DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Authority Direct Delivery of Housing Third Round of Research 2021 Desk Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Authority Direct Delivery of Housing Third Round of Research 2021 Desk Survey Report Local authority direct delivery of housing Third Round of Research 2021 Desk Survey Report Janice Morphet and Ben Clifford Bartlett School of Planning, UCL May 2021 Janice Morphet and Ben Clifford would like to thank those who have donated funding and time to support this research: • Airey Miller https://www.aireymiller.com/ • HTA Design https://www.hta.co.uk/ • National Planning Forum https://www.natplanforum.org.uk/ • Planning Officers Society https://www.planningofficers.org.uk/ • Sheridan Development Management Ltd https://sheridandevelopment.co.uk/ • RedLoft https://www.redloft.co.uk/ • RTPI https://www.rtpi.org.uk/new-from-the-rtpi/ • Savills https://www.savills.co.uk/people/savills-margaret-street/steve-partridge.aspx • 3Fox International https://www.3fox.co.uk/ We would also like to thank the Advisory Board for their support and contribution to the research: • Jo Allchurch, LGA • Richard Blyth, RTPI • Sarah Davis, CIH • Mike De’Ath, HTA Design • Mike Hayes, Mike Hayes Associates • Mike Kiely, POS • Ken Lee, CIPFA • Gilian MacInnes, Gilian MacInnes Associates • Tony Mulhall, RICS • Andrew Piatt, Gateleys 1 Local authority direct delivery of housing Round 3 research Desk survey 2021 Report Executive Summary This report is the first part of the 2021 research on local authorities’ direct provision of housing. It has used the same methodology as in 2017 and 2019.1 In this desk survey research, we have found that the number of local authorities with companies which could support the provision of housing has increased from 78% to 83% in 2019 and 59% in 2017. 72% of councils have a JV in comparison with 57% in 2019 (no assessment was made in 2017). This survey shows that 80% of local authorities have indicated a need to provide affordable housing in their Corporate Strategies, an issue which the forthcoming final report will show has been exacerbated in the pandemic. The report demonstrates some of the differences in provision between London and the rest of England. Finally, the report illustrates, through its tables, the range of mechanism and means being used by local authorities to deliver housing to meet local needs in their areas including the HRA, companies, JVs, partnerships, regeneration and community land trusts. This research will be further discussed as part of the report on the rest of the 2021 research which includes a direct survey, round tables and case studies. 1 https://www.rtpi.org.uk/research/2017/june/local-authority-direct-provision-of-housing-i/ and https://www.rtpi.org.uk/research/2019/july/local-authority-direct- delivery-of-housing-ii-continuation-research/ 2 Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Methodology 4 Findings 5 Companies 5 Joint ventures 6 Affordable housing 7 Regeneration 8 Councils using modern methods of construction 9 Councils providing student housing or working with universities 9 Councils developing their own operational estate including civic centres 9 Councils working with other public sector landowners 10 Councils using passivhaus or similar environmental standards 10 Numbers of homes being delivered through council engagement 10 Differences in the public funding of delivery of social and affordable homes in London and the rest of England 11 Direct delivery of housing in London 12 Delivery in Mayoral Combined Authorities 13 Delivery in CAMCOX 16 Conclusions 17 Appendices 18 Local authorities that mentioned MMC and modular 18 Local authorities developing student housing 19 Local authorities developing civic buildings and car parks 20 Local authorities working with other public sector landowners 21 Local authorities using passivahaus or higher environmental standards 22 The Desk Survey 3 Introduction This desk survey is part of the third round of research that has been undertaken into the ways in which councils are directly engaging in the delivery of housing. Each round of research – in 2017, 2019 and 2021 – has been undertaken using the same methodology although in each round specific questions have been examined. In 2021, we have investigated a range of additional issues in the desk survey including the name of local authority companies, specific JV and partners and the numbers of homes being built where this information is online. The details of housing numbers have not been aggregated for each council as some are targets so should be seen more as a mosaic that is helping to compile a more complete picture although may gaps remain. We have also reviewed all council corporate plans and strategies for mentions of any priority for affordable housing and also reviewed where councils are working with community land trusts. The information that has been found for each council is listed on the table below. Before this there is some analysis of specific issues that emerged through this survey and, in the appendices, we have included lists of these councils engaged in specific types of initiatives discussed below. As this is a survey based on web sources alone, then inevitably, some information about council activity will not be in the table and some may have been overtaken by events. The web links can be accessed in the table to support what has been identified. Overall, the information has been very difficult to find and sometimes has required multiple searches. One conclusion of this desk survey is that councils are not identifying their levels and outcomes of housing delivery activity in one place. The information about the HRA, housing companies and RP partnerships is more difficult to find than the numbers of homes being provided though JVs on the whole. There is also a major gap between the discussion and information provided by councils on their delivery through housing and planning departments and that provided through regeneration, even where the council is contributing land and finance in addition to masterplanning and advocacy. Methodology