DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Review 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Review 2018 Essex Wildlife Trust Annual Review 2018 Our wildest year so far Protecting Wildlife for the Future and for the People of Essex A year of success It gives me an enormous sense of pride to look back on 2018 – our wildest years so far. With the uncertainty in the wider world showing no sign of resolution, it is important that we continue to deliver against our organisational objectives, conserving and managing habitats, whilst engaging people in the wonders of wildlife – and ensuring that those in positions of authority know what we can achieve for our beautiful county. We took part in a national Wildlife Trusts parliamentary reception, focusing on the contribution that young people can make to environmental conservation, which gave us the chance to discuss our work with a number of Essex MPs. Nationally, the Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts is working in partnership with other leading ‘green’ charities, to influence key developments, such as a new Environment Act and future farm subsidy regimes. Locally, we can advance our position, talking to politicians, landowners and other leading individuals. We cannot win the fight on our own and need to build strong partnerships if we are to make a real difference for wildlife in Essex. Our media work is a great way of getting our messages out to a wide audience. We are fortunate to receive excellent coverage with local TV and radio stations, but only because our reputation is so positive. Our staff show great professionalism, knowledge and enthusiasm in front of the camera and behind the microphone. It’s much appreciated. These thanks extend, of course, to our staff across the organisation, whether working out on a reserve, teaching a group of young people, serving teas in a café or undertaking key jobs at our Abbotts Hall Farm HQ. And especially to our fantastic volunteers, who give so much to the Trust. Each and every one of you should be very proud of your contribution, for which we are tremendously grateful. Stewart Goshawk Cover picture, Dormouse. Ian Pratt Main picture, Ray island. Chair, Essex Wildlife Trust Dave Watts Peter Clayton 2 Essex Wildlife Trust | Annual Review 2018 With more land, more projects, Protecting and more support from volunteers, it’s been a busy year for conservation in Essex. wildlife One of the surest ways to extend our work is to increase the amount of land that we own and manage. We have completed the successful purchase of a further addition to our Wrabness and wild reserve to expand the wet grassland habitat and have also taken on the management of Thurrock Marshes, an SSSI site which is unique in the Thames Gateway for its biodiversity. Its superb places mosaic of habitats includes nationally important collections of invertebrates. Another way that we protect wildlife is by using our influence, with our focus increasingly on landscape- scale projects. We have continued to advise on proposed National Infrastructure projects such as the Lower Thames Crossing, Tilbury-2, and Bradwell Nuclear Power Station. We have also led on the development of the Blackwater Initiative to advance collaboration between ourselves, the RSPB, the National Trust, Maldon District Council and Essex and Suffolk Water. Outputs have already included an ambitious joint Wader Strategy. Volunteers continue to be the backbone of our work. Our Coastal Warden scheme has gone from strength to strength with the recruitment of over 30 new volunteer Coastal Wardens. We’ve expanded our data collection and continued to build on our relationship with the Environment Agency and Anglian Water, while over 50 volunteers have been working with us on Shoresearch surveys to collect much needed coastal biological records. We have continued to build on our flagship projects such as the Essex Barn Owl project and the Brent Goose satellite tagging project, the latter of which is helping us to unlock the migration behaviours of this key Essex bird species. We have also been working with the Environment Agency to trial the installation and monitoring of ‘saltmarsh sausages’ at Abbotts Hall Farm. These are large coir rolls which trap sediment and allow establishment of saltmarsh vegetation to tackle erosion. Increasingly, our work extends into urban areas and road systems. Following the discovery of a dormouse population on sections of the A12 verges, we have been planning habitat improvements with the Highways Agency. But we haven’t forgotten the countryside. Working with landowners in the Danbury area, we have planted 2.5km of mixed species hedgerow to improve connectivity for wildlife. This is just one of many examples of such activity. Your help is fundamental in allowing us to undertake this important work and fulfil our mission to protect wildlife. Thank you for your support. Essex Wildlife Trust | Annual Review 2018 3 Inspiring the people of Essex On the cusp of turning 60, we’ve educated 60,000 children in a single year – not to mention adults of all ages. Amazing. Our aim is to be the flagship provider for learning through nature in Essex. At the heart of our education strategy