Fife Council EMBARGOED UNTIL 00.01 HOURS THURSDAY 12 MARCH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fife Council EMBARGOED UNTIL 00.01 HOURS THURSDAY 12 MARCH The Audit of Best Value and Community Planning Fife Council EMBARGOED UNTIL 00.01 HOURS THURSDAY 12 MARCH Prepared for the Accounts Commission March 2009 The Accounts Commission The Accounts Commission is a statutory, independent body which, through the audit process, assists local authorities in Scotland to achieve the highest standards of financial stewardship and the economic, efficient and effective use of their resources. The Commission has four main responsibilities: • securing the external audit, including the audit of Best Value and Community Planning • following up issues of concern identified through the audit, to ensure satisfactory resolutions • carrying out national performance studies to improve economy, efficiency and effectiveness in local government • issuing an annual direction to local authorities which sets out the range of performance information they are required to publish. The Commission secures the audit of 32 councils and 41 joint boards (including police and fire and rescue services). Local authorities spend over £19 billion of public funds a year. Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April 2000 under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000. It provides services to the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission. Together they ensure that the Scottish Government and public sector bodies in Scotland are held to account for the proper, efficient and effective use of public funds. Fife Council Contents The Audit of Best Value Efficiencies Page 2 Procurement Commission findings Page 24 Page 4 Continuous improvement Overall conclusions Page 25 Page 6 Equal opportunities Part 1. Does the council have clear Page 26 strategic direction? Page 9 Sustainable development Page 27 Context Page 10 Part 3. How are services performing? Page 29 Leadership and culture Page 11 Statutory performance indicators Setting a clear direction Customer focus Page 14 Page 30 Engaging with the community Education Page 16 Page 31 Part 2. Is the council organised to Social work deliver better services? Page 32 Page 18 Local community and housing Working in partnership Page 33 Page 19 Environment and development Managing performance Page 34 Scrutiny Part 4. What needs to improve? Page 21 Page 36 Managing resources Fife Council improvement agenda Page 22 Page 37 The Audit of Best Value The Audit of Best Value This report is made by the Controller As Best Value and Community of Audit to the Accounts Commission Planning encompass all the activities under section 0() of the Local of a council it is not realistic to audit Government (Scotland) Act 97. After everything in depth, so we plan our considering it the Commission may detailed work in two ways: do any or all of the following: • Where possible, we draw on • direct the Controller to carry out the findings of other scrutiny further investigations processes, such as the work carried out by the council’s external • hold a hearing auditors and by inspectorates. These are incorporated into • state its findings. our report. The Local Government in Scotland Act • We select certain aspects of 00 introduced new statutory duties the council’s performance for relating to Best Value and Community detailed audit investigation. A wide Planning. The scope of Best Value and range of sources, including the Community Planning is very broad council’s own assessment of its but in general terms a successful performance, reports issued by council will: external audit and inspections, and national Statutory Performance • work with its partners to identify a Indicators (SPIs), informs this clear set of priorities that respond selection. to the needs of the community in both the short and the longer term • The report reflects this selective approach, with detailed • be organised to deliver those commentary on some areas and priorities limited or no coverage in others. While we have made some • meet and clearly demonstrate comparisons with other councils, that it is meeting the community’s our overall approach has focused needs on performance trends and improvement within Fife Council. • operate in a way that drives The report also reflects the picture continuous improvement in all its available at the time our main audit activities. work was conducted between July and September 008. The challenge for local government is to find new ways of working across We gratefully acknowledge the services and with other bodies to co-operation and assistance provided achieve the best results for citizens to the audit team by Fife Council, and service users. The key objectives particularly the councillors and officers of this audit were to: contacted during the audit. We would like to particularly thank Councillor • assess the extent to which Fife Peter Grant, the leader of the council; Council is meeting its duties under Ronnie Hinds, the chief executive; and the Local Government in Scotland Peter Corbett, Niki Ross and Fiona Act 00 Moffat (Strategy and Review Team). • agree planned