DOCSLIB.ORG

IRQ0581687 Attachment 1 About The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IRQ0581687 Attachment 1 About The Count of Count Column Labels Row Labels 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Grand Total Association of Chief Police Officers 1 1 1 5 8 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 1 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 4 5 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Avon & Somerset Police Authority 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 1 Avon and Somerset Constabulary 5 3 8 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 1 3 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 2 1 3 Avon and Somerset Police & Crime Commissioner 1 3 4 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 DC action required 1 1 No action for DC 2 2 Bedfordshire Police 7 7 2 8 7 31 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 2 2 7 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 4 2 6 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 2 2 4 Closed - insufficient information provided 3 3 6 Compliance advice given to DC 1 1 Concern to be raised with DC 1 1 DC action required 1 1 No action for DC 2 2 Not DPA 2 2 Bedfordshire Police Authority 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 1 British Transport Police 8 1 2 4 6 21 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 4 4 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 2 3 Closed - insufficient information provided 2 1 2 5 Concern to be raised with DC 3 3 DC action required 1 1 No action for DC 2 2 British Transport Police Authority 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 British Transport Police Professional Standards 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Brixton Police 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Cambridgeshire Constabulary 3 4 1 1 3 12 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 1 4 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 3 1 4 No action for DC 3 3 Cambridgeshire Police Force 1 1 2 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 2 Central Scotland Joint Police Board 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Central Scotland Police 1 4 3 8 Closed - assessment criteria not met 3 3 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 3 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 2 cheshire Constabulary 6 1 7 Closed - advice given 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 2 2 Cheshire Constabulary HQ 2 1 3 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Cheshire Police Authority 4 1 4 1 10 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 1 2 5 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 1 3 Chief Constable Avon & Somerset Constabulary 10 5 11 26 Closed - Compliance Likely 4 2 6 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 2 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 2 2 Closed - insufficient information provided 4 1 5 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 2 2 No action for DC 5 5 Not DPA 2 2 Chief Constable Bedfordshire Constabulary 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Chief Constable Cheshire Constabulary 3 3 6 2 13 27 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 2 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 2 2 1 7 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 3 3 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Compliance advice given to DC 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 3 3 DC action required 2 2 No action for DC 2 2 Not DPA 2 2 Response needed from DC 2 2 Chief Constable Cleveland Police 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 Chief Constable Derbyshire Constabulary 1 1 4 1 5 12 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 3 4 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 1 3 Compliance advice given to DC 1 1 Concern to be raised with DC 1 1 No action for DC 2 2 Not DPA 1 1 Chief Constable Devon & Cornwall Constabulary 7 9 1 8 25 Closed - advice given 1 2 3 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 3 4 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 1 4 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 3 1 5 Compliance advice given to DC 1 1 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 No action for DC 5 5 Chief Constable Essex Police 8 11 7 12 9 47 Closed - assessment criteria not met 2 1 3 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 2 2 1 8 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 3 2 4 9 Closed - insufficient information provided 2 7 3 6 18 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 3 3 No action for DC 4 4 Chief Constable Greater Manchester Police 12 8 14 15 28 77 Closed - advice given 3 3 Closed - assessment criteria not met 2 2 4 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 3 4 1 9 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 3 3 7 14 Closed - insufficient information provided 6 2 5 5 18 Compliance advice given to DC 1 1 Concern to be raised with DC 5 5 DC action required 8 8 General advice given to DC 1 1 No action for DC 9 9 Not DPA 2 2 Response needed from DC 2 2 Chief Constable Hertfordshire Constabulary 2 6 7 3 11 29 Closed - advice given 1 1 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 2 1 5 