is the commitment to building a talented team of educators, reaching people at all stages of life, and raising the profile of the Trust as a leading environmental educator. This is underpinned by the principles and practices of sustainable development and biodiversity conservation. We are delighted to have been awarded the Quality Badge by the Council for Learning Outside the Classroom for education at schools and centres delivered by our wonderful Educations Team. The Quality Badge is a national award, combining the two essential elements of high-quality provision – learning and safety – into one trusted accreditation scheme that serves as a kitemark for potential clients. This year has seen us exceed our targets for quantity as well as quality, reaching over 60,000 children through our education programmes. We have the largest Education Team of all the Wildlife Trusts, with every member of staff committed to positioning Essex at the forefront of environmental education. Responding to the tide of public concern about the harm of plastics in both land and sea, we created a pioneering new ‘Plasticology’ workshop programme to explore the problems (and solutions) of plastic rubbish in Essex. Plasticology has been a big hit with schools, and some workshops have been generously funded by our corporate partners. Our early years sessions go from strength to strength, with a growing following of loyal parents and children who attend every week to learn about wildlife through the seasons. This year saw the programme successfully rebranded as Nature Tots, complete with logo, organic cotton tee shirts, bags, and more. We also began exploring the potential of having our very own outdoor- based Nature Nursery. This pioneering work in early years provision should see nursery children benefitting from year- round interaction with the natural environment. Watch this space. Meanwhile, our accredited training programme for educators, which includes Forest Schools, Coastal Schools and Outdoor Learning practices, has continued to build, enabling us to train others to educate children through interaction with wildlife and the natural environment. We now have eleven education staff trained as Forest School leaders and two members of the education team are on the Essex Forest School Association Steering Group. Your support has allowed us to reach more people than ever this year, covering all areas of Essex and spanning the generations. Let’s achieve even more next year. 4 Essex Wildlife Trust | Annual Review 2018 This year saw a huge increase in Delivering our press coverage and substantial growth in our online community. More voices for wildlife. a greater Our number of supporters across Facebook, Twitter and Instagram has increased by 9,000, bringing our total followers to 31,000. This growth was particularly notable on Instagram with a 138% increase in followers, extending voice for our reach to a younger demographic. The Essex Wildlife Trust Community Facebook Group was also created, allowing our supporters to interact with one another. Our social media followers helped us deliver a greater wildlife voice for wildlife in many ways, particularly by promoting our key campaigns. One example was the potential loss of protection for Local Wildlife Sites through the Government’s new National Planning Policy Framework, which would have left 12,500 hectares unprotected in Essex. Our campaign video had 23,000 views and 900 shares. Alongside the efforts of other Wildlife Trusts, the campaign led the Government to publish a revised version that reinstated protection for Local Wildlife Sites. June saw the return of our annual 30 Days Wild campaign, calling on everyone to do something wild every day in June. There were 2,200 sign-ups in Essex, including 232 schools and 65 businesses, an increase of 37%. Research shows that 30 Days Wild helps to improve people’s connection to nature and increases the likelihood of them actively helping to protect nature. We produced a video every day in June, offering activity ideas and showcasing our wildlife and nature reserves, attracting more than 54,000 views. Our number of television appearances more than doubled, with national features on ITV This Morning, BBC Countryfile, BBC’s The One Show, Channel 5 news and Forces TV, promoting our conservation work to millions of viewers. These national appearances were alongside regular features on regional television, including BBC Look East, ITV Anglia and BBC Inside Out. We also featured frequently on the radio. We talked nationally about water voles on BBC Radio 4’s ‘Nature Notes’ and the ecology of wood mice on BBC Radio 5, while our Help for Heroes collaboration featured on the British Forces Broadcasting Service. Locally, we featured on BBC Essex once every 13 days on average, informing listeners of species spectacles, events, campaigns and local projects.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Direct and Indirect Contribution Made by the Wildlife Trusts to the Health and Wellbeing of Local People
