DOCSLIB.ORG

25 MPH Speed Limits on Residential Streets BACKGROUND

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
25 MPH Speed Limits on Residential Streets BACKGROUND CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY A-23 AGENDA DATE 516108 SUBJECT: 25 MPH speed limits on residential streets BACKGROUND: In response to citizen concerns of traffic and pedestrian safety, increases in pedestrian traffic and increased use of our trails and traillink(s) which have put more people walking on our roads, the Public Safety Committee discussed and recommends to council that the speed on residential streets be reduced from 30M PH to 25MH. Numerous public notices were given in the newsletter, and at Council meetings and citizen input was solicited and received. Numerous citizen comments in favor were received at Council and one comment not in favor was received by the Chief of Police. RECOMMENDATION: Reduce the speed limits on residential streets from 30MPH to 25MPH Funding Source: A total of 14 signs are needed at $50.00 each total of $700.00 (both replacement for speed limits are needed - we can use the existing posts) Public works director and Chief of Police met and decided that the funding should come from the PW street fund Requesting Department: Police Dept For More Information Contact: PSC Chairman, John Moore Prior Council Action: none Committee Public Safety Committee recommends approval ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON OAKDALE DRIVE, YELLOWTAIL COVE, LOVEGRASS LANE, CURLEY MESQUITE COVE, SUNSET TRAIL, REESE ROAD, PILLOW ROAD, AND LONE OAK TRAIL IN THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO ERECT SIGNS POSTING SUCH NEW SPEED LIMIT, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR A VIOLATION, REQUIRING PUBLICATION OF A CAPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE, MAKING FINDINGS AND A DETERMINATION IN SUPPORT OF SUCH SPEED LIMITS, ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERANCE WHERAS, the existing speed limit for vehicles traveling on the locations of the residential streets listed and defined in Section 1 ofthis Ordinance is 30 miles per hour; WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the existing speed limit on each of the Residential Streets (hereinafter used as that term is defmed in Section 1 of this Ordinance) is unreasonable and unsafe, in view of the width of such streets, the close proximity of residences to such streets, lighting conditions on such streets, and the rural character ofdevelopment on such streets; WHEREAS, each ofthe Residential Streets is located in an "urban district" as that term is defined in Texas Transportation Code § 541.102; WHEREAS, each ofthe Residential Streets is less than 35 feet wide, has three or fewer lanes used for vehicular travel, and parking is not prohibited on either side ofany ofsuch streets; WHEREAS, the City council is authorized, pursuant to Texas. Transportation Code § 545.356 to establish a speed limit of25 miles per hour based on the findings provided in this Ordinance WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reduce the speed limit for vehicular traffic on each ofthe Residential Streets to a safe speed of25 miles per hour; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY: Section 1. The locations on the streets in the City ofSunset Valley listed in this Section 1 are defmed, for purposes ofthis Ordinance, as the Residential Streets. a. Oakdale Drive, from the intersection ofOakdale Drive and Brodie Lane to the easterly dead end ofOakdale Drive adjacent to the property located at 800 Oakdale Drive; b. Yellowtail Cove from its intersection with Lovegrass Lane to its dead end adjacent to the property located at 29 Yellow Tail Cove; c. Lovegrass Lane from its intersection with Brodie Lane to its intersection with Yellowtail Cove; d. Curly Mesquite Cove from its intersection with Lovegrass Lane to its dead end adjacent to the property located at 5 Curley Mesquite Cove; e. Sunset Trail from its intersection with Jones Road to its intersection with Reese Drive; f. Reese Drive from its intersection with Jones Road to its southerly dead end adjacent to the property located at 32 Reese Drive; g. Pillow Road from its intersection with Jones Road to its southerly dead end adjacent to the property located at 50 Pillow Road h. Lone Oak Trail from its intersection with Jones Road to its southerly dead end adjacent to the property located at 42 Lone Oak Trail. Section 2. The maximum speed limit for any motor vehicle traveling on any ofthe Residential Streets shall be 25 miles per hour. Section 3. The Public Works Department ofthe City shall erect signs, in compliance with applicable regulations for traffic signage, on each ofthe Residential Streets. Such signs shall be erected in a manner as to give notice to drivers ofmotor vehicles ofthe speed limit established by this Ordinance. Section 4. A person who violates the speed limit established by this Ordinance on a Residential Street shall be guilty ofa Class C misdemeanor. A violation ofthe speed limit established by this Ordinance is punishable by a fine ofup to $500.00. Section 5. A caption that summarizes the purpose ofthis Ordinance and the penalty for violating this ordinance shall be published as provided by Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 52.011. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon adoption. However, no speed limit established by this Ordinance shall be enforced on any Residential Street until: (i) a sign has been erected on such Residential Street in compliance with Section 3 ofthis Ordinance; and (ii) publication has occurred in compliance with Section 5 ofthis Ordinance. Section 7. The factual recitations, findings and determination included in the recitals of this Ordinance are specifically made and determined by the City Council in the adoption ofthis Ordinance. Section 8. Ifany provision ofthis Ordinance is found by a court ofcompetent jurisdiction to be void or unenforceable, such void or unenforceable provision shall be severed as though it never formed a part ofthis Ordinance, and all other provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUNSET VALLEY, TEXAS, on the __day of , 2008. Cat Quintanilla, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Spec Sheet
    IQ1500 Variable Speed Limit Sign White Violator Strobes Variation The IQ Series of Radar Speed Signs offers solutions forraising drivers’ attentions and improving road safety. The bright 15” characters can be seen from up to 750’ away, and help increase driver speed awareness on the roadways where crashes can be so dangerous. SafetyCalm data collection software allows you to gather data of traffic patterns and program the sign to help keep roads safer. Key Features: Part #: M75-15VSL-U0W1 • Modular design for quick, easy installation and service • Full Matrix, amber LEDs with 15” high digits. “SLOW DOWN” or “TOO FAST” messages activate to provide speed sensitive violator warning without being distracting. Why TraffiCalm™? • All iQ Series signs include SafetyCalm Software, a Full Featured Configuration, Scheduling and Data Software Suite. ISO 9001:2015 Certified • USA based facility • Emoticon Display options to grab driver’s attention • Engineered with intelligent power features. Power-Miser mode activates All signs 100% MUTCD • automatically to preserve functionality even with low power input. compliant • Solar or 110V AC ready (power packages sold separately) Vandal resistant • • K-band (24.15GHz) radar, range 450 feet. designs • Unlimited tech support and customer service from our USA facility for the life Broadest range of • of the sign sizes and options in the industry • Fast delivery- typically ships within 2 weeks of order • Made in America. Certificate of Compliance available upon request Industry leading • turnaround from • 3 year limited warranty order to delivery Unlimited tech sup- Package Includes: • port and customer Variable speed limit sign, mounting bracket, SafetyCalm™ Configuration and service from our USA Traffic Data Collection Software, installation and user manual.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Drivers Manual: Ch. 7
    CHAPTER 7 | Safe Vehicle Operation CHAPTER SEVEN | SAFE VEHICLE OPERATION Even the most experienced drivers can be distracted while driving. A defensive driver looks out for the actions of other drivers and anticipates potential problems. LANE MARKINGS Lane markings separate traffic and alert drivers when it is permissible to pass other vehicles. Yellow Lane Markings Yellow lane markings separate multiple lanes of traffic going in opposite directions. You may cross a broken yellow line to pass another vehicle when it is safe, but you should not cross a solid yellow line except to turn. Two-lane road with a solid yellow line Two-lane road with a broken Four-lane road with a solid yellow line yellow line White Lane Markings White lane markings separate multiple lanes of traffic going in the same direction. Most roads with more than two lanes have broken white lines to separate the lanes. You may cross a broken white line when it is safe to change lanes, but you should not cross a solid white line. Three lanes of traffic with broken white lines CHANGING LANES AND PASSING OTHER VEHICLES Change only one lane at a time. When changing lanes to prepare for a turn, you must signal your intention to do so at least 200 feet prior to changing lanes or turning. Your signal distance must be at least 300 feet before the turn if you are operating a vehicle in a speed zone of at least 50 miles per hour. Do not weave in and out of lanes, which will greatly increase your risk of an accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers License Manual
    6973_Cover 9/5/07 8:15 AM Page 2 LITTERING: ARKANSAS ORGAN & TISSUE DONOR INFORMATION Following the successful completion of driver testing, Arkansas license applicants will IT’S AGAINST THE LAW. be asked whether they wish to register as an organ or tissue donor. The words “Organ With a driver license comes the responsibility of being familiar with Donor” will be printed on the front of the Arkansas driver license for those individuals the laws of the road. As a driver you are accountable for what may be who choose to participate as a registered organ donor. thrown from the vehicle onto a city street or state highway. Arkansas driver license holders, identified as organ donors, will be listed in a state 8-6-404 PENALTIES registry. The donor driver license and registry assist emergency services and medical (a)(1)(A)(i) A person convicted of a violation of § 8-6-406 or § 8-6-407 for a first offense personnel identify the individuals who have chosen to offer upon death, their body’s shall be guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and shall be fined in an amount of not organs to help another person have a second chance at life (i.e. the transplant of heart, less than one hundred dollars ($100) and not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). kidneys, liver, lungs, pancreas, corneas, bone, skin, heart valves or tissue). (ii) An additional sentence of not more than eight (8) hours of community service shall be imposed under this subdivision (a)(1)(A). It will be important, should you choose to participate in the donor program to speak (B)(i) A person convicted of a violation of § 8-6-406 or § 8-6- court shall have his or her driver's license suspended for six with your family about the decision so that your wishes can be carried-out upon your 407 for a second or subsequent offense within three (3) years (6) months by the Department of Finance and Administration, death.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Edition ”W
