The Teemburra Dam now being constructed will provide additional water to boost cane irrigation within the Pioneer Valley area. Not only will the Dam ensure a more regular supply of irrigation water, but it will also help to mitigate against the effects of prolonged drought such as that recently experienced in the Mackay region. The Teemburra Dam will also help produce a range of economic benefits for both the region and the state through increased production of cane and sugar exports.

However the waters from Teemburra will do more than assist sugar growers. There are plans to utilise Teemburra waters at a number of proposed industrial facilities including a bagasse pulp processing plant for paper production and at a yeast factory. It is expected that waste waters from these facilities will then be available for re-use for cane irrigation.

In its examination of this project, the Committee was able to look at alternative proposals, the planning process, the various levels of approvals required and finally, at the financial and construction elements. In doing this, the Committee conducted hearings at which members of the public were able to express their opinions and preferences and set out what they saw to be the more important aspects of the proposal.

The Committee is making a number of recommendations in regard to this project. Principle among these are two which are aimed at improving the approval processes involved and the clarification of the time of commencement of works.

Other recommendations relate to the level of community facilities to be developed at the dam site, the increased use of demand management by the Department of Primary Industries, and the equitable consideration of historical water users affected by the development.

Finally, the Committee draws attention to the high level of professionalism and commitment demonstrated by officers of the Department of Primary Industries in their approach to implementing the project. The Committee in previous reports has also outlined the importance of being provided with comprehensive and relevant information by government and non-government organisations and members of the public. In this respect the Committee expresses its particular appreciation to Departmental officers for the co-operation given to it and for the comprehensive briefings and answers given to matters raised during the course of the inquiry. Such co-operation and openness is an essential part in ensuring that the Committee is able to properly discharge its responsibilities to the Parliament and the people of Queensland.

Ms Judy Spence MLA Chairman

2 Introduction Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

INTRODUCTION

THE COMMITTEE

1 This Standing Committee, established by the Public Works Committee Act 1989, consists of seven Members of the Legislative Assembly. Four Members are nominated by the Leader of the House and three by the Leader of the Opposition. The resultant all-party Committee adopts a non-partisan approach in the conduct of its inquiries.

2 The Committee reviews public works valued at over $2.4 million. This can be done at any stage, from planning through to completion, and can include such matters as design, land purchase, calling of tenders, new construction, reconstruction and extensions.

3 In conducting its inquiries, the Committee may have regard to such issues as the suitability and necessity of works, the value for money achieved, the impact on the economy, community and environment and the general performance of the constructing authority. While the Committee does not examine all works, it aims to ensure a level of scrutiny across all departments involved in the State's capital works program.

INSTITUTION OF INQUIRY

4 The Committee takes a variety of matters into consideration in the conduct of its inquiries, many of which also form the basis of its decisions to inquire into particular areas or projects. The Committee reviews projects from as wide a selection of departments and other constructing authorities as is practicable, in a variety of locations throughout Queensland and at various stages of their implementation.

5 Pursuant to Section 18 of the Public Works Committee Act 1989, the Committee resolved to inquire into and report on the Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas. The project mainly involves the construction of a 137,600 megalitre Dam on Teemburra Creek, some 70 kilometres west of Mackay.

6 The Committee initiated this inquiry:

(a) to assess the need for and suitability of the project; (b) to examine the appropriateness and efficiency of the procurement system adopted; (c) to examine the adequacy of the design of the project; (d) to assess the level and sufficiency of consultation which occurred, and (e) to provide a forum in which further community opinion could be voiced in regard to the project.

7 The Committee considers that in the development of public works, construction authorities should seek input from end users as well as from people and organisations either affected by or with an interest in the development. The Committee sees one of

3 Introduction Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

its roles as facilitating this process by providing a public forum in which community opinion, whether it be suggestions, praise or criticism, can be heard. The Committee is convinced, however, that the focus of this and all other State Government capital works projects must be upon maximising the benefits to as wide a community as is possible and appropriate.

8 The Committee also wishes to ensure that Queensland receives value in the development of capital assets, and that such assets are then managed to provide the best possible outcomes.

SUBMISSIONS, INSPECTION AND HEARINGS

9 The Committee sought public submissions in relation to the development of the Teemburra Dam by public advertisement and by direct mail to selected interest groups and individuals. A copy of the advertisement is appended to this Report (Appendix A) as is a list of the submissions received (Appendix B).

10 On 5 December members of the Committee inspected the site of the proposed dam and viewed the works under construction. Following this, the Committee held a public hearing in the Auditorium of the Mackay Electricity Board. A list of those who provided evidence at the hearing is appended to this Report (Appendix C).

11 The Committee expresses its appreciation to those who assisted it in its inquiry through providing information and making submissions and by appearing before it.

RESPONSIBILITY OF MINISTERS

12 This Report contains recommendations for action to be taken by the Government. Pursuant to Section 46 of the Public Works Committee Act 1989, a response is required in Parliament by the responsible Minister. The requirement is:

Public Works Committee Act 1989

S. 46 Where Minister to report. Where a report of the Committee recommends that a particular action be taken by the Government with respect to a matter, the appropriate responsible Minister of the Crown shall within the period of not more than three months after the report has been tabled or is deemed to have been tabled in the Legislative Assembly, or if at the expiration of that period the Legislative Assembly is not sitting, at the earliest opportunity after that period table a report in writing in the Legislative Assembly as to the action (if any) taken or proposed to be taken by the Government with respect to the recommendation of the Committee.

4 Need and Suitability Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

NEED AND SUITABILITY

OVERVIEW

13 The dam site is on Teemburra Creek, a tributary of Blacks Creek which is in turn a tributary of the Pioneer River. The dam will have a storage capacity of 137,600 megalitres and an expected available supply of 41,150 megalitres per year. Water will be provided for urban, industrial and irrigation needs within the Pioneer Valley, it being estimated that 12,000 megalitres will be allocated to urban and industrial use with the remaining 29,150 megalitres available for irrigation. The aim of the project is to provide a more regular supply of water for all users, particularly for those sugar cane producers who currently rely primarily upon rainfall. In total some 9,000 hectares of allocated cane land will receive Teemburra water, but no new cane lands will be developed as a result of this project.