    An independent assessment for The Wildlife Trusts: by the University of Essex The direct and indirect contribution made by The Wildlife Trusts to the health and wellbeing of local people Protecting Wildlife for the Future Dr Carly Wood, Dr Mike Rogerson*, Dr Rachel Bragg, Dr Jo Barton and Professor Jules Pretty School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex Acknowledgments The authors are very grateful for the help and support given by The Wildlife Trusts staff, notably Nigel Doar, Cally Keetley and William George. All photos are courtesy of various Wildlife Trusts and are credited accordingly. Front Cover Photo credits: © Matthew Roberts Back Cover Photo credits: Small Copper Butterfly © Bob Coyle. * Correspondence contact: Mike Rogerson, Research Officer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ. [email protected] The direct and indirect contribution made by individual Wildlife Trusts on the health and wellbeing of local people Report for The Wildlife Trusts Carly Wood, Mike Rogerson*, Rachel Bragg, Jo Barton, Jules Pretty Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Background to research 8 1.2 The role of the Wildlife Trusts in promoting health and wellbeing 8 1.3 The role of the Green Exercise Research Team 9 1.4 The impact of nature on health and wellbeing 10 1.5 Nature-based activities for the general public and Green Care interventions for vulnerable people 11 1.6 Aim and objectives of this research 14 1.7 Content and structure of this report 15 2. Methodology 16 2.1 Survey of current nature-based activities run by individual Wildlife Trusts and Wildlife Trusts’ perceptions of evaluating health and wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN May 1991
    NRA Thames 252 RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT May 1991 NRA National Rii'ers Authority Thames Region U lJ \ T lW ltS RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 1991 prepared by The National Rivers Authority Thames Region with the assistance of Land Use Consultants Flynn and Kothweii Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust Essex Wildlife Trust Lee Donaldson Associates ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 123198 A VISION FOR THE RIVER STORT CATCHMENT The river corridors of ihe Stort Catchment are a valuable natural resource, comprising sensitive ecological habitats, a landscape of considerable diversity and value, and areas which are popular for informal recreation. The Stort Navigation is of particular historical significance and its characteristics make it unique in the Thames Region. The objective of the NRA TR is to conserve and, wherever possible, enhance the value of this resource. This will be achieved through appropriate direct management of the water environment, including the provision of appropriate standards of urban flood protection, and partnership with the riparian local authorities, British Waterways Board and other interested organisations. A central part of this objective is to secure the designation of the corridor of the Lower Stort Valley and the Stort Navigation as a ’Special Heritage Area* in the statutory development plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aim of the Catchment Management Plan Under the 1989 Water Act the National Rivers Authority (NRA) is required to conserve and enhance the water environment. Such an important role requires a multi-disciplinary approach; catchment management planning seeks to provide a multi-disciplinary strategy for each catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
    Site Reference Client Name Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Roydon Marina Phase II, Roydon for: Roydon Mill Lodges LLP SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Roydon Mill Marina Phase II Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Contact Details: Enzygo Ltd. tel: +44 [0]114 231 5151 Samuel House mob: +44 [0]7545 206 122 5 Fox Valley Way email: [email protected] Stocksbridge www.enzygo.com Sheffield. S36 2AA Roydon Marina Phase II, Roydon Project: Roydon Marina Phase II: Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey For: Roydon Mill Lodges LLP Status: FINAL Date: July 2015 Author: Diane Wood – Senior Ecologist MCIEEM Reviewer: Paul Beswick – Technical Director Disclaimer: This report has been produced by Enzygo Limited within the terms of the contract with the client and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Enzygo Limited Registered in England No. 6525159 Registered Office Stag House Chipping Wotton‐Under‐Edge Gloucestershire GL12 7AD SHF.202.004.EC.R.001.A Page | ii March 2016 Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation
    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow District Council Local Wildlife Site Review
    HARLOW DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2010 FINAL March 2011 EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The terms "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC), “Wildlife Sites” and “County Wildlife Site” (CoWS) used in previous reports are here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS). The term should be viewed in a national context, with “Local” referring to county level significance. Rationale It is hoped that this identification of Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners. The Essex Wildlife Trust and the Local and Unitary Authorities of Essex hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. In recent years, the existence of a Local Wildlife Site on a farm has been seen as an advantage when applying for grant-aid from agri-environment schemes, with such grants favouring areas with a proven nature conservation interest. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites in the county are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents