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 4 4 Closed - insufficient information provided 3 1 1 5 Compliance advice given to DC 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 4 4 DC action required 2 2 No action for DC 1 1 Not DPA 1 1 Response needed from DC 1 1 Chief Constable Humberside Police 7 4 5 4 8 28 Closed - advice given 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 5 1 1 7 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 3 5 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 2 2 5 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 1 1 General advice given to DC 1 1 No action for DC 3 3 Not DPA 1 1 Chief Constable Kent Police 6 4 3 4 10 27 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 3 2 6 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 3 3 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 2 1 3 Closed - insufficient information provided 2 1 1 4 Compliance advice given to DC 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 3 3 DC action required 1 1 No action for DC 3 3 Response needed from DC 1 1 Chief Constable Lancashire Constabulary 14 11 6 12 14 57 Closed - advice given 2 1 1 4 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 1 3 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 3 1 5 12 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 4 2 6 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 2 1 1 3 7 Closed - insufficient information provided 3 3 2 3 11 Compliance advice given to DC 1 1 Concern to be raised with DC 8 8 DC action required 4 4 No action for DC 1 1 Chief Constable Lancashire Police 3 3 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Chief Constable Leicestershire Constabulary 6 2 1 3 6 18 Closed - advice given 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 3 2 1 2 8 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 3 3 Not DPA 1 1 Chief Constable Lincolnshire Police 1 2 1 10 14 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 1 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Compliance advice given to DC 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 3 3 No action for DC 1 1 Not DPA 1 1 Response needed from DC 1 1 Chief Constable Martin Baker Dorset Police 2 1 7 10 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Concern to be raised with DC 3 3 DC action required 1 1 No action for DC 3 3 Chief Constable Merseyside Police 10 3 5 6 12 36 Closed - advice given 2 2 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 1 1 3 7 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 3 3 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - insufficient information provided 3 1 4 1 9 Compliance advice given to DC 2 2 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 2 2 No action for DC 4 4 Not DPA 1 1 Response needed from DC 1 1 Chief Constable Norfolk Constabulary 5 3 2 3 8 21 Closed - advice given 2 2 Closed - assessment criteria not met 1 1 Closed - Compliance Likely 2 1 2 5 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - insufficient information provided 3 3 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 2 2 No action for DC 3 3 Not DPA 1 1 Chief Constable North Wales Police 6 3 10 2 6 27 Closed - Compliance Likely 4 1 7 12 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 2 2 1 6 Concern to be raised with DC 2 2 DC action required 1 1 No action for DC 1 1 Not DPA 2 2 Chief Constable Northern Constabulary 3 2 5 Closed - compliance unlikely, no remedial action taken 1 1 2 Closed - compliance unlikely, remedial action taken 2 2 Closed - insufficient information provided 1 1 Chief Constable Northumbria Police 9 14 18 8 11 60 Closed - advice given 2 1 3 Closed - assessment criteria
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, Hth June 1987 B23
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, HTH JUNE 1987 B23 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Am FORCE DEPARTMENT) Malcolm Robert POPPERWELL, Assistant Chief Constable, Avon and Somerset Constabulary. Squadron Leader Philip Desmond DYE (5201059), Ronald William RUMSBY, Chief Superintendent, Royal Air Force. Suffolk Constabulary. Wing Commander Richard Skene PEACOCK- Colin Roderick SMITH, C.V.O., Chief Constable, EDWARDS (5200226), Royal Air Force. Thames Valley Police. Squadron Leader George William PIXTON Richard Burton WELLS, Deputy Assistant (8018671), Royal Air Force. Commissioner, Metropolitan Police. NORTHERN IRELAND MINISTRY OF DEFENCE George Campbell JACKSON, Chief Superintendent, WHITEHALL, LONDON, S.W.I. Royal Ulster Constabulary. 13th June 1987 William McGREEGHAN, Sergeant, Royal Ulster Constabulary. THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of the Air Force Medal to the HONG KONG undermentioned: Frederick Samual McCOSH, C.P.M., Assistant MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY DEPARTMENT) Commissioner, Royal Hong Kong Police Force. Donald McFarlane WATSON, C.P.M., Assistant Air Force Medal Commissioner, Royal Hong Kong Police Force. A.F.M. 24114776 Staff Sergeant Francis WALKER, Army Air Corps. SCOTTISH OFFICE NEW ST ANDREW'S HOUSE, EDINBURGH 13th June 1987 THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the HOME OFFICE occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, QUEEN ANNE'S GATE, LONDON s.w.i to approve the award of The Queen's Police Medal for 13th June 1987 Distinguished Service to the undermentioned: THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the Queen's Police Medal occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of The Queen's Police Medal for Q.P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Test: an Evaluation of the Police Standard Entrance Test. INSTITUTION Scottish Council for Research in Education
