DOCSLIB.ORG

A Catalogue and Systematic Overview of the Shield-Tailed Snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Catalogue and Systematic Overview of the Shield-Tailed Snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) A catalogue and systematic overview of the shield-tailed snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) Robert Alexander PYRON Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2029 G St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20052 (United States) [email protected] Sumaithangi Rajagopalan GANESH Chennai Snake Park, Rajbhavan Post, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 022 (India) Amit SAYYED Wildlife Protection and Research Society, Satara, Maharashtra 415 001 (India) Vivek SHARMA 393 Sanjeevni Nagar, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 003 (India) Van WALLACH 4 Potter Park, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (United States) Ruchira SOMAWEERA CSIRO Land and Water, Floreat WA 6014 (Australia) Published on 30 December 2016 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFFD82EF-50C9-42BF-8493-DF57591EA4FF Pyron R. A., Ganesh S. R., Sayyed A., Sharma V., Wallach V. & Somaweera R. 2016. — A catalogue and systematic over- view of the shield-tailed snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae). Zoosystema 38 (4): 453-506. https://doi.org/10.5252/z2016n4a2 ABSTRACT We present a catalogue and systematic overview of Uropeltidae Müller, 1832 based on both new and previously published molecular and morphological data, and a new molecular phylogenetic analysis. We support the monophyly and distinctiveness of Brachyophidium Wall, 1921, Melanophidium Günther, 1864, Platyplectrurus Günther, 1868, Pseudoplectrurus Boulenger, 1890, and Teretrurus Beddome, 1886. We move Uropeltis melanogaster (Gray, 1858), U. phillipsi (Nicholls, 1929), and Pseudotyphlops Schlegel, 1839 to Rhinophis Hemprich, 1820, and re-name Pseudotyphlops philippinus (Müller, 1832) as R. saf- fragamus (Kelaart, 1853), and U. smithi Gans, 1966 as U. grandis (Beddome, 1867). Th anks to these changes, the taxonomy of all these genera is based on monophyletic entities. Diagnoses based on meristic and mensural characters for external and internal anatomy are provided for the family and all genera, and accounts are given for all currently recognized species, summarizing known morphological variation. We note several taxa that continue to be of uncertain phylogenetic affi nity, and outline necessary future studies of variation in systematically valuable characters such as rostral and tail morphology. Cryptic KEY WORDS variation is likely present in many species, and additional collection of specimens and DNA-sequence Taxonomic revision, India, data will likely be needed to provide conclusive resolution for remaining taxonomic issues. Numerous Sri Lanka, questions remain for the systematics of Uropeltidae, and we hope that this study will provide a platform phylogenetics, for ongoing research into the group, including the description of cryptic species, clarifying the phyloge- shield-tailed snakes, new synonyms, netic placement of some remaining taxa, and quantifying the range of intra- and inter-specifi c variation new combinations. in crucial morphological characters. ZOOSYSTEMA • 2016 • 38 (4) © Publications scientifi ques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.zoosystema.com 453 Pyron R. A. et al. RÉSUMÉ Catalogue et révision systématique des serpents à queue armée (Serpentes: Uropeltidae). Nous présentons un catalogue et une révision systématique des Uropeltidae Müller, 1832 basés sur des données moléculaires et morphologiques déjà publiées et nouvelles, et sur une nouvelle analyse phylogénétique moléculaire. Nous confi rmons la monophylie et la validité de Brachyophidium Wall, 1921, Melanophidium Günther, 1864, Platyplectrurus Günther, 1868, Pseudoplectrurus Boulen- ger, 1890, et Teretrurus Beddome, 