    wzl-u-DE WlO-lZP-DE 4. 75" ENTERING THE CORPORATE Sponsor LIMITS OF :5; ’FOREAECLEANVEREDELAWARE II N EWA R K ::: SPONSORWAFWHIGHWAY . :: r‘1I |""_ I ’I'IHJI’ I "'IT ~ 20182018 EDITIONEDITION ”W R“. PIG ,i , _ 1 I,I I;, 7, BEGIN LETFT“: SPEED,"—T—W N I“ i DDelawareelaware SStanaaratandard HHighwayighway iNo TURNS : OFFICIAL SSignsigns :USE‘ONLY E NAME ForFor useuse withwith the 20182013 DEDE MUTCDMUTCD , :2 N0 1: STOPPING :2 STANDING '1 0R i: PARKING IIIIHIQII: Welcome to a]. vIIAII IIIIIIIM I ‘ImII‘IIn I I 7' ‘ II Delaware f; mun * I - [HAND HELD ‘ [::: . ‘ IIIIIIII 'InI W I n J I I Wm" yawn I I ' I | _ I \Inw ' TIHmmE rfl"!h!g:5=*‘éSZafiaséihkvwaW25' I ‘ E ' 110M W)” _.I I222; 22: III I II.III III IE“ R4-4-DE u :::I (J I § '1 : 4- Westfield f IJ‘ _ REIDMSIGNAL "n’..-. I A . I: I ‘ '------ ‘ I I’ _R|GHTWI\IJRNS . I AHEAD, v.1'-I ‘ Wh.lsperlnq. VAIIEEE jI O , ‘izla IWHENMfLASHHNG 2 \I Ln IA \\//)IL: ‘ "-Iv-[IiL-I'IIIIII‘I‘HIII yam I k m II‘II“‘>I IIIIN II. I MINI IIIINII II ‘I IuIIIn-IIIIII 'vII I 7- I In'- I‘ ”II II IIII‘I‘I IN IN >IwIl I-l ll‘.‘l I " “J 5—5-1 IE“? ‘ "v-"ra-rég'I ”I In IIv -IIIII awn" 5“ I ‘II‘ III IIIIM _ . ;.I -, III.» II .II-I ,, .- I. I . j , ' .' ‘ I I II I I If [H‘JIJJIIL‘IL I TEIE‘EYZ‘III‘UjJ E ' ‘ ‘ ' II NI “III I IIIIIIII’II’IIIIII I I I-I-JIHIII HI Htl IkI-I'IIH I I III: IIIII III IMMIIIIIII I- I4 II‘ II-I-NI IIII-I-II- II- I f-Y':I"."-II'.NI"_’:f LEGIEIIE 5'=[EI: --.-.I-nE IF‘EIZ‘UT-‘EREIY E‘ .NIFwIIhJ FE..I I“II~“~‘II..II III Preface This book presents detailed drawings of 98 Delaware specific signs outlined in the Delaware Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (DE MUTCD) 2018 Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Limits in Work Zones Guidelines October 2014 Table of Contents
    Speed Limits in Work Zones Guidelines October 2014 Published by: Office of Traffic, Safety & Technology Office of Construction & Innovative Contracting SPEED LIMITS IN WORK ZONES GUIDELINES OCTOBER 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY CHART ................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 2 THE LAW ............................................................................................... 3 DOCUMENTATION ................................................................................. 4 ADVISORY SPEEDS ............................................................................. 5 WORKERS PRESENT SPEED LIMITS ................................................. 6 24/7 CONSTRUCTION SPEED LIMITS .................................................. 8 HIGHER FINES FOR INPLACE SPEED LIMITS IN WORK ZONES ....... 9 SPEED LIMITS ON DETOURS .............................................................. 10 DYNAMIC SPEED DISPLAY SIGNS ..................................................... 11 EXTRAORDINARY LAW ENFORCEMENT .......................................... 12 APPENDIX: Sample Extraordinary Law Enforcement Request ............................ 15 Sample Workers Present Speed Limit Documentation Form ........... 16 Layouts 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4 ................................................................. 17 Dynamic Speed Display Sign Drawing ............................................... 23 The information contained
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Physician's Guide to Driver Medical Evaluation
    THE NORTH CAROLINA PHYSICIAN'S GUIDE TO DRIVER MEDICAL EVALUATION Second Edition Medical Review Branch Driver License Section Division of Motor Vehicles North Carolina Department of Transportation July 2004 THE NORTH CAROLINA PHYSICIAN'S GUIDE TO DRIVER MEDICAL EVALUATION, Second Edition TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface to the Second Edition………………………………………………..…………………..………4 PART I. THE DRIVER MEDICAL EVALUATION PROGRAM Purpose of the Guide.......................................................................................................................5 Traffic Safety...................................................................................................................................5 Prevention of Disabilities.................................................................................................................6 History of the Program....................................................................................................................6 Identification of Impaired Drivers ...................................................................................................7 Physician Referrals ..........................................................................................................................7 Evaluation Procedure .......................................................................................................................7 Appeals............................................................................................................................................8 The