improvements with the council. These will be reviewed by the council’s external auditor over the next three years. Commission findings Commission findings 1. The Commission accepts this 3. For the future, we consider it report on the performance of Fife essential that effective performance Council’s statutory duty to secure information is in place to underpin Best Value and to initiate and facilitate improvements in service delivery. the community planning process. Elected members should take more The Commission recognises that of a leadership role in driving forward the report gives a broad picture of the best value agenda at a strategic the council’s performance based on level and should participate fully in the work of Audit Scotland and the training and development. There is findings of other scrutiny bodies such room for improvement in respect of as Inspectorates and that it does not workforce planning and a need for attempt a comprehensive review of improved monitoring of the outcomes all service delivery. We acknowledge of partnership working. We would also the co-operation and assistance given encourage the council to develop the to the audit process by members and working of its area committees and to officers of the council. make progress with shared services. 2. We are pleased to note that the 4. Fife is a unitary police authority council has a clear strategic direction and fire and rescue authority, one of and shows good self awareness, only two such councils and this is with many of the building blocks in therefore the first time that we have place for achieving best value. We looked at police and fire as part of welcome the recent increase in the a Best Value audit. We found a lack pace of change and the evidence of clarity around the roles of elected of recent significant improvements members in relation to these services in statutory performance indicators and the council should review and we note, in particular, the good how it discharges its best value performance of the education service responsibilities with regard to police and the improvements in social work. and fire and rescue services. We would urge the leadership of the council, both officers and elected 5. We look forward to receiving from members, to maintain the momentum the council an improvement plan with towards further improvement. measurable and achievable outcomes to address the issues highlighted in the Controller of Audit’s report and these findings. Overall conclusions Overall conclusions 7 Fife Council has a clear strategic 2. The council’s leadership provide in Fife. Monitoring of outcomes has direction. The council’s leadership clear direction and communicates been limited and the council as lead has set out its vision and priorities their priorities effectively. There is partner needs to ensure that plans and communicated these constructive cross-party working. Over are implemented and performance effectively. The council is ambitious half the council is made up of newly monitored more effectively. and has recently put the building elected members and, while they blocks of best value in place. It have a good awareness of what is 6. Fife Council is a unitary authority shows good self-awareness of what required, all elected members would for police and fire and rescue is required and it is developing a benefit from better use of learning services. Elected members are not culture of continuous improvement. and development activities. Elected fulfilling the range of their best value The pace of change has increased members need to play a more active responsibilities for these services. and the council needs to maintain role in driving improvement and The current arrangements do not this momentum if it is to achieve implementing the best value agenda provide adequate time for discussion its priority of becoming a ‘top at a strategic level. of strategic issues and there is a performing council’. lack of clarity about the respective 3. The council’s vision complements roles of members in relation to the Elected members have not been that of the Community Planning chief constable. The council needs sufficiently active in leading Partnership (CPP). It is supported to review how it discharges its best improvement and implementing by the ‘Big 8’ priorities, which are value responsibilities in relation to the the best value agenda at a strategic recognised and supported by elected police and fire and rescue authorities. level. The council needs to review members and officers. The corporate how it discharges its best value planning framework focuses on 7. Fife Council has in place the responsibilities in relation to the vision and priorities but there is key elements of a performance the police and fire and rescue scope to integrate the work of area management framework. Further authorities. committees more effectively. The development of the framework council is ambitious and shows good and significant improvements to The council works closely with its self-awareness of what is required performance reporting is required to partners and community planning through its corporate improvement enhance the scrutiny of performance.