1886. Nous transférons Uropeltis melanogaster (Gray, 1858), U. phillipsi (Nicholls, 1929), et Pseudotyphlops Schlegel, 1839 dans Rhinophis Hemprich, 1820 et nous renommons Pseudotyphlops philippinus (Müller, 1832) en R. saff ragamus (Kelaart, 1853) et U. smithi Gans, 1966 en U. grandis (Beddome, 1867). Grâce à ces changements, la taxonomie de tous ces genres semble basée sur des entités monophylétiques. Des diagnoses fondées sur des carac- tères méristiques et métriques de l’anatomie externe et interne sont fournies pour la famille et pour tous les genres, et des descriptions sont données pour toutes les espèces actuellement reconnues, résumant la variation morphologique connue. Nous indiquons plusieurs taxons dont les relations phylogénétiques restent incertaines et mettons en avant les études qui seront nécessaires dans le futur sur la variation de caractères signifi catifs en systématique, comme la morphologie du rostre et de la queue. Une variation cryptique est probablement présente chez de nombreuses espèces et la collecte MOTS CLÉS supplémentaire de spécimens et de données sur les séquences d’ADN sera certainement nécessaire Révision taxonomique, Inde, pour résoudre les problèmes taxonomiques restants. De nombreuses questions subsistent concernant Sri Lanka, la systématique des Uropeltidae telles que la description d’espèces cryptiques, la clarifi cation du pla- phylogénie, cement phylogénétique des quelques taxons restants, et la quantifi cation de l’extension de la variation serpents à queue armée, synonymies nouvelles, intra- et interspécifi que des caractères morphologiques déterminants. Nous espérons que ce travail combinaisons nouvelles. servira de base pour poursuivre la recherche sur ce groupe. INTRODUCTION Fitzinger (1843) had fi xed Uropeltis ceylanica Cuvier, 1829 as the type species of Uropeltis Cuvier, 1829, indicating its prior- Th e shield-tailed snakes, family Uropeltidae Müller, 1832 ity over Silybura Peters, 1861, which was in widespread use (sensu Pyron et al. 2013a), are a small group (54 species) of in the 19th century (see Beddome 1886; Boulenger 1893a). poorly studied, fossorial snakes, endemic to peninsular India However, the characters that Smith (1943) used to charac- and Sri Lanka (see Bossuyt et al. 2004). Most species were terize individual species were often subjective and potentially described in a burst of activity in the 19th century. Numerous ambiguous (e.g., general descriptions of color patterns), and junior synonyms resulted from this early period of discovery, genera such as Uropeltis give the appearance of being non- including Coloburus Duméril & Bibron, 1851; Crealia Gray, monophyletic. In particular, some species (e.g., U. melanogaster 1858; Dapatnaya Kelaart, 1853; Maudia Gray, 1858; Mitylia [Gray, 1858]; U. phillipsi [Nicholls, 1929]) have characters Gray, 1858; Morina Gray, 1858; Siluboura Gray, 1858 (later such as the rostral dividing the nasals and enlarged terminal unjustifi ably emended as Silybura Peters, 1861); and Wallia scutes on the tail, that are otherwise more common in spe- Werner, 1925 (see Gans 1966; McDiarmid et al. 1999 and cies of Rhinophis Hemprich, 1820. Smith also did not usually Wallach et al. 2014). mention or discuss type material, a convention that was not Of the 54 known, extant species, 23 were described by in wide use at the time. Colonel Richard Henry Beddome (see Wallach et al. 2014), Following the implementation of the Code, taxonomic a British offi cer in India who published extensively on South checklists were later provided by Gans (1966), McDiarmid Asian herpetofauna (Ganesh 2010). Beddome (1886) later et al. (1999), and Wallach et al. (2014), clearing up some provided an overview of the known species and numerous nomenclatural issues and consolidating lists of the type ma- subspecies. Beddome’s accounts use generic and specifi c names terial and localities, though they did not otherwise discuss (e.g., Silybura Peters, 1861; Rhinophis trevelyanus Kelaart, distributions or diagnostic characters at or above the species 1853) that are not in use today, as they were later designated level. Other research into the biology and interrelationships as junior synonyms (see McDiarmid et al. 1999). within the group has been continuous (e.g., Gans et al. 1978; Building on Beddome (1886), the last comprehensive Rajendran 1985; Gower 2003; Comeaux et al. 2010), but little systematic account of the family that included diagnostic progress in higher-level taxonomy has been made, other than characteristics and distributional data for individual species noting a general disarray in taxonomy (Gans 1966; Rieppel & was that of Malcolm Smith in 1943. Smith was a British Zaher 2002; Olori & Bell 2012). herpetologist and physician working primarily in Th ailand Molecular phylogenies have shown for at least 26 years who published a volume on the serpent fauna of British India, that the genera Pseudotyphlops Schlegel, 1839, Rhinophis, and including Sri Lanka and Burma (Smith 1943). Th is included Uropeltis are either non-monophyletic, or render other genera a key and summary descriptions of the known species, and paraphyletic (e.g., Cadle et al. 1990; Bossuyt et al. 2004; Py- established the taxonomic framework at the genus level used ron et al. 2013a, b). However, a lack of suffi cient taxonomic by most subsequent researchers. In particular, Smith noted that and character sampling precluded confi dent phylogenetic 454 ZOOSYSTEMA • 2016 • 38 (4) Systematics of Uropeltidae resolution and comprehensive taxonomic revision addressing ertheless, informed by our new data, we fi nd a compelling all species and genera in a unifi ed framework. Such a revision, need to consolidate and synthesize current knowledge of the including synonymies, lists of type material, character-based phylogeny, taxonomy, and nomenclature of the currently descriptions, observations of potential cryptic diversity, and recognized species of shield-tailed snakes. phylogenetic evidence, would be inordinately
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity and Environmental Assessment of Proposed Doubling of Railway Track Between Kulem and Castlerock in Goa-Karnataka
    Biodiversity and Environmental assessment of proposed doubling of railway track between Kulem and Castlerock in Goa-Karnataka Final report submied to Rail Vikas Nigam Limited, Ministry of Railways, Government of India Prof. R. Sukumar and Prof. T.G. Sitharam Center for Ecological Sciences Department of Civil Engineering and CISTUP Indian Instute of Science, Bangalore August 2017 Biodiversity and Environmental assessment of proposed doubling of railway track between Kulem and Castlerock in Goa-Karnataka Final report submited to Rail Vikas Nigam Limited, Ministry of Railways, Government of India Prof. R. Sukumar1 and Prof. T.G. Sitharam 2 1 Center for Ecological Sciences 2 Department of Civil Engineering and CISTUP Indian Instue of Science, Bangalore August 2017 List of Researchers Dr. H.S. Suresh, CES, IISc Dr. D.M. Bhat, CES, IISc Mr. H.S. Daaraja, CES, IISc Dr. K.G. Avinash, ANCF, CES, IISc Mr. Beependra Singh, CES, IISc Dr. K.V. Gururaj, Gubbi Labs, IISc Dr. Muk Roy, ANCF, CES, IISc Dr. H.S. Sudhira, Gubbi Labs, IISc Dr. Jagadish Chiaragi, Kuvempu University, Shivamogga Mr. Sridhar Halali, AVC College, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu Mr. Vidhyadhar Atkore, ATREE, Bangalore CONTENTS: 1. Acknowledgements . 2 2. Execuve Summary . 3 3. CHAPTER 1 Background of the Project . 9 4. CHAPTER 2 The Project area . 15 SECTION I GEO-TECHNICAL PROFILE 5. CHAPTER 3 Geo-technical Studies . 23 6. CHAPTER 4 Reconnaissance Survey . 35 7. APPENDIX I . 40 SECTION II BIO-DIVERSITY PROFILE 8. CHAPTER 5 Classificaon of landscape based on satellite data . 57 9. CHAPTER 6 Vegetaon chacteriscs of the proposed area . 63 10 CHAPTER 7 Diversity and abundance of Butterflies .