14 A number of submissions made to the Committee argue that the development of a number of new industrial projects within the Pioneer Valley is contingent upon the availability of large volumes of water. The Committee accepts that without the construction of this project these industrial developments are extremely unlikely to proceed. However, the main users of the proposed scheme, both in terms of numbers and volume are cane producers. The primary benefit of the scheme for these users is the provision of irrigation to supplement rainfall (therefore removing uncertainty from yields and production levels) and to insure against the risk of drought. An additional expected benefit, based on experience elsewhere, is the increase in the average productivity of existing cane lands.

15 The Committee was informed that surveys of potential farm users indicate that a substantial level of demand for water, which will not be able to be met by the current proposal exists under the envisaged pricing structure. The Committee concurs with the statement contained in a discussion paper prepared by the Department of Primary Industries entitled State Water Conservation Strategy that "the provision of additional water storage in the Mackay area is essential and of high priority. Failure to address the shortfall in supplies will result in a continuation of major losses due to drought, a continuing decline in the value of production from the area and a lack of stability of production".

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO MEET THE NEED

16 In its submission to the Committee, the Department of Primary Industries stated that a number of alternative solutions to meet the need for additional water supply had been examined. A number of options were considered including the increased use of ground water reserves, waste water re-use, the development of rainwater tanks and desalination. In evidence, the Committee was informed that the first three alternatives considered were unable to produce supplies of comparable quantity to those of the proposed dam and that the last alternative was substantially more expensive. Another option considered was based on water harvesting from river flows into a number of storages. The Committee questioned departmental witnesses at its public hearing in regard to the extent of their examination of these alternative solutions together with

5 Need and Suitability Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

the extent of departmental emphasis placed upon demand management techniques aimed at better utilising the existing water resource.

17 The Committee was informed that the extent of examination of these alternative solutions was relatively limited due to their social and economic impact. For example, it was estimated that desalination could cost up to ten times the cost per megalitre of on-stream storage. Additionally the Committee was informed that groundwater is currently the largest source of supply of irrigation water in the Pioneer Valley with up to 50,000 megalitres per annum being used for irrigation. It is estimated that some 18,000 hectares of assigned cane lands receive irrigation in this form. This supply source is fully committed and is currently stressed as a result of the recent drought, resulting in a number of areas suffering saltwater intrusion. To ease the situation, the use of waste water from sewage treatment has been considered but the major potential source, the Mount Basset treatment plant, is poorly located for such water re-use. Preliminary consideration has also been given to the siting, south of Mackay, of a new plant which may make treated effluent available for irrigation purposes.

18 An analysis of the possible development of additional off-stream harvesting of flood waters in multiple storages was shown to realise similar volumes of water and levels of reliability. However, the capital costs of the work were found to be considerably higher than for a major on stream storage. This option would also have required the resumption of up to 50 existing farms with the consequent social impact and decrease in available productive land.

19 In relation to demand management the summary report of the feasibility studies into the project states that "there is no prospect of reducing water use through demand management and thus obviating the need for additional storage". The Committee accepts that the amount of demand reduction which could be achieved within the Pioneer Valley may not be sufficient to alleviate the need to construct a new major storage. However, it would appear to the Committee that there may be potential for further improvements to be made and that investigation of more effective and extensive demand management approaches should proceed as quickly as possible. Such an objective is in line with the goals of the Department of Primary Industries Water Services Program which includes improving the effectiveness of water services and water use in all sectors of industry and the community.

20 The Committee accepts the view that the Queensland sugar industry is efficient in terms of world standards, however it considers that improvements can be gained through the more efficient use of water. For example, irrigation based on the use of devices such as soil moisture probes to determine the optimal time for water application (in contrast to application on an arbitrary basis) could well produce worthwhile improvements in terms of water usage. The Committee is aware of a number of projects currently being undertaken in the Mackay district to examine overall demand management, including industry funded work undertaken by the Bureau of Sugar Experimental Stations.

6 Need and Suitability Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

PLANNING STUDIES

21 The development of an additional major storage facility in the Pioneer Valley has involved a number of extensive planning studies. In 1990 the Department of Primary Industries undertook an initial appraisal study to determine the major potential storage sites in the Valley which were sufficient to meet the area's water supply requirements. The study considered potential sites on Blacks Creek, Cattle Creek, Finch Hatton Creek, and Teemburra Creek and concluded that a dam 20.5 kilometres upstream from the junction of Teemburra and Blacks Creek on Teemburra Creek warranted further investigation. It was recognised at this stage that this option would not be sufficient to meet all of the existing demand and that in future, as demand continued to increase, a further dam would need to be considered, possibly on Blacks Creek. At its public hearing the Committee was informed by Department of Primary Industries representatives that no decision had yet been made in relation to the development or programming of future projects.

22 The Committee was informed that while this initial appraisal study was contained in a publicly available document, its existence was not advertised by the Department of Primary Industries. The Committee considers that it may have been beneficial if this document had been made more widely available at the time, thereby ensuring a better flow of information between all interested groups and individuals involved and the Department of Primary Industries.

23 Following this, throughout 1992 and early 1993 the Department of Primary Industries undertook a more detailed Feasibility Study of the project. This involved a number of individual studies into specific issues including the extent of water needs, soil suitability, hydrological resources, design and cost estimates, reticulation systems, operating costs, environmental and social impact assessments, and client surveys. These studies were then summarised into a single document, the Summary Report of the Feasibility Studies, which was made available for public comment in April 1993.

24 The Committee was told that a survey of farms undertaken in the context of this feasibility study exercise indicated a minimum demand level of 63,000 megalitres per year at the nominated price, compared with a proposed available supply of 41,150 megalitres. Additional to this demand urban requirements of 2,000 megalitres for the Mirani and Sarina Shires and an industrial usage approaching 12,000 megalitres were also identified.

25 Hydrological studies indicated that the irrigation supply of 41,500 megalitres would be available in 95% of years with the controlling consideration of the study being that the urban supply at Dumbleton Weir was not to fail. In evidence, the Committee was informed that the data available for the flow rates for Teemburra Creek was limited and consequently comparisons were made with other similar local creeks. This would appear to substantiate the comments contained in the evaluation of the Water Production Program conducted by Treasury in 1993 which found that there was a need to improve the extent of hydrological data available. Some concerns were also raised at the public hearing as to the volume of flow of the creek and the length time which may be required to fill the dam.

