DOCSLIB.ORG

In the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1123/2006 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1091/2006 CRL.A.No.1123/2006 BETWEEN: 1. GAFFUR KHAN @ GAFFUR S/O MUSTAN PARI, 35 YEARS KUMARAPET, PUTTANPARTHI VILLAGE ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT, A.P 2. NARAYANSWAMY S/O PEDDANNA, 60 YEARS R/AT GORANTLI ANANTHAPRUA DISTRICT, A.P 2. ANWARTHAN S/O LATE HASSANKHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS WELDING WORK R/AT SHIALAYAM ROAD PUTTANPARTHI VILLAGE ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT, A.P. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI N SRINIVAS, ADV.) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDNG BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI B T VENKATESH, SPP-II) 2 THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374 CR.P.C., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.04.2006, PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, I FAST TRACK COURT AT SHIMOGA IN S.C.NO.115/2005, CONVICTING APPELLANTS-ACCUSED 1, 2 & 4 FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 395, 295 & 427 R/W 34 IPC & ETC. CRL.A.No.1091/2006 BETWEEN: PRAKASH REDDY S/O JAYARAMAREDDY AGED 25 YEARS SHAMIYANA VENDING SHOP R/O PEDDA BAZAAR PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI N SRINIVAS, ADV.) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE – 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI B T VENKATESH, SPP-II) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) CR.P.C., AGAINST THE JUDGEMNT DATED 29.04.2006 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-I AT SHIMOGA IN S.C.NO.115/2005, CONVICTING APPELLANT-ACCUSED NO.5 FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 395, 295 & 427 R/W 34 IPC & ETC. *** THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 3 J U D G M E N T The appellants (hereinafter referred to as ‘accused 1 to 5’) were tried, convicted and sentenced for offences punishable under Sections 427, 395, 295 r/w 34 IPC. Accused 6 to 10 were absconding. Therefore, case against them was separated. Accused 1, 2, 4 and 5 have filed these appeals against impugned judgment of conviction. 2. I have heard Sri.N.Srinivas, learned counsel for accused and learned State Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. In brief, the case of prosecution is as follows:- There is a temple of Sri Neelakanteshwara in Balligavi village within the jurisdiction of Shiralakoppa Police Station, Shimoga District. There is a Shivalinga and a statue of bull (Basava) in the temple. It is one of the ancient temples. The accused who hail from Puttaparthi, Gorantla and Khadri of Ananthpur District had come to the temple at about 11.00 p.m., on 13.06.2005. They had brought a gas cylinder and a 4 gas cutter for cutting the base of Shivalinga and also pedestal of Bull (Basava) as they had believed that there was hidden treasure beneath Shivalinga and idol of bull (Basava). It appears, the temple was not properly guarded. The accused along with absconding accused and some other persons entered and displaced the statue of bull (Basava) and they were cutting the base of Shivalinga with the fond hope of finding hidden treasure beneath Shivalinga and idol of bull. At that time, the villagers of Balligavi village heard the noise from the side of temple and reached the temple. The accused and other persons came out of the temple and they were holding weapons. When the villagers tried to apprehend them, they inflicted injuries to PW3 & PW4 and threw stones at the villagers. The villagers also threw stones at accused and they chased them. Accused 1 and 2 fell down, therefore, the villagers, including the prosecution witnesses caught hold of them. In the meanwhile, the mater had been informed to police. The jurisdictional police officer came to the place, on the way they apprehended accused 3 5 to 5 and brought them to temple. The jurisdictional police officer inspected the temple and found that there was a gas cylinder and a gas cutter. On inquiry, the Investigation Officer came to know that accused hail from Ananthpur District of Andhra Pradesh which is at a distance of 500 kilometers from Balligavi village of Shiralakoppa Taluk. 