    [Show full text]
  • MAREN Gaulke Muhliusstrasse 84, 24103 Kiel 1, Germany
    Asiatic Research Vol. 6, I June 1995 Herpetolo^ical pp. WW Observations on Arboreality in a Philippine Blind Snake MAREN Gaulke Muhliusstrasse 84, 24103 Kiel 1, Germany Abstract. -Five blind snakes were observed in June 1990 in the rain forests of Sibutu Island in the Sulu Archipelago, Philippines. Contrary to the usually fossorial habits of typhlopids, Ramphotyphlops suluensis (Taylor, 1918) shows arboreal habits. It climbed through trees at night using the prehensile tail and hindbody. When caught they extruded a strong smelling liquid from their cloaca. Relatively long tails are found in some other rain forest dwelling typhlopids, which may also have arboreal habits. Key words: Reptilia, Ophidia, Typhlopidae, Ramphotyphlops suluensis, Philippines, ecology. and the relative humidity between 70 and Introduction 95%. Little is known of the behavior of blind The nomenclatural history and taxonomy snakes (Typhlopidae). Information is of the typhlopids observed and caught on normally generalized and consists of little Sibutu is discussed in Gaulke (in press), more than that typhlopids are small, where the species, previously synonymized burrowing snakes, which live in decaying with Ramphotyphlops olivaceus (Gray, logs, humus and leaf litter, and feed mainly 1845), is revalidated. Ramphotyphlops on ants and termites, especially their grubs, suluensis reaches a length of approximately pupae and eggs (e. g. Taylor, 1922; 40 cm, the eyes are distinctive, and the tail is Loveridge, 1946; Gruber, 1980). more than twice as long as broad. The dorsal side is gray, the ventral side is cream, This gap in observations is certainly due with bright white scales along the median to a number of different factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats & Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile WESTERN GHATS & SRI LANKA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT WESTERN GHATS REGION FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: Kamal S. Bawa, Arundhati Das and Jagdish Krishnaswamy (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology & the Environment - ATREE) K. Ullas Karanth, N. Samba Kumar and Madhu Rao (Wildlife Conservation Society) in collaboration with: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First K.N. Ganeshaiah, University of Agricultural Sciences Srinivas V., Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning incorporating contributions from: Narayani Barve, ATREE Sham Davande, ATREE Balanchandra Hegde, Sahyadri Wildlife and Forest Conservation Trust N.M. Ishwar, Wildlife Institute of India Zafar-ul Islam, Indian Bird Conservation Network Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Jayant Kulkarni, Envirosearch S. Lele, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment & Development M.D. Madhusudan, Nature Conservation Foundation Nandita Mahadev, University of Agricultural Sciences Kiran M.C., ATREE Prachi Mehta, Envirosearch Divya Mudappa, Nature Conservation Foundation Seema Purshothaman, ATREE Roopali Raghavan, ATREE T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation Sharmishta Sarkar, ATREE Mohammed Irfan Ullah, ATREE and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Rauf Ali Gladwin Joseph Uma Shaanker Rene Borges R. Kannan B. Siddharthan Jake Brunner Ajith Kumar C.S. Silori ii Milind Bunyan M.S.R. Murthy Mewa Singh Ravi Chellam Venkat Narayana H. Sudarshan B.A. Daniel T.S. Nayar R. Sukumar Ranjit Daniels Rohan Pethiyagoda R. Vasudeva Soubadra Devy Narendra Prasad K. Vasudevan P. Dharma Rajan M.K. Prasad Muthu Velautham P.S. Easa Asad Rahmani Arun Venkatraman Madhav Gadgil S.N. Rai Siddharth Yadav T. Ganesh Pratim Roy Santosh George P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of the Christmas Island Blind Snake, Ramphotyphlops Exocoeti (Reptilia: Squamata: Typhlopidae)
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 27 156–160 (2012) A new record of the Christmas Island Blind Snake, Ramphotyphlops exocoeti (Reptilia: Squamata: Typhlopidae). Dion J. Maple1, Rachel Barr, Michael J. Smith 1 Christmas Island National Park, Christmas Island, Western Australia, Indian Ocean, 6798, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The endemic Christmas Island Blind Snake Ramphotyphlops exocoeti is a species rarely collected since initial faunal collections were conducted on Christmas Island in 1887. Twenty-three years after the last record in 1986, an individual was collected on 31 July 2009. Here we catalogue historical collection records of this animal. We