The methodology used to undertake this desk survey has been the same as in 2017 and 2019. Each council was searched using the same terms on Google. In 2021, the desk research was undertaken between January and April and new search terms were added to those undertaken before which were primarily concerned with whether the council had a company or a joint venture. In 2021, each council was also searched for the following: • Whether the council’s corporate plan or strategy included their need to provide affordable housing – those councils that did mention the need for affordable housing have the link to this strategy included here. Those not mentioned either did not have any mention of affordable housing in their corporate strategy or plan or did not have one; • The Council HRA business plan or equivalent where the council has an HRA; 4 • Where the council has a company or a JV, the name of the company and/or the JV partners have been identified and included as far as possible; • The Council regeneration programmes that include housing – here the council may have a JV, some land ownership, or using advocacy to seek funding from government or its agencies for delivery; • The number of homes that the council appeared to be directly involved in delivering through their HRA, company, a JV, partnerships with RPs, their own RP or regeneration programmes. These are shown as separate figures and not aggregated in the table; there has been an effort to avoid double counting as far as possible; the source of these figures will be in the weblinks provided; they should be regarded as a mosaic; • The Council’s investment strategy; • The Council’s commercialisation strategy; and • Whether the council works with a community land trust The information found and included on the table is the result of the best efforts exercised in the process. It must be noted that the information is generally hard to find and piece together. Where there are opportunities to bring together the council’s approach to housing delivery, for example in the corporate plan, housing strategy or delivery plan, these omit much of the housing activity that councils are engaged upon. It is easy to find HRA new build budgets but not the associated capital programmes in many cases. Where councils have engaged in delivery with partners – JVs or RPs, councils do not appear to be ‘claiming’ this delivery although it is due to its direct investment in time, land, funding or advocacy. Findings In this section the findings are summarised under a range of issues. In the forthcoming final report for our research in 2021, these will be set within the wider findings of the changes in housing policy and practice since 2019 and the other parts of the research including the direct survey, the round tables and the case studies. Companies In comparison with 2017 and 2019, the number of councils with companies has increased from 58% in 2017, 78% in 2019 to 83% in 2021. Within these figures, there is an amount of churn with council companies, opening, closing and re-opening. With the exception of a few cases such as Merton, there is not always 5 much detail of why these companies have been closed. Where councils are not engaging in much delivery, there is no discussion as to why this is the case and these councils frequently rely on planning mechanisms for delivery of all types of housing including affordable of various types. Some councils have strong relationship with RPs, providing a development budget or specific partnership arrangements. This increase in the number of council companies may relate to the increasing use of JVs to deliver housing and this has increased from 57% in 2019 to 72% in 2021 (the figures were not collected in 2017). Some councils have multiple JV arrangements for housing delivery, and these appear to be focused on specific sites or locations. In the past, more JVs appear to have been established with a more general agreement to find development opportunities jointly, but the JV focus has narrowed in these cases to a specific number of identified sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Residential Update
    Residential update UK Residential Research | January 2018 South East London has benefitted from a significant facelift in recent years. A number of regeneration projects, including the redevelopment of ex-council estates, has not only transformed the local area, but has attracted in other developers. More affordable pricing compared with many other locations in London has also played its part. The prospects for South East London are bright, with plenty of residential developments raising the bar even further whilst also providing a more diverse choice for residents. Regeneration catalyst Pricing attraction Facelift boosts outlook South East London is a hive of residential Pricing has been critical in the residential The outlook for South East London is development activity. Almost 5,000 revolution in South East London. also bright. new private residential units are under Indeed pricing is so competitive relative While several of the major regeneration construction. There are also over 29,000 to many other parts of the capital, projects are completed or nearly private units in the planning pipeline or especially compared with north of the river, completed there are still others to come. unbuilt in existing developments, making it has meant that the residential product For example, Convoys Wharf has the it one of London’s most active residential developed has appealed to both residents potential to deliver around 3,500 homes development regions. within the area as well as people from and British Land plan to develop a similar Large regeneration projects are playing further afield. number at Canada Water. a key role in the delivery of much needed The competitively-priced Lewisham is But given the facelift that has already housing but are also vital in the uprating a prime example of where people have taken place and the enhanced perception and gentrification of many parts of moved within South East London to a more of South East London as a desirable and South East London.