4. The police inspector prepared the inspection report and seized incriminating articles namely MO.1-Gas Cylinder of 4”, MO.2-3” Gas Cylinder, MO.3-two rubber pipes fitted with meter gauge, MO.4- 5 Kg. gas cylinder, MO.5-‘T’ Shape box spanner, MO.6-two hand gloves, MO.7-Iron patti of 14 ½”, MO.8- Iron Uli, MO.9-Two Plastic old bags, MO.10- two gunny bags, MO.11-Turkey towel, MO.12-two old bedsheets, MO.13-one stone, MO.14-9” folding knife and MO.15- 8” folding knife from the possession of accused. After completing the arrest formalities they were produced before the learned Magistrate on 14.06.2005. The injured persons were treated in the hospital. The charge sheet was filed against accused for aforestated offences. 6 5. The plea of accused is one of total denial. 6. Before adverting to appreciation of evidence adduced by prosecution, it is necessary to refer to glaring incriminating circumstances appearing against accused. As already stated, accused hail from Puttaparthi, Khadri, Gorantla of Anathpur District of Andhra Pradesh. The accused were arrested by police near Sri Neelakanteshwara Temple situate at Balligavi village within the jurisdiction of Shiralakoppa Taluk, Shimoga District, which is at a distance of 500 kilometers from the place of accused. 7. The accused have not given plausible explanation for their presence during odd hours near the place of incident. It is not the case of accused, they were on a pilgrimage. It is not the case of accused, they had come to the place as pilgrims. The accused had brought gas cutters and a gas cylinder. They were also in possession of spanners, hand gloves, chisels, gunny bags, stones and two folding knives. The possession of these weapons and incriminating articles 7 by accused would lead to an inference that accused had come to Sri Neelakanteshwara temple to cut the base of Shivalinga and displaced the idol of bull (Basava) under the belief that there was hidden treasure beneath Shivalinga and the idol of bull (Basava). These facts are established from evidence of Investigation Officer and other witnesses who reached the temple immediately after accused were apprehended and found that base of Shivalinga was cut and idol of bull was displaced. The Investigation Officer had also taken photographs of base of Shivalinga and displaced idol of Bull marked as Ex.P3. Therefore, apart from oral evidence, there are strong incriminating circumstances to infer the intention of accused which in fact was manifest by the acts committed by them inside Sri Neelakanteshwara Temple of Balligavi village. 8. PW1-N.Nagaraja, PW2-Rudrappa, PW3- Virupakshappa, PW4-Ramesha and PW5-D.Rudrappa are residents of Balligavi Village. 8 9. PW2-Rudrappa has deposed; on 13.06.2005 at about 11 to 11.15 p.m. he saw flash of light; he also heard sound of cutting some object; as he was afraid of going to Sri Neelakanteshwara Temple, he informed other witnesses, who came along with PW2 reached Sri Neelakanteshwara Temple by holding torches; when PW2 reached temple, 3-4 persons came out of temple and ran away; PW2 and other witnesses chased those persons; accused by name Gafoor Khan was holding a knife and threatened them by showing knife; PW2 & PW1 apprehended Gafoor Khan (accused No.1) and other persons by name Shivakumar and Mahesh apprehended accused No.2-Narayanaswamy; PW2 has identified accused 1 & 2 before court; in the meanwhile, police who had learnt about incident, on their way to place of incident, apprehended accused 3 to 5, who had ran away from place of incident; accused No.3-Srinivasa was driver of Tata Sumo bearing No.AP-9-W-7673, in which accused had come to Balligavi Village; police inspected Sri Neelakanteshwara Temple and found a gas cylinder, a gas cutter, a gas light, a hammer 9 and a chisel; PW2 has identified incriminating articles marked as M.O.1 to M.O.13; they had also noticed that Shivalinga had been displaced and idol of ‘Basava’ (bull) had also been displaced. During cross-examination, PW2 has reiterated version given in examination-in-chief. PW2 has denied suggestion that accused were not apprehended by them. 10. At this juncture, it is relevant to state that accused were not known to PW2. PW2 had no reasons to implicate them. The accused have sought to establish that PW2 could not have identified accused under the cover of darkness. PW2 has deposed that he could identify accused in the light flashed by torch. Therefore, there are no reasons to suspect or discard evidence of PW2. 