7 Need and Suitability Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

26 The Committee also heard evidence that the release levels from the dam may be able to be higher than currently planned by the Department of Primary Industries and that this would be of benefit in meeting the indicated demand levels. The Summary Report of the Feasibility Studies stated that "more water could be made available if the level of reliability to users was reduced, but the system would require operating rules to ensure supply to Mackay's urban users was maintained". The Committee considers that this option should be further considered and the level of risk determined if more water were made available in the majority of years.

27 In the course of its public hearing, the Committee became aware that some public concern existed in relation to the extent of consideration given to providing a larger dam which was better able to meet the identified demand for water within the valley. While representatives from Mirani Shire were very supportive of the construction of the new dam, some concerns were raised that a larger facility may have more adequately met the need for water supply for irrigation purposes and they therefore strongly advocated the need for more storage facilities to be developed in the near future.

DETERMINATION OF IRRIGATION AREAS

28 The Committee accepts that there are many competing demands for additional water resources within the Pioneer Valley and that it is unavoidable, in relation to identified levels of agricultural demand, that a number of potential users will not receive additional water. Due to the shortfall in the proposed supply for irrigation purposes a major task in the overall planning processes is the determination of which areas will receive water allocations. To facilitate this decision, a steering committee consisting of representatives from the Department of Primary Industries, Canegrowers (Mackay), Mackay Sugar, local government and the Mackay Conservation Group has been formed to assist in the selection process. A series of public meetings in each of the potential irrigation areas has also taken place. The Committee was told that the selection process was to have been finalised by late February 1995.

29 The Committee was also informed that a general review of the soils of some 290,000 hectares of land had been undertaken in the mid 1980s to determine their suitability for irrigation. The Committee understands that the areas finally chosen will be based on this the relative costs of reticulation between various areas and the possible environmental impact of each alternative reticulation method. The ongoing development of reticulation works, including the completion of the detailed design, construction, operation and maintenance of the works will be the responsibility of a Water Board expected to be appointed by mid 1995. These reticulation works are expected to commence in early 1996 and be fully completed by early 1999.

30 The Committee accepts that there will be a large number of beneficiaries of this development, including industrial and urban users and some 250 to 300 farms with a total area of some 9,000 hectares. However, the Committee also wished to determine the extent to which any individual or organisation might be adversely affected by the proposal. In its examination of Departmental witnesses the Committee found that some 40 farmers with allocated cane lands were currently unregulated in their water use and would, upon completion of the project, become regulated users. These individual farms had an historical use of water and were able to pump as much water

8 Need and Suitability Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

as they needed, and was available, upon a certain area of land assigned for cane production. The Committee accepts that these users will see the construction of a dam as being to their detriment in that their supply will be restricted and they will now have to pay for it.

31 However, the Committee was informed that these users would receive the benefit of a more regular supply of water, as currently in some years there is little natural stream flow and the pumping of water is not possible. It is currently proposed to convert existing irrigation open licences on the basis of three megalitres usage per hectare, this being based upon long-term average use. However, there are six large cane assignments in this group which may have used in the region of five to seven megalitres per hectare. The Committee is therefore pleased to note that the Steering Committee has recommended that unused allocations be redistributed with preference given to increasing the allocation to those existing licence holders who can demonstrate a history of use in excess of three megalitres per hectare.

PRIVATE SECTOR INVOLVEMENT

32 The Committee notes that a considerable demand for water exists within the Pioneer Valley to supply future private industrial projects. In its submission to the Committee the Department of Business, Industry and Regional Development stated that the "sugar industry in the Mackay region is becoming increasingly integrated both horizontally and vertically which will make it the most diversified sugar based agro-industrial complex in Queensland ... it is not unreasonable to expect that further projects based on value-adding to sugar products will establish in the Mackay area if adequate water supplies are available". The submission describes two major potential projects within the region which require large volumes of water. The first involves the processing of bagasse (a by-product of sugar production) for paper pulp and would require up to 11,300 megalitres of water per annum. The second project, the development of a yeast plant for the production of baker's yeast for export, would require 500 megalitres of water per annum.

33 The Committee was also informed that it was expected that waste water from these plants could be suitable for crop irrigation. In excess of 8,000 megalitres of effluent may be available from the bagasse plant and 475 megalitres from the yeast plant with the majority of these waters possibly being available to irrigators in the existing Eton irrigation area as a result of the siting of the proposed facilities. However, options for the possible re-use of waste water produced by these industrial developments are currently being examined and environmental studies being undertaken. It is possible that such waste water will be returned to the waterways and resold by the Water Board. However, the water quality was unknown, and the area likely to be served was more an augmentation of the Eton area, the feasibility study of the Teemburra project made no allowance for it. It is envisaged that water supplies not taken up until the industrial projects proceed will be available for cane irrigation by way of spot sales.

34 Industrial users are currently required to pay the full economic cost of supply for water including an amount for headworks and if developed it is expected that the bagasse plant will raise the level of direct user's contribution to the capital costs of the project from 25 percent to 35 percent.

9 Need and Suitability Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

CANEGROWERS' INVOLVEMENT

35 Canegrowers Mackay has been involved in the process of development of additional storages in the region and has made representations to governments over a number of years in relation to the need for the provision of additional irrigation within the Pioneer Valley. At the same time, in April 1991, the Government had announced a policy decision which required users to make some contribution to capital works. Because of this, and in order to assist the planning in regard to the Teemburra project, Canegrowers Mackay in conjunction with the Department of Primary Industries undertook two canvasses of growers (in November 1992 and February 1993) to determine the level of demand and affordability of water for users in the Pioneer Valley. The first canvass consisted of two large meetings of growers at which the project details were explained and growers were requested to indicate their requirements for water and the level of contribution they were prepared to offer towards the capital cost of construction. A high proportion of those who applied for water in this initial canvass were unwilling to make any capital contribution. Consequently, an additional assessment of growers' ability to pay was undertaken together with assessments of expected increases in yield following the addition of irrigation. The second canvass which was undertaken indicated a demand for water, at the proposed water charges, in excess of 63,000 megalitres.

36 In early 1993 the Department of Primary Industries, together with Canegrowers Mackay, put a proposal to Queensland Treasury for construction of the project. This proposal was unsuccessful as there were no capital contributions from industry. Subsequently, funding under the Sugar Industry Infrastructure Package program became available together with a significant industry contribution. This enabled the project to proceed.