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 249 TM 027 914 AUTHOR Wilson, Valerie; Glissov, Peter; Somekh, Bridget TITLE Examining the Test: An Evaluation of the Police Standard Entrance Test. INSTITUTION Scottish Council for Research in Education. SPONS AGENCY Scottish Office Education and Industry Dept., Edinburgh. ISBN ISBN-0-7480-5554-1 ISSN ISSN-0950-2254 PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 104p. AVAILABLE FROM HMSO Bookshop, 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh, EH3 9AZ; Scotland, United Kingdom (5 British pounds). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Employment Qualifications; Foreign Countries; Job Skills; Minority Groups; *Occupational Tests; *Police; Test Bias; *Test Interpretation; Test Use; *Testing Problems IDENTIFIERS *Scotland ABSTRACT In June 1995, the Scottish Council for Research in Education began a 5-month study of the Standard Entrance Examination (SET) to the police in Scotland. The first phase was an analysis of existing recruitment and selection statistics from the eight Scottish police forces. Phase Two was a study of two police forces using a case study methodology: Identified issues were then circulated using the Delphi approach to all eight forces. There was a consensus that both society and the police are changing, and that disparate functional maps of a police officer's job have been developed. It was generally recognized that recruitment and selection are important, but time-consuming, aspects of police activity. Wide variations were found in practices across the eight forces, including the use of differential pass marks for the SET. Independent assessors have identified anomalies in the test indicating that it is both ambiguous and outdated in part, with differences in the readability of different versions that compromises comparability.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report
    Scottish Institute for Policing Research Annual Report 2013 Cover picture © Police Scotland © Scottish Institute for Policing Research, April 2014 2 The Scottish Institute for Policing Research A 60 Second Briefing The Scottish Institute for Policing Research (SIPR) is a strategic collaboration between 12 of Scotland’s universities1 and the Scottish police service supported by investment from Police Scotland, the Scottish Funding Council and the participating universities. Our key aims are: • To undertake high quality, independent, and relevant research; • To support knowledge exchange between researchers and practitioners and improve the research evidence base for policing policy and practice; • To expand and develop the research capacity in Scotland’s universities and the police service; • To promote the development of national and international links with researcher, practitioner and policy communities. We are an interdisciplinary Institute which brings together researchers from the social sciences, natural sciences and humanities around three broad thematic areas: Police-Community Relations; Evidence & Investigation; and Police Organization; We promote a collaborative approach to research that involves academics and practitioners working together in the creation, sharing and application of knowledge about policing; Our activities are coordinated by an Executive Committee comprising academic researchers and chief police officers, and we are accountable to a Board of Governance which includes the Principals of the participating universities
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 128/2006 Christine Grahame MSP And
    Decision 128/2006 Christine Grahame MSP and the Chief Constables of Central Scotland Police, Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary, Grampian Police, Lothian and Borders Police, Northern Constabulary, Strathclyde Police and Tayside Police Special Branch files containing the title “Scottish National Party” Applicant: Christine Grahame MSP Authorities: Chief Constables of Central Scotland Police, Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary, Grampian Police, Lothian and Borders Police, Northern Constabulary, Strathclyde Police and Tayside Police Case Nos: 200503159, 200502890, 200503161, 200502930, 200502939, 200600069, 200502892 Decision Date: 27 June 2006 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews Fife KY16 9DS Decision 128/2006 Christine Grahame MSP and the Chief Constables of Central Scotland Police, Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary, Grampian Police, Lothian and Borders Police, Northern Constabulary, Strathclyde Police and Tayside Police Request for number of files held by Special Branch containing the title “Scottish National Party” and the period covered – notice under section 18 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 issued (contrary to public interest to reveal whether information exists or is held) Facts Ms Grahame requested from the chief constables of seven Scottish police forces (referred to collectively in this decision as “the Police”) the number of files held by Special Branch containing the title “Scottish National Party” and the period the files relate to. The Police refused to confirm whether they held any of the information requested, or whether that information existed, in terms of section 18 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA). That decision was upheld on review and Ms Grahame applied to the Scottish Information Commissioner for a decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 041/2008 Mr William Scott and the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police