Recommended publications
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, Hth June 1987 B23
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, HTH JUNE 1987 B23 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Am FORCE DEPARTMENT) Malcolm Robert POPPERWELL, Assistant Chief Constable, Avon and Somerset Constabulary. Squadron Leader Philip Desmond DYE (5201059), Ronald William RUMSBY, Chief Superintendent, Royal Air Force. Suffolk Constabulary. Wing Commander Richard Skene PEACOCK- Colin Roderick SMITH, C.V.O., Chief Constable, EDWARDS (5200226), Royal Air Force. Thames Valley Police. Squadron Leader George William PIXTON Richard Burton WELLS, Deputy Assistant (8018671), Royal Air Force. Commissioner, Metropolitan Police. NORTHERN IRELAND MINISTRY OF DEFENCE George Campbell JACKSON, Chief Superintendent, WHITEHALL, LONDON, S.W.I. Royal Ulster Constabulary. 13th June 1987 William McGREEGHAN, Sergeant, Royal Ulster Constabulary. THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of the Air Force Medal to the HONG KONG undermentioned: Frederick Samual McCOSH, C.P.M., Assistant MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY DEPARTMENT) Commissioner, Royal Hong Kong Police Force. Donald McFarlane WATSON, C.P.M., Assistant Air Force Medal Commissioner, Royal Hong Kong Police Force. A.F.M. 24114776 Staff Sergeant Francis WALKER, Army Air Corps. SCOTTISH OFFICE NEW ST ANDREW'S HOUSE, EDINBURGH 13th June 1987 THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the HOME OFFICE occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, QUEEN ANNE'S GATE, LONDON s.w.i to approve the award of The Queen's Police Medal for 13th June 1987 Distinguished Service to the undermentioned: THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the Queen's Police Medal occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of The Queen's Police Medal for Q.P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report
    Scottish Institute for Policing Research Annual Report 2013 Cover picture © Police Scotland © Scottish Institute for Policing Research, April 2014 2 The Scottish Institute for Policing Research A 60 Second Briefing The Scottish Institute for Policing Research (SIPR) is a strategic collaboration between 12 of Scotland’s universities1 and the Scottish police service supported by investment from Police Scotland, the Scottish Funding Council and the participating universities. Our key aims are: • To undertake high quality, independent, and relevant research; • To support knowledge exchange between researchers and practitioners and improve the research evidence base for policing policy and practice; • To expand and develop the research capacity in Scotland’s universities and the police service; • To promote the development of national and international links with researcher, practitioner and policy communities. We are an interdisciplinary Institute which brings together researchers from the social sciences, natural sciences and humanities around three broad thematic areas: Police-Community Relations; Evidence & Investigation; and Police Organization; We promote a collaborative approach to research that involves academics and practitioners working together in the creation, sharing and application of knowledge about policing; Our activities are coordinated by an Executive Committee comprising academic researchers and chief police officers, and we are accountable to a Board of Governance which includes the Principals of the participating universities
    [Show full text]
  • Fife Partnership Resource Pack Please Contact Fife Partnership Manager Telephone: 01592 418860 E-Mail: [email protected]
    FFIIFFEE PPAARRTTNNEERRSSHHIIPP RREESSOOUURRCCEE PPAACCKK MMAAYY 22000077 1 RReessoouurrccee PPaacckk Contents Page 1. Introduction and Background to Community Planning 3 • Purpose of this pack 3 • What is community planning? 3 • Community Plan aims and themes 3 • What do we mean by partnership? 6 2. Effective Partnership Working 7 • Why work in partnership? 7 • What helps to make partnership working successful? 9 • The partnership life cycle and helpful hints 10 • What can you bring to a partnership? 12 • How effective is your partnership? 13 3. Who's Who? 14 • Introduction 14 • Key strategic partnerships 15 • Other partnerships 29 • Aims and remit • Connections to other partnerships/groups • Membership • Contacts • Sub-Group diagram 4. Further Resources 50 • General information, Partnership Working, Health and 50 Wellbeing, Well Educated and Skilled Fife, Safer Communities, Stronger Communities, Flexible and Diverse Economy, Safeguarding and Improving our Environment, Improving Services, 5. Appendices 55 i) Performance management framework - how we measure 55 progress. ii) Contacts for Funding 57 2 1. Introduction and Background to Community Planning Purpose of this Pack This resource pack provides an overview of community planning, partnership working and partnership structures in Fife. Its main aim is to help with the induction of new members of community planning partnerships, but it should be of interest to anyone with an interest in finding out more about community planning in Fife and partnership working in general. The pack is available on www.fifedirect.org.uk under the section on Community Planning. What is Community Planning? Community planning is the means by which Fife’s public and voluntary organisations work together and with our communities to improve services and the quality of life in Fife.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 125/2010 Richard Borrer and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Fees Paid to Named Legal Advisors for Work in Re