11. The evidence of PW3-Virupakshappa is similar to evidence of PW2-Rudrappa. PW3 has deposed; when he tried to apprehend accused, some of accused pelted stones and PW3 suffered injuries and he was treated in hospital. 10 12. PW13-Dr.L.Gangibai has deposed; on 14.06.2005 at about 10.30 a.m., she examined PW3 and found following injuries:- I. 4 to 5 abrasions on left knee joint measuring ½ cm x ½ cm. II. 8 to 10 abrasions measuring ½ cm x ½ cm. Thus, we find that PW3 had suffered injuries in the incident. These injuries would lend corroboration to evidence of PW3. 13. At this juncture, it is relevant to state that incident had taken place at about 11 p.m., on 13.06.2005.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IHCNF Newsletter July 2017
    Newsletter of Indian Heritage Cities Network Foundation (IHCNF) In-Heritance For the Future of Our Cities VOL. 2 ISSUE NO.7 July 2017 From IHCNF Desk in Bangalore Greetings, It is always a great pleasure for the IHCNF team 5th July, ED and DP IHCNF made a two day to put together the monthly newsletter to keep trip to New Delhi with a series of meeting Inside this Issue our reader base updated with our activities. held on matters related to HRIDAY, Biennial Here is bringing to you the July newsletter. Conference, Karez Conference, Community Radio Station etc. Feature Article Pg 2 July of 2017 was an exciting month, not just at IHCNF but for heritage enthusiasts all over India Executive Director and Director Projects A short glimpse into as Ahmadabad got designated as India’s first visited Bidar for venue selection for the the historically rich village of UNESCO World Heritage City. This prestigious International Conference on Karez, scheduled Balligavi in Shivamogga district, recognition for the city is the result of the for the 29th-31st of October. A meeting notified as a ‘heritage by area’ unrelenting effort of the various stakeholders regarding the Zero Waste Management the Government of and IHCNF sends heartiest congratulations Project was also held with the Commissioner Karnataka in 2012-13. to each and everyone involved. of the Bidar City Municipal Council. The month of July started off with Government On 13th July, ED visited Mysuru to meet with of Karnataka entrusting the work of preparing Dr Niranjan, Registrar of the Karnataka State Project Update Pg 3 the nomination dossier for the Deccan Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts ...6
    RP946 v4 GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT KARNATAKA STATE HIGHWAYS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - II Public Disclosure Authorized RESETTLEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN WAP 3 (Shikaripura – Hanagal) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized June 2012 Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project –II Resettlement Implementation Plan WAP-3 (Shikaripura - Hanagal) Contents ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 3 Objectives of RIP .............................................................................................................................. 4 Main activities of RIP ....................................................................................................................... 4 Minimization of Impacts and Corridor of Impact ......................................................................... 4 II. LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS ..................................................... 6 Land Acquisition Status ...................................................................................................................... 6 Guidance Value ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IHCNF Newsletter August 2017
    Newsletter of Indian Heritage Cities Network Foundation (IHCNF) In-Heritance For the Future of Our Cities VOL. 2 ISSUE NO.8 AUGUST 2017 From IHCNF Desk in Bangalore Inside this Issue: Greetings to all! Feature Article Pg 2 We are glad to present to you our 8th issue of As part on the ongoing collaborations with In-heritance-our monthly newsletter for the ICQHS for the Bidar Karez project, Mr Majid A short glimpse into the month of August 2017. In this issue, you will Labbaf Khaneiki, the Senior Expert from ICQHS, historically rich town of Melkote find activities IHCNF undertook this month, Iran visited Bidar, Vijayapura and Bangalore in Mandya district, notified as a feature article on the historic town of Melkote from the 16th to 21st