    [Show full text]
  • City Villages: More Homes, Better Communities, IPPR
    CITY VILLAGES MORE HOMES, BETTER COMMUNITIES March 2015 © IPPR 2015 Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This book was first published in March 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions expressed in this collection are those of the authors only. CITY VILLAGES More homes, better communities Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies March 2015 ABOUT THE EDITORS Andrew Adonis is chair of trustees of IPPR and a former Labour cabinet minister. Bill Davies is a research fellow at IPPR North. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editors would like to thank Peabody for generously supporting the project, with particular thanks to Stephen Howlett, who is also a contributor. The editors would also like to thank the Oak Foundation for their generous and long-standing support for IPPR’s programme of housing work.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadia Commercial Brochure
    STADIA THREE WIMBLEDON LONDON SW17 RETAIL & LEISURE TO LET LEISURE RETAIL 1,574 SQ.M. (16,939 SQ. FT. GIA) 1,018 SQ.M. (10,953 SQ. FT. GIA) WIMBLEDON GROUNDS, PLOUGH LANE, WIMBLEDON, LONDON SW17 0BL LEISURE RETAIL STADIA THREE PLOUGH LANE A 51,000 SQ.M. MIXED USE REGENERATION MASTERPLAN WITH NEW AFC WIMBLEDON STADIUM AND OVER 600 APARTMENTS STADIA THREE DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW A major new landmark for Retail and split level Location, locality and South West London leisure space transport Stadia Three will be a regeneration showcase The entire ground level is to be occupied by retail and The development benefits from fast and direct road providing a new stadium for AFC Wimbledon leisure space, both with independent entrances, service and rail connections into central London while together with extensive residential, retail, areas and facilities. being situated deceptively close to the vast green recreational and cultural facilities. The The squash/leisure club could provide 5 courts, 2 expanses of Wimbledon Park, Wimbledon Common development will also accommodate a squash, gymnasiums and a dance studio together with and the largest of London’s royal parks - Richmond leisure or fitness club at ground and mezzanine comprehensive changing and locker facilities, ideally suited Park. The town centre lies little over one mile to level. for either an independent operator or brand chain. the south while Stadia Three will have four tube and rail lines within a 1300 metre radius. • Over 600 apartments above and • Retail unit providing 1018 sq.m. (10,953 sq.ft.) immediately adjacent prime retail GIA finished to shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the X12 Timetable
    Solihull to Birmingham X12 via Airport/NEC | Birmingham Business Park | Chelmsley Wood | Bromford Estate Monday to Friday from 30th August 2020 Solihull Rail Station 0310 0415 - 0517 - 0556 - 0624 0642 0702 0717 0732 0754 0814 0839 0859 Solihull Town Centre 0312 0417 - 0519 - 0558 - 0626 0644 0704 0719 0735 0757 0817 0842 0902 Damson Ln Land Rover Works 0322 0427 - 0529 - 0608 - 0638 0656 0716 0732 0749 0811 0833 0856 0916 International Station (NEC) 0332 0437 0512 0539 - 0619 - 0649 0707 0727 0743 0800 0822 0844 0907 0927 Birmingham Airport 0336 0441 0516 0543 - 0623 - 0653 0711 0731 0747 0804 0826 0848 0911 0931 Birmingham Business Park Waterside 0339 0444 0519 0546 - 0626 - 0656 0714 0734 0750 0807 0829 0851 0914 0934 Chelmsley Interchange (arr) 0348 0453 0528 0555 - 0635 - 0706 0724 0744 0801 0819 0841 0903 0925 0945 Chelmsley Interchange (dep) 0350 0455 0530 0557 0619 0637 0651 0708 0726 0746 0801 0821 0843 0905 0927 0947 Buckingham Rd Windward Way 0402 0507 0542 0609 0629 0648 0702 0720 0740 0801 0817 0837 0859 0918 0940 1000 Castle Bromwich Heathland Av. 0410 0515 0550 0618 0638 0657 0712 0730 0750 0811 0827 0847 0909 0928 0950 1010 Bromford Road - - 0558 0628 0648 0707 0722 0741 0801 0824 0839 0859 0920 0940 1000 1020 City Centre The Priory Q'way - - 0610 0640 0700 0720 0735 0755 0815 0840 0855 0915 0935 0955 1015 1035 Solihull Rail Station 0921 0941 03 23 43 1343 1359 1419 1438 1456 1516 1536 1559 1625 Solihull Town Centre 0924 0944 05 25 45 1345 1401 1421 1440 1459 1519 1539 1602 1628 Damson Ln Land Rover Works 0938 0958 18