    Decision 125/2010 Richard Borrer and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Fees paid to named legal advisors for work in relation to specified actions Reference No: 201000233 Decision Date: 14 July 2010 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews KY16 9DS Tel: 01334 464610 Decision 125/2010 Richard Borrer and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Summary In two separate information requests, Mr Richard Borrer requested from the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary (Fife Constabulary) information on the professional fees and expenses paid to named legal advisors for specified work. Fife Constabulary advised Mr Borrer that it did not hold this information. Following reviews of each request, Mr Borrer remained dissatisfied and applied to the Commissioner for a decision. Following an investigation, the Commissioner found that Fife Constabulary had dealt with Mr Borrer's requests for information partly in accordance with Part 1 of FOISA. In respect of the first request and the first part of the second request, the Commissioner found that, by issuing a notice in terms of section 17 of FOISA stating that it did not hold the information requested, Fife Constabulary had complied with FOISA. However, in respect of the second part of the second request, the Commissioner found that Fife Constabulary failed to comply with section 17(1) of FOISA, because, although it did not hold this information, it did not clearly provide notice that it was not held. Since this decision makes the position on this point clear, the Commissioner does not require Fife Constabulary to take any action in response to this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Fingerprint Whorld
    FINGERPRINT WHORLD The International Journal of Quaerite et Invenietis Vol. 36 No. 141 The Fingerprint Society October 2010 Founded 1974 © Copyright 2010 ISSN 0951-1288 The Fingerprint Society online http://www.fpsociety.org.uk 36817_Oct2010.indd 1 27/10/2010 13:20 Fingerprint Whorld is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that reflects the aims of the , It is devoted to the theory and practice of fingerprint identification science and its associated disciplines. To assist the aims, recognises that its membership is international and multi-disciplinary and as such sees a need for both new and review articles across a spectrum of forensic science evidence gathering topics to assist in the continual professional development of all stages of the profession. 36817_Oct2010.indd 2 27/10/2010 13:20 CONTENTS October 2010 Vol. 36 No 141 NEW CHAIRPERSON Introducing the new Society 148 Chairperson Bob Doak RESEARCH I Fluorescent Small Particle Reagent. Part I: 150 A novel composition for detecting latent fingerprints on wet non-porous items G.S. Sodhi and Jasjeet Kaurb RESEARCH II Fluorescent small particle reagent 154 G.S. Sodhi; Jasjeet Kaur ARTICLE Derbyshire Facial Identification Unit 159 Beverley Hunt SOCIETY AWARDS 163 BENEFITS Wiley Books & Bond Solon 169 CONFERENCE The Annual Society Conference 2011 171 SOCIETY NEWS Vacancies, Proposals, Committee meetings Article submission dates, One day seminar Book review, Contacts 173 ARTICLE Facial Recognition: Sagem 177 PRACTITIONER A Cautionary Tale 184 Bob Doak 36817_Oct2010.indd 3 27/10/2010 13:20 To advance the study and application of fingerprints and to facilitate the cooperation Quaerite et invenietis among persons interested in this field of personal identification.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2013 Issue No 47
    BURGH BUZZ Published by Burntisland Community Council Also available on line at www.burghbuzz.org.uk May 2013 Issue No 47 Spring The Slowing Heartbeat he High Street is the heart of any town. Its pulse spreads out through the surrounding streets giving the Contents T whole community vibrancy and life, and any town with a busy High Street is a vital and successful community. Given this, any threat to the well-being of this, should be a cause for alarm for the residents it serves. Section Pages Unfortunately there has been a recent threat to the lifeblood of Burntisland High Street that seems to be largely slipping under the radar. Editorial 2 There has been a planning proposal for a not insignificant group of retail units at the top of Community Council Kirkton Road that poses a threat the community Bullets 2 seem to be largely unaware of. While more diversity and competition in the town would be Police report & welcome, do we really want this to have a detrimental effect on our High Street? We are Councillors info 3 lucky enough to enjoy one of the better served High Streets in our area and do we want to lose School News 4, 5 our soup bags from the friendly local fruit shop, our personal service from our local butcher, our A H o r n e r freshly baked goods from our bakers, our fresh A busy High Street Remembers 6 fish from our fish shop, our local post office that is much more, our bargain toiletries and household essentials, our wool and crafts, our fair trade goods, our The “Juck” 7 cafes, our spiritual necessities, our books and most of all the friendly and personal service that comes with all of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints Recording Audit Central Scotland Police