also describe the habitat and conditions in which the recent collection occurred and provide a brief morphological description of the animal including a diagnostic feature that may assist in future identifi cations. This account provides the fi rst accurate spatial record and detailed description of habitat utilised by this species. KEYWORDS: Indian Ocean, Yellow Crazy Ant, recovery plan INTRODUCTION ‘fairly common’ and could be found under the trunks Christmas Island is located in the Indian Ocean of fallen trees. In 1975 a specimen collected from (10°25'S, 105°40'E), approximately 360 km south of the Stewart Hill, located in the central west of the island western head of Java, Indonesia (Geoscience Australia in a mine lease known as Field 22, was deposited in 2011). This geographically remote, rugged and thickly the Australian Museum (Cogger and Sadlier 1981). A vegetated island is the exposed summit of a large specimen was caught by N. Dunlop in 1984 while pit mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography and Scientific Name Index to Amphibians
    lb BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SCIENTIFIC NAME INDEX TO AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON BULLETIN 1-8, 1918-1988 AND PROCEEDINGS 1-100, 1882-1987 fi pp ERNEST A. LINER Houma, Louisiana SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 92 1992 SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The SHIS series publishes and distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, but unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. Single copies are distributed free to interested individuals. Libraries, herpetological associations, and research laboratories are invited to exchange their publications with the Division of Amphibians and Reptiles. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such items please contact George Zug for instructions on preparation and submission. Contributors receive 50 free copies. Please address all requests for copies and inquiries to George Zug, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 USA. Please include a self-addressed mailing label with requests. INTRODUCTION The present alphabetical listing by author (s) covers all papers bearing on herpetology that have appeared in Volume 1-100, 1882-1987, of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington and the four numbers of the Bulletin series concerning reference to amphibians and reptiles. From Volume 1 through 82 (in part) , the articles were issued as separates with only the volume number, page numbers and year printed on each. Articles in Volume 82 (in part) through 89 were issued with volume number, article number, page numbers and year.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN and EVOLUTION of SNAKE EYES Dissertation
    CONQUERING THE COLD SHUDDER: THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF SNAKE EYES Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Christopher L. Caprette, B.S., M.S. **** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Thomas E. Hetherington, Advisor Approved by Jerry F. Downhower David L. Stetson Advisor The graduate program in Evolution, John W. Wenzel Ecology, and Organismal Biology ABSTRACT I investigated the ecological origin and diversity of snakes by examining one complex structure, the eye. First, using light and transmission electron microscopy, I contrasted the anatomy of the eyes of diurnal northern pine snakes and nocturnal brown treesnakes. While brown treesnakes have eyes of similar size for their snout-vent length as northern pine snakes, their lenses are an average of 27% larger (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.042). Based upon the differences in the size and position of the lens relative to the retina in these two species, I estimate that the image projected will be smaller and brighter for brown treesnakes. Northern pine snakes have a simplex, all-cone retina, in keeping with a primarily diurnal animal, while brown treesnake retinas have mostly rods with a few, scattered cones. I found microdroplets in the cone ellipsoids of northern pine snakes. In pine snakes, these droplets act as light guides. I also found microdroplets in brown treesnake rods, although these were less densely distributed and their function is unknown. Based upon the density of photoreceptors and neural layers in their retinas, and the predicted image size, brown treesnakes probably have the same visual acuity under nocturnal conditions that northern pine snakes experience under diurnal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspicuous Colours Reduce Predation Rates in Fossorial Uropeltid Snakes