10 Approval Process Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

APPROVAL PROCESS

37 The Committee is aware that the development of a facility of the nature of a major dam is a complex task requiring a significant effort to ensure the co-ordination and co-operation of a wide range and number of groups and individuals likely to be affected.

38 This project is partly funded under the sugar industry infrastructure package, which is co-sponsored by the Federal Department of Primary Industries and Energy and the Queensland Department of Primary Industries. Commonwealth requirements are that approval to proceed be given by the Federal Minister for Primary Industries and Energy contingent upon receipt of an environmental clearance provided by the Commonwealth Environment Protection Agency. It, in turn, requires that an Impact Assessment Statement be developed for the project together with an Environmental Management Plan.

39 The Committee received evidence from representatives of the Department of Primary Industries that the approval process had been a source of some delay for the project and that this had some impacts upon the scheduling of works and the development of tenders. However, it should be recognised that in some instances delays will occur and that these delays must be allowed for in the programming of such projects.

40 An environmental clearance to proceed was issued by the Commonwealth Environment Protection Agency in late December 1994 and the Department of Primary Industries and Energy gave approval in early February 1995.

11 Project Management Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

41 The Water Resources Division of the Department of Primary Industries has been appointed project manager for the overall project. The development of the dam will be undertaken by a project management team involved in operational management, project investigations, detailed design and construction supervision. The design and construction supervision of the main dam is being undertaken by the Engineering Services Group of the Water Resources Division of the Department of Primary Industries.

42 The project consists of specific components and is programmed to allow preliminary works including upgrading of access roads and relocation of power lines to proceed while the actual design of the dam is completed and contract arrangements undertaken. The work is programmed to be undertaken over a three year period and it is currently expected that the dam itself will be completed by the end of 1996 in time for the wet season. The Committee was informed that any delay in achieving closure of the dam may mean the loss of a season of water supply and this would reduce the economic performance of the scheme.

43 In relation to the total expenditure on the main dam and its associated works, the Committee was advised that the expenditure would be divided in the following proportions: % Government 15.0 Consultants 0.5 Local Authorities/Public Utilities 6.0 Hire of Privately Owned Plant 4.6 Suppliers/Contractors 73.9 Total 100.0

44 The Committee was advised that only one of the tender packages included pre-registration, the rest being let through open tender. Tender evaluation is typically undertaken by the contract administration group in conjunction with the on-site project manager. Copies of the full tender documents were made available for examination by the Committee.

45 In relation to the reticulation works, it is expected that these will be developed through a yet to be established water board. This board will also be responsible for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the reticulation works.

12 Dam Design Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

DAM DESIGN

THE MAIN DAM

46 The Teemburra project involves three separate dams, these being the main dam and two smaller secondary dams located on low saddles on the eastern rim of the reservoir (see Appendix D, Location Plan). The main dam will be approximately 55 metres in height and over 300 metres in length. The saddle dams will be 15 and 25 metres high respectively.

47 Detailed design feasibility studies for the project were undertaken for three alternative dam wall heights and preliminary designs and cost estimates were undertaken for each. As a result of these studies, it was decided that the optimum size for the dam was 137,600 megalitres, but 92,100, and 194,500 megalitre capacity dams were also considered. While the largest option dam provided an additional storage capacity of 56,900 megalitres its additional average yield capacity was only 2,610 megalitres. It was also estimated to cost $72.9 million or $13.6 million more than the 137,600 megalitre dam. The smaller 92,100 megalitre capacity dam was estimated to yield 36,200 megalitres per year, 4,950 megalitres less than the 137,600 megalitre dam. However, the smallest capacity dam was estimated to cost $48.3 million or $11 million less than the chosen option. It was therefore decided that "the largest development that could be justified on Teemburra Creek is a dam with a capacity of approximately 137,600 megalitres incorporating a diversion to Cattle Creek".

ESTIMATED COSTS AND YIELDS Dam capacity Average Annual Yield Cost Cost per megalitre yield (Megalitre) (Megalitre) $m $’000 92,100 36,200 48.3 1.334 137,600 41,150 59.3 1.441 194,500 43,760 72.9 1.666

The reticulation component for the selection options estimated to cost $14.7 million and is included in the above figure.

48 The Committee was informed that a number of different types of construction were suitable for the main dam, including an earth rockfill embankment, concrete faced rockfill, conventional concrete gravity and roller compacted concrete designs. Due to the limited availability of clay and sand materials the earth and rockfill embankment option was eliminated. Preliminary investigations also indicated, on the basis of cost, that roller compacted concreted construction offered advantages over the other dam types. However, after additional detailed engineering investigations, it became apparent that the concrete faced rockfill dam actually had substantial advantages over the roller compacted concrete design.

49 In a bid to obtain the lowest possible costs, a study was then commissioned to evaluate the possible development of further design, this being a rockfill embankment with a central impervious core of either asphaltic concrete or normal concrete. An

13 Dam Design Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

advantage of this type of dam is that water storage can be commenced prior to the construction being completed.

50 Another consideration was that if construction could be reduced to under one year, then the need for the expensive reinforcement for a concrete face rockfill dam which is required could have been eliminated. However, the Committee was advised that it was found that the construction of such a dam of the size envisaged would need to occur over a two year period and consequently, due to the intervening wet season, it would be necessary to protect the dam against overtopping (that is, the trapped waters flowing over and damaging the incomplete dam wall). This is undertaken by placing steel mesh protection on the downstream face, a costly operation which involves anchoring the mesh into the rockfill.

51 These findings resulted in the Hydro Electric Commission Enterprise Corporation of Tasmania being engaged, in November 1993, to assess these alternative designs and their cost implications. The Corporation concluded that the concrete faced rockfill dam was the cheapest option and that construction could not be accelerated to enable water storage one year earlier. The estimated cost of construction of a concrete faced rockfill dam was $23.5 million, while the costs of asphalt and concrete core rockfill dams were $25.4 million and $27.8 million respectively.

52 In relation to the final design of the dam the Committee was informed that other cost savings had been achieved by the provision of an innovative design incorporating an inclined intake supported on the dam embankment, allowing for the selective withdrawal of water from any level of the storage. These outlet works at the main dam wall will allow releases to meet demand in the Upper Pioneer Valley and the Mirani Weir.