August 2017. Series of ‘heritage area’ by the and updates from our partners. meeting, workshops, stakeholder consultation Government of Karnataka in 2012-13. Earlier this month on 11th of August 2017 the was held during his visit. This was Mr. Majid Department of Tourism, Government of Khaneiki’s third visit to India and other project Karnataka and IHCNF signed an MOU for the partners notably DHF and IIT Hyderabad also Project Updates Pg 3 development of 12 heritage tourism participated in the deliberations. destinations in Karnataka. Status of ongoing Projects and Activities IHCNF Also this month IHCNF Chairman, Dr. M Ramachandran called on the newly elected Tourism Destination Vice President of India, Shri M Venkaiah Naidu Development, Karnataka in New Delhi and felicitated him. Karez Projects- Bidar and Vijayapura HRIDAY Scheme News & Information Pg 4 This month, the site inspection for the project News & Information from our ‘Integrated Development and Improvement of partners Arterial Road, Transportation Infrastructure’ was started by SMD Construction, contractors Top Cover Page Credit: Abhijit P for the project, under the ongoing implementation of HRIDAY scheme in Badami.
    [Show full text]
  • Shimoga District Profile.Pdf
    Contents S. No. Topic Page No. 1. General Characteristics of the District 1-2 1.1 Location & Geographical Area 3 1.2 Topography 3 1.3 Availability of Minerals. 4 1.4 Forest 4 1.5 Administrative set up 4 2. District at a glance 5-6 2.1 Existing Status of Industrial Area in the District 7 3. Industrial Scenario of Shimoga District 8 3.1 Industry at a Glance 8 3.2 Year Wise Trend of Units Registered 8 3.3 Details of Existing Micro & Small Enterprises & Artisan Units 9 in the District 3.4 Large Scale Industries / Public Sector undertakings 10 3.5 Major Exportable Item 10 3.6 Growth Trend 10 3.7 Vendorisation / Ancillarisation of the Industry 10 3.8 Medium Scale Enterprises 11 3.9 Service Enterprises 11 3.9.1 Potentials areas for service industry 11 3.9.2 Service Enterprises having scope in Shimoga district. 11 3.10 Potential for new MSMEs 11-12 4. Existing Clusters of Micro & Small Enterprise 12 4.1 Details of Major Clusters 12 4.1.1 Manufacturing Sector 12 4.1.2 Service Sector 12 4.2 Details of Identified cluster 12 4.1.2 Service Sector 12 5. General issues raised by industry association during the course of 15 meeting 6. Steps to set up MSME 16 Brief Industrial Profile of District 1. General Characteristics of the District: Shimoga, the district head quarter, as per traditional derivations, the name pertains to Lord Shiva (‘Shiva – Mukha’ – Face of Shiva, “Shivana – Mogu’ – Nose of Shiva, ‘Shivana – Mogge’ – Buds of flowers meant for Shiva).
    [Show full text]
  • Gandaberunda: Aesthetic Representation of the Mythical Bird
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8, Issue- 7C2, May 2019 Gandaberunda: Aesthetic Representation of the Mythical Bird Gomathi Gowda passage to the left of the figure. It may be mentioned that the Abstract— Indian Art is predominantly decorative in donor, Bhaktiraja, enjoyed the title Gaṇḍabheruṇḍa. Mostly character and birds occupy an important position in plastic and confined to Andhra, it is noticed in the same form in the pictorial representation. Birds such as the Garuda, Peacock and Tripurantakam (Kurnool district) inscription (saka 1310) of others are connected with important mythological stories and in Annadeva, Vinukonda (district Guntur) inscription (Saka the stories of Jataka, most other birds are carved, painted as an integral part of the design. 1377). (Sarkar. H and Pande B.M 1999: 75) Of the mythical birds, Garuda, the vehicle of Vishnu, is The Gaṇḍabheruṇḍa had strange associations and scholars well-represented in medieval records. In south, another kind of have suggested various origins of it. Marshall contended that mythical bird is noticed in the inscription known as this double-headed eagle occurs for the first time in the gaṇḍabheruṇḍa. In Sanskrit the word bheruṇḍa means terrific, Hittite sculptures in Western Asia, that it is also found on an frightful, terrible, a species of bird while gaṇḍa is understood to early ivory of the Geometric period from Sparta and that later imply a warrior or hero. The term gaṇḍabheruṇḍa was adopted on the Scythians introduced it to taxila (Taksasila). From as a title by the Chalukyas, Kadambas and the Vijayanagara rulers.