    Conspicuous colours reduce predation rates in fossorial uropeltid snakes Vivek Philip Cyriac and Ullasa Kodandaramaiah IISER-TVM Centre for Research and Education in Ecology and Evolution and School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India ABSTRACT Uropeltid snakes (Family Uropeltidae) are non-venomous, fossorial snakes that are found above ground occasionally, during which time they are exposed to predation. Many species are brightly coloured, mostly on the ventral surface, but these colours are expected to have no function below the ground. Observations have shown that the cephalic resemblance (resemblance to heads) of uropeltid tails may direct attacks of predators towards the hardened tails, thereby potentially increasing handling times for predators. Experiments have also shown that predators learn to avoid prey that are non-toxic and palatable but are difficult to capture, hard to process or require long handling time when such prey advertise their unprofitability through conspicuous colours. We here postulate that uropeltid snakes use their bright colours to signal long handling times associated with attack deflection to the tails, thereby securing reduced predation from predators that can learn to associate colour with handling time. Captive chicken experiments with dough models mimicking uropeltids indicate that attacks were more common on the tail than on the head. Field experiments with uropeltid clay models show that the conspicuous colours of these snakes decrease predation rates compared to cryptic models, but a novel conspicuous colour did not confer such a benefit. Overall, our experiments provide support for our hypothesis that the conspicuous colours of these snakes reduce predation, possibly because these colours advertise unprofitability due to long handling times.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    HAMADRYAD Vol. 27. No. 2. August, 2003 Date of issue: 31 August, 2003 ISSN 0972-205X CONTENTS T. -M. LEONG,L.L.GRISMER &MUMPUNI. Preliminary checklists of the herpetofauna of the Anambas and Natuna Islands (South China Sea) ..................................................165–174 T.-M. LEONG & C-F. LIM. The tadpole of Rana miopus Boulenger, 1918 from Peninsular Malaysia ...............175–178 N. D. RATHNAYAKE,N.D.HERATH,K.K.HEWAMATHES &S.JAYALATH. The thermal behaviour, diurnal activity pattern and body temperature of Varanus salvator in central Sri Lanka .........................179–184 B. TRIPATHY,B.PANDAV &R.C.PANIGRAHY. Hatching success and orientation in Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) at Rushikulya Rookery, Orissa, India ......................................185–192 L. QUYET &T.ZIEGLER. First record of the Chinese crocodile lizard from outside of China: report on a population of Shinisaurus crocodilurus Ahl, 1930 from north-eastern Vietnam ..................193–199 O. S. G. PAUWELS,V.MAMONEKENE,P.DUMONT,W.R.BRANCH,M.BURGER &S.LAVOUÉ. Diet records for Crocodylus cataphractus (Reptilia: Crocodylidae) at Lake Divangui, Ogooué-Maritime Province, south-western Gabon......................................................200–204 A. M. BAUER. On the status of the name Oligodon taeniolatus (Jerdon, 1853) and its long-ignored senior synonym and secondary homonym, Oligodon taeniolatus (Daudin, 1803) ........................205–213 W. P. MCCORD,O.S.G.PAUWELS,R.BOUR,F.CHÉROT,J.IVERSON,P.C.H.PRITCHARD,K.THIRAKHUPT, W. KITIMASAK &T.BUNDHITWONGRUT. Chitra burmanica sensu Jaruthanin, 2002 (Testudines: Trionychidae): an unavailable name ............................................................214–216 V. GIRI,A.M.BAUER &N.CHATURVEDI. Notes on the distribution, natural history and variation of Hemidactylus giganteus Stoliczka, 1871 ................................................217–221 V. WALLACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Amphibians and Reptiles in Indonesia: Issues and Problems