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan/Feb 2007 (PDF)
    THE MAGAZINE OF THE MASTER BUILDERS’ ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2007 cov1 Contents PUBLISHER Tall Timber Group EDITOR Jeff Burd 412-366-1857 [email protected] Cover Story The Encore on PRODUCTION MANAGER Seventh Carson Publishing, Inc. Lincoln Properties, Quellé Diggs Mascaro Construction, HKS Architects ART DIRECTOR/GRAPHIC DESIGN Photo by Ed Massery Copyright 2006 Carson Publishing, Inc. Jaimee D. Greenawalt COVER PHOTO Ed Massery CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHY Carson Publishing, Inc. ADVERTISING SALES Features & Departments Tall Timber Group 412-366-1857 Dorothy Frank 3 PUBLISHER’S NOTE 30 MANAGEMENT 412-201-3222 PERSPECTIVE 4 NEWS FROM Some local leaders let us in on their More information: THE STREET resolutions for turning around 2007 BreakingGround is published by Tall More green building news, AIA Timber Group for the Master Builders’ Pittsburgh announces design awards, 33 MBE/WBE Association of Western Pennsylvania CBRE acquires Trammel Crow, COMPANY SPOTLIGHT Westinghouse nuclear is staying, the Window Treats No part of this magazine may be Pennsylvania legislature looks at a reproduced without written permission host of construction-related laws by the Publisher. All rights reserved. 34 TREND TO WATCH Home servers can help you make 7 REGIONAL sense of all the digital devices at This information is carefully gathered and MARKET UPDATE home compiled in such a manner as to ensure Local housing bubble pops, but maximum accuracy. We cannot, and do non-residential construction keeps 36 BEST PRACTICE not, guarantee either the correctness of chugging along all information furnished nor the complete Building information modeling absence of errors and omissions. Hence, responsibility for same neither can be, 9 NATIONAL 39 AWARDS AND nor is, assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies That Are Currently Providing Mecs
    Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies that are currently providing MECs Name Address Telephone 169 Mossley Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 Adams Pharmacy 6NE 0161 339 8889 Stalybridge Resource Centre, 2 Waterloo Road, Stalybridge. Adams Pharmacy SK15 2AU 0161 303 8599 Alipharma Ltd Thornley House Med Ctr) 11 Thornley Street, Hyde SK14 1JY 0161 351 1386 Asda Cavendish Street, Ashton Under Lyne, OL6 7DP 0161 342 6610 Asda Water Street, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 1BD 0161 882 5700 22 Stockport Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL7 Ashton Pharmacy 0LB 0161 330 4389 Ashton Primary Care Centre Pharmacy 193 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 7SR 0161 820 8281 Audenshaw Pharmacy 3 Chapel Street, Audenshaw, Manchester, M34 5DE 0161 320 9123 Boots 116-118 Station Road, Hadfield, Glossop SK13 1AJ 01457 853635 Hattersley Health Centre, Hattersley Road East, Hattersley, Boots Hyde SK14 3EH 0161 368 8498 Boots 72 Market Street, Droylsden, Manchester M43 6DE 0161 370 1626 Boots 30 Concorde Way, Dukinfield, Cheshire SK16 4DB 0161 330 3586 Boots 173 Mossley Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6NE 0161 330 1303 Boots 1-3 Bow Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6BU 0161 330 1746 Boots UK Ltd 15-17 Staveleigh Way, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 7JL 0161 308 2326 Boots UK Ltd 19 High Street West, Glossop, Derbyshire SK13 8AL 01457 852011 Boots UK Ltd 1A Market Place, Hyde, Cheshire SK14 2LX 0161 368 2249 Boots UK Ltd 33 Queens Walk, Droylsden, Manchester M43 7AD 0161 370 1402 Crown Point North, Retail Park, Ashton Road, Denton M34