    [Show full text]
  • BLO LIST- 115- SHIKARIPURA.Xls
    Name And Addresss of the BLO,s Name of the Assembly Constituency:115-Shikaripur Total no of Parts in the AC; 192 Total No ofBLO,s In the AC; 192 Name of the Part No Complete Address of the Blo Contact no BLO,s 1 Yogish Villege Accountent Kanasogi 9740771808 2 Pikya nayak Assistant teacher HPS kanasogi 9900485814 B s.Prasana 3 Villege Accountent Yelagere 9901771706 Kumar 4 Dakya Naik.L Assistant teacher HPS Shnkrikoppa 9742234917 5 Sathish,K,G Assistant teacher HPS Chikkamagadi 9980933981 6 Rameshappa.B Assistant teacher HPS Chikkamagadi 9900401311 G,Veerabhadra Sec GP. Inam 7 9480876303 ppa Agraharamacudi 8 Shilppa Villege Accountent Mallenahalli 9901897635 BasvarajappaV 9 Assistant teacher HPS Mallenahalli 9980777057 adpura Chandrappa.H. 10 Assistant teacher HPSMalavalli 9880799135 B 11 Nagaraja.B Assistant teacher HPSMalavalli Tanda 9945384125 12 Gangadarappa Villege Accountent Karnalli 9945771245 Shanmukappa. 13 Assistant teacher HPS Ragikoppa 938980708 E.K 14 Swetha Assistant teacher HPS Shirihalli 9164109840 15 Pavana Villege Accountent Inam,Agrahara macudi 9945042440 16 Lokappa Sec GP.Narasapura 9480876737 17 Srinivasa Villege Accountent Biliki 9880305284 Nagaraj 18 Assistant teacher HPS Biliki 916424356 Hosamani 19 Kumar M.D Assistant teacher HPS Kanahalli 9481494638 20 Gasi R.M Assistant teacher HPS Kowli 9880151631 21 Devendrappa Sec GP.Thogarsi 9731142728 Hanumanthapp 22 Villege Accountent Thogarsi 9902143197 a 23 Srinivasa.CLN Villege Accountent Kodihalli 9611332494 24 A.G.Teymbe Assistant teacher HPS Devikoppa 9480613489 25 Nagaraj.D Assistant teacher HPS Haragi 9141670682 26 Nagaraj Assistant teacher HPS Hunasekatte 9008852788 27 Sidogi Sec GP.Haragi 9480876319 Basavarajappa. 28 Assistant teacher HPS Mallur 9964549298 B.H 29 Basavarajappa.