    Decision 041/2008 Mr William Scott and the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police Photographs taken in the gymnasium of Dunblane Primary School Applicant: Mr William Scott Authority: Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police Case No: 200800131 Decision Date: 18 March 2008 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews Fife KY16 9DS Decision 041/2008 Mr William Scott and the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police Photographs taken in the gymnasium of Dunblane Primary School - withheld on the basis of section 39(1) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 – health and safety – Commissioner upheld decision to withhold information Relevant Statutory Provisions and Other Sources Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA): sections 1(1) (general entitlement); 2(1) (Effect of exemptions) and 39(1) (Health, safety and the environment) The full text of each of these provisions is reproduced in the Appendix to this decision. The Appendix forms part of this decision. Decision 034/2007 - The Sportsman's Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/ApplicationsandDecisions/Decisions/2007/20050 3197.asp. Facts Mr William Scott (Mr Scott) requested photographs taken in the gymnasium of Dunblane Primary School following the shootings at the school on 13 March 1996 from the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police (Central Scotland Police). Central Scotland Police responded by stating that the information requested was exempt in terms of section 39(1) of FOISA since disclosure would, or would be likely to, endanger the physical or mental health or the safety of individuals and that the public interest was in favour of withholding the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Scotland Police and Central Scotland Joint Police Board Best Value Audit and Inspection
    Central Scotland Police and Central Scotland Joint Police Board Best Value Audit and Inspection Prepared for the Accounts Commission and Scottish ministers July 2012 The Accounts Commission The Accounts Commission is a statutory, independent body which, through the audit process, requests local authorities in Scotland to achieve the highest standards of financial stewardship and the economic, efficient and effective use of their resources. The Commission has four main responsibilities: • securing the external audit, including the audit of Best Value and Community Planning • following up issues of concern identified through the audit, to ensure satisfactory resolutions • carrying out national performance studies to improve economy, efficiency and effectiveness in local government • issuing an annual direction to local authorities which sets out the range of performance information they are required to publish. The Commission secures the audit of 32 councils and 45 joint boards and committees (including police and fire and rescue services). Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary for Scotland HMICS operates independently of police forces, police authorities and the Scottish Government and exists to monitor and improve the police service in Scotland. HMICS does this on behalf of the Scottish public by: • monitoring, through self-assessment and inspection, how effectively the police service in Scotland is fulfilling its purpose and managing risk • supporting improvement by identifying good practice, making recommendations and sharing our findings in order to achieve better outcomes for Scotland’s communities • providing advice to Scottish ministers, police authority and joint board members and police forces and services. Even though HMICS is independent of the Scottish Government, ministers can call upon the Inspectorate to undertake particular pieces of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Fife Partnership Resource Pack Please Contact Fife Partnership Manager Telephone: 01592 418860 E-Mail: [email protected]