THE SADDLE DAMS

53 The project also involves the construction of two additional smaller dams located on low saddles. These will be homogeneous earthfill embankments with a system of internal drainage, with materials for the embankment obtained from “borrow” areas located within the area to be inundated by the reservoir. The first of these dams is located one kilometre east of the main dam, will be approximately 15 metres high and will also form part of the main access road.

54 The second saddle dam is located approximately four kilometres north east of the main dam and will have an embankment height of 25 metres. This position is close to the eastern escarpment and will incorporate the main diversion outlet from the dam. As some concern existed in regard to the initial placement of this saddle dam close to the edge of the escarpment, its alignment was altered to maximise the distance from the escarpment and minimise the possible extent of seepage.

55 The design of the outlet works will be similar to that of the main dam to allow for the recovery of the required level and quality of water. It is expected that water will be available from this outlet down to 15% of the Dam’s total capacity. A conduit will be constructed under the embankment and linked to an isolation valve pit from which water will be conveyed via a steel pipeline to Palmtree Creek. This pipeline is routed down the steep escarpment and is suitable for the later addition of a small

14 Dam Design Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

hydro-electric power generating facility. The expected cost of such a facility, including indirect costs, has been estimated at approximately $3 million and it would be capable of generating up to 4.2 megawatts of electricity. The Committee was informed that at this stage it was not envisaged that this element of the project would be developed.

RETICULATION SYSTEMS

56 The full extent of the development of reticulation works will not be known until the final decision is made on which areas are to receive water. This decision will be based in part upon the demand for water, the economics of providing water to an area and the environmental impact involved. Some water may be released through a diversion from the largest of the saddle dams through the range into the Cattle Creek Valley. Alternatively, water may be released to Palmtree Creek which runs to Cattle Creek and then into the Pioneer River. An additional intake associated with or near the main outlet structure could direct water into a gravity pipeline to supply the upper Cattle Creek region near Finch Hatton village.

57 While a number of potential users of Teemburra waters can pump directly from existing creeks, a considerable proportion can not and these landholders will require additional reticulation works to be constructed. It has been estimated that the development cost for reticulation is some $3,000 per hectare, and involves a number of pumping stations, balancing storages, pipelines and channels.

15 Funding Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

FUNDING

COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION

58 The project has received an amount of $10.53 million in Commonwealth funding under the terms of the Commonwealth/State Sugar Industry Infrastructure Package which was announced in November 1993. To be eligible to receive funds under the package specific projects were required to be nominated by industry representatives and the local cane industry was required to contribute one third of the costs of the component for cane irrigation. The Sugar Industry Infrastructure package was designed to accelerate investment within the industry through the improvement of infrastructure and by alterations to elements of the regulatory environment including the pool pricing and assignment systems.

59 By way of background, sugar production is highly regulated through a system of entitlements which allow production of certain amounts of cane for specific mills. The Queensland Sugar Corporation then markets all sugar produced with sale proceeds being pooled for payment to growers. The assignment of land is part of the regulation of the industry, with the number of growers, area planted, location and types of planting, quality of sugar produced and number and size of mills all being controlled. Assignments are tracts of land approved for sugar production for a specified mill and are sized to match sugar production with mill capacity and subsequent acquisition of the crop for marketing. Cane growers can also obtain a farm peak which is an entitlement to receive a higher pool price for a set maximum tonnage of raw sugar. The higher price arises from the existence of two price pools, the lower price of Pool Two being paid for cane produced in excess of the farm peak but from assigned land. Since 1992 the difference in pool prices has been decreasing by two percent a year and it is currently eight percent.

QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION

60 The Queensland Government is the major contributor to the funding for this project. An amount of $31.17 million has been allocated to the Department of Primary Industries Capital Works budget for these works over the next two years.

61 Additional to this amount will be a $5 million loan to the area's yet to be established water board. This loan is to be made available through the Queensland Treasury Corporation and will be repaid over a period of 20 years from revenue gained from charges to water users.

INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTION

62 The total amount to be paid by the sugar industry as a whole is one third of the component of the scheme dedicated to cane irrigation purposes.

63 The Mackay Sugar Co-operative will provide an amount of $10 million as a contribution to the cost of the new facility. This amount will be paid as construction

16 Funding Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

is undertaken. Additional to this, individual farm users will provide funds to service the $5 million loan described in paragraph 61.

64 The Committee accepts the importance of the user pays principle in ensuring the optimal use of resources and the more transparent identification of government subsidies. This approach is broadly in line with that taken in the provision of other capital works by the public sector, is in accordance with guidelines established by the Queensland Treasury Corporation and recognises that commercial viability requires conditions which achieve payback in a reasonable time and which still can be seen to be just to the end users. However, the Committee understands that this dam will be operational for a period of up to 100 years and will continue to benefit users throughout that period. On that basis the appropriateness of the present approach needs to be confirmed.

FINANCIAL RISK

65 The Committee was initially concerned that some works associated with the project were proceeding even though all final approvals had not been received. These works were undertaken because of various factors, including the need to expend the funds being made available from the Sugar Industry Infrastructure Package by no later than June 1997 and also to take advantage of the earliest possible wet season. This meant that for the dam to be completed by the end of 1996 in time for the wet season it was necessary to start construction in December 1994.

66 On this basis, preliminary works on the access road of the site were commenced within existing road boundaries and pipework (which had a long production/delivery time) was ordered. The Committee understands that it is unlikely that the total costs associated with this preliminary work would exceed $2 million. If project approval had not been received the expenditure on the pipework would not have been totally at risk as an alternative use would be found for the pipework.

67 The Committee accepts that the Department has followed the required existing processes and made the correct decision to proceed, this being confirmed by the approval received from the Commonwealth authorities. It is essential, however, that where such situations arise that the processes in place ensure that the extent of risk is identified and accountability mechanisms properly protect public funds. While expenditure approvals over $500,000 require the approval of the Governor in Council, such approvals should only be sought after the risks involved have been identified to Government.

17 Environmental Considerations Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

68 As mentioned earlier in the report, under the terms of the Sugar Industry Infrastructure Package an extensive environment assessment process has been established which involves a number of State and Federal departments and agencies together with various consultants and community groups. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries, as the lead agency for the project, is responsible for the implementation of all aspects of the project’s development and is required to comply with the environmental protection requirements of both the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage and the Commonwealth Environment Protection Agency. To meet these requirements he department has been required to develop an Impact Assessment Statement together with an Environmental Management Plan.