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrians Speed Limits
    Pedestrians Each year for the last five years, there were more than 600 pedestrian fatalities and more than 7,000 pedestrian injuries in Florida. Here are some things to consider to help you reduce your chances of being involved in a car/pedestrian crash. The major crash types most often associated with pedestrians are: • Mid-block dart-outs • Multiple-lane crossing • Intersection dash • Vehicle turn/merge • Vendor/Ice cream truck and backup How to avoid car/pedestrian mishaps • Walk defensively—Be prepared for the unexpected. Don't let cars surprise you even if a motorist does something wrong like running a stop sign or making an unsignaled or sudden turn. • Walk facing oncoming traffic—when there are no sidewalks, walk near the curb or off the road if necessary. • Cross streets at intersections whenever possible—Look in all directions before entering the street. Be especially alert to vehicles that may be turning right on a red signal. If there are crosswalks, use them but don't assume that you are completely safe in a crosswalk. Don't cross at mid-block because "jaywalking" is dangerous and against the law. • At intersections, look for the signs or signals—They will help to cross safely. Use the push buttons for crossing protection at signalized intersections that have pedestrian indications. The lighted "Walk" and "Don't Walk" signals are meant for the pedestrian. If the "Don't Walk" light is blinking while you are in the street, continue quickly and carefully. If there are no pedestrian signals, watch the traffic signals. When there are only Stop or Yield signs, look in all directions and cross when traffic has cleared.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 56/Thursday, March 22, 2018/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 56 / Thursday, March 22, 2018 / Notices 12643 medical history or clinical diagnosis of Leon A. Stannard V. Viewing Comments and Documents epilepsy or any other condition which Mr. Stannard, 70, has a history of a To view comments, as well as any is likely to cause loss of consciousness documents mentioned in this preamble, or any loss of ability to control a CMV.’’ single unprovoked seizure and has been seizure free since 1980. He takes anti- go to http://www.regulations.gov and in Since the January 15, 2013 notice, the the search box insert the docket number Agency has published additional seizure medication, with the dosage and frequency remaining the same since FMCSA–2018–0050 and click ‘‘Search.’’ notices granting requests from Next, click ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ and individuals for exemptions from the 1998. His physician states that he is supportive of Mr. Stannard receiving an you will find all documents and regulatory requirement regarding comments related to this notice. epilepsy found in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8). exemption. William P. Swick Issued on: March 16, 2018. To be considered for an exemption Larry W. Minor, from the epilepsy and seizure disorders Mr. Swick, 63, has a history of a Associate Administrator for Policy. prohibition in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8), seizure disorder and has been seizure applicants must meet the criteria in the [FR Doc. 2018–05861 Filed 3–21–18; 8:45 am] free since 2005. He takes anti-seizure BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 2007 recommendations of the Agency’s medication, with the dosage and Medical Expert Panel (MEP) (78 FR frequency remaining the same since 3069).
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Guidelines for Medically At-Risk Drivers
    Oklahoma Guidelines for Medically at-risk Drivers This information package regarding the State guidelines for medically at-risk drivers in Oklahoma has been compiled for DriveABLE™ client use only, using the sources indicated below * . Physician / medical reporting Physicians are permitted to report to the Department of Public Safety any patient whom they have reasonable cause to believe is incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle. Immunity Any physician reporting in good faith and without malicious intent shall have immunity Legal Protection By statute the physician has full immunity. Link to licensing authorities’ website homepage www.dps.state.ok.us More detailed information is available in the following pages; feel free to contact us if you have a question, you will find our contact information at www.driveABLE.com * Sources ‐ Lococo K, Staplin L. Strategies for Medical Advisory Boards and Licensing Review. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2005. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/MedicalAdvisory/pages/contents.html ‐ Wang CC, Kosinski CJ, Schwartzberg JG, Shanklin AV. Physician’s Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2003. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/433/chapter8.pdf Any information in this document is made available for informational purposes only; DriveABLE™ has made reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, but regulations and state guidelines may have changed.