    [Show full text]
  • Division Wise Number of Protected Monuments and Archaeological Sites in Karnataka
    Division wise Number of protected Monuments and Archaeological Sites in Karnataka State ASI Total Protected S. No Division Monument / Sites Monument / Sites Monuments S. No S. No S. No Total TO % Total TO % Total TO % 1 Bangalore 105 12.44 63 10.34 168 11.56 2 Belgaum 365 43.25 311 51.07 676 46.52 3 249 29.50 164 26.93 413 28.42 Kalgurugi 4 125 14.81 71 11.66 196 13.51 Mysore Total 844 100.00 609 100.00 1453 100.00 Division wise Number of protected Monuments and Archaeological Sites in Karnataka Bangalore Division Serial Per Total No. of Overall pre- Name of the District Number Total No. of cent Per protected protected ASI Total No. of Monument / Sites cent % Monument / protected Monument / Sites % Sites monuments 1 Bangalore City 7 2 9 2 Bangalore Rural 9 5 14 3 Chitradurga 8 6 14 4 Davangere 8 9 17 5 Kolara 15 6 21 6 Shimoga 12 26 38 7 Tumkur 29 6 35 8 Chikkaballapur 4 2 6 9 Ramanagara 13 1 14 Total 105 12.44 63 10.34 168 11.56 Division wise Number of protected Monuments and Archaeological Sites in Karnataka Belgaum Division Total No. of Overall pre- Serial Per Name of the District Total No. of Per protected protected Number cent ASI Total No. of Monument / Sites cent % Monument / protected % Monument / Sites Sites monuments 10 Bagalkot 22 110 132 11 Belgaum 58 38 96 12 Vijayapura 45 96 141 13 Dharwad 27 6 33 14 Gadag 44 14 58 15 Haveri 118 12 130 16 Uttara Kannada 51 35 86 Total 365 43.25 311 51.07 676 46.52 Division wise Number of protected Monuments and Archaeological Sites in Karnataka Kalburagi Division Serial Per Total protected
    [Show full text]
  • KANNADA UNIVERSITY, HAMPI Department of Epigraphy PG
    KANNADA UNIVERSITY, HAMPI Department of Epigraphy PG DIPLOMA IN EPIGRAPHY (CBCS) (Syllabus For the academic Year 2017-2018) Teaching Examination Marks- Duration of Paper no Subject Name Units Credits Hours 70 Examination & Internal Marks-30 DP5ES01 Method and Methods 5 4 4 70 30 100 3 DP5ES02 Palaeography 5 4 4 70 30 100 3 DP5ES03 Important Inscription 5 4 4 70 30 100 3 Texts DP5ES04 Experiment 5 4 4 70 30 100 3 KANNADA UNIVERSITY, HAMPI Department of Epigraphy PG DIPLOMA IN EPIGRAPHY (CBCS) (Syllabus For the academic Year 2017-2018) Paper -1 Research of Inscription : Method & Methods Unit-1.1 Inscription Definition and History Unit-1.2 Importance of Inscription and verities of Inscription Unit-1.3 Intrusions of Indian Inscription Unit-1.4 Nature of Research Method and Methods Unit-1.5 Research of Inscription — meaning Assumption Unit-1.6 Hypothesis, period finding , notes, Method Unit-1.7 Put note method, classification of sources Unit-1.8 tools and techniques paper 2 : 2 Paleography Unit-2.1 paleography Birth and Development Unit -2.2 what is the meaning of paleography Unit -2.3 Indian paleography Unit -2.4 Kannada paleo styles Development and History Paper 3: 3 Important Inscription Texts Unit -3.3.1 Sanskrit — prakrut Unit -3.2.1 Ashok’s Bramhagiri and Maski Inscription Unit -3.2.2 Banavasi’s Nagasilpa Unit -3.3.3 Talagunda Inscription of Kakutsavarma Unit -3.3.4 Ihole Inscription of Ravikirti 3.2 Text of Kannada Inscription 1. Halmidi Inscription 2. Tammatakallu Inscription 3. Kapppeharabatta Inscription 4. Mangalesh’s 3“ Inscription 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Shimoga Category Wise Primary & HS List