    FFIIFFEE PPAARRTTNNEERRSSHHIIPP RREESSOOUURRCCEE PPAACCKK MMAAYY 22000077 1 RReessoouurrccee PPaacckk Contents Page 1. Introduction and Background to Community Planning 3 • Purpose of this pack 3 • What is community planning? 3 • Community Plan aims and themes 3 • What do we mean by partnership? 6 2. Effective Partnership Working 7 • Why work in partnership? 7 • What helps to make partnership working successful? 9 • The partnership life cycle and helpful hints 10 • What can you bring to a partnership? 12 • How effective is your partnership? 13 3. Who's Who? 14 • Introduction 14 • Key strategic partnerships 15 • Other partnerships 29 • Aims and remit • Connections to other partnerships/groups • Membership • Contacts • Sub-Group diagram 4. Further Resources 50 • General information, Partnership Working, Health and 50 Wellbeing, Well Educated and Skilled Fife, Safer Communities, Stronger Communities, Flexible and Diverse Economy, Safeguarding and Improving our Environment, Improving Services, 5. Appendices 55 i) Performance management framework - how we measure 55 progress. ii) Contacts for Funding 57 2 1. Introduction and Background to Community Planning Purpose of this Pack This resource pack provides an overview of community planning, partnership working and partnership structures in Fife. Its main aim is to help with the induction of new members of community planning partnerships, but it should be of interest to anyone with an interest in finding out more about community planning in Fife and partnership working in general. The pack is available on www.fifedirect.org.uk under the section on Community Planning. What is Community Planning? Community planning is the means by which Fife’s public and voluntary organisations work together and with our communities to improve services and the quality of life in Fife.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 125/2010 Richard Borrer and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Fees Paid to Named Legal Advisors for Work in Re
    Decision 125/2010 Richard Borrer and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Fees paid to named legal advisors for work in relation to specified actions Reference No: 201000233 Decision Date: 14 July 2010 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews KY16 9DS Tel: 01334 464610 Decision 125/2010 Richard Borrer and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Summary In two separate information requests, Mr Richard Borrer requested from the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary (Fife Constabulary) information on the professional fees and expenses paid to named legal advisors for specified work. Fife Constabulary advised Mr Borrer that it did not hold this information. Following reviews of each request, Mr Borrer remained dissatisfied and applied to the Commissioner for a decision. Following an investigation, the Commissioner found that Fife Constabulary had dealt with Mr Borrer's requests for information partly in accordance with Part 1 of FOISA. In respect of the first request and the first part of the second request, the Commissioner found that, by issuing a notice in terms of section 17 of FOISA stating that it did not hold the information requested, Fife Constabulary had complied with FOISA. However, in respect of the second part of the second request, the Commissioner found that Fife Constabulary failed to comply with section 17(1) of FOISA, because, although it did not hold this information, it did not clearly provide notice that it was not held. Since this decision makes the position on this point clear, the Commissioner does not require Fife Constabulary to take any action in response to this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Police, Prison & Court Personnel Charged Or Convicted Of
    List of Police, Prison & Court Personnel charged or convicted of an offence 2009 to 2021 – V40 16/03/2021 - (Discard all previous versions) Please only share this original version. Consent is not given to edit or change this document in any way. - [email protected] © Date Name Police Force Offence Result Source 16th March 2021 PC Wayne Couzens Metropolitan Police Charged with murder Proceeding Source: 15th March 2021 Sgt Ben Lister West Yorkshire Police Charged with rape Proceeding Source: 9th March 2021 PC Jonathan Finch Hampshire Police Gross Misconduct (sexual exposure) Sacked Source: 2nd March 2021 PC Olivia Lucas Hampshire Police Gross Misconduct (Lying) Resigned Source: 22nd Feb 2021 PC Tasia Stephens South Wales Police Drink Driving Banned for 15 months Source: 17th Feb 2021 Ursula Collins Metropolitan Police Charged - 8 counts of misconduct Proceeding Source: 15th Feb 2021 PO Paul Albertsen HMP Salford Theft from prisons Jailedfor 15 months Source: 15th Feb 2021 PO Paul Hewitt HMP Salford Theft from prisons Jailed for 15 months Source: 10th Feb 2021 PC Andrew Sollars Hampshire Police Sexual assault Three months suspended Source: 2nd Feb 2021 PC Alan Friday Cheshire Police Harassment Two year community order Source: 5th Jan 2021 PC Stuart Clarke Nottinghamshire Police Gross Misconduct Resigned Source: 17th Dec 2020 DC Darryl Hart Leicestershire Police Gross Misconduct Final Written Warning Source: 7th Dec 2020 Sgt Rob Adams Sussex Police Gross Misconduct Final Written Warning Source: 2nd Dec 2020 PC William Sampson South
    [Show full text]
  • Antisocial Behaviour Strategy the Highland Council and Northern Constabulary 2011