    Complaints recording audit Central Scotland Police November 2011 Dumfries & Galloway Constabulary Fife Constabulary Grampian Police Lothian & Borders Police Northern Constabulary Strathclyde Police Tayside Police Central Scotland Police Contents Summary and key findings page 1 Summary of recommendations page 1 Commissioner’s role page 2 Introduction and scope page 2 Background page 3 Methodology page 3‐4 Findings and recommendations page 4‐6 Conclusion page 6 Summary and key findings Three Complaint About the Police cases were identified from the period audited 2010 – 11 as not having been recorded. This represents 0.6 % (3/510) of the total sample size examined and as such is the non – recording rate of complaints about the police in respect of Central Scotland Police. Reflecting the audit findings an overall assurance level has been applied to the initial recording of complaints about the police by Central Scotland Police as follows: Substantial Assurance This is because the initial recording of complaints about the police was considered to be generally robust, supported by sophisticated procedures for the handling of correspondence and well trained staff. However, the lack of a formal audit process to ensure consistency in recording practices is viewed as a weakness. The recommendations made provide an opportunity for the force to enhance confidence in their overall recording practices. Assurance level Definition Sound system of control designed to achieve the system FULL objectives. Essentially a sound system but with weaknesses that put SUBSTANTIAL some system objectives at risk. Weaknesses in the system of controls put system LIMITED objectives at risk. Control is weak leaving the system open to significant NIL error or abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report for Fife Sports and Leisure Trust Ltd
    FSLT: Measuring the real value of Sport and Physical Activity in Fife Final Report for Fife Sports and Leisure Trust Ltd: Measuring the real value of Sport and Physical Activity in Fife December 2012 Prepared by: Axiom Consultancy (Scotland) Ltd 38 Queen Street Glasgow G1 3DX 0141 548 8079 [email protected] www.axiomconsultancy.co.uk _________________________________________________________________________________ FSLT: Measuring the real value of Sport and Physical Activity in Fife Contents Page Section 1: Introduction and methodology 1 Section 2: Profile of FSLT 4 Section 3: Profiling FSLT service users 6 Section 4: Quantifying economic impact 11 Section 5: Impact on partnership working 14 Section 6: Estimating the social return on investment of FSLT’s Health & 18 Wellbeing programmes Section 7: Conclusions and recommendations 21 Appendices: Appendix 1: Profile of FSLT Appendix 2: Economic impact tables Appendix 3: Social impact tables Appendix 4: Partnership programmes Appendix 5: List of local suppliers _________________________________________________________________________________ FSLT: Measuring the real value of Sport and Physical Activity in Fife Section 1: Introduction and methodology Background Fife Sports and Leisure Trust Ltd (FSLT) assumed responsibility for the management and operation of sport and leisure facilities on behalf of Fife Council in 2008. It provides sports and leisure services under the terms of a service agreement with Fife Council which requires FSLT to deliver on three strategic priorities: Widening the level of participation in sport and active recreation Developing opportunities and pathways for people to take up and fulfill their potential in sport Provide good quality, adequately resourced facilities and services which meet the needs and aspirations of Fife residents and visitors to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring News:SBCC Spring Newsletter
    SPRING NEWSLETTER April 2011 Welcome to our Spring Newsletter The latest period has development of the initiative in INSIDE continued to see further Scotland. development of our work at THIS the Scottish Business Crime It is unfortunate that the Fire Centre and I am delighted and Rescue Service have that we have secured our decided not to continue with EDITION funding from the Scottish the secondment of a Fire Government for the year Officer to the Centre. Richard 2011/12. Norman’s contribution has been valuable and I thank him Foreword 1 for his support and hard work Members Hugh Brown of The In March we held the first ever in his time with us and wish Edrington Group and Chair of Economic Crime Program National Award Ceremony for him well for the future. Distribution Industry Best Bar None in Scotland. Best Bar None Awards 2 Partnership Scotland, who will This most successful event I am delighted that work deliver the closing speech and SCCG Conference was held in the Apex Hotel in progresses toward the hosting Ken Milliken of KPMG who will Dundee and was attended by Taxi Safety Scheme 3 of the 2nd Scottish present to delegates on the over 250 representatives of Safer Retail Awards - Commercial Crime Group Bribery and Corruption Act. bars and clubs in Scotland. Fife & West Lothian Conference at the end of May. This promises to be a most We were delighted to The work of this group informative event. Falkirk’s Safe Zone 4 welcome Kenny MacAskill, continues to expand under Justice Secretary, John DIPS - Beware the Fuel Thieves the leadership of Detective On behalf of the team at the Letford, the Lord Provost of Superintendent Willie Semple SBCC I would like to thank all Secured by Design 5 Dundee, and Angela Wilson, and several influential of our partners for their Assistant Chief Constable, Safer Parking speakers have been secured continuous support of our Tayside Police.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Emergency Plan