    CATEGORYWISE GOVT. HPS FOR TRANSFERS 2009-10 SHIMOGA DISTRICT SL NO BLKNAME CL_NAME SCHCODE SCHNAME CATEGORY 1 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0100101 GHPS NIMBEGONDI C 2 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0100701 GKHPS VADERAPUR C 3 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0100804 GMHPS ANAVERI C 4 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0100901 GHPS ITTIGEHALLI C 5 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0101201 GKHPS GUDAMAGATTA C 6 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0101402 GHPS MANGOTE C 7 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0101501 GKHPS NAGASAMUDRA C 8 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0101702 GHPS MYDOLALU C 9 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0132001 GHPS GUDDADAMALLAPURA C 10 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0132101 GHPS SYDARAKALLAHALLI C 11 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0132102 GHPA ADRIHALLI C 12 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0132203 GHPS ARASANAGATTA C 13 BHADRAVATI ANAVERI 0133601 GHPS KURUBARA VITALAPURA C 14 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0105701 GHPS BELLIGERE C 15 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0107601 GHPS DEVARANARASIPURA B 16 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0107907 GHPS YAREHALLI B 17 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0109201 GHPS DODDERI C 18 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0109701 GHPS UKKUNDA C 19 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0109702 GHPS ANTHARAGENGE B 20 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0127801 GHPS GANDHINAGARA C 21 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0128101 GHPS GANGURU C 22 BHADRAVATI ANTARAGANGE 0128202 GHPS,BADANEHAL. C 23 BHADRAVATI ANWAR COLONY URDU-1 0102002 GUHPS TADASA C 24 BHADRAVATI ANWAR COLONY URDU-1 0102513 GUHPBS HOLEHONNURU C 25 BHADRAVATI ANWAR COLONY URDU-1 0102702 GUHPS JAMBARAGATTA C 26 BHADRAVATI ANWAR COLONY URDU-1 0103903 GUHPS YADEHALLI C 27 BHADRAVATI ANWAR COLONY URDU-1 0110603 GUHPGS DONABAGATTA C 28 BHADRAVATI ANWAR COLONY URDU-1 0110604 GUHPBS
    [Show full text]
  • Rol Aug 2015 Dr. Subhaschandra Doddamani
    Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716(UIF) ISSN 2347-2723 Volume - 2 | Issue - 1 | Aug - 2015 ART AND ARCHITECTURE OF RASHTRA KUTA DYNASTY Dr. Subhaschandra Doddamani Lecturer in History ABSTRACT he Rashtrakutas who managed the deccan from Manyakheta, Gulbarga region, Karnataka in the Tperiod AD 753 - 973 constructed a portion of the finest dravidian landmarks at Ellora (the Kailasanatha sanctuary), in the stone cut engineering Development. Some other fine landmarks are the Jaina Narayana sanctuary at Pattadakal and the Navalinga sanctuaries at Kuknur in Karnataka. The Rashtrakutas contributed much to the way of life of the Deccan. The Rashtrakuta commitments to craftsmanship and engineering are reflected in the breathtaking rock-cut hallowed places at Ellora and Elephanta58, arranged in present day Mahárashtra. It is said that they out and out built 34 rock-cut hallowed places, yet most broad and extravagant of every one of them is the Kailasanatha sanctuary at Ellora. The sanctuary is an unbelievable accomplishment of Dravidian workmanship. The dividers of the sanctuary have radiant figures from Hindu mythology including Ravana, Úhiva and Parvathi while the roofs have depictions. KEYWORDS :Rashtra Kuta Dynasty , Hindu mythology , Art and Architecture . INTRODUCTION : Rashtrakuta was an illustrious line controlling expansive parts of the Indian Subcontinent between the 6th and tenth hundreds of years. The soonest known Rashtrakuta engraving is a seventh century copper plate award enumerating their guideline from Manapura, a city in Central or West India. Other decision Rashtrakuta factions from the same time frame said in engravings were the rulers of Achalapur (present day Elichpur in Maharashtra) and the leaders of Kannauj.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY Geographically Located on the South Western Part of South India, Karnataka Has Abundant Natural Resources
