptation to Climate Change Sustainable Local Economies Abundant Wildlife Healthy Cities and Green Space for All

    A living landscape A call to restore the UK’s battered ecosystems, for wildlife and people Adaptation to climate change Sustainable local economies Abundant wildlife Healthy cities and green space for all Updated with 100+ Living Landscape schemes So much of the UK now is packed with development Fenton/BBC Beatrice and wildlife is in retreat. There are many fine nature A LIVING LANDSCAPE reserves but our future must be to integrate human and natural communities and restore a better balance. This document lays out exciting and important new plans. Professor Aubrey Manning OBE President of The Wildlife Trusts Matthew Roberts. Cover picture: St Ives and the river Great Ouse, Cambridgshire, Dae Sasitorn/lastrefuge.co.uk Dae Cambridgshire, Ouse, Great river the and Ives St picture: Cover Roberts. Matthew Where will our water come from? When will our land use become truly sustainable? How can our environment adapt to climate change? What would it take to rebuild a wildlife-rich countryside? Why are so many people disconnected from nature? Priestcliffe Lees nature reserve, owned by Derbyshire Wildlife Trust: a treasure chest of local biodiversity. The Wildlife Trusts see such places as nodes from It’s time to think big which plants and animals can recolonise a recovering landscape To adapt to climate change, the UK’s wildlife will need to move Driven by local people and aspirations, The Wildlife Trusts play along ‘climate corridors’ up and down the country, or to shadier a leading role not just in developing the vision but in mustering slopes or cooler valleys. Wildlife has done it all before, after the the support that can allow communities to drive their own last ice age, but this time the change is faster and there are change.
  • Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre Metadata Statement

    Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre Metadata Statement

    Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre Metadata Statement 1. Overview Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre collates and manages species Biological Records Centre and habitat data for Essex both from within its reserves, and for the wider Abbotts Hall Farm landscape. We also work with partner organisations to collate and disseminate Great Wigborough other datasets for Essex. We do not hold all data for Essex, and therefore to obtain Colchester, Essex CO5 7RZ complete datasets for Essex it may be necessary to contact other organisations that Tel 01621 862999 also hold data for the area we cover. More details are below. E-mail [email protected] If you notice any inaccuracies or omissions in the data provided please contact us. Website www.essexwtrecords.org.uk 2. Temporal Coverage Please see the table below for details of individual taxonomic groups, and the metadata supplied with ArcGIS mapping files for information on the date that individual layers were last modified. The protected species dataset supplied by Essex Wildlife Trust will usually cover the last 15 years prior to supply as a minimum, older data is available on request. 3. Geographical Coverage The geographic area covered by Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre includes: • The modern administrative County of Essex; • Unitary authorities within the historic County of Essex (Southend-on-Sea Borough Council and Thurrock Council); • Vice-Counties 18 (South Essex) and 19 (North Essex); excluding any areas outside the modern county of Essex, which will be covered by the relevant LERC for that county. • Maritime extensions of Vice-Counties 18 and 19 to the 12 mile limit.