69 To assist in achieving this an Environmental Working Group was established to oversee the environmental activities of each element of the project's development. The group comprised representatives from the State Departments of Primary Industries, Environment and Heritage, and Housing, Local Government and Planning. Commonwealth agencies for the Environment and Primary Industries together with representatives from Canegrowers and the Australian Sugar Milling Council were also involved, however, the Committee understands that there were no representatives from the conservation movement at this level.

70 Additionally, a Local Management Group was formed from representatives of departments, instrumentalities and interest groups and Terms of Reference were established in conjunction with the Environmental Working Group. A consultant was also engaged following what was outlined to the Committee as the "normal competitive departmental process" to carry out the necessary evaluation. When Phase One of the Impact Assessment Study was completed it was made available for public input and a supplementary report, taking account of that input, was prepared. The Committee was informed that the Impact Assessment Statement was then considered by the Environmental Working Group and was ultimately submitted for approval by the Minister for Primary Industries and Energy. This approval was finally received in early February 1995.

71 In regard to community reaction to the dam's construction, the Department of Primary Industries' submission to the Committee notes that "even though some opposition to the construction of the dam was expressed in the public comment ... the environmental impact of the dam is minor".

72 However, in a submission to this Committee the Mackay Conservation Group raised a number of concerns, the most significant being that it felt "that correct procedures with regard to the Impact Assessment Statement have not been followed" and that the “construction of the dam has been treated as a fait accompli since day one by ministers, government departments and the media and the Impact Assessment Statement has been treated as a mere formality".

73 In the course of the public hearing a representative of the group further stated that "we feel there has been a consultative process, but we feel that, at the same time, there has

18 Environmental Considerations Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

been a certainty from very early on that the dam will be built rather than let us explore this". In relation to the possibility of developing a dam on Blacks Creek the representative added that "the process is wrong because we are seeing statements in the press from the Minister indicating that this is a fait accompli, just as the Teemburra Dam has been a fait accompli before the Impact Assessment Statement was even released" .

74 The Mackay Conservation Group also argued that the Impact Assessment Statement had not adequately addressed compensation for the loss of 600 hectares of open bloodwood forest as a result of the dam's construction. The group advocated that environmental compensation should be provided through the purchase or replanting of a similar area and type of vegetation in a nearby locality and that the costs of such compensation should be fully met by the beneficiaries of the scheme. The Committee understands that the Department has not previously embraced such an approach.

75 Similarly, the Mackay Conservation Group submission advocated the need to make the real costs of all aspects of the project transparent. There was, for example, no accounting for environmental losses and the group considered that "there should be an appropriate factoring into the economics of the dam a figure that allows for compensation and rehabilitation to take into account ... environmental losses". Additionally, the Group advocated that the implementation of the environmental monitoring process should be made more independent of government and that community groups should have increased access to Environmental Impact Statement consultants.

76 Another issue of concern to the representative of the Mackay Conservation Group was the fact that construction and upgrading of the access road to the dam site was proceeding prior to the full completion of the Impact Assessment Statement and before Commonwealth environmental approval for construction had been received. This was considered to lead to the possible public perception that the dam was always going to proceed irrespective of the formal impact assessment process.

77 In this respect the Committee examined Departmental representatives who provided evidence that the roadworks were required to be undertaken prior to final approval if the project was to be substantially completed prior to the 1996 wet season. However, the Committee was advised that works were undertaken at the full risk of the Queensland Government and that a stage would be reached in the process where the Department of Primary Industries would no longer proceed without final approval. This matter is also discussed earlier in this Report.

78 Additionally, the Group's submission drew attention to the Council of Australian Governments recommendations of February 1994 in relation to water resources policy "which embrace pricing reform based on the principles of consumption based pricing and full-cost recovery, the reduction or elimination of cross-subsidies and making subsidies transparent". The group stated that in the case of the Teemburra project, only 25% of the capital cost will be recovered from the beneficiaries and that more needs to be done in order to achieve water pricing reform and thereby minimise unsustainable natural resource use.

19 Environmental Considerations Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

79 The submission received from the Australian Conservation Foundation which also argued that the project ran contrary to the Council of Australian Governments’ water resources policy. In particular, it was argued that the potential water users (irrigators) will not be required to pay a price which covers the full capital and recurrent costs of the scheme, and that no dividends will be required to be paid to government.

80 The Committee accepts the general direction of full recovery of costs as outlined by the Council of Australian Governments’ recommendation, however, it notes that the agreement allows for an implementation period of up to the year 2001 for full compliance with the principle of full cost recovery.

81 In this regard the Committee also noted a response made by the consultants responsible for the development of the Impact Assessment Study and the Environmental Management Plan. It states that the proposal is consistent with the Principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development, as agreed by the Council of Australian Governments and further "It is important to observe the requirements for a balanced approach" and that "no objective or principle should predominate over the other ... Maintaining a balanced approach is not easy in an area where parties can readily adopt different definitions and interpretations of policies and principles".

82 The Committee agrees that different groups will make different interpretations and place different emphasis upon certain parts of these policies. In this respect the Committee considers that the key issue to be observed is that of balance between the various distinct positions.

83 The Australian Conservation Foundation submission also argued that alternatives to the construction of a new dam had not been adequately assessed, including on-site water collection systems; more judicious use of ground water resources; and improved water conservation including recycling by existing water users. The Committee accepts that potential exists for improvements in all of these areas and has made recommendations to this effect. However, it also recognises that a demand for additional irrigation water exists which is considerably beyond that able to be realised either economically or in volume by the re-allocation of existing supplies and improved demand management practices.

84 Concern was also expressed as to whether an assessment of the extent and impacts of additional polluted run-off which may occur as a result of increased irrigation had been made and particularly any possible impacts upon the Great Barrier Reef. In this respect the Supplementary Report on responses to the public review of Phase One of the Impact Statement and the Environmental Management Plan concludes that "there should be no increase in nutrient discharges or sediment loads from the cane farms following provision of additional water to existing farms ... The application of good practice and improved irrigation and farm management ... will ensure that water quality is maintained at acceptable levels".