    Antisocial Behaviour Strategy The Highland Council and Northern Constabulary 2011 - 2016 Page 1 01/09/2011 SECTION CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction 3 2. Highland Approach 5 3. Services/Implementation 10 4. Key Priorities 16 5. Monitoring & Evaluation 17 Appendix 1 25 Local Recommendations 18 Appendix 2 Defining and referring issues 26 of antisocial behaviour Page 2 01/09/2011 1. Introduction 1.1.1 The Highlands are widely recognised as being a safe place to live, work and visit. The Highland Council, Northern Constabulary and other partner agencies, seek to strengthen and enhance this reputation by dealing effectively with community safety issues including antisocial behaviour. 1.1.2 The Highland Council and Northern Constabulary take antisocial behaviour very seriously and the aim of this strategy is to ensure that Highland’s residents are able to have quiet enjoyment of their homes and communities, without being harassed or subject to nuisance caused by those around them. 1.1.3 The strategy has been prepared jointly by the Highland Council and Northern Constabulary to inform the public, stakeholders and partners about the agreed direction. It provides detail about the approach, priorities and partners’ commitments. 1.1.4 It takes account of the wider community safety agenda and commitment to deliver positive outcomes set out in the Highland Single Outcome Agreement and the multi agency coordinated approach in response to incidents of antisocial behaviour in the Highlands. 1.2 Community Safety Community Safety is about protecting people’s rights to live in confidence and without fear of their or other people’s safety; ensuring that people are safe from crime, disorder, danger and free from injury and harm; enabling communities to be socially cohesive, tolerant, and resilient and have strong networks that support individuals to take responsibility for their wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Inquiry Into the Shootings at Dunblane Primary School on 13 March 1996
    The Public Inquiry into the Shootings at Dunblane Primary School on 13 March 1996 The Hon Lord Cullen The Public Inquiry into the Shootings at Dunblane Primary School on 13 March 1996 ISBN 0 10 133862 7 Cm. 3386 Contents Title Page Foreword List of Victims Chapter 1 Summary of the Report Chapter 2 The scope and conduct of the Inquiry Chapter 3 The events of 13 March 1996 Chapter 4 Events in the life of Thomas Hamilton Chapter 5 The last six months Chapter 6 Thomas Hamilton's possession of firearms and ammunition Chapter 7 The control of firearms and ammunition Chapter 8 The certification system relating to section 1 firearms Chapter 9 The availability of section 1 firearms Chapter 10 School security Chapter 11 The vetting and supervision of adults working with children and young people Chapter 12 Summary of recommendations Appendix 1 List of the parties and their representatives Appendix 2 List of witnesses Appendix 3 Discussion relating to decisions taken by Procurators Fiscal Appendix 4 List of submissions Appendix 5 Publications taken into consideration Appendix 6 Target shooting competitions for handguns Foreword The Rt Hon Michael Forsyth MP Secretary of State for Scotland Dear Secretary of State On 21 March 1996 it was resolved by both Houses of Parliament that it was "expedient that a Tribunal be established for inquiring into a definite matter of urgent public importance, that is to say, the incident at Dunblane Primary School on Wednesday 13 March 1996, which resulted in the deaths of 18 people." In terms of the Warrant of Appointment dated 21 March 1996, you appointed me to be a Tribunal for the purposes of this Inquiry in virtue of Section 1 of the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921; and you declared that that Act should apply to the Tribunal and that the Tribunal was constituted as a Tribunal within the meaning of Section 1 of that Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Annual Report
    SCOTTISH INSTITUTE FOR POLICING RESEARCH Annual Report 2008 © Scottish Institute for Policing Research, January 2009 i Contents Foreword iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Management and Governance 1 3 Capacity Building 2 4 Research Initiatives 7 5 Knowledge Exchange 10 6 Financial summary and sustainability 14 7 Concluding comments 15 Appendices Appendix 1 Management and Governance structure 16 Appendix 2 Remit and membership of the SIPR / Force Liaison Group 17 Appendix 3 Network Strategic Plans 2008/2009 18 Appendix 4 Research Publications and Conference Presentations 2008 23 Appendix 5 Affiliations of attendees at SIPR events, 2008 34 Appendix 6 Programme for the Second SIPR Annual Conference and 36 Annual Lecture Appendix 7 Programme of Network Seminars and Full Day Events 2008 39 SIPR Committee Membership Executive Committee 44 Advisory Committee 44 Network Steering Group 45 SIPR Appointments as at 31 December 2008 Director and Associate Directors 46 Research & KT Manager 46 Lecturers 46 Post-Doctoral Research Assistants 46 PhD Students 46 ii Foreword “This type of event is a wonderful opportunity for both sides to engage so as to not only produce more meaningful and worthwhile research but to ensure good practice gleaned through such research filters back to the operational side of policing. I will certainly encourage others to attend.” (Police practitioner) ‘I’ve found that there is a strong appetite for research in the police now, and that is no doubt largely due to SIPR and the links and structure it provides’ (Academic researcher) The partnership between Scottish universities and the Scottish police service embodied by SIPR is now two years old and over this time significant progress has been made in terms of new collaborative research projects, a vibrant programme of knowledge exchange activities and a rapid expansion in research capacity.
    [Show full text]