    MAJOR EMERGENCY PLAN Fife Council Major Emergency Plan FOREWORD The public are exposed daily to emergencies that are routinely dealt with by the emergency services or other organisations. Serious or major emergencies, greater in scale and effect, occur less frequently but can involve threats and risks from many sources including natural phenomena and man made accidents as well as malicious acts and international terrorism. Experience has shown that to deal successfully with unforeseen disruptive events, resources beyond those normally available are required and that the best response is achieved when organisations that provide key public services work in partnership with the communities affected. The Government has recognised the need for improved protection of the public by introducing the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 which establishes a clear set of roles and responsibilities for those involved in emergency preparation and response at the local level. As a designated Category 1 Responder Fife Council is required to develop increased public resilience to deal with disruptive events as well as providing support to the emergency services. In the event of a major emergency in Fife e.g. a Lockerbie type incident, it is conceivable that every local authority service could be involved to some extent in the overall response. The Fife Council Major Emergency Plan has therefore been produced after full consultation with all council services, the emergency services and partner organisations, both statutory and voluntary, who in time of crisis may be asked to respond to bring the emergency to a satisfactory conclusion and thereafter to ensure the return to normality as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilley Award 2005 Application Form the Following Form Must Be
    Tilley Award 2005 Application form The following form must be competed in full. Failure to do so will result in disqualification from the competition. Please send competed application forms to Tricia Perkins at [email protected] All entries must be received by noon on the 29 April 2005. Entries received after that date will not be accepted under any circumstances. Any queries on the application process should be directed to Tricia Perkins on 0207 035 0262. 1. Details of application Title of the project: Operation Rush Name of force/agency/CDRP: Fife Constabulary Name of one contact person with position/rank (this should be one of the authors): PC 281 Claire Watson Email address: [email protected] Full postal address: Fife Constabulary Station St. Brycedale Avenue Kirkcaldy Fife KY1 1EU Telephone number: 01592 418700 Fax number: 01592 641134 Name of endorsing senior representatives(s): Tom Ewing Position and rank of endorsing senior representatives(s): Superintendent Full address of endorsing senior representatives(s): Community Team Fife Constabulary Station St. Brycedale Avenue Kirkcaldy Fife KY1 1EU 1 2. Summary of application In no more that 400 words please use this space to describe your project. Include details of the problem that was addressed a description of the initiative, the main intervention principles and what they were designed to achieve, the main outcomes of project particularly in relation to the problem, evidence was used in designing the programme and how the project is evaluated. Kirkcaldy, Fife has a population of around 300,000 people. The Esplanade, Kirkcaldy forms a 1½ mile stretch of four-lane carriageway.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for the Public on the Role of the Police Complaints Commissioner
    Your complaint at a glance Relevant Police Bodies STEP 1 Contact the police organisation concerned Scottish police forces and complete their complaints process. • Central Scotland Police STEP 2 If you remain unhappy contact the Commissioner • Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary to request a review of your complaint. • Fife Constabulary STEP 3 If the Commissioner decides to carry out a • Grampian Police review, he will ask the police body you are complaining • Lothian and Borders Police about for all the information it has about what has • Northern Constabulary happened so far. • Strathclyde Police STEP 4 The Commissioner will examine the facts of the • Tayside Police case, looking at all the information provided by you and the police organisation. He will review the evidence on Scottish police authorities and boards which the police conclusions were based and come to • Central Scotland Joint Police Board a view on whether the conclusions were reasonable. A guide for the public • Dumfries & Galloway Police and Fire and Rescue Authority STEP 5 The Commissioner will write to you and the • Fife Police, Fire and Safety Committee on the role of the Police police body involved to let you know his decision. His • Grampian Joint Police Board report, known as Complaint Handling Review, will usually Complaints Commissioner be published, fully anonymised, on the PCCS website • Lothian & Borders Joint Police Board www.pcc-scotland.org. • Northern Joint Police Board for Scotland • Strathclyde Police Authority The Complaint Handling Review will outline: • Tayside Joint Police Board • the complaint Scottish police bodies • the background to the complaint • Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency • what the police body did to deal with the complaint • Scottish Police Services Authority • the Commissioner’s consideration of the way the police UK police bodies operating in Scotland body handled the complaint • British Transport Police and British Transport • the Commissioner’s conclusions and, where Police Authority appropriate, any recommendations to the police body.
    [Show full text]