    Supported by Biodiversity Guide to the Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Contents Introduction 3 Barn Owl 5 Otter 7 Bats 9 Stag Beetle 12 Skylark 14 Native Black Poplar 16 Water Vole 18 Great Crested Newt 20 White Clawed Crayfish 22 Dormouse 24 Further Information 26 Where You Can Learn More About the Biodiversity in the Stour Valley 37 Map of Nature Reserves and Field Centres in the Stour Valley 42 Photographic Credits Skylark Dormouse Daubenton’s Bats Water Vole FLPA – Images of Nature Stag beetle and larvae David Archer / PTES Male Great Crested Newt Herpetological Conservation Trust White Clawed Crayfish The Brecks Project Children studying fresh water life Daws Hall Centre for Environmental Education 2 Introduction The Stour Valley on the Essex / Suffolk border is home to a wide range of wildlife some of which is protected in designated sites such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Local Wildlife Sites (formerly known as County Wildlife Sites or Sites of Interest for Nature Conservation). Wildlife is also in abundance in non- designated areas throughout the Stour Valley. Within the Stour Valley lies the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). It is one of 49 AONBs within England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Each AONB is a precious landscape whose distinctive character and natural beauty are so outstanding that they have been recognised as nationally important and given additional protection and funding. The Dedham Vale, as portrayed by John Constable 200 years ago, has come to represent many peoples idea of an idyllic lowland landscape. The Dedham Vale AONB and Stour Valley Project is a small team conserving and enhancing the special qualities of the Stour Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2017
    people’s trust for endangered species Annual review Bringing the wild back to life A voice for wildlife 01 Our mission and purpose 02 Our work 04 Message from the chair 05 Highlights in 2017 Our year abroad 15 Wildlife worldwide Our year in the UK 17 Sharing the learning 06 Mammals Our people 08 Hedgehogs 18 Standing up for wildlife 09 Dormice 18 Volunteers 10 Water voles 19 Partners 11 Invertebrates 19 Our trustees 12 Restoring landscapes 20 Financial supporters 12 Ancient woodland 13 Traditional orchards Finance & fundraising 14 Woodpasture and parklands 21 How we raised our money 14 Hedgerows 21 How we spent our money A voice for wildlife 01 Our mission To save our wildlife for the future. Our purpose Our wildlife is disappearing. Almost two thirds of species in the UK have declined in the past 50 years. Over 65,000 species are on the international alert list. There’s nothing natural or inevitable about this. It can be stopped. And we can all play a part. That’s why People’s Trust for Endangered Species exists. A voice for wildlife Scientific research © Little Fireface Project © Amanda Korstjens Amanda © Conservation action Education and awareness raising © PTES © Our work We live and breathe wildlife. Our passion drives our work. It’s what gives some of our most threatened species a chance to survive. 02 – 03 So how do we do this? Scientific research Conserving endangered species and the places where they live is a huge task. To have long-term impact we make our limited resources work as hard as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation to Climate Change Sustainable Local Economies Abundant Wildlife Healthy Cities and Green Space for All
    A living landscape A call to restore the UK’s battered ecosystems, for wildlife and people Adaptation to climate change Sustainable local economies Abundant wildlife Healthy cities and green space for all Updated with 100+ Living Landscape schemes So much of the UK now is packed with development Fenton/BBC Beatrice and wildlife is in retreat. There are many fine nature A LIVING LANDSCAPE reserves but our future must be to integrate human and natural communities and restore a better balance. This document lays out exciting and important new plans. Professor Aubrey Manning OBE President of The Wildlife Trusts Matthew Roberts. Cover picture: St Ives and the river Great Ouse, Cambridgshire, Dae Sasitorn/lastrefuge.co.uk Dae Cambridgshire, Ouse, Great river the and Ives St picture: Cover Roberts. Matthew Where will our water come from? When will our land use become truly sustainable? How can our environment adapt to climate change? What would it take to rebuild a wildlife-rich countryside? Why are so many people disconnected from nature? Priestcliffe Lees nature reserve, owned by Derbyshire Wildlife Trust: a treasure chest of local biodiversity. The Wildlife Trusts see such places as nodes from It’s time to think big which plants and animals can recolonise a recovering landscape To adapt to climate change, the UK’s wildlife will need to move Driven by local people and aspirations, The Wildlife Trusts play along ‘climate corridors’ up and down the country, or to shadier a leading role not just in developing the vision but in mustering slopes or cooler valleys. Wildlife has done it all before, after the the support that can allow communities to drive their own last ice age, but this time the change is faster and there are change.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre Metadata Statement
    Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre Metadata Statement 1. Overview Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre collates and manages species Biological Records Centre and habitat data for Essex both from within its reserves, and for the wider Abbotts Hall Farm landscape. We also work with partner organisations to collate and disseminate Great Wigborough other datasets for Essex. We do not hold all data for Essex, and therefore to obtain Colchester, Essex CO5 7RZ complete datasets for Essex it may be necessary to contact other organisations that Tel 01621 862999 also hold data for the area we cover. More details are below. E-mail [email protected] If you notice any inaccuracies or omissions in the data provided please contact us. Website www.essexwtrecords.org.uk 2. Temporal Coverage Please see the table below for details of individual taxonomic groups, and the metadata supplied with ArcGIS mapping files for information on the date that individual layers were last modified. The protected species dataset supplied by Essex Wildlife Trust will usually cover the last 15 years prior to supply as a minimum, older data is available on request. 3. Geographical Coverage The geographic area covered by Essex Wildlife Trust Biological Records Centre includes: • The modern administrative County of Essex; • Unitary authorities within the historic County of Essex (Southend-on-Sea Borough Council and Thurrock Council); • Vice-Counties 18 (South Essex) and 19 (North Essex); excluding any areas outside the modern county of Essex, which will be covered by the relevant LERC for that county. • Maritime extensions of Vice-Counties 18 and 19 to the 12 mile limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F – Shoreline Interactions & Response
    Appendix F Shoreline Interactions & Responses Final version 2.4 15 October 2010 Essex and South Suffolk SMP2 -Fi - Appendix F – Shoreline Interactions & Response Final version 2.4 15 October 2010 CONTENTS Page F1. INTRODUCTION 1 F2. DEVELOP BASELINE SCENARIOS 1 F2.1 Introduction 1 F2.1.1 Aim 1 F2.1.2 Geographical units 2 F2.1.3 Task methodology 2 F2.1.4 Sea level rise 6 F2.1.5 Assumptions and general notes 6 F2.1.6 Tables layout 7 F2.2 Frontage A - Stour and Orwell Estuaries 8 F2.3 Frontage B - Hamford Water 23 F2.4 Frontage C – Tendring Peninsula 34 F2.5 Frontage D - Colne Estuary 46 F2.6 Frontage E – Mersea Island 57 F2.7 Frontage F - Blackwater Estuary 64 F2.8 Frontage G - Dengie Flat 75 F2.9 Frontage H - Crouch and Roach Estuaries 86 F2.10 Frontage I - Foulness Island 96 F2.11 Frontage J - Southend-on-Sea and Shoebury 106 F3. ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL DEFENCES 117 F3.1 Introduction 117 F3.2 Residual Life 118 F3.2.1 SMP Guidance 118 F3.2.2 Essex and South Suffolk SMP Approach – ‘Estimated Unmaintained Life’ 118 F3.2.3 Approach for non-EA defences 121 F3.2.4 Assumptions and Considerations 122 F3.3 Validation by Asset Managers and Operations Delivery 124 F3.4 RESULTS 125 F3.4.1 Referencing of the defences 125 F3.4.2 Assessment 125 F3.4.3 Discussion 126 F4. COASTAL RISK MAPS 136 F4.1 Introduction 136 F4.2 Stour and Orwell 137 F4.2.1 General description 137 F4.2.2 Key estuarine processes and issues 137 F4.2.3 Zones of erosion and accretion 138 F4.2.4 Opportunities 139 F4.3 Hamford Water 140 F4.3.1 General description 140 F4.3.2 Key estuarine
    [Show full text]
  • Colchester Historic Characterisation Report 2009
    Front Cover: Arial view of Colchester Castle and Castle Park. ii Content FIGURES................................................................................................................................................VI ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................................................IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................................X COLCHESTER BOROUGH HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT CHARACTERISATION PROJECT ........... 11 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................... 12 2 THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT OF COLCHESTER BOROUGH............................................. 14 2.1 PALAEOLITHIC ........................................................................................................................ 14 2.2 MESOLITHIC ........................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 NEOLITHIC ............................................................................................................................. 15 BRONZE AGE....................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4 IRON AGE..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]