    Chapter II HISTORY Geographically located on the south western part of South India, Karnataka has abundant natural resources. Its western ghats with rich forest resources, and plain valleys, is crowned with more prosperous narrow coast line. Its Mangalore Newport has enhanced its value in terms of international trade with rich foreign exchange. Above all, it has rich cultural tradition and puranic legends of historical importance. Pre History : Karnataka has a hoary past. It is blessed with innumerable inscriptions, memorial (viz. Hero, Mahasati and Self immolation) stones and monuments of rich historical and cultural heritage. It has many sites of Pre- historic period and most of them are found scattered on the river valleys of Krishna, Bhima, Malaprabha, Ghataprabha, Cauvery, Hemavathi, Shimsha, Tungabhadra, Manjra, Pennar, Netravati etc. and their tributaries. It is very interesting to note that the Pre-historic studies in India started with the discovery of ashmounds at Kupgal and Kudatini in 1836 by Cuebold, a British offcer in Bellary region, which then formed part of Madras Presidency. Subsequent discoveries have revealed the existence of stone age man with innumerable Pre-historic sites in Karnataka. The Pre-historic culture of Karnataka viz., the Hand-axe culture, compares favourably with the one that existed in Africa and is quite distinct from the Pre-historic culture of North India. Places like Hunasagi, Gulbal, Kaladevanahalli, Tegginahalli, Budihal, Piklihal, Kibbanahalli, Nittur, Anagavadi, Kaladgi, Khyad, Nyamati, Balehonnur and Uppinangadi (Lower Palaeolithic) ; Herakal, Tamminahal, Savalgi, Salvadgi, Menasagi, Pattadakal, Vajjala, Naravi and Talakad (Middle Palaeolithic); Kovalli, Ingaleshvara, Yadwad and Maralabhavi (Upper Palaeolithic); Begaumpur, Vanamapurahalli, Hingani, Ingaleshwara, Tamminahal, Sringeri, Jalahalli, Kibbanahalli, Sanganakal, Brahmagiri, Uppinangadi, Mani and Doddaguni (Mesolithic); Maski, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Departmnet of History I M a History Vi Semester History of Kongu Nadu Upto 1800 A.D (18Mhi24c) Dr.Seethalakshmi, Associate
    DEPARTMNET OF HISTORY I M A HISTORY VI SEMESTER HISTORY OF KONGU NADU UPTO 1800 A.D (18MHI24C) DR.SEETHALAKSHMI, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY- GAC (AUTO)- 18 Cell: 9487087335 [email protected] Unit II Western Ganga was an important ruling dynasty of ancient Karnataka in India which lasted from about 350 to 1000 CE. They are known as "Western Gangas" to distinguish them from the Eastern Gangas who in later centuries ruled over Kalinga (modern Odisha). The general belief is that the Western Gangas began their rule during a time when multiple native clans asserted their freedom due to the weakening of the Pallava empire in South India, a geo-political event sometimes attributed to the southern conquests of Samudra Gupta. The Western Ganga sovereignty lasted from about 350 to 550 CE, initially ruling from Kolar and later, moving their capital to Talakadu on the banks of the Kaveri River in modern Mysore district. After the rise of the imperial Chalukyas of Badami, the Gangas accepted Chalukya overlordship and fought for the cause of their overlords against the Pallavas of Kanchi. The Chalukyas were replaced by the Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta in 753 CE as the dominant power in the Deccan. After a century of struggle for autonomy, the Western Gangas finally accepted Rashtrakuta overlordship and successfully fought alongside them against their foes, the Chola Dynasty of Tanjavur. In the late 10th century, north of Tungabhadra river, the Rashtrakutas were replaced by the emerging Western Chalukya Empire and the Chola Dynasty saw renewed power south of the Kaveri river. The defeat of the Western Gangas by Cholas around 1000 resulted in the end of the Ganga influence over the region.
    [Show full text]