    [Show full text]
  • Wimbledon Stadium, Plough Lane, Tooting, SW17 0BL
    Agenda Item 11 PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 21 March 2019 APPLICATION NO. DATE VALID 18/P3354 13/08/2018 Address/Site Wimbledon Stadium, Plough Lane, Tooting, SW17 0BL Ward Wimbledon Park Proposal: Application under Section 73 to vary conditions 3 (approved plans) and 20 (opening hours) and omit conditions 22, 23, 44 and 46 (all relating to café and crèche) attached to LBM planning permission 14/P4361 (football stadium, commercial and residential development). Minor material amendments Commercial - removal of crèche & café, 20 new retail car parking spaces Stadium - internal & external alterations, removal of semi-basement, reduction in car parking, altered cycle parking, condition 20 (opening hours of stadium/shop) reworded to include provision for extra hour opening (until 23.00) as required by the football authorities (matches requiring extra time & penalties) Residential - additional floor on building A.J & infill block between building A.J & A.N (creating 18 new units). increased refuse & cycle facilities, re- positioning building B, alterations to elevations, internal layout & housing mix brings number of units from 604 to 632. Shared ownership increase (60 to 181 - 29%) Drawing Nos SITE_999_000_1001_P3, 098_P3, 099_P3, 100_P3, 101_P3, 102_P3, 103_P3, 104_P3, 105_P3, 106_P3, 107_P3, 108_P3, 109_P3 and 110_P3. SITE_999_000_1011_P3, 1012_P3, 1013_P3, 1014_P3, 1015_P3, 1016_P3, 1017_P3, 1018_P3, Page 145 1019_P3, 1020_P3, 1021_P3, 1022_P3 and 1023_P3. 542-01-010 Rev J, 011 Rev G, 012 Rev E, 013 Rev E, 051 Rev D, 052 Rev C, 053 Rev C, 054 Rev C, 055 Rev C, 056 Rev C, 110 Rev F, 111 Rev F, 151 Rev E, 152 Rev D, 153 Rev D, 154 Rev D and 155 Rev D.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Credit and Brexit
    Housing, Credit and Brexit Ben Ansell∗ Abstract Dozens of articles have been drafted attempting to explain the narrow vic- tory for the Leave campaign in Britain’s EU referendum in June 2016. Yet, hitherto, and despite a general interest in ‘Left Behind’ commentary, few writ- ers have drawn attention to the connection between the Brexit vote and the distribution of British housing costs. This memo examines the connection be- tween house prices and both aggregate voting during the EU referendum and individual vote intention beforehand. I find a very strong connection at the local authority, ward, and individual level between house prices and support for the Remain campaign, one that even holds up within regions and local authorities. Preliminary analysis suggests that housing values reflect long-run social differences that are just as manifest in attitudes to immigration as Brexit. Local ‘ecologies of unease’ (Reeves and Gimpel, 2012) appear a crucial force behind Brexit. This is a short memo on housing, credit and Brexit to be presented at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 2017. ∗Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions, Nuffield College, University of Oxford. [email protected]. My acknowledgements and thanks go to Jane Gingrich for the provision of local economic and housing data. 1 1 Introduction If there is one saving grace of Brexit for the British higher education system it is a boom of Brexit studies that began pouring forth as the dust settled on June 24th 2016. Most scholars have coalesced around an understanding of Brexit that to some extent mirrors that implicit in Theresa May’s quasi hard Brexit strategy - Brexit was caused by both economic and cultural forces, with opposition to the European Union based on concerns about immigration and of declining cultural and social status rather than economic deprivation or actual migration levels per se (Kaufmann, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Procurement Hub List of Members December 2020