85 A discussion paper prepared by the Department of Primary Industries entitled "State Water Conservation Strategy" notes that "there is considerable scope to expand the area under irrigation in Queensland by the development of economically viable schemes". The paper outlines existing and potential water needs and opportunities in Queensland and provides strategies which "recognise and take account of the need for

20 Environmental Considerations Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

ecologically sustainable development, micro-economic reform, industry promotion and facilitation, efficient resource use and regional development". In relation to managing natural resources, the paper notes that it "is essential that use of natural resources be sustainable in the long term ... and that in order to achieve this an Integrated Catchment Management approach is being adopted". These plans will form the basis for future water resource planning and management within Queensland and are supported by the Committee.

21 Community Facilities Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

FISH STOCKING

86 The Mackay Area Fish Stocking Association's submission highlighted a number of concerns in regard to the proposed dam, primary amongst these being the extent to which fish stocking may take place. The Committee was informed that relatively successful fish stocking had occurred at both the Kinchant and Eungella Dams and that stocks were provided by the Department of Primary Industries and by the fish stocking group. These fish were varieties local to the previous riparian systems, and were predominantly sooty grunter and sleepy cod. The Committee was informed that one of the major necessities with respect to achieving a successful fishery is the existence of adequate fish habitat and in the case of man-made dams, it is essential that adequate tree debris is maintained in the dam in order to provide such habitat. To illustrate this, the Committee was informed that in the case of Kinchant Dam the fishery was struggling due to the area being fully cleared of tree debris prior to its construction. It should be noted, however, that this dam is also used for water skiing and that the removal of previous vegetation would have safety benefits.

87 Another issue of concern to the Committee was that of the type of boats which may be allowed on the dam. The Committee was informed that considerable damage may occur to the edges of the dam from any use of high powered speed boats. However, the representative of the Mackay Fish Stocking Association advocated allowing some powered craft, suggesting that these be limited to no more than 25 horse power motors. This was considered necessary by the Association due to the size of the dam and for safety considerations such as escaping from storms which may develop quickly. The option of small electric powered motors was also raised as a possibility. The Committee accepts that some controls will be necessary, but makes the observation that damaging wash from boats can also be a factor of size, speed and hull configuration as well as power.

88 The Committee also examined the impact of a proposed fish lock proposed to be constructed on the main dam wall, the cost of which was reported to the Committee as being approximately $300,000. The Mackay Fish Stocking Group informed the Committee that a natural barrier existed several kilometres downstream which completely restricted the upstream movement of fish and that this outlay would therefore be wasteful. The association proposed that such money would be better spent on recreational facilities.

RECREATION

89 The Committee accepts that there is a strong community expectation that a certain level of facilities will be provided at the dam, including a camping reserve, showers and toilets, and an adequate boat ramp. The Committee notes that the supplementary report on the Environmental Impact Statement and the Environmental Management Plan includes mention of the provision of a small toilet block within the construction contract. In regard to the provision of a boat ramp, the submission from the Mackay Area Fish Stocking Association suggests that a boat ramp must be provided to enable

22 Community Facilities Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

maximum usage by minimal impact pastimes such as recreational fishing, canoeing and sailing. The association also supported a small user pays charge to be levied for users of the lake for recreational purposes, perhaps on a per boat licence basis.

23 Conclusion Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

CONCLUSION

90 The Committee was informed that the project is considered as a core activity of the Department and is clearly linked to the goals of its Corporate Plan and the Water Services Program. The first Corporate Goal of the Department is "to sustain or enhance the productivity capacity and quality of the natural resources on which industries are based", and the Water Services Program goals include "to increase the net benefits to industry and the community from the development and management of State-owned water infrastructure".

91 The Water Production Program within the Department of Primary Industries was reviewed as part of the formal Treasury Program Evaluation in April 1993. The Program's performance was generally evaluated as favourable with a number of recommendations for improvements suggested. The Committee was informed that where relevant, these improvements have been incorporated in the procedures for the development of this project.

92 The report concluded in part that the “Program has fulfilled its traditional development obligation quite well, by ensuring the provision of water services relevant to the State’s development needs. However, the program needs to be more responsive to the emerging issues such as sustainable and wise water use, environmental issues, commercial objectives and community expectations". The Committee accepts that the program has improved its efforts in regard to each of the above, but considers that more remains to be undertaken particularly in the area of demand management.

93 As a result of this inquiry, the Public Works Committee accepts that the construction of the Teemburra Dam will provide substantial benefits to both the regional and State economies and that the project will have a number of environmental impacts. It considers, however, that the benefits of the project outweigh the costs but the establishment and successful implementation of the Environmental Management Plan is essential.

94 The Committee also notes the concerns expressed by some members of the community in regard to the capacity and likely speed of filling of the dam. It accepts, however, the assurances offered by the Department of Primary Industries in this regard in relation to economic viability and safety.

95 The Committee is also aware of a level of resistance to the application of user pays principles to the capital costs of the project. It must be stated, however, that many individuals will benefit greatly from the development of the project through improved levels of production. In addition to this, those properties which will now have access to guaranteed irrigation are likely to see an increase in property value as a direct result of the capital investment being made in the Teemburra Dam.

96 In terms of project implementation, the Committee has been impressed by the high level of professionalism and commitment demonstrated by officers of the Department in their approach to the project. The Committee is also grateful for the high level of

24 Conclusion Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

co-operation given by the Department and the comprehensive documentation, briefings and answers it has supplied to the Committee during the course of the inquiry.

25 Recommendations Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

RECOMMENDATIONS

97 The Committee recommends:

(1) That in future projects pre-construction works only proceed if:

(a) all necessary approvals have been obtained, or

(b) it can be demonstrated to the responsible Minister that the project will suffer substantially if such works do not proceed and the approval of Cabinet is obtained for any associated financial risk.