    Copyright: © 2006 Iskandar and Erdelen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and repro- Amphibian and Reptile Conservation 4(1):60-87. duction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. DOI: 10.1514/journal.arc.0040016 (2329KB PDF) The authors are responsible for the facts presented in this article and for the opinions expressed there- in, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organisation. The authors note that important literature which could not be incorporated into the text has been published follow- ing the drafting of this article. Conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Indonesia: issues and problems DJOKO T. ISKANDAR1 * AND WALTER R. ERDELEN2 1School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 10, Jalan Ganesa, Bandung 40132 INDONESIA 2Assistant Director-General for Natural Sciences, UNESCO, 1, rue Miollis, 75732 Paris Cedex 15, FRANCE Abstract.—Indonesia is an archipelagic nation comprising some 17,000 islands of varying sizes and geologi- cal origins, as well as marked differences in composition of their floras and faunas. Indonesia is considered one of the megadiversity centers, both in terms of species numbers as well as endemism. According to the Biodiversity Action Plan for Indonesia, 16% of all amphibian and reptile species occur in Indonesia, a total of over 1,100 species. New research activities, launched in the last few years, indicate that these figures may be significantly higher than generally assumed. Indonesia is suspected to host the worldwide highest numbers of amphibian and reptiles species.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Flora of Periyar Tiger Reserv
    KFRI Research Report 150 STUDIES ON THE FLORA OF PERIYAR TIGER RESERV N. Sas idharan KERALA FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE PEECHI, THRISSUR July 1998 Pages: 558 CONTENTS Page File Index to Families r.150.2 Abstract r.150.3 1 Introduction i r.150.4 2 Study Area ii r.150.5 3 Method viii r.150.6 4 Results viii r.150.7 5 Discussion xix r.150.8 6 Families 1 r.150.9 7 References 555 r.150.10 Index to families ACANTHACEAE 290 COCHLOSPERMACEAE 16 AGAVACEAE 452 COMBRETACEAE 133 AIZOACEAE 160 COMMELINACEAE 459 ALANGIACEAE 166 CONNARACEAE 85 AMARANTHACEAE 327 CONVOLVULACEAE 262 AMARYLLIDACEAE 452 CORNACEAE 166 ANACARDIACEAE 81 CRASSULACEAE 130 ANCISTROCLADACEAE 28 CUCURBITACEAE 153 ANNONACEAE 3 CYPERACEAE 481 APIACEAE 161 DATISCACEAE 158 APOCYNACEAE 240 DICHAPETALACEAE 62 AQUIFOLIACEAE 65 DILLENIACEAE 2 ARACEAE 471 DIOSCOREACEAE 453 ARALIACEAE 164 DIPTEROCARPACEAE 27 ARECACEAE 466 DROSERACEAE 131 ARISTOLOCHIACEAE 335 EBENACEAE 229 ASCLEPIADACEAE 246 ELAEGNACEAE 354 ASTERACEAE 190 ELAEOCARPACEAE 41 BALANOPHORACEAE 361 ERICACEAE 219 BALSAMINACEAE 44 ERIOCAULACEAE 477 BEGONIACEAE 159 ERYTHROXYLACEAE 42 BIGNONIACEAE 289 EUPHORBIACEAE 361 BOMBACACEAE 34 FABACEAE (LEGUMINOSAE) 86 BORAGINACEAE 260 FLACOURTIACEAE 17 BRASSICACEAE 13 GENTIANACEAE 256 BUDDLEJACEAE 256 GESNERIACEAE 287 BURMANNIACEAE 396 HAEMODORACEAE 451 BURSERACEAE 56 HALORAGACEAE 132 BUXACEAE 361 HIPPOCRATEACEAE 69 CAMPANULACEAE 215 HYDROCHARITACEAE 396 CANNABACEAE 389 HYPERICACEAE 23 CAPPARIDACEAE 14 HYPOXIDACEAE 453 CAPRIFOLIACEAE 166 ICACINACEAE 63 CARYOPHYLLACEAE 22 JUNCACEAE 466 CELASTRACEAE
    [Show full text]
  • Journaloffthreatenedtaxa
    OPEN ACCESS All arfcles publfshed fn the Journal of Threatened Taxa are regfstered under Creafve Commons Atrfbufon 4.0 Interna - fonal Lfcense unless otherwfse menfoned. JoTT allows unrestrfcted use of arfcles fn any medfum, reproducfon and dfstrfbufon by provfdfng adequate credft to the authors and the source of publfcafon. Journal of Threatened Taxa The fnternafonal journal of conservafon and taxonomy www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Prfnt) Short Communfcatfon Small carnfvores of Parambfkulam Tfger Reserve, southern Western Ghats, Indfa R. Sreeharf & P.O. Nameer 26 September 2016 | Vol. 8 | No. 11 | Pp. 9306–9315 10.11609/ jot. 2311 .8.1 1.9306 -9315 For Focus, Scope, Afms, Polfcfes and Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/About_JoTT.asp For Arfcle Submfssfon Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/Submfssfon_Gufdelfnes.asp For Polfcfes agafnst Scfenffc Mfsconduct vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/JoTT_Polfcy_agafnst_Scfenffc_Mfsconduct.asp For reprfnts contact <[email protected]> Publfsher/Host Partner Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2016 | 8(11): 9306–9315 Small carnivores of Parambikulam Tiger Reserve, southern Western Ghats, India ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) 1 2 Short Communication Short R. Sreehari & P.O. Nameer ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 1,2 Centre for Wildlife Sciences, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680656, India OPEN ACCESS 1 Current address: Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: The first ever detailed study on the small carnivores of the (Mustelidae) and small cats (Felidae). They are mostly Parambikulam Tiger Reserve (PkTR) in the southern Western Ghats, nocturnal and solitary animals and also one of the less using camera trap techniques, reported 11 species.
    [Show full text]