    Procurement Hub List of Members December 2020 Account Name Date Joined Industry Billing City Billing Zip/Postal Code NHS Property Services 07/04/2017 Healthcare London EC2V 7NQ Stroke Association 30/07/2018 Charity London EC1V 2PR Royal Marsden NHS Trust 17/05/2017 Healthcare London SW3 6JJ Paragon Asra Housing Ltd 05/01/2018 Housing Walton-on-Thames KT12 1DZ East Sussex College Group 04/12/2019 Education BN21 2UF Homes England 21/10/2019 Government Department London SW1H 0TL Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust 09/01/2019 Healthcare Epsom KT17 1HB Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation 28/06/2016 Housing London W10 5BE Notting Hill Genesis 12/01/2017 Housing London NW1 0DL Medway NHS Foundation Trust 30/11/2018 Healthcare Gillingham ME7 5NY Croydon Health Services NHS Trust 17/10/2018 Healthcare Thornton Heath CR7 7YE London and Continental Railways 26/07/2016 Local Authority London WC2B 4AN Tower Hamlet Homes 23/11/2016 Housing London E1 4FG Chelmsford City Council 18/07/2017 Local Authority Chelmsford CM1 1JE Lewisham Homes 14/09/2017 Housing London SE6 4RU Paradigm Housing Group 30/01/2017 Housing Wooburn Green HP10 0DF King's College London 09/01/2019 Education London WC2R 2LS Saffron Housing Trust 14/11/2017 Housing Long Stratton NR15 2XP The Hyde Group 09/11/2017 Housing London SE1 9EQ Family Mosaic 16/02/2017 Housing London SE1 2RJ Goldsmiths, University of London 02/05/2017 Education London SE14 6NW Brentwood Borough Council 13/12/2018 Local Authority Brentwood CM15 8AY Anglia Ruskin University 31/08/2018
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Welwyn Hatfield Council Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report May 2016 Welwyn Hatfield Council Council Offices The Campus Welwyn Garden City Hertfordshire AL8 8AE This page is intentionally left blank 2015s2849_WHBC_SFRA_FINAL_Report_v4.0 i JBA Project Manager Joanne Chillingworth The Library St Philip’s Courtyard Church End COLESHILL B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Amendments Issued to Date Issued Draft v1.0 / Submitted Level 1 SFRA only. Some sections were still Andrew Turner 10th July 2015 incomplete whilst awaiting data. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Draft v2.0 / Submitted Level 1 and Level 2 draft report, pending Andrew Turner 3rd September 2015 additional sites summary tables. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v1.0 Submitted Level 1 and Level 2 reports with alterations Andrew Turner 5th November 2015 based on WHC, HCC & EA comments. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v2.0 Submitted Level 1 and Level 2 reports with alterations Andrew Turner 18th November 2015 based on WHC comments. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v3.0 Submitted Level 1 and Level report with minor amendments Andrew Turner 3nd December 2015 and alterations regarding phasing. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v4.0 Amendments relating to the new climate change guidance, Andrew Turner 10th May 2016 published February 2016 (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Contract This report describes work commissioned by Welwyn Hatfield Council. The Council’s representative for the contract was Andrew Turner. Prepared by .................................................. Andrew Waite BSc MRes Analyst ....................................................................... Joanne Chillingworth BSc MSc C.WEM MCIWEM Chartered Senior Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc C.WEM MCIWEM Chartered Senior Analyst Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Report for Welwyn Hatfield Council.
    [Show full text]