    [Show full text]
  • NYS Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
    New York State Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (2009 Edition) Effective March 16, 2011 New York State Department of Transportation NYS Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD Page 2 of 269 This page intentionally left blank. December 2010 Effective March 16, 2011 NYS Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD Page 3 of 269 NEW YORK STATE SUPPLEMENT TO THE NATIONAL MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS – 2009 EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS NYS SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION PART 1 GENERAL Chapter 1A. General Section 1A.03 Design of Traffic Control Devices Section 1A.07 Responsibility for Traffic Control Devices Section 1A.08 Authority for Placement of Traffic Control Devices Section 1A.13 Definitions of Headings, Words, and Phrases in this Manual PART 2 SIGNS Chapter 2A. General Section 2A.03 Standardization of Application Section 2A.06 Design of Signs Section 2A.11 Dimensions Section 2A.15 Enhanced Conspicuity for Standard Signs Section 2A.16 Standardization of Location Chapter 2B. Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Section 2B.02 Design of Regulatory Signs Section 2B.03 Size of Regulatory Signs Section 2B.05 STOP Sign (R1-1) and ALL Way Plaque (R1-3P) Section 2B.06 STOP Sign Applications Section 2B.09 YIELD Sign Applications Section 2B.10 STOP Sign or YIELD Sign Placement Section 2B.11 Yield Here To Pedestrians Signs and Stop Here For Pedestrians Signs (R1-5 Series) Section 2B.12 In-Street and Overhead Pedestrian Crossing Signs ((R1-6,
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Management Program Plan
    Speed Management Program Plan Mission of the United States Department of Transportation: Serve the United States by ensuring a fast, safe, efficient, accessible, and convenient transportation system that meets our vital national interests and enhances the quality of life of the American people today and into the future. SPEED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN INITIATIVE UPDATE This document is an update of the Speed Management Strategic Initiative (retitled Speed Management Program Plan), originally published in 20051 and was developed jointly by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Highway Administration , and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to address speeding as a contributor to highway crashes and fatalities. The strategies contained in this initiative incorporate recommendations of the Transportation Research Board contained in Special Report 254, Managing Speed: Review of Current Practice for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits and parallel elements from Volume 23, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 500: A Guide for Reducing Speeding- Related Crashes. 1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Highway Administration , & Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. (2005, September). Speed management strategic initiative. (Report No. DOT HS 809 924). Washington, DC: Authors. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GOAL The goal of this Speed Management Program Plan is to improve public health and safety by reducing speeding-related fatalities and injuries. OUTCOMES 1. Reduction in speeding-related
    [Show full text]
  • Epilepsy and Driving Frederick Andermann, G.M
    LE JOURNAL CANADIEN DES SCIENCES NEUROLOGIQUES SPF.riAI.RF.PORT Epilepsy and Driving Frederick Andermann, G.M. Remillard, Benjamin G. Zifkin, Antonio G. Trottier and Patrice Drouin Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1988; 15:371-377 INTRODUCTION Even with the strictest standards and regular medical follow- (Frederick Andermann) up, traffic accidents may still be caused by illness, but studies of accidents in the general population are usually inadequate to The risk of losing consciousness while driving a motor vehi­ answer basic questions about the medically-impaired driver. cle and the need to drive a car in today's society are opposing They often evaluate the incidence of accidents in drivers with forces at play in determining the fitness and ability of people organic deficits or some reported chronic illness. Ideal epi­ with epilepsy to drive. We must remember that until some 20 demiologic studies of epilepsy and driving would have to be years ago, in Canada and in many other countries people with performed over large regions with uniform licensing laws. Such epilepsy were not allowed to drive. A movement by Canadian studies would require that the state of health of all applicants for neurologists to establish guidelines which would enable people driving permits be determined, and that medical evaluations be with controlled or remitted epilepsy to drive was headed by the performed on all accident victims, including autopsies in fatal late Dr. Francis McNaughton and by Dr. Guy Courtois. At cases. Their driving experience would also require evaluation.1 present, legislation allowing people with controlled epilepsy to 2 drive exists in every province or state of Canada and the United Raffle's study of London bus drivers meets all these criteria.
    [Show full text]