In addition affected interest groups must be informed of the nature and necessity of such works so as not to diminish community confidence in the environmental, or other, planning process. (Paragraph 67)

(2) That the Department of Primary Industries initiate discussions with its Federal counterpart to achieve more streamlined and less complex procedures within the constraints imposed by Council of Australian Governments’ agreements. (Paragraph 37)

(3) That the Department of Primary Industries take action to improve the level of hydrological data in areas of potential new storages throughout the State. (Paragraph 25)

(4) That the Department of Primary Industries continue to actively encourage the use of demand management techniques in all irrigation areas. (Paragraph 19)

(5) That the continued development of equitable user pays principles be utilised in all new dam projects. (Paragraph 64)

(6) That the Department of Primary Industries ensure that historical users of water are adequately considered in the development of this project. (Paragraph 31)

(7) That the need for construction of a fish lock on the main dam be further investigated. (Paragraph 88)

(8) That the size, power and type of boating to be permitted on the dam be determined after consultation with appropriate local authorities, agencies and affected community groups. (Paragraph 87)

(9) That the extent of public access and provision of recreational facilities be determined in conjunction with local authorities and recreation user groups and be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Management Plan. (Paragraph 89)

26 Appendix A Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

APPENDIX A — CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS

27 Appendix B Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

APPENDIX B — LIST OF SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED

Mr R Boyle Mr Bill McGarry Department of Business, Industry Secretary and Regional Development Mackay Area Fish Stocking Association GPO Box 1141 PO Box 1078 BRISBANE QLD 4001 MACKAY QLD 4740

Mr Tom Fenwick Mr R J Mullins Director-General Manager Department of Primary Industries Mackay District Canegrowers GPO Box 46 PO Box 117 BRISBANE QLD 4001 MACKAY QLD 4740

Mr J A Bird Ms Jacki Wirth Chairperson Mackay Conservation Group Inc The Mackay Electricity Board PO Box 826 PO Box 259 MACKAY QLD 4740 MACKAY QLD 4740

Mr R N Chapman Acting General Manager Canegrowers GPO Box 1032 BRISBANE QLD 4001

Mr Peter Derrett Managing Director Queensland Bagasse Pty Ltd 3 Edward Street NEDLANDS WA 6009

Mr Barry Evans Chief Executive Officer Mirani Shire Council PO Box 1 MIRANI QLD 4754

Mr Tim Fisher Natural Resources Campaign Co-ordinator Australian Conservation Foundation 340 Gore Street FITZROY VIC 3065

28 Appendix C Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

APPENDIX C — LIST OF WITNESSES

Mr John Palmer Mr John McKay Department of Primary Industries Mackay Sugar Co-operative Assoc Ltd PO Box 668 PO Box 5720 MACKAY QLD 4740 MACKAY MAIL CENTRE QLD 4741

Mr Ian Pullar Mr Ted Malone MLA Manager (Scheme Planning) Member for Mirani Water Production Division PO Box 56 Department of Primary Industries SARINA QLD 4737 GPO Box 2454 BRISBANE QLD 4001 Mr Douglas Neville Mackay Sugar Co-operative Assoc Ltd Mr Brian Shannon PO Box 5720 Principal Engineer (Engineering Services) MACKAY MAIL CENTRE QLD 4741 Water Production Division Department of Primary Industries Councillor Clive Rogers GPO Box 2454 Mayor BRISBANE QLD 4001 Mirani Shire Council PO Box 1 Mr Andrew Barfield MIRANI QLD 4754 Mackay District Canegrowers Association 17 Broadsound Road Mr Sib Torrisi PAGET QLD Mail Service 217 MACKAY QLD 4740 Mr Keith Blinco The Mackay Electricity Board Dr Michael Williams PO Box 259 President MACKAY QLD 4740 Mackay Conservation Group Inc 156 Wood Street Mr John Darlington MACKAY QLD 4740 Mackay District Canegrowers Association 17 Broadsound Road PAGET QLD

Mr Keith Day Chairman Mackay Area Fish Stocking Association PO Box 1078 MACKAY QLD 4740

Mr Barry Evans Chief Executive Officer Mirani Shire Council PO Box 1 MIRANI QLD 4754

29 Appendix D Development of the Teemburra Dam and Associated Irrigation Areas

APPENDIX D — LOCATION PLAN

30 PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC WORKS

No. Report Date Tabled 1 Annual Report for the Period Ending 30 June 1989 6 July 1989 2 Inquiry into the Proposed Construction by the Brisbane and Area Water Board of a 28 September 1989 Dam on the Albert River at Wolffdene (September 1989) Report for the Period 1 July to 19 October 1989 19 October 1989 3 No Public Works Committee Report No. 3 was issued 4 Annual Report for the Period 6 March to 30 June 1990 23 August 1990 5 Bundaberg Hospital Redevelopment - Stage Two (October 1990) 24 October 1990 6 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Housing - The Future (May 1991) 28 May 1991 7 Annual Report for the Period 1 July 1990 to 30 June 1991 18 July 1991 8 Building Another Mental Institution or Housing a New Mental Health Service? - A 24 October 1991 Report on Community Debate Concerning Construction of the New Kirwan Psychiatric Rehabilitation Unit (October 1991) 9 Consultation and Planning for Schools and Colleges between State and Local 5 December 1991 Authorities (November 1991) 10 The Proposal to Build a 33-Level Office Block at 111 George Street (November 1991) 5 December 1991 Annual Report for Year 1991-1992 25 November 1992 11 Kirwan Psychiatric Rehabilitation Centre 2 March 1993 12 The Proposed Upgrade of the Townsville Correctional Centre 3 March 1993 13 Public Housing in Toowoomba 19 March 1993 14 The Development of the Sciencentre - the Old Government Printery 13 May 1993 15 Queensland Centre for Advanced Technologies 13 May 1993 16 Cairns Courthouse, Police Headquarters and Watchhouse Complex 20 May 1993 17 Replacement Schools for Herberton and Mission Beach 15 July 1993 Annual Report for Year 1992-1993 1 September 1993 18 Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre 13 October 1993 19 The Construction of New Government Office Accommodation in Rockhampton 18 November 1993 20 Health Facilities in Far North Queensland - Preliminary Report 3 December 1993 21 Health Facilities in Far North Queensland - Final Report 25 February 1994 22 Cairns Convention Centre 28 April 1994 23 Landsborough Highway, Jessamine Creek, and University Road, Townsville 28 April 1994 Annual Report for Year 1993-94 2 August 1994 24 The Development of Mountain Creek High School 31 August 1994 25 Nambour Hospital Block 6 and Associated Matters 9 September 1994 26 Queensland Cultural Centre - Stage Five 28 October 1994 27 Technology Facilities Toowoomba College of Technical and Further Education 23 February 1995

This Committee tables transcripts of evidence; however, they are not numbered and they